The Big Roundup - The last look at the Big 12-2 Media Days
36 days (give or take a few hours).
Garrett Gilbert talks about his growth as a player.
We're Texas. The Horns still have that swagger.
Transition year? For Texas? Child, please.
"I don't like that word," Mack Brown said Wednesday, "because it gives the kids and the coaches an excuse not to be as good."
Texas doesn't do transition years. Texas has lost three games in the last 1,026 days and has won at least 10 games for nine straight years.
Reload. Right, Coach?
"What we're trying to do is sell the kids on you've got to win every game," Brown said. "That's who we are and what we want to be."
The Texas coaching staff conducted a study.
Brown said Texas conducted studies that showed "we had more explosive plays when the quarterback was under the center as well as the tailback being right behind the quarterback."
But it all hinges on what happens up front. If the line performs the way Texas needs, the Longhorns have a chance to make the ground game work regardless of who lines up at tailback.
The Longhorns need to spruce up the running game.
Mack Brown thinks defenses are starting to catch up to the spread offense.
He’s noticed how much his defense has struggled against powerful, traditional running teams in bowl games.
And with a young quarterback replacing Colt McCoy, the Longhorns probably shouldn’t throw as much as they have been anyway.
Brown stacked it all up and came to a simple conclusion: Texas needs to spruce up its running game.
Mack Brown isn't going anywhere soon.
"The agreement we had is I would stay as long as I wanted to," Brown said. "I would be in total control while I stayed. [Muschamp] would be the defensive coordinator, Greg [Davis] would be the offensive coordinator and we would keep this rolling.
"I've told the staff that if any of you talk about the future, if any of you start discussing the next step, I'm going to fire you. It's not fair to me, it's not fair to the kids and it's not fair to the other coaches on the staff."
Enough. And if Mack Brown and Will Muschamp are happy with the situation, everyone else should stop worrying about it.
Just feels good to type this. The Horns own the Sooners.
It's no secret that the two schools wield a lot of power in a conference that barely survived its own self-destruction in June. It is more of a secret that the administrations of both schools have helped shape conference and college sports history. Dodds and former OU AD Donnie Duncan basically brought the Big 12 together 15 years ago. These days, Dodds and Castiglione are colleagues and friends.
If it were only that easy. In the only relationship that matters to most fans, Oklahoma finds itself looking up at Texas during the latest trend in their epic rivalry.
Texas is just that devious. Yes, Belmont had it all planned out.
Mack Brown made the rounds in Bristol, Conn., this week. He went from set to set, chatting up every ESPN show as if he were sweeping through recruits' living rooms.
It was clever marketing. While the Big 12 was beginning its media sessions in the Dallas area, the Longhorns stole the national stage.
Do we have to say this again? Don't mess with Texas-OU.
New rivalry with Kansas State?
One of the comments I've seen popping up in season previews of the Texas Longhorns is that they are looking forward to having Kansas State back on the schedule.
Writers have dubbed the game, which will be played Nov. 6 at Snyder Family Stadium, a revenge match. The Wildcats defeated the Longhorns in each of their past two meetings, and were the only Big 12 team Colt McCoy was unable to beat during his stellar career.
So I'm sure there are some on Texas' roster who want the chance to knockoff K-State. But not as many as you might think.
Mack Brown is a pro at these media thingys.
Lamar Houston on the game with Alabama:
"We just ran out of time," Houston said. "If we kept playing, we would have won."
It's a theory that he has shared often with new teammate Rolando McClain, the Raiders' first-round pick from Alabama.
"Rolando knows the truth," Houston said, smiling. "They won by default."
Jerrod Johnson answers five questions. Just five.
Are you the best quarterback in the country?
"I feel I'm the best quarterback in the country, but I think the best quarterback in the country will be ultimately tested on who wins the most games. Whatever that might be is how you ultimately judge that, but I definitely feel I'm competent and that my skills are comparable."
Now the Aggies want to be the prettiest girl in the room.
Texas A&M coach Mike Sherman opened his news conference Monday by saying the Big 12 needs the Aggies to return to national prominence. For that to happen, their hopes lie with two stars.
On offense, everything will revolve around senior quarterback Jerrod Johnson. He returns as one of the most respected players in the conference and has proved himself as a playmaker.
The Aggies want their money. NOW.
I do believe that is called extortion. They will stick around as long everyone pays.
They leave that job for Nebraska. Sooners don't whine.
Bob Stoops boasted that his team never whined about the injuries that turned a national championship contender in September into a Sun Bowl champion in December.
Tight end Jermaine Gresham never played a snap in 2009 and was drafted in the first round of April's NFL draft. Reigning Heisman winner Sam Bradford didn't make it to halftime of the season opener before an injury to his throwing shoulder eventually required surgery. A rash of other injuries on both lines turned hopes of 14-0 before the season began into a frustrating reality of 8-5 at season's end.
"It happened," Stoops said. "You move on."
Landry Jones will lead the Sooners back to the promised land.
"Coming into this season . . . you can tell (Jones) is in command," Stoops said. "You can tell how confident he is and sure of what he's doing."
If Jones continues to develop, Stoops said, his level of performance will be comparable to that of Bradford and former Sooner quarterbacks Jason White and Josh Heupel.
"We've won (Big 12) championships, six of them, with five different quarterbacks. That says a lot," Stoops said. "And (Jones) is in that mold of all those guys."
Ryan Broles for Heisman?
"I wouldn't think you were crazy to say that," said Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops at Wednesday's Big 12 Conference media days.
OK, I'm saying (writing) it.
Is Broyles a Heisman long shot? Absolutely. Does he have no shot? Absolutely not.
Yea, Bob. Right back at ya'.
Even Stoops, between talking conference titles, admitted he hated to see Texas quarterback Colt McCoy suffer an injury early in the BCS title game.
"But let me say this," Stoops added quickly. "I wasn't rooting for Texas to win."
The Pokes
OU Insider has a Q&A with Poke coach Mike Gundy.
Q. Just wondering what was it about the offense that you like that made you want to switch to that?
COACH GUNDY: I felt like the number of players that we could recruit to fit this system was greater than the system that we had competed with in the years before. If you look at the areas that we recruit in Kansas and Oklahoma and Texas, Louisiana, most of the offenses have a number of wide receivers who can make plays and running backs. There's not as many tight ends. There's not as many fullbacks to recruit.
So we believe that the success in college football is all about the players you bring in, and there's a greater pool to choose from in this type of offense than what we have played with in the past.
Things are coming up roses in the Big 12-2.
"There’s a great deal of excitement about the future of the Big 12," Beebe said. "There’s a renewed sense of commitment, a new sense of belonging and a greater appreciation for each other."
No one can talk about the future.
Texas coach Mack Brown said coaches were told to stay away from talking about the future of the league.
The Commish combats all those pesky rumors.
"I think there's such a leap to get to the airwaves or the Internet that it was, frankly, somewhat disappointing about how little attention was given to whether something was true or not," Beebe said. "We have not changed our revenue distribution formula whatsoever. Whatever institutions at any level in our conference were able to achieve before, they still have the same ability. There's no different -- nobody got more money."
Big, bad bullies OU and Texas would like some company.
Big 12 bullies Texas and Oklahoma will roll into Big 12 Media Days here Wednesday, and their presence will remind everyone of the conference's pecking order.
The Longhorns and Sooners have claimed the last six Big 12 championships. Each school has won a national crown in the past 10 years. And with Nebraska bailing the league after this year, their dominance should continue well into the next decade.
"I'm not happy about it, but that's a good way to put it," Oklahoma State defensive end Jamie Blatnick said. "So let's go take it from them."
Two schools will continue to dominate the conference.
Big 12 football’s structure after this season — 10 teams, round-robin schedule, no conference championship game — means one thing for certain. The dominance of Oklahoma and Texas should continue into the foreseeable future.
With a playoff game, the North Division champion has a puncher’s chance of winning the league title. But under a round-robin format, winning the title for any of the other eight teams likely means beating OU and Texas.
Maybe the Buffs should use all walk-ons?
If Colorado coach Dan Hawkins had as much luck with his blue-chip signees as he has had with his lesser-regarded recruits, the Buffaloes might be riding high. Instead, Hawkins is on the hot seat heading into his fifth season.
Through his first four years, none of which has resulted in a winning season, up seems to be down, and down seems to be up when projecting what CU recruits will do. Hawkins has gotten little or no production from some of his highest-rated recruits, including tailback Darrell Scott, linebacker Lynn Katoa and wide receiver Markques Simas.
On the other hand, former walk-on Scotty McKnight stands just three catches from becoming CU's all-time receptions leader, and CU's two-deep is full of formerly unheralded prospects, including 5-foot-6, 175-pound tailback Rodney Stewart, the team's leading rusher the last two seasons.
Once again, there is a quarterback question in Manhattan.
Probably not coming as a surprise to Kansas State fans, head coach Bill Snyder hasn't decided on a quarterback yet for the season opener at home on Sept. 4 against UCLA.
Odds are it will be senior Carson Coffman, as he has emerged as a slight favorite coming out of spring practices. But then again, Snyder said on Tuesday during Big 12 Football Media Days that sophomore Collin Klein and junior Sammuel Lamur will also be vying for the starting job.
The Tigers are all fired up about that game with the Sooners.
"It's a big game. It's our Homecoming game," said cornerback Kevin Rutland. "Since I've been here, we've never beaten them. So it's a big game for me, and our entire team. Losing to them in both championship games, it hurt. So we'll be ready for them."
Said running back Derrick Washington: "We're looking forward to that. The last time we played them in the Big 12 Championship, they put it on us.
Missouri's QB is ready to stay healthy.
The Parkway West graduate answered emphatically and instantly, earning Big 12 offensive player of the week honors in his splendid first game against Illinois and ascending among the nation's passing leaders to trigger MU's 4-0 start.
But it was what Gabbert did after being hobbled by an ankle injury for much of the rest of the season that perhaps most distinguished him.
There is a defense unit in Lubbock.
Now about that guys who play defense at Texas Tech. Yes, they really exist. Who knew?
"We want to let them know that they're part of the team," he said. "The one thing I've noticed about our defense is they didn't have a lot of confidence. You know, there wasn't a lot of talk about them.
"If it was, it was about not playing very well. I think they played pretty well last year. I'm a team player. I wanted the players to know pretty quick this is going to be about team. It's not going to be about special teams or defense or offense. It's going to be about team."
This next statement should frighten people and especially Robert Griffin. I probably know more about football than Baylor's left tackle.
Tough schedules don't bother the Cyclones.
The schedule reads like a prison sentence for a rebuilding program.
Iowa State's 2010 slate features 10 games against 2009 bowl teams, including two against BCS programs Iowa and Texas.
The epic degree of difficulty of the Cyclones' schedule, which has been ranked by analyst Phil Steele as the nation's toughest, has ISU slotted to finish last in the Big 12 North Division, according to the league's preseason media poll.
Bad taste in ties? Mike Gundy and Turner Gill have a lot in common.
Kansas coach Turner Gill (on Wednesday) and Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy (Tuesday) both showed up at Big 12 Media Days wearing paisley ties. But their similarities go far past wardrobe.
Tommy isn't on teevee anymore.
When new Texas Tech football coach Tommy Tuberville volunteered his opinion in a live radio interview recently that he questions the long-term viability of the restructured Big 12 Conference because of its revenue distribution, he was reprimanded by commissioner Dan Beebe.
"In television they taught us to speak our mind," Tuberville said. "I forgot to get that out of my mind a few weeks ago."
Big 12-2 Controversy! Tommy Tuberville wants a 2004 revote for the national champion but Bob Stoops doesn't.
"Why in the world would you not give it to somebody? Oklahoma, us, Utah? It doesn't make any sense," Tuberville said. "Everybody played that year. So you give it to a team that wins it on the field – uh oh, they cheated. They broke rules. We're gonna take it away from 'em. Well, give it to somebody. Because there's other teams that did the right things that were there."
Crop Watch: Children of the Corn
There really isn't much to do in Nebraska, is there? The Cornhuskers are at it again.
Who knew the Texas football team had so much love for Nebraska?
The Longhorns said so many syrupy things about the Huskers at Wednesday's Big 12 media days that the floor of the interview room was declared a hazardous waste slick.
It is called being a class act. Something Cornhusker fans don't seem to know much about anymore.
Really, this is all much ado about nothing. A national pundit caused all this mess.
Osborne and Pelini have both expressed disappointment about the "Beat Texas" slogan on the video that came from the Nebraska marketing department. Probably not a big deal until a national pundit made it one by writing a column about it. The slogan has since been removed.
Fun with Bo Pelini, Barking Carnival style.
Pelini: That’s really why — you know, at the end of the bowl game, after the Arizona game, when I said Nebraska’s back, I wasn’t saying we arrived, and we’d won a national championship or anything like that.
Lose to Iowa State. Go 10-4. Win minor bowl game. Nebraska’s back!
In fairness, Pelini means that the culture of Nebraska football is back (minus steroids, felonies, championships). What says Nebraska football more than pushing around an undermanned league?
Roll left, roll right...Either way, you lost.
If you keep asking the same question, you get the same answer. Did the official tell you what you wanted to hear?
There was Walt Anderson at a podium again.
Except on Tuesday, there was no mention of Rule 12:3. No use of the word "egregious."
That’s the word most Husker backers probably associate with Anderson, the Big 12’s coordinator of officials, the man at the center of a news conference moments after last December’s conference championship. He assured everyone that the officials had gotten the call right.
And finally...
This is for Bob. Sooner video day.
And Bob...We weren't rooting for you, either.
BDR doesn't endorse any of the rubbish that is out there, we just link to it. If you happen to find something on the interwebs that might be of interest, please send the link to dimecoverage@gmail.com.
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is really how it went down behind the scenes @ Big 12 Media Day...
“TAMU president R. Bowen Loftin: The name’s Francis Soyer, but everybody calls me Psycho. Any of you guys call me Francis, and I’ll kill you.
Tuberville: Ooooooh.
Loftin: You just made the list, buddy. And I don’t like nobody touching my stuff. So just keep your meat-hooks off. If I catch any of you guys in my stuff, I’ll kill you. Also, I don’t like nobody touching me. Now, any of you homos touch me, and I’ll kill you.
Beebe: Lighten up, Francis.”
You have like two years before the money is due. Geeez….I could understand if it were 2011 Big 12 Media Days.
"I just want Texas to be number one in something other than executions, toll roads and property taxes." ~ Kinky Friedman
This movie is AMAZING...
Don’t know what happened to my DVD copy though… :(
by ElMariachiLoco on Jul 30, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Smart money says...
someone “borrowed” your copy never to bring it back! :) Also amazing is that originally Stripes was suppose to be Cheech & Chong not Bill Murray & Harold Ramis…
"I just want Texas to be number one in something other than executions, toll roads and property taxes." ~ Kinky Friedman
The athletic department had to borrow 16 million a few years ago and now A&M is publicly demanding their 20 million dollar payout.
Five of the schools that would have been left behind had the conference dissolved — Baylor, Missouri, Iowa State, Kansas and Kansas State — had agreed to give up their parts of the departing schools’ fees to the "big three" to make sure they reached the $20 million.
Beebe said Tuesday that UT and OU had declined that offer but that A&M had not. He added that the issue would be discussed further.
The A&M official said Wednesday it wasn’t the school’s "concern" how the Big 12 got its money together for the revenue distribution — just that it lived up to its promise of $20 million. The
A&M is a state flagship institution and a respected university. The school now looks petty.
by dimecoverage on Jul 29, 2010 8:26 PM CDT up reply actions
it is funny this is being brought up again now
because as I recall, texas and OU both said they weren’t going to accept the exit penalty money portions from the Forgotten Five in the week that followed the decision to keep the 10-team Big 12
Our athletic department made a $20 million dollar profit after going 4-8 in 2008-09. Financially, we’re doing fine. People who keep bringing up that $16 million LOC don’t understand debt service. This would be akin to me pointing out that texas sold roughly $1 billion in debt in BABs, so they must be in financial trouble.
Well, it is good to know that the A&M athletic department has recovered from that unfortunate incident.
And of course, tea sips aren’t all that bright so we couldn’t possibly understand a 16 million dollar shortfall.
It will be interesting to see what figures the Aggies actually turn in to the State Auditor’s office for the 2008-2009 year.
by dimecoverage on Jul 29, 2010 9:06 PM CDT up reply actions
what our athletic department says they are doing with their budget
and what they do and what they actually report are three different things
When you consider that you can find three different sets of numbers in the various databases accounting for athletic department revenues and expenditures online, it is anyone’s guess what they actually report to the State Auditor
what our athletic department says they are doing with their budget
and what they do and what they actually report are three different things
This is your defense?
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on Jul 30, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Didn't A&M fire their president
in part because she hinted that it was time to start paying the money back? So what exactly are the debt servicing requirements for the $16 million? I was under the impression there was no amortization/payment schedule and that it was supposed to be more of a bridge loan to fund a “temporary” shortfall.
no
Murano didn’t bring up the LOC until after she received the negative review from Chancellor McKinney; it was in her response to his review.
she was basically fired b/c she was a poor leader
I agree with A&M's stance
Money problems or no, they made a decision in part (if not wholly) due to the financial benefits that were promised. The change in tone from the league, and from Texas and OU, after the conference was pulled back together feels like it was all a fabricated story to appease the fans of UT, OU and A&M and to keep A&M from bolting to the SEC.
So the Aggies are still sorting out their Daddy issues
I thought they’d finished sorting out their Daddy issues in June when they decided not to leave Daddy behind for the big, bad SEC.
A high-ranking A&M official said late Wednesday that every legal avenue would be explored first, with the potential of bolting for the Southeastern Conference coming after.
Give us our allowance or we’re running away, Daddy!
Yup.
Sounds like someone needs a kid’s cone from Dairy Queen to make it all better.
Holding someone to a promise may not be extortion but a .500 team demanding $20 mil sure sounds a lot like attempted robbery.
3/19/2009 & 12/15/2009 - Games Where Dogus Balbay Made a Three-Pointer. Never Forget.
they can threaten to run away all they want
but the SEC isnt expanding on their own so they might as well take what we allow them to have and like it!!
I love the Walt Anderson article
The same question must have been asked at least 10 times. Did you guys make a mistake? How do you feel about the call? Were you left up at night? Are you sure you didn’t make a mistake? How many people were up in the booth? Did they all make a mistake? Every non-biased fan in the country saw the ball struck the ground at the 1 second mark. Obviously it’s egregious if it prevents a team from having another play.
biased fans, too
Every non-biased fan in the country saw the ball struck the ground at the 1 second mark.
Make no mistake, I was rooting against texas in that game, but the decision to put the second back on the clock is the right one. The wailing and gnashing of teeth about this issue from some (but not all) ’Husker fans has surprised me. It seemed like a fairly obvious call to me at the time.
People say Pelini believes in working hard, is instilling a blue-collar attitude, is making everyone accountable, but really, his reaction following that game reflects just the opposite, and some Nebraska fans seem to be following his lead.
respect for Beergut
I’m glad your using your head and not your heart on the 1 second issue. The video doesn’t lie. I thought there could’ve been 2 seconds at the game (thats how obvious it was). The video later revealed it was 1 second. The refs did the right thing. Nebraska is just bitter because they had the game won and they blew it in the last minute.
No!
Observing reality and not willfully deceiving oneself does not earn respect.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on Jul 30, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
So being spontaneously upset after just missing out on the biggest win...
in the last 10 years for Neb qualifies Pelini as lazy and not accountable. Pelini hasn’t said anything else since. He is emotional and wears it on his sleeve. He is not a robot. And if you are “surprised” by “wailing and gnashing of teeth”, well, welcome to college football.
And on the one-second call, historically refs have been very inconsistent on that issue. Just look at 1998 Rose Bowl, WSU should have had at least 2 seconds left, but the official just followed the time keeper and called game. So no, its not like the 0:01 second thing is some sort of 11th commandment that all officials correctly call. Historically, its damn near random how officials have handled it, like holding nowadays.
Having said all that, my huskers did choke the game away.
Well...
You answered a question I had a few days ago regarding whether or not any Nebraska fans had actually looked at the replay and considered the near-universally undisputed evidence. I must say, your point of view is the saddest form of delusion.
It seems a decade of failure has made your fanbase small and petty indeed.
by BrooklynHorn on Jul 30, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions
I have no issue with Pelini’s (either one) first reaction after the game ended. His team played well and the disappointment must have been painful after that loss. But I hope that he was big enough to contact Brown and apologize. Texas did not cheat to win.
What we take issue with is the continued theme from fans, etc. of Texas stole the game. That is bullshit and y’all know it.
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Egregious call
Nebraskas first points occured after replay officials overturned field officials ball placement on a fourth down attempt by NU, righting an “egregious” error. Without this call Nu only has 9 points at the game’s end, rendering this argument moot. Conveniently forgotten.
It is called being a class act. Something Cornhusker fans don’t seem to know much about anymore.
Pot meet kettle.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
Actually, Texas fans haven’t been known for being overly courteous in the past and we didn’t have a reputation to destroy.
by dimecoverage on Jul 29, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry Huker
As a Sooner fan and a Big 8 fan I hate to have to disagree. Nebraska winning would have been the only bright spot in a bad OU season. I have a lot of respect for Nebraska and the rivalry that our schools had in the past. Unlike the hatred I have of anything burnt orange. Although it pains me to say, the officials made the right call. I honestly don’t know why all the complaining. After replay it was pretty obvious that the ball touch the ground and the clock was at 1. The rule book is pretty clear on this one.
so...
…your kicker had nothing to do with the final drive?? DOH!!!
…the defender committing the horse collar had nothing to do with the final drive?? DOH!!!
Instead of whining about one second, maybe ya’ll need to whine about your boneheaded players making boneheaded plays. Rewind the tape and you’ll see the loss rests squarely on your shoulders.
Or are you just mad the Huskers only have 6 wins against the South since 20005 (of which 4 are against Baylor)?!?! Or could it be the Huskers are 1 & 8 against Texas since the Big 12 was formed?!?
Damn Straight Dime
……could never root for the land thieves!
Bob has to remind us..
Because he knows he’s going to be coming up short again this year for the big 12 championship. He is used to coming up short tho.
by nojusticenopeaceftp on Jul 30, 2010 4:25 AM CDT reply actions
No he's not.
Considering he’s won 3 times as many as your coach. Winning the RRS is great for bragging rights but if you don’t finish then you can’t win the conference. So I’m trying to see where Bob Stoops is coming up short again for the Big 12 championship. Seems to me from past experience it’s Texas that ends up coming up short. You’ve won 4 of the last 5 yet only 2 Big 12 titles came from that.
A&M national prominence
If A&M can beat Arkansas, then they will return to national prominence for this season. I think A&M will go back to the 6-6 seasons after this year. Sherman will be fired after next season. He isn’t cutting it in the recruiting battle. This season will be a big smoke screen for A&M (maybe). If they stink it up this year, then Sherman will be gone for sure after the season.
I don’t balme A&M for wanting the 20M that they were promised. A&M won’t make the bowl games Texas and OU will in the future, so they need every penny they can get.
The money isn't the issue.
The issue is that A&M, state flagship institution, self-proclaimed great football program had to have the money in the first place. It is an embarrassment for the university and they look pathetic going to the press demanding their cash.
If you want to play with the big boys, start acting like one. Take a cue from Texas and OU.
I can’t believe I just complimented the Land Thieves…
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions
yeah
it’s embarrassing to insist someone keep their word
it isn’t that we NEED the money, we’re just trying to make sure we don’t get screwed on this deal
since the whole deal was a verbal agreement, I see nothing wrong with making sure we get it in writing, which is what we’re trying to do right now
No.
What is embarrassing is that A&M has to ask for the money at all. And, at a minimum, they should have asked for the money privately. This public spectacle makes the university look bad. I’m not the antagonist here; I’m concerned with school’s reputation. Your new president is not serving your school well.
Unfortunately, we are all stuck with A&M since you backed out on the SEC and public spats don’t do much for the conference as a whole. So yes, Beebe should pay up just to get this story out of the news.
Tuberville was right. This conference isn’t long for this world.
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions
What is embarrassing is that A&M has to ask for the money at all.
This should read…What is embarrassing is that A&M was offered the money in the first place.
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Why is A&M being offered embarassing?
I don’t follow.
by Horncasting on Jul 30, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Paying off the Aggies to get then to stay in the conference? Embarrassing for all involved. Hell, Beebe, Dodds and Castiglione should have let them go to the SEC. Good riddance.
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
You know
I hated the idea of splitting Texas from A&M two months ago. But the more I consider the logistics, the power dynamics, and the finances involved, I’m left wondering if we just went through a pretentious session of fluffy and idealistic marriage counseling, and decided to prolong an unhappy marriage that really needs to be abandoned. Perhaps its just healthier for everyone involved.
by BrooklynHorn on Jul 30, 2010 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions
No no no...
…I insist on using the work-out-the-Daddy-issues analogy to the bad marriage analogy. I won’t be denied this.
by Hopkins Horn on Jul 30, 2010 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Alright then
Are the Aggies the promising-but-disappointing son to our father with high standards, the unwanted stepson who’s always around when we’re trying to bed his mother, or the genetically-related offspring born with a low IQ whom we pretend doesn’t exist when we’re in social situations?
by BrooklynHorn on Jul 31, 2010 2:24 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm going with Option A
I can’t contemplate what an Aggie mother might look like, let alone contemplate sleeping with her, so I can’t go with Option B.
And I don’t like Option C since, in my scenario, Aggie has at least enough intelligence to recognize that there are in fact Daddy issues which need to be addressed.
So I think it’s Option A by default.
(PS to BHorn: I think I’ve settled on Everton. Does this mean we’re now mortal enemies?)
by Hopkins Horn on Jul 31, 2010 10:02 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Aug 14th Baby! EPL has the drop on college football.
Quite ironically (or appropriately), Everton and Liverpool split from the same club about 100 years ago, much like Texas and A&M. Now their stadiums are roughly 2 blocks apart.
Its a good choice in the long run, as Everton are unlikely to be demoted. But you’re going to have to get used to playing A&M’s role in this rivalry, as Everton certainly remain in Anfield’s shadow.
Interestingly, there was a period in the mid-60’s when Liverpool and Everton were taking turns winning the League. This happens to coincide with the emergence of the Beatles. Can you imagine what it must have been like to have been growing up in Liverpool during those years? It must have seemed like the center of the Universe.
by BrooklynHorn on Jul 31, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Can I be Texas Tech instead?
It’s not like I’m going to start having intimate relations with sheep or anything like that if I’m an Everton supporter, right?
by Hopkins Horn on Jul 31, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Lots lf good stuff on the round up as always Dime
But that last video of the MNC game against fl is still too painful to watch. I’m probably a year or two away from not losing sleep over it when it comes to mind. Effing wilson and his hurry up at all cost.
I’m sure it is painful, as was our loss to Alabama.
Sorry, just had to post it for Bob’s comment. :-) Not that I blame him. I rooted for the Gators.
by dimecoverage on Jul 30, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Now imagine losing Sam Bradford early in the game
Going down big early, but coming back strong to be within three with three minutes left, and then having it taken away again. OU blew some good chances against Florida to take control of the game, but you at least had Bradford the whole game. I would have killed for Colt to play the whole game, because I am 99.9% sure we would have won.
by TheElusiveShadow on Jul 30, 2010 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah, I understand
having your leader go out on the first series had to suck. Injuries killed us last year, but in the biggest game of the year would literally make you sick. I didn’t have anything emotionally invested, but I felt I was kind of cheated out of seeing the game as it was meant to be. Also, keep in mind the scenario you described above was the RRS.
I think even football respecting Alabama fans
Would have preferred to watch Colt play, win or lose. I wasn’t happy that Bradford got knocked out against Texas either, although I had a feeling he had come back a little too early. I’d have much preferred that we played with Colt and lost, because like you said, it feels like all of college football got cheated out of watching the game as it was meant to be played. It’s nobody’s fault, of course; just a mound of rotten luck, which happens.
by TheElusiveShadow on Jul 30, 2010 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Punish the qb
Bama knocked Colt out of the game fair and square. Since Colt was the bulk of the UT O, punishing him relentlessly had to be a key objective in the Bama gameplan. Bama made UT pay for running Colt between the tackles. The reason defenders hit QBs so hard is to force a TO and try to get the starter out of the game. There is a reason that QBs wear flack jackets and that there are special rules to protect QBs from injury (because they are primary targets). When a DL guy picks up a QB and slams him into the ground, he is trying to separate a shoulder.
Injuries are unfortunate but they are frequently not accidents.
Colt has suffered season ending or ruining nerve damage 3 times while playing football: once in high school and twice in college. Mack/GD/Colt took a high risk approach with Colt: he ran frequently and rarely threw the ball away when pressured (instead mostly either running, taking a sack, or trying for the completion).
Kill the QB is the pro approach.
Punish the QB is the diplomatic college equivalent. But it is what you do.
Even if Colt hadn’t been injured on the fifth play, I have no doubt that the attack would have been relentless. He was the single most important cog to our offense, with Shipley a number two and probably Ulatowski a number three. Tactically speaking, those are the physical objectives that a team could knock out and subsequently hamstring the offense.
I’ve seen the Horns do that as well…I remember the years when OU and others ran the option…we’d force the pitch if we had a great safety (Stanley Richard I recall did a great job) but otherwise we’d force the QB to keep it and then stand him up and bust his ass repeatedly.
With Tech in its current mode, whacking the QB is the key to degrading the offense and KOing the receivers is next.
Moving GG under center not only gives him some protection, it should also shift some of the offensive burden from his shoulders (vs. the onus of the Colt offense). Sherrod can run the offense…but he only has appeared in five games and may not pass effectively, hell, he’s never thrown a pass in a game.
So I think there is a certain fragility with respect to depth and structure in the Texas QB situation that should be addressed this year. While we have had great QBs at the top, we’ve had shit for skilled and experienced depth for a long, long time and that is dangerous. We can count three losses toward that: at KSU, A&M (06) and bama. Considering Texas has only had nine losses in the last six years, that’s a third of them.
Do you think this will get some attention this season?

by 


































