Offseason Ruminations - Quickness versus Speed in the Texas Wide Receivers
It's officially the off-season, and just like any good steer, Longhorn fans are left to wander off to the shade and ruminate on things that were and things the might yet be. In the interest of making the first belch, I thought I would visit the issue of the new offense and Texas' current crop of frustrating wide receivers.
via farm4.static.flickr.com - There's nothing like an off-season rumination party for Longhorn fans
The story begins back In 2008 (seems like a long time ago already), the Texas Longhorns produced their own lethal version of the spread offense built on the short-intermediate passing accuracy of Colt McCoy and the football IQ and sticky hands of two of the Horns' most prolific receivers in history: Quan Cosby and Jordan Shipley. In 2008 they became the first pair of wide receivers to surpass 1000 yards receiving in the same season, and they helped Colt McCoy to a single-season NCAA record for pass completion percentage. This flood of success was based on something called the "two-man passing game," (for more details, see Chris Brown's pre-season article from his ‘Smart Football' blog) in which McCoy and his receivers would read the defense, and the receivers would choose the "option" of different possible routes that would best exploit the coverage and force defenders to leave someone open. With McCoy, Cosby, Shipley, and as the season wore on, Brandon Collins, on the same page in reading the defense on virtually every play, the Longhorns sliced and diced opponents like ripe mangoes most of the year, culminating in the impromptu go route by Cosby against the blitzing Buckeyes to which Colt delivered a perfect zinger with just 16 seconds left to win the Fiesta Bowl.
Both Cosby and Shipley found success in 2008 by routinely beating safeties and linebackers to spots with their quickness. Once frustrated defenders began anticipating which "options" Texas receivers would choose and jumping routes, Cosby and Shipley would bait the defenders into jumping the simple inside or outside cuts of the normal routes and then, with what's called a double move, quickly cut opposite to the direction of the closing defender into open spaces for big gains and touchdowns. Perhaps Shipley's finest game was the Masumoto knife-filleting of Oklahoma in which he beat linebackers and safeties to a spot on several consecutive plays, and then burned them for a big play on a double move. Shipley further became "the man" in 2009 with his signature crossing routes and more double moves.
The result? Without a doubt, the most effective passing offense in the history of UT.
But wait, this article is about ruminating, not remembering, and so you ask, "Why bring up Cosby and Shipley at all?" The answer is, because Texas' new "downhill, under center" offense may be as much about featuring its stable of wide receivers as it is about getting one of the posse of running backs going. More specifically, the peculiar athletic skills of Cosby and Shipley - not overwhelming straight line speed, but instead scintillating quickness and ridiculously good hands - are missing from the receivers left behind. Their skill set, in the form of the legs of James Kirkendoll, Malcolm Williams, John Chiles, and Marquise Goodwin, is mostly about straight line speed and not so much about quickness.
Speed...quickness...what's the difference? After the jump, I explore the consequences of one versus the other and how this will impact the Horns' offense in 2010.
Much ink has been pressed as to Texas' new emphasis on the running game and putting new QB Garrett Gilbert under center to allow the running backs to start 7 yards deep in the backfield with either side of the field in which to run. While this, coupled with an increase in the use of man-to-man blocking schemes, may very well help the running game, I'll argue that it may very well help the passing game and in particular, the wide receivers.
Fans undoubtedly were frustrated in 2009 at the occasionally sputtering offense, particularly in games against Oklahoma and Nebraska, in which seeming waves of defensive backs jumped the favorite short routes of the "two-man" game, leaving McCoy as the piñata for Gerald McCoy, Jeremy Beal, and Ndamukong Suh's personal backfield birthday parties. The blogosphere lit up with the question, "What's wrong with Colt?" A better question would have been, what's wrong with the UT receivers?
The two-man game depends on receivers making very quick, well-timed cuts into open areas between defensive backs and linebackers. In 2008, this scheme was difficult to stop because Texas' 3 top receivers were quicker rather than faster, and defenders couldn't focus on just one receiver. As far as speed goes, think about how disappointed fans were in Cosby and Shipley's 40 yard dash times (4.65 seconds for each of them) at the NFL combine, but think how many times each would juke defenders into more awkward positions than the game of Twister.
In 2009, the starters were Shipley, Williams, Chiles, Kirkendoll, and later in the season Marquise Goodwin. Defenses focused on Shipley, and for OU and NU, had the athletes that could stay with Williams, Chiles, and Kirkendoll in the short passing game. Why? Those three are fast, but not exceptionally quick. The "Man Child" Malcolm Williams is 6'3", 225 and has a quick first step and tremendous speed for a man his size, but I've never seen him make a quick cut like Shipley, and he has trouble finding the ball when it's thrown before his break. John "the Child" Chiles, even as a QB, never showed much in the way of potential break-dancing moves, and, except against the glacier-footed Wyoming Cowboys and UTEP Miners, was rarely able to get separation from defenders all season. Similarly, "Captain Kirk" Kirkendoll looked great against some inferior teams, but was virtually shut down by the more athletic secondaries of OU and Nebraska. Even Marquise Goodwin struggled in breaking off crossing and slant routes. Couple the inability to separate with the viral pass-catching disease known as "manos de piedra" (hands of stone), and the signature two-man game of 2008 dissolved into a "just throw it to Jordan" game that still almost won a national championship.
Faced with a quartet of blazing fast but mostly wiggle-less receivers, it seems that Greg Davis, armed with his new toy, the amazing Garrett Gilbert, has shifted his offensive philosophy away from a spread formation and short passing game into a play-action centered intermediate - vertical passing game. This accomplishes several things. First, Gilbert has relatively fewer reads, i.e., pass plays, to make, which presumably will help him minimize mistakes. Second, the vertical threat on either side of the field in the form of Goodwin, Chiles, and/or Williams, along with the ability of Gilbert to deliver high velocity balls and hit go routes or skinny posts between the corners and safeties, should keep two safeties back without having to deploy four wide receivers. Instead, the EBS (aka Greg Smith) and/or Barrett Matthews can exploit good blocking angles and/or potential double teams along the line without a safety being able to fill the holes. Coupled with a deeper set-up in the backfield, all these changes should help the running game. But perhaps as much as anything else, the new offense allows the Texas receivers to exploit what they do best, which is flat out run and see the ball before they catch it, rather than what they don't, which is to try to make clumsy slow cuts and quick snatches of the ball in a timed passing game.
This is not to say that Texas can't go to the spread if they need to. In the spring game, DeSean Hales showed why he was such a dynamic player in high school, as he repeatedly turned short release routes into catches and first downs. The true freshman Mike Davis also seems to have that explosive quickness, and he may very well work his way into some spread packages by mid-season. Although it may require substitution and thus prevent employment in a jet tempo or hurry-up offense, the Horns have considerable flexibility in their deployment of receivers that could keep defenders off balance. Barrett Matthews may be a key to this flexibility, as he seems to have enough speed to be effective as a flex TE, and enough toughness and bulk to serve as a regular TE or H-back. If so, Texas could quickly shift from 1 back 2 TE, 2 back 1 TE to 4 WR sets, with Gilbert under center or in the spread as needed. We already know that Gilbert is comfortable throwing the football in either formation, and this flexibility allows Texas to use relatively few but very different formations (another Greg Davis trademark) and even incorporate motion before the snap (Matthews as H-back).
Regardless, Greg Davis appears to see what he has, rather than what he wants to see, at the wide receiver position. By switching to more pro-style sets, he places the likely starting receivers in a much better position to excel. Obviously the success of this plan hinges on the success of the running game - play-action and vertical routes don't mean much on 3rd and 11. If the running game fails, at least from a consistency standpoint, yet again this year, look for Mike Davis and DeSean Hales to begin to replace "Captain Kirk" and "the Child" in the spread on the basis of their superior quickness in running option routes and the "two-man game."
Texas has not succeeded in having more than one offensive identity in a season during the Mack Brown era, and frankly has struggled to run the ball efficiently and consistently since Ricky Williams left (with the exception of Cedric Benson's senior year (2004) when defenses were forced to devote extra defenders to Vince Young). The switch to a power running - playaction passing game all sounds great and seems to mesh with Texas' current talent, but it remains to be seen whether such an offense becomes the team's identity or whether they end up regressing to a spread offensive team by the end of the year.
34 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I picked Goodwin. I want to believe that Malcolm can put it all together but still have some doubt.
Goodwin can flat out play.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
I picked Kirk for the same reason
I wish MW could do it, but I really don’t think he can. Kirk’s the wily type I think could be the next step, although MG certainly has more momentum coming out of the BCSCG. Williams puts more balls on the ground than the wake-up rounds at a nursing home.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on May 18, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
love the idea, hate the probable reality
the one that likes the x’s and o’s employed by greg davis
but hates the way he uses them/when/and with who
i can already envision the opposite, shifting to a spread style with malcolm and chiles
and then deep patterns and play actions for the younger guys
furthermore i can already see the reasoning: the younger guys will be able to absorb less so we need to keep it simple for them
while the older guys have already had 2-3 years running this offense so they’ll be better suited for it
paint me cynically optimistic with high hopes of being proven completely wrong
Your post reads like some crazy poetry, man.
Try some punctuation next time, maybe?
you can't even imagine
the complexity and thought that the poor guy put into the syllable patterns
by LonghornHoosier on May 18, 2010 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions
"paint me cynically optimistic"
Is that something like blue? We only have blue.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on May 18, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions
I have to disagree with your statement that UT has struggled to run the ball effectively since Ricky. VY for instance ran the ball very well. It doesn’t matter that he was the QB. We could pick up the yards on the ground when we needed them. We actually rushed the ball better the year after Benson graduated thanks to VY, JC, and Ramonce.
We continued to run the ball well until JC left. I really wish he would have stayed one more year.
Year – leader (team)
2001 – Benson 1053 yards/4.7 ypc (team: 2114 yards / 4.1 ypc)
2002 – Benson 1293 / 4.2 (team: 1762 / 3.4)
2003 – Benson 1360 / 5.3 (team: 3023 / 5.1)
2004 – Benson 1834 / 5.6 (team: 3590 / 5.8)
2005 – Vince 1050 / 6.8 (team: 3866 / 5.9)
2006 – Jamaal 831 / 5.3 (team: 2374 / 4.4)
2007 – Jamaal 1619 / 6.3 (team: 2698 / 5.0)
2008 – McCoy 561 / 4.1 (team: 2177 / 4.3)
2009 – Newton 552 / 4.8 (team: 2066 / 4.0)
A reasonable point
but my point was about running the ball to the TB. The benchmark for a strong running game in college is 5 ypc because there should be many long runs and with consistency, few enough negative or < 2 yard runs to pull the average below 5. And even those statistics can lie – Jamaal Charles’ big year of 2007 featured a 5 ypc average, but the rushing attack was atrociously inconsistent, and that average was driven mainly by 2 games, Nebraska and Oklahoma State, in which Charles “went off” in the fourth quarters of both games. The Horns haven’t rushed for 3000 yards in a season in any year other than 2003-2005 (the VY years), and the ypc average for 2001 – 2002 plus 2006 – 2009 is 4.2, well below the collegiate standard for rushing consistency.
My point was merely to warn that Texas has not consistently run the ball out of the I-formation since Ricky graduated, and it may be a pipe dream to imagine that Texas can use a power rushing attack as its core offense as Alabama did last year (and likely will again).
I see the approach as trying to keep defenses guessing and exploiting matchups unique to each game as far as how much power running vs spread the Horns use.
by burnt in ny on May 18, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions
Our TBs hit 5 ypc in 03, 04, 05 (Ramonce and JC averaged 6.8 and 7.4 ypc and combined for ~1400 yards), 06 (although we didn’t rely on the running game as much) and 07. That is 5 of the 7 years before JC left. Even by the measuring stick of 5 ypc, we were able to get the yards on the ground when we pounded the ball.
JC – actually, that is not true. He averaged 5.0+ ypc in 9 of 13 games that year. Yes, he did go off against Neb (290) and OSU (180) and pretty much win those games for us. However, his performances against TCU (134), UCF (153), TTech (174), and ASU (161) were also very impressive and dominating.
I agree about the I. We haven’t done that in a while so it makes me a little nervous. I too have a feeling we’ll still be seeing quite a bit of the spread still, which is not a bad thing. It has done well for us. As long as our WRs can step up, I think we’ll be OK.
I don’t know that Chiles will be the best WR next year, but I think he will make a big step forward. He has a lot of altheticism and he should be faster thanks to the weight loss. Having a 2nd year of practice at the position should be huge. It usually takes WRs 3 years to transition from college to the NFL when they have been playing WR all their lives. I would expect that it’d at least take a couple of years for a kid in college to switch to the position after playing QB most of his life.
For a true barometer for our fears about the running game this year
You really have to look at what it looked like during the Applewhite/Simms years. That is the style of offense that UT is supposed to be moving towards this year. Without Ricky Williams, the running game was never great or consisent.
My biggest fear is that the offense looks like what we saw with Mock as the starter in 2003. Take a look at Benson’s numbers with Mock and then when VY became the starter.
by Horncasting on May 18, 2010 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd rather have a 2009 rushing offense with 2009 team results...
…than anything UT experience under Major and Simms. Not one BCS bowl, let alone a conference championship or BCSCG bid.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on May 18, 2010 8:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I read somewhere that YPC was not a good stat for running backs.
You want something to tell you what you can gain consistently. So something like standard deviation of yardage gained per carry or something would be useful there.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on May 18, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Consistenly gaining 5 ypc (so a low Stdev) isn’t necessarilly a good thing, or maybe a better way to say it is that it isn’t necessarilly better 5ypc with a high stdev. Many (most I would say) good RBs start off getting 2-4 yards a carry during a game. That wears down a D. You set yourself up for big plays that lead to scores later on.
Look at Johnson and the Titans. A lot of what makes him so great is his big play potential. Ricky was the same(and is once again becoming that way in Miami).
This may be just a preference, but I would take running back A who gets 5 ypc +/- 1 yard over running back B who gets 5ypc +/- 5 yards. Give the ball to running back A on three consecutive plays and he almost certainly gets a first down. Running back B? Not necessarily. The idea that you get big plays is relevant too, but running back A never stops a drive.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on May 18, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions
I think Barry Sanders was probably the ultimate example of that in my lifetime
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on May 18, 2010 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions
running the ball is half play calling
yeah, everybody knows about the play action for the deep pass, but draw plays and counters at the right time chew up ground and get TDs. i have faith that Greg Davis will get us yards on the ground and points on the board. he catches a lot of hell, but he normally calls an excellent game and gets us loads of points. i just want a TE in the game. i don’t care if we have a 3 wide or a 2 with a FB or HBack. just keep Matthews in the game. that kid is a maniacal blocker and an excellent pass catcher. i’m excited about the new offense. hookem!
"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.
by drankthewine on May 18, 2010 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Vertical Threat.
I hope that Greg Davis utilizes this more this season. You mention we have fast, but not quick, WRs. This situation is begging for us to use Gilbert’s arm like a Howitzer, shooting deep into enemy territory. Goodwin and Williams both possess the ability to get behind the defense if asked to, and Gilbert can get the ball there with not a lot of air underneath it. If the three of them are used properly, I see no reason why sometime in the next 2 years, we’ll be talking about the Gilbert-led Texas offense as the best passing offense on the 40 acres.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on May 18, 2010 10:53 AM CDT reply actions
On Greg Davis.
Playing the short passing game we played the last two seasons had as much to do with Colt’s ability to place the ball wherever he wanted with absurd accuracy (and conversely, his inability to get the ball past 25 or so yards without lofting it) as it did with our WR corps. One thing Greg Davis has proved he knows how to do better than just about anyone else in the country is fit a scheme for his QB. I expect to see our offense tailored to GIlbert’s strength — his cannon of an arm (THP – 97).
I fully expect, however, for Greg Davis to lose his mind at least once next season (over/under on twice?) and relapse into: bubble screen, bubble screen, HB plunge, punt for an entire half.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on May 18, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
This flood of success was based on something called the “two-man passing game,” (for more details, see Chris Brown’s pre-season article from his ‘Smart Football’ blog) in which McCoy and his receivers would read the defense, and the receivers would choose the “option” of different possible routes that would best exploit the coverage and force defenders to leave someone open.
Actually, option routes are more a staple of a run-n-shoot scheme, not a WCO-style offense, which is what texas’ passing game is based on. I’m familiar with the Smart Football article you referenced, and I’m not sure how you went from the two-man concept, which texas runs the hell out of, to option routes, which Chris Brown doesn’t address, rightly, because texas doesn’t run them in their concept. The WRs don’t read the DB then choose one of three options, which is what they do in an option route concept, they simply run their route and then turn to one side or the other, with the QB finding the open man.
The big problem with your passing game last season wasn’t so much a lack of quickness from the WRs, it was a complete lack of a TE, due to injuries, an issue that has hurt your passing game for the last two years. In 2008, Shipley was able to move to the inside position and run the inside routes, which is why y’all shredded OU (their decision to keep putting LBs and Safeties on him helped, too). Barrett Matthews is going to be huge for y’all this season as a TE; I expect David Thomas-like numbers out of him, because he is tailor-made for Davis’ scheme, especially the two-man concept in 11 personnel.
I believe Davis also wants to feature more 12 and 21 personnel this year in an attempt to help the offensive line in their run blocking. I believe this may backfire, though, because Davis’ attempt to “be simple, look complicated” will become too simple in 2010; I think texas will almost always run from 12 personnel groupings, for instance, while passing when in 11 personnel. If you find another TE to complement Matthews as a receiver, this won’t be an issue.
One of the reasons Nebraska and Alabama were so successful in stopping texas’ offense is because they had so little respect for texas’ running game, they were able to play the game in their base dime package, trading out two LBs for two DBs, which gave them two more people to cover texas’ receivers with. As much as anything else, the move to 21 and 12 personnel in 2010 is to avoid that scenario repeating itself.
appreciate your comments
I agree about using QB under center formations to try to develop respect for the running game and keeping dime packages off the field.
I stand by my quickness vs speed idea though because even against Oklahoma, which did not go with a dime package, Williams, Kirkendoll and Chiles could not get separation on the two-man routes. Williams and Chiles especially had trouble reacting to the ball even when open, which explained a lot of their drops.
As far as “option” routes, we once again run into labeling issues. The Texas players and coaches routinely talk about adjusting routes on a play-by-play basis, and Cosby’s winning TD against tOSU stands as a classic case. While it may not be an official and consistent option route offense, it’s a term that captures what the receivers are doing for the average BON reader.
But again – thanks for your comments – I always look forward to your knowledge of schemes and formations.
by burnt in ny on May 18, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
There are so many angles you could take on this issue . . .
Tons of potential posts. Two or three occurred to me as I worked my way through all that precedes this. Great stuff, NY, and Beergut’s comments are spot-on, and the charts make some valid points.
As we put days and months between the McCoy Era and what’s ahead, I’ve become more convinced that Mack/GDavis tailored the offense to fit McCoy’s comfort zone. Don’t know why, and I doubt Colt does either, but he simply was more comfortable — thus more effective — in the spread than under center. Because the offense was built around McCoy the last two seasons, the coaching decisions (maybe not the ones they preferred, but the ones they felt compelled to make) worked against the development and effectiveness of the running game.
I picked Malcolm in the poll, on the theory that he has the best combination of skill and experience among the receivers. On a physical level, he’s bigger than most corners and faster than most safeties. He’s also at the point where he can sniff those NFL dollars.
One final point: We all know Colt played favorites. That aspect of his game always bugged me. Sure, against OU and in tight games, he needed to find his favorite WR. But he did the same thing against the UTEPs and Central Floridas; those were chances to develop Williams, Goodwin, Chiles — in that area, Colt (and the play calling) failed.
I picked Darius White in the poll
just on the theory that he’s going to be the one at the other end of all of those WR screens Gilbert will throw this year as Davis works to get him as many completions early on in the season to build his confidence. Knock it if you want, but the WR screen is a safe play and safe completion, and is normally good for 5-8 yards when executed properly, i.e. the read is correct, and the secondary is playing off the WRs. Davis uses this play as an early security blanket for his QBs to build up their confidence, and it works, judging by his success developing QBs.
Of course, I also thought Dan Buckner would be used and developed in much the same manner as I am now predicting White will, and that simply didn’t happen.
burnt,
Bringing up Oklahoma is a valid point re: personnel being used to stop the passing game, but I tihnk the issue there was failure by the offensive line to keep the opposing pass rush off of McCoy more often than it was WRs not getting separation. I’m going completely off of memory, though, and not game film, so I could be completely wrong on that issue.
Williams is somewhat of an enigma to me; I watched him a lot in high school, and think one of these days he is going to wake up, realize he can be awesome, and we’re all going to be in trouble. As for Chiles, I think an issue with him may be struggling to get off the LOS. His only success seems to come on the WR screen, where someone else is blocking so he can get loose from coverage. Of course, it seemed like the only time McCoy threw to Chiles was on the WR screen, so that may have simply been a function of playcalling by the coaches more than a question of ability with Chiles.
White is on another level from Buckner in terms of athleticism
I agree that White can be successful in the screen game because of his elite ability to change direction for someone as big as he is — it’s also why he was so effective as a punt returner in high school. However, White will most likely be playing the X position, where he’s more likely to be catching hitches — he can certainly turn those into big plays the same way he could in the screen game. I think White will also serve as a deep threat if he gets on the field, but his route running is extremely raw, so that could hold him back. Eventually, I think that White is really going to be a stud.
Mike Davis is a much better route runner and will likely end up at flanker, so he could be a better candidate to catch screens and see early playing time. He is more ready to contribute early, but needs to stop carrying the football like a loaf of bread aka Neon Deion.
The offense line certainly was terrible against Oklahoma, but the receivers didn’t help out much. If you recall, the coaches made some changes in the starting lineup after that game, moving Shipley to the slot, Kirkendoll outside (benched for a couple games), inserting Williams at split end and moving Chiles to the bench. Pretty damning if you ask me. The lack of separation why also why Goodwin was in the game late — his quickness allowed him to get that step that the other receivers weren’t able to.
Chiles has been making strides with his explosiveness this spring as he has lost weight and adjusted to the position, so he should be in a better position to contribute. He also seems to have better chemistry with Gilbert, who is willing to target him more often. McCoy simply felt more comfortable with the other receivers and there may have been some other stuff behind the scenes going on with them that we don’t know about.
As for Williams, it all keeps coming back to his hands. Gilbert is going to have a hard time trusting him in big situations if he’s going to continue dropping passes. Seeing him on the practice field, even with all the other great athletes at Texas, it’s amazing how big he is and how well he moves for someone of that size. I was firmly on his bandwagon last year, but seeing him fight the ball in the national championship game and then some in spring practice as well made me wonder if he is ever going to be able to hold onto the football in key situations. Terrell Owens was able to overcome his poor hands somewhat and from all indications Williams works hard at it, but I’m starting to lose my optimism with him.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on May 18, 2010 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Maybe I'm borrowing trouble here, but...
…even with all this talk of Texas’ re-tooled offense, I would bet all the money in my bank account that our first play from scrimmage come September 4 is a wide receiver screen. God, I hope I’m wrong, but if I see it, I’m going to be mighty disappointed.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
I would view that playcall as a positive thing
it would mean Davis is bringing Gilbert along just as he has many other QBs
Was just bragging on BON
And I log in to find a well done article, long on facts, short on axe grinding bile.
I will toss in a few comments/observations of my own.
What impressed me about Hales in the spring game was not the run after catch, face it, against backups and walk ons but rather the catches themselves. None of them easy by any means.
GG looked amazingly comfortable out there. He needs to stay upright cuz his backups won’t cut it.
But the player that will make this offense go the most (IMHO) is Barrett Matthews. He played very well in the “security blanket” role for GG and against the 1’s.
If he emerges as a real TE (can catch and block), this offense has a real chance to sizzle.
I also don’t believe the run game will need to be Ricky good, it just needs to be effective enough to make play action a real threat. I also think you see a good deal of DJ (if grades allow) and Goodwin on reverses and misdirection plays.
My vote was Malcom Williams, this offense really fits his skill sets.
I see Mike Davis emerging quickly and believe the balance of the new WRs should redshirt.
Good article with some nice follow up.
With Williams, Goodwin, and Monroe on the field
Is there anyone that can match up with our straight line speed?
Couple that with GG’s arm strength, and to me this PA pass game is obvious.
Then we’ve got Barrett Matthews who might actually be a real TE for the first time in years.
We could have a more productive offense than last year. No offense to the Colt/Shipley connection.
How Do You Spell Traylon Shead?
I see him as being a huge factor even this year in the passing game. I would love to see this kid come in and run underneath routes with Williams, Goodwin, and company stretching the defense. I really hope to see Shead get some serious looks this fall.

by 

































