Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

They were who we thought they were

I've seen lot of fans posting about Saban's classlessness, the ref's onesided calls, the trolls and idiots who've come on this site to gloat and be trolls and idiots.  What I haven't seen is a lot of people writing about our team.  What did we do in this game?  After the jump I'll share my breakdown of position.

Star-divide

Texas Longhorn Grades - 2009 National Championship Game

Coaching: B+   I have to give the coaches credit for making the adjustments neccessary to keep us in the game.  Many talking heads want to say the shovel pass to end the half was a bone head call.  It obviously went about as bad as it could've, but hindsight is always 20/20.  What if the play goes for 15 yard and we get a chance to chuck it to the endzone?  You never know what might've happened.  If the pass falls incompete, no harm done.  Our coaches have been aggressive all year.  That's what I want from my coaches, to push, to be the aggressor, to not back down.  Many fans were probably upset with the extremely conservative play calling by Greg Davis throughout the second quarter.  I actually think Greg Davis called a really good game.  He probably lost 60% of his playbook when McCoy went down and yet there were several perfect play calls that the offense didn't execute for scores.  Will Muschamp and D were never really able to contain the 'Bama rush game, but you could see in the 3rd quarter that half-time adjustments were made, and Alabama struggled to move the ball the entire second half.  All in all the only place I think the coaches could've done better was to help the team survive the shell-shock of losing McCoy a little better.  The injury clearly shook the entire team.  Our coaches have been solid to great throughout the entire '09 season and in the end, they were who we thought they were.

Quarterbacks: C-   Garrett Gilbert's performance unto itself is worthy of a lower grade then a C-, but in context, you might have to give him a higher grade.  The kid showed incredible resiliency.  He was consistently hit hard after releasing passes and we threw the two early picks, but that didn't keep him down.  Colt looked great while he was in the game.  I know it's a small sample size, but he did complete both of his passes.  The same 'ole accurate Colt.  Greg Davis did a really good job of protecting Gilbert until he was able to find some plays that were able to pick up positive yardage.  As the game wore on and the playcalling opened up.  But alas, we saw the results of aggressive play calling with a freshman quarterback: turnovers.  It really goes without saying that the biggest difference in the game were the 5 turnovers.  Unfortunately for the young freshman QB, he had a hand in all of them.  On the other hand, I couldn't be prouder of how he shrugged off the early struggles and led this offense back in the second half.  We couldn't have asked for more from a greatly heralded true freshman quarterback playing on the biggest stage in College Football.  I think he's going to be who we think he is.

Running backs: C-   Just as anyone could've predicted we struggled to run the football against the vaunted Crimson Tide defense.  I don't think there were any sane fans who thought we were going to be able to control the game with our run game.  Texas rushed for 81 yards on 28 carries for a net gain of 2.8 yards per carry.  I give the running backs a bit of a curve with a C- because Alabama was clearly loading up to stone the run once Gilbert came in.  Early in the game Cody Johnson was able to convert on 3rd and short, something he's been able to do pretty consistantly all year.  Newton did a good job of not dancing around the backfield and taking the positive, albeit not large, gains that were there.  The jet sweeps worked really well in the first half before Alabama was able to make adjustments for the second half.  The slip screens to Marquise Goodwin also worked essentially like outside running plays and 'Bama never did figure that play out.  Side note:  I don't think I've ever seen our WR screen game look as good as it did in this game agaist a really good defense.  Go figure.  In the end, our o-line was unable to open holes and/or maintain them long enough to get the consitent 4 yard runs we were looking for.  It was about what we've seen from this group all year.  They were who we thought they were.

Offensive Line: C   This group had been told for a solid month how aweful they were.  They responded pretty well.  Pass protection on the whole was good, not great, but good.  Run blocking wasn't great, but then again, when has it been in 2009?  This group has been prone to mental lapses now and again, and that was their undoing in this one.  The unblocked blitzer off the quaterback's blind side sealed the deal for Alabama.  A solid if not flawed unit that was who we thought they were.

Wide Receivers: D  Do teachers put minuses on D's?  If they do, you can insert that little hyphen after the D.  Let's go man by man shall we?  We shall.  Jordan Shipley: the reason this group doesn't get an F for total failure.  On his own he gets an A for doing what he's done all year, which is obliterate single coverage.  He's too quick for college DB's.  He can't be covered mano y mano, just can't be done.  Jordan Shipley is a gamer and he was who we thought he was.  Alas, he did drop a crucial pass in the game as well.  Which leads to the other names.  Malcolm Williams:  aka hands of stone.  Malcolm has been an enigma all season.  It seemed as if he'd put his early season/career drop problems behind him in the last few games.  Instead we saw bad Malcolm with I believe 3 important drops (one for a TD).  The announcers said it would've been a tought catch.  It wasn't an easy catch, but had he brought that one down for the TD, it wouldn't have been labled as a miracle or a circus catch, just a solid grab.  He's had problems with drops in the past, he had problems when the heat was turned up.  Malcolm Williams was who we thought he was.  Marquise Goodwin:  did some really nice things turning the short passes into long gains.  His future is still bright.  He is still who we thought he was.  Dan Buckner: makes circus catches, drops balls that hit him in the chest.  Had he been able to make that third down catch early in the game, who knows what that does for Gilber's confidence.  John Chiles/James Kirkendol: aka 'The Invisible Men.'  We've seen glints of brilliance from both John and James this season, but on they whole, they've been two receivers defined by lacksidasicle effort, mopey attitudes, dropped passes, with a sprinkling of nice plays.  This game was no different.  No catches for no yards.  At least they didn't drop any passes.  They were who we thought they were.

Defensive Line:  A-   The defensive line play was solid.  They were able to put an amazing amount of pressure on McElroy when he dropped back to pass (partly because of great secondary coverage).  Without going back and looking at the tape again, I'd have to say they held their gaps reasonably well against Alabama's offensive line.  Most of the successful runs were successful because of a DB's inablility to turn the play back inside, or a Safety/LB's inability to make a tackle in the hole.  A solid showing from a great group.  The nation got see a taste of the penetration ablility of Lamaar Houston, and they also got to the athlete that is Sergio Kindle.  They've been rock solid all year.  They were who we thought they were.

Linebackers:  B-  This group had a mixed review.  In some spots they filled holes and made tough, hard-nosed tackles.  Muckelroy, one of the leaders of the defense, kept everyone up while the offense was trying to find their way.  They were solid in pass coverage as Greg McElroy rarely had anyone to throw to.  In other spots they were seen bouncing off of Mark Ingram as he picked up his pattented YAC yards.  In the Texas linebackers you have a group of no name guys who've done everything the coaches have asked them to do.  They were who we thought they were.

Defensive backs:  B-  Again, another mixed bag.  Run support was not good.  Chykie Brown had several Deion Sanders esque tackling attempts.  Richardson was able to break off his long TD run because Blake Gideon failed to fill the correct hole.  They just weren't quite physical enough in bringing down the Alabama running backs.  However, coverage was stellar all night long.  You can't say enough positive things about how good this group did when McElroy tried to pass the ball.  They were a lock down group for the majority of the season and 'Bama got a good taste of what they can do.  They were who we thought they were.

In the end, I can't be too heavy hearted about this defeat.  We lost our best player.  We turned the ball over 5 times and eventually lost the game.  But!...  Our players came to win the game.  They didn't quit.  They didn't lose heart.  They got punched in the mouth, and you know what, when the all the world said, "Their done", they stood back up and brought a haymaker of their own.  Our stars shined bright.  Jordan Shipley had 10 catches for 122 yards and 2 TD's.  Sergio Kindle was a stud.  Our coaches had the team prepared to win the National Championship.  The 2009 Texas Longhorns were who we thought they were.

All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would give the quarterbacks, running backs, and O-Line a little more credit

Protection was better this game, all the way up until the fateful hit, Gilbert was getting time in the pocket, though we did succeed mostly in our running around the outside, but what would you expect against Mt. Cody? We did manage to get some good running yards in, and no RB’s turned the ball over. And GG, on paper looks terrible, I cannot imagine anyone performing any better than he did in that situation, and in the second half he was absolutely inspired.

I think your overall grades are probably correct, but I would say relative to the circumstances I think a lot of the team played above their level.

On defense I would bump the backs up to a B+ at least, because their pass defense was A+, but the run defense would drop the overall grade down. A lot of big gains Ingram got were bumps to the outside where I felt a safety should have been waiting for hiim 2-3 yards off the LOS.

by notsofst on Jan 9, 2010 12:52 PM CST reply actions  

I'm glad you did this...and I agree for the most part.

Except as follows:

Coaching, B – I applaud Greg Davis for making the adjustments in the third quarter, but why so long? Is there some unwritten rule about making changes in first half?!?!?! Also, why not try something like the Wild Horn immediately after Colt went down to give Gilbert a few more precious seconds/minutes to get perspective/warm up? I condemn Davis for being predictable, if we had to be SOOO darn predictable on the run why not bring in the FB and run out of the power ‘I’ instead of trying to run out of our offset lone back. Def and Spec Teams coaching was very good (A to A- so in essence I give Davis a C – to D to drag the overall grade to B -)

QB, C+ Just because an 18-19 year old being tossed into that situation is just crazy…that he ended up leading very efficient drives and making many good throws (4-5 of which were easy catches that were dropped) deserves another half a grade point.

RB, INC I write this because I think we have some really talented guys that are being wasted for lack of blocking up front. You really can’t downgrade any of these guys for failing to make holes against a def of this caliber. The running game at UT has fallen on hard times and to the extent that is Davis or McWhorter’s fault I refer back to my ‘D’ for coaching. You can’t tell me in w halfway decent blocking that we couldn’t have run just as well as AL with a D.J., Fozzy, Cody, etc attack.

OL, C – in second half/D in first half. Let’s see we had an early chop, false start and leg whip all before end of first quarter. Really poor. I thought OL did better w/out Hall in at Center for awhile which is hard to swallow. I’ve heard rumors of McWhorter’s retirement and I hope if it is true we use some of that highest valued program money to get a real teacher/innovator in there. I know we have had zero help at TE either by scheme (flex) or by Smith’s general inability to either block or catch consistently. That happens when you lose your top 4 early in the year, but why for Pete’s sake didn’t we convert a backup OL to TE for Max Protect or true running downs, couldn’t have been more telegraphed than when Smith’s no catchin’ buns were in there!

Def grades were all on point, and while I know it will be harsh to loose Earl Thomas I have high hopes we can get some better play from new personnel at safety. Gideon bless his soul is a tough kid and plays his best every down but he was responsible for trying to slow down that run up the middle for a TD, and while he made that nice pick on the under thrown fake punt, I tend to think he’d be better coming off the bench to spell a more talented Safety. D-line and LB’s performed very well against an O-line that was supposed to dominate them. Way to show the world that Big XII plays Def too!

by longhornJ on Jan 9, 2010 12:59 PM CST reply actions  

a few disagreements

he didnt make any changes to give gg more time to get used to the college game.
we cant use wildhorn or somekinda wildcat offense because gg isnt a runner. sorry the days of vy and colt are gone.
gd i think did a fairly good job. i would have liked to see newton get a few more carries in the second half, but overall he did good

by AlDe2356 on Jan 9, 2010 3:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I actually meant revive the Wildhorn w/Chiles until GG was ready...

run a few sets with Chiles in there (assuming they even still practice that set) and maybe even let Chiles try a pass out of it or something. no way I would have asked GG to run Wildhorn for sure…

by longhornJ on Jan 11, 2010 5:15 PM CST up reply actions  

The Unblocked Blitzer

I blame that one more on GD… In an empty set, a blitzing linebacker is almost guaranteed to come free. GG had been doing nothing but long passing plays after holding the ball in the pocket for several seconds. If we can’t play with an RB in the game with three and a half minutes on the clock, then you’re almost forcing Saban’s* hand.

  • 666

by Tackchevy on Jan 9, 2010 2:38 PM CST reply actions  

I kind of agree on this one

Colt has been nailed by an unblocked man on that same set… the failure there might be somewhat more systematic.

Was anyone surprised at the result of that play? I could see him showing blitz and could just hope GG noticed or got the ball off in time. It’s happened to us before.

GG said that he felt the blitz coming, but it just got there too fast.

by notsofst on Jan 9, 2010 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

There weren't too many to block

Texas had enough blockers. Adam Ulatoski just blocked down and double teamed the end rather than picking up the blitzer. I’m not sure whether that mistake is the fault if the LT, the C, or the QB.

by aaronlybrand on Jan 10, 2010 1:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Same

One of those three should have picked up on it and said something. None of them did and it cost a potentially game winning drive at the most crucial of all times. Someone should have frickin’ noticed him.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

GG

He ran a lot in high school. I think he can run, he just needs to get bigger and faster.

The OL did a good job. When GG was in, the Alabama defense knew they were going to be conservative for a few series. Its hard enough for them to run block, and when the defense knows they are going to run its worse.

by Longhorns84 on Jan 9, 2010 5:59 PM CST reply actions  

You have to give Gilbert a lot of credit he had to grow up really fast for 56 min

and he almost pulled off a big upset. It would of been so sweet if we had won that game considering most the media was slobbering all over Bama’s and Ingraham’s nuts. I don’t know how many times I saw clips of Mark Ingrahams mom plus before and durning the game having to listen about Ingrahms daddy in prison. Dude give it a god damn rest you talk about him aswell as Bama as if they were the underdog!

by kcmorse on Jan 10, 2010 2:38 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn