Morning Coffee Asks Wood to Go to Work
Wood at work for the Horns. It doesn't take long for certain types of story lines with delicious appeal to spread. Remember a month ago? The '09 class just signed? No offers were out to anyone for 2010? One of the stories then was about the close-knit nature of the recruiting class, grown from Garrett Gilbert's early commitment that made him the leader -- an easy role to assume for a quarterback. As a corollary, the thinking went, Gilbert's early commitment made him the pied piper of the class, able to lure other players to Texas. Within several weeks of Gilbert's signing, the best quarterback in Texas in 2010 also made a decision to ply his services in Austin -- Connor Wood.
More than just the natural leadership inherent in the quarterback position, Wood has close personal connections to both wide receiver Trovon Reed and Reed's best friend, Lache Seastrunk. Perhaps even more important than keeping Wood away from the Sooners, the Houston Second Baptist quarterback now has 11 months to convince his friends to join him in Austin. Despite some reports that the conversations surrounding Reed's potential transfer to Houston to play with Wood were on hold, there is now word out that it may still be a possibility.
I wrote back in early February that I thought the Longhorns would be in good shape if they landed one of the three -- with Wood now in the fold, perhaps it's time to get a little bit greedy and hope that Wood's influence may make a difference in the eventual destination of the two other superstars.
The spring game as a recruiting tool. If DeMarco Cobbs makes it down to Austin, it will likely be to attend the spring game on April 5. It's not traditionally known as a big recruiting day, but the Longhorns coaches should use it as another unofficial Junior Day and an opportunity for the current class to bond and interact with the current players.
As a recruiting tool, get the current commits in and show the uncommitted players how much of a bond has developed already and for them to get a sense of who they could play with -- an advantage that no other school in the country possesses to the extent that Texas does. In addition to Connor Wood recruiting Seastrunk and Reed because they are his friends, get Wood and Garrett Gilbert in there to talk to DeMarco Cobbs about how they envision throwing to him. Darius White, as well, if he can make it down. The Longhorn coaches should try to get every non-committed player with an offer to the spring game.
As mentioned above, Garrett Gilbert's early commitment, as well as other early commitments, helped establish a bond between the 2009 recruits long before Signing Day or any of them stepped onto campus. Chemistry can certainly be overrated, but developing a rapport with your teammates can never start too early. Get as many of the current commitments onto campus for the spring game to let them spend more time with each and get used to the environment in which they will play in college.
Here's a hint Mack: you've got to score. In an attempt to understand the seemingly fickle computers that factor into the BCS, Mack Brown is trying to bring in some of the computer experts whose rankings are counted in the BCS. It's hard to criticize Brown for trying to understand the system better, but the problem is that he's got the whole thing by the tail right now. The computers weren't the problem last year -- the stupid human voters were. The human voters who couldn't remember what happened in October by the time December rolled around. The voters who got all starry-eyed when seeing the box scores of the Sooners scoring 60 points on everyone, but failing to understand that Bob Stoops was calling timeouts at the end of blowouts to score more points.
That's what you need to do, Mack. No more sportsmanship. No more putting in the back-ups early and then work hard to keep them from scoring. No, the offense needs to take on the same mentality that Muschamp instilled in the defense. Go hard for 60 minutes. I'm talking about 66-10 as the new 52-10.
Mack Brown should make it a goal of the team to break the Sooners' record for most consecutive games with 60 points or more at the start of the season and whenever else possible. Put up those gaudy scores so the fickle voters will know without any doubt when they see the box score that the Longhorns annihilated their opponent. Burn it into their soggy, muddled little minds.
Challenge Colt McCoy to give the offense the same killer instinct the defense possesses. He'll buy into it and help drive the first, second, and third teams.
Challenge Garrett Gilbert, who will likely be the second-string quarterback this season and needs to get quality playing time in 2009. When Gilbert goes into the game, the Longhorns should run their normal offense and keep trying to score points, particularly since he needs the experience to make the transition to starter less abrupt in 2010. He needs to learn to aggressively run the offense he will be running at Texas (yes, the actual plays) with some of the players he will be running it with. John Chiles' development at quarterback was significantly slowed by the team running a bullshit, time-killing version of the offense when he came into the game during 2008.
I've long been an advocate of sportsmanship and critical of Stoops, but if it becomes the difference between a chance at the national championship and an at-large bid, then sportsmanship has to go by the wayside.
Step on in, Major Applewhite. Greg Davis spends his games overlooking the field, as do many offensive coordinators -- they want to be the eye in the sky. That's where Major Applewhite comes in. Applewhite clearly spends his time on the sideline during games doing more than coaching the running backs -- he's the offensive coordinator on the sidelines, often talking with Colt McCoy about checking down to his backs and asking what the quarterback is seeing. With that established as his job during games in his first season back with the Longhorns, Applewhite must now become the cheerleader and chief provider of admonishment and correction on the sideline, demanding intensity from the offense in the same way Muschamp does for the defense.
First analysis of the elusive Ross Apo. As elusive and difficult to get on film as wide receiver John Harris has been, more recent commit Ross Apo is even more difficult to catch on some celluloid, as no film has yet surfaced on the Arlington Oakridge receiver. Presumably for that exact reason, Apo barely cracks the LSR 100 at 97, while Inside Texas has him much higher at 51, likely because they have seen some film that hasn't made it on the website yet.
Scipio Tex rightly questioned the strategy on the offensive side of the ball, particularly in taking receivers with redundant skill sets, as John Harris, Ross Apo, and Darius Terrell are all similar as big, not that fast, split-end types. While there isn't any one skill ($) that would make Apo a national prospect, he does a variety of things well. His size, at 6-3, is an advantage, aided by good hands and polished route-running ability, a skill that generally develops slowly with larger receivers, who generally have longer strides.
Perhaps the best indication for Apo is that he has excelled on the camp circuit, meaning he tests well in shorts one-on-one against other top prospects, drawing raves at the NIKE Camp ($) in Provo last summer as one of the top receivers at the event, narrowly missing wide receiver MVP honors. Barely days earlier, Apo was perhaps the best receiver ($) at the OU summer camp. Towards the end of the summer, Apo took home overall MVP honors ($) at the St. Louis National Underclassmen Combine, posting a 35.5-inch standing vertical and running a 4.32 shuttle.
Apo started out in high school at powerhouse Euless Trinity, but transferred because of the run-heavy nature of the offense. His current school, Arlington Oakridge, is a small private school that doesn't face stiff compettition -- in other words, the same concerns that surround running back commit Traylon Shead. The question, then, becomes one of transition -- can Apo learn the skills necessary to succeed in college that he hasn't had much of a chance to develop in high school?
Fortunately for Apo and Texas, the Longhorns won't ask him to contribute early, giving him as much time to develop as he will need. Expect Apo to shoot up the recruiting rankings when his film becomes available, as he has all the natural skills to impress observers -- exactly what he showed to Texas coaches, who aren't in the business of offering marginal players at this point.
82 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“if it becomes the difference between a chance at the national championship and an at-large bid, then sportsmanship has to go by the wayside.”
Could not disagree more. Sportsmanship is what makes Mack Mack and lack thereof makes Stoops Stoops.
by 40AS on Mar 10, 2009 6:32 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Mack doesn't have to run up the score
if Texas doesn’t lose a game. Texas will more than likely start the season #2 in the poll. If Texas remains undefeated, the team that has the best chance of breaking up a Texas-SEC title game match is USC, but their conference schedule is watered down and the computers may hold them back.
This is only true if Texas is the only undefeated team
There weren’t any undefeated BCS teams last year, and Texas got left out because of all this basketball score nonsense. Sure, if Texas had gone undefeated, they would have been in. But why is Texas the only team that has to go undefeated to play for the national title? Florida doesn’t have to because of Tebow, and Oklahoma doesn’t have to because they score 60 points per game.
And especially with the SOS being as pitiful as it will be in 2009, going undefeated is not enough. Mack has to leave no room at all for doubt.
Mack is definitely at a crossroads.
On one hand, being a jerk, a la Stoops, is not his style. On the other hand, he knows full well that scoring 60 five games in a row is why the Sooners played for the Big 12 title and the national title.
I think he’s probably hoping the voters come to understand how stupid they were being last year, rewarding Oklahoma for something completely bogus. But if Mack’s got a brain in his head, he should also realize that’s not going to happen. This is the new college football. Nobody cares if your defense is giving up 40 points a game. All the voters want to know is if your offense broke 60. For whatever reason, 52-10 is not as impressive as 63-35.
He knows being a nice guy can (and has) cost his players their shot at history. So the question is which is more important to him?
GG
If Mack let’s GG run the offense, I think 60 will be easy in most of the games on the schedule.
this is getting ridiculous
can we let the kid take a snap first before we anoint him as the second coming?
snaps
I think he took a few the past few years at Lake Travis. He did some pretty good things too. i know its High School, but he looks promising.
by Longhorns84 on Mar 10, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
2-3
I think the positions depend on whether or not Colt or GG win championships. GG could pass VY if he wins more than 1.
seriously?
We have a Heisman runner up returning for his senior year who shattered the season completion percentage record, lead the team within 8 seconds of a MNC with no running game and no tight end, and you want an unproven freshman to take over??
Reading comprehension any?
What are you commenters reading in this statement? I don’t see anything here that suggests GG is taking over for Colt. If you are a Sherrod Harris fan, then OK I can understand your outrage, but BSnyder really seems to think the original comment had anything to do with GG supplanting Colt as starter rather than just noting the backup QB needs to try and score points.
I think we can all agree that when the backup offense hits the field in a blowout we would rather they run the offense rather than just handing off to run out the clock. Not only would it help player development to have the backups and third stringers playing in real game conditions with real plays, but it could also help us score the extra beauty points needed to compete in the human polls. Plus it has the added benefit of not being quite as dickish as leaving in your starters and calling timeouts in the fourth quarter when you are up by 35.
WHAT?!
I’m talking about when GG comes in as Colt’s back-up! When Colt and the first team have a big lead.
by Longhorns84 on Mar 10, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
All appologies...
I completely agree with that explaination as you can see on my comment below
Harris
will be the back-up the first part of the year, but I think GG will eventually pass him as he gets more familiar with the plays.
Another disagreement about abandonment of sportsmanship
Something tells me that with the national attitude towards Texas (the state) and everything within it, even after a string of 60pt+ blowouts, the first time we have a challenging game and eke out another come-from-behind, the national media latches onto the story as “proof” that Texas is overrated and weaker than everyone thought.
I like when Mack gets pissed, but I like when he gets pissed but stays classy. Even if it buys him no amity with other coaches in the Big 12, I always admire someone who takes the high road more than someone who sells out for an opportunity.
I’m pretty sure there’s a quote about not sacrificing your morals just to get ahead of someone. I’m positive that Mack knows that quote by heart.
by TXinDC on Mar 10, 2009 8:19 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I have no problem
with Gilbert running the full offense in the 4th quarter with a substantial lead. I would have a problem with leaving Colt out there. I think a 40 point lead should be the threshold (give or take). We’ve got a TRUE freshman who’s probably going to start next year. We can’t have him just handing off to Hills and Newton when he gets a chance to see the field.
precident
I was thinking perhaps the best thing for the future would to have playing time run somewhat like Louisville did when Stefan Lefors (pretty sure that was his name) was a senior and Brohm came in as a freshman. Maybe a little bit less time given to Gilbert compared to what they did but it certainly was effective in helping Brohm’s development.
The problem is Texas can’t really do this because Colt is a Heisman candidate and stripping him of meaningful snaps isn’t really fair to him or the fanbase.
This is a great example.
I think you could give Gilbert meaningful snaps early in most games. With the exception of OU, Okie St, Tech, and A&M, I don’t see a reason not to. Every 4th possession or something like that would be great, particularly in the non-con schedule.
Colt’s Heisman chances won’t be affected by a few less snaps IF we go undefeated. Of course, if Florida is also undefeated, Colt’s not winning the Heisman anyway. Not if Gary Danielson has anything to say about it.
Apo
I haven’t read anything in particular about Apo taking a 2-year mission, other than discussions on this site indicating that he wants to do one. Because of that he’s not truly overlapping with “redundant” similar WRs. Plus there is potential upside to signing a guy who will start his eligibility at 20 as he will be even more physically and mentally developed (Quan started at 22). Apo is 6’3" 190 now, by 2012 the guy will be huge.
by the chairman211 on Mar 10, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions
Apo
I saw Apo play in person last year. I knew he was already on an ESPN 100 list for juniors so i followed him a bit. Not a whole lot to report on other than he looks real good in an uni. He’s def. 6-2/6-3 and fast, though its hard to tell how fast. His team has some pretty good athletes as far as that level of ball goes, and their coach does a terrible, terrible job given what they have, getting beat bad by a well coached team with considerably less talent. He’ll definitely have some work to do as far as learning the finer points of his position, and overall the game of football.
