Realignment Winners & Losers & The Texas Trinity
Really great article by Scipio Tex over at Barking Carnival. I don't really have much commentary so this is more of a fanshot post, but I know people don't really scroll down there, so I posted it as a fanpost for discussion. A couple of my favorite excerpts after the jump.
Most crucially, Longhorns, Inc now has smooth sailing to establishing its prized baby – the Longhorn television network, and has assured itself of its full slice of the revenue pie. Now matter where we go now, the new arrangement must accommodate our television rights.
I think this is the biggest deal for the Horns. They expect (hope?) that a Pac-16 or Big-16 deal will still be there in 3-5 years. They also expect that the BEVO-D Longhorn network will be up, running, and flourishing in that time and keeping such a revenue-positive network will be a prerequisite to any new conference affiliation. Those are two huge calculated gambles, and they better pay off in the Horns' favor.
Similarly, the notion that an undefeated Texas will always get picked to play for a MNC with a SOS around 50 is laughable and proof that the Top 10% rules are really churning out dumber graduates from my alma mater. Or that if picked, we’re adequately prepared after playing a slate of stroke victims. You’re the kind of person that likely gets an ego swell from defeating your seven year old niece in arm wrestling.
It's not impossible; Texas already has the brand name cache. See USC. Mack (or Muschamp) will need to step up the non-con schedule with at least one "marquee" game--Ole Miss and Minnesota ain't gonna cut it. See USC vs. Notre Dame. In this regard, OU already has a step up, as they're willing to schedule the Miami's of the world. Draw television eyes, point to a marginal top 25 ranking, without any real danger of consistently losing the non-con's. Step two of scheduling roulette: it will be imperative to schedule a big name during conference championship week (CCW). Our two biggest draws are already locked in to early October and Thanksgiving night. I imagine Bedlam will shift to CCW. That leaves only one suitable option: Texas Tech.
The school had a chance to build academic partnerships, collaborate in research, shake down the Feds for research grants, and establish visiting professorships with academic equals and superiors like Cal, UCLA, Washington, and Stanford. If you’re an engineer, you should be weeping right now. Hard science, the humanities, the arts – they would have all prospered under this arrangement and our academic brand would have grown materially and perceptually.
This has obviously been discussed ad naseum here by minds greater than I, but it's worth pointing out again: if the Texas legislature is not going to look out for the best interests of UT-Austin, you would at least think our university leadership would.
This is supposed to be fun. Seriously. Fun. And interesting. We’ve now lost the two best road venues in the league and the 10 team full conference slate now assures us of frequent visits to some of the most depressing venues in the Corn Belt.
[...]
Explain to me exactly what this current move did for Longhorn fans? Fans. Me? You? Us? Not Longhorns, Inc.
Seriously, as a straight-up fan, this is beyond depressing. The Pac-16 represented the dream scenario--awesome road venues, smokin' hot chicks, an exciting brand of football, and enough winnable games to pave a relatively easy road to the BCS. The ex-Big 12 is like the going to mom's house for Christmas in Podunk, Nowhere. Sure, she cooks good food and everything is familiar. You may even score with your ex-BFFL that lived next door. But it sure ain't sexy or exciting.
Yes, they were trying to date you to meet us. Sorry.
Hah!
We punted. Don’t worry. Its not over. We’ll be discussing this again when we get our ball(s) back.
One can only hope Texas will still be in that power position. It's all on you, Mack and Muschamp. Make it happen.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm not too worried about Strength of Schedule
But I do think it’s imperitive that we schedule one marquis OOC game.
Cal, Ole Miss, UCLA… those are good picks from premier conferences. Even Minnesota does the trick.
But that will give us 10 games against BCS teams, and then a game against Rice and UTEP or whatever. I think we would end up with a SoS that was above the 50 mark, and wouldn’t be exposing ourselves to much risk.
SoS
The computer portion that will account for SoS is (to an extent) out of the Longhorns’ hands. It will be dependent on how well any given team does in a given year (i.e., 2009, we couldn’t expect Arkansas to completely suck and for Cincinnati to win the Big East championship).
What does matter is public perception—i.e., it looks good to the voters and it draws the eyes of the general public when USC beats Notre Dame or when OU beats Miami.
The Pac-16 represented the dream scenario—awesome road venues, smokin’ hot chicks
Awesome? Rainy NW, bullshit SoCal and Phoenix? Tucson, maybe.
Plus, Texas women > California girls, any day of the week.
this isn't even debatable
Option 1:
- Palo Alto
- Berkeley
- Seattle
- Eugene
- Boulder
- Tucson
- Phoenix
- L.A.
- Corvallis
- Pullman
Option 2:
- Lawrence
- Columbia
- Manhattan
- Ames
- Waco
Tell me again which group is bullshit and which is awesome?
I'm not sober.
by white rob on Jun 17, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, that still stings.
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Jun 17, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Bro why do you have to keep putting the salt on my wounds!
I have to hear all the Bulshit here on the west coast about how Texas is a bunch of Pussys who were to scared to join the Pac 10 so they can continue with there cupcake schedule and play high school teams like Baylor, Iowa St. ETC. I was so looking forward to going to a Cal or Stanford game decked out in my UT Road gear dumping Beer on my buddies after we kicked the living SHit out of these Pussy Schools out here
I'm not your bro, friend.
At least you have UCLA and Cal on the horizon. And whatever happened to the talk of a USC home-and-home 8 or 10 years from now? Did that officially get done?
I'm not sober.
pussy schools?
how’d it go last time we played a football game?
It was already pretty difficult to make the claim that the Big XII was better than the Pac-10 top to bottom. Now its even more difficult. Texas and Oklahoma are very good programs, but, truth is, you don’t have a whole lot after that. Playing Iowa State, Baylor, Kansas, and A&M every year isn’t exactly difficult stuff.
I’m not going to sit here and say that the Pac-10 is the best conference in all the land or anything like that, but to call us pussy schools while you play your toughest road games in Stillwater and Lubbock is pretty bad.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by David Piper on Jun 17, 2010 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Your right, Iowa St, Baylor, are cupcakes. I was all for the alliance
Don’t get your panties in a wad bro, develop a thicker skin. I have to listen to the bulshit every week about how Texas and the Big XII sucks and are the worst Conference in the land. The Pussy comment is just called Shit talking take a couple tylenol and get over it
Bro I dont even know where to go with that comment
the only shaggin I do is between the sheets with the Mrs.
Is there another Def of Shag
Texas VS The PAC
UT VS AZ 1-0
UT VS AZ ST 1-0
UT VS CAL 0-2
UT VS OREGON 4-1
UT VS OR ST 2-0
UT VS STANFORD 2-2
UT VS UCLA 2-2
UT VS USC 1-4
UT VS WASH 3-1
UT VS WA ST 2-1
After I acquiesced to the Pac-16 idea
I started really looking forward to the road game destinations.
It's a Horns' world. Even Aggies play hoops with a burnt orange ball.

by 
































