Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

"Informal" TBR: Sizing Up the Two Unbeatens

 

It’s good to be the king.

For those that follow my commenting, you’ll know that in addition to being a Texas alum, I’m a diehard Kentucky supporter. So damn, it’s nice to see my two teams on top of the world. Now that I’ve gotten over my weeklong depression from the events of January 7 (coupled with PB’s inability to churn out posts at his normal rate), I thought it would be a nice time to compare and contrast the two remaining D-1 unbeatens (Venn diagrams sold separately). Thus, I present my informal Texas Basketball Report.

Star-divide

First, a rundown of the major players and who I’d pick if I could.

The returning superstars: Damion James vs. Patrick Patterson

On its face, the two players couldn’t have started their careers any differently. Patrick Patterson was long recruited by Tubby Smith, and picked Kentucky because of (in spite of?) Billy Gillispie’s last minute persuading. Damion James committed to Texas only after the Ralph Kelvin Sampson scandal broke at OU. Patterson long dreamed of getting his college degree; Damion thought he’d be one and done. Their first few seasons couldn’t have gone more differently. While James assisted future lottery picks Kevin Durant and DJ Augustin to numerous post-season games, Patterson’s best teammate has been Jodie Meeks, a second round draft pick. Patterson has also never played in the NCAA tournament.

This season has thus far been lights out for both. James, finally comfortable with being the first option, is humming along at the double-double rate of 17/11. Patterson, finally able to be a Tonto rather than a Lone Ranger, has a very efficient 16/8 (63% from the field).

At the beginning of the season, I would have taken Patterson, no question. And while he’s improved his game (see his development with the 3 point shot and baseline J), James is in a whole ‘nother stratosphere. Give me JAMES on this one.

The diaper dandies: Avery Bradley vs. John Wall

The running theme throughout the year has been that John Wall is the consensus POY, while Bradley has struggled to live up to his ESPN #1 ranking. No more. Bradley has very quietly upped his scoring while shooting lights out. Wall, meanwhile, has come back down to Earth (if only slightly—he’s still rather otherworldly). Still, Wall’s 17 PPG and 7 APG rank third and first in the SEC. I made the comment over at BC that "Bradley is fundamentally sound on offensive spacing, beautiful J, and tenacious D. John Wall is visually spectacular and makes about 5 "did you see that?!?" plays per game; he also makes about 5 boneheaded plays per game. Bradley seems to do neither–he’s just consistently solid." I’ll stick with that statement. Still, if you’re asking me to pick a player for the win, I’m going in guns blazing with WALL, no ifs, ands, or buts.

The BIG man: Dexter Pittman vs. DeMarcus Cousins

Pittman’s taken four years to get to where Cousins is right now. They’re both big, strong, agile, and dunk the ball pretty spectacularly. While Dex is often perceived as the gentle giant, Cousins gets labeled as immature with an attitude problem. Stats don’t lie, though. In 20 mpg, Pittman is averaging a 13/7 (72% from the field, though!). Cousins, likewise, is at 20 mpg, but pours in 15/9. Cousins has grown increasingly confident as the season progresses, and he’ll be scary good come tournament time. I love me some Sexy Dexy, but I’ll bet COUSINS runs circles around Dex.

Light ‘em up: J’Covan Brown/Jai Lucas vs. Eric Bledsoe

I’m throwing J’Covan and Jai to form a super-hybrid here: the scoring creator that Barnes missed badly last year. Both stretch the floor and provide adequate ball-handling. J’Covan’s biggest plus is his ace FT%, sitting at 95%, although his recent rash of TO’s don’t help (1:1.3 AST:TO). Lucas is, well, small. J’Covan gets the pub for his long range but is currently sitting at 29%, while Lucas (small sample size) sits at 60%. Eric Bledsoe’s numbers are solid at 11/3/3, but he’s been capable of taking over a game (see: Florida). Can we count on Brown or Lucas to do that? Haven't seen it yet. So for now, BLEDSOE.

The enigma: Jordan Hamilton vs. Darius Miller

Miller was hyped up all off-season as being the perfect swingman for Calipari’s DDMO; in fact, he was supposed to gain a world of confidence for his play on Team USA. In Texas’ recruiting class, Bradley had the fundamentals, but Hamilton had the all-world talent. Both have thus far disappointed to date: Hamilton from over-confidence, Miller from a lack of confidence, and both for poor defense. Both have been shaky shooting (Hamilton at 40% and 37% from 3, Miller at 43% from both), but HAMILTON’s superior rebounding + passing skills but his otherworldly potential make selecting him a no-brainer.

The defensive stopper: Justin Mason vs. Ramon Harris

Just wanted to give a quick plug to these two players. Both came in lightly recruited: Mason was the ffourth best player on a star-studded class; Ramon Harris joined the team in mid-season from Alaska, of all places. Yet both have done an amazing job of being team players and providing hustle plays when needed. Being a homer, I’ll take MASON.

The X-factor: Doge Balbay vs. Darnell Dodson

I didn’t really have a good place to stick these two, so let’s just call them the X-factors. PB loves the Doge, as do I. In a Kentucky vs. Texas matchup, I see Rick having Balbay stick to Wall like glue. His 2.8:1 AST:TO ratio and All-NBA D are stellar, but his utter inability to shoot is not. Dodson, meanwhile, has a silky smooth shot. He’s far bigger than any of Texas’ guards, and trying to stick Damion or Hamilton on him would be just unfair. Still, there’s a reason Doge is a starter (and a reason why PB gives him serious guy love. BALBAY all the way.

Quality depth: Gary Johnson/Alexi Wangmene/Matt Hill vs. Daniel Orton/Perry Stevenson/DeAndre Liggins

Including Johnson on this list is probably unfair; he may be Texas’ fourth or fifth best player. His inclusion alone points me to TEXAS.

 

As you can see, the two teams match up well. Let’s run through some stats:

Adjusted Ken Pom Efficiency Stats:

Tempo/Pace. Texas 76.5 (5) / Kentucky 70.7 (71)

Offensive Efficiency. Texas 116.1 (14) / Kentucky 117.2 (10)

Defensive Efficiency. Texas 84.5 (5) / Kentucky 90.6 (37)

Raw Four Factors (Offense):

Effective FG%. Texas 55.0 (15) / Kentucky 55.2 (14)

TO%. Texas 18.5 (59) / Kentucky 21.0 (173)

Off Rebounding%. Texas 40.3 (15) / Kentucky 38.3 (32)

FTA/FGA. Texas 42.4 (69) / Kentucky 40.3 (102)

Raw Four Factors (Defense):

Effective FG%. Texas 41.3 (5) / Kentucky 44.7 (48)

TO%. Texas 22.8 (78) / Kentucky 21.0 (161)

Off Rebounding%. Texas 29.3 (48) / Kentucky 30.7 (89)

FTA/FGA. Texas 30.9 (52) / Kentucky 27.1 (16)

 

I know, it’s a pipe dream right now, but I thought I’d do it anyway.

How Texas can Stop Kentucky

1. Stop John Wall. Simple, right? Texas can do this better than most. Barnes will more than likely start with Balbay, but even behind him, Barnes can use Mason and, dare I dream it, Bradley. Stopping Wall is a pipe dream anyway; what I really mean is contain Wall. As in, Kentucky has a problem with turnovers. Limit Wall’s penetration and turn him into a jump shooter, and, whenever possible, make Bledsoe the primary ballhandler.

2. Pound the glass. Kentucky has some skilled big men up front, but so does Texas. Look at those offensive rebounding percentages. We’ve seen Texas bludgeon teams on the glass, and there’s no reason why they can’t do it against Kentucky. Patterson, as big as he is, likes to play in the mid-range. Cousins is talented but raw. The guards like to run. Use the offensive boards to your advantage.

3. Slow the tempo. I know, this is counter-intuitive from the numbers, and even from performance. It’s just a gut feeling. Texas loves to run and hates the half court sets. But John Wall goes up and down the court faster than humanly possible. He’ll take a running game any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

How Kentucky can Stop Texas

1. Sag and zone. If Barnes is going to keep stubbornly playing Doge and Mason (which he might have to going up against Wall and Bledsoe), you’ll see a lot of inside help to preserve Cousins’ and Patterson’s fouls. See: Iowa State. If Texas counters with Brown or Lucas, Wall may have a field day. That’s a positive in Kentucky’s favor.

2. Make it a 3 point game. Force Texas to shoot three’s, and they’re a lot less efficient. Kentucky shoots 39% from long distance; Texas shoots 35%. Plus, long shots mean long rebounds, and we already covered how good Wall is coast to coast.

3. Depth to foul. Free throw shooting (like Kentucky’s turnovers) is Texas’ Achilles heel. Available bodies (like Texas’ depth) is one of Kentucky’s strengths. Take advantage and send Texas to the line. Besides Brown, Texas has no ball-handlers it trusts to shoot free throws. So play smothering on-ball defense, prevent the easy entry to Dex, and don’t be afraid to get some hands in there.

These are two of the best teams (if not the two best teams) in the nation. While it’s early yet, I would love to see these two go head-to-head. And yes, I realize I just jinxed both into getting their first losses. Whatever, it builds character.

All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let's see this matchup live

Onward: to the Final Four!

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Jan 16, 2010 8:33 AM CST reply actions  

Outstanding stuff

Thanks jc. I actually wrote John Gasaway a couple nights ago, urgin him to root for Bradley v Wall in the NCAA Finals, which would be a truly fantastic match up. As we all know, Bradley got his #1 ranking with ESPN in large part because of his defense and because he was the first player to make John Wall look bad. To date, the only player.

Kentucky is also one of the few teams that can match Texas in terms of “room left to get ridiculous.” The Cats oftentimes fall asleep on defense, a reflection of their youth as much as anything. Offensively, the thing you have to love if you’re a UK fan is four legitimate shooting threats from beyond the arc (Bledsoe, Wall, Miller, Dodson), which even if they didn’t have Wall as a penetrator would be huge for Cousins and Patterson on the inside. Of course, they do have Wall. They are good at basketball.

Shaping up to be a great season. Hope the Horns show up to play tonight.

Alabama 37 Texas 21

by Peter Bean on Jan 16, 2010 9:57 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks

On Wall vs. Bradley, I don’t think Barnes would actually put Bradley on Wall for fear of foul trouble. Unless, of course, Balbay and Mason get absolutely destroyed by Wall. Likewise, I think Calipari starts with Bledsoe on Bradley. Bledsoe, while smaller, is actually a better on-ball defender than Wall is, as Wall often looks uninterested on the defensive end.

I tend to agree with your second point, in that Kansas is what it is (which is still freakin’ good), as are teams like Mich. St, Duke, and Purdue. Texas and Kentucky are two elite teams who can still “play up” to their talent, which makes the fact that they’re the remaining two unbeatens pretty remarkable.

by jc25 on Jan 16, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice. And question...

What is your thought on “playing up, or down, to the competition”? While I have only seen the Wildcats play once this year, I would offer that Texas’ YTD performance is more suspect based on level of competition than KY. That’s what concerns me as we get closer to post-season play.

by TXStampede on Jan 16, 2010 10:43 AM CST reply actions  

Playing up/down

Kentucky has much more up/down swivel within games than Texas does. Witness the UNC game, where Kentucky jumped ahead by 20, lost Wall for the beginning of the second half, and then ended up winning by 2. This has been a trend in other games as well (see: Louisville, Kentucky). Living in Texas, I don’t see much of their cupcake games, but it seems like it’s similar to when Texas played A&M-CC. Obviously more talent, but a little disinterest, which leads to closer than expected games.

Meanwhile, Texas pretty much bludgeons you to death, slowly chipping away until the end of the second half, when the depth and tenaciousness really start to wear down the opponent.

Bottom line, if it’s tied at the half, I’ll take Texas. If it’s tied with 5 minutes to go, I’ll take Kentucky.

by jc25 on Jan 16, 2010 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I hope we don't see them in the tourney.

I think we can beat them, but my whole family went to Kentucky (including my parents and grand parents). If we won I’m not sure they would speak to me, if we lost I’m not sure I would speak to them.

I have seen quite a bit of both teams, Kentucky plays “younger” than Texas (KY, more highs and lows-Texas more of a consistent even keel). Early in the season I thought Texas was thinking too much, which with all of the new players was understandable, they would have that 1/2 second pause where they missed an open man on a cut, or did not cover for one another on defense. Kentucky seemed at times to not be thinking at all, playing too fast, being one step ahead of themselves (J’Covan does this a lot).

by billb on Jan 16, 2010 12:18 PM CST reply actions  

Playing too fast

Totally agree on this one: that’s what happens when you put freshmen in as your primary ballhandlers. Texas has experience with Doge at the point and James and Pittman inside to slow down its game, whereas Kentucky is perpetually at a million miles an hour because almost all of its core are newbies.

by jc25 on Jan 16, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice comparisons

the player comparisons and Pomeroy rankings suggest Texas has the edge for now. I think not having Varez Ward is huge from a defensive standpoint against UK.

by goingforthecorner on Jan 16, 2010 12:47 PM CST reply actions  

Great stuff

Even a non-basketball guy can understand and enjoy this!

You do mean Kelvin Sampson in the James section, right?

by edsp on Jan 16, 2010 1:20 PM CST reply actions  

Pittman vs Cousins

one key stat that I feel gives Pittman the edge is FG%. Pittman shooting a ridiculous 72.5% from the field (1.78 points per shot). Cousins shooting 53.3% (1.44 pps).

by goingforthecorner on Jan 16, 2010 3:46 PM CST reply actions  

Naturally

After I write this, both teams encounter close calls but pull away with identical 72-67 victories.

Again, it’s good to be king.

by jc25 on Jan 17, 2010 5:05 PM CST reply actions  

Nice job

Fun hypothetical comparison that may come to fruition soon. Thanks for this.

by Infield Elephant on Jan 18, 2010 4:25 PM CST reply actions  

Kind of in the same boat as you jc

I was born in Austin and lived most of my life in the Austin area so I am loving the Horns being on top but I am a junior at Kentucky right now and also loving the Cats being close behind.

Being in Kentucky, I’ve only seen a couple of halves Texas has played. This teams has a lot of heart and will come out swinging. I am really happy where Texas is right now.

Of course also being a student at UK, I’ve been to practically every home game and have seen most of the road games and holy crap, if we can ever stay focused and play a complete game I will be amazed. But this has everything to do with the inexperience of the team (UK starts with 3 freshman, 1 sophomore and 1 Junior).

I agree on your statement stating that both, Texas and Kentucky, are no where near as good as they could be. As of right now, I can see Texas being able to pull a win over Kentucky if they were to meet. Later on in the year, that could very well change or it could remain the same. Either way it’s going to be a good year for both teams. I hope they meet in the finals, but then again I don’t because I’m going to be getting a lot of crap up here if they do.

by otherss on Jan 18, 2010 11:15 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn