Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Longhorns Fall Apart in Second Half, Drop Third Straight Conference Game

Game Recap: The #17 Texas Longhorns (15-7, 4-4) are still bailing water. Rick Barnes’ club dropped their third straight game for the first time since the 2004-05 season which was disrupted by Lamarcus Aldridge’s injury and PJ Tucket’s ineligibility. This team has no such excuses. The parts are all there but they have yet to find any cohesion.

The 58-55 loss drops the Longhorns to just .500 in the conference a half game out of a tie for fourth place. ESPN Bracketologist Joe Lunardi can have us as a #7 seed in the NCAA tournament right now, but even he would admit that we are trending sharply away from the a berth in the Big Dance.

Earlier this week, PB proposed that Texas try to really be two different basketball teams based on whether or not Dexter Pittman was on the floor. We weren’t sure this was even possible and less sure this was possible to achieve this late in the season. Well, for the first twenty minutes in Lincoln, the ‘Horns did just that.

With Dexter on the floor, Texas sat in a 2-3 zone, to protect Pittman from foul trouble, on defense and pounded the ball inside on offense. Other than a couple of possessions where Nebraska picked apart our 2-3 with some crisp ball movement, the defensive strategy worked. On offense, the Longhorns were more than adequate as well. Damion James and Dexter Pittman owned the paint and the offensive glass against the smaller Husker defenders. Had Texas made a few more shots or turned the ball over less their seven point lead would have easily been double digits.

The beginning of the second half could not have been better. Texas scored the first five points and jumped quickly to a 34-22 lead, their biggest of the game. The Longhorns appeared to be in control: they were executing offensively and not settling for perimeter jumpers, they were protecting the basketball, and they were playing solid defense without fouling. All that changed over the last 17 minutes of the game, and it was fatal to the Longhorns.

In the next five minutes, Texas scored zero points and turned the ball over four times (Gary Johnson, Connor Atchley, Connor Atchley, and Justin Mason). The Longhorns barely took shots, as they couldn’t hold onto the ball long enough, and the 12 point lead was cut to just four. Game on.

The Longhorns extended the lead back to 10, at 42-32, after a James offensive rebound and one, a AJ Abrams three point jumper, and a couple of Johnson free throws. Again it was not to be. In the next five possessions, the Longhorns jacked four three-pointers and another perimeter jumper, making just one-of-five. The ten point lead was gone in a matter of minutes, and the Huskers sank a three of their own to lead, 46-45.

With Texas leading, 50-48, and just under three minutes left in the game, it was Nebraska that showed up and knocked down jumpers to win the game. The Huskers went three-of-three from the field, including two deep three-pointers, and made two-of-four free throws. The Longhorns did get a three-pointer from Abrams to cut the lead to 56-55 but never regained the lead as AJ dribbled mindlessly against three Nebraska defenders and then threw up an ugly, contested three-pointer.

 

Star-divide

The outcome was: Maddening. I don’t know what else to say. This Texas team, despite not having a true point guard, still has four veteran starters, a decent bench, and a seasoned head coach, yet we have now dropped three straight all to teams that the Longhorns should have defeated. After an elating win at Baylor just two weeks ago, expectations were raised and this team appeared to have turned a corner: Dogus Balbay was finding his rhythm, Abrams was playing within a team offensively, Pittman and Johnson were providing scoring punches in the paint, James was becoming less reliant on his jumper to score, and the defense was still consistent to excellent. After three straight losses, everyone seems to have taken a step or two backwards. Balbay isn’t executing what Rick wants, selfish AJ shows up at the most inopportune times, Pittman can’t stay out of foul trouble, Johnson forces the action too often, James plays like Ray Allen on the perimeter, and turnovers severely damper an already limited offensive attack.

Stats of the Game: Texas 16 turnovers. Rebounds 34-30 Texas. The turnovers were absolutely killer. As usual, Texas got off to a slow start. The Longhorns had five turnovers before the first television timeout, and it didn’t get much better from there. It is hard enough for this Texas team to score points without giving away possession with turnovers.

And rebounding. Nebraska doesn’t start a player taller than 6-5. Our freaking starting small forward is taller that. Sure, we did end up outrebounding Nebraska but the Huskers grabbed more rebounds in the second half. How is that possible? Rebounding is about size, strength, and position, but it is also about effort. That effort was lacking in Lincoln yesterday. Nebraska snagged 11 offensive rebounds, many of which came off long rebounds or 50/50 balls. Not to sound like a broken record, however, our offensive is so poor that limiting second looks and protecting the basketball are critical to the Longhorns’ success. On Saturday, Texas failed in both areas.

The Offensive MVP was: Not applicable. Please don’t say AJ Abrams with 16 points on 6-of-15 shooting (4-of-8 from three). His forced three-pointer in the next to last possession completely eliminates him from consideration.

Don’t say Damion James either. DaMo did have a double-double with 13 points and 12 boards. However, he was a pathetic 5-of-14 from the field and too often relied on perimeter jumps when he should have been attacking the paint as much as possible. In fact, Damion had two offensive rebounds which resulted in lay ups and a free throw. So, if you take away those two buckets in the paint, Damion has just 3-of-12 from the field. Better teams might be able to overcome their star player shooting 25% from the field but this Texas team cannot.

The Defensive MVP was: None. Our half court defense was not bad nor spectacular and no one player stood out to me on the defensive end.

Three Things: (1) The Pittman Dilemma. To me, this says it all, from the Austin American Statesman:

"There were times when we tried to build things through him, but he was getting in foul trouble and averaging just 12, 13, 14 minutes a game," Barnes said. "It's hard to build through a guy doing that. But if he could give us 24, 25 minutes a night, it changes a lot."
That was Rick Barnes before the Nebraska game. Let’s look at Pittman’s line: seven points (3-of-4), six rebounds, one turnover, and four fouls in 13 minutes. Unless Pittman is able to stay out of foul trouble, which seems unlikely anytime Texas plays man with him on the floor, then Texas must change their offensive philosophy. PB talked about this in the Texas Basketball report: our offensive is so inefficient in the half court that playing full court with five great athletes on the floor is probably our best bet for this season. We’ll see on Tuesday night if Rick is seeing things like we see them.

(2) Tuesday night is a MUST WIN. Texas now sits at just 4-4 in conference play at the halfway point. Even with our strong non-conference schedule, 7-9 in conference will not get Texas into the Dance. 8-8 may not get the ‘Horns in either. So, we set our sights on 9-7 in Big XII play. We need five wins in the next eight games, and here is how we get there. Must wins—Oklahoma State, at Colorado, Texas Tech, and Baylor; Toss Ups—Oklahoma, at Texas A&M. Not likely—at Oklahoma State and at Kansas. Do you see five wins in there? It’s possible…

Box Score

NEXT GAME: Home vs. Oklahoma State – Tuesday 2/10 7:00 p.m. Big 12 Network (formerly ESPN+)

0 recs  |  Comment 18 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I think Texas needs to push the ball.

We are so athletic, and our half-court offense is so bad. We need to get into transition and get some cheap buckets.

Blazz

by blazzinken on Feb 8, 2009 12:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Oklahoma at home is a toss up????

No way sir, we are gonna get smattered by at least 25… did anyone see Blake Griffins play last night? Dear God!

by greenspointexas on Feb 8, 2009 12:18 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

What's Next?

I’ll get to see this team in person for the first (and only) time this season next Saturday in Boulder. That was a definite win for the Horns as recently as two weeks ago. Now I’m actually worried that the wheels have come totally off. After this 3-game stretch I only see one definite win left on their schedule – Tech at home. Every single other game is a potential loss, each growing more and more likely the longer this losing streak continues.

I’ve declared before here, much to the chagrin of the diehards, that this season’s goals of a deep run in the NCAA’s are gone. Just a week ago I still thought they could squeak out a 1st round win before falling in the 2nd. Now, just making the tournament would seem to be the best it’s going to get for Texas.

With that in mind, the question becomes “what’s next”. If you’re Rick Barnes and you know, you absolutely know that this season you don’t have the pieces of the puzzle in place to make a tourney run but that you’ve got an incredible recruiting class coming in next season – what do you do? Do you focus on the short-term attainable goal of making the NCAA’s and keep the Longhorn streak of appearances alive? Doing this probably entails compromising on the goal of establishing more team discipline by benching guys who freelance. He could just let’em play and hope the talent alone pulls out enough wins to make the tournament.

Or do you focus on the long-term goal of making 2009-2010 the year to drive deep into the NCAA’s with a possible Final Four appearance? Doing this probably means keeping some of the best talent available this year on the bench to develop the guys who are returning and can be major contributors to next year’s success if they learn how to play team basketball. Keeping the best (but under-performing) talent on the bench means losing games they might otherwise not.

I’m for the long-term goal. This team is already losing games they ought not. I think Barnes has lost control of this team and is being way too concerned about the psyche of individual players. His public statements about trying to figure out what buttons to push to motivate a particular guy, being too hard on them some times, not hard enough at others tell me that he’s spending too much time getting caught in the weeds of being the official psychotherapist to a dozen kids, and not the coach of one team.

IMHO Coach Barnes needs to pull himself out of that kind of therapeutic minutia and stick his foot in the asses of the entire team. He needs to stick his foot in their collective asses and DEMAND they produce and listen to his coaching lessons (i.e., to Balbay: “Whatever you do, don’t dribble the ball up the sidelines because their defense is designed to trap you there. What? You just did it anyway because you thought you knew best? GTF off my floor and into my doghouse and don’t come out until you can follow simple instructions.”).

Anyhow, I’ll get to see them live and in person in six days. I just hope that after forty minutes of play I’m not walking out of the arena in my burnt-orange shirt and hat being taunted by Buff fans who are giddy over the best win they’ll have the entire season. They are exceedingly obnoxious that way.

by RMHorn on Feb 8, 2009 12:26 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Unclear

Not sure what you mean when you mention shooting for long term success and sacrificing this season.

First off, this season is not over, far from it. Texas should be in the NCAA tournament this season. It has been a horrific stretch, don’t get me wrong, but Rick and most Texas fans (including this one) are not ready to write off the season.

Even if we were, what does that mean? Sitting AJ and Connor? Starting Mason, Balbay, James, Johnson, and Chap/Hill/Dexter. Is that what your advocating? You don’t appear to be a fan of Balbay so maybe Ward in the starting lineup instead of Dogus. Is this what you are hoping for?

Please explain.

--AW--

by awiggo on Feb 8, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"should be"

That’s the operative in your post. This team SHOULD be in the NCAA tournament, but they’ve not played like an NCAA tournament team since conference play started. And if they play the next month like they’ve played the last two months they WON’T be in the NCAA tournament, even though they have more than enough talent and the early season record to be there. Therein lies the rub: an under-performing team, out of character for RB (at least as far as the regular season goes).

RB should:

- Sit Atchley instead of trying to being Counselor Troi to him. He won’t be back next year and he’s not contributing to this season, so let him ride the pine and let Chapman and Hill compete for the time. Give them both a set of criteria they’ll be evaluated on and whoever is better starts, the other plays off the bench.

- Dogus is in the Dog(ho)us(e). He’s young, he’s wholly unfamiliar with US-style hoops. He may have future potential, but until he decides to follow his coach’s instructions to the letter he rides the pine. He’s not good enough to freelance, especially when his teammates aren’t on the same page and he ends up turning the ball over recklessly, multiple times each and every game. He’s a fast dribbler and passes the bb around faster than most, but he’s inattentive and a horrible shooter. Since he’s young RB may be able to develop him into something better. But he’s earned nothing yet, certainly not a starter role, the other young guys should get as much, if not more time on the court to develop, learn and earn the roll.

- Abrams has the most combined talent and experience on the team this season. But for the team “shooter’ to have a 37% season average, 33% in conference is inexcusable. I know coaches always say you need to let shooters shoot through slumps. But when does a slump become a player’s season par? Whether or not teams are doubling him and in his face AJ has not been on the mark all season long, with few exceptions. Expectations of Conner were raised last year when he had a handful of breakout games; but nobody confused him for a shooter. AJ has had as many "breakout” games this season as Conner did last; but he’s still considered the shooter? AJ had NBA fantasies at the end of last year and broke up the team chemistry when he and his daddy wanted their egos stroked by prematurely testing the NBA. If he thinks defenses in the NBA will be easier to overcome than what he’s facing right now he really is delusional. NBA talent is able to fight through what the other guys throw at you. If I’m RB I tell AJ "look, it may seem like a raw deal that other teams are able to double you up and defend you almost to the exclusion of the rest of the team, but if you really want to play in the bigs you’ve got to elevate your game that much more – ‘cause in the NBA the other guys are all bigger than you, all just as fast, all of ’em know how to play defense better than anything you’re facing today. Your future is in your hands, either you find a way to get it done and prove to the scouts you’ve got it; or you go play in the European leagues; or you sell life insurance. In the meantime I don’t leave him in 40 minutes, Ward gets in for at least 7 minutes that AJ’s not.

- Dexter should play much more. And he should be allowed to foul out. If he gets into foul trouble early RB should leave him in. If he fouls out so be it. He needs to learn how to play without fouling so much, yet still be effective and not unnecessarily avoid contact. Let him get his 5th playing ball, not waste away on the bench with 4. He’s gotta learn and what better way than learning under the pressure of a real game with real foul out consequences. Pittman seems like a real good kid who wants to please his coach and teammates as much as he wants to feel good about his own effort. Let him fall off that bicycle and get some cuts and bruises. He’ll get the hang of it.

- Gary Johnson is an animal when he wants to be. I’ve watched him dominate the middle and his eyes glow red when he gets in a groove. If there’s a tonic RB can brew that brings out the Mr. Hyde in him for 25 minutes then he needs to be a’brewin. An angry Gary is a good Gary as far as I’ve seen. RB has to be Patches and Gary has to be Gordon (Dodgeball).

- Mason & James. Both these guys have regressed without a true team leader. In the absence of a leader on the floor RB has to fill that void with his own leadership. M&J have the talent to provide quality minutes in their respective rolls. But if RB has defined clearly what those rolls are it’s not obvious. RB needs to narrow down what he expects of them, but then expect they’ll perform those duties flawlessly. They’re trying to do too much, and not succeeding at doing anything well. They need focus and more definition.

- Ward has a ton of potential. The season is such that Texas can afford to develop him for next season now. The team is not going anywhere this year, and losing to OSU on Tuesday or CU on Saturday will send them to the NIT, regardless. It’s time to get Ward the playing time and experience he’ll need to be an impact player next year when the posse arrives. He can be a young leader to next year’s freshmen and transfer IF more is expected of him this year. Sure, he’ll make his share of mistakes, but as long as he is learning from them, and not making the same mistakes over and over (like Balbay continues to) he should get more and more playing time – even let him get a big taste of the conference tournament so he learns what stepping it up to the next level looks like.

- Chapman & Hill. Let ‘em compete for Conner’s minutes.

- Smith. Still a great unknown to me. Does he have anything? If not it must be nice to ride the bench and get four years of free school with no expectation of contributing anything in return. When UT was a weak program we had plenty of these guys littering the bench. As RB has succeeded he’s had fewer and fewer of these guys with splinters and bruises in their asses. If RB is asking himself what he’s paid for in reserving a spot for Smith he needs to find out. If he’s got game he needs to play like it when he’s in. If he approaches his minutes like they’re only junk minutes he’s filling then we’ll get more of the same. If he believes coach expects more maybe he’ll give more. RB should leave it crystal clear that he expects more. Otherwise, Harrison gets a four-year degree paid for just by being a junk minute cleanup guy. Every team has one like him, heck, that’s what we all thought Conner was until last season surprised us (but this season he’s back to form). Does Smith have a spurt in him to help?

by RMHorn on Feb 9, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Kicking ass

You want him to do what? Yell? Make threats? Punish them physically?

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Feb 8, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

2-3

This was the “trouble” scenario I outlined prior to the A&M game, though I argued we were more likely to go 5-0 than the worrisome 2-3. Fail.

I think you’re right: We need to get to 9-7 or else we’re needing to win two games in the Big 12 tourney to feel comfortable on Selection Sunday.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Feb 8, 2009 1:20 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I apologize about all of my irrational and incoherent comments yesterday, but

A big problem with this team is not necessarily the line-up, poor end of game management or coaching, but a lack of effort by the majority of the players. Yes, I do see that everyone puts in effort most games, but I do not see the players putting in the effort, all game-every game. Its almost like we play down to our level of competition and have little to no faith in ourselves. Thats my 2 cents.

by greenspointexas on Feb 8, 2009 1:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wrong again, Doc

Look, we’re all frustrated, but these easy diagnoses — “Bring in Smith!” “Try harder!” — just don’t get at the real problems. The team has many problems, but not playing Harrison Smith and not trying hard are not among them.

It’s fine to be frustrated and it’s fine to be critical. But think about what’s actually going on, what’s actually hurting the team, and what might be feasible in terms of fixing it.

That’s the challenge, and your guess may be as good as mine, so long as we’re not talking about obviously insufficient pleas for Harrison Smith or “extra effort.” That’s not it.

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Feb 8, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Im not saying that extra effort will fix this team, but it certainly would help stop the bleeding a little.

Very true PB, there are multiple problems with this team. This is maybe one of the most perplexing college b ball teams ive seen in a while. But while we cannot do things like insert Jai Lucas or get DJ back, or get Connor his shot back, I think we arent trying to win a times on the court and it is beginning to show. I just think that it is one of the easier problems this team has that can be worked on.

by greenspointexas on Feb 8, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Terrible Loss

I honestly have no idea how we could lose this game. NU was sooo small and we continued to settle for jump shots through the second half. Rick has to get these guys attacking the basket every. single. possesion.

Watching AJ jack up another terrible shot at the end of game was par for the course. You knew he was going to make a selfish decision there, but Barnes has to quit enabling that behavior. Two games in a row AJ has gotten the ball with under 30 seconds and fucked up. In both situations a two-point basket would have been sufficient. It just shows how this team settles for jumpers when they are so unnecessary.

GET TO THE BUCKET and we will start winning games.

Hook ’em!

by jimmer on Feb 8, 2009 4:41 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Big man moves

Apart from Dex, our guys don’t have the inside moves that most big men do. James and Johnson like to shoot mid range jumpers and back when Connor could shoot, he favored 3-pointers. (We have not seen his sweet little hook shot since what? November?) They get the vast majority of their inside points off of offensive boards and free throws. There is no point getting them the ball down low, because they don’t know what to do with it. For every basket, there’s a missed layup or a turnover. Does anyone remember Dexter Cambridge? His turnaround jumper was money in the bank. That’s what we are missing.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Feb 8, 2009 7:57 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm kinda surprised RMHorn is still allowed to post

after his comments in billyzane’s recap (which has disabled comments now)

by goingforthecorner on Feb 8, 2009 9:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I suppose you didn’t read the comments from jimmer that earned my reply?

by RMHorn on Feb 8, 2009 11:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Leave it be

Let’s all move on

--PB--

by Peter Bean on Feb 9, 2009 12:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs UC Irvine Gameflow (+/- stats included)
Horns_small
Thanks to our Men & Women in the Armed Forces
Small
The Aggies are doing just enough this year to give us a good upset.

Recent FanPosts

T1_1018_coltheisman_small
Texas vs Western Carolina Gameflow
Lemon_small
Pat Murphy resigns
Small
Orakpo says TCU can't hang
Clock_tower_small
The Weekly BON Hit Award Baylor
11-09_small
2009 Horns VS 2005 Horns....are we better? Equal? Worse?
Small
Vote for McCoy Saturday at Gate 25!
1994_brown_james_small
I am glad to say I've seen the greatest team of my lifetime...
Clock_tower_small
All I Want For Christmas
Horns_small
David Greene gets Colt McCoy just right
Brandedbevo1024x768_small
Article on Texas-Western Carolina Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Site Editors

Pb6_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Menbooger_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Jersey_front_small 54b

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Small whills

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Small TheElusiveShadow

Me_small burnt in ny

Official Partner of CBS Sports