Burnt Orange Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeff Sullivan's MLB Trade Deadline Primer

We're All Angry & Disappointed, But Replacing Rick Barnes Doesn't Make Sense

When you reach the thousand word mark of a comment, it's worth considering whether you're better off throwing it together into an actual post. My post yesterday drew many interesting and thoughtful responses, including more than a few in disagreement. Which is great. I'm here to lay out my reasons for the position I've arrived at, but there are numerous ways one might approach an evaluation of Barnes and it's enlightening to hear other perspectives.

Below I respond to a comment left by flamingmonkeyass in the post about Rick Barnes. The first part of my thoughts repspond to FMA's misconception about the meaning of the short list of proven title-winning coaches that was included in the post. Second, FMA apparently mistook my acknowledging the fact that hoops is a lower priority for the fan base as a whole for my being personally willingn to settle for good enough; this could not be further from the truth, and my conclusion that it would be a mistake to replace Rick Barnes at this time is not in any way a reflection of low expectations. There's nothing passive or semi-attached about my interest in and aspirations for Texas basketball.

The idea that Barnes is the 6th or 7th best coach

In the country is laughable. The idea that Texas would somehow need to replace him with one of those coaches you mentioned in order to reach the "elite" status is almost as absurd.

(1) To begin with, I did not say Rick Barnes is the 6th or 7th best coach in the country. My contention is that there are a handful of high-elite coaches who are proven title-winners, of such a caliber as to permit one to conclude -- immediately upon their hiring -- that Texas had upgraded from Rick Barnes. In this group are the handful of guys who've proven they can do it and do it consistently -- guys like Izzo, Krzyzewski, Self, etc.

Star-divide



The crux of my argument is that once you get to any and all coaches who are not in that group, it bcomes very difficult (near-impossible, I submit) to be certain Texas would be upgrading its coach. I agree with you that it isn't the case that those proven coaches are the ONLY way Texas can achieve the highest level of success (I never said they were), but I contend that those are the only ones who we could know that we're getting something better. As I just wrote in another comment above, responding to UT2001, who said Texas should be looking to hire an "up and coming" coach:
Up and coming coaches

It’s a fine idea in theory, but in practice not only is it a gamble, but I’m pretty sure we wouldn't be on the right side of the odds.


Three years ago, if Texas was looking for a coach Texas fans would have been delighted to get "up and coming" Keno Davis (Drake), Greg McDermott (Northern Iowa), or Todd Lickliter (Butler). All three were hot commodities, but since heading to Providence, Davis has yet to make the NCAA Tournament; Iowa State fans wanted McDermott fired after this year and though he’ll be back one more time, if he struggles again, he’s out. And Lickliter, of course, just got fired after three lousy years at Iowa during which time he went 38-57.

I’m glad to listen to arguments for replacing Barnes with someone else, but I think outside the top proven coaches in the game, not only is it difficult to predict who might be special enough to win a national title, but it’s even difficult to predict which coaches would be able to come in to Texas and match the level of success that we already have with Barnes. I feel confident in saying that many, and in all likelihood most, replacements would struggle to match Barnes’ consistent level of season success.

Add it all up and not only are the odds against us picking a guy who can win us a national title, but the truth is that many of the replacements we might choose would actually cause us to regress.

It is certainly possibly that Texas could strike gold hiring an up and coming coach, but it's a roll of the dice -- no question about it, and not just in terms of winning a title, but even in terms of matching the level of success that we already have right now, with Barnes. Add into the pot odds that Barnes himself has been to one Final Four and three Elite Eights, achieving success at a level that makes plausible to believe he is capable of breaking through at some point. All things considered, making the case for replacing Barnes with an up and coming coach is, in my view, not at all a strong one.

Alternatively, we could look at laying out the money to hire a coach who is not in that high-elite group but who has a substantial track record of proven success at a big program already. Another commenter mentioned Jamie Dixon, who would be a fine example of a coach I'd be be satisfied with Texas hiring to fill a vacancy.

While we know intimately well what Rick Barnes' teams struggle with, the main reason his warts appear to us to be so ugly is because we repeatedly inspect them up close. The obvious problem, as I see it, is that all coaches have strengths and weaknesses, and outside the proven high-elite coaches already discussed, it's hard to evaluate whose limitations are the kind that will prevent them from reaching the top of the mountain. From our vantage point, it's easy to say that Rick Barnes' limitations appear to be just such a kind, but I ask, in all seriousness, whether we really know that. It's possible someone can craft a compelling argument that Barnes' weaknesses are limitations of the kind that make his ultimate ceiling being just below the title-winning threshold. Nevertheless, I do think it's difficult to say anything definitive. There are at least two issues that we at the least have to keep in mind:

First, even if we all agree Texas basketball should be gunning to win titles, in evaluating our pursuit of the goal we still have to be mindful of context and the nature of college basketball.  Pick any coach you can think of and, even among the great ones, it's guaranteed you will find some serious struggles mixed in with the successes. Roy Williams missed the NCAA Tournament with four McDonalds All-Americans on his roster this year. In one of the weakest NCAA fields ever, Jim Calhoun is in the NIT. Competing in the weakest Pac 10 in recent memory, Ben Howland's Bruins got run out of the gym on a regular basis and didn't even get an NIT bid. Jay Wright was lucky to escape Robert Morris yesterday. John Thompson III saw his team lit up for triple-digits in a blowout loss to 14th seed Ohio. Does this make these coaches worthless? Obviously not, but it provides some useful perspective for evaluating our own disappointments.

And second, how is it that we're supposed to tell that any of these coaches outside the proven high-elite group will match and/or exceed Rick Barnes' proven level of success? We can (and should) point out Barnes' myriad weaknesses, but at the end of the day, it's a very very tough call to say with any certainty that a given coach will; provide superior results. Because the truth of the matter is, whether you like him or not, whether you think him the seventh best coach in the country or the sevntieth, you barely need two hands to count the number of coaches who have been achieving at Barnes' level since he arrived at Texas.

For example, heading into the 2009 season, Texas was one of just three teams that had advanced to the Sweet 16 or beyond in 5 of the previous 7 NCAA Tournaments. The other two to go 5 for 7? Kansas and Duke.

Or we can consider Jamie Dixon, who just completed his seventh year at Pitt, where he has accumulated a 188-53 (.775) record, going 83-35 (.703) in Big East play. He's made the NCAA Tournament in each of those seven years, advancing to the Sweet 16 twice and the Elite 8 once, exiting during the first weekend each of the other four appearances. Outside the high-elite group, that's as strong a track record as you're likely to see. And yet, even Dixon's superb level of achievement in his first seven seasons is only enough to match Rick Barnes. During his first seven years at Texas (1998-2005), Barnes went 160-69 (.698) overall, 92-30 (.754) in conference play, making the NCAA Tournament all seven years, making two trips to the Sweet 16, one to the Final Four, and four exits on the first weekend of the Tournament.

And though the last two seasons have been challenging ones for Texas fans, it's probably worth mentioning Barnes' track record in the five years since: a 133-46 record (.751), 56-24 in conference play (.700), with NCAA Tournament appearances in all five seasons, including a pair of trips to the Elite 8 and three exits on the first weekend of the Tournament.

My argument was, and consistently has been, that when you take all of this material together, there is no slam dunk case for replacing Rick Barnes. Quite the opposite, the overwhelming weight of the evidence comes down on the side of keeping what we've go, absent an opportunity to hire one of the ten or so coaches who would appear to present an unequivocal upgrade over Barnes. And thus, the conclusion in my post: It seems to me that our options as fans are limited to making the case that Texas should make an effort to go after one of the proven, high-elite coaches or, more realistically and productively, taking time to think about and discuss what we've gotten so far from Rick Barnes (good and bad) and -- looking forward -- what it is, specifically, we think we need to see from Barnes. Thinking now about what those benchmarks and thresholds might be can provide us with a meaningful lens through which to evaluate Barnes, clear of both recency and tunnel-vision biases. After all, conversations of this kind typically arise across the country in March, with fans disproportionately focused on the most recent event, which of course for all but one is a season-ending loss.

Last night's post was an argument that while this season's bitter disappointment does not tip the scales towards the replacement of Rick Barnes, the troubling manner with which things unraveled should serve as the catalyst for some serious evaluating and questioning. As I wrote last night, the thing I'm most going to focus my attention on over the next year or two is whether, and if so how well, Rick Barnes learns from recent struggles (this year, in particular) and demonstrates ability to make smart, sensible adjustments. I'm not ready to replace Rick Barnes right now, but I might if his reaction to this season were absent or uninspiring.

(2) As for the second part of FMA's comment, I think I've at least implicitly addressed the second part of FMA's comment with everything I just discussed, but this is worth saying explicitly and clearly, since I apparently left my post open to misinterpretation. FMA wrote:

Will Rick Barnes be replaced? 

Will Rick Barnes be replaced? Of course not. Should he be? That’s a bit more murky. As long as the program continues to have some success and makes money I don’t forsee him ever really coming under administration pressure. For those of us who don’t buy into the self defeatist attitude that we somehow don’t have the resources to have both an elite football and basketball program (ahem* Peter), that’s disappointing. We could be so much more when in comes to basketball. More importantly we SHOULD be so much more

I suppose there was a tinge of defeatism in my post insofar as I argued that unless fans want to argue that Texas should begin to look at whether it can hire one of the proven high-elite coaches to Austin, better to focus our attention on Rick Barnes and what he needs to do to improve. However, it was not "self-defeatist" in the way FMA suggests. First of all, I haven't any doubt at all that we have the resources to be an elite program in both football and basketball, and I've spent many thousands of words over the last five years writing about my love of Texas basketball, the high aspirations I have for the program, and how frustrating the football-first sports culture can be during hoops season.

Last night's message was not about me or my willingness to settle for less than the best. It was a candid (but wholly uncontroversial) assessment based on the reality of actual fan support of Texas basketball: We're a 50,000 student university in a town of a million people, with no competing pro teams in the city, yet we struggle to fill the lower level of the FEC during December games. It's fair to say that February and March are months of huge interest to Texas fans, so long as you're referring to football recruiting. And, as I wrote earlier this year, huge swaths of our fan base are at best semi-attached to the team and program, explaining how and why the same fans can be both content to accept mediocrity when expectations are low, and scream Burn it all down! when their expectations are raised but not met.

Whether you or I hates it and wants more for this program, that is the reality. And quite apart from the resources that we have, it is a reality that can, has, does, and will play a relevant role in how the program is run. To begrudgingly accept that fact and acknowledge the role it plays in evaluating Barnes' future is not self-defeating. It is pragmatic and reality-based.

It seems to me that underlying FAM's gripe is an idea that my conclusion (that fans should focus on how Barnes must improve, rather than on how he can be replace) reflects a passive acceptance of "good enough" where Texas basketball is concerned.

My view about Barnes isn't at all related to lowering my standards for basketball. My reasons for wanting to keep Rick Barnes right now are rooted in my analysis that replacing Rick Barnes would be the wrong move to make at this time. I'm not saying I've concluded that Barnes is a permanent answer; as I explained in last night's post, perhaps the best thing we might do is begin to think seriously about how to evaluate the job Barnes does over the coming couple of years. The single best thing we can do to help ourselves evaluate and make meaningful decisions about Barnes down the line, is to think through and articulate -- now, ahead of time -- what specifically we hope/want to see from him heading forward. Considering the odds facing any and every team, winning the national title may not be the best standard to make our determinations. A title-less season may or may not provide reason to be discouraged about the future; more helpful would be to have thought about what, specifically, are those things we want to see from Barnes and the program, irrespective of whether the team cuts down any nets.

I've begun thinking about what I expect Rick Barnes to do on the other side of this season -- things that I think can help provide a meaningful basis for making a decision as important and consequential as keep-him-or-cut-him.

As of now, I've yet to see a cohesive, concrete argument that persuades me a replacement should be made. But as always, I'm open to listening, if anyone thinks they've got one.

1 recs  |  Comment 55 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Barnes deserves much blame for this year

But I can’t see a good reason to replace him, especially if it’s for some “up and comer.” I think the fanbase should take the lesson of Mack Brown: Many wanted Mack gone a few years into his tenure, but now nobody does. I think you’re right about evaluating how Barnes reacts to failure. As polite and nice as Mack Brown seems, he fights back with a vengeance when he gets backed into a corner (such as after that humiliating performance in College Station in 2007). Will Barnes? I hope so. Before we know it, we may be bragging that he’s one of those “elite” coaches in the country.

As for what I want to see from Barnes:

1. If we’re going to keep the offensive philosophy that we have, he’s going to have to recruit hard after players who can create offense for us and also be patient with those that he has, like J’Covan Brown. Believe me, Brown did things all season that made me want to bang my head against a wall, but at the least, he had both the confidence and the ability to create things on offense that hardly anyone else would.

2. If not, then there obviously needs to be a change in that philosophy. Either Barnes needs to learn it or needs to bring in an assistant that can help him do it, because this incoherence on offense that we saw this season just can’t be tolerated. True, it would have helped if we were a far stronger defensive team, but we weren’t, and good offense helps players play defense anyway.

3. He needs to understand when to ride someone hard and when to teach in more “chill” way. I had trouble understanding what Barnes was doing this season. Sometimes, he seemed like a hard-liner with quick substitutions when somebody messed up, benching J’Covan Brown, and winding this entire team up tight. Then he often let them hang out to dry when they were on the bad end of a big run (which unfortunately happened quite a bit this year). In other words, there are times when a coach needs to let players play through mistakes and learn from them, and there are times when a coach needs to step in in a strong way. Barnes seemed to mix them up.

Anyway, I’m all for him staying, but man, we can’t have collapses like this again. That was a painful season.

by TheElusiveShadow on Mar 20, 2010 3:39 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm flattered.

Wow. Well, I’m honored that could be such a source of inspiration; even though I know you’re responding more the reactionary types that surround Texas basketball, than actually responding to me. Still, it’s quite an honor. You’re a brilliant writer and a great fan so it’s nice just to be noticed. However I still disagree with you. Well, perhaps not as much as either of us thinks. Let me explain.

I don’t think it would be wise to let Rick Barnes go after one disappointing season. In fact that would be ridiculous and would wind up do perhaps irrevocable harm to our program. No coach in the country would want to come to a school that caved in to such absurd fan expectation. No, I’m willing to let Rick go based upon his body of work; and because this is not his first disappointing season. Last year’s team was nowhere near as talented as this year’s team, so why do the two feel so similar? Why is that last year’s team started off so strong (and they did), playing hellacious defense, only to wind down the stretch completely lost on offense, unable to guard any kind of offensive set, and showing absolutely zero basketball IQ? I honestly don’t know. The problem is that clearly Barnes doesn’t either. Because the same problems from that team, have manifested themselves on this team. I suspect next year’s team will start off strong, show tremendous defensive ability early in the year, and then fade into a shell of its former self around mid January. Before this year I think most of us wrote it off as Rick’s teams getting "gassed"; but now I’m beginning that it’s just his M.O.

His disappointing teams don’t just include the last two years either. Everyone talks about how great the Kevin Durant year was. It wasn’t. He was fantastic. I’d dare say he was the greatest college freshman of all time. Perhaps one of the greatest college basketball players ever. And Rick Barnes took that sort of supernova talent, paired it with another future lottery pick in D.J. Augustin, coupled those two with some tremendous role players and produced….what, exactly? A second round exit? Do you truly believe that there are many that coaches out there that would struggle to obtain those lofty heights with that kind of talent? Perhaps you do. I do not. In fact I suspect that certain coach now plying his trade in College Station could have achieved such success, if not more so. To me, that’s such an incredibly sad statement I almost cannot even compute it.

Now I know some are going to come back with the D.J. led Texas team that reached the Elite Eight the following year. That was a hell of a coaching job. I never said Barnes isn’t a good coach, just not a great coach. Sometimes it seems like he struggles the most with his most talented teams. More than one naysayer has wondered if he isn’t better suited to coaching a team that has one great talent (hopefully a point guard) surrounded by solid to good role players. The problem with that of course is that it almost always takes an elite amount of talent at multiple positions to win a national title. Since I have no doubt that’s something that Barnes wants, he’s continually forced to put himself into a coaching weakness.

There are also those who undoubtedly are going to counter by suggesting that those other coaches may not have been able to get a guy like Kevin Durant to come to Texas. Perhaps. Perhaps not. Personally I tend to believe that Rick Barnes is a tremendous recruiter; but that his success in that area has been a combination of things, and not just a result of his own talents. Towards the end of Penders’ tenure Texas basketball had begun to make some serious strides in basketball recruiting. Chris Mihm was not a Barnes recruit. And although it turned sour for us, Luke Axtell was a highly sought after national recruit as well. Would Tourney Tom have had the success that Barnes has had? Absolutely not. For one he wouldn’t have been sober enough to make to enough AAU games. Would another coach have had as much success as Barnes? Hard to say. Would a new coach be able to capitalize on the momentum that Barnes and (perhaps just as important) the Texas football program has generated and continue to recruit well nationally? Again that’s hard to say. But my brain and my gut tell me yes. And regardless, arguing that a coach should not be let go when he’s producing underwhelming results by saying that he’s bringing top talent, is not really helping his case. There’s a reason no golfer in the world has blamed his sliced tee shot on having an incredible and accurate driver.

Okay, so now it’s getting late and I’m afraid I don’t have nearly as good a gift with words as yourself, so I’ll try and make this last part brief. I apologize for my inability to do that earlier. My problem, my reason for using a phrase such as "self defeatist’, stems from this idea that should Texas replace Rick Barnes they might not get anyone better. Or worse, they might actually get someone not as good. Heaven forbid! You mean instead of hoping for the occasional Sweet 16/Elite Eight run coupled with multiple first or second round exits, we’d instead have to hope to make the tournament and hope for a first or second round exit? You mean we might slip from our mighty perch of slight national relevance to a lowlier plateau of tiny national relevance? Whatever would we do? I mean besides fire the coach that allowed that to happen? You know, three years after he got here? And then put together a package to go after an even bigger, better name? You’re right though that those three years might be rough. Might even be as rough as say having a team go from being ranked #1 to being knocked out in the first round by an underwhelming 9 seed. You see my problem here is this fear that in reaching for greatness, we might fail. So what? At least we’re reaching for greatness. I can live with that. You yourself have pointed out the fickleness of the Texas fans when it comes to basketball. If you’re worried that the casual UT fan will stop caring and stop coming because Texas isn’t ranked in the top 25 every year like they are with Barnes, you can go ahead and stop worrying. Texas fans don’t care and don’t come to games now. And trust me, having the general fan base get its expectations to such lofty heights (ranked #1), only to see them come crashing down at the end has done more harm to trying to reach the average Horn fan than three or four years of mediocrity could ever do. And that might be the most disappointing thing of all from this season.

Having said all that, there’s no way Rick Barnes gets released. In reality, he’s done more than enough for this program to warrant a long leash, and I’m sure he’s got one from DeLoss. Is his leash as long with the fans? Not as long as it used to be, that’s for sure. I understand that I’m upset, and I know that in the coming weeks and months my ire will probably subside and I’ll realize that it’s foolish to think about letting Rick Barnes go. I mean I like Rick, I really do. I hope he can have a career renaissance similar to Mack’s. I seriously hope so; and not just for Texas’ sake but for his own. I hope he brings in some incredible offensive guru and gets this thing turned around. But for now, I’m left with my anger, and a certainty that we could do better.

Hook’em

by flamingmonkeyass on Mar 20, 2010 5:00 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Haha

Nice!

"The best decision I ever made was coming to Texas," James said. "The second-best decision was coming back."

by blazzinken on Mar 20, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the response

This is why I haven’t burned out after five years writing. Great community we’ve got here. I’ll (try to) limit my response this time to something shorter, which might be worth a post sometime, but certainly not now.

Sifting through all the responses to Barnes, you could roughly file the various positions into three categories:

There are out-and-out haters (I’m looking at you, Dawnpotrol), who may well be on the right side of the issue but don’t give us much to work with beyond their opinion that he mostly sucks.

There are those, like myself, who aren’t exactly brimming with confidence about Barnes right now, but who nonetheless see no compelling reason to replace him.

And finally there are those, like yourself, who seem interested in replacing him and can articulate thoughtful reasons for wanting to do so.

While in this comment you’ve rightly identified where we diverge, I’m not sure you’re understanding the particular reasons I reject your position. Which is probably a lack of clarity on my part. In any case, the essential disagreement is this:

From your evaluation of Barnes’ demonstrated weakness, you not only see a reason to take action, but would view not taking action as “self-defeating” behavior. I get the sentiment, and were I to agree with the premises, would sign off on the conclusion: when the situation calls for ‘playing to win’, so to speak, you should.

However, my position is compatible with much of what’s on your mind, except that I expressly reject the suggestion that to do nothing is to secure defeat. A big part of my long post was about rejecting this premise, which can be assumed but has yet to be compellingly demonstrated to my satisfaction. To put my own position into your language, I think the decisive fact in this Barnes situation is that we simply cant say we know with certainty that (1) a replacement would be an improvement and (2) Barnes is incapable of better down the line. Your argument is that we can know (2) about Barnes, and while I might concede that we have reasons to doubt Barnes, we’re talking about a coach who has been to three Elite 8’s and a Final Four; we’re not waiting on him to cross state lines here — he’s been in the right neighborhood for some time. Which just leaves, in my view, this:

1. We can’t say we know whether a new hire would be an improvement

2. We can’t say we know whether Barnes is incapable of growing and improving, and he’s not so far from the mountaintop that we’re talking about a level of growth that’s just plain wishcasting.

3. And finally, we’re dealing with a 12 year resume that has a smattering of disappointments (this year by far the worst), but is on the whole as strong as you can be without taking that last step into the upper-upper-echelong where titles are won.

If you accept all three of those as true, not only is there no case for replacing Barnes right now, but from a strategic standpoint it would be wreckless — in a self-defeating way, I’d argue — to do so. Were the facts were different and you could tell me, right now, that you have a time machine and you know that Barnes will never be more than he is right now, I too would think it worthwhile to take a stab at another coach, even if it included risk of regression. On this conclusion, we agree very much. Where we differ is in seeing the premises that give rise to the conclusion. We don’t know whether we can do better, we don’t know whether Barnes has hit his ceiling, and his overall track record is far too good — a mere single notch below the top-level success we say we want. Given that, there’s nothing self-defeating about concluding that the wisest move is to keep Barnes and begin looking for how we can get the evidence we need to reject one of the three premises. When I say I want to focus on what I need to see from Barnes heading forward, I mean that this calculation changes if we can make the case that Barnes’ chances of achieving elite success are too minimal to be counted as in play. When that premise falls, the case for keeping him falls with it.

So I would just note that I can understand what you’re getting at, while at the same time rejecting your conclusion as supported by anything firm enough to justify it to my satisfaction. In my view, the riskier move, with more potential threat to do self-harm, would be replacing Barnes before we have the knowledge we need to make that decision.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Mar 20, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

agree about the Durant year

I say it was worse than this year. A team with Durant should go to atleast the final four with him alone.

by Longhorns84 on Mar 20, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Barnes Should Stay

At this point Barnes deserves to stay because of his “Career Achievements” alone. But, I agree with PB that this season forces us(and Dodds) to take a look at his coaching prowess over the next couple of seasons. Barnes is now officially on “watch”. I think he would agree with this too as Barnes has said this was one of his worst coaching perfomances.

These have all been great reads but I have yet to see where Barnes ranks in pay among the rest of the country. I ask because I think this could be an underlying issue with many fans. If he’s paid in the top 10, then we should get our money’s worth as fans.

Barnes definitely deserves what he makes because of his recruiting alone. But, at some point, he has to coach those recruits “up”. If Barnes can’t do it, then bring in Muschamp.

Hook’em!

Cool. You can blow your nose and wipe your buttt at the same time.

by Texantt on Mar 20, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Obvious choice

Since UNC had a worse year than we did, obviously Roy Williams will be fired. He’d be a great replacement for Barnes.

Now that I’ve got that out of my system, a more serious observation. It sounds like Peter is assuming that the fire-Barnes cries are coming from casual fans, the ones who don’t come in December and don’t yell when they come. I think not. I think they come from people who were bummed out by the MNC and jumped on the #1 basketball team to ease the pain. I can imagine the let down and the need to blame someone. Barnes is the obvious (and only) target.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Mar 20, 2010 8:51 AM CDT reply actions  

Thanks for saying it instead of me.

I don’t think this is universal to only those disappointed with the MNC loss, but I would certainly agree that many jumped on the #1 train for whatever reason. More than just those disappointed with the last failed national championship opportunity, I tend to think it is closely related to the aforementioned fact that Texas is primarily a football school. Nothing wrong with that, but unless you are going to be as committed to basketball as the former, it would be unfit to criticize Barnes to the degree we’re seeing. Perhaps a bad example and definitely not a direct parallel, but it would not be unfair for me to call for the firing of Jerritt Elliot because we blew a two set lead in the NC.

by Infield Elephant on Mar 20, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

correction

it would be unfair for me to call…

by Infield Elephant on Mar 20, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

The difference

Roy Williams has a substanially richer resume than Rick Barnes, as does Jim Calhoun, who also suffered a rough year. The big difference though between Rick and those two comes down to one thing. Williams an Calhoun have national titles. That’s a big skin on the wall and it gets you a lot more leverage within the fan base.

by flamingmonkeyass on Mar 20, 2010 11:29 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

This is true

As it did with Mack Brown. However, that difference isn’t relevant to what the right decision is. The fact that Barnes has not won a National Title simply makes it more difficult to see that the right thing to do is keep him. Which is why posts are coming so harshly after this disappointment.

But his talents, resume, and the nature of college basketball….. it is the right thing to keep him.

"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese

by SwimTexas on Mar 20, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Surely we don't have to point out

the differences between Roy Williams and Rick Barnes or North Carolina and Texas?

by kellen on Mar 20, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

seems familiar territory

Admit that I didn’t see any BB games in person this year (after a 15 year absence, prayer was rewarded and we moved back to Austin this month) and didn’t see every game on TV. That said, it seems like Barnes is in exactly the same position Mack was in following the 2006 loss to tamu. He needs to walk over to Mack’s office and ask for some advice, because the parallels are eerily similar — lack of coherent effort from an abundance of talent, seemingly weak effort from assistants, etc. Just a thought.

by nvrfrgt63 on Mar 20, 2010 9:51 AM CDT reply actions  

We need to.

We have one of the biggest arenas in college basketball. It may not seat as many as the biggest, but it is one of the biggest in terms of size. We absolutely have to get a new arena only for longhorn basketball. If we can cut the seating capacity to 9-10,000 we will fill that thing up every night. It would create the home court advantage we don’t seem to often generate and it will also breath new life into Rick Barnes and the program as a whole. The fan base will be more energetic, the players will be more energetic and the coaches will be more energetic.

I really feel that for us to be successful in basketball it is not replacing Rick Barnes who really is one of the most consistent coaches in the country. It is to go out find some assistant coaches that will bring in new ideas and new blood, create a home court advantage(something that players would be excited to come to Texas for and play games at), and I think it is no longer acceptable to not hold Texas Basketball to higher standard. It is unfortunate that Rick Barnes is becoming a victim of his own success, but there is no reason that we can’t set the bar higher. If any university in the country has the resources to compete nationally in Basketball, Football, and Baseball its Texas.

"Dont yall think that crystal beautiful yall?" -Vince Young

by Texastriplecrown on Mar 20, 2010 10:26 AM CDT reply actions  

+1 re: arena

I want to piggy back on this arena complaint but perhaps it’s best as a new thread. I don’t post much, so sorry if I put this in the wrong place.

Regardless, I believe the FEC is an impediment to the evolution of our program. Texastriplecrown put it very well as to what we might need.

I attended the 40 Acres during the BMW days (Lance Blanks signed my Come Dance with Lance t-shirt outside of Moore-Hill) and have had a love for Texas hoops ever since. I do not attend games there anymore. As a non-season ticket holder I usually sit in the upper deck, while looking at a half filled lower level. I could be tortured up there and no one below would even hear me scream, not to mention anyone as low as the floor level. I’d rather hang out in a dentist’s office.

We’ve heard all of the complaints from the attendance, the noise level, atmosphere, the people sitting on their hands in the front rows ( I did get to sit down there once) while telling the rest of us to hush and sit down (if I offended you I’m not sorry- stand up and cheer or stay home), etc. Chip Brown calls it the Humdrum. That is not the reputation you want for your home floor and opposing teams have no trepidation about playing there. I think it is unforgivable that these issues do not seem to be addressed.

Until something changes, I will not go. It’s a black hole for enthusiasm. Sadly, I find that my passionate entreaties and encouragement for the team and my ranting to the officials are heard just as well by those ears if I am yelling at my tv in the living room.

Yes, you still have to play ball but I feel sorry for Coach Barnes, Coach G, and the boys and girls who have to play in that soulless arena.

by SilentQ1991 on Mar 20, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater....

I am very frustrated with Rick this year. I do NOT however think that firing him is an option. I point to the simple example of Nebraska football. What did Frank Solich do to get fired? Win 10 games a year? If you replace a coach you have to replace him with someone of equal or greater caliber and I’m not sure too many of those guys are walking around.

That said, I’m also someone resistant to change.

by DreadedOne on Mar 20, 2010 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Nebraska is a poor example.

Nebraska was extremely relevant on a national level in college football. Texas is not, as much as we’d like to believe it is, truly relevant on a national stage in basketball. I doubt the casual basketball fan outside the state of Texas would even think to include the Longhorns in their top 10 or even 15 programs in the country. In addition nebraska’s situation is the worst case scenario and there were certainly other factors in play besides a bad coaching hire that has led the Huskers’ struggles. Even so, Nebraska also shows that even a terrible coaching hire can be corrected in a relatively short period.

by flamingmonkeyass on Mar 20, 2010 11:39 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

The fact people don't include

Texas in their top 15 programs in the country doesn’t make the statement false.

by DoubleB on Mar 20, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rick Barnes

He should be given a raise fir putting up with the freshman who think the should be in the NBA instead of learning how the game should be played as a TEAM sport My thoughts on Rick is he is as good a coach as there in in the country just look at Roy Williams this year.

by czell41 on Mar 20, 2010 10:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Another mindreader

How do you know what the players think?

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Mar 20, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know about a raise

but I agree that Barnes was not the problem with this team. If our 91% and 70% free throw shooters had hit two of four at the end of the game we wouldn’t be having this discussion, at least not right now. Same goes for having our top two rebounders, potential NBA picks, leading a dismal effort on defense, especially on the boards. I think we were down 46-26 on the glass at one point and every time I looked the opponent again had an uncontested dunk on James or Pittman or a guard splitting the lane. My first thought after the game was over was that Barnes is probably as relieved as I am that this season is over. This team had terrible chemistry and played without heart.

I’ll commend Barnes for one thing- handling the situation with class and dignity.

"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal

by SpiritOfTheFedora on Mar 20, 2010 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have worried about Barnes...

ever since he came to Texas. I watched him pretty closely at Clemson. His MO there was a good program, tough kids, but he did not win big games. He is weak with Xs and Os and coaching within the game. What has he done here. He has won. The program brings in big time recruits. Except for this year, you can pretty much count on the team putting forth excellent defensive effort. But, in tight games (like the Wake game), I don’t see Barnes coaching. I don’t see him defending his players when they are the victims of bad calls (like James’ fifth in overtime). And that sends a message to the kids.

I think we need to concentrate on something Barnes himself unfortunately stuck his foot in his mouth about, and that’s championships. But not NCAA tourney championships, let’s look at conference championships first. And in 12 years, Barnes has zero conference tourney championships. He had plenty of opportunities. The Durant team had that championship in the bag, and Kansas came back and took it away. And that isn’t the only time a Barnes coached team has blown a big lead in a championship game. If we can’t win our conference tourney one time, how can we legitimately say we are a basketball power worthy of consideration for a national title? We can’t.

All in all though, I agree with Peter for now. I think though some people really need to push Barnes to improve is in game coaching. I would like to see him concentrate on winning a conference tournament championship. We need to take that step first folks. Let’s beat KU or KState, or hell, now maybe Baylor or A&M in a conference final before we think we are good enough to beat Syracuse or Kentucky in a Final Four game. Barnes needs to feel some pressure though to raise his game, or we’re going to be fighting for fifth place in our conference year after year after year.

by pantherchap on Mar 20, 2010 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Since Some Have Made Comparison To Mack Brown

I think you have to look at some factors that have made Brown successful. Brown is known as a master recruiter and he has hired top assist coaches (well, maybe Greg Davis doesn’t fit). Anyhow, numerous posters have mentioned the assist coach issue for basketball so that doesn’t bear repeating. On recruiting, it is assumed that Barnes is a master recruiter like Brown. In the previous “End of the Road” writeup, a poster (flodeth) noted that while Barnes has recruited some top flight talent, there has not been such a strong supporting cast and he presents detail and a pretty good argument for that. Regarding recruiting, an article in this morning’s Houston paper quotes Scott Drew on recruiting (yes, I know there are a lot of questions about his tactics) – “Our job is to recruit elite players and bring them to our school. If we do that, we’re going to be successful. So we’re definitely going to do that. WE’RE SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT IF YOU DON’T HAVE GOOD PLAYERS, YOU’RE NOT A GOOD COACH.”

Bottom line in my opinion, upgrade assist coaches and try to upgrade recruiting. Barnes can do this and I think he is the best guy for the job right now.

by gcinthewoods on Mar 20, 2010 11:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Carolina March

I just had a look at the SBM blog for UNC, Carolina March, to see what they are thinking about Roy Williams. Oddly, I saw no postings suggesting that he be replaced. There were some criticisms of the players and thoughts about the rotation, but no one demanding red meat for the down season.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Mar 20, 2010 11:29 AM CDT reply actions  

It's probably easy to console themselves.

All they have to do is head down to campus and take a gander at the NC trophys he’s brought them. If Rick had provided us with that option we probably wouldn’t be having this discussion.

by flamingmonkeyass on Mar 20, 2010 12:12 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think the comparison to make is not...

2010 Barnes vs 2010 Williams, but 2010 Barnes vs 2000 Williams.

For all of Williams success at Kansas, there were plenty of disappointing NCAA exits. Indeed, a tearful Williams explaning how much he loved his seniors who had just lost in the sweet sixteen was one of the rites of March. Williams’ teams at Kansas were absolutlely loaded. For God’s sake, his team with Paul Pierce, Jacque Vaughn and Raef LaFrentz (among others) lost in the round of 16. He had the best winning pct of anyone in the 90s, with no championships to show for it.

My point is not that Barnes is as good a coach as Williams. It is to say that even a great coach, at an elite program can struggle to get over the hump. Winning a NC in b-ball requires a great deal of luck and even good teams and great coaches can get derailed by a hot team.

Barnes has put the Texas program in the conversation with the great programs in the country. He has had his down years (and this year was excruciating at times) but lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Mar 20, 2010 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Barnes has put the Texas program in the conversation with the great programs in the country.”

But how many other coaches, given the resources at Texas in the past 12 years, could have done something similar? I think that list is a little bit longer than Barnes fans want to believe.

by DoubleB on Mar 20, 2010 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

there are other coaches who coould have done it...

but to say that that list is long is not supported by evidence. First of all, the fact that before Barnes, we had not come remotely close to this kind of b-ball success must count for something. I’ll grant that we’re in a better position for hoops succes than we were 30 years ago, but if it were so easy to be successful here, then surely some other coach would’ve sniffed it in the past 50 years.

Secondly, we’ve established that Barnes’ record other the last few years is one of the best and we’re one of 3 schools to reach the sweet 16 in 5 of the last 7 years. If there are lots of coaches who could best the success that Barnes has had, where are they? Surely there must be at least a few universities with some of the advantages that Texas has (lost of $$, good facilities, naturall recruiting base, etc) that would have some of these guys putting up as good or better numbers?

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Mar 20, 2010 7:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

“then surely some other coach would’ve sniffed it in the past 50 years.”

The college athletics world isn’t what it was even 25 years ago, much less 50. The tournament was an afterthought to the NIT as late as the early 1970s. By the time college basketball became a “big deal” in the early 80s, the SWC was already beginning its slow decline as well as Texas athletics, particularly football. Not until the formation of the Big XII which gave Texas more money, more exposure, and wiped the stink of the SWC off the brand were the resources in place to be successful. And the only guy who’s gotten to coach in that situation is Barnes.

And how about looking at some guys in the Big XII? Did anyone think Baylor would sniff the tournament this decade, much less the Sweet 16 after the entire Bliss debacle? How about the job Frank Martin has done at Kansas State? I think A&M cares less about basketball than Texas and they’ve advanced to the second round of the tournament 5 straight years now. None of those guys has the track record of success that Barnes has, but they also aren’t working with the same resources in terms of money and brand that Barnes has at his disposal.

by DoubleB on Mar 21, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Chicken and egg

where did these resources come from? From thin air?

Being a football powerhouse doesn’t suddenly attract us basketball talent. If that was the case, why aren’t the top level basketball recruits signing with Florida, LSU, Alabama, USC, Virginia Tech, Penn St, etc.? How about TCU and Boise St. for that matter?

The answer is Rick Barnes PROVIDED Texas with these resources you’re suggesting were somehow already there. Barnes took this program to the level it is now, and he created the resources. Ridiculous to even imply he’s been enjoying some sort of gold mine that is the Texas Basketball tradition. Reality is before Barnes, there was no basketball tradition. Barnes is the reason we are where we are. For the one poster that suggested he should get a lifetime contract (like Mack basically), you won’t hear me complain about it.

by goingforthecorner on Mar 20, 2010 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Has the Penders era been completely erased from everyone's mind?

8 NCAA tournaments in 10 years in a SWC that was falling apart at the time.

Those resources were provided by a Texas athletic department that stopped looking inward and started acting like the large behemoth it should have been from the get-go. They were provided by a jump to the Big XII which provided much more exposure and money as well as legitimacy than was available in a dying SWC.

Yes, Barnes has raised the school’s program to new heights, something I don’t believe Penders would have been able to do if the situations were reversed. But to argue that Penders had the same amount of resources at his disposal as Barnes is ridiculous.

by DoubleB on Mar 21, 2010 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

My point is you create your own resources

The resources this basketball program has IS because of Barnes’ accomplishments. Why didn’t Penders have them? You can start with recruiting.

by goingforthecorner on Mar 21, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you could

create your own resources then how come Rice basketball sucks ass?

Other than Gonzaga, I can’t think of one mid-major hoops program that has a long record of success. Maybe Temple in the A-10, although they had a long tradition prior to that.

Some jobs are just better than others. And the job Barnes walked into in 1998 was much better than the job Penders had in 1988.

And I’m not arguing Barnes hasn’t done a good job at Texas. He certainly has. But I do believe the program’s ceiling is higher than where it’s at and I don’t believe he can get it there.

by DoubleB on Mar 21, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Barnes

He recruits pretty good, but I think UT draws the recruit. I just don’t see good coaching on any of the past Barnes teams. He’s had good players that brought him success.

by Longhorns84 on Mar 20, 2010 12:20 PM CDT reply actions  

so...

if it is alll great and talented players, with no coaching component, what happened with this team?

"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010

by SaintBevo on Mar 20, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

overrated recruits

Bradley=4stars
Hamilton=4 stars
Brown=3 stars

The class shouldn’t of had any 5 star players. I didn’t see any 5 star players this year.

by Longhorns84 on Mar 20, 2010 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not a massive basketball fan here...

But UT certainly didn’t “draw the recruit” basketball-wise before Barnes got here. I was a student and regular fan during the Penders era, to give it a little context.

by bhudson on Mar 22, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

true, but

I think the times have changed in b-ball. Some of the traditional powers back in the day have had struggles recently (until this year: UK and Duke). Some of the football schools are starting to make some noise.

by Longhorns84 on Mar 22, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great discussion folks

I’m definitely on PB’s side. The expectations surround the football program have slowly crawled it’s way to the basketball program. The problem is unlike football, it’s not our birthright to make the Sweet 16 every year. Years like these will happen, and it’s happened to every great basketball program. See: UCLA, UConn, UNC, Arizona. When was the last time Duke made a Final Four? Everything is going right for Bill Self now, only a few years ago, his great Kansas teams were getting upset in the 1st round by Bucknell and Bradley. I imagine there were a few KU fans that might have been looking in a new direction at that time.

I believe the problem right now with Texas is recruiting, and it’s twofold. 1) Our best players leave too early and 2) some or most of the players that do stay 4 years are either bad basketball players or extremely one-dimensional in their role.

This isn’t football where you have a huge roster and depth chart. Each individual selection of players Barnes and staff choose to add to our roster is critical, and frankly, there have been too many misses. Just to name a few in the last few years – Harrison Smith, Matt Hill, Clint Chapman, Alexis Wangmene, Jai Lucas (transfer). I wouldn’t call Justin Mason a bust, but his overall production value didn’t justify the playing time he was getting.

Then on top of that, Barnes has made some odd selections. Dexter Pittman clearly had a weight issue and was a project. Why would Barnes even touch this guy? Sure our training staff is elite, but he had to know it would take a few years to get him in playable condition. And of course, even when he was able to play, the playing style required to maximize his effectiveness was not a good fit for the rest of the players. Dogus Balbay was another interesting pick (definitely not a bad one as a backup PG). Given that Barnes pretty much NEEDS an NBA-caliber PG to run the show for his offense to be effective, what was the thinking process in bringing in a PG who has no shooting capabilities whatsoever?

Not saying I’d rather have Mark Turgeon, but I would like Barnes to be able to mix in his ability to recruit the blue-chips with Turgeon’s ability to find the underrated players with a great work ethic, tough, and aren’t liabilities at either end of the floor. Outside of Elonu and DeAndre Jordan, everyone buys into the program and stays all 4 years. His team completely mirrors a mid-major school, and it’s not a bad thing, as I see them contending for the Sweet 16 every year as long as he stays there (I’m really hoping he takes the Oregon job).

Barnes actually was doing it the right way a few years ago. Look at the Final Four team. Full of high quality role players that stayed all 4 years (Thomas, Mouton, Ivey, Buckman, Boddicker, Harris) and one blue chip recruit in T.J. Ford. Now that the reputation of the program has elevated since, the blue star recruits are coming and going like we’re a pit stop in a NASCAR race and it’s destroying the consistency of success we once had.

We have had some good players recently that stay (and will stay) 4 years (Atchley, Abrams, James, Johnson, Pittman), but just not enough to sustain a high level of consistency. More importantly, we really struggle with this when it comes to point guards. Wouldn’t it have been nice to have Donald Sloan or Tweety Carter on this team? Even Kansas and their high-level recruiting abilities were able to keep Sherron Collins all 4 years.

by goingforthecorner on Mar 20, 2010 1:35 PM CDT reply actions  

I think one factor that continuously

gets left out when discussing this topic issue the issue of time. I would tend to agree with 80% of PB’s posts (do not agree with the lowering of standards because it’s basketball aspect) or any of the “Barnes gets a mulligan” posts if this were year 5, 6 or 7 of Barnes’ run. But it’s not. It’s year 12. Because of this, the comparison to Mack Brown does not hold up either. As far as the comparison to McDermott, Lickliter and Davis goes, surely there is a significant enough difference between Texas and Nebraska, Iowa and Iowa State when it comes to pay, facilities, recruiting, etc. to make that comparison a less than stellar one.

by kellen on Mar 20, 2010 2:00 PM CDT reply actions  

No

the issue of time is not left out. Twelve years is not enough for MANY great coaches — including but not limited to: Roy Williams (Kansas), Jim Boeheim (Syracuse), Gary Williams (Maryland), and Jim Calhoun (Uconn)…

Unless, of course, you think neither of the above listed coaches are good enough for Texas.

by whodat on Mar 20, 2010 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rick Barnes should be guaranteed a coaching position for life

You make tons of good points in your article- from the fact that many of the perennial powerhouses had an off-year this year to the fact that RB’s track record has been amongst the best in college basketball since he arrived on campus over a decade ago.

The reason that this team failed to deliver down the stretch was actually two reasons: first, injuries plagued the team, and second, the team had character issues that RB was unable to coach them out of. Although either can ultimately be laid at the feet of the head coach, the truth is that not every problem is solveable.

The fact is that as “All-World” as the recruits are that RB brings to my alma mater, they are still freshmen. It is a very very rare frosh indeed that can put a team on his back and carry them to the promised land. When adversity strikes, the lack of prior exposure to it causes these kids to put their heads down. And then they have to decide whether or not it’s worth it to hang around. The culture that they come from does not allow them to stick around- they need to get paid and paid NOW because that’s the world that they come from and understand. As a result, the character of the team is subject to a lot of turnover, and this is not something that even the very best coaches can always overcome. Coach K is less immune to the problem because of the kind of kids he can say “no” to when it comes to playing ball at Duke, but even then, Coach K doesn’t win them all….

Turnover does not provide a good foundation for a quality “character” ball-club. Character, or rather the lack of it, was pure and simple the reason for the melt-down this year. If the youngsters who were on this team are around next year, chances are that they will be better for the adversity that they faced THIS year. But it is just as up to them to return to school as it was up to them to get it done on the court. Let’s not forget- this was a team that started 17-0 and was ranked #1 in the country for one brief moment in time.

Tom Penders had a pretty broad base of support here until he had some adversity in his last season due to a snot-nosed whiner of a kid who ultimately transferred off to Kansas to become another nobody. The turbulence that was created by the character problems of that team were enough to sweep Penders up and out of Austin, fortunate to not be tarred and feathered. Penders was (up until Barnes) the very best BB coach Texas had ever landed, but the success he had was not enough to solidify the loyalty of the fans behind him. Barnes is head and shoulders above Penders in terms of his CV of success since becoming a head coach, and has shown loyalty to the university by not seeking the various PLUM opportunities elsewhere that have emerged since he stepped on the Forty Acres.

To put it bluntly, Texas hasn’t had the kind of success on the basketball court that is being crowed for right now because Texas hasn’t got the kind of basketball sophistication that a Duke, a NC, or a Kansas has…. maybe it’s the football mentality and our fans don’t have the bandwidth for a 30+ game season, or maybe it’s something else. The fact is, Texas fans have got a long way to go still before (or if ever) we deserve to have the kind of success that RB can (and given enough time- WILL) deliver.

It’s okay to be disappointed in the performance of our BB team this season- we’re fans and we are allowed that. But RB never once gave up on the team, although he probably saw the writing on the wall when the snowball started downhill just after the #1 ranking. The bottom line is that RB is the best BB coach Texas has ever had- he can and will be the Darrell Royal of Texas BB if he gets the chance. He’s been loyal to UT even though better spots have come open. WE OWE HIM the loyalty that he has shown us.

HOOK 'EM!!!

Horn from Houston

by HornfromHouston on Mar 20, 2010 2:50 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

You Make A Very Good Point

in noting the loyalty shown to UT by Rick Barnes. I have sat in the Erwin Center many times with stands half filled or only 200-300 students on hand and wondered why a top flight coach would stay at a school with that kind of support for basketball. I’m sure Barnes has had opportunities to go elsewhere but he hasn’t. So thanks for reminding everyone about Rick’s loyalty to UT.

by gcinthewoods on Mar 20, 2010 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Character

What do you (or any of us) really know about the character of these players? Character is about the kind of person you are, not how you play on the court. OK, Hamilton takes some bad shots. Does that mean he is selfishly ignoring his teammates — or maybe that he is taking what he thinks are good shots, but has not yet learned how game situations determine what is a good shot. If that’s the case, then with experience he will take better shots. Maybe you think Brown makes risky passes because he wants to show off. But it might be that he is pressing to overachieve because he is insecure with his role on the team, something we all can relate to and not a character flaw in my book. I can’t imagine what you think is wrong with Bradley. He seems to me like a dedicated, hardworking team player.

My point is that unless we know the players ourselves or have good information from those who do, we have no business impugning their character.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Mar 20, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kids are Kids

Character is something you develop as you get older. It’s the quilt of your life based on the way you respond to the experiences you have. What I was suggesting was that the freshmen on this team LACK character, not that they have bad character.

Perhaps the wording is confusing- here’s another way to say it: When your well of experience from which to draw upon in hard times is not there, it is impossible to draw the water you need for a difficult journey. The only way to make the well deeper is to dig it out-one shovelful at a time. The kids are developing character, it’s not their fault that they don’t have any yet.

Once upon a time, this was what sports was REALLY all about.

HOOK 'EM!!!

Horn from Houston

by HornfromHouston on Mar 21, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Expectations provide results....

I have been a casual observer of BON for a while now, but have never commented before so here is my two-cents for what its worth.

Texas will not win a Natl Championship with Barnes. I may have to swallow my words down the line, but nothing I have seen from Barnes’ 12 years at Texas proves that he can do it.

Yes, he recruits elite talent, but the best of the best leave within 1-2 years of joining the program. Texas seems to be merely a stopover on their way to NBA, and there is no commitment to staying and playing for a Natl Championship ala a Tyler Hansborough or a Colt McCoy. Barnes is cognizant of this and unfortunately from his statements it appears he aids and abets that approach.

And why does Barnes think that way? I believe part of it is because of the fans’ expectations. If the Basketball program was the football program, Barnes would not survive after a season like this and making the statements he did. Texas never had a legitimate Basketball Program before Barnes and whatever exists today is because of RB. As a result the fanbase was also ecstatic at the success and the elite level that he pushed the program to.

But the Bball fanbase, as a whole, at present does not crave and expect a Natl Championship with the same intensity as the Football fanbase. Or like other elite Bball schools such as Kansas, North Carolina, Kentucky or Duke with storied histories and a continuing expecation of a Title every single year.

But the level of discontent we see now is actually a good sign. Fans are expecting more and reaching the NCAA’s and winning a few games are not good enough anymore. The benchmark has visibly shifted and that, according to me, is a good thing. This expectation is what will drive and fuel a push for a Coach that can deliver the Title or maybe even make RB realize that past laurels aside, he has now created an avid and passionate fanbase that wants more which would ideally force him to make the changes that will deliver the Title (I know i am contradicting myself here, but its a possibility).

I look at Kentucky, where they let go of Tubby, who took them to the NCAA’s every single year. But their desire for a title pushed them to make the risky move and let go of him and then go after Gillespie and then Calipari. They dont have a title yet, but their desire for one is so great, that they are willing to take the risk. As a Bball fanbase, Texas I believe is not quite there yet.

by sunnyweatherfan on Mar 20, 2010 3:44 PM CDT reply actions  

If a #8 seed, tourney appearance, and winning season are the floor for UT basketball...

…then Barnes is all the coach UT needs. Mack Brown had a down season here or there before and after (2007) winning the national title, but there have been two near-title seasons in the past two years, so people kind of forget. Barnes is dealing with a sport with much higher roster turnover and, at the same time, much more impact from each roster turnover that happens, since fewer players are involved in the game. With the amazing young talent, probably no one leaving early for the draft this year, and more incoming talent, I think UT’s going to be looking pretty good in 2010-2011, and people are going to forget a little bit of their criticism of Barnes this year.

Boycott Facebook. It's lame. Inform your real friends that you're going to communicate with them like a normal human being, and then delete your account. Seriously.

by burntorangehorn on Mar 20, 2010 3:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Up or Out List
I’m not saying I’ve concluded that Barnes is a permanent answer; as I explained in last night’s post, perhaps the best thing we might do is begin to think seriously about how to evaluate the job Barnes does over the coming couple of years. The single best thing we can do to help ourselves evaluate and make meaningful decisions about Barnes down the line, is to think through and articulate — now, ahead of time — what specifically we hope/want to see from him heading forward. Considering the odds facing any and every team, winning the national title may not be the best standard to make our determinations. A title-less season may or may not provide reason to be discouraged about the future; more helpful would be to have thought about what, specifically, are those things we want to see from Barnes and the program, irrespective of whether the team cuts down any nets.

I’ve begun thinking about what I expect Rick Barnes to do on the other side of this season — things that I think can help provide a meaningful basis for making a decision as important and consequential as keep-him-or-cut-him.

Fair enough. Here are my contributions to The List of things RB should work on:

1. Technically Weak on Offense. In watching Texas BB, I’m struck by the consistent lack of BB fundamentals on offense (e.g., streetball over team-play, poor free-throw shooting, missed lay-ups, turnovers, etc.). It’s great that RB stresses defense, but having an efficient offense that doesn’t turn the ball over prevents points off turnovers and transition buckets, energizes the team to play defense, and puts a lot of pressure on the other team to score.

2. Poor Team Chemistry. Yes, we had lots of prima donnas this year and one glaring one last year (Abrams), but I can’t help but think that RB’s stubborn “my way or the highway”/ “the guys don’t get it” / they’re not listening to me" attitude sets the tone for the lack of selfless buy-in that I haven’t seen in a Texas team since at least 05-06 (PJ, Aldridge, Aldridge, Paulino, Buckman) or maybe even 02-03 (TJ, Mouton, Royal, Thomas, Buckman). These days, Texas BB is characterized by a bunch of individuals who don’t blend together. I agree that RB "has got to accept an appropriate amount of responsibility when his team fails and he has got to give us something better than the indifferent and ambiguous "we’re trying to hopefully one day be the best we can be, get in the tournament, hopefully, and we can play for it."

3. Fade Down the Stretch. I agree that Texas teams of late seem to start off strong, playing hellacious defense, only to wind down the stretch completely lost on offense, unable to guard any kind of offensive set, and showing absolutely zero basketball IQ. This trend speaks more to RB’s coaching that to the players.

by UT.DC on Mar 20, 2010 6:23 PM CDT reply actions  

The Barnes Era is Also Memorable For...

…having players that have left early for the NBA. It’s probably because we never had that kind of talent before. It seems as though we’d lose somebody and then the next year be deficient in the area that they specialized in (PJ Tucker comes to mind who’s ripping up the Ukrainian League).

Imagine the team strength had TJ, PJ, Augustin, Aldridge, Durant, Gibson or Mihm stayed another year or more. I know; it’s wishful thinking and probably misplaced lament.

I suppose that some programs can overcome losing “one and done” guys. I’m not sure that’s in our best interest anymore.

by DreadedOne on Mar 20, 2010 7:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Some Examples This Year

of blue collar, 4 yr guys that seem to be having success – Cornell, St Marys, No. Iowa, etc. But there are plenty of examples too of schools who have success with one and done guys. Don’t know what the answer is but it is an interesting question.

by gcinthewoods on Mar 21, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

SWEET 16 BABY!

I still need some shoes and socks for basketball Caradoc if you can help me. Did you read my post on the BU/UT big12 champ game. I’m only 14, but I love Duke and Baylor and would relish a Duke/BU matchup. I don’t even know who I would be for. My stepdaddy went to Baylor, but he abuses me a lot so I have to quiet when I post. After I read my Bible every night I cry myself to sleep but I wake up and feel better.

by NCBear on Mar 20, 2010 7:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Barnes/ Baylor's coach

What if Texas had Baylor’s coach this year? Would things have been different?

by Longhorns84 on Mar 20, 2010 11:07 PM CDT reply actions  

The problem I have with Barnes is almost purely his offense

He has none. He doesn’t run plays to get his shooters open. He doesn’t feed the right people the ball and he benches people who need the most experience. He brought us here, but now I think it’s probably better to find a coach that’s able to understand how to get his players to play properly as a team.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Mar 21, 2010 10:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.
Start posting about the Longhorns »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +14 updates

QB Jeremiah Masoli Headed To Ole Miss After Being Dismissed From Oregon

Photo

With Apologies To Randy Edsall, The Big East Remains Mostly Harmless

FILE -- This is an Oct. 18, 2008 file photo showing Connecticut corner back Jasper Howard (6) trying to get the crowd into the game during the fourth quarter of an NCAA college football game against Rutgers, in Piscataway, N.J.   Jasper Howard had his little sisters' names tatooed on his chest. His friends say it was a constant reminder of why he was at U Conn _ to provide his family with a better life than the one he had in Miami's Little Haiti. (AP Photo/Mel Evans, File) link

In Defense Of Big East Football

More from SBNation.com >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small GhostofBigRoy

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

Learned_hand_better_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn