Bracket Breakdown: Midwest Regional
Our tour of the bracket continues with the Just Desserts Louisville's Reward Death regional in the Midwest. (Previously: East Regional)
When trying to explain why this bracket terrifies me so much, I think back to something Bob Knight said a few months ago with which I vigorously agreed: Come tourney time, what you really, really, really don't want to deal with is a team that's going to defend like hell for 40 minutes. Which means the only thing that could have made this regional slightly more scary would have been Memphis on the 2-line.
All data from Ken Pomeroy. Teams listed in order of best to worst within each category. Each team's national rank is listed in parentheses.
| Bracket Rank | Offensive Efficiency | Defensive Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arizona (7) |
Louisville (2) |
| 2 | West Virginia (15) |
Kansas (5) |
| 3 | Kansas (19) |
West Virginia (7) |
| 4 | Ohio State (26) | Michigan St (10) |
| 5 | Boston College (27) |
Wake Forest (14) |
| 6 | North Dakota St (32) |
USC (19) |
| 7 | Michigan St (33) |
Utah (21) |
| 8 | Wake Forest (40) | Cleveland St (29) |
| 9 | Louisville (42) | Dayton (41) |
| 10 | Siena (49) | Ohio St (72) |
| 11 | Utah (52) | Siena (90) |
| 12 | USC (62) | Robert Morris (91) |
| 13 | Cleveland St (121) | Boston College (131) |
| 14 | Dayton (144) | Arizona (132) |
| 15 | Robert Morris (170) | North Dakota St (139) |
| 16 | Morehead St (173) | Morehead St (171) |
MIDWEST REGIONAL BREAKDOWN
Top Conspiracy Candidate: This Regional Did the Selection Committee intend to place 4 of the top 10 defensive teams in one bracket? And 7 of the top 21? If so... does that explain why 11th-seeded Dayton (#44 in AdjDE) and 13th-seeded Cleveland State (#29) also got sent to the Midwest?? "But... but... what about Boston College and Arizona?" you ask of the two teams with opposite profiles (strong offense, no defense). And I answer you with another question: Is it mere coincidence that those are the two teams most widely regarded as over-seeded??!?

Billy Packer would have sniffed this out.
Best First Round Match Up: (4) Wake Forest vs (13) Cleveland St It's the young runners (Wake) versus the experienced plodders (CSU), in a battle for control of the tempo. When Wake succeeds in opening things up, they can play with and beat just about anybody. But their young squad struggles when the game slows to a pace that they don't want to play, and few teams play the slow-down game better than the senior-laden Vikings. This could be interesting.
Sexiest Cinderella Pick: (14) North Dakota State Kansas' "protected" seed draws them a date in Minneapolis with a pesky mid-major from Fargo, North Dakota? Not only is the crowd going to be going berserk for the Bison, but -- more conspiracy! -- the last time KU drew an opening round game against a team with the Bison as a mascot.... they lost to Bucknell.
Best "Shoulder Chip" Game: (5) Utah vs (12) Arizona The 'Cats have spent this entire week hearing about how they were the Selection Committee's lone mistake. And Utah has spent the week listening to everyone remind them that Vegas has pinned them as underdogs to... the team so many don't think should be in the tourney at all.
Stone Cold Lock: (2) Michigan State -17 over Robert Morris The Spartans are a sleeping giant and -- when they're focused defensively -- primed to blow out weak offensive clubs. Robert Morris most definitely qualifies. I'm expecting a big, big win.
The Game College Hoops Fans Should Hope Happens: (1) Louisville vs (4) Wake Forest You can count on two fingers the teams which can match Lousiville's outrageous athleticism -- Memphis and Wake Forest. The Deacs are young, but to watch their supremely talented offense try to run on Louisville's masterful and athletic defense would be oh so fun to see. Let's hope for it.
How did we get this far without mentioning: (6) West Virginia, (9) Siena, (10) USC West Virginia is comically underseeded, Siena is deep, experienced, and dangerous, and USC is a team I wouldn't want within 200 miles of my own favorite basketball team. Congratulations, Louisville: this is your reward for being the bracket's overall #1-seed.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good breakdown.
Let’s just say I’m not exactly looking forward to this region.
Particularly this entire NDSU nonsense. I’m almost convinced we lose in Round One.
Ugh.
I was so hoping...
…for KU to be matched up with the Binghampton Bearcats. I guess I’ll just have to settle for one B.
We'll carry the banner high!
Bring On The Cats
Good stuff, PB
Since the moment the pairings were out, I’ve been harping that this is the toughest regional and this certainly gives me some more ammunition for my argument. Another thing I found interesting was that the top three seeds all won a BCS conference outright. And the fourth seed tied for second in a good ACC.
That’s tough to match.
Akron vs Gonzaga
Zips vs Zags. Can’t miss that.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Look out for Utah
they have a 7’2" center that will probably be hard to stop. I think they will beat Arizona handily. Their defense is absolutely awful, and Zona has played poorly in the last 5 games.
But could Utah upset Louisville? I think it’s possible. No true C on Louisville, and their options to guard him are some 6’9" guys. Just like Pittman will determine our fate, Utah’s center will determine their fate.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 17, 2009 4:17 PM CDT reply actions
lol
no freakin way man. Ive seen utah in person this year. Slow as Christmas. Louisville will run them ragged. 15+ point win easily.
by Michael Bean on Mar 17, 2009 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm not sure about a blowout
Utah shoots the ball better than Louisville from the field, from three, and from the line. And again, who’s going to stop Luke Nevill?
by goingforthecorner on Mar 17, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions

by 





























