Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin Sets Assist High In Easy Win Over Sacramento

Morning Coffee Talks Jake Matthews

Horns_bullet_mediumAggies and Horns still on top for Matthews. Since the last update, not much has changed on the list of Fort Bend Elkins offensive lineman Jake Matthews, who possesses one of the few outstanding offers from the Longhorns. Texas A&M and Texas remain at the top ($), with the USC Trojans still a possibility, though they remain a somewhat distant third.

Again seeming tired by the process, Matthews acknowledged again that he doesn't have the same comfort level with the Texas coaches as he does with the Aggie coaching staff, mostly a result of his older brother playing on the A&M line. Since Jake's father Bruce owns a house in College Station that the elder Matthews brother lives in, all signs point to the Aggies being in the rare lead for a prospect coveted by both in-state rivals. Staying close to his Houston-area home is another priority for Matthews and another advantage for Mike Sherman and the Aggies.

In addition, Matthews like the pro-style offense Sherman runs, feeling it would prepare him better for the NFL and raising further questions about whether or not the zone-blocking scheme employed by the Longhorns might dissuade the technically-sound prospect from ending up in Austin.

For Texas to make up ground with Matthews, the coaching staff needs to get him to Austin for another visit before spring turns into summer, as Matthews would like to make his decision as soon as possible, part of the reason he doesn't have set plans to visit Los Angeles to see USC. Mack Brown rarely fails to make a strong impression on recruits, but unless Brown can create a greater feeling of comfort with Matthews, a process that would depend on a visit to Austin, the young man and his Hall-of-Fame pedigree may end up creating holes for the Aggies for years to come. Time is running out to make an impression.

Star-divide

Horns_bullet_mediumOlder brother connection may not be enough. After declining to take a true tight end in the 2010 class, finding a player at the position will be a priority for the 2011 class. One of the top prospects in that class has a last name that should be familiar -- Barnett. The younger brother of Eryon, a 2009 commit at defensive back, Chris Barnett is a coach's son ($) and possesses ideal size for the tight end position -- 6-5, 260 pounds. As a sophomore.

Tight end isn't the only position that Barnett could end up at, as he registered 71 tackles, seven tackles for loss, and two sacks from the defensive end position. With quick feet, good hands, and remarkable agility for a player his size, Barnett could end up being a college star at tight end or defensive end.

There's a problem, though. The younger Barnett is intent on making his own way and has Miami at the top of his list as a lifelong Hurricanes fan. Such allegiances don't always stand the test of playing time and distance, but Barnett hasn't even visited the Austin yet, instead choosing to take in the campuses at Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Baylor. In fact, Barnett doesn't even have any plans to visit this summer.

Sounds like the Longhorns might have to keep looking in their search for a tight end in 2011 and there aren't currently any other players on the radar at the position right now. It could be a year that Texas needs to look out of state.

Horns_bullet_mediumBible still a rising prospect. Perusing the latest Rivals100, it's surprising to continue seeing Greenwood, South Carolina defensive tackle Kelcy Quarles as the top-ranked defensive tackle, despite weighing only 240 pounds. Moving well down the list, it isn't until 41 spots later that one finds Taylor Bible's name.

Surprising because the Denton Guyer product possesses a degree of explosiveness and strength rarely found at a position that usually puts a premium on mass and leverage.

Guyer coach John Walsh provides perspective ($) on what makes Bible so special and why Texas fans can expect him to shoot up recruiting lists during his senior season.

I knew I had a good one from the beginning. The neat thing about Taylor is when he was in the eighth grade, just three and a half years ago, he was in our city track meet and he got third place in the 100. And there's a lot of speed in Denton.

If that doesn't raise expectations, consider this -- Bible is just recently learning how to put his talent to consistent use on the football field, still learning the extent to which he can dominate a game.

We knew he was going to grow and be a special, explosive player. The exact moment I knew he was University of Texas special was week nine of his junior season. He'd been good all year long, but after that point he was extremely dominant. 

Initially, Bible seemed to project as a three technique at defensive tackle, a position at which he would seem able to use his speed better and not have to face as many double teams. However, Will Muschamp told Bible that he will start out at nose tackle, but will get a look at as a three technique and perhaps even play some five technique, most likely against power running teams. Bible has experience playing different places on the line, having spent time at defensive end, as well as dropping back into coverage on zone blitzes, which his speed allows.

If Bible continues to work hard in the off-season and plays as a senior with the intensity and skill he displayed towards the end of his junior season, it would be an absolute shock for Bible not to earn a fifth star by the time he officially signs with Texas and end up at the best defensive tackle in the country.

Horns_bullet_mediumJai Lucas set to contribute. For a point guard, the nebulous term of "Basketball IQ" is often bandied about, but rarely quantified, rarely even qualified. A passage from the recent piece on Lucas illustrates perfectly what that term means:

During a team practice session, Texas was working on a play designed to feed the ball into the post, where center Dexter Pittman had re-emerged as a late-season force.

When redshirt Jai Lucas, taking his turn at the point, did not immediately acknowledge the upwardly thrust hand of the 6-foot-10 center, assistant Russell Springmann called a halt to the action.

"Did you not see him?" Springmann asked, wondering how the guard could have missed a target that without Cooley Pavilion walls could have been seen from nearby I-35.

Lucas had more than an appropriate explanation for his apparent oversight.

"He said he wanted to dribble back towards the middle of the floor to force the help-side defender to get out of there, then come back on the drag and throw Dex the ball," Springmann related.

"I'm like, 'Good answer!' Heck, I was just going to say if the big guy has his hands up, throw him the ball."

Considering the difficulties the Longhorns had entering the post last season, either because the players didn't understand how to do so or were incapable of doing so because they couldn't shoot, such an advanced understanding of how to get Dexter Pittman the ball will serve the Longhorns extremely well next season.

Yet, Lucas will help the team in many more ways. A strong perimeter shooter, Lucas will open up room for the slashing games of Avery Bradley, Jordan Hamilton, and possibly Damion James, if he chooses to return. Lucas should also allow the Longhorns to effectively run more pick-and-roll basketball, though the lack of a Longhorn big reduces the possibilities with the play.

Most of all, Lucas should bring leadership to the program that was significantly lacking in 2008-09. Who was the heart and soul of that team? Was there a strong leader? There have always been huge expectations for Lucas -- basketball is the family business, as his father is known to say. The youngest Lucas dealt with those expectations the best way he could -- by working hard and never backing down, even when training with former and current NBA players, experience that will serve him well in his transition to point guard for the Longhorns. Known for being a tremendous and fearless competitor, Lucas will provide more than just on-court acumen -- he will be what a point guard should be, the unquestioned leader of the team. After all, his father asserts that the largest muscle in his son's body is an important one -- his heart.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Does Avery Bradley have a twin brother?
A strong perimeter shooter, Lucas will open up room for the slashing games of Avery Bradley, Jordan Hamilton, and possibly Avery Bradley, as well as Damion James, if he chooses to return.

Still a Blaine Irby fan

by patienthornsfan on May 7, 2009 5:37 AM CDT reply actions  

The article on Lucas is really insightful.

I hope everyone reads it.

"From the waist down, Earl Campbell has the biggest legs I have ever seen on a running back." -John Madden

by run Bevo run on May 7, 2009 7:20 AM CDT reply actions  

given corey nelson’s current like o A&M, the aggies have some legitimately good recruits looking at their program.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 7:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Continued OL Disappointment

I have to say that all issues with the Longhorns – the most disappointing is OL. TE is a bigger weakness, but that is due to injury and a shortage of talent. DT is a bigger weakness, but you get the feel that Muschamp will find a way to plug the hole.

With OL, it is loaded with VHT on a national level. They continue to let a very mobile QB get pounded. They have turned 3rd and 1 into a passing down. They have a 5 star recruit in Tray Allen looking like he won’t contribute much. Huey has been given playing time since his freshman year – and I wonder if he is poised to dominate his man this year.

Is it coaching? The scheme? Does it matter?

by realmccoy on May 7, 2009 8:31 AM CDT reply actions  

at some point, with the talent with have along the line, you have to blame the coaching and the scheme for the shortcomings. hopefully this year they’ll protect colt long enough for the deep ball, and open up enough holes for our running backs to pop off more 15-20 yard runs.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

OL disappointment?

Let’s see . . . . . Colt McCoy set an NCAA record for completion percentage; that record is more than just the QB and his receivers . . . . the tight end position was responsible for roughly half the sacks McCoy took last season, not the interior folks . . . linemen rarely drew penalties . . . what else do you want? THIS IS NOT an I-formation team. Mack talks the talk about the rushing game, but his schemes (well, GD’s, approved by Mack) don’t walk the walk.

I’m a long-time Tray Allen fan. I’ve been frustrated at his lack of production. But the hit-and-miss rushing attack is not a product of poor line play. It’s the system — and despite my old-school upbringing in football, I like the current system. It’s fun to watch. And (this still matters to some of us), IT WORKS.

by edsp on May 7, 2009 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

i just said what i wanted to see this year…. a bigger deep threat and more consistent rushing. not too much to ask for. we don’t know if the linemen could hold long enough to hit a deep receiver on a consistent basis because we were taking the 6-12yd routes instead, which is fine, but i’d like to see more vertical threat.

you said the OL schemes for rushing were ineffective yourself…. as such, i’d like to see the oline making holes for our rb to burst through with minimal effort on their part.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

IMO, Matthews is the least critical of the remaining '09 recruiting targets.

Our recruiting of OL recently has been perfectly satisfactory, although I agree to some extent that it looks like their productivity at the college level doesn’t quite square with their lofty rankings. The best thing about securing Matthews would be to screw agric. Nelson’s pattern has been to proclaim every succesive school that shows him some attention his new favorite. With coach Muschamp personally directing his recruitment, I think he’ll go to the good guys. It depends on Hicks, too.

I'll never forget ol' what's-his-name.

by Horntod on May 7, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

J. Charles

really hurt the running game when he left early. The OL was young his junior year, and they struggled. I think they will be better this year mixing the pass with the I.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

least critical, but a 5* get is a 5* get.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 12:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Matthews should wait

Sounds like he’s an aggy lean, which makes sense due to ties, proximity & style. However, it’s likely that the aggys will once again be bottom-feeders and not out of the realm of possibility that they’ll finish with 4-5 wins again. Given back to back horrific seasons, it’s very likely Sherman would be on the hotseat, which would mean a different system & coaching staff. If Matthews wants to go to ATM, he should wait to see if they have a pulse after the season. I would say ATM is the program with the least upside in the Big XII South and the one with the highest probability of massive coaching turnover within the next few years.

by Eskimohorn on May 7, 2009 1:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Valid points about Aggie

Reality is this: They were 4-8 and joke fodder around the state. A break-even season will provide positive momentum and save Sherman’s job. This year’s schedule has N. Mexico, Utah St., UAB, Iowa St., Baylor and Oklahoma St. at home; that’s 5 good chances for wins. Arkansas at JerryLand and trips to K-State and Colorado are winnable . . . 7-5 and a bowl would represent a nice bounce-back.

Long term (2-3 years ahead), I like the Aggies’ chances better than those of OSU, Tech and Baylor in the South.

by edsp on May 7, 2009 1:36 PM CDT reply actions  

you think oklahoma state at home for A&M is a winnable game? that’s a longshot at best. they lost to arkansas st. last year, let alone arkansas.

i dont think A&M is gonna walk into a .500 season, they’re gonna be lucky to get that.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I believe edsp....

……was saying 5 of the 6 are winnable.

--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---

by HornChamps on May 7, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

ah, didn’t notice there were 6 teams listed.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 7, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess they are winnable, but winnable doesn’t always translate to wins, of course. I really do hope Baylor and Okie State beat them, and it’d be great if one or two of the others could as well. Ideally TAMU would end up with no more than four wins again.

by burntorangehorn on May 7, 2009 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Aggy Chances

OSU is in many preseason Top 10’s. A&M hasn’t consistantly beaten Tech since the Fed-ex years. And, 2 of Baylors handful of Big XII wins in the past decade have come at the expense of aggy, with a blowout victory last year. ATM is the bottom feeder of the Big XII South and does not have a game-changer like Robert Griffin to keep games close. Other problems include:

1) Declining recruiting success (competing with Baylor & UH for recruits for the most part)
2) Uninspirational coaching & leadership
3) Depth & Talent issues across the board
4) Delusional fanbase

Meanwhile, Baylor has a talented coach with a proven track record at the college level and an acumen for recruiting in Texas. They also have a star in Robert Griffin.

Tech is consistantly a bowl team, with a system that works.

OSU continues to recruit their asses off and are poised to challenge UT & Ok State for the championship.

Aggies will be lucky to win two conference games this year. Had the aggies gone outside their comfort zone and hired Briles or Muschamp, they would be on track to rise above mediocrity.

by Eskimohorn on May 7, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

no disrespect

But, no, I don’t think OSU at Aggieville is a game A&M can win . . . I listed 6 home games and 5 good chances to win, plus two of the three away/neutral for a decent shot at 7 Aggie wins. I expect no worse than 6-6. But I thought Kansas would be 7-5 two years back, and they went 12-1.

by edsp on May 7, 2009 2:43 PM CDT reply actions  

I mean disrespect

aTm WILL NOT come close to beating OSU.. another blow out

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

J. Humphrey

is he still on the team? I read somewhere that he isn’t.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions  

He wasn’t practicing for a while due to his medical issue.

by burntorangehorn on May 8, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pro-Style

shouldn’t be the reason to go somewhere. USC is the ONLY team that is good that runs a pro-style offense. A&M will never have the talent to be good running a pro-style offense.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Other pro style offenses: Georgia, Bama, UNC and tOSU. I think Iowa and BC also fall into that category, though each offense does just enough to win.

Since the Greg Davis offense puts so little emphasis on drive blocking, yes, a OL with pro aspirations may have some reason to look elsewhere. Probably overblown, but it is a factor.

I don’t think Sherman is a good coach by any means, but he has 15 years of experience coaching OL. He can, and probably does, negative recruit based on our scheme to every lineman he can.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 8, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bama, tOSU

Bama wasn’t that good last year (favorable schedule for an SEC team). tOSU is trying to do the spread thing with Pryor. Geogia under achieves every year. I’m not even going to start on UNC.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 1:58 PM CDT reply actions  

I think he really meant that USC is the only good team offensively that runs a pro-style offense. Obviously UGA and ’Bama are good teams, but their offenses are generally not.

by burntorangehorn on May 8, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess that depends on what good is

Georgia was 22 in total offense last year, I would call that good.

by Wells on May 8, 2009 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t. Look at the schedule results. A so-so offense can put up 42 against Kentucky. A good one puts up more than 14 on South Carolina.

by burntorangehorn on May 8, 2009 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

You look at two games

I look at averages over the season, and they were the 22nd best.

by Wells on May 8, 2009 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Go ahead and look at the averages, but if you look at how their offense performed against any defense that was even average, you’re going to see that UGA was not very good on offense.

by burntorangehorn on May 9, 2009 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

By that logic, OU has a subpar offense

Because they were held to two touchdowns in a single game. If you’re trying to judge an offensive scheme en toto by individual examples then you can usually come up with whatever result you want. USC was held to 3 tds or less three times last season, so I’m unsure why you’re including them in the discussion aside from the urge to be contrary.

Apparently, you and L84 both wish to judge offenses on the VY-Longhorns, Tommy Phillips-Nebraska scale. If that’s correct, please enjoy watching a “good” offense every decade or so.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 9, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

huh, conjoined Tommy Frazier and Lawrence Phillips. Poor Ahman Green.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 9, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

usc

I’m not just talking about last year, I’m talking about the last few years.

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

It appears that you just don’t grasp what I’m saying. I’m not selectively judging a handful of games. I’m looking at the body of work, and that body of work does not show a very good offense for UGA. They were an average offense that only looked good when playing poor defenses.

by burntorangehorn on May 10, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

agree about Georgia

Alabama was one dimensional. Alabama had a crummy pass offense.

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

No I grasp it.

I just disagree. It doesn’t matter though because after reading your other posts I realize this debate was never worth my time.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 10, 2009 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

time?

if you come on here…you have time.

by Longhorns84 on May 13, 2009 1:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

no

I call a team a great/good offense if they score points and move the ball well against good teams. A good offense is a unit that I fear when my favorite team plays against them.

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 8:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

Georgia had the #1 QB and a very good RB with SOLID talent around them, and what did they do? I’m not just talking about this year, I’m talking about every year.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

won any championships

when was the last time Georgia won anything?

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

But is that a constructive measure of a good offense?

Tech has not won a national title or a Big 12 Championship in the entire time Leach has been head coach. Does that mean that they do not have a “good offense”?

by Wells on May 10, 2009 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tech's

offense didn’t look very good against ou, Baylor, or Ole’ Miss. Tech’s offense didn’t look good against Texas in the second half. I don’t think Tech’sffense is that great because they don’t run the ball well. If Tech learned how to mix it up better, they would be a better offense.

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't give a crap about stats either

If a team passes every play they will have a lot of passing yards.

by Longhorns84 on May 10, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

It depends on how you want to define "good"

From a fan’s point of view, “good” may mean racking up whacky final scores. From a coaches point of view, “good” will be more synonymous with its role in a winning game plan.

Pro style offenses tend to be ball control offenses, with time of possession being valued almost as highly as points generated and turnovers treated as an anathema. Teams like Bama, Georgia, and USC excel at executing their winning gameplan – which is to score and keep the other team from doing so. Some like USC, and score 30 pts a game while eating over half the clock. Others like Va Tech don’t, but as boring as I find beamer ball I find it difficult to argue with the results.

If a team has a good defense and a ball control offense like the bulldogs and averages between 25 and 32 pts per game, like they have for the last five years, that seems like more than enough to be considered “good”.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 8, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s really possible to categorize what is pro style. It’s much easier to say what isn’t, because the wishbone, flexbone, triple-option, etc. don’t exist in the NFL at all. But the vast majority of college teams play a form of offense that isn’t all that different in form or philosophy from something one can see in at least one game every Sunday. Ball-control offense exists in the NFL, yes, but a college ball-control offense usually doesn’t look like a professional ball-control offense like Pittsburgh’s. Georgia’s sure didn’t. And the low-turnover characteristic is supposed to be defining, then guys like Stafford and Matt Ryan would never have won the starting jobs in UGA or BC.

I think “pro-style offense” is just a throwaway term for a team that passes a lot from under center, usually from an I or modified-I set.

by burntorangehorn on May 8, 2009 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that the terms have been largely neutered of meaning

In my understanding, “pro style” is defined by larger a number of formations from which similar plays may be run, the retention of a possible “blocking surface” in the form of a tight end or fullback, and the quarterback under center.

That’s probably more accurately the Norm Chow approach to college pro style, but like anything else that works it has been copied extensively.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on May 9, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Georgia is loded with talent

and they have 0 championships since when?? Good = championships..or atleast good bowl games.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

USC

is the only good team in college football that has sucess running a pro-style offense. I don’t consider having one good year every now and then a good team (Georgia and UNC). tOSU has had sucess in the past, but mainly because they play in a slow Big 10. I’m pretty sure tOSU is trying to make the conversion to the spread as well ( I don’t know why if the pro-style offense is so great).

The only position that benefits from the pro-style offense is the QB and OL (maybe). I think the reand will change very soon though.

I would call the offense that the Patriots ran 2 tears ago when they went 18-1 was a spread offense. it will work with the right players in the NFL.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those positions may benefit when it comes time to try to enter the NFL, but I don’t think one could reasonably argue that any of these so-called pro-style offenses except USC is all that impressive. Teams that run what has apparently come to be called the pro-style offense in college generally don’t dominate on offense.

by burntorangehorn on May 9, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

dude

Bama won the SEC championship….

by GoComets! on May 8, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

i think florida took care of them. i could be wrong.

by Displaced Longhorn on May 8, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Alabama

played as weak as an SEC schedule as possible to get to the SEC championship game as possible.

by Longhorns84 on May 8, 2009 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR

Recent FanPosts

Small
Javan Felix Interview
Silhouette_bull_crop_small
OU 2012 FB Schedule
Caters-lizard-help-03_181614_small
Next Big Rivalry?
Ff_519532_xl_small
No love for Shakeem Jefferson
Small
Texas Women's Basketball
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Nike helmet redesign
Horns_small
Rivals 100 released
Small
Don't mess with Texas.
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Defense)
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Offense)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8