Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

2010 Texas Longhorns Season: The Things I Must Know

It's summer. It's hot here in Dallas. And football season is exactly 60 days, 0 hours, 16 minutes and 49... no, 48 seconds away.

We are smack in the middle of the sports wasteland known as July, wondering aimlessly for any sign of sports life. Alias, there's none in sight. There's the mirage known as the World Cup, but we continue in search of a brand of football where men don't wine like toddlers when they fall down.

It's around this time every year when questions, concerns and predictions start to swim around in my head, hijacking my days, and sometimes, my nights. Yes, I woke up in the middle of the night a few days ago and the first thing that popped in my head was how Garrett Gilbert dips too much when he drops back to pass. I mean, the kid loses at least 2 inches when he does that. I trust Greg Davis has at least purged him of that demon. Let's hope so, at least for the sake of a good night's sleep. (And I won't mention how he releases the ball too low. The mind can only handle so much.)

I had to sit down and flush out on electronic paper my top questions, concerns and things I'm most looking forward to as the 2010 Texas Longhorns football season draws closer. It's not that I expect to have all these issues settled by October, I just felt like I needed to get them out there, and hopefully encourage you to do the same.

Star-divide

Garrett Gilbert: Is he Chris Simms or Colt McCoy?

I was at the University Co-op store in Dallas with my daughters the other day and I saw several wracks of No. 7 jerseys. It just made me uneasy. It's not that I think Gilbert can't get the job done, but I'm always squeamish about entering a new era. I felt the same way in 1999 after the Ricky Williams era and the same in 2006 after the Vince Young era.

During the fourth quarter of the National Championship Game, many Texas fans broke out in chants of "Gilbert, Gilbert, Gilbert" several times, so it started to sink in early (albeit way too early) that the transition had already begun, whether we wanted it to or not. I really think he'll be great, but he must have help around him. He has the size, the arm and the accuracy, but does he have those oh-so precious intangibles? The answer will be revealed in the journey. One thing's for sure-No. 10 and No. 12 are not going to walk out of that DKR tunnel, so all we can do is dive in and hope that Gilbert can run the show.

Can we finally get a ball carrier, please?

This is Texas. We should be able to run the ball when we want to. If the offense is going to go under center more often this year, we must have a consistent threat on the ground. Big 12 defenses are now built for the passing game, so we need to hit'em in the gut with the carries. I don't think Tre' Newton has the bulk for 20-plus touches a game. But I do think he is the best all-around option we have right now, and I expect at least 800 yards from him this season. Chris Whaley, Cody Johnson, Fozzy "Waka Waka" Whittaker and Vondrell McGee all bring something different, but none are as complete as Newton. Although, we still haven't seen Whaley's potential, but something tells me he's more Henry Melton II than Cedric Benson II. Newton will do, if the coaches give him the nod. Or, can we get a little Traylon Shead? Just a little peek? Please?

First Line of Defense

Having played on the offensive and defensive lines for nine years, I'm one of those who believe the game is played from the line of scrimmage out. Have a solid line on both sides of the ball, and the rest of the pieces will be much easier to place. But there are huge holes to fill on the 2010 defensive line, and that worries me.

Sergio Kindle and Lamarr Houston were huge last year, and I know there is tremendous talent locked and loaded to take their place, but it's all what could be. We already know Sam Acho is special. Alex Okafor, Derek Johnson and Kheeston Randall might turn out to be fantastic, not to mention the true freshmen talent coming in, but how will they work together? What will the rotations be like? Will Muschamp's boys must get the first line of defense locked down before we start talking about the linebackers and DBs.

Who's the No. 1 receiver?

Dan Buckner wore No. 4 during his short say in Austin, which, if you think about it, is kind of sacrilegious. But he wasn't a top option anyway. So, who is? I like Malcolm Williams' potential, but he's too inconsistent. I just don't trust him to be the guy (see the mistimed jump that may have been a touchdown in the Rose Bowl). Marquise Goodwin should be a great weapon, but is he a first option? Gilbert will be more comfortable having a No. 1 go-to guy, and I don't see him emerging yet. That said, I can't wait to see what Greg Timmons and that gaggle of true freshmen have in their bags.

OK, those are just four issues. I'll share more latter. For now, leave a comment with your top issue keeping you up at night. How do you see things shaking out in the fall?

Poll
Which of these areas is most in question heading into the 2010 football season?
Quarterback
196 votes
Running Back
741 votes
Receiver
225 votes
Defensive Line
124 votes
Kicker
30 votes
Linebacker
14 votes

1330 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Exactly what I was typing right now.

I’d give the o-line a grade somewhere between C+ and B- for last season. The good news is that a number of the dough boys are gone now – but that good feeling is well tempered by the fact that we’ve got a lot of unproven talent to break in before they need to protect a lot of unproven talent at QB and RB.

by TXinDC on Jul 6, 2010 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I voted for running back

Only because offensive line wasn’t an option. Totally agree.

by GoHorns on Jul 6, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.

by LonghornEm on Jul 6, 2010 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Bingo

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Jul 6, 2010 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I voted QB because he is a function of the O line

and so are the RBs and receivers. In addition, until we have a proven back-up, we can have a serious problem on any given offensive play. This is very much like 2006 in this regard.

You nailed it, lh.

by whills on Jul 6, 2010 8:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was screaming this too, looking at the poll.

If the line improves from last year to this one, which is a stretch, then GG “Grapes” and Newton “Figs” will put up great numbers.

I’m not really worried about anything on our team next year, except the O-Line. Well, and worried if GG is another Simms, but I think he exercised that demon in the NC game.

by notsofst on Jul 7, 2010 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Least worried: D-line

And anything to do with defense. The definition of the phrase “embarrassment of riches” currently is “University of Texas football – defense”.

I’m of course worried about running the ball, but I expect Davis can (and maybe too readily will?) revert to Gilbert’s comfort with the spread if things don’t pan out with the backs.

Receivers are still a big huge question. I think Marquis is pretty undersized for a receiver and doesn’t have the beef to withstand being the go-to receiver. I think Williams realizes the need to step it up – and even if he remains inconsistent, his value in blocking will be hugely important to help bust open some second level holes for the running backs.

I’m mostly excited/nervous to see the new backs get a crack, as well as the new receivers get some playing time.

Like last year, I’ll probably take the most pleasure in watching the Goon Squad & co rip opponents apart.

by TXinDC on Jul 6, 2010 2:53 PM CDT reply actions  

The only issue that worries me about the defense ...

… is that ET is not there. I feel that his talented, heady, playmaking ability was huge last year and the rest of the DBs are going to have to really step it up, as a whole, to fill that void. Aside from that playmaking aspect, I think this group of DBs is easily the best in the country this year.

by robthecob on Jul 6, 2010 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

They always do step up

We have one of the best DB coaches in the nation. Think about all the DB talent we’ve put out in years past. Huff, Jammer and the Griffins. This feels like a strong point of the team to me.

OU SUCKS!!!!!!

by TexasFight83 on Jul 7, 2010 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

offensive line, i’m not worried about defense much at all, but on offense having a beast mode offensive line can make all the difference in the world. open up big holes for even a mediocre running back to pop through for 5 to 8 yards a pop, give a green QB time to go through his progressions without fear of being blind sided, etc.

by Displaced Longhorn on Jul 6, 2010 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

The O-line is a concern for sure, but these are the top 4 right now, for me, anyway. If Texas is to run the ball more, then it will depend on the O-line ability to push. But it remains to be seen if the recommit to the run is for real.

"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

by ElongatedHorn on Jul 6, 2010 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

If it ain't for real, you're gonna see the damnest pressure rush you've ever seen on GG.

That’s what you do with a rookie starter no matter how good he is. You make him prove it and you beat him up as much as you can. Wyoming may not be able to do much but UCLA will.

by whills on Jul 6, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

From a Sooner viewpoint

and I’ll try to be objective. Defense in the middle looks to be the concern. Hard to replace Houston I think, especially early. Lots of talent on the edges and muschamp will cover up any weaknesses. The secondary looks solid. O-line will be the main concern with the changing of positions and new personnel. Will the power running game develop in time to be effective against OU & Neb. Also will they protect the RS-FR QB well enough to prevent the inevitable mistakes that come with inexperience. The success of this team will depend on them.

by soonerspeak on Jul 6, 2010 3:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Re: DL

What do Derek Lokey, Roy Miller and Lamar Houston have in common? They all had to replace stellar predecessors on the DLine.

What else do they have in common? We were saying the same things about them as you are saying now.

One thing I’ve learned in the past few years is to not question two positions at Texas. DL and DB. Somehow, some way, they just keep the turnstyle going.

by GoHorns on Jul 6, 2010 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tried to forget

But unless you’re referencing someone else, I don’t see what Scott Derry and Bobino have to do with this discussion.

by GoHorns on Jul 6, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

IIRC, Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum were Palmer and Foster, but I could be wrong.

by mikey 4 on Jul 6, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

My top concern

Is O-line.

Having said that, I am also a bit nervous about our receiving corps. It’s not that we don’t have a ton of talent there, but there is definitely a lack of consistency (see Williams, Kirkendoll).

I do think MW will prove the doubters (me included) wrong this year and develop a set of hands. He seems to have the right attitude, at least from what I’ve heard.

by Longhorn11 on Jul 6, 2010 3:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Both Quan and Shipley were like 30 years old

I think Kirk and Mal are still developing, and consistency will grow each year.

by notsofst on Jul 7, 2010 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Judging by the voting,

most of us still buy into the concept that the running game failures are the fault of the running backs. OK. I accept that point of view.

I just don’t believe it.

Do we have a running back who can get the job done? Yes, probably about three of them. Same three we had last year. Or wsa it four? And is it 5-6 now? Whatever. If Mack and GD and Applewhite had gone to Colt in March of ‘09 and told him he was primarily an under-center QB and the H-back was being added (with the intent of using it most of the time), we’d have run the ball effectively last fall. And passed it less often, and less effectively. And maybe opened the season 13-0.

So how’d I vote? Receiver is the area I most question. We know the freshmen, or Coach Boom, have to step up to solve defensive tackle. We know the O-line will be inexperienced early. I have no idea who the go-to receiver will be. And whether we continue to go 3- and 4-wide most of the time — or pack it in and try to stake our claim the area between the offensive tackles and the strong safety. I don’t know whether Goodwin is a speedy flash or the next big thing, whether Malcolm will ever get consistent and play as big as he measures, whether John Chiles is an athlete without a position trying to play WR, whether Kirkendoll can come up big as a senior, whether one of the touted freshmen (including Timmons) is ready to play, whether Hales is a home run or a strikeout.

Other than those questions, I’m pretty confortable at receiver.

by edsp on Jul 6, 2010 3:52 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Judging by the voting,
most of us still buy into the concept that the running game failures are the fault of the running backs. OK. I accept that point of view.

I just don’t believe it.

Read the first few most of the comments. The OLine is a far greater concern for most of us, but wasn’t an option. Given that the OL is the biggest concern, it stands to reason that the running game would suffer should the OL suffer.

Regarding the receivers, you have a valid point. But I think GG has had some time to develop some good relationships with the likes of Goodwin (albeit not in summer workouts) and some of the freshmen. I’m not quite as concerned with the WR position.

by GoHorns on Jul 6, 2010 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Point taken

O-line was not an option. Perhaps the 3-day weekend has left me…. somewhat bleary-eyed and lacking in focus. Without the running backs performing well, and of course the o-line providing the blocking, the offense would struggle. Consequently more pressure would be placed on Gilbert to get the ball to what sounds to be another concern at WR. I don’t see it my self. Goodwin and Williams provide real threats and I can’t imagine that at least one of the huge pool of incoming FR talent won’t contribute early.

by soonerspeak on Jul 6, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who raised you?!

And why are you so consistently nice & accurate on the BON website, sooner? You’re starting to melt my sooner hatred … until October, atleast.

by robthecob on Jul 6, 2010 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Until Oct..true

I have a niece that is a ut alum so I am somewhat tempered…tainted…whatever. If we loose AGAIN this year I’m sure I will be bitter, but if we win…a certain amount of gloating should be expected.

by soonerspeak on Jul 6, 2010 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Glad to see that salvation has come to your family.

Bitterness … The early 2000s were tough for us too. If the sooners do lose again this year, that may be the final straw to turn you away from the dark side & into the light of righteousness? However, I was wondering if all of your admirable civility might just be a sneaky setup into gloating.

by robthecob on Jul 6, 2010 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely some gloating

but like it’s been said “if your a winner act like you’ve been there before”. The OU-Texas game is one of a handful of unique rivalries in CFB than can drive a fan to the point of bitterness or to obnoxious gloating. Hopefully somewhere in between is where I’ll fall regardless of the outcome (a Sooner victory).

by soonerspeak on Jul 6, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

If? I think you meant "When"

In any event it is funny to see the decent sooners over here. It always surprises me too. This year has been so crazy that I think NU is my new OU.

by Wrangler86 on Jul 6, 2010 9:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not so fast

a team you’ve beat 8 out of 9 times and made run to another conference hardly qualifies as a big rival. Maybe this next game with them will have some flavor though.

by soonerspeak on Jul 6, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love

methinks. You don’t get a lot of that these days.

We should use that word more often…. methinks. he.

"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese

by SwimTexas on Jul 6, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those #7 jerseