Snap Shots: 3rd and 8 Against Tech
The Big Picture
After the first three games, one thing is clearly apparent about the offense -- it's not operating at the same high level it was last season, prompting Mack Brown to call it a "work in progress." There are several factors that have contributed to the sub-par pay -- spotty pass protection and run blocking by the offensive line, decreased accuracy by Colt McCoy, his over reliance on Jordan Shipley, and, relatedly, McCoy not properly going through his reads. The following play opening the fourth quarter against Texas Tech perfectly illustrates the last two problems -- McCoy's over reliance on Shipley and his poor job going through his reads.
The Context
Texas opens the fourth quarter up by a touchdown with a critical 3rd and 8 just inside Texas Tech territory on a promising drive highlighted by consecutive completions to Dan Buckner totaling 30 yards. A Tre' Newton carry on first down netted four yards, but Texas Tech blew up the subsequent speed option play (it's hard to see how because the Longhorns quick snap the ball and the cameras don't catch the critical first second of the play) on second down, forcing McCoy to pitch early and resulting in a loss of two yards by Newton -- the play hasn't worked well the last several weeks, in large part because McCoy isn't attacking the line of scrimmage quickly enough and/or the blocking hasn't been good for the play. McCoy and the line have to start executing better on the play or it's not worth running because of the potential to lose yardage and put the offense behind schedule, something it can't afford as much this season. The failed second down play leaves the Longhorns in a third and long situation.
The Play in Pictures

The Longhorns open in a five-wide receiver set, but it's difficult to tell the exact personnel. Marquise Goodwin is at the top of the screen next to Jordan Shipley, with Dan Buckner in the flex and James Kirkendoll in the slot. It looks like Tre' Newton or DJ Monroe may be split wide to the bottom of the screen. Texas Tech has only three down linemen, two linebackers and six defensive backs and is playing with two safeties deep. Notice that Jordan Shipley is matched up against linebacker Marlon Williams, a mismatch that Colt McCoy surely notices immediately, meaning that he probably makes up his mind about where is going with the football before the play even begins.

The two receivers at the bottom of the screen both apparently run go routes (they exit the screen shortly) to clear out the bottom side of the field for the crossing route Jordan Shipley is about to run. Notice that Williams seems to anticipate the crossing route by Shipley and I'm willing to bet that's because the Longorns ran this exact same play 10-20 times last season and often with great success. Shipley stutter steps to try to freeze Williams, but the linebacker isn't going to give him an easy inside release. Notice also that Dan Buckner is turning inside to run a post route to occupy both the left safety and the cornerback. The cornerback at the top of the screen is about to hand off Goodwin to the safety on that side of the field. It's difficult to tell exactly where McCoy is looking, but judging by his likely pre-snap read and the direction of his helmet, he's staring down Shipley the whole way and ignoring his other two reads on the play: first, Buckner on the post and, second, Goodwin on his go route. (Note: I'm not 100% sure of the order of Colt's reads, but considering the depth of the routes, Buckner first and then Goodwin second makes the most sense to me.)

Just as the cornerback covering Dan Buckner jams him, essentially conceding a clean release inside by Buckner on the post and relying on help coverage from the left safety over the top, McCoy sees Shipley about to gain a step on the flat-footed linebacker. If McCoy looks deep, the right safety will either start into his backpedal to try to keep up with an international track star (hint: it won't work well) and McCoy will have a brief window of opportunity to thread the ball into Buckner or the safety will bite on the post and leave Goodwin completely free. Either way, Goodwin will be open -- he's not even with the safety yet, but he's sure as hell leavin'. Backpedalling is not a good way to keep up with international track stars. McCoy has an opportunity to look down the field, as an offensive lineman is about to make a nice tackle on a Tech defender to keep the pocket clear for the quarterback.
The cornerback covering Dan Buckner, apparently reading McCoy's eyes all the way, leaves his man to jump the underneath crossing route. The left safety, recognizing that neither of the receivers running go routes to the bottom of the formation are threats, heads to cover Buckner on the post, while the right safety begins to backpedal to cover Goodwin.