Do you remember who they were playing?
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Mar 10, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
They lost to All Saints with a legit top 100 prospect? Unreal
The kid is going to have an adjustment to the Big 12.
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Mar 10, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions
He is a receiver...
If your QB stinks you could be Jerry Rice and not make any plays and never win a ballgame. The odd thing is that if he is an A+ athlete then why isn’t he the QB? It seems like a lot of weaker teams will just give their best player the ball on every snap and hope he can do something positive rather than just running him out on pass patterns with no hope of the QB getting him the ball.
Yeah, those were my thoughts
I would think at that level the entire gameplan would revolve around getting the ball in Apo’s hands – be it on special teams, gadget plays or a position switch. The fact that hasn’t happened seems to say that either the coach is irredeemably adverse to winning or the small school politics has taken over.
Either way, he’s not going to be seeing any more mid 5.0’s defensive backs at the Big 12 level.
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Mar 11, 2009 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions
After thinking about it...
It is, of course, entirely unfair to judge him at this point. Could be he can’t throw the ball and he doesn’t have the frame to suggest he would savor being a running back. It could be he is ‘just’ a receiver and that is where he is best suited and wants to play.
I don’t think we recruited him because he is going to blow away guys with his speed. He is fast enough and big enough to get open in our offense and would at least be a mismatch against a S or LB.
A funny double-standard...
Just thought of this after reading this quote from 54b:
The Muschamp Difference
If I was talking to an outsider about UT football and wanted to sum up why Muschamp is so special, that clip from the Rice game would be a great example to reference…it’s hard to put into words that overall attitude of it doesn’t matter who we’re playing or what the score is, we’re going to fight balls to wall on every single play.
How funny is it that it’s seen as classless and unsportsmanlike for the OFFENSE of a high-octane team to be shooting for the end-zone til the last whistle, yet that same cut-throat attitude is lauded when we’re talking about the defense?
Don’t get me wrong – I don’t mind! I’m all for it. Just an observation.
But just as frustrating as it must be as a defense to get tossed around and scored on 5+ times, you can see how pissed QB Clement is in this video at being shut down AGAIN after 7+ chances: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbFyjYi7rj8
There's a difference though
In that instance, Texas was up 18 in the 2nd quarter, not up 40 in the 4th quarter. And it was a goal line stand, not a stop in Rice territory. You either stop them from scoring or let them pull within 11 with only a few minutes till halftime. No coach is magnanimous enough to just allow a team to walk into the endzone in the 2nd quarter.
My personal opinion is that every player on the field should be giving 100%, regardless of what the score is or the time left on the clock. I just don’t happen to believe that your starters should still be playing (on offense or defense) when you’re up 5 TDs in the 4th quarter. Put in your backups and give them a chance to run plays. I agree with ctex80 that it’s not fair to throw a backup in and essentially tell him not to do anything that might lead to the scoring of points. They work hard in practice just like the starters, and they deserve a chance to show what they can do.
the difference
A team can still play hard, but the 1st teamers shouldn’t be playing. The 2nd and 3rd teams should be playing the a$$’s off.
There were so many factors that went into the Sooners beating us out
Running up the score was not one of them. If you remember, we did beat the Sooners in the human vote. The blame lies, in order:
1 – Losing to Tech
2 – Tie Breaker Rules in the Big 12
3 – Games out of our control falling against us (NU/CU, MU/KU)
4 – Granularity of the computer polls
5 – Tech looking terrible in Norman due to Leach throwing the game away on aggressive (poor) calls
….
231970520 – Stoops running up the score
231970521 – Us not running up the score
Please let us keep our sportsmanship.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Mar 10, 2009 9:23 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
We beat the Sooners in the AP, but not the Coaches
And the argument is that we should have been more than a couple of votes ahead of OU since we beat them by 10 on a neutral field.
And the argument is that we should have been more than a couple of votes ahead of OU since we beat them by 10 on a neutral field.
Which is another way of saying you disagree with the tie breaker rules. Which I agree. Head to head should have made it a non-issue after Tech was eliminated from discussion (see my blame #2).
Or you can look at it that everyone had one loss, OU’s was to the #2/#3 team, and Texas’s was to the #7 team (see blame #1).
At the very least, you have to recognize, burnt orange glasses or not, that OU and Texas were extremely close resume wise.
If it was just the human voters, we won 0.91345 to 0.91275
The Sooners jumped due to their pasting of what was thought to be one of the best in the nation, Tech (#2 in the nation at the time), which was a monstrous beat down thanks to Leach as much as Stoops (see blame #5).
I don’t think point totals mattered as much as us barely losing to Tech, and then OU curb stomping them. But that’s all conjecture. As is the assertion that we don’t need to run up scores to improve our ranking. We lost the Big 12 by 0.0128 BCS points, the humans had us winning, and the computers put 0.04 points between us (see blame #4), some of which would have definitely been different had CU and MU not choked away extreeeeeemly winnable games (see blame #3).
The BCS isn’t meant to even rank teams before all games are played, and sooooo many other things went into it, that I cant believe that running up the score was the difference. We like to take pride in taking the high road, so why would we opt to see that go away?
by BoddickerIsClutch on Mar 10, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
ou and Texas
did have very close resumes, but you would think Texas would get the nod because they beat ou by 10 on a neutral field. i know the rules, but that doesn’t make it right.
by Longhorns84 on Mar 10, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions
BiC, if you're going to insist on bringing facts into this discussion
You’re going to frustrate a lot of people
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Mar 10, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
The one your are missing
which I think is the real #1 is OU’s OOC schedule included 2 teams that ranked fairly high at the end of the year – Cinci and TCU and ours included none. OU played 2 BCS teams OOC (I believe they had a 3rd scheduled that got canceled), plus one of the non-BCS teams that is almost always in the running for an at large BCS bid. We played one BCS team OOC.
There was alot of talk about that in the last 2 weeks before the Big 12 Champ. game and to me, that was what pushed them over us.
This is completely within both teams control but I’ll bet you it doesn’t change even after Mack gets his answers from the BCS gurus.
by Horncasting on Mar 10, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions
Blame Urban Meyer
If he hadn’t backed out of a game with Texas, our OOC also looks nice with a W over Utah…..but he’s a dbag and wimped out several years ago.
by SneezyBeltran on Mar 10, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions
#1 is us dropping a game. We had the opportunity to take care of business and did not, all excuses aside.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Mar 10, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I assumed you meanted OU beating us out in the 3-way tie
If so, then us losing the game to Tech was precedent to the argument. If not then the rest of your reasons are moot – we’d have been a clear #1 in the country.
another point worth noting...
I agree that beating Tech solves everything. Undefeated champions of BCS conferences, unless it’s 2004, get title game bids. Part of the perfect storm against 1-loss Texas last year was Oklahoma’s ability (good fortune) to climb in the polls, thanks to every other team’s losses, immediately following their loss to us. Going into the Tech game, OU had made up the ground between us and was immediately behind us in the polls. So, even though we had beaten them on a neutral site 3 weeks earlier, they had to be ranked ahead of us after we lost, if we were to drop at all. Remember, we only passed OU in the human polls prior to the Big 12 championship game after everybody was told the effect on the Big 12 that week’s poll would have. If the teams between us & Oklahoma hadn’t all lost prior to the Tech game, we could have been able to drop in the polls, yet remain ahead of Oklahoma for the rest of the year, and very well may have had a larger lead in the human polls that would have sent us to the Big 12 championship game, rather than have voters reverse their votes from earlier polls and end up with a virtual tie in the human polls.
Apples to apples
The problem here is that out of conference records are determining the conference champions. Blame the Big 12 for surrendering control of its tie breaker to ratings involving teams outside the conference.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I don't know...
- holds true in the end as #1. The voters will always hold the last team to lose as having the worst loss no matter the score or the circumstances.
I think the argument could be made however that the voters overrated OU based on their running up the score and us avoiding doing the same. If OU had gone into the 7th week of the BCS ranked 5th in the polls (as they were at the end of the season), then we would have been given the nod for the Big12 champ game even if we stayed 3rd in both polls. Their overrated Coaches poll position was a critical factor in our being left out in the cold.
To me, it isn’t too hard to see USC being ranked ahead of OU if you took away their ridiculous point padding.
That's It
Number 1 hurt the worst.
