Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

We Have Issues: Texas Longhorns Week 7

 

The morning of the game, I told my dad that I didn't have a good feel if Texas would win or not, but I told him Nebraska quarterback Taylor Martinez was going to have a long afternoon. I was wrong. He had a really short afternoon.

Martinez, who came into the game averaging almost 11 yards per carry, was shut down with 1.6 yards per carry and had just 63 yards passing. He was benched in the second half.

The Texas defense had its best performance since the Texas Tech game, holding Nebraska's offense to just 202 total yards and two field goals. Nebraska prepared a red-out, but they should have been prepared to get shutout - of the end zone, that is.

The offense had its best rushing game of the year, totaling 209 yards on the ground. The offense did what it needed to do to win. And although they didn't show much overall progress, I think we'll all agree that a win trumps individual progress any day. Plus, nothing develops a team and builds confidence like winning. And if that's true, Texas sure has developed a ton playing Nebraska over the last 15 seasons.

Garrett Gilbert's Progress 

Nebraska was not ready for Garrett Gilbert running. Neither were Texas fans. Let's get something out of the way right now: Although Gilbert was effective running, he pretty much made no significant progress. Not the kind we expect, anyway. Yes, he looked confident and he took on the responsibility very well, but he will make his mark at Texas with his arm. He wasn't going to have a good day passing against Nebraska anyway. They used Nebraska's terrific man coverage against them, and for that we've got to give a nod to the play calling. Clearly the bye week was used wisely.

He had 71 yards rushing and ran hard. He showed decent straight-ahead quickness. Through the air he completed just four passes for 62 yards. Again, not the kind of progress we need to see from him, but he was crucial in the win. That builds his confidence and leadership qualities, and those things may be more important than the ability to pinpoint a pass in the back of the end zone.

So, after I just contradicted myself with those two paragraphs, the quarterback grew into his role more with his performance against a really good Cornhusker defense. But his overall progress developing his skills was put on hold in favor of a gameplan that beat the No. 5 team in the country. And I'm perfectly fine with that.

Star-divide

Retooling the Running Game

OK, ok... so it was the best rushing performance of the season. Not bad. Although at the beginning of the season we thought we'd be examining the a single-back, under-center, downhill running attack. That idea has officially died. What we have is what we saw last season-a carousel of runners behind an offensive line that just doesn't get enough push. However, the line was much better against Nebraska, who walked a safety up to the line of scrimmage on most plays in the second half to stop the run.

Four players got at least 11 carries. Cody Johnson was the most productive runner without the initials "GG." He averaged 6.6 yards per carry and had a key first down late in the game that allowed Texas to run out the clock.  

Stop me if you've heard this one: Fozzy Whittaker showed some burst but was pretty ineffective overall.

Tre' Newton got some late carries that amounted to, well, not much. Looking at the big picture, this was the best the running game has been all year, but something tells me this thing is still a long way from being consistently effective. Is it too late to give Traylon Shead a shot? Malcolm Brown will be here next year, and we know he's going to get some playing time. So why not take the redshirt off Shead and see what he's got? Get that play-action pass going and take some pressure off Gilbert.

BROC (Big Receiver on Campus)

One catch by a wide receiver. That's 15 total catches by receivers the last two games, which were the biggest games on the schedule. Progress? I don't think so.

The quest to find a lead receiver is looking like it will continue into next season. James Kirkendoll has the most yards with 288, but has scored just one touchdown. Gilbert has shown a connection with freshman Mike Davis, which is encouraging for the future.

The Texas gameplan did not include much use for the receivers. They were better served spreading defenders and opening up room for runs. Again, if that means the progress to find a go-to receiver is halted for a win, so be it. But let's get the thing in the air against Iowa State.

Oh, wait... we didn't talk about Malcolm Williams. He is credited with the one catch, which is negated by a drop that would have been a touchdown. Yes, it wouldn't have been an easy catch, but he usually makes the tough ones and bumbles the easy ones.

The D-Line Shuffle

The defensive line had to switch gears from a pass-rushing, penetrating style to a more read-and-react approach. It worked. This is where bye weeks help tremendously.

The defense allowed just six points and 202 total yards, and it all started with the line. Sam Acho was terrific yet again. Eddie Jones had a huge play causing a fumble early. Alex Okafor even had a big sack for a 7-yard loss.

The key to assignment football is to keep the plays in front of you, and that's just what the D-line did. Switching from a pass-rush mentality more of a read mentality is very difficult to do. This group showed a lot of progress, and more important, proved that they are well-rounded.

Comment 59 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agreed

I’m incredibly happy that we got the win; yet at the same time, I realized that we really didn’t improve personnel-scheme wise. We wanted to see progress, but like you said, the win gives this team the intangible, “confidence”, and that will bolster progress much faster.

I look forward to see what we do for ISU gameplan-wise, and see if we have made that jump.

Eight Walls
<> a new MMA blog from Fantake

by kriess on Oct 18, 2010 2:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Question

If GG continues to struggle into the offseason, should Case be given a look?

What do we do if somehow Colt McCoy ends up on an NFL team starting against Vince Young?

by inVINCEable on Oct 18, 2010 2:16 PM CDT reply actions  

No Way

I think Gilbert is just fine. GD has been holding him back. I think he’s going to be a really good QB the next two years. Plus, he hasn’t gotten much help from the WRs or the running game. McCoy would have the same problems.

"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

by ElongatedHorn on Oct 18, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not directly disagreeing with YOU per se

but I think so. Gilbert just hasn’t really clicked in the passing game at all. He doesn’t look comfortable on the field and he hasn’t been consistent at all. Time will tell if he shapes up, I’m just positing that if he doesn’t by the end of the year, we might take a look at our backup.

What do we do if somehow Colt McCoy ends up on an NFL team starting against Vince Young?

by inVINCEable on Oct 18, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

This might have more to do with GD not being able to scheme around his talent

I found it interesting that the only way the offense could find “rhythm” is if GD had GG start running the ball more. Jesus, GD is so bad at his job…

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Oct 18, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hear ya

I think Gilbert looks more confident. But he has been inconsistant. I just think that’s more to do with the play calling and lack of a running game. He hasn’t been allowed to go down field enough. That’s his strength.

"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

by ElongatedHorn on Oct 18, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

No Way

The quarterback position has played the best so far this season. Which unit has outperformed GG on offense? Shipley is a bigger loss than McCoy in my opinion. We’re undefeated if he was granted a 7th year to be the go-to receiver and punt returner.

by Eskimohorn on Oct 18, 2010 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why so hard on Gilbert

I thought it was pretty clear that the problems with our offense were with the offensive line, until Saturday, and with the receivers. How many dropped passes have we seen? Gilbert hasn’t missed many throws. All but one of his interceptions were caused by tipped passes that should have been caught. He didn’t throw a single interception against one of the best secondaries in the NCAA. I don’t get this Gilbert’s-not-cutting-it thing. Go back and look at all of the passes that should have been caught by receivers and pressures/sacks that were on the O-line and adjust his stats accordingly. I think if you go through that exercise, you’ll come to a different conclusion.

by HookTech on Oct 18, 2010 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

"...holding him back"

I know that Greg Davis is a popular whipping boy, and I hate his bubble screens as much as anybody, but isn’t it remotely possible that GG’s short “dump-off” passes are a reflection of his own decision-making (e.g., lack of confidence and fear of throwing an INT) than a commandment from GG that he is not allowed to throw the ball down the field?

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Oct 18, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Completely Down on GG

I am not saying he may be a QB someday – but if you would have told me these would be his stats at the start of the season – I would have suggested that you see the guys in the white coats. Poor decisions, bad interceptions, no consistency. I was really expecting performances more like the 2nd half of Bama. Hope he works out, but right now I see more Chris Simms than Colt McCoy and I thought he would be a more dangerous passer than Colt. Little down on completion %, way up on deep strikes into the heart of the defense. I think this criticism is prolly too harsh due to inept WRs and an offense that looks like it doesn´t practice very much – so hopefully I am wrong.

Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"

by realmccoy on Oct 19, 2010 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too early...

Colt struggled against these guys last year. Colt struggled his first season as a QB. I think the combination of experience, GD loosening the rains a little bit, and hopefully (fingers crossed) the semblance of a run game next year will start to show significant progress. Way too soon to judge anything at this point. Give him at least a full year and the start of next before making that determination. Not to mention, his receivers are not helping anywhere nearly enough on a consistent basis. Of course, you can ask Nebraska about receivers not helping :)

by HornsFanInMA on Oct 18, 2010 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Colt struggled his 4th year as a QB

He had about 8 inconsistant games last year. Remember the flu? Or, the hang-nail excuse?

by Eskimohorn on Oct 18, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

He was good enough to win without running game or offensive line

so GD stopped focusing on those, because that was harder than just letting Colt do everything. It is why the offense is so shitty now.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Oct 18, 2010 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

No

The weak offensive line didn’t help him until Nebraska so the routes couldn’t develop (if they ever went more than 7 yards anyway), the receivers have been inconsistent (al la it’s week 8 and we don’t have a BROC), GD schemes were geared towards a pro style run game that never existed. Basically everything a young QB needs to help him along was not there. Let’s quell this “what about the other QB talk” now and let GG develop.

by PoolsideHorns on Oct 18, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Contrary to what most are saying....

I believe that he should be given a look. GG has flat out not been very good this year. I didnt expect him to be All Conference but I expected more than what he’s shown to date. I definitely believe he should be given all year to show what he’s got, but if he continues to struggle why not open it up? Not necessarily for Case, but the best option. GG, Case, CW whoever shows the most. This is the University of Texas why is it so absurd to open up a competition? He is not performing at a high level right nowt, hopefully it will change but if it f doesnt his job should be up for competition just like any other player who doesnt perform to standard. Just because he was heralded as the next big thing doesnt mean that he will be….see: C. Simms.

Vince Young = Greatness

by PineypointG on Oct 18, 2010 5:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Absurd.

GG is the best player on our offense.

by notsofst on Oct 18, 2010 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

[citation needed]

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Oct 18, 2010 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure

until then, you’re still just assuming he’s good, just like everybody else. I’m not going to rag on the kid, but I understand why there are now two distinct camps forming, the people who are still saying we have to let him grow up a little more, and those who think that a year of learning the system, and the national championship experience, and six games into his first season as the starter, he shouldn’t be playing as poorly as he is. I’m finding it harder to stay out of the latter camp, even though I’m not even considering giving up on him yet like some people apparently are.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Oct 19, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's not playing poorly

Have any examples of him playing “poorly”, other than…

“Oh he checks down too much”

or

“He hesitated in the pocket there when he should have busted out a huge run”

or

“He’s doing what the coaches are telling him, he should throw it in their face and improv his way to a national title!”

or

“He throws the ball too hard!!”

Give me a break… The kid is making a good if not great performance in an offensive crap-sandwich of a scheme. He’s got lead-handed receivers, no semblance of a running game, and an offensive line that’s questionable.

His interceptions have all been off tipped balls or in garbage hail-mary situations, or in one case, he underestimated how high a line backer could jump.

Blaming Gilbert and saying he should be benched is ignorant. This kid is a world-beater in the making, and if we’re choosing who to bench from offense, I’ll pick him dead last.

by notsofst on Oct 19, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Again, not saying he should be benched or anything like that

but he has thrown more picks than touchdowns, and his “best game” is a 4-16 outing where he did more with his feet, which is something that worked for that game, but we shouldn’t be hoping that that becomes the way GG is used. I certainly agree with you that a lot of his lack of production is due to scheme, lack of trust from coaches, etc., but to say that he hasn’t been a disappointment at this point is kind of lowering the expectations that we all had for him entering the season.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Oct 19, 2010 10:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

The second half of 'Bama was all Gilbert-Shipley

And there’s no more Shipley…

I don’t think Gilbert is getting much, if any, help downfield or elsewhere.

I do admit I had higher, probably too high, expectations for him coming into the year. But I honestly think he’s the strongest skill position player we’ve got right now.

The only other person who has shown flashes of ability has been Mike Davis, and he played one healthy game.

I don’t think GG is blowing the doors off the season, but I don’t think he’s a problem and I just see him struggling in his situation, not struggling as a player.

His 4/16 outing was
1. Against possibly the best pass defense in the country
2. Contained two dropped TD passes
3. Contained more than one “throwaway” pass to prevent a sack when there was good coverage downfield
4. Had no interceptions
5. Was in a game where we spent 75% of our gameplan protecting a lead

The guy threw 0 of his interceptions against a top-10 interception producing defense, and consistently had the ball in a big-play position when the opening was there. He’s done that day in and day out.

I agree that we don’t want to run him, but look at his runs. He picked up a huge first down with 3 yards after contact. He lowers his shoulders and makes it happen, when he hasn’t run the ball all year.

Hell, how many yards after contact do our RB’s pick up?

Most of my frustration with our offense is that Malcom/Kirk/Goodwin can’t get open, and when they are, they can’t catch the ball…. but GG always puts the ball there where they can make a play on it.

by notsofst on Oct 20, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I dont want to be talking about....

his potential mid way through his Junior year. His potential needs to be replaced with some level of production pretty soon.

Vince Young = Greatness

by PineypointG on Oct 19, 2010 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

beginning to wonder

is Gilbert really just another student? This kid isnt following the improvement curve at all——he looks like a dope right now—-hoping for better days—he needs to get his head out of his A@S!

by Bedias90 on Oct 23, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great win.

Now it’s time to see what Gilbert can do with his arm and help him grow there.

"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite

by Sunkist on Oct 18, 2010 2:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed

I think the offense did what it needed to win in a very hostile environment versus a top notch defense. Greatest thing the offense did on Saturday was that they did not turn it over. NU desperately needed to get a turnover to turn the momentum and try to get a defensive score but they couldn’t.

Although the 2nd half play calling was again conservative, this time i can understand the rationale a bit more since we were up by 14 and our D had their offense on lock down. I am proud that GD took some shots down the field in the first half however.

I think if GD had used this sort of play calling against OU, there is no doubt we would have beat the sooners. Especially attacking the middle of the field with passes to Fozzy and Tre were excellent calls that killed NU all day. This would have killed OU too if they were used.

by jtdiddy on Oct 18, 2010 2:29 PM CDT reply actions  

UT Receivers....

Are good for batting balls down on punt coverage! I sent this link to Mack Brown and requested he watch the 1:42 mark in this vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gf6avwX_J0

by Dawnpatrol on Oct 18, 2010 2:32 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't really understand the conservatism on GG

Sure, he checks down a lot, but I’m of the opinion that’s being coached to him.

The guy makes a lot of great throws. Too bad his receivers drop them.

Chiles and Davis getting banged up can’t be helping either, they have shown to be the best receiving options and both have been sidelined.

GG led Whittaker perfectly on his big play, and other than that was mostly subjected to trying to beat a good secondary.

Seriously, if our receivers had good hands, GG would have posted a stat line like 7-8/15 for 2 TD’s and no INTs against possibly the best pass defense in the county.

by notsofst on Oct 18, 2010 2:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Let's hold judgement this week

I think we should all just take this week to be happy with what we saw from our offense, and even happier about the defense. The passing game was not great, but if there was one aspect of the game in which Nebraska played extremely well, it was in the secondary’s coverage. Remember what McCoy’s passing stat line looked like? Yes, our receivers dropped some passes that should have been caught. Oh well. We got it done by showing a new wrinkle with Gilbert’s legs picking up yards and that was sweet to watch. The line played great, and now that we know it’s possible, we just need to hope there is some consistency through the rest of the schedule.

My proposal, we just enjoy this much needed win. Hold the judgement of our offensive sputters and look forward to seeing (hopefully) our offensive put on a show for the first time of the season against Iowa State and build from there. With the improved line play, receivers getting separation from a less stellar secondary, and a carry-over of the overall confidence of the players coming from this win, I think this Saturday will be a fun game to watch.

by HookTech on Oct 18, 2010 2:45 PM CDT reply actions  

The line play was what impressed me.

Probably the best performance I’ve seen out of the O-Line for a really long time. If they can keep that up, we’re going to be a different team moving forward.

by notsofst on Oct 18, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most definitely

That’s very encouraging, if not for getting a real power running game going this season, at least for looking forward to Malcolm Brown running through holes like we saw Saturday.

by HookTech on Oct 18, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

freudian slip?

When I wrote “offensive” where I meant to write “offense” in the second line of the second paragraph, I think I subconsciously made a hypocrite of myself.

by HookTech on Oct 18, 2010 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

We played well the entire game...

Did they drop a few passes for TD’s. Yes. Did we drop a few passes for TD’s…Yes. The difference was even when the Horns dropped passes we were able to make other plays to score. The Cornsuckers could not. I’m over that argument from them. It’s the same as saying…we had 1 lineman miss a block or Cody would have run in untouched (and we did a few times). We won. End of story!

by Dawnpatrol on Oct 18, 2010 2:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Listen

here. I especially like the part where they accuse us of faking injuries after they make first downs. LMAO.

by TXStampede on Oct 18, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow

That lady has a husky voice! I didn’t know Pelini’s wife was a chain smoker. She sure was emotional about the loss. She didn’t take it well, at all. I wonder how they were able to get her on this interview.

by HookTech on Oct 18, 2010 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

How do you get one o' them schmancy green posts anyway?

Gotta be an extry good one, I reckon. How’s this:

“If Texas would have beaten UCLA and ou instead of losing to them, we’d be higher in the polls.”

Whaddya think? Worthy? Damn I’m in a good mood this week!

41-38 !!

by JoeT63 on Oct 18, 2010 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Is that available for purchase?

Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"

by realmccoy on Oct 19, 2010 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Two vital improvements..

1) no turnovers (zero)
2) few penalties
these two things are what sank the boat vs UCLA and OU.
Very glad to see some disciplined play.

by HastaLaVista on Oct 18, 2010 3:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Gilbert running

Since Gilbert running was about the only thing that worked on offense, he’s getting a lot more credit than he deserves. I don’t see the instincts of VY or the footwork of McCoy. The running plays worked, but not because of any special moves on his part. He might be a good runner — the HS stats suggest that’s a possibility — but I haven’t seen any running skills worth building an offense around.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Oct 18, 2010 3:36 PM CDT reply actions  

His HS stats to suggest that are because:

Its easy to run when you are the Lake Travis QB who will always see 5-7 DB’s on every play. He makes one guy miss and then he’s untouched for 10 yards. Thats just the defense those teams are playing with. They’ll allow GG to run, if they dont allow the deep ball.

Eight Walls
<> a new MMA blog from Fantake

by kriess on Oct 18, 2010 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nobody's saying to build the offense around it

We know we need to be able to pass going forward, but Nebraska was not the right game to open it up passing-wise. Incidentally, that would be…Iowa State.

by GoHornsGo90 on Oct 18, 2010 9:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Must credit coaching staff

I agree with all your points…the coaching staff did a great job at recognizing our strengths and weaknesses and devising the appropriate gameplan….I am spoiled…I relish the days when our offense rolled out 50 points per game and there was little doubt regarding the outcome…wecolme to 2010 Texas Longhorns

by rcpcrcpc on Oct 18, 2010 5:27 PM CDT reply actions  

It was a great win....and GD let Gilbert run, with some great plays but....

Our receiving corp needs to improve dramatically and our O line needs to continue to play smart, but the coaches took the foot off the accelerator big time in the second half and this could have easily cost us the game.

How many passes did Nebraska drop that could have tied the game ? For us to get to the next level, we need some posession receivers and the coaching staff needs to play to win the whole game.

Can't get enough of that cowbell !!!

by MeatchickenHorn on Oct 18, 2010 5:49 PM CDT reply actions  

They would have

if they had needed too, but since NU never got back into it until the very end, they wanted to minimize the chances for turnovers etc. Not very fun for us to watch but I understand their decision. And ditto on the receivers.

by PoolsideHorns on Oct 19, 2010 7:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Glad we won and all, but it'll just mean further stagnation for the year

No real progress on the offense. We’ll win next week’s game with the same ludicrous example of “offense” and everyone will keep thinking everything’s fine. Or at least, Mack and company will keep saying everything’s fine, and their apologists on BON will point to the win and record. Meanwhile, the offense continues to suffer terribly while the defense does all the work. It’s the same as when the team won 3 games to start the year; no one would listen that we had issues because we were 3-0. Likewise post-Nebraska. People thinking is “solved” now because we won. Um, no, nothing was solved. We simply de-volved back into a sorta-spread offense. For the first half, anyway. It was the same-o, same-o in the second half.

Until this team finally shows improvement on offense, it’s not going to get any better.

In-VINCE-able.

by iamjackburton on Oct 18, 2010 8:15 PM CDT reply actions  

The Garrett Gilbert I saw against Nebraska...

…appeared to be having fun and seemed inspired. It was a great game plan and it worked, that’s what counts. WINNING builds confidence and it’s way too damn early to give up on GG.

Hello Texas, sure is good to see you again...

by DaytrippingLonghorn on Oct 18, 2010 8:21 PM CDT reply actions  

10-7-3-0

Texas scoring by quarter. I don’t think I’m being paranoid, but the first quarter of the Nebraska game is not going to carry us the rest of the year. Additionally, we got a few nice spots and calls from the officials.
I love the W, and I knew we had the talent, but we can still be so much better.

by Wrangler86 on Oct 18, 2010 9:52 PM CDT reply actions  

We've STILL got Issues

Did anyone notice on our game-opening drive that, when we faced third and ten at the NU ten, none of our receivers ran a pattern that took him any where near the end zone? Why throw the ball into heavy coverage inside the red zone if you’re not really trying to score a TD. Even if Mike Davis makes that catch at the five, he’s tackled immediately by three NU defenders. Ask Steve Spurrier about throwing into heavy coverage in the red zone when you’re in chip-shot field goal range. We still have issues with our so-called passing attack.

Having said that, GG threw two perfect TD passes which were both dropped.

Before we get to giddy over last weekend, let’s all remember our wide receivers dropped a pair of TD passes. NU’s receivers dropped at least five TD passes. We didn’t win that game so much as NU choked it away.

The biggest improvement I saw was our offense’s use of misdirection in our running attack and I don’t mean GG’s draws. A few of our runners took off straight ahead and then cut outside. Amazing! (Heavy sarcasm!)

Our defense gave away two first downs with stupid penalties on NU’s second half field goal drive. Some people don’t seem to want to learn (I mean you Aaron “Excessive Celebration” Williams!).

Our O line had its best game since last season’s A&M game, especially when you consider the quality of the opposing D line. Nonetheless, we’re still a very long way from being a solid football team. But there were signs last weekend that our coaches have been willing to make some adjustments. I just hope we don’t need two weeks in between every game from here on out to get ready to play a decent opponent. The trip to Manhattan still scares me.

by Hornucopia on Oct 18, 2010 11:49 PM CDT reply actions  

Our D took Nebraska out of its element...
Before we get to giddy over last weekend, let’s all remember our wide receivers dropped a pair of TD passes. NU’s receivers dropped at least five TD passes. We didn’t win that game so much as NU choked it away.

Our D took Nebraska out of its element. That’s exactly what it needed to do. Neb. wasn’t going to win by passing the ball. Yes, they dropped some TD passes, but that was the whole idea – shut down Martinez and the run and make Neb. pass the ball to win. They scored 2 field goals against the Texas D. Even if they would have scored one TD, it still would have been a terrific defensive performance by Texas.

"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

by ElongatedHorn on Oct 19, 2010 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

sweet offensive game plan and play calling

how about that Greg Davis, huh?

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Oct 19, 2010 4:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn