It's The Seniors, Stupid
When Balbay was lost for the year, I took a stab at ranking the most important players on the team from that point forward. Atop my list? Damion James.
Now, I'm not above self-congratulatory look-sees (and in this case my position was not universally accepted), but please, hold your applause. I actually re-raise this issue not to remind you that I was on to something, but to explore how we've all perhaps been wrong.
While it's easy to see that my take on James was on point, you need only read on to #2 on my list (Avery Bradley) to begin finding evidence of where I was wrong. And you'll find much more, if you continue to the players ranked #3 (Hamilton) and #4 (Brown). Not that these freshmen aren't critical or that I won't stand by what I wanted from them in the original post, but in retrospect, the reasons I was right to rank Damion James #1 atop the list are the same reasons I was wrong to rank Bradley, Hamilton, and Brown above Gary Johnson (#5) and Dexter Pittman (#6).
Maybe the best way to think about what I'm getting at is to consider what Gary Johnson now means to this team, relative to where he was as a basketball player (and contributor) a year ago. Entering his true junior season, I'll be honest: I was pretty down on Johnson. I really was. Between his shot selection and poor team play, all I could focus on was what, in two years, he had proven unable to do. Fast forward to today and Johnson is, I would argue, the second-most important player on the team. He's neither the second-most talented, nor the second-best NBA prospect, but he's the second-most important to this team being the best it can be.
And yet, heretofore this season the focus has been on what the trio of freshmen have not become; and though I will stand by my thought that Rick Barnes has not handled this season particularly well, I'm starting to think that amongst those of us who care, we've been as flawed in our expectations as we believe Barnes has been in his coaching this year. To get to the point of the matter: I suspect that we've expected too much of these freshmen, too soon.
As much as we've focused on the myriad successes and failures of Bradley, Hamilton, and Brown, I've yet to see a single word of praise for Barnes for Gary Johnson's development. The focus continues to remain on the freshmen, and though I'm as guilty of it as anyone else, I'm arriving at the point where I'm starting to see this very differently.
Think about T.J. Ford as a freshman. Or if you're like me, the frustration you felt when Bill Simmons basically blasted Rick Barnes for not winning a title during Kevin Durant's freshman year. Or if you follow the NBA, think about the difference between Durant as a rookie and where he is now. Think, again, of where most of us thought Gary Johnson was in November of this year and where he is now. Almost without exception, these things -- these players -- take time.
I think the mistake that we've made this year is in our expectations with regard to this year's freshman class. And really, I think that's been the mistake that Rick Barnes has made, as well. We'll see what's ahead for this team, but if they fail to meet everyone's lofty expectations, I'm beginning to think that the problem won't so much have been that Rick Barnes failed to turn these freshmen into superstars, but that he -- like the rest of us -- failed to understand what they could and could not be for us.
I have no idea whether, at this point, this kind of realization can be a useful teaching point for this year's team. What I do know is that, if we fall short of meeting our goals, when this is all over and we sit down to evaluate both Barnes and ourselves this year, I think we'll find that we were all off base a bit.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Gary
Next year Johnson won’t be playing in the shadow of Damion James. The two have never really been complementary, though some of our best lineups have had them both. But next year, Gary will get more attention from the defense and he will be paired with freshman Tristan Thompson. He’ll be the senior leader.
BTW: have you noticed the jump in Gary’s play happened at the time we got the new uniforms? Was the t-shirt holding him back?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I noticed the whole team play went down...
after the new uniforms except for GJ….. But, I would still rank Mason right up there with key players…… assist to turnover ratio… leadership… He may not be the best player on the court, but I guarantee he works harder than the others. He is a solid presence… great role model for these youngsters who are coming up.
YES I'm a girl! YES I watch Sports! YES I drink beer! If you don't like it, you can kiss my girly, sports watching, beer drinking ASS! ♥ my Longhorns..
by LadyLonghorninOK on Mar 11, 2010 7:48 AM CST reply actions
Truth Shall Set You Free
I agree with the point, and I have felt all year that the whole handling of Hamilton, Balbay, Mason, Bradley has been a cover up for the most embarassing aspect of this season collapse. How in the world did Pittman regress from a beast that could not be contained by top flight programs in the country to an inconsistent third rate player???
Agree on Pittman to an extent...
…that he needed more of an offensive game. The Big 12 teams caught onto his two or three moves excluding dunks; he’s still a year or two away in terms of conditioning and offense. But to be fair he didn’t get any shooting help from the perimeter guys hence the double and triple teams.
The biggest failure in my mind was at point guard. We have plenty of NBA talent except at point guard-the one spot where it’s required for us. Imagine if we’d had a TJ Ford dishing out crisp passes this year. Pittman might have been All-Big 12.
"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Mar 11, 2010 10:49 AM CST up reply actions
Excellent (self) evaluation PB
…but aren’t the freshmen pretty much soph’s by now? They do have 30+ games under their belt. Until last night night, it seems that most of Johnson’s points and rebounds have come via hustle and effort as opposed to team play designed to free him up or center on his skills. I see him as the ultimate trash player ala PJ Tucker.
James and Johnson
have been impressive all season for their confidence and intensity. Nice to see Pittman rejoining them last night. These three (plus Mason and Hill) have a winning attitude that I pray is infectious.
Johnson
I have ALWAYS loved Johnson. He has played very well over the last few weeks. His effort all over the court is seems to be rubbing off!! Lets hope this is the start of something good.
J'Covan
It’s good to see Johnson stepping up lately and playing like we had anticipated when he first came. Right now, I see sloppy ball handling (see: passing) as the biggest hurdle for the team. If we overcome this and get consistent play from Pittman and Hamilton, we are in.
J’Covan question: Has anyone else noticed the previous two games when J’Covan had the ball at point (last possesion in the first half of Baylor and I forget when last night at Iowa) while winding down the clock? He dribbled for a while until the time ran down, then took contested three point shots in each situation. Granted, he was fouled on the Baylor possession, with no foul call made. These couldn’t have been designed plays, right? Is this the epitome of Barnes’ angst with him?
Not sure about the first half
But in other situations this season, it has been to draw the foul on Brown with his 91% FT. Didn’t happen last night though.
by Infield Elephant on Mar 11, 2010 10:32 AM CST up reply actions
I can admit that I was not sold on Gary
until about three or four weeks ago. Up to that point, I saw (incorrectly vs stats) missed boards and sloppy handling. He seemed very uncomfortable to me. But at some point in this free fall, he seems to have made a decision (along with James) that he won’t just sit and watch this crumble. I now have the utmost respect for his effort, confidence and leadership on the court.
I agree that our expectations were too great for these freshman, as they were with Barnes. Again, while some blame has to be on coach, I feel for the guy having to deal with a group of young guys which he has seemingly lost control of. I’m not at practice, but by the demeanor of Barnes with his guys, I see this: J’Covan – “quit your bitchin’ or I will sit your ass down all season”; Hamilton – “Jordan, let’s try shooting blindfolded on a pogo-stick. Jordan, are you even listening to me?”
Anyhow, I don’t want to close this book and look ahead yet, but who’s actually going pro and who can hang around another year? I realize this is unlikely, but just imagine if Bradley, Hamilton and Brown all returned to mature/develop playing alongside a better Balbay, Ward (healthy) & Johnson.
by Infield Elephant on Mar 11, 2010 10:53 AM CST reply actions
Next year
Johnson will not have it easy next year. James and Pittman have been drawing the best inside defenders, leaving Gary on smaller men. What happens when he draws the best inside defender and opposing coaches scheme against him? He has no patented inside move and already gets a lot of shots blocked. He also has bad hands and can’t pass.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
No,
we’re supposed to be praising Gary here, you see?
by Infield Elephant on Mar 11, 2010 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
Great post...
Really good points about the constant focus on the freshmen, at the expense of the other players on the roster…
But, then again, besides Johnson, what other players’ development has been overlooked? Ward/Balbay got hurt, Lucas sucks, and we dont really need to talk about Chappy/Wangmene/Hill. Just a weird season, all the way around.
Yeah, I think it's a fair point
to say that the positive development of Gary should be rightfully overlooked by the underachieving freshmen, along with the backup bigs, Lucas, and Mason. Remember when we thought Mason was the next Royal Ivey? For Balbay, he entered the program as a terrible shooter, and will leave the program as a terrible shooter.
There are plenty of recruiting busts on this team, and if I’m another Big XII coach recruiting players, I’m pointing this out. How many busts are on KU, A&M, and Baylor for example?
by goingforthecorner on Mar 11, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions
While I agree about the general sentiment of your argument
I don’t really agree that UT is the only school with busts. That happens a lot of places. Plus you have to factor in level of talent. After Baylor fell off due to the shooting, they haven’t really been recruiting high level players. They have started to now, but the last decade or so have been about finding diamond in the rough types for them, therefore it’s impossible to be a bust when people don’t expect a lot.
I still think every school has players underperform (and there is still time for UT’s to figure it out in years to come). Highly touted DeAndre Jordan was average at best at A&M.
Kansas had C.J Giles, Elijah Johnson (5 star that hasn’t even played this year.) David Padgett and Rodrick Stewart were 5 star eh’s.
I bet if we looked up past teams that were good enough to consistently recruit top talent, you will find just as many busts as you do successful hits.
No I agree txtwstr
The only point I think we’ve been a little bit off on is focusing on how Hamilton, Bradley, and Brown need to carry us. In truth, we need Johnson, James, and Pittman to carry us.
As I said in the post, I still don’t think Rick Barnes has handled this season especially well, but be that as it may, the key to us being our best are the upperclassmen, not the freshmen.
You ain't hurt...
If we need our frontcourt to carry us
we’re not going to get very far in the tournament. It’s all about guard play (which is why I chose Brown as the #1 most important player). We can beat the Iowa States and MAYBE advance to the Sweet 16 with the right matchups. But our current guard play is eventually going to kill us, no matter how good our big men are.
by goingforthecorner on Mar 11, 2010 3:16 PM CST up reply actions
Does Barnes Fail to Develop Players?
IMO, YES! In addition to the players mentioned above, there are several notables that come to mind that never really improved since they first entered the Texas program. Brad Buckman showed a world of potential as a freshman but by the time he was thru he had become a mediocre player.
James Thomas was better as a junior and soph than a senior who somehow had entered Barnes’s doghouse in favor of Jason Klotz. I never understood that move as Thomas always gave 100%. We don’t have to look back but 2 years to see the terrible senior season that Atchley had. Unfortunately this is a pretty long list and that doesn’t speak well of Barnes and his coaching staff. GREAT recruiters, yes – but developers of talent, this is debatable. Klack and Vazquez never really their potential and PJ Tucker left after a sub-par year. None of the above-mentioned players made it in the NBA.
Chapman, Hill, Hamilton, Brown, Mason, Balbay and Wangmene all seem to be following this path (although it is still way too early to draw conclusions on Hamilton and Brown – but Brown has fallen off the map and Hamilton is so up and down that he’s really a mystery at this stage)
This is incoherent
With all due respect, this is an incoherent argument.
You mention James Thomas developing into a force as a sophomore and junior, to make the point that Rick Barnes doesn’t develop talent. That doesn’t work.
First of all, that Thomas regressed as a senior doesn’t change the fact that he progressed up through his junior year. Second of all, the main reasons Thomas struggled as a senior was because (1) he was battling an ankle injury throughout the year, and (2) he no longer had TJ Ford.
Chapman and Hill were recruiting problems, not development problems.
Balbay developed just fine.
Wangmene is coming back from an injury.
Hamilton has improved dramatically over the course of the year.
Barnes has plenty of weaknesses, but I wouldn’t say that “failing to develop talent” is one of the big ones.
You ain't hurt...
The real question is: WIll J'Covan Brown transfer?
Possibly
"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"
by greenspointexas on Mar 11, 2010 4:04 PM CST reply actions
My Bad P.B.
well taken comments – my explanation was poorly framed. What I should have said was this: I assume that pretty much all players have a normal growth and development curve that takes them down the road to developing their skill set as a ball player. I personally think the to the degree to which Thomas (and some others, not all) improved was due to more natural development via playing and practicing and not so much as a result of Barnes’s tutelege.
Fair enough
And hey, there’s plenty of room for disagreement on Barnes’ strengths and weaknesses. It may be a while before we fully understand everything that went wrong this year. Like txtwstr said, it’s been a bizarre year.
You ain't hurt...

by 





























