2008-2009 Longhorns Good But Never Great
The Texas Longhorns are done for the season. But why? My first reaction at the end of last night’s game was the same as many of yours—blame the refs. We got robbed! Duke got all the calls, all the bounces, all the breaks, etc. Upon further reflection, whistles were not the reason that we lost in the second round to Duke. In fact, I thought the Duke loss was a near perfect manifestation of the entire season.
The same questions we had about this team before the season were never answered. The same warts that we saw in conference play appeared again in Greensboro. And the same players basically played the same way in the NCAA tournament that they had all season.
I don’t want this to be an overly negative post and I promise another post with all the positive things this team did over the course of the season. But I think it is important to single out the reasons why this Texas team was good but never great.
No Reliable Point Guard
Sure, Dogus Balbay came on late in the season and showed on many occasions that he could lead the team. But in pressure situations, the lack of true point guard who could pressure a defense with passing and scoring hurt the ‘Horns. How many times this year did you write in the comment section that you missed DJ Augustin? How many times did you and your fellow basketball lovers curiously question where this team would be had Augustin elected to stay another year? I know that I did plenty of times just as I did after TJ Ford left after his sophomore year.
Rick Barnes started the year with AJ Abrams at the point but that experiment was over before the team returned from Maui. Abrams could not create off the dribble for others and is much better in catch-and-shoot situations than firing off the dribble. Then, we put the ball in Justin Mason’s hands. This worked fine, for the most part, and Mason even filled up the stat sheet with five, six, and seven assist games against just a turnover or two for the better part of the middle of the season. But Mason’s defense began to slip and opponents began to figure out that Justin couldn’t hit the backboard, let alone sink a jumper, from more than 15 feet. So, the Mason era ended and Dogus Balbay took over.
Again, Texas fans were struck with instant positive results. Dogus is incredibly quick off the dribble, a remarkable athlete, and a more than capable passer with either hand. Unfortunately, Dogus was not a pass first-shoot second leader like he had been billed since his arrival in Austin. Balbay is a past-first, drive-second, pass-third, shoot-never point guard. As opponents figured out that Balbay had never seen one of his jumpers fall through the hoop, a one man zone became the defense of choice for Big XII opponents down the stretch. Never was this more apparent than at Oklahoma State when Terrel Harris began to double team Dexter Pittman in the post even when his man, Balbay, had the ball at the top of the key.
Our point guard by committee, like our team, was serviceable but never great. It could be argued that a fourth part of this committee was forced to emerge last night as Varez Ward more than earned his playing time with a gutty, attack the basket 16 point performance over and around the slower Duke defenders. I would remiss unless I pointed out that the need for Ward to assume the ball handling duties full-time would not have been needed if it wasn’t for the below average performance by Balbay. Take a look at his line last night: 32 minutes, 2 points, 3 rebounds, 0 assists and 4 turnovers. It is hard to be a dynamic offensive team when your point guard plays nearly the entire game and fails to record a single assist.
No Perimeter Shooting
Other than AJ, this team can’t shoot from outside the lane. Please don’t point out Damion James’ occasional three-pointer or Gary Johnson’s 16 foot jumper. Fool’s gold, both of them. Last night, Texas shot 3-of-12 from behind the arc. On the season, Texas shot 32.8% from three, good for 234th best in the country (Ken Pomeroy). Of 344 Division I teams, shot ranked 321st in the country in percentage of points scored from behind the arc. Texas got just 19% of all points from deep.
I am not advocating that Texas needed to be a three point shooting team. They did not. Before the season, the strength of this team appeared to be Dexter Pittman, Gary Johnson, Alexis Wangmene, and Damion James scoring in the paint. Texas did, however, need to present at least the threat of an outside shot so that those players wouldn’t be defended with two players before they got the ball and three players after.
Texas has never been a great team at feeding the post. To me, this is a weakness that has been present throughout the Rick Barnes era. This year, though, the problem wasn’t the skill of actually feeding the post as much as it was that there was little to no room to do so. If defenders aren’t worried about getting torched by perimeter jumpers, they naturally sag off the offensive player to both encourage long jump shots and to more easily eliminate driving angles. That is exactly what happened this season as defenses would have paid every Texas perimeter player, except AJ Abrams, to shoot jumps shots.
Shaky Free Throw Shooting
Texas shot 16-of-25 (64%) from the free throw stripe against Duke. Duke shot 21-of-27 (78%) from the free throw stripe against Texas. Also, the Longhorns were just 8-of-14 (57%) in the second half. Imagine how different this game would have been had Texas sank a few more free throws. Imagine how many close games would have gone differently had Texas not shot just 66.8% from the line as a team. Would we have won another conference game, finished alone in fourth in the Big XII, and maybe earned a better seed in the NCAAs? Maybe. We probably would have defeated Duke in their own backyard and been preparing for a rematch with Villanova as I write this. Regardless of how the calls went down the stretch, the team that took advantage of their trips to the line is still in the tournament while the team that left points at the stripe has been eliminated.
No Go-to Scorer
At one point early in the season, I wrote that we didn’t have a go-to scorer like Augustin, Durant, Tucker, or Ford. I questioned where Barnes would go in a final possession with the game on the line—AJ on the baseline or James in the high post or Dexter on the low block or our point guard of the evening off the dribble. I didn’t know then, and I still don’t know now.
Down two last night to Duke, Damion James called for, received, and shot a baseline three pointer that would have given Texas a one point lead with less than a minute to go. It was a good shot, but was it the best shot? Was a James jump shot our go-to-play? Abrams is certainly our most consistent and best shooter but he has been blanketed all of 2009 and cannot create his own shot. Dexter is an offensive force but can’t score unless he is somehow fed the ball. Balbay or Ward off the dribble are options as well. The point is that, unlike in previous seasons with a future NBA lottery pick in burnt orange, Texas lacked a go to player all season long.
Disappearance of Connor Atchley and Justin Mason
Did DJ Augustin really make that big a difference in the games of these two upperclassmen? Last night, Connor played six minutes, failed to score a single point in his final game as a Longhorn, and grabbed just one rebound. Justin Mason wasn’t much better (22 minutes, three points, one rebound, two assists, and two turnovers), and Barnes had so little confidence in him that he chose to leave Balbay in the game after moving Ward to the point, even though Dogus was not a threat to score at all.
Connor was in Austin for five years and has a remarkable junior season, but his regression this season was a big reason for the offensive stagnation, as were Mason’s struggles on both ends of the court.
All in all, this was a good but never great basketball team. The loss of Alexis Wangmene hurt on both ends, the inability to sink perimeter jump shots killed our offensive spacing, and the need to go small with three guards gave back some of our ability to rebound and defend at an elite level. As I wrote last night, I am proud of this team. They were certainly flawed in many areas but fought hard all season long and came within a bounce or two of the Sweet 16.
Future posts will look at the positives from the 2008-09 campaign, Damion James’ NBA decision, and in addition to the incoming freshman and Jai Lucas, what our existing players need to improve on to take this team back to the Final Four.
32 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent review of our flaws
And yet despite all the alarming weaknesses, we almost took Duke to the brink of defeat. Amazing when you think about it.
What’s great is how most of the flaws (if not all) will be fixed with our recruits and Lucas (maybe Brown?) coming in mid-season.
As disappointing as Balbay was yesterday, Ward was equally impressive. Even Ward was a few inches away from hitting a three near the end of the game. It is absolutely imperative that Balbay gets to work on his jumpshot.
They did not. Before the season, the strength of this team appeared to be Dexter Pittman, Gary Johnson, Alexis Wangmene, and Damion James scoring in the paint.
Wangmene was out and Pittman indeed became a beast in the paint. But what in the world happened to James’ and Johnson’s inside game? Both players were far too often receiving the ball in midrange and the 3 point line with James. Johnson basically became a jumpshooter from 15 feet. What happened to his post game, with his hook shots? The PJ Tucker comparisons have pretty much been thrown out the window. You could say the same with Connor with the hooks. As for James, it was fitting his final shot was a three and it rimmed out. He could’ve killed other teams with his inside game but instead he too often sulked around the perimeter. The question is how much responsibility does Barnes deserve for this. If we were grooming him to be a 3 for the NBA, then we really screwed up there. If he comes back, he has to play the 4 for the sake of the team. Barking Carnival brought up that he had the same number of turnovers as a field goals made (6). That is awful.
As for the disappearance of Connor and Mason, did anyone ever figure out the supposed off-the-court issues Atchley was having? Who knows if that had any affect on his game. As for Mason, I think the extra responsibilities took a toll on him. At his best, he’s playing with no fear and no pressure like what we saw with Ward. I want him to become more of a glue player like we saw his freshman year. I think he’s the kind of guy that will benefit the most with the additional talent next year, along with Johnson.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions
Connor, Johnson, James inside disappearance
I think was more a by-product of our guards inability to score from the outside. Constant double teams makes any inside game disappear if you can’t make the defense pay for the double. An offense with more motion may have allowed for a better inside game, as defenders have to continue follow their man or risk giving up layups on back cuts. Motion offense is not Barnes’ style, he prefers to exploit one on one match ups through isolation or pick plays.
I am not as down on Barnes’ offense as some. I think it can allow him to focus the offense on the star players (Durant, DJ, and even Pittman this year). It also expends less energy on the offensive end, good for teams with limited depth that play a lot of high pressure man to man on the defensive end. The issue is you have to make double teams pay by hitting jumpers to be able to isolate. It does not have to be with the three, if mason or Balby could even had hit 15 foot jumpers it would have made a huge difference.
Not entirely
You also have to look at what these guys did when they did get the ball down low. None of them was able to finish strong. Instead, if there’s no dunk, they flip up prayer shots. Too often they threw the ball away. Our real inside game (other than Pittman) has mainly been follow shots and tip ins.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
#8 Oklahoma St. tied with #1 Pitt 74-74!
that would kind of sting to see OSU pull off an upset (against a team probably better than Duke) while we weren’t able to.
I’m also jealous of Arizona, and it shows how much luck plays a part in the tournament. Arizona advanced to the Sweet 16 without playing a BCS school. They’ve played Utah and Cleveland St. so far.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 3:53 PM CDT reply actions
Durant obviously pissed off about last night's game
and is taking it out on the T-Wolves. He has 21 pts, 6 rebs, 5 assists, and is an astonishing +33 in the game.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions
This is the first year for ESPN
but they did it last year (and maybe further back) on Yahoo! box scores.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Only one thing this team needed to win games we lost this season....
TALENT
Abrams was our only decent shooter, cant blame him for taking 25 – 30 shots a game. Was actually happy when he shot from deep, rather than James or Atchley.
James was spotty at best, I cringed most of the time when Johnson shot a jumper, and turned the channel when Mason tried to head fake defenders.
Dex will be a force next year, providing that he loses a little more wieght and becomes quicker
I was wrong about Ward, unless the game last night was a fluke, which it might have been
There is no way James leaves us this year…. but if he happens to, I dont see him going higher than the 3rd round. Sure he has a good build and can dunk, but good god he cant dribble at allllll, and his defense is rather suspect as the season went on.
I look forward to seeing Mason on the pine next year next to Balbay, bring on the OFFENSE! Watching defenders play 10 feet off of both of them was embarrassing for our team and program.
Hopefully Lucas, Hamilton, Bradley, Williams, and Brown will come to wreck next year. Itll prolly be us vs. Kansas again for the Big 12 title.
by greenspointexas on Mar 22, 2009 4:51 PM CDT reply actions
Greenspointexas encapsulated in 1 sentence:
There is no way James leaves us this year…. but if he happens to, I dont see him going higher than the 3rd round.
Complete lapse in logical continuity (represented quite conveniently by an ellipse) combined with a shocking lack of knowledge about basketball, topped off with an absolute certainty that what he is saying is both correct and profound. You said it better than I ever could.
by billyzane on Mar 22, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
wow guys, obviously u didnt catch my sarcasm
im not even sure he’d get drafted at this point
by greenspointexas on Mar 22, 2009 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I kind of wonder
About the things you might have said during our 2007 football season. Even the more rational fans were reluctantly questioning Colt McCoy’s abilities and were pretty angry at Akina and co.
Perhaps you should try to post with less highly charged emotions. This squad didn’t have the most talent but it definitely had talent; it just never was able to mesh with the absence of a point guard like Augustin. This is virtually the same team that went to the Elite Eight and was a legit Final Four contender with DJ. Saying vaguely that if we just had more talent doesn’t address any of the problems this team had. Sure, if we still had Durant and Augustin on this team, it’d be much better. That’s not exactly very enlightening.
I hope you stick around for this upcoming football season (I was more active in the fall; haven’t been posting much this spring), but if you do, try to, uh, listen to your fellow posters here a little more.
by TheElusiveShadow on Mar 22, 2009 7:27 PM CDT up reply actions
If this is a bad year, that says a lot about what Barnes has created in Austin
Next year should be great!!!!
If James comes back will we be over scholarships?
Currently 12; less
2 seniors; plus
3 freshman; plus
1 transfer; =
14?
If James comes back
Smith has got to go, no? Or maybe Hill.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Not Harrison
Smith will be a senior next year. It makes no sense for him to transfer now.
I have no inside information. I repeat: I have no inside information. But if someone transfers, I think it has to be Matt Hill.
He will be buried next season on the depth chart behind Dexter, Gary, Chap, and Wangmene.
--AW--
Disappointments
Though for sure there were many positives, I will mainly think of this season as one that could have ended much better. So let me give you my list of ten greatest disappointments.
#-10 AJ fails to rise to the next level. I think he was correct in thinking his NBA prospects had to be a point guard, and it’s a shame he was not able to do the things he needed to.
#-9 Rumors about Matt Hill prove to be unfounded. A zero. (Score Smith as a 1)
#-8 Clint Chapman gets totally rattled, shooting an embarrassing 20% from the line.
#-7 See #10, but this time for James.
#-6 Balbay and Mason can’t hit the freaking side of a barn. And everyone knows it.
#-5 Tragedy and injury cost Wangmene the season.
#-4 Gary Johnson turns out not to be the star we expected. Good, solid player, though.
#-3 Bad Connor dominates. Remember when he was projected as a lottery pick?
#-2 Barnes doesn’t pull the rabbit out of the hat this time. He never found an offense and the defense was not dominating enough to drive one.
#-1 I missed three or four games because they weren’t on TV and there’s some deal that keeps them off the radio.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I'll get back to you on that next fall -Thx
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
#4
You really have a problem with Gary Johnson’s development? It has to be taken into consideration the amount of time he sat out last year which making this his first full year of collegiate basketball. The kid averaged 10 pts and 5 rebs this year.
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Mar 22, 2009 11:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah he was basically a freshman for most of the year
He’s much more of a finisher than a creator, so next year with the guys around him will hopefully allow him to flourish. Hopefully no more injury distractions.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 22, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions
Gary
Don’t get me wrong. I think he’s a solid player, but expectations were running pretty high even in his freshman year. This year he got lots of playing time and often as not his contributions were unimpressive. Maybe I should be more patient. After what the kid has been though, you’ve got to pull for him.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I have a problem with his shot selection and his development
True, this is his full season, but he had all summer to work on his game.
What I saw from Gary was 2 moves: either shoot a 15 footer (he doesnt even have a good shooting form, his release point is too high) or dribble on the right hand side (later in the season the opponents figured out that he could only go right and anticipated for charges)
COACH BOOM BABY!!
I'm kind of suprised at your opinion
Of course he has a high release point, AJ has a high release point. What would you suggest a guy 6’6’’ do against the people that guard him, usually 6’8’’ and above? Gary shot 45% from the field, I would think if he could kick it into the basic at 45% that should make us happy. Sure I’d like to see him pass a little more and play within the offense better. I think the charges are a result of putting his head down when he dribbles and not clearly seeing the defenders get to their positions. Overall, I think he is headed in the right direction. No pun intended.
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Mar 23, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
*basket, not basic
I need my oatmeal
-rBr-
by run Bevo run on Mar 23, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Time
I think most Longhorns should take some time off. The team did well considering the lack of threat at point guard. The writing was on the wall last year when DJ had to play 38 minutes a game. We had no back up. Barnes did well developing what he had with the time he had. Damion James switch to 3 was out of necessity for Texas to stretch the court. Yes, I know it didn’t work, but really what choice did Barnes have? With Pittman at the 5, we needed some space for him to work. No way does a motion offense work this year. Pittman doesn’t move well, but give him time. Everyone knows his story and how far he’s had to come. He’s just learning the position. I hope Damion James stays, but I don’t know where the scholarship comes from if someone doesn’t transfer or if he doesn’t just stay without the free ride. Mason…didn’t do well with the pressure last year either until he learned that he wasn’t the primary, secondary, or tertiary threat. He doesn’t do well with the offensive pressure…he is what he is which is a defensive specialist. Ideally, guys like him come off the bench as the situation arises. Last season he protected DJ so that he wouldn’t have to expend lots of energy on man defense or we switched to zone. Asking him to play the starting point is asking way too much to expect to get deep into the tournament. Gary Johnson I like a lot with another year of development. He started last year late because of the NCAA and his heart problems and never caught up by the time the team was more than halfway through the season. If Damion James leaves, I see him filling his role at the 4 as a fierce drive to the basket or midrange jumper. Conner…I pretty much agree with most people’s assessment. Balbay and Ward…I’m really looking forward to the mix with Lucas. We’ll finally have some depth at the point. Incredible talent next year and the following with good depth thanks to the ground work laid by TJ, DJ, and KD. Hopefully we can keep this team for 3 years at least, then Barnes will really get to show how good he is. Give it time. I’ll be happy if we get past the first week Tournament. This season’s team has been very schizophrenic with people playing out of position or beyond their roles, but I stand by this team and any Longhorn team that stands and fights to the end even in a losing cause.
The pride and winning tradition of The University of Texas will not be entrusted to the weak or the timid.
Hook'em
I am really interested to see how this team will turn out next year
I think there is a slim chance Dex will leave. We all know that.
Damion might leave because NBA scouts will probably like his athleticism and his potential. I think this year’s draft is pretty thin since there aren’t major talent like it has been for past couple of years. Plus, to me, it doesn’t make sense for him to come back and fight for his minutes against some of our talented freshmens (Hamilton and Williams)
He will probably go late first round (if he gets lucky) or somewhere in 2nd round
I agree with your assessment on Balbay. He showed some potential and great athleticism as a point guard. It makes me wonder tho….what if he didn’t injure his knee last year…he might have developed a decent jump shot…learned something from DJ…etc…sigh
Okay, due to late emergence of Ward and Pittman, what will our line up look like?
I believe some of our incoming class have enough talent to be one-and-doner’s
1st team: Dex, Lucas, Hamilton, Ward, Williams
2nd team, Balbay, Chapman, Mason, Wangmene, Smith
COACH BOOM BABY!!

by 

