If you look at the loss at K-State when Colt injured his neck (we were victimized by trick plays – repeatedly), and the Tech game that season where we had the comeback, it’s clear we aren’t always prepared as we should be for a game. A few other examples exist but for brevity’s sake…
We have to show up every time giving our A-game from opening kick-off. Everybody brings their A-game to play Texas. Good preparation & execution for the Tech game last year & we’re not talking about sportsmanship.
by HalfmileHorn on Mar 10, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Good stuff, guys
Also dead stuff. Let’s move on.
BCS and tiebreakers and OU’s point-a-minute attack weren’t what caused last year’s frustration. It was 60 minutes in Lubbock (the first 30, actually) . . . USC at Oregon State . . . us at Tech . . . Penn State in Iowa City . . . Alabama’s fourth quarter vs. Florida . . . that’s what decided who played for the MNC. Not all that other garbage.
I Agree...
with what many others have said… colt and the starting Offense and D for that part don’t need to be in if we we are up by 40 throwing bombs for the end zone. However I would love to see Gilbert or whoever else is backing up in their driving the field and playing like our hopes for the MNC are on their shoulders (because they might be). There is nothing sweeter than watching our back ups dominate another teams starters. Let our second/third team run our offense and score 20 more! Its sad to see those guys who bust their but all season long in practice go in to run a draw series or a prevent D when they could have 15 minutes of meaningful plays in game time experience.
Three Points!
1) The Horns may run up the score if our second and third strings are overpowering a weaker opponent and they just can’t keep them out of the endzone, but Mack will NEVER, EVER smack around hapless opponents the way the BGB was perpetrating late in the season. Even when it was allegedly “all on the line” vs. Aggy, he still kept the game under control… And that was still the worst beating they’d taken from us in about 100 years.
2) On a very related note, we may “subtly” brutalize teams this year with aggressive defense. 52-0 is the new 52-10.
3) On the issue of when to play backups… Gilbert definitely needs to get quality reps, but this year is a numbers game with Colt and The Heisman. He needs 250+ yards and 3+ TDs. If he throws a pick then he needs 300+ and 4+. If Colt has already had a monster game midway through the third, then pull him out, otherwise he needs some extra padding. Media will give Tebow a “leadership credit” for 1000 yards passing, 500 running, and 10 TDs before the first kickoff.
Or maybe Colt needs to haul a camera crew to Peru with him
Or lose at home to an unranked team, grab a microphone, and act out a big drama about how hard he’s going to work the rest of the year. Tebow has set the golden standard for how kissing up to the media pays huge dividends.
*
It’s okay to beat the shit out of OU. Throw the deep ball, I care not.
Here Here!
Yes I would love to see us destroy OU by 40+ ….But if we take out all the aggression that has been built this year and shut them out and destroy them, the media will say we didn’t play anyone at all and the voters will penalize us! Well crap!
agreed with BiC
This is all rehashed, revisited crap we all had to deal with as the football season ended. Public enemy #1 was the Big 12 tiebreaker rules. If we had the rules everyone else seems to have, we play Mizzou again, not OU. Case closed.
Now, want to get bad at something else that cost us? Get mad at all of the teams on our schedule that choked away games. Teams like CU blowing the Nebraska game, Mizzou getting beat by KU, which hurt in some computer rankings, etc. End of the day, the computers hurt us, too, but if the tiebreaker rules match other conferences, we go to KC, not OU. If nothing else, this sets up the symmetry to 2004 → 2005.
I just read this on rivals
“Word is coaches on Oklahoma’s staff met with members of Rich Rodriguez’s Michigan staff recently to discuss offensive strategies.”
I read it again because it makes more sense for Michigan coaches to visit Oklahoma’s staff to discuss offense. I know RR runs an efficient option game with the right personnel, but I’m not sure what to make of this.
I am not happy about people wanting to run up the score. Screw the polls. We’re Texas and there is a right way to win and a wrong way to win.
I do like the idea of Connor putting the squeeze on his buds to join him at Texas.
The commits from Apo, Harris and Terrell are all first rate. Being an Asst. AD I get to join the local HS coaches in the film room. We get tape from all over the state and send out tape to other schools as well. Look for them redshirt as Fr. and be very solid contributors.
I meant to add: We were at the clinic over the weekend and a well know UT coach called Rivals a %^&$#@ joke.
Uh....given your position...
I need for you to provide input more often! Give up the goods! Us long distance fans need it bad!
Throw Ya Horns, Mayne
I think there are some concerns with Conor Woods...
How strong is his commitment?
I mean is he a longhorn all the way or might pull brantley or some other QB recruits who backed out in the past
I believe Woods is either a 4 star or possibly a 5 star recruit, and it is kinda hard to see him willing to sit behind GG for 2+ years, especially IF GG were to be the primary backup and does well. (Although, taking in consideration of how mack runs the program, I realistically think that Sherrod will be the primary backup and GG will get the mop up duties in blow out games)
Are we bound to see the second coming of McCoy vs. Sneed with these 2 QBs?
COACH BOOM BABY!!
No reason to think he will back out of his commitment
I think Brantley partly got cold feet because he realized how far from home is was going, as well as the quarterback situation. Wood repeatedly talks about not caring if there is competition; he wouldn’t have committed if he wasn’t willing to sit for a while.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Mar 10, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Something is intriguing about this kid
Wood repeatedly talks about not caring if there is competition
I love that. This is the kind of person you want to have the ball with two minutes left and down by 4 on the road.
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Mar 10, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Can we all get on board with the fact ...
that it’s Connor Wood … not Woods?
Let’s not be like A&M fans and misspell our player’s name for his entire career, e.g. Jorvorskie Lane.
C. Wood
I have concerns about Wood’s commitment also. It seems as is GG has to play as a true freshman to even make him coming to UT possible. If he is truly the big time four or maybe 5 star prospect, I find it very hard to belive he is willing to sit for three years when other major programs will be offering playing time right away
Gilbert is a rare breed
The kid made it clear from the get-go that he wanted to be a Longhorn. He never asked for concessions from the coaches. Whether or not he redshirts has not even been decided yet, so that has nothing to do with Connor Wood committing to Texas.
Are you sure about GG?
I thought GG made it clear he would only commit early if the coaches didn’t recruit another QB, which is part of the reason Shepard committed early to LSU.
USC does it....
so why can’t a program like Texas have multiple very talented QBs on the roster? I think Gilbert will push Wood to be even better. Matt Barkley went to USC even though Mustain and Corp are there. It
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
I don't think people are grasping the concept yet ...
that starting even one year for a program like Texas can cause your NFL draft position to skyrocket. And it’s probably because it’s been a long time since Texas had to play that game. We’re so accustomed to QBs who start for 3 or 4 years that we can’t wrap our minds around the fact that what Colt McCoy is doing (starting 4 years at an elite program) is a very, very rare thing. It’s not something that happens all the time, and these HS players, especially the types like Wood and Gilbert, don’t expect that anyway. They expect to compete, and they expect to be surrounded by the kind of players who can make one year at Texas worth more than 4 at most other schools.
Yeah we've never been much fo a QB school before...
but now…it seems like we are slowly developing some good QBs. Hopefully they’ll also start having some success in the NFL!
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Let's make a distinction here
Perriloser picked Texas long before the recruiting pressure ratcheted up. And he obviously had character issues, plus being in the backyard of the 2003 national champs . . . Brantley (more accurately, Brantley Sr.) used a commitment to Texas as a way to get the pretenders in the SEC and ACC off his son’s back. The kid was always going to be a Gator.
Wood is an in-stater who was a Texas lean before Gilbert signed. He weighed the issues and committed anyway.
so going back to roy's point
What would be Wood’s angle on getting other guys to play with him (seastrunk and reed)?
Hey, do you guys want to come to Texas and play for this GG guy while I sit behind him for awhile?
Iono it just seems like wood is in a weird position to be wooing other recruits….
COACH BOOM BABY!!
That's a good point
I think the angle is that they are already friends and at some point would have a chance to play together, but you are right, Wood certainly can’t guarantee that it would be soon. I think it would probably have more of an impact on Seastrunk, anyway, since the class is almost wrapped up at receiver.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Mar 10, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes, also an insurance policy against disaster.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Mar 10, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Why do you say that?
A few years ago when Colt was in high school, didn’t everyone predict he would be a 4 year starter, multiple record-holder and Heisman finalist? I certainly did. I just forgot to tell anyone.
by Longhorn in Canada on Mar 10, 2009 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions

by 






























