In the Trenches - Digesting the Cupcake Feast
Another superb bit of analysis on Texas' line play from burnt in ny. --PB--
It's like Thanksgiving afternoon on the UT blogs today, as fans sit satiated with great plays and haul in their bloated bellies from a 64-7 smacking of UTEP. I'm digesting the last icing on the final cupcake of the afternoon for the Horns, thinking on what we learned about play in the lines this week.

The human metaphor for the Longhorn fanbase at the moment
Yes, there were astounding plays by Kindle, Houston, Sam Acho and Ben Alexander on defense. Yes, the Horns rushed for more than 300 yards for the first time in a coon's age, and yes Colt was smiling on the bench for the first time this season. But hey, this was UTEP, a team that largely gave up after Colt McCoy's 16-yard touchdown pass to Jordan Shipley's back shoulder made it 33-7 with 7:08 left in the second quarter. You always have to wonder about how much you learn from a game like this, so let's go to class after the jump.
First, let's consider the Big Points following the namesake of this weekly piece.
Loaders and Backhoes
Recognition and the Texas running game
The Horns handed the ball to a running back only 7 times in the first half, so all the griping from fans and analysts about the first half rushing stats (and Tre Newton now NOT being the answer) are a bit hysterical. One run went only 3 yards because it was a touchdown (standing up I might add). Two runs gained negative yardage, and I'll get into these in a moment, while the other runs gained 4, 7, 7 and 3 yards, respectively. Points of excellence were excellent seal blocks to the outside by Ulatoski and Hix on the DE or LB (depending on how the defensive formation was shifted. The negative plays were a microcosm of the problems in the Texas running game and illustrated quite clearly: THE PROBLEM WITH THE TEXAS RUNNING GAME HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH THE RUNNING BACKS. The problems have been, and continue to be, inconsistent play by the guards.
So what do they have to do with? Recognition and technique by the interior OL. The first negative running play (-3 yards) was a zone read to the right from the UTEP 6, when tackle Kyle Hix kicked out the LB as planned, but RG Michael Huey, in his shift to the right, failed to react to an interior twist by the UTEP DE and allowed his man to penetrate into the backfield. This forced Newton to shade backwards, running him into Hix and allowing the DE to make the ankle tackle on Newton. Had Huey made his block, Newton might have scored on that play. The one-yard loss occurred later from the UTEP 45 on the same type running play. This time Chris Hall attacked the middle LB successfully and Huey and Hix sealed off the right side, with Huey successfully leaving his man to block the outside LB that was attacking the middle. However, Charlie Tanner reacted very slowly to in inside slant by the DT and allowed him to slide right into the otherwise gaping hole, stopping Newton for a loss.
Numerous other recognition problems plagued other plays. For example, John Chiles ran a WildHorn counter play later in the third quarter and might have gone for 10-15 yards, except Charlie Tanner, who was pulling from left to right, didn't see the UTEP safety attacking from his left and instead went after another safety 7 yards further down the field, leaving the first safety untouched to make the tackle for only a 3-yard gain.
It's not clear how many of these little problems are fixable, since they seem to result from Tanner and Huey not seeing the field as well as they need to, or just getting out-quicked by smaller linemen.. At any rate, the OL remains, to quote Mack Brown, "a work in progress."
Hell Hath No Fury...Except When the Smarter Play Is...
Many commentators are lauding the defense as being the best at Texas in a long time. The tendency is to think of it as a ferocious unit that takes on Will Muschamp's personality, with Sergio Kindle, the Achos, Lamarr Houston, and Muckelroy laying the wood. The team has 12 sacks in its last 3 games, a pace that if continued would smash last year's nation-leading 47. It is clear, however, after 4 games, that the Horns are as much a smart team as they are a ferocious one. It was fun to watch Houston, Ben Alexander, and Muckelroy make initial rushes and then peel off early when they read a screen pass. Come to think of it, none of the last three opponents has really run a successful screen against the Horns. This contrasts sharply with last year, when OU, Oklahoma State, and Texas Tech ran screens with impunity.
Picks and Shovels
Some of the finer points of mention In the Trenches
1. It was amazing to see DT Ben Alexander on a zone blitz in the third quarter, 10 yards deep in the zone, come within a foot of breaking up a pass. That's what you call OPTIONS. It's great to know that Alexander is more than just a potentially immovable object.
2. One thing I was interested in was how Dan Buckner was helping or hurting the Texas running game. This was a difficult evaluation, given the opponent and the small number of times Texas ran the ball when it wasn't garbage time. But a few things pop out. One, Texas rarely uses Buckner as anything other than a downfield blocker from his flex TE position. Without a true TE, I think this puts enormous pressure on the five offensive linemen to make their blocks, as there are fewer of the double-teaming options along the line that are critical to making the zone-blocking scheme of the Longhorns work. Look for more boom and bust in the running game in that regard, as Texas' downfield blocking with Buckner, Williams, Chiles, and Shipley is outstanding and leaves gaping areas if the backs can get into the secondary, but occasionally a defender will make deep disruptive penetration.
3. Adam Ulatoski is known as a good pass blocker with liabilities as a run blocker. In the last two games, big number 74 has done much better at run-blocking than pass-blocking. He's given up, by my count, 4 QB hurries against Colt, and seems to be struggling against inside moves. In the run game, he's been a monster on those counter plays when he pulls from left to right, and he has been strong at sealing the DE inside and the LB outside on zone reads and sweeps.
Adam Ulatoski staring down a LB on a sweep.
4. Texas' offensive line depth, while not overwhelming, is better than many think. Trey Allen was in for a lot snaps, even early in the game and played well, often absolutely smothering his man, but keeping his head up to look for delayed blitzers. David Snow came in for Chris Hall after Hall dinged a shoulder and played well, as he pass-protected well and shows excellent speed in getting upfield to block safteties and LB's. Britt Mitchell also played well at RT early in the thrid quarter. He looked a bit overmatched at times, but there was no ole' in his two-step against the pass rush. But before we get too excited, I was underwhelmed by the play of Luke Poehlman, the Horns' first runner up at LT. He had problems recognizing blitzes and was getting beaten routinely on inside moves.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
25 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the jury is in on our DT situation
And the result is that we’re better off than we thought we would be. It was our biggest question on defense at the beginning of the season and what we’re seeing is really instilling some confidence in me.
It’s a pleasure to watch Randall, Houston, and even Alexander rampage around the field making plays. I haven’t even seen them slip up once, though my eye isn’t the most trained. I DO notice them in the backfield, and on any given play they have a shot to be back there causing commotion. I love it.
No one has run against us with any success, and I feel good going into the RRS game with these guys.
Nice post
Kudos to Adam who was awarded the Offensive Boss Hawg award Saturday. Agree that he is starting to fill those size 17’s nicely.
It seems to me our OL has had problems with smaller defensive players. I noticed they had a tough time blocking down on the Wyoming lineman. They often appear to have foot movement problems. But they rebounded and performed very nicely, IMO, against Tech. I think we will see increasingly better OL production as we creep into “eye level” competition.
"We don't freestyle Texas Fight, big boy." - Coach Brown
I've actually wondered this same thing
Since we’re not relying on bulldozing teams over, are we relying on coordination and speed? In that case, maybe we’ll have sub-par performances against these teams whose lines are inferior?
Maybe it’s just my optimism coming through, but we might see our best games ( for the O-Line ) against the larger lines we face.
I don’t know how that translates to the Tech game, or how big their line was.
Tech's line is middle of the road in size
Most of the DT’s go 275-280 except for Colby Whitlock, who is around 290, and the ends are 240-280. Possibly these guys are quick enough to give the line problems. But I still maintain a big part of it is recognition of things like delayed blitzes, twists, and stunts. From kriess preview of Tech
LUBBOCK LINE-UP:
—RE: Daniel Howard. 6-3, 244 lbs SR.
—Ryan Halliburton, 6-4 270 lbs FR
—DT: Colby Whitlock. 6-3, 280 lbs JR.
—DT: Richard Jones: 6-2 285 lbs JR.
by burnt in ny on Sep 28, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
OU's Line
For comparison:
DE Jeremy Beal Jr. 6-3 261
NG Adrian Taylor Jr. 6-4 291
DT Gerald McCoy Jr. 6-4 297
DE Auston English Sr. 6-3 251
Every backup is heavier than the starter, except for Beal, who listed as the biggest as his DE spot.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Sep 28, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions
The issue in the OU game
will be disguised blitzes around Tanner after OU’s front ties up everybody and Hall has to double on McCoy. Can Huey handle either Taylor or McCoy long enough for the running back to help on the outside rush and for Hall to help guard against the interiror blitz or help Tanner. Reynolds (OU LB) is very smart and will know how to hide his blitz. It remains to be seen how quick Taylor and English are relative to Huey/Tanner and Hix.
I'll still take that matchup rather than having
Our front 7 on their line. If their line hasn’t remarkably improved since the BYU fiasco, whoever OU has in at quarterback is going to be scrubbing the turf with his ass after tossing a pick into the air.
We’ll see how they do against Miami
Rollout and quick passes
should help negate the OU pass rush. When you throw the ball immediately, it is next to impossible to get to the QB in time. Colt is quite mobile and throws well on the run, even running to his left. The OU game is a good game to rollout a bunch so that OU has a hard time predicting where he will be when he throws the ball.
The short passes worked great against OU last year, here’s hoping that UT sticks to the same strategy this season.
Good write up
Careful, there is a group of fans who are scouring the internet trying to stamp out any sign of an “objective” comment on our OL or our running game.
PS, while not an OL issue, Tre Newton’s pass blocking was stellar in this game.
One thing is for sure...
The UTEP game help balance out the passing defense from the Tech game the week before.
Great stuff
The more of this line oriented commentary (especially the technical details), the better. It would be great if you could point to online clips that show the plays you are discussing. Mack always has highlights of each game on his website but, of course, it does not contain many clips of OL missing their blocks.
Could you discuss a little about the horns’ blocking schemes for various plays and compare/contrast their effectiveness (and why)? It seems like counter is a really good running play for the horns,my guess is because it helps set up the blocks for OL but it would be interesting to hear your opinion.
illustrations with video and online graphics are on my agenda
But as for most readers of BON, I get limited windows of time for writing posts, and it sometimes is a challenge for me to watch the games once through on tape, much less extract stills or clips. But I’ll work on it because I’ve seen how it’s improved fan understanding on the site.
The Horns blocking schemes are based on zone blocking. Here’s a good video-based discussion of the Denver zone blocking scheme, on which the Texas scheme is based. As you watch, focus on how the linemen try to double-team and then switch off to block a second defender. I think I will work up a full-blown post on this for next week, since there will be no game to decompose.
If you remember the plays you can use the ESPN play by play to find the general time on the game clock when it happened.
I don’t know if that would help at all.
Excellent presentation by Billick
Coach Billick stressed that 3 things make the Denver zone blocking/running scheme successful:
1. Huge number of reps in practice
2. TBs that are taught how to do zone running and actually do it (or they don’t play)
3. Hard core commitment by the head coach to the running game as the core of the offense
None of these points are completely true for the horns, right? For example, Vondrell did not seem to understand zone running his first 2 years in the program. My guess is that most reps in practice go to the passing game because the horns are a pass first team (i.e. not very committed to the run).
The most important thing that I have learned from your post is that the blocking scheme of the horns is pretty complex. Each lineman has to recognize the situation in realtime to do his job and that he may have to block two different defenders on the same play. It is not trivial to know the right thing to do, let alone do it.
My son claims that zone blocking is too complex for college teams because they don’t have the time to legally practice enough reps to get it right. What do you think?
Could you also discuss the role of the QB in specifying what blocking approach to take on a particular play?
If coach Billick is right about the 3 points enumerated above, why should the horns expect to be successful in their zone running/blocking scheme?
Maybe using existing instructional videos on the web (if they exist) might make it easier to present your points. Anyway, great stuff!
Downfield blocking
How would you rank the blocking of Ship, Kirk, Chiles, Malcolm, Dan with 1 being the highest ranking and 5 being the lowest ranking? I think Malcolm is probably the best blocker and some say Chiles is a pretty good blocker. given that we excellent downfield blocking, why don’t the dump passes to TBs generate more yards? Who is the quickest guard, Tray Allen?
Do you think Malcolm could handle the blocking duties if he were an H back? How about Chiles or Buckner?
wide receiver blocking may be the best in the country
Williams and Chiles are extremely physical, but even Jordan Shipley has blocked well. It was a Shipley block that sprung Tre Newton for a touchdown against Tech. Williams blocks helped Chiles score two touchdowns this year off bubble screens. As a further testament, when is the last time anyone complained about a bubble screen? The Horns are executing these much better because the receivers are blocking so well.
I haven’t watched a lot of other games, but the only competition I see for wide receiver blocking is at Michigan. Florida’s offense isn’t quite what it was partly because their starting WR’s are injured and they aren’t ripping off as many big runs as last year.
None of Texas’ big wide receivers would likely flourish as an H-back because H-backs have to be able to make blocks in the interior holes on linebackers (or even linemen) who are bigger than them with very little room to accelerate. Ithink all three are capable of blocking effectively in the open field, but they are just too long-legged and gangly to be effective H-backs.
The one likely effective H-back on the roster, Barrett Matthews doesn’t seem likely to play much this year, but could become a significant weapon next year.
This is the best blocking I've seen our WR's do
It actually makes me think those quick little WR screen passes are going to work when we use them.
Bobby Kennedy has the Midas touch this season
Seems like everything Bobby Kennedy is involved with is doing great. He is bringing along several new WRs: Chiles, Goodwin, Fozzy (new as a WR), Buckner, Malcolm. Kirk has really improved. Malcolm is probably the only WR who has not progressed as expected (and he is doing a great job blocking and on special teams and is improving as a WR).
Bobby is in return of the kick return team and they are doing great (2 TD returns already this season!).
Last, but not least, the WRs are doing a good job not just catching the ball but also in blocking. Screens are working better than ever.
Big WRs facilitate effective WR blocking
The horns have more big WRs playing this year in Malcolm, Buckner, and Chiles. This really helps the WR blocking. A huge factor in the effectiveness of the WR screens this year is the blocking by the guards who are motoring out to the outside and delivering timely blocks on DBs to initially spring the WR running with the ball.
Also, the WR patterns have been constructed such that a WR (not the intended receiver on that play) is often in position to block for the WR who just caught a pass. This is a very big deal.
I can’t figure out why our dump passes to TBs are not working that great. could it be lack of coordination between the WRs and TBs?
I agree about the guards getting out to block
AS an example, Trey Allen absolutely annihilated the Wyoming corner on Chiles’ bubble screen catch and run for a touchdown in that game.
TB dump-offs
I don’t know for sure, but I think that the timing between the QB and the RB is the problem. On most plays, the back checks for blitzes or free rushing linemen to chip before he goes out. It may be that, with McGee’s checkered pass-blocking past and Newton’s relative inexperience, both are staying in the backfield a little longer than necessary, which means that they are not all the way into their pattern when Colt is ready to throw.
Another reason may be Colt’s tendency to lock in on Shipley and hold the ball until Shipley gets open. Colt often waits too long to check down to the back, resulting sometimes in a hurried, off-balance, inaccurate throw.
A final reason is that teams still seem to have a “spy” linebacker to guard against Colt running the ball, and several times this player has been in position to make a quick tackle on the dump-off pass.
Great article
Need to get you on the front page.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I think it has been...
..PB’s bumped ‘em each time, that’s why I rec. them so they don’t get lost quickly.
by vy til i die on Sep 30, 2009 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions

by 

































