NCAA on verge of 68-team men's tournament
I am truly shocked!
about 2 years ago
R00T4UT
7 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
If a 16th seed has never so much as even gotten out of the first round
what makes the NCAA they need to include teams even lower than that in the tourney? I seriously don’t understand why expansion even needs to happen at all.
by ElMariachiLoco on Apr 22, 2010 12:34 PM CDT reply actions
hell..
…i’ll take this over the 96! they were talking about
by vy til i die on Apr 22, 2010 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions
This is a good thing
The extra 3 teams is silly — as silly as the 65th — but we are spared the ruin of the tourney with 96 teams. And the Turner contract gets every game televised.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Yeah, 65 is as silly as 68. 64 was perfectly fine.
You’re right. Just glad it’s not 96. That’d be just plain ridiculous.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
