Race to the Roses September 21
This feels more like 2007 than 2005. In 2005, Texas and USC started atop the college football landscape, thoroughly dominated in every game but one each, and seemed to be on a predetermined collision course in Pasadena for the national title. In 2007, there were no dominant teams, and it was more the last two teams standing (Ohio St and LSU) after countless others (Missouri, West Virginia, USC, Oklahoma, Georgia, Virginia Tech) blew their chances. Although neither Texas nor Florida have relinquished their top spots in the first three weeks, neither has looked like USC or Texas of just a few years ago either.
This will be a weekly column moving forward, and thankfully I haven't had time to write it after the first two weeks of games. I'm sure it would have included some silly prognostications about USC being in better shape than Texas or BYU as a national championship sleeper or how Oklahoma State had a desirable schedule for an unlikely trip to respectability. Oh well, I'll start now and state the obvious: if Texas and Florida win out, they will play for the national title on January 8th.
As BZ touched on last week in the Pundit Roundup, college football is sadly controlled by a narrative as much as it is results on the field. California and Penn State could both go undefeated and would almost certainly be left out, given other undefeated teams remain. Even if the Gators stumble, given the perceptions of the Pac 10 and Big 10, another undefeated SEC team would be the more likely replacements in the national title game than perfect Golden Bears or Nittany Lions.
Realistically, we are already down to just seven teams which could go undefeated and play for the national title: Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, LSU, Texas, Penn State, and Cal. There are others who have already suffered a loss but who could have very impressive resumes should they run the table (OU, Oklahoma State, USC, Ohio State, and Virginia Tech), but none of them have a shot to leap back ahead of an undefeated team in the first group.
So, will two teams run the table and make the BCS system look like it "worked"? I have no idea but after the first three weeks and considering that four of the seven perfect teams are from the same conference, I wouldn't bet on two undefeated teams playing in Pasadena. Join me after the jump to take a closer look at each team's chances.
The Favorites:
1. Florida (3-0): Like the Longhorns, it is hard to say anything with certainty about this team. Wins over Charleston Southern and Troy are glorified scrimmages and a ten point home win over Tennessee is nice but hardly impressive. Again like Texas, it is survive and move on. The Gators avoid Mississippi and Alabama from the SEC West this season but must travel to LSU in three weeks, tangle with Georgia in Jacksonville on Halloween, and close the season with enigmatic Florida State at home.
Next Games: 9/26 at Kentucky, 10/3 Bye, 10/10 at LSU
2. Texas (3-0): I want to believe in this team but can't. Not yet. Texas' first three games mirror those of the Gators: two wins over grossly inferior competition and a solid, yet flawed 10 point home victory over a conference opponent. Fans have to be pleased with Jordan Shipley, with the Texas pass rush, and with the Horns' ability to kick-start their offense in the second half but the slow starts, the play of the offensive line, and the depth issues caused by grades and injuries are still troubling. Texas should coast to 5-0 before heading into a tough three-game stretch in October.
Next Games: 9/26 UTEP, 10/3 Bye, 10/10 Colorado
The Contenders:
1. Alabama (3-0): An opening season win over ACC-contending Virginia Tech will be the best nonconference win of any of the teams listed here. Also, Bama has a manageable schedule, avoiding Georgia and Florida and drawing LSU at home. Other potential stumbling blocks include a trip to Mississippi in three weeks and a season-closing road game with Auburn.
Next Games: 9/26 Arkansas, 10/3 @ Kentucky, 10/10 @ Mississippi
2. Mississippi (2-0): The Rebels have the easiest possible conference schedule as they miss Florida and Georgia and get LSU and Alabama at home. They'll get their first chance to prove themselves worthy of their top-five ranking this Thursday at South Carolina.
Next Games: 9/24 @ S. Carolina, 10/3 @ Vanderbilt, 10/10 Alabama
3. LSU (3-0): The Tigers' schedule is as dirty as the Ole Miss schedule is favorable. LSU travels to Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama and has a home tilt with Florida too. Just to get to 10-2 would probably include a road victory over a top five team.
Next Games: 9/26 @ Miss State, 10/3 @ Georgia, 10/10 Florida
Need Help:
1. California (3-0): The Golden Bears survived their biggest nonconference test with two late TDs to pull away from Minnesota and now start round robin Pac 10 play. The very good news is that Cal gets USC and Oregon State at home. Their scariest road game might be this weekend in Eugene. With Jahvid Best running the ball and a lot of good but not great conference foes ahead, expect Cal to stay near the top of the polls for a long time.
Next Games: 9/26 @ Oregon, 10/3 USC, 10/10 @ UCLA
2. Penn State (3-0): Texas fans complaining about our nonconference schedule should look to Happy Valley for familiarity-Akron, Syracuse, Temple, and Eastern Illinois (all at home). The Nittany Lions should easily be 7-0 when they travel to Michigan on 10/24. Their only other real test will come on November 7th when they host Ohio State. With the potential of playing just two ranked teams all season, Penn State fans should be rooting hard for Cal and Texas losses.
Next Games: 9/26 Iowa, 10/3 at Illinois, 10/10 E. Illinios
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
you left one out
IF Miami goes undefeated – and thats a huge if because the canes would have to beat Va Tech and OU in the next two weeks – it will be in the picture.
by Texastough on Sep 21, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
was going to say the same...
they deserve to be mentioned as the 1500 pound gorilla in the rearview mirror, especially if they win the next 2.
by silky51 on Sep 21, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Miami is elite
They barely beat a wishy-washy FSU team, and Georgia Tech is not very good.
FSU win: FSU did dominate BYU, but they barely beat Ryan Perrilloux and repeatedly blew coverages against Miami. I believe Jacory (sp?) Harris and Jimmy Clausen are tied in the “Undue Heisman Dark Horse Hype caused by jump balls and fast receivers” category.
Georgia Tech win: GT is a ramblin’ wreck, all right. They were just waiting on someone to expose them and Miami did so. Watching the GT-Clemson game, GT scored on an 80 yard run that Clemson misplayed, and then scored two TD’s on special teams due to Clemson being just stupid as can be. They then gave up their huge lead before putting together a few field goal drives to win. GT’s offense is very poorly conditioned. They get gassed before halftime and not much can be expected of them after that.
Miami will lose multiple games in ACC play. They may beat the Sooners, but really, who doesn’t these days?
by Horn Brain on Sep 21, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
GT looks like the most out of shape team in college football...nt
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Sep 21, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta call it like you see it
There’s a chance that even if Cal goes undefeated, its only victory over a ranked opponent will be USC. Likewise, Penn State has but Michigan and Ohio State on the schedule. Neither team would need to play a conference championship game, either.
Scoff at the U if you must, but if they win their next two, they’ll have wins over four ranked opponents in a row: #18 FSU, #14 GT, #11 VT, and #10 OU. From there, the rest of their schedule looks like cupcakes in comparison. If you’re going to recognize Cal and Penn State as “need help” contenders, I think Miami should be there too.
by jc25 on Sep 21, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's the problem with your analysis:
You did some.
See, the media and the coaches won’t look at this like you did. I applaud you for that, but the polls won’t reflect this thought process. They’ll only reflect the records. The closest that they’ll come to comparing quality teams is if BYU runs the table (they very well may) then they’ll look at the FSU game against BYU because it was such a drubbing. Other than that, GT won’t get any play in the discussion.
by GoHorns on Sep 21, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Miami Fan
I’ve been a big Canes fan since I was a little kid, and they are not there yet.
They’ve won their first two but I still don’t see them in the same discussion as the teams listed above. I could be proven wrong with wins over Va Tech and OU. However, because I’m a betting man, I’ll predict they’ll be 2-2.
--AW--
by awiggo on Sep 21, 2009 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup agreed!!!
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
by Sunkist on Sep 21, 2009 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't laugh, but you forgot Cincinnati
I know, I know, Cincinnati would have to go at the bottom of the list of unbeatens from BCS conferences having a shot of getting to Pasadena.
But having said that, I think the Bearcats have to be included on the list. Having watched about 30 seconds of Bearcat football this fall, I can’t comment at all on how good I think they are. But they already have road victories over Rutgers and Oregon State, and they might be favorites in each of their games the rest of the way as they navigate the oh-so-tough Big East.
Given that, and given that I agree completely that this season will probably look a lot more like 2007 than 2005 when it’s all said and done, if Cincinnati is the only undefeated team (or one of two) from a BCS conference, are they Pasadena bound (regardless of whether we’d think they’re truly one of the best two teams in the land)?
Formerly kjm017
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2009 3:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oct. 10 is shaping up to be a lot of fun
Glad we’re playing CU that day as it looks tailor made for an Upset Saturday Special.
I was also thinking that this season felt a lot like 2007 with no real front runners and every team vulnerable. Sucks too, because it shouldn’t have to be like that for Texas. We’ve got the horses to be really dominant, but for some reason, we just haven’t clicked fully yet.
My only explanation for this is the pressure of going undefeated. Once teams lose, they seem to stop thinking about titles and just concentrate on winning the game in front of them.
I’ll get to test my theory this weekend when 1 loss teams V-Tech, Arkansas, and Texas Tech play undefeated and much hyped Miami, Bama, and Houston. I’m betting they give them all they can handle.
Hopefully we get things straightened out by 10/17…you can talk all you want about taking them one game at a time and having heart to heart talks with your QB about relaxing and just having fun, but that’s all bullsh*t unless you win.
Long, crazy season…hell, OU’s already back in the Top 10. WTF?
Be nobody but yourself in a world that desperately wants you to be like everybody else.
by 54b on Sep 21, 2009 3:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Basketball commentary
When are you going to start doing your basketball commentary?
by Kafka on Sep 21, 2009 4:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure
Txtwstr is taking the once a week look at the bball team during the run up to the beginning of the year. I’ll try to chime in soon but probably won’t start posting regularly about basketball until late-October/early-November.
First real game is November 15th.
Hope you’re looking forward to bball season as much as I am.
--AW--
by awiggo on Sep 21, 2009 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
2005 vs. 2007
I think the jump to label this season the next 2007 is premature. If Texas and Florida both play well over the next three weeks, and if we beat OU on 10/17, I think the feeling that we are on a collision course for Pasadena will cement itself.
While looking back on ’05 we often remember it as USC and Texas all season long at 1 and 2, dominating most teams and clearly positioned at the top of the college football universe. But Penn State was undefeated through the middle of October and, while not as dominant as either UT or USC, seemed like they could make a case for the national championship game.
Plus, we forget that both Texas and USC had a few scary games each in 2005. They didn’t beat every team by 40-50 points. Texas had Ohio State, OK State (down big in the first half), and the A&M game that probably cost Vince the Heisman.
USC beat Arizona State by 10, probably should have been beat by Notre Dame, and were scared by Fresno State in their second to last regular season game.
Not to say that 2009 is a repeat of 2005, or that it won’t turn out to be similar to 2009. I just think it’s premature to talk season-long narrative after the third week. And as far as 2007 Texas goes, I think that team would have gotten beat on Saturday. Our defense now is light-years ahead of the 2007 version, and our offense has been productive enough even with Colt playing below our expectations, Tre Newton only emerging last game as a capable starting back, and some bad turnovers.
If we still are playing this way before Oklahoma, count me as one of the concerned. But I’m not ready to give up on this team’s potential for dominance.
by hornalum08 on Sep 21, 2009 5:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
2005 only looks like 2005 in hindsight. In 2005, it looked a lot like this season.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 21, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OU...
…is the most challenging game on the schedule, once again. I think that this Texas team has a lot of progress to make if they want to win the game at the Cotton Bowl. OU, sans Bradford, has showed an ability to rack up points, albeit against inferior competition. But I don’t feel like Texas has dominated any team in that manner, even with Colt at the helm. If we can’t move the ball and score points against OU in the first half, then we may be on the outside looking in.
by brownf on Sep 21, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
afraid of that too
But lets wait until OU plays somebody. 2 games against JV teams aren’t enough to tell us yet. The Miami game should.
by Texastough on Sep 21, 2009 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















