Miles Onyegbule Another Big Receiver for Texas
Instant analysis -- Much like the three players who committed on the evening of the first Junior Day, the first commitment on the Saturday morning day of the Junior Day proper, there was little suspense surrounding the talented pass-catcher's decision -- it had been crystal clear for some time that if Onyegbule received an offer, he would commit on the spot. As far back as last June, Onyegbule had the Longhorns atop his list ($) and never wavered from that stance over the following eight months until his commitment. Afterwards, Oneygbule let it be known that he has been a Texas fan his entire life ($) and often discussed playing for the Longhorns with his brothers growing up.
Clearly a personal favorite of Bobby Kennedy and Bruce Chambers, who recruit the Metroplex for the Longhorns, Oneygbule received one of what will likely only be two receiver spots in the class, along with Jaxon Shipley. Before the Junior Day, news broke that Trey Metoyer, arguably the top receiver in the state, and Texas were heading in separate directions, no major surprise because Metoyer grew up an Oklahoma fan and the Longhorns appeared to have significant ground to make up throughout the process.
What isn't clear is whether the coaching staff chose Oneygbule because it was going to be easier to recruit him or if in their evaluations they simply rated the Arlington receiver higher. After viewing the film on both, Metoyer appears to be a better playmaker than Onyegbule and may possess slightly better speed, but isn't exactly a burner himself. Since taking Onyegbule meant that the staff did not seriously pursue Metoyer, it's safe to say that the two will be linked for some time and if Metoyer turns out to be significantly more productive in college, there will be plenty of second-guessing about taking Oneygbule without a major run at Metoyer.
At this point, it's probably only worth saying that the two talented pass-catchers will write that narrative themselves in the near future.
Instant scouting report -- Texas wide receivers coach Bobby Kennedy has long had an infatuation with big receivers. The value of big receivers is obvious -- they are more effective blocking downfield in the wide receiver screen game and running game, they are better vertical threats because of their size and (usually) their ability to high point the football against smaller defeners, and they can use their body to become effective possession receivers because it's simply harder for smaller defensive backs to get around them.
Onyegbule fits all of those categories and his average of 12 yards per catch indicates that he was indeed a possession receiver last season for quarterback Matt Joeckel, a 2009 A&M commit, and seemed to raise some warning signs for some, but a look at Onyegbule's film ($) gives perspective on why Oneygbule wasn't more of a big-play threat. Like the Longhorns, Arlington throws a lot of short hitches, most likely a sight adjustment between quarterback and receiver based on how far the cornerback is playing off the ball. In and off itself, the fact that opposing teams often were not willing to press Onyegbule indicates some concern for his ability to make plays down the field.
Arlington also used Onyegbule extensively on slip screens, a type of screen normally reserved for smaller, quicker players. It may have partly been out of necessity, with no better candidates for those plays, but Oneygbule consistently demonstrated one of his top attributes on those plays -- some shake in his hips and his ability to make defenders miss in space. In fact, it probably reminded Kennedy, who recruits the Dallas area and was therefore probably the first Texas coach to see Onyegbule play, of 2009 commit John Harris, another big-bodied receiver who excelled as a junior in turning short passes into longer gains.
Many of Onyegbule's touchdowns seem to have come on shorter throws in the red zone, where the big receiver could use his body on screens, fades, and other throws utilizing his height advantage -- he should continue to be a red-zone threat at the next level. Those plays indicate on willingness on his part to catch the ball in traffic and over the middle without concerns about being hit.
Overall, Oneygbule has adequate straight-line speed, good balance, above-average feet and shake in his hips, but most of all he knows how to use his big body to use advantage and how to adjust to ball in the air, as Joeckel would often intentionally underthrow the ball. Another major positive is that Onyegbule has large, sure hands. An article from the OU Rivals site last summer compared him to a young Malcolm Kelly ($).
At 6-4, 200 pounds, Onyegbule already has a big frame and could easily reach 220-230 pounds at Texas. Though he has said that the coaches see him as a split end and not a flex tight end, he could play inside if Texas keeps the twins look debuted in the national championship and has said himself that even he's not sure how much weight his frame could add. His older brother, Maxwell, played defensive end at Kansas and showed up to campus at a similar weight has his younger brother currently carries around, though it's hard to say without being able to compare pictures from the same time frame if Miles has the frame to add 40 pounds, as his older brother did at Kansas. At this point, with the Texas coaches projecting him as a split end, working on his speed will be more important than adding bulk, as Oneygbule probably runs in the low 4.6 range at this point.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Enjoyable, Big Roy
Questions:
Will you have a list of the second Junior Day invites, and what would you guess as to the number of offers forthcoming this weekend?
How many offers were made during the first Junior Day weekend (not counting the 13 players who accepted)?
Yup
Second Junior Day list forthcoming.
I believe there were 10 other offers — Brown, Green, Westerman, Flowers, Anderson, Russell, Edmond, Wallace, Reed, Rasco. Off the top of my head, I might have missed one.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 22, 2010 4:03 PM CST up reply actions
Awesome
It’s good to see a fellow Arlington Colt come on board. Not sure we have had one since the great Ricky Brown. Who convinced me to quit playing linebacker in Jr. High practice. It was miserable meeting that guy in the hole. Hopefully Onyegbule can have similar success down in Austin.
"big-time players make big-time plays in big games."
Oh man, Ricky Brown!
That guy was a killer fullback. I loved watching him clear the way for RW. Simply vicious!
I have beat wholesale ass for a whole lot less.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 22, 2010 1:57 PM CST up reply actions
Strong Texas Leans
A lot has been made lately on this board of the staff offering kids that they though would be sure to commit, and whether or not the motivation for this strategy is based on laziness by our recruiters. In my opinion, and based on what I have read of Mack’s recruiting philosophy this seems to be a poor assessment.
The way I understand it, Mack and the staff made a concious decision a few years back that they would prefer to have kids that WANTED to be Longhorns than those who had to be convinced, because it showed in their performance on the field as well as their behavior off the field. We may be missing out on a few high profile prospects with this strategy, but the staff thinks that we will get more out of the kids that we take. I for one agree completely 100% with this plan, as long as it is executed properly.
I don’t see the correlation between wanting to go to a school your whole life, and staying out of trouble while at said school if you were “convinced” to go. Every player has to buy into the program, the culture, the system or else they’ll likely never be a very productive player. It’s the coaching staff’s job to make that happen. The opinion that “players close to their family stay out of trouble more often than those that are away from their family (oos recruits)” doesn’t really hold water when we see Longhorns getting in trouble off the field who are mostly Texas kids.
by Displaced Longhorn on Feb 22, 2010 11:27 AM CST up reply actions
to be fair...
Most of the roster is Texas kids. Houston got a DUI. I think that means like 20% (completely made that up but could be close to accurate) of our OOS scholarship guys from last year’s roster have had off the field issues.
right, and since recruiting Texas kids means that they’re flawless and never going to get into trouble… we should be having grade issues, or dwi issues, or resisting arrest issues… except we are. because when you get 100 kids together, a certain % will get in trouble, a certain % will get caught in trouble. just because momma is 200 miles away instead of 2000 doesn’t mean anything. Weeding out the trouble makers starts in the recruitment process, not in narrowing your search to your home state thinking those kids will give more effort than an OOS kid.
I 100% agree in the idea that Mack should cherry pick Texas and build a great relationship with Texas coaches, but at the same time 10% of the class should be cherry picking the nation for high quality (in skill and character) kids who will buy into the Texas mentality.
by Displaced Longhorn on Feb 22, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't read the issue so much as an OOS thing...
as it was a “prima donna” thing. I thought Mack was talking about his personal shift between trying to get the best athletes/recruiting classes…which involves pursuing kids who may require more hand holding and preferential treatment…vs. the type of kids who “want it” more and are more apt to fight through adversity. Could be wrong.
straw man construction underway
I have beat wholesale ass for a whole lot less.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 22, 2010 1:58 PM CST up reply actions
I don't see anything that indicates early or late commitments
are an indicator of future problems — or successes.
Davis and Buckner, two of those who just left the program under clouds, were very early commitments to, respectively, the 2009 and 2008 classes. Andre Jones was an early ’07 commit, and he even enrolled early — and never got into a game . . . . McCoy committed early . . . Snead commited late, and bailed after one season. . . . Sherrod Harris committed early and is staying five years . . . GJ Kinne committed late, and then left.
I agree with Mack’s concept in one regard: Somebody who really wants to be a Longhorn is going to be more willing to follow along, accept backup status for 2-3 seasons if that’s necessary, than somebody who had to be hard-sold on signing.
do we want players who come in expecting to be 3 year backups.. or do we want people who challenge for playing time immediately?
by Displaced Longhorn on Feb 22, 2010 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
Both
We need a little bit of everything to be a successful program, but the realilty for 80% of the recruits is that they will have to ride the pine for at least 2 years. The ones that really want to be a part of the program are more likely to stay straight, work hard, go to class, etc. until their number is called. And when they are on the field, they’ll play with a little extra pride and motivation that not many other schools can match. With so many kids dreaming of playing for Texas, why should we take kids that might not fall into that category. And this has nothing do with in/out of state or early/late commitment arguments. From what I have read, I think Jordan Hicks falls into this category.
i think the point is
if texas is the your number one school and you want to play here
you would work harder for the school than someone who is not quite so attached to the school
Pronunciation
How do you say his name?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I think it's "oh-nay-BOO-lay"
I have beat wholesale ass for a whole lot less.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 22, 2010 2:00 PM CST up reply actions
not going to claim to know this for sure...
but I’ve heard it said “on-yuh-boo-lay” on podcasts…
My mistake
It looks like the OP misspelled his name, because it’s actually “Onyegbule” (the “y” goes before the “e”), and I had based my guess on the spelling in the OP. I’m not all that experienced in any non-Maghrebi African pronunciation systems, but in what experience I do have, it looks like your pronunciation would be correct for the right spelling. And as a Nigerian friend of mine explained to me one time, there’s usually not an emphatic syllable in Nigerian names (sounds a little robotic, actually). As such, without using true phonetic symbols (which I have no idea how to create on this particular computer), I think “ōn-yeh-boo-lay” is probably as close as I could guess.
I have beat wholesale ass for a whole lot less.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 22, 2010 3:24 PM CST up reply actions
Your pronunciation looks correct there, apologies for the misspelling in the title.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 22, 2010 4:07 PM CST up reply actions
Yikes
Major misspelling in the original title. Onyegbule.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Feb 22, 2010 4:06 PM CST up reply actions
Nah, not so major
Just two letters reversed. I’m sure it’s not the first time it’s happened to him. In fact, I searched his last name, and I found both spellings used for his brother.
I have beat wholesale ass for a whole lot less.
by burntorangehorn on Feb 22, 2010 11:42 PM CST up reply actions

by 
































