Texas Basketball Report 3.6: March Madness Arrives
The high degree of our frustration the past two months has been rooted in the high aspirations we had for this team in the post-season. So it was perhaps fitting that one of Texas' most encouraging performances of 2010 came on the first day of the calendar's turn to March. Do-or-die time is upon us, so let's set the stage with a Q&A on the team's situation heading in.
Q: What are the big takeaways from Monday night's win over Oklahoma?
The most important one was that Texas won, which would be too obvious to state but for the implications of a loss. Think about it for a second. Imagine that Texas lost, at home, on senior night, to a young, mediocre Oklahoma team lacking a single quality player beyond their top four. Texas would have dropped to 8-7 in conference play, needing to beat Baylor or hope for an OSU loss to Nebraska to avoid finishing in 7th place in the conference. Though with a weak bubble this year, an 8-8 Texas team likely gets in to the NCAAs, we're suddenly a bubble team, and first-round loss in the Big XII Championship from a very nerve-wracking Selection Sunday.
Meanwhile Rick Barnes, entering the game in the doghouse for the team's recent struggles, exits the game on... the hot seat? It's hard to fathom (and virtually impossible to imagine him being on the actual hot seat with Deloss Dodds), but there's no question that between Monday night and Saturday's tip with Baylor, the bulk of the commentary among Texas fans would have been about their loss of faith in Rick Barnes.
So, yeah. Beating OU isn't anything to go wild about, but given how many fans have been talking about Barnes of late, losing to OU would have been.
Looking beyond that, the biggest takeaway is probably that we're starting to see the kind of guard play from Brown and Hamilton that we desperately need to get the most out of our front court strengths. Both players stretch the defense with their range, and both can break it down with their ability to head to the rim on the bounce. Both are excellent passers. And when defenses have to actively deal with two guards like that, that's defensive capital that can't be spent smothering James and Pittman. Suddenly, we're not so easy to defend.
The second big takeaway is that as Avery Bradley has begun to fade -- appearing to hitting a bit of a wall as the season wears on -- Gary Johnson has come on strong. With Hamilton steadying into a dynamic, consistent player and J'Covan Brown appearing to re-emerge as a primary guard, we're a legitimate six-man team, with three others (Mason, Lucas, and Lexi) who can steal a couple few minutes for you in the right situations, as needed. At its best, that's a squad no one wants in their Regional.
Q: What's at stake in the Big XII standings with Saturday's contest against Baylor?
Wiggo already walked us through the Projected Standings, but as of Tuesday, the conference standings look like this:
| Rank | Team | Record | Remaining |
| 1 | Kansas | 13-1 | Kansas St, @ Missouri |
| 2 | Kansas St. | 11-3 | @ Kansas, Iowa St |
| 3 | Baylor | 9-5 | @ Tech, Texas |
| 4 | Missouri | 9-5 | @ Iowa St, Kansas |
| 5 | Texas A&M | 9-5 | Oklahoma St, @ OU |
| 6 | Texas | 9-6 | @ Baylor |
| 7 | Oklahoma St. | 8-6 | @ A&M, Nebraska |
Wiggo's tier-based Projected Standings give a slight edge to Missouri for the fourth seed in the Big XII Championship, but the Aggies stole the head-to-head match up with a huge win in Columbia, so A&M controls its destiny for a first-round bye. But what happens if Texas beats Baylor, finishing both the 'Horns and Bears at 10-6 on the year? Is there any way for Texas to earn a bye in the Conference Championship?
- Most obviously, but least likely, both Missouri and Baylor, or Missouri and Texas A&M, could lose both of their final two contests.
- If Texas A&M loses both its contests and Missouri wins one of two, the Tigers, Horns, and Bears would be tied at 10-6. The Big XII's tie-breaking rules call for the tie to be broken among teams within the same division first, pitting Texas and Baylor against one another. Since the two teams would have split head-to-head, the tie-break turns to record in South Division games, but both would be 7-3, sending us to the next step: a comparison of records against the top teams in the South, sequentially based on the standings. Both squads went 1-1 against A&M, so we would move down to Oklahoma State and... voila! Winner-winner! Texas' 2-0 record against the Pokes breaks the tie.
- If both A&M and Missouri lose one of their final two, we'd have a four-way tie at 10-6*, and luckily for Missouri, the tie would again be broken among the Division teams first. Here, the Big XII's published tie-breaking rules get a little messy: "When three or more teams from the same division are tied step B (head-to-head results) will consist of a mini-round robin among the tied teams." Since all three squads would be 1-1 against each other, we'd move to Step C, which again would be intra-division record. In this scenario, A&M's loss to either OSU or OU this week would be their fourth South Division loss of the year, eliminating them from the tiebreaker. We're down to Texas and Baylor again, and again we win on Step D.
*Should A&M's loss come to Oklahoma State, we could have a five-way tie if the Pokes beat Nebraska, but OSU would be eliminated in the first-step, for losing twice to Texas.
Amazingly enough, with a win over Baylor, Texas just needs Oklahoma State to beat A&M in Reed Arena to finish as the fourth seed and earn a first-round bye in the Big XII Championship. I suppose that it doesn't matter all that much, but you can be sure it would really chap Aggie's hide, which is nice.
Assuming Texas loses to Baylor, they'll play an opening round game, like against Iowa State.
Q: What kind of NCAA seed is Texas looking at?
I suppose we should start with the best and worst case scenarios and then explore what's in between:
Worst case scenario: Texas loses to Baylor and to Iowa State in the first round of the Big XII Tourney, to finish at 23-9 (9-8). The perception of our team would be decidedly "trending down," with a 6-9 finish to the season and two bad losses on the resume (at OU and Iowa State in the Big XII tourney). In all likelihood, Texas finds itself on the 9 or 10 line, and possibly 11, depending on how many at-large locks win conference tournaments.
Best case scenario: Texas runs the table, winning the Big XII Championship, to finish at 27-7 (13-6) or 28-7 (14-6), with a smattering of good-to-great wins down the stretch (at Baylor, and three quality teams in the Big XII tourney). Texas probably plays its way up to the 3 line.
There probably aren't many teams with that wide a range, but it's been that kind of a year for Texas. If we're looking for a goal, it should probably be to play our way to a 5 or 6 seed, which it could do a couple of ways. A road win at Baylor would give Texas breathing room in the Big XII Championship, where it could win one or two games and have a realistic shot at a 5 or 6. A loss to Baylor puts pressure on Texas to at least reach the semifinals, and ideally, the Big XII Championship Game.
0 recs |
25 comments
|
Comments
Both squads went 1-1 against A&M, so we would move down to Oklahoma State and… voila! Winner-winner! Texas’ 2-0 record against the Pokes breaks the tie.
We’re down to Texas and Baylor again, and again we win on Step D.
Nice to see Big XII tie breakers tip in our favor this time around, albeit on a slightly lower payscale than last time.
Good stuff
Thanks PB. Not much else to do but wait and see. I’ll be watching the Bears @ Tech tonight. Tix $1, not bad for a decent scouting report.
by Infield Elephant on Mar 2, 2010 2:21 PM CST reply actions
In some sense, do we want a first round bye?
It obviously helps to win the whole Big 12 tourney, but this is a team that has a lot to prove, and maybe the extra game is a good thing. Assuming we win it, of course.
by TheElusiveShadow on Mar 2, 2010 2:23 PM CST reply actions
Problem with that is that a win against ISU gets us virtually nothing except tired.
I mean, it helps with our record over the last ten games, but it’s ISU. We’re not going to move up any spots in the NCAA bracket by winning that game, and it could potentially tire us out and make us less likely to win 1 or 2 more games against good teams (wins over which would move us up in the NCAA bracket). Of course, there’s a presumed psychological boost that comes with winning, but that’s not quantifiable, so I’d say that it makes more sense to want the bye.
This is of course all moot because it’ll never happen, but whatever.
Good points
I think I’m just anxious (deluded?) to want to see as much improvement as possible before the NCAA tournament. In all likelihood, of course, we’re playing this game anyway.
by TheElusiveShadow on Mar 2, 2010 6:45 PM CST up reply actions
PB
I assume that as you have so much time to write during your 3L spring term that you must have secured employment…if so, congrats. Even coming from ND, this is a tough market.
I'm taking 19 hours this semester
So it’s more like I’m not sleeping all that much, but I do have a job lined up, which eases the pressure considerably. Couldn’t be more excited to move back home.
Thanks for the kind words…
You ain't hurt...
Welcome home!
So what kind of practice are you going into, if that’s not being too nosey? Might send some business your way.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Shoot me an email
If you’d like to talk shop, shoot me an email at burntorangenation-at-[gmail]. Don’t want to clutter up this thread with too much outside business chatter.
You ain't hurt...
I am really looking forward to Saturday
I feel like I have been saying that the last few weeks but this time I think its for real.
I think Barnes found something with the Lineup of…
1- Brown
2- Hamilton
3- James
4- Johnson
5- Pittmann
Not exactly sure how tall Hamilton is, but I think he is listed at 6-7. That gives us 4 players above 6-7 and a PG at 6-2. There is a mismatch in there some where, and I feel like its mostly with James or Johnson. James is a mismatch all by himself with his athletic ability. But when the opposing teams big man is on Dex, who ever is guarding Johnson is in some real trouble. And I think we saw that last night when Crocker was on Johnson and he is just not physical enough to match up with him.
I feel like we are going to be able to handle the Baylor zone with Brown and Hamilton on the outside forcing Baylor to extend the zone a little further then needed, freeing up James and Johnson short corner, high post (for a little High low action with Dex) and driving lanes for everyone.
In all honesty though would rather have a 6 seed than 5 seed, that would allow us to stay away from Kansas as long as possible and give us another shot against K-state.
"The best decision I ever made was coming to Texas," James said. "The second-best decision was coming back."
I like the 8th seed
You get a warmup game against a decent opponent, then you catch the #1 seed cold.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
That's a good-lookin' lineup that has produced lately . . .
and I know their recent inconsistencies have been atrocious but if Avery Bradley is your 6th man, you’re a very talented team. Let’s hope they can put it all together when it matters most. They’ve lost 3 or 4 games strictly on terrible free-throw shooting down the stretch. If they continue to shoot ‘em like they did against the suckin’ sooners last night, march madness may turn into a burnt orange party.
I Hope For A 4
but don’t expect it.
we just have to beat Baylor and hope for the best.
If we can keep hitting our free throws we can hang.
Stating the obvious
and pilling on.
You mean the tiebreaker is not decided by popular opinion? We are going to rely on performance rather than perception to settle the matter?
I guess basketball coaches are smarter than football coaches.
This system is far superior on many levels.
by Infield Elephant on Mar 2, 2010 5:08 PM CST up reply actions
And conference seeding is based on conference records
Imagine that
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I'm more of a football girl, but....
What is wrong with the basketball team? I’ve been told that we recruited all of these so called blue chip players and we were even NUMBER 1 in the nation this year. Yet, every game I have attended we have lost – except this last one to the land thieves – and THEY have lost 6 in a row.
Were these recruits all overrated?
"Stats are for losers - I like winning games!!" Will Muschamp
by littlelonghorngirl on Mar 2, 2010 7:33 PM CST reply actions
shawn williams redshirted i believe
avery bradley doesnt have a consistent jumper and hes timid going to the rim
jham(my boy) is coming along really well but was god awful at the start of the year in every facet
jcovan brown is solid but takes bad shots quite a bit. bad defense as well
by ibleedburntorange49-9 on Mar 2, 2010 10:44 PM CST up reply actions
obviously
every game I have attended we have lost
you are a jinx
it says something about how bad OU is that even your junxing presence couldn’t help them
;-)
lol
Very cute! Maybe I AM the problem.
"Stats are for losers - I like winning games!!" Will Muschamp
by littlelonghorngirl on Mar 9, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
Rick Barnes and "Hot Seat" should not be in the same sentence... EVER!!
RB is the one and only reason Texas Basketball is where it is today. The team has been decimated by injuries this year, and has had to rely on play of it’s (albeit wunderkind) freshmen. Any team with that much turbulence would have a nearly impossible time making a run be they Texas, or North Carolina, or Kentucky or Memphis, or UCLA., or…….
This team will dominate next year, if RB is allowed to run the team the way he’s always run it. Texas fans can’t expect our Basketball team to equate our Football team- I know I don’t have to say it, but it’s apples and oranges. This team WILL have success- RB has NOT just forgotten how to coach a top-10 BB team overnight. Just give them until next year, and hopefully the injury bug will have moved on to another team by then.
HOOK 'EM!!!
Horn from Houston
I still have hope for a deep run
With our freshman contributor’s, there is at least a chance things will click. That seems to have happened for Hamilton. Brown has teased a few times. Hopefully the 2nd half against OU help’s his confidence. I think the kid think’s too much. It makes him timid on the floor. When that happens he is a non factor. However, we desperately need his outside shot working. He has shown an ability to hit big shot’s in crunch time, but Barnes has to be able to trust him. AB is tough to figure out. He is a really good mid range shooter but disappears for long stretches. I would love to see him more aggressive. My other hope for optimism is Gary Johnson. He has been very consistent and gives us another banger who pull defender’s out to 15 feet. It’s time to tighten the rotation. Give these guy’s a chance to gel before tourney time.
"big-time players make big-time plays in big games."
Best thing about the OU win ..
.. is there is still reason to hope. Bring on the Bears, bring on the tournaments!

by 



























