Race to the Roses September 28
Saturday after Saturday, the unbeatens continue to fall. A week ago, I proclaimed that, after three short Saturdays, we were already down to just seven teams who could go undefeated and have a legitimate claim to a spot in the national title game. Well, three of those seven (Mississippi, Penn State, and Cal) just lost. While it is way too early in the season to say that the title race is down to only four teams, those four (Florida, Alabama, LSU, and Texas) should each feel secure that they control their own destiny. Style points certainly matter for the bunch of one-loss teams, but for those four, it's win and move on.
Because Florida, LSU, and Alabama all reside in the SEC, there can be no more than two undefeated teams from the remaining bunch of four. This should be particularly uplifting for one-loss teams like, Virginia Tech, USC, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and even Ohio State, Penn State, and Cal.
I am not forgetting about the other undefeated teams: Boise State, TCU, Houston, and Cincinnati either. (Note: Kansas, Missouri, Texas A&M, Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin, South Florida, UCLA, and Auburn all also undefeated.)
On first glance, Boise State at #5 looks to be in the best position to earn a shot in Pasadena, but they went undefeated last year and played in a late December bowl. The Broncos don't have another ranked team on their schedule and an opening game home win over Oregon won't be enough. Boise State is in the best position to earn an automatic BCS berth from a non-automatic qualifier league.
TCU (#10) already owns road wins over Virginia and Clemson and will have the chance to add to their resume with trips to Air Force and to BYU in November. Still, running the table for TCU would only include one win over a ranked team.
Houston has two wins over Big XII schools including a win over then-#5 Oklahoma State. The Cougars have five of their next seven on the road but none will likely come against a ranked opponent. U of H could run the table if their offense continues to be sharp, but their chance to really impress has passed and they sit only at #12 in the latest Coaches poll. A ride into the top two is not possible.
Cincinnati (#11) is a little different from the other three listed here. Should the Bearcats win the Big East, undefeated or not, they will automatically earn a berth in a BCS game. You can debate the fairness of including the Big East over the Mountain West, WAC, or C-USA if you like. Cincy's resume includes a win at Oregon State and a home victory over Fresno State. However, unless South Florida jumps in the top 25, they could easily win out without ever facing a ranked opponent. The Big East is obviously the weakest of the BCS conferences, so the chances of even an undefeated champion playing for the national title remain slight.
A look at the top contenders after the jump...
The Favorites:
1. Florida (4-0): The Gators looked more like defending national champs on Saturday as they notched an impressive conference road win over Kentucky. However, things are still far from right in Gainesville. Tim Tebow entered the game reportedly suffering from the flu, along with a few other Gators, and left the game with a concussion. A bye week couldn't have come a better time.
Next Games:10/3 Bye, 10/10 at LSU, 10/17 Arkansas
2. Texas (4-0): Longhorn fans finally saw the complete performance on both sides of the ball they we've been waiting for. The defense was downright nasty, and, after the pick six, the offense raced up and down the field impressively. An off week and a spanking of the Colorado Buffaloes await, before the ‘Horns start the three game stretch which will decide their season.
Next Games:10/3 Bye, 10/10 Colorado, 10/17 OU (Dallas)
3. Alabama (4-0): I'm moving ‘Bama into this category because they control their own destiny, and more importantly, they look the part. The Alabama defense is already elite, and the sometimes stagnant offense as been nearly as impressive. Behind junior quarterback Greg McElroy and sophomore back, Mark Ingram, Alabama is averaging over 40 points per game. An SEC title game match-up with Florida is something all college football fans should be rooting for.
Next Games: 10/3 @ Kentucky, 10/10 @ Mississippi, 10/17 South Carolina
The Contenders:
1. LSU (4-0): Sure, LSU controls its own destiny too but needing a goal line stand to win at Mississippi State doesn't do it for me. Plus, the Tigers' schedule is just ridiculous starting with a trip to Athens this weekend. Just winning one of the next two seems like a daunting task
Next Games: 10/3 @ Georgia, 10/10 Florida, 10/24 Auburn
2. Oklahoma (2-1): Don't look now but the Sooners are back in the top ten. OU also has more than enough chances to impress moving forward: three of their next four come against ranked opponents at either neutral sites or on the road. Fans of other one-loss teams may argue but if OU runs the table, their body of work will stand above anyone else's.
Next Games: 10/2 @ Miami, 10/10 Baylor, 10/17 Texas (Dallas)
Need Help:
1. Virginia Tech (3-1): It is fairly easy to dismiss the Big East champ, but not as easy to dismiss the Hokies should they win out. Va Tech already has wins over Nebraska and Miami and could add wins over potentially ranked Georgia Tech and North Carolina. The last third of their schedule is pretty weak, though, so style points may matter more to the Hokies than to anyone else. That said, Frank Beamer's club would probably not be ranked above a one-loss Big XII champ or above a one-loss USC.
Next Games: 10/3 @ Duke, 10/10 Boston College, 10/17 @ Georgia Tech
2. USC (3-1): The modius operandi of the Trojans in recent years has been to win their nonconference games, drop their Pac 10 opener to an unranked opponent, and then either run the table or come close. So, things are going according to plan. It won't be easy to win out this season. The Trojans go to Cal, to Notre Dame, and at Oregon before closing with three straight at home.
Next Games: 10/3 @ Cal, 10/10 Bye, 10/17 @ Notre Dame
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t want to see any UT race for the roses. If Texas plays in the Rose Bowl Game, I’ll be extremely disappointed. I want them in the game that awards the AFCA National Championship Trophy.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 28, 2009 2:19 PM CDT reply actions
duh
race to the roses is very obviously referring to the NC game in Pasadena at the Rose Bowl
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
The venue is still called The Rose Bowl
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 28, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
But the race for the roses is a term typically associated with the Rose Bowl Game, not the stadium itself.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 28, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions
How do you know?
Have they ever been separated before? Maybe people were associating it with the stadium and you just thought they were associating it with the game because they were always the same.
Yes, because the term is never used when talking about UCLA home games.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 28, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry...
…but the name is staying. The game we want to play in is in the Rose Bowl. This post is about the race to get there. It works.
Feel the love.
You ain't hurt.
I certainly didn’t expect a name change, but rather wanted to point out that a lot of people around here have been saying things about the Rose Bowl (game), not the Rose Bowl (stadium). I have no interest in seeing UT in another Rose Bowl Game.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 28, 2009 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Good stuff AW
Agree that VT must stay in the discussion for now, if only for their high profile start, continued presence high in the rankings, and relative beauty of their wart (loss to Bama).
You ain't hurt.
Schlabach, is that you?
AW, great post, MS for ESPN did the exact same one today , lol
"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"
by greenspointexas on Sep 28, 2009 3:12 PM CDT reply actions
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/notebook?page=notebook/onthemark094
"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"
by greenspointexas on Sep 28, 2009 3:13 PM CDT reply actions
Cincy
I know I mentioned this last week as well, but I think CIncy probably needs to be officially on the list.
Remember in 2007 (a season which this season, correctly or not, is most being compared to) that (1) one Big East team (USF) jumped up to #2 during the middle of the season and (2) another (WVU) was set to emerge, even with one loss, as a championship game participant until it blew its last game.
Is the reluctance to include driven Cincinnati driven more by (1) the Big East is even weaker than it was two years ago (although still viewed as the weakest BCS conference in 2007), so it’s not quite apples-to-apples comparison to point out how well USF and WVU were faring that year, or (2) the reason I suspect, this is “Cincinnati,” a perennial doormat and about as non-sexy a BSC team as there is. In other words, perhaps if this same group of players were wearing jerseys that said “West Virginia” or “Syracuse” and had the chance to pull off the exact same season, they’d have more of a chance to break into the championship game given their better histories?
Formerly kjm017
I think the difference that year was the West Virginia was supposed to be good
So that lent credibility to the conference. No one in the Big East was supposed to be good this year.

by 





























