Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Nebraska Cornhuskers Preview: Offense

I've been preparing all year for this game. 

Literally. I previewed the Huskers' offense and defense before the season began, analyzed the roster, predicted the move to a running-based attack centered around Martinez, and have both watched and written about their games. The hope was that we'd be spending this week discussing one of the most exciting and anticipated regular season match ups of recent memory. 

Nebraska did their part. Unfortunately, Texas has not.

Nevertheless, even with the Longhorns limping into Lincoln, this is an exceptionally exciting match up, with everything on the line for Nebraska, in what will be the final meeting between these two teams in Big 12 play. 

Texas won't be winning any trophies this year, but yet another win in Lincoln would be the next best thing.

NEBRASKA OFFENSIVE PREVIEW

QUARTERBACK:  When I wrote before the season that I thought Nebraska should and would go with Martinez at QB, I had his upside in mind, but the redshirt freshman has exceeded even the most wildly optimistic expectations. He's averaging 147 yards per game on the ground (4th nationally), at an obscene 10.8 yards per carry (1st nationally), rushing for 12 touchdowns along the way (also 1st nationally).

For some perspective, during his junior year Vince Young ran for 81 yards per game (53rd nationally), averaging 6.8 yards per carry (12th), scoring 12 touchdowns (23rd). That's right, Taylor Martinez has as many rushing touchdowns through his first 5 games as a redshirt freshman quarterback as Vince Young had in 13 games as a fourth-year junior.

Got your attention yet?

Star-divide

Is Martinez already as good as was Young? Hell no. First of all, Vince Young also led the nation in passing efficiency, throwing for 240 yards per game and 26 touchdowns. Second, Vince Young could pick up a piece of coal and say, "Diamond, bitch," and thirty thousand years would elapse in the blink of an eye. (Heat and pressure were his thing, y'know?) Third, and most important, when Texas needed every last bit of a 30-40 for 267 yards, plus 19 carries for 200 yards and 3 TDs performance, on the biggest stage imaginable, Vince Young delivered just that.

And that, other than to get Texas fans attention that this kid is damn good, is the other reason to bring up Vince Young. Martinez has never faced anything like what he's going to face on Saturday, and it's not a given that he'll be at his most brilliant when it matters most. Not only will he be facing what is by far the stiffest defense that he's faced to date, but he can't help but be aware just how much is riding on this game. For this season. For the Nebraska fans.

Returning to the field, Martinez has acquitted himself well as a passer so far in a limited role. He's only throwing it about 13 times per game, but he's completing 61 percent of his passes, and doing damage when he does, averaging an impressive 10.3 yards per attempt. Watching him against K-State compared to Western Kentucky, he's still very much raw as a passer, but he's decidedly more comfortable, the latter being the one that matters more.

As Martinez has grown more comfortable, his offensive coordinator Shawn Watson has properly expanded the way the passing game is used to complement the overall offensive attack. Martinez isn't substantially better a passer today than he was five weeks ago -- that kind of growth typically develops year-to-year -- but his being substantially more comfortable allows Nebraska to be more dynamic in what and how they attack a defense.

Everything is keyed around their running game, and if they have even reasonable success with it on Saturday, I fully expect Martinez to finish with no more than 15 passing attempts. If you think about this game as a coach for Nebraska, the thing is that even if Will Muschamp's unit does a solid job against your run game, limiting you to production that's only going to net 15-20 points, you absolutely embrace that unless and until the Texas offense gives you a reason to think you need to gun for more. For Nebraska, it's not so much "conservative" to load up on the rushing game; it's prudent, because it (1) is your strength and (2) minimizes the opportunity for a backbreaking mistake from a pick six or a costly sack and fumble. You run the ball, run the ball, and run the ball, and to the extent you're on track to put some points on the board doing so, you force Texas to match you offensively, and limit the opportunity for Texas' stronger unit to make big plays of its own.

Nebraska has shifted their formations to suit their multiple spread rush attack, and you'll see the splits in their offensive line similar to (but less drastic than) those we were used to seeing from Mike Leach's Air Raid squads. One of the elements that makes the offense Shawn Watson has developed tricky to defend is the difficulty in deciding upon whom your linebackers should be basing their reads. If your backers are keyed on the offensive line, you're in good shape to deal with both straightforward runs and misdirection given away by pulling linemen. But Nebraska's offensive attack has punishing counters for that approach -- like when, for example, they'll block down the line one way, then run a veer option play away from it, leaving your playside defensive end in a no-win choice: step to the running back and Martinez keeps and turns it upfield, or step to Martinez and your end's angle on the tailback is futile.

On the flipside, if you key your linebackers on the quarterback, you're effectively positioned to deal with the zone read and veer, but more vulnerable to the rest. What's impressive about what Shawn Watson and Nebraska is that Nebraska is genuinely multiple -- that is, adaptable -- and is both highly capable of and effective in running a variety of plays out of the same/similar formations. I'd love to see the numbers 2005 Vince Young would have put up in this offense -- 2,500 yards and 30 touchdowns isn't out of the realm of possibilities.

RUNNING BACK:  Complementing Martinez in the rushing game are the senior Roy Helu, Jr. and sophomore Rex Burkhead. If you've been following along with these write ups, you know that I was quick to retract my preseason skepticism about Burkhead, whose acceleration and versatility I underrated. He's clearly a gamer -- the football equivalent of a gym rat -- and Watson does an impressive job taking advantage of the different ways he can be deployed. The Huskers aren't afraid to use him as a normal rushing tailback, send him out to catch passes, sneak him in to the Wildcat, or run a play in which he runs wide before tossing a pass.

I speculated before the season that Nebraska's coaches would be conservative with their usage of Roy Helu, Jr. early in the season to keep him as fresh and healthy as possible for the contests in which he would be most needed, and they've done exactly that, the junior having toted it just 51 times through the first 5 games. He's made the most of his carries, racking up 8.1 yards per carry and 5 touchdowns, and like Cedric Benson in 2004 he's enjoying the spoils of playing alongside a dangerous rushing QB.

OFFENSIVE LINE:  Along the line, Nebraska has taken a solid step forward from last year, despite some injuries and without any substantial upgrades in talent. Most impressive have been the guards, Keith Williams and Ricky Henry, followed by tackle DJ Jones, whose performance is finally better matching his potential. As noted before the season, center Mike Caputo is undersized, but he's quick and he works for it. Among all the match ups, I'm most keen on seeing whether Randall and Okafor can make Caputo an afternoon-long problem for Nebraska.

This group is not exceptionally strong, but they're nimble, they're cohesive, and most importantly, they execute with authority and purpose. Ricky Henry is probably the best example, and a testament to the idea that coaching and development can and do matter in these regards. This is a guy who a year ago was merely adequate but, while no more leaping off the page as an excellent NFL prospect this year than last, is performing at a level that, if sustained, will land him on some All-Conference teams. He's as solid as you could hope a guy to be, and he finishes his blocks with a sense of determination sorely lacking from our own linemen of late.

All told, this is a group that knows what it's supposed to be doing and performs accordingly. The task on Saturday is to beat them in gaps enough that they lose some of that authority and purpose. The battle up front is to get them on their heels -- get them to hesitate, even a little.  It could make a big, decisive difference.

WIDE RECEIVERS:  As noted before, if Nebraska is running the ball with even modest success, the passing game just won't be a big factor in this game, but the personnel are still worth discussing, because even if Nebraska's able to rush the ball for 80 percent of their plays, the receivers do play a role in the running game. This is a unit with size, strength, and willingness to block, and our DBs will be challenged to work for the assist in rush support.

Niles Paul is the most polished of the group, a guy who would rack 1,000 yards and 15 scores if he played for Oklahoma State this year. His top-end speed is very good -- a bit short of elite -- and he's both strong and (when he's engaged and mentally concentrating) sure. He has a tendency to get bored and lose focus -- perhaps understandable under the circumstances -- but when he's focused and disciplined, he can and will make you pay if you sleep on him. While I think he's coverable one-on-one, the difficulty that arises lies in the necessity of your DBs to step up and assist in stopping the run game. Very few DBs are capable of wearing both hats well, but we'll need Williams and the Browns to give us just that.

Junior wideout Brandon Kinnie is nominally the second receiver, but I think I fear his big play potential even more so than Paul. Kinnie is a very tall, long receiver who like Malcolm Williams is deceptive in the amount of ground that he covers across his somewhat awkward, loping gait. It's easy to take wrong angles on him and his ability to put his physical attributes to work in creating separation is finally beginning to ripen. I'm looking to Chykie Brown for this match up, and it'll be a great opportunity for him to deliver the kind of performance that makes him attractive to the NFL. He's got the size and length to deal with Kinnie in coverage, but will have to be physical and aggressive to be helpful in run support and any sloppy mistakes are likely to be highly visible big plays.

The last name to know is TE/WR Mike McNeil, whose easiest comp is probably the Indianapolis Colts' Dallas Clark. McNeil isn't exactly a burner, but he moves well and is more athletic than you'd imagine. He's got fantastic hands, is easy to lose track of, and gets used in smart ways that tend to punish overly-run-oriented safeties. That's an area of weakness on this Texas defense, and if we're doing well with the run in part because of work Vaccaro and Scott are doing, you'll see Shawn Watson try to make us pay for that with McNeil.

CONCLUSION

What's this all boil down to for Will Muschamp? I'm focused on the following five points:

1. Disruption up the middle.  This is a fast Texas defense, and if you're forced to run out before you can run up, you're in trouble. I'm worried as a Nebraska fan if Randall and Okafor -- who's coming on exceptionally fast -- are shooting gaps and causing backfield disruption like their names are Lamarr Houston.

2. Disciplined, physical secondary support.  Too often against UCLA, our safeties missiled up into the pile, which is counterproductive. We'll need our DBs to be physical and aggressive, but everyone has to stay within their defined roles and purposes. That's a lot easier said than done, but Nebraska is very well equipped to exploit blind plowing.

