What Stat Will Predict the 2009 Season
At the beginning of the 2008 season the jury was still very much out on Colt McCoy. You worried he would struggle again with turnovers and Texas could expect another very solid but ultimately disappointing season. You know the team needed a big year from him to contend. Suddenly, your 2009 self appears and hands you a piece of paper, then disappears. It show glorious numbers, 3800 yds, 77% completion rate, 45 total TDs vs. 8 picks. You crumple the paper and walk away saying "Texas is winning a lot of games this year."
Cut to the present. Texas is a consensus top 3 team, with many of us expecting a national title. If you could phone your friends at the 2010 Elias Sports Bureau, what stat are you asking for (other than Wins-Losses you clever fellow) to predict if we won the BCS title or not? Even though Colt is still our most important player, his stat line probably won't give us the insight we want. Fairly or not, we expect a similarly outrageous year from him statistically regardless of how the season ends. The stats of "lesser" teammates, however, might reveal more details of the season. If I knew Malcolm Williams finished 2009 with say, 60 rec/960 yds/9 TDs I might reasonably infer that the offense successfully added a downfield component. Given how well I expect the short and mid-range passing game with Shipley and Collins to function, I would be even more confident about the season than I am now. Now some may think that's too low a prediction for Malcolm, others too high. But the point being that either way it tells us something significant about the 2009 offense.
This exercise is most interesting to me at the player level, because it's much easier to predict outcomes using team stats. To win a title we need further defensive improvement, so obviously PPG Against would largely answer our questions. But cutting deeper, we know that with a weakened pass rush the secondary needs to produce more turnovers. We know that our opponents are going to throw the ball a LOT. And as of now we expect Chykie Brown to be our shutdown corner. Given those facts, if Chykie Brown had 7 interceptions in 2009 I would feel pretty good. If he had 2 INTs, I would worry the defense hadn't made enough strides from last year to win a title. Now it's possible that Chykie only had 2 picks b/c teams just stopped throwing at him. Or maybe Curtis Brown made the leap and became the shutdown guy, getting 7 INTs himself. In either case the defense could have become elite without my chosen statistic revealing it. But if I've got the Elias guy on the phone, I'm rolling the dice with Chykie.
Some other telling stats might include Sam Acho sacks (We all expect Kindle to get his. Someone else needs to provide a pass rush when he gets doubled), DJ Grant receptions, and so on. Which stats do you think will tell us if Texas lives the dream again?
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Turnovers
I like anything turnover based. INTS, fumbles, apple, etc.
by UTexasCPA on Aug 11, 2009 12:47 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Totally agreed.
Turnovers are the most important thing for me to watch this year.
3 per game!!
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
I approve of this message
Turnovers are usually one of the most universally accurate indicators of success or not.
Jared Norton Tackles-
If he maintains or increases his mark of 54 tackles from last year, that would be a good indicator of how well the DTs are playing. The DTs need to eat up the blockers to prevent them from getting to the second level. Norton needs to be allowed to roam free and make tackles on the ball carrier so Muschamp doesn’t have to bring in a extra guy in the box against a team like Ok. St.
This has been on my mind too since I read the article I'm linking below:
If we’re to fit into this analysis, we’d have to make sure we’re in the top of:
Pass Defense Efficiency
Scoring Defense
I think we have the “Pass Efficiency” stat covered via Robo-Colt.
First thing that came to my mind too was Turnover ratio, but I’ll take a sick Pass Defense Efficiency or Scoring Defense stat over that any day. We can turn over the ball as much as we want, as long as they don’t score with it!
Injury reports
at DT, DE, and LB. That would be a pretty important stat.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
P.S. 45-35
Rushing Yards against us
and opponents time of possession will tell you everything this season
Hmm
What is the aggregate BAC of all 6th street patrons on 1/7/2010, when compared to 1/4/2006?
"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."
In all seriousness though
I’d like to see the takeaway/turnover ratio, if that makes sense
"Stats are for losers, I like winning games."
by SuperBentley on Aug 12, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Rushing by Running Backs
We need to find the way to spread Colts number of carries. Got to have top tier production out of running game to keep thin D-Line rested. I mean we need the 7 yds per carry kind of stuff on a consistant basis. McGee & Co. needs to hit holes with attitude this year and make a statement on every run. I read where Colt will be starting more under center this year. Maybe it’s a power move?
I can imagine it would also catch the interest of one I’m dubbing as “The Green Rose of San Antone”. This kid needs to be a Longhorn Mack!

by 




