Shipley never has a chance to pick up the first down, even though he beat the linebacker, because the cornerback was well versed in what Texas wanted to do on the play, as was the left safety, who knew that the post by Buckner was a primary read and arguably takes away the route. Based on the accuracy standards set by McCoy last season, the post to Buckner is still a throw that he can make with the proper timing, but it would be a close play. If McCoy looks downfield at Buckner, he might force the cornerback to stay with the big receiver and give Shipley the step that he needs against the cornerback to pick up the first down or at least have a much better chance of doing so.

FAIL. Time to punt!
The Goodwin Corollary
Back to Marquise Goodwin. The true freshman speedster is on the field for a reason -- because of his sick speed and the pressure that puts on the defense. If you have a recording of the game, rewatch the play just to get a look at Goodwin's speed, which obviously doesn't translate to pictures. Let's look at another angle conveniently supplied by the producers at ESPN:

In the above angle, Goodwin gets jammed by the cornerback as he passes him off to the flat-footed safety, who, as mentioned earlier, has no chance to keep up with Goodwin at this point.

Yeah, good luck with that backpedal, buddy.
Just for further proof, check out the above shot. This type of coverage on the top side of the formation on this play is going to be typical this season when the Longhorns go to five-wide sets. Often, the receiver matched with Jordan Shipley on one side of the field will be Goodwin or DJ Monroe running a go route, the same pattern against similar coverage that Clemson used with CJ Spiller to pick up big yardage against Georgia Tech earlier this year and the same pattern against similar coverage that used to give Missouri absolute fits last year. Running a go route down the sideline against a two deep safety look was guaranteed yardage against the Tiger secondary. If the Longhorns want to increase the number of big plays in the offense, looking for Goodwin or Monroe on these type of plays is a good place to start. It may be that McCoy needs more time with both players to create the type of timing and trust that will allow him to uncork some throws deep down the field, but judging by how much separation Goodwin is about to create, McCoy could probably underthrow him by about 10 yards and still have a touchdown.
Manipulate them, Colt!
Furthermore, opponents are doing a better job this season taking away the crossing routes to Shipley that the Longhorns used so often last season on third down with so much success. Wyoming smothered the route last week and Tech did a good job of defending this week. Even though Shipley has an advantageous match up against a linebaker, that's not always enough, especially if McCoy is going to stare down Shipley the whole time. If McCoy refuses to throw to Buckner or Goodwin on the play, that's fine, but he has to better use his eyes to manipulate defenders or the Longhorns are going end up with a lot of completions to Shipley this season that fall short of the first down.
The Verdict
It's a well-designed play and one that the Longhorns love to run, so it doesn't need to be scrapped from the playbook, even though the defense pretty much knows what is coming. The problem is with the execution, particularly by McCoy. He either needs to look deep to Goodwin, hit Buckner coming out of his break, or use his eyes to manipulate the defenders to get Shipley more time to get separation from the linebacker. If the Longhorns can force defenses to adjust to the route by having the cornerback try to stay with the receiver all the way down the field, Shipley could run an option route and go outside if the linebacker doesn't want to give him a release inside and pick up the first down with the room created by the cornerback heading down the field.
Until McCoy becomes more comfortable with the other receivers on the field and stops leaning so heavily on Jordan Shipley, the Longhorns will struggle at times converting third downs. While the two-deep coverage Texas is seeing a lot right now, and will continue seeing, usually keeps everything in front of the safeties, the go route Goodwin is running will almost always get past the safety unless he starts getting depth as soon as or right before the cornerback jams the receiver, especially with receivers as fast as Goodwin and Monroe. In other words, it's a coverage beater and McCoy needs to adjust.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Analysis
I think that Colt last year had great trust in both Quan and Jordan. He distributed it pretty evenly among both of them and on any given play the defense could not focus in on one player. For whatever reason, he doesn’t have that same connection with any of the new guys and this allows the defense to give Shipley extra attention to take away the YAC. I am hopeful that Colt will continue to build trust in Buckner because that will open stuff up again.
I seem to remember Colt having trouble with having to make too many reads
Didn’t we simplify his passing scheme at the end of 2007 / 2008?
Have we made it complicated again hoping he’d perform better after a year of playing?
Offense was a little more simplified last year.
I don’t think Davis has made it more complicated, but it’s hard to tell. It looks like the general principles are the same — last season I think the emphasis was on Colt not always checking out of a play at the line of scrimmage if he saw something he could exploit. In a sense, he was always trying to get the offense into the perfect play. That’s my understanding of what was going on. I’m not sure that’s the case here.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 23, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I Will Be Shocked If 09 Offense is not Better than 08 at EOY
Do I just have burnt orange colored glasses on? I really see this slump (of 134 points in 3 games) is simply Colt getting on the same page as some of his new weapons. In the long term, we have much more dangerous options in 09 than 08. The addition of Chiles, Monroe, Goodwin, and Buckner make Colt’s receivers virtually uncoverable. The running game is slightly better than 08. Colt will be Colt and this offensive will be extremely explosive, much more than last year’s addition.
I'm kind of on this boat too
But it is worrysome to keep waiting and making excuses for Colt. I expected him to have a breakout game against Tech, and it didn’t happen.
I expected a little bit more along the lines of 41 – 24 or even 44 – 17 at the Tech game, which would have been the case if we were functioning on offense like we should.
Mack is starting to get frustrated too, he talks about it a little bit during his press conference from Monday… he puts a lot of emphasis on the fact that the offense has a lot to work on.
Work in progress
First, nice read and great depth in expanding upon your point.
Second, this team remains a work in progress, particularly on offense. Keep in mind that colt wasn’t 100% which didn’t help. Comfort levels will grow and we have 2 tuneups and an extra week to prepare for OU then the 2 more tough games to follow.
Third, it would appear we have a real running threat, this will play volumes to our future success.
I for one am going to enjoy the year and not get too overwhelmed by problems that appear very fixable.
Good read
Excellent Writeup.
With the pictures, I was able to see everything you were describing and got the clear picture. I was at this game so I haven’t had a chance to rewatch it, but from re-watching the LA Monroe game and the Wyoming game, it does appear that McCoy is leaning too heavily on Shipley. Maybe Brandon Collins’ suspension is hurting us more than we think. He might not be too much more talented than any of the other receivers, but he definitely appeared to have Colt’s trust.
Why haven't I read this feature before now?
This is great stuff GoBR!
I’m with the crowd that thinks that Colt’s just overthinking the offense and trying too hard to squeeze it into Shipley’s hands. Once he settles down and gets a better feel for his other receivers, he’ll be lethal again.
I remember watching this play live and seeing that Colt’s head never left Shipley. If it wasn’t this play, I won’t be shocked. He seemed to do that several times through-out the game. Either way, I knew exactly where he was going with the ball and I haven’t played football since jr high. If I can figure it out that easy, I KNOW the defense can.
Colt
Good stuff. As you show above, Colt is making the field much smaller for the defense. He also is not doing Jordan any favors. That corner now has a license to blow Jordan up with only a very short gain to show for it.
Good stuff
Surprised at how much Goodwin got to play, and you provided a good reason why he is playing as much as he is.
He was the receiver Colt targeted downfield on the flea flicker.
Yup
He also overthrew him in a little hitch route where he was open, too. The flea flicker was well covered and Colt shouldn’t have thrown that ball because pretty much the entire secondary got back to cover the play. John Chiles was the check down receiver on that play standing at the line of scrimmage and there wasn’t anyone with 10 or 15 yards of him, he could have had a nice pick up had Colt not wasted that throw down field.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 23, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
While I appreciate creativity
I was not happy with the flea flicker. It came before we even established the run with Newton. The funny thing is that my friend next to me at the stadium half-jokingly predicted the flea flicker because we ran the Wildhorn, the Q, Mad Cow, or whatever we will call it and also ran that bizarre reverse throw with Colt. I felt GD wasted downs on numerous drives with some ill-timed playcall, although to be fair, Colt was just not very accurate on Saturday. And like you said, the flea flicker “works” if Colt doesn’t just chuck a prayer downfield.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 23, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions
MAD COW!!!!!
Yes! Perfect name. Not PC enough for Mack to rename it to this?
With regard to the speed option mentioned in paragraph 2...
I was at the game and I specifically remember that Colt never made the defender commit. He pitched to Newton when the defender was still three yards away leaving the defender to simply turn and tackle Newton. Colt needed to either turn upfield and gain what he could, or hold on to the ball longer and force the defender to leave his pitch responsibilities.
GBR, nice breakdown of that 3rd down play but...
Colt.had.no.energy
QB Colt McCoy
On having the flu: I don’t think it affected me much mentally. I feel like I was mentally prepared for the game. The first half I just had no energy and I felt weak. I felt drained. I would come back to the sidelines and my arms and legs would be shaking. I just didn’t have any energy. I came in at halftime and ate a bunch, drank a lot of fluids and got recharged for the second half. I thought I played really well. I don’t think I missed a ball in the second half. I don’t know why I got the flu, but I was able to overcome it in the second half and play pretty well.
And you even aluded to this in your post earlier in the week:
McCoy looked much more comfortable after his PB&J and Pedialyte, making accurate throws on each of the third-down conversions and only staring Shipley down when he knew that he had a match up to exploit. That’s a major improvement over the second half of the Wyoming game, when nearly all of his incomplete passes came after staring down Shipley.
We all can agree the offense is still working on game synchronicity. If everyone recalls, we were discussing similar issues last year. And, ly 3rd down efficiency was a crazy outlier and really should not be used as a benchmark for comparison. However, no excuses for the less than acceptable first half offensive performance.
Circle of trust
It isn’t easy getting into Colt’s circle of trust. Ship is in the circle and Buckner is, too (I think). I think Kirk is in the circle but he only caught one pass Saturday so I’m not sure. Chiles is on the edge of the circle.
The ease of the throw may have been one of the reasons Colt threw to Ship on that play. The throw to Goodwin was more difficult and, of course, Goodwin is not yet in Colt’s circle of trust. It is shocking how fast Goodwin or Monroe (or Ship, Kirk, or Chiles for that matter) can fly by a safety.
Love this detailed approach to a post, great stuff. Illustrating the general idea with a detailed example is awesome.
That was Chiles
the first time Colt over threw him he dropped his hands to keep from tipping it. I can’t blame him for trying to make a play while our offense was struggling. Plus it was fairly close to the sideline rather than in the middle of the field where you know a safety is just waiting.
by Longhorn in MO on Sep 23, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions
actually...
….the tip that resulted in a int was M. Williams IIRC.
by vy til i die on Sep 23, 2009 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Two tipped passes led to interceptions.
The first was Chiles on the sideline in the 1st half and the second was M. Williams over the middle of the field in the 4th quarter just after Potts threw the interception to Earl Thomas.
by HornPossessed on Sep 23, 2009 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Speed option
I don’t like to see Colt running the ball on the speed option because of the risk/reward.
Running the sprint draw with an optional handoff to the TB might be more effective. The D has to honor Colt when he rolls out to pass so when Colt hands off to the TB, the D is going the wrong way and the blocks are set up for the OL (i.e. similar to the way a counter sets up blocks for the OL). When Colt does not hand off to the TB, he can either pass or continue his run towards the sideline. The roll out makes it tough to pressure Colt and reduces stress on the OL. If Colt does decide to run, there is a decent chance he can get out of bounds without taking a big hit. If he does get hit, it is probably by a DB rather than the DL or LBs.
Great Post
The pictures with your breakdown was very helpful. Great read and thanks for all the hard work you guys do to keep this site my only stop for Longhorns football fix.
New Offensive Focus
After 3 games, I am wondering more about what is NOT being mentioned. For the past 5 years (or so) we’ve run the Zone Read out of the spread formation. That’s been the primary offense. Now, Colt’s Sr year – we change that focus. Colt’s still operating out of the shotgun, but there is no running threat at all (not from him or the RBs) – and I despise our slow developing running plays. They don’t work. To the coaches’ credit , they finally switched to a straight-forward power run game in the 2nd half against Tech and it worked. Just curious – but does no one else think abandoning the Zone Read has anything to do with the inconsistent offense?
thanks
I kept thinking (loudly to myself) during the first half of the Tech game: “’Where’s our 2008 offense?” and “why do you change the offense on a senior Heisman Trophy Finalist?” I think we’ll be OK – but I don’t think we’ll ever have a consistent offense under pressure against equal talent until we go to the power running game as the default and save those slow developing counter-tres for the exception.
Bravo
That’s outstanding stuff. Please do more.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Thank you
The pictures help a lot for people like me who want to better understand football
ditto again
I know most swimmers are excellent football x and o guys…. but I guess I am the exception to many rules.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
I could be way offbase...
but it seems to me that Colt has never really been great at the long throws. I don’t know his % on deep balls, just kind of going on memory, so definitely might be wrong. I know there have been a few of those he’s very memorably completed – Williams in Lubbock sure springs to mind – but he’s either underthrown or overthrown a bunch of the deep ones. I’m wondering if that’s why he so quickly ignores Goodwin here.
This year’s receivers are much bigger deep threats than last year’s. I think Colt should be more aggressive in going after those. He throws just a couple of those against defenses like the ones here, and they’ll have to really make some adjustments, which will open up the field for throws like this one. Even incompletions would be a little worrisome reminder for DCs…
Damn I miss that dude
I sure hope the 3rd coming of #4 is….. well, the 3rd coming.
Still a Blaine Irby fan
by patienthornsfan on Sep 24, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
McCoy staring down Shipley / other receivers
is nothing new. I’ve been watching him do this since his freshman year, and it is a very scary thing.
The swine flu takes a Will Muschamp shot every September.
by pleaseplaykindle on Sep 23, 2009 5:38 PM CDT reply actions
I agree
It does seem, however, that in college you can get away with this a little more than NFL. Still, he should be comfortable enough to look off safeties in this offense. After all, he has been running it for a few years.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
Evolution of the Offense
I nice adjustment for Colt to make when the defenses are collapsing on targets would be to pump fake. I wonder how much of the playbook we have seen to date. I was at the game last weekend. There were new wrinkles as many have noted here. I believe we need to run all of our offense over the next few weeks at game speed to get it down and not save something for the tougher games. When we bring our “A” game we can beat all of our conference opponents.
Excellent write up
Suggestion though— arrows or something like that on the actual images might make it a little easier. Either way, interesting and informative. Thanks.
If anyone has suggestions
for a good program to do that on a Mac, I’ll check it out. Preferably free.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 24, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions
I use paint on Windows for my work computers, and I forget what I usually use on my Macs at home, but I’ll see if I can check once I’m home.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 24, 2009 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Aviary Suite
Free web-based editing apps. Falcon would be the one you’d want for adding arrows and whatnot (click “Image Markup” button to launch).
I know I may be oversimplyfying here...
but don’t you think we are using these first five games to work out all the kinks? I mean Colt is going with practically a whole new set of WRs except for Jordan especially with Brandon Collins no longer playing. Now that Buckner has moved in to the TE spot, Jordan has moved out so he isn’t playing out of that TE at all. Not to sound arrogant, but I think we all felt that the 1st five games were winnable and that those games don’t help us any in the rankings unless we lose. OU, KU, MU, and OSU are the meat of our schedule & will be what solidifies our #2 ranking or what causes us to tumble. As long as the team is learning each game what works & doesn’t work as well as getting more comfortable to new roles & expectations, I am just a ok with that is going on. I am confident that Colt will let loose against UTEP and CU to help ease any concerns…
Nice break down
Agreed that the progression should start with Buckner, but not because he’s on a deep route, rather because forcing the corner to commit to Buckner is crucial to maximizing the mismatch on the higher percentage play — Shipley’s shallow cross with an LB trying to cover.
Assuming there’s no immediately recongnizable mismatch, then yes, progressions should run deep to shallow.
I say,
Thah Guvnah

by 






