3. Improved play from our safeties.  Riding the coattails of that previous point, this is a different game than the one we won last year, when Blake Gideon was able to play center field against a crappy Zac Lee passing the ball. This year, we need our strong safety wearing multiple hats, and all of them well. He was effective as Earl Thomas's roaming safety net last year. We need more than that this year. Can he give it to us? And if not, will he continue to play every snap? And are Scott and Vaccaro experienced enough to make a difference?

4. Rattle Martinez. This one's tricky, because if we were feeling good about our offense, I think I'd recommend precisely the opposite tact -- making Martinez earn it. There are two problems with that approach, however. First, twice we've seen our defense left out on the field for long stretches at a time, and that's precisely what you want from the opposing vantage point. And second, it just doesn't seem prudent to be content with trying to make Martinez grind out 20 points when that may be plenty to win it.

To the extent one sees it that way, the better approach is to try and throw Martinez off his game early. You risk giving up the big play, and that's especially frightening given that the one weakness of Muschamp defenses has tended to be slow starts, but if there's one thing that's sure to give Texas a good chance in this one, it's Martinez struggling. If we can introduce hesitation and caution in him early, all the better.

5. Red zone efficiency.  The danger with trying to get after Martinez is that our aggression increases the possibility of getting burned on big plays, but so long as they don't go for touchdowns, we can live with a few if when Nebraska finds itself in the red zone, they're forced to turn to the air to score six. That plays to our strengths and increases our opportunities to make a Martinez-rattling play.

And that, really, is what this boils down to defensively. Can Texas be a disruptive force at the line of scrimmage without allowing Nebraska to make us pay for that aggression with six points? If so, this will be interesting, especially if we succeed in forcing Martinez into a few costly mistakes. On the flipside, the smoother the sailing for Nebraska, the gloomier Texas's prospects, even if Nebraska's achieving only modest success. That'll be enough if our offense isn't forcing them to gun for more.

For more coverage of this game, visit SB Nation's outstanding Nebraska blog Corn Nation, and be sure to read the always-excellent take of Barking Carnival's Scipio Tex.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The first key is obviously to stop the run

if they are passing on a consistent basis, we have already won the battle. Sadly, this year’s defense has been sort of exposed as essentially one dimensional. Great passing defense, designed to neutralize spread offenses, but will get punished and worn out by power running games (especially if the offense can’t stay on the damn field).

If we want to keep this game close, we need to be able to force some turnovers, something this team has struggled with mightily. Would be nice if we could get anything positive out of special teams as well.

I just hope GD actually lets Gilbert loose, especially with Mike Davis back. It will be nice to see Davis, Goodwin, and Monroe all hopefully playing roles on offense.

by goingforthecorner on Oct 14, 2010 1:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks for the breakdown Peter, well done.

If the Horns stay focused, play at their positions well and for heaven sake have less mistakes, they’ll be ok.

My prediction: Many errors for both teams, UT will have less than they’ve been. Martinez will run for massive yards but have more turnovers than normal. Garrett will shine.

by ogg on Oct 14, 2010 1:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Captain illogical says

Kansas State/Cal beat UCLA;
UCLA stomped beat Texas;
Stanford, Nevada beatdown Cal;
Colorado beat Cal/Georgia;
Georgia creamed Tennessee;
Tennessee plays defense with 13 men and solidifies the Tao of Les Miles legend….
and Nebraska annihilates Kansas State on the road.

You just can’t make this sh*t up.

And then there’s this…..

Texas is 9-4 all-time and 8-1 in Big XII play vs. Nebraska.
Mack Brown has lost only 2 games to Big XII north foe on the road (both to Kansas State).

And this…

tmagic
h/t Ace @ Barking Carnival

Perplexing previews to say the least.

Great overview, PB. Coach Ballhawk better have it dialed in as this squad holds our best chance at winning. Turnovers and field position have to be the difference.

by TXStampede on Oct 14, 2010 4:11 AM CDT reply actions  

Great preview

You make a great point in the advantage of getting to Martinez. This is a very prototypical set up for the rattled young QB meltdown we’ve seen time and again. Of course the approach in doing so will differ as to the teams involved, but a multitude of examples show us that greener QBs are extremely susceptible to being over-hyped, nervous, over-confident, intimidated, exposed, or all of the above. We may have seen a touch of that in Denard Robinson last week at home vs. the Spartans. Anyone paying attention would know that while his numbers are impressive and the kid has obvious talents, it was still early in the season when the media was lining up in Ann Arbor and the Mark Mays of the world prematurely elevate him to the farce that is the Heisman campaign.

The same could quite possibly be true with Martinez. In fact, the stage is perfectly set for such a disruption to his confidence, the fans, and in turn, the rest of the team. Of all teams to truly rattle the kid, Texas is aligned perfectly coming in after two losses against a team that is maybe a bit disappointed that they won’t be drawing any blood from an undefeated Longhorn squad. That said, I am glad MB & Co. have been virtually silent these two weeks.

Hook em.

by Infield Elephant on Oct 14, 2010 9:05 AM CDT reply actions  

very thorough

if you watch the NU offense on TV from the end zone shot, you can see their wide splits for the O-lineman. it looks intimidating to think of those huge holes already there and how well they execute. gonna be tough sledding.

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Oct 14, 2010 9:45 AM CDT reply actions  

DJ Jones, not Marcel

Marcel Jones hasn’t taken a snap at RT this year, so I’m not sure where your evaluation of him came from. DJ Jones has started the last 8 games for Nebraska at RT and done a heckuva job. We’ve seen a ton of big runs over that right side, and along with Ricky Henry (at RG), DJ Jones has been getting the job done. Gonna be a tough test for the entire O-line against Texas, however…

by DJHusker7 on Oct 14, 2010 9:50 AM CDT reply actions  

D'oh

Just a mental lapse. I meant DJ, obviously.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Oct 14, 2010 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Marcel Jones is back

He was ready to play last week and will probably get a few snaps this Saturday, just some added depth.

To the Texas fans hoping NU thinks they have this game won, NOT SO FAST! They are more ready and hyped for this game than any so far.

by JGHusker on Oct 14, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

great, great, great post.
He’s clearly a gamer — the football equivalent of a gym rat

lol you guys ever watch “The league” on FX?

I agree with all of your points, if you do these things effectively it will make for a winnable game for Texas. On the point of rattling Martinez, while it would be extremely prudent for Texas to do so, I’m not sure how possible it will be. I’ve watched a few interviews he has done (post game) and they’ve asked him how he managed to keep it all together in hostile environments (this was after the UW game, at kickoff the cameras were shaking it was so loud in that place) and he kept on about he he just didn’t ever get nervous..they basically asked him how he knew that for sure being as how he hadn’t played in the most nerve wracking of situations, and he just kept saying, “I don’t ever get nervous, I don’t ever get nervous” to every one of their questions. Sorry this is a lame post, it’s early and i haven’t had much coffee yet, lol.

by Ceek on Oct 14, 2010 10:04 AM CDT reply actions  

More than being nervous,

I think it would be about affecting his decision making. If our D is on and speedy as usual, he may get thrown off, having never faced anything close to this yet (this is assuming our D is on, which I expect it to be). Kheeston Randall, Jackson Jeffcoat, Eddie Jones, Alex Okafor, a couple Achos, all coming hard at a redshirt freshman has the makings of exposure when he suddenly isn’t so sure what move to make.

That’s not to say I am doubting the kid. More so, just to dig up any confidence I have two days out. I am fully prepared to say, “Yeah, never mind, he’s really that good”.

by Infield Elephant on Oct 14, 2010 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I got ya

not trying to rain on anyone’s confidence parade, just jonesing for some football talk before I start drinking tomorrow in preparation for the game.

by Ceek on Oct 14, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

yep

went to the wal last night and got supplies for riot punch and 5 racks of babybacks to smoke, stop by my tailgate in linc if you’re coming to the game, should be a blasty.

by Ceek on Oct 14, 2010 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

This.

I’m not worried about Taylor Martinez getting nervous. I’m worried about Taylor Martinez making poor decisions, like in the S.D. State game. Or fumbling. That makes me worried, too.

by Cheeseandcorn on Oct 14, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Martinez is one mature redshirt freshman, despite his poor decisions in that game. You probably don’t have much to worry about. He will be in the Heisman talk the next few years.

He will get by our defense, but I’m just hoping we can contain him 75% of the time. Then we have a chance.

by dimecoverage on Oct 14, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Might have to add something to the end there

Then we have a chance if our offense comes out with a pulse.

If our offense looks much like they have the past three games, then our defense has to contain him more like 95% of the time, unfortunately. Which is asking a bit too much.

by TheElusiveShadow on Oct 14, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Never faced anything close to this yet?

Sorry elephant, but Martinez faces the blackshirts every day in practice, and if you look at the stats, the longhorns aren’t even close.

by travelr64 on Oct 14, 2010 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Noted.

That’s why I clarified the assumption that our D is on. I won’t argue with stats or the blackshirts in practice (tempting though), but if you’ve watched the Horns’ defense when they are not pulling most of the weight, it is apparent that yes, the Huskers have not faced such a defense yet.

To your point, I could be wrong after tomorrow. The jury might still be out on our D, at least in determining whether they are good or great.

by Infield Elephant on Oct 15, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting thing about Taylor Martinez

He’s becoming well-known for his complete lack of emotion. Watch his postgame interviews, that’s the only time he’ll even talk to the media…the kid is plain as a white fence in Plainsville. He wants his play to do the talking. I’d be very surprised to see him get rattled…everyone on the team says he doesn’t get nervous and that it doesn’t matter if he’s just ran for an 80 yard touchdown or he’s thrown an interception…he’s always the same. That’s why going on the road at Washington and Kansas State did nothing to him and he played almost perfectly in both games. I think he just overlooked South Dakota State (his only below average game) and was trying too hard to make plays happen.

I do see him having a tough game, but I don’t think he’s going to make a lot of mental mistakes, even though he’s a redshirt freshman. And if all else fails, they’ll just hand it off to Helu or Burkhead every play and those guys are dangerous as you mentioned.

by Billgrip on Oct 14, 2010 10:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Also...

I have a feeling they will run something like a flash 44 reverse (ran against Oklahoma in the 2001 game) with a pass from Rex Burkhead to Taylor Martinez. Taylor Martinez practiced as a receiver quite a bit as a redshirt freshman last year and Burkhead used to be a QB in high school…and a darn good one I’ve heard.

by Billgrip on Oct 14, 2010 10:18 AM CDT reply actions  

That’s just a “for fun” prediction though =]

by Billgrip on Oct 14, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wish a play like that

was even in the realm of possibility for our offense.

…sigh.

by Infield Elephant on Oct 14, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Black 41 Flash Reverse Pass

It’s one of our few big moments in the Big 12, after all.

by Albino Tornado on Oct 14, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Going to be a great game

Very good article, Mr. Bean. I’ll tell you UT’s current record doesn’t affect how Huskers view this game. It’s as big as regular season games get. I also disregard ratings of either team. Both teams are very good.

History shows us this will be a hard fought, close game. Most the previous games have come down to a few crazy plays and just a few points.

It’ll be fun. Go Big Red!

by 4LoJoe on Oct 14, 2010 10:40 AM CDT reply actions  

I was just thinking the other day how our 2005 offense would look

If we ran something like Nebraska’s offense today. To be fair, Vince Young was sitting most fourth quarters since we blew out most of the teams we played, and we shared the ball more in scoring position rather than just wrack up Vince’s stats (like Urban Meyer did for Tebow).

It’s not fair that we probably have to ask our defense to either score for us or set up scores for our offense. But that’s what probably needs to happen, because I don’t expect a whole lot out of our offense. I’d love to be proven wrong here, but color me pessimistic. We have the best defense that Nebraska has seen so far, but that’s true for us as well. I await your preview of their defense to give me some measure of hope.

by TheElusiveShadow on Oct 14, 2010 11:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Martinez has played in the 4th quarter of only one game this year, if you havent noticed the Huskers have been blowing teams out lately as well. Your statement about being fair to Young because he built his stats largely thru 3 quarters of play is exactly the way Martinez has. Your point about sharing the ball more in scoring position is well taken except that Martinez has 5 td runs of less than 20 yrds, meaning his runs outside the red zone were 35,41,46,57,80 and 80. Plus Helu who has 5 tds on runs of 3,8,58,65 and 68..means this offense doesnt have much time to share the ball..most drives consist of five or six plays at most.

by RedderThanYou on Oct 14, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Whoa, calm down there buddy

I had no intention of disrespecting Martinez. I’ve watched him all year and I’ve been very impressed. I only mentioned the stuff about Vince because PB brought him up in speculating what kind of numbers he’d produce in Nebraska’s offense. After all, every single home game Texas played that year was flat over at halftime. Also, as PB mentioned, there was a more conscious effort to throw the ball, as evidenced by Vince’s 26 touchdowns and 3,000+ yards passing.

If anything, we bring these points up to show why VY was the superior player over Reggie Bush that year (and that’s why he deserved to Heisman). I wasn’t trying to crap all over Martinez’s performance so far.

by TheElusiveShadow on Oct 14, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

FWIW

Martinez has played much more in the 4th quarter than VY did his Jr. season. Not that it matters. Comparing them is like comparing a rocket launcher to a nuke.

by GoHornsGo90 on Oct 14, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Longhorns better be treating this game like it's the friggin SuperBowl

Penalties, missed blocks, and any lack of aggression or situational awareness will get the Horns sunk and fast.

Upside is, the Longhorns are playing with National Championship caliber talent on the roster, and if we’re lucky, NU’s already thinking they’ve got this game won.

NU’s played no one yet, and we’ve already taken our lumps.

Wyoming and UCLA will have been good warm-ups for the mobility we’re going to see, and we’ve had two weeks to prepare.

I think we can win it, but we’ll have to play our best game so far to even have a shot at it.

by notsofst on Oct 14, 2010 11:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Some NU fans think we've got this won...

But I guarantee you that the players aren’t thinking that. Just read some of the comments from this week. Nebraska knows that Texas is a good team, and all the players seem to have a very strong desire to play their best football in this game because they know Texas has the athletes to win, regardless of your record. And trust me, the players who lost so heartbreakingly in the Big 12 championship last season have been looking forward to this- a shot to beat Texas, a shot at redemption, a shot to play all out every play and finish what they started last season.

by Billgrip on Oct 14, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Winnable for Horns?

Can the Horns win this game, of course they can. Are they facing an uphill battle ? most definitley. If they think Oklahoma was a challenge, and UCLA was a good team…they might be overwhelmed when they see the talent they line up across from Saturday. Nebraska is loaded,they have played all season with their two second string linbackers, both of who are playing right now like they might both be on the Big 12 all-conference team, they get Wil Compton back this week who was one of the starters before injury sidelined him for the first 5 games, the O-Line got Marcel Jones( another sidelined starter) back and he looks good to go. The Huskers return 17 of 22 starters from the Big 12 championship game team…make no mistake this is one game that they will be focused. The two games Texas lost were both at home ( or nearly at home with OU in Dallas) and now they go on the road for the third time and not against Rice, or Texas Tech a team that gave up 52 points to Iowa state but only 24 to the Longhorns in a ten point loss. Coming into Lincoln, the last time these two teams will meet in their short history (this will only be the 14th time the two have played) will add fuel to the Huskers fire who are determined it seems to leave the Big 12 on a winning note. This could be a great game, or a Nebraska blowout.

by RedderThanYou on Oct 14, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Uh...
or nearly at home with OU in Dallas

This is nitpicky, but this has always been a pet peeve of mine. You might want to review your college football there, because that’s a neutral site game. OU fans consider it neutral and Texas fans consider it neutral. 50/50 split, and Dallas is actually slightly closer to Norman than Austin. It is not a home game, or “nearly” a home game, for the Longhorns. Not even close.

by TheElusiveShadow on Oct 14, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

sorry, Shadow

Didn’t see your post before I posted mine. At least I added a tiny something…maybe

by HookTech on Oct 15, 2010 1:33 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

OU game

I’d have to check, but I’m pretty sure Dallas is closer to Norman than Austin. Either way it’s still a pretty neutral site. I don’t think Texas is a team that plays markedly better at than on the road. If you looked up stats on regular season losses in the past ten years, you’d probably see a nearly 50/50 split.

by HookTech on Oct 15, 2010 1:31 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not so sure.

First, I disagree that Kansas state is “no one.” Also, while we may have NC potential, I don’t think our QB, RB’s, and OL are NC caliber at this point. But I do agree that if they continue with business as usual in terms of penalties, missed tackles, missed blocks, and turn-overs, we will be blown out.

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Oct 14, 2010 11:40 AM CDT reply actions  

Oct 16th

Texas stopping or rattling Martinez is harder than it may seem. Martinez was not rattled at Washington(extremely loud stadium and first road start),or K-state another hostile anti Husker environment. I have been watching the Huskers forever and he is probably the coolest customer that I can remember. I will give you the fact the Texas defense is the best he will have played this year to date. Martinez is like a robot he has yet to get rattled good luck trying to. Now if God forbid Martinez gets hurt they better skip(Texas high school star) Green and go straight to Lee.

Now for Gilbert I think he is a good qb I will give you that. I think Gilbert will get more rattled than Martinez though. Here’s food for thought stats on two of the top 5(draft eligible) qb’s versus Nebraska. Washington’s Jake Locker(Mel Kiper’s pre season #1 overall pick) was 4-20 with 2 int’s and 71 yards at home. This game effectively stopped his Heisman hopes in their tracks. Next up Nathan Enderle (Idaho in most top 5 qb rankings) 16-31 141 yards 5 int’s and 1 td’s. The td and many of the yards came in the 4th quarter versus backups. Two top 5 qb’s combined stats 20-51 7int’s, 1 garbage time td and 212 yards. Even a Texas sized ego probably can’t picture Gilbert against this defense having a big game. UCLA’S Prince looked like a speedster aginst your defense and I am faster than him with flip flops on. Good luck in the game my prediction is closer than it should be 31-20 red guys win! GBR!

by schusker on Oct 14, 2010 12:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Test's for mobility

Notsofst did you really say UCLA was a good test for the mobility you will see versus Nebraska that’s laughable. Martinez is averaging more rushing ypg (147) than the UCLA qb Prince has for the year a whopping 110 for the whole year in 6 games. Yes it’s probably time to rethink that one! Prince couldnt beat Martinez in a race if Martinez ran backwards. Prince by the way had his biggest game rushing versus Texas. I will have to plead ignorance on what Wyomings qb did versus Texas but he only has 108 yards rushing on the year so cleary he is not in Martinez’s league. Good luck saturday I think it will be close 31-20 Huskers win!

by schusker on Oct 14, 2010 12:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Kansas State

For the horn fans who say what Martinez did against KSU is nothing. KSU may not be world beaters but they can beat UCLA something Texas didnt even come close to doing. And while you bash KSU remember they beat you the last two times you played them. The last time you were ranked 7th when they beat you. Although I am not a KSU fan this is a tradition that continues after we leave and before the big whatever folds due to bad management.

by schusker on Oct 14, 2010 12:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Turnovers and field position will decide this

While all of the focus has been on Martinez vs. the UT defense, the UT offense vs the Blackshirts is just as important. Like the NU offense, the UT offense will be facing the best defense they’ll play this year. On top of that, Memorial Stadium is going to be by far the most hostile environment the Texas offense has to deal with this year (Lubbock probably wins the nastiest, but I’m talking loud). Gilbert will need to play better than he ever has for Texas to win this one. A 2 or 3 interception game won’t cut it.

With all that said, I’m still scared to death. The Huskers being -1 or -2 in turnovers would be more than enough to make this a game. I’m betting both OC’s will be playing it very conservative unless they have to open things up to catch up. The team that has to do that first is going to lose.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Oct 14, 2010 12:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Heh

I’ll say a quick prayer for your blood pressure when UT runs a bubble screen for a loss of 3 on the opening play. :P

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Oct 14, 2010 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Texas at Nebraska

Pelini expressed it well when he reminded everyone that Texas in spite of the recent losses still has a ton of team speed and athleticism, and pretty good coaching. I think where a lot of people will be surprised this Saturday is that Nebraska’s team speed is a step faster than Texas’ in most areas, and what Nebraska’s offense’ biggest strength is that they put you in such large gap disadvantages before the play begins that Texas may need that speed to chase down Huskers in open space for most of the day, whether the Huskers convert long six pointers or a series of chunks of offense enroute only dictates how long the longhorns are going to have to leave their defense on the field. What texas needs to be careful of is a slow start defensivley, because of the “blood in the water” approach Watson and his offense exhibit. When the Huskers get it rollin’ they like to roll over you until your coaches take the headsets off( could be the end of the third quarter). I don’t look for Texas to do much on offense against a defense that has something to prove to the Big Twelve and national media that continue to portray Texas D as no.1….this could get ugly.

by RedderThanYou on Oct 14, 2010 1:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Anyone Saying Huskers Have This Won

Is a blowhard and an idiot to boot. Every Husker fan you talk to, everything you read from the players and coaches shows nothing but respectful anticipation of a great team coming to town.
Like others here have said, Martinez doesn’t seem to get nervous or rattled, but when rushed he doesn’t have the experience yet to make good decisions; just look at SDSU. With the speed Texas brings to the field, that is my biggest worry. That, and fumbles. Nebraska seems to specialize in killing ourselves with fumbles.
Pete, excellent article. One of the most thoughtful and analytical breakdowns I have read, and your professionalism doing so puts many of the other boards to sad, sad shame. Here’s to a great game, welcome all you Horns coming to Lincoln, lets have fun!

by UltimaRatioRegum on Oct 14, 2010 1:34 PM CDT reply actions  

You obviously have missed the first 5 games of the season.

Your point about coming out and declaring a win is well put, but when someone “predicts” a win that doesn’t make them a blowhard nor an idiot, it makes them a prognosticator. The Huskers do put the ball on the ground a bit too much for my liking the have fumbled 16 times in 5 games ( 12 in the first three games in which they lost 6 of those) losing a total of 7 and with Martinez’s 3 int’s 10 turnovers in 5 games. These things have a habit of working out however when you consider the other team ( Texas in this case) has 10 fumbles in 5 games (7 in the last 2, losing 5 of those) and 7 total lost fumbles..hmmm sound familiar, they also have 5 ints all in the last 3 games. being nervous is ok and you sound nervous, but looking at the facts based on the season so far…I’d be pretty confident as a Husker fan that the best team on the field on Saturday is going to have a Big Red N on the side of their helmet. Here’s to confident, respectful fans.

by RedderThanYou on Oct 14, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good Points

and I say the one thing in your favor is that your HC/OC combo appears to be a little more alert on gameday than their counterparts from Austin.

That said, we have lost quite a few games in the past few years when “the best team on the field on Saturday [had a burnt orange longhorn] on the side of their helmet.”

From a gambling perspective, I’d suspect that people have “overbought” Nebraska a little bit (which is not to say that they’re still not the prohibitive favorite). I like Texas here as a longer shot playing as an underdog. Here’s hoping that the Huskers have a game in Lincoln just like the one (almost a year to the day) they had against Iowa State.

by Awal on Oct 14, 2010 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Martinez is super fast

But he does leave that ball hanging out there and Texas may get a few lucky breaks. If we can capitalize on those we have a chance. I wasn’t as impressed with Burkhead, but again, I wondered why this was a kid we didn’t offer playing decent reps for another oos team.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 14, 2010 2:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Could be a tough weekend

My 15 year old JRT puppy is just about to check out and I’m not sure the Horn’s are any better shape. I bought an extra bottle of scotch just in case.

by rmaxearnest on Oct 14, 2010 2:15 PM CDT reply actions  

This is setting up rather nicely for the Horns

Much rather go to Lincoln as the “underdog” than the favorite. We have little to lose now, but a lot to gain. We sure know how to take the fun out of NU football. Even if they beat us now it won’t be that big a deal.
I think we may surprise a few folks if we contain Martinez. Of course, that is a big IF. Also, our 2 losses give GD permission from himself to try a few more plays. Unlikely, but still possible.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 14, 2010 2:37 PM CDT reply actions  

This thread has become a total NU circle jerk

“Wait till you line up against our talent”
“Martinez is way faster than anyone you’ve ever seen”
“Martinez never gets rattled”

Spare me, let’s just watch the game.

by owenh on Oct 14, 2010 3:54 PM CDT reply actions  

To be honest

I’m not really seeing that at all. Apart from statements about Martinez being tough to rattle (let’s face it, with trips to Washington and KSU behind him, he’s not a typical freshman). But overall, it’s been a pretty even handed productive discussion by both fan bases.

"My hardest job is to convince the people of Nebraska that 10-1 is not a losing season." - Tom Osborne

by jdhusker on Oct 14, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good analysis overall

Very good and balanced analysis. Force Nebraska to throw and see what happens. MAYBE Martinez can throw for 300 yards without breaking a sweat—but maybe not. You KNOW what he can do on the ground, and along with Helu and Burkhead, you don’t want Nebraska running the ball all day.

Like you said, forcing Martinez to throw, I think, also increases the potential for mistakes and thus big plays by your defense.

I think Texas will definitely have to hold Nebraska to fewer points than OU scored. At this point in the season, Nebraska’s defense is a LOT saltier than the Sooners and barring some big plays on defense or special teams for UT, I don’t think they’ll score more than the 20 they did against OU. Also, I think it’s a fair point that Gilbert hasn’t exactly been Mr. Calm, Cool, and Collected in the pocket—and as a first year starter, on the road, no less, will be just as susceptible as Martinez to getting rattled and making some mistakes against Nebraska’s formidable secondary.

I think it will be a great game. Texas still has a LOT of play-makers and speed all over the field. They have a lot of pride, and won’t want to lose three in a row. Nebraska, of course, is playing to avenge the demons of last year (heck, who are we kidding, the demons of the last 14 years).

by huskerfanbb on Oct 14, 2010 4:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Great article

I’m a lifelong Husker fan (and alum) and want to complement you on a very professionally written article. You seem to have done your homework very well, and your analysis is thorough and thoughtful.

You need to be writing for ESPN, you’re better than most of what I read there. :)

I think its going to be a great game, and I think Nebraska wins it. The only way they lose is if they make enough mistakes to beat themselves, and to be honest – Texas has shown as much or more ability to do that as Nebraska. Go Huskers!

by DallasHuskerFan on Oct 14, 2010 4:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Great article. This one is all about D.

I look forward to watching for your keys to this game. You scouted NE well. One thing you may have missed is that, although playing very hard, the NE LBs have repeatedly frustrated the coaching staff with poor adjustments from play to play.

Personally, I think the TX D will be a serious problem. If TX’s offense can avoid throwing too many interceptions, earn a couple TDs, and at least a FG off the obligatory Niles Paul fumble, I predict bad things for my Huskers.

This one will be all about defense.

- dan

by Dan Elliott on Oct 14, 2010 6:02 PM CDT reply actions  

Dan

He was previewing the offense, so he didn’t “miss” the play of the linebackers. It wasn’t the subject of his article.

by huskerfanbb on Oct 14, 2010 9:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Nebraskas D versus Texas O

What many are not looking at is can Texas pass versus Nebraska? I think Texas will have a hard time passing versus Nebraska. Two of the top 5 qb’s per the experts have been a pedestrian combined 20-51 7int’s, 1 garbage time td and 212 yards. Nebraska has the #1 ranked pass defense in the country. Gilbert is not near as good as Locker and Enderle but maybe he will do good who knows. Texas has not proven that they can run the ball at all but who knows what saturday will bring.GBR!

by schusker on Oct 14, 2010 9:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Distill the blog

Texas strength is its defense. It must rattle Martinez to avoid too many points, either rushing (I-backs or Martinez) or Martinez passing (this is likely strategy one of N, Martinez is a skilled passer). Texas offense on N defense is much, much more problematic, for Texas. N is better on defense than last year and Texas is decidedly more inept than last year. Result? Texas scores few points. Nebraska either does, or does not, score many points, but enough to win. Texas feels good if it relatively “contains” the quarterback zone reads, i back runs, and passes to talented receivers. Meanwhile, in the converse of last year, Texas has no meaningful offense to match against another ferocious N defense. Hence, if Texas rattles T Magic, it looses by two touchdowns. If Texas doesn’t contain Martinez, 4 quick rushing touchdowns on ESPN will be shown concerning the Texas blowout and talk will renew as to the #1 ratings. One way or the other, Texas will simply be roadkill in Nebraska’s rearview mirror. Nebraska’s immediate goals are simple. Take the Big 12, and leave, and then win the Big Ten. Texas, this year, although it perceives itself as more, is simply a stepping stone to this goal. Texas beat Nebraska during 1998-2008, to be sure, during Nebraska’s lost decade. Everyone who has never beaten Nebraska beat them during this lost decade. However, the order has now been restored. Nebraska, as it should be is back at the top fat is was from 1970-1998. Texas’ brief 5 years of glory in the early 2000’s is over, until Texas makes a meaningful attempt to recapture its’ glory.

by Barrister on Oct 14, 2010 11:47 PM CDT reply actions  

What UT Hasn't seen yet

NU so far has stifled two of the top QB prospects without showing much, if any, of their blitz packages. File it under “a friend of a friend of a third cousin told me….”, but the word is, the Pelini Bros. have a ton of blitz packages they’ve been saving for……shall we say….a special occasion.

And I do expect to see more Wildcat from NU’s offense.

by MplsHusker on Oct 15, 2010 12:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn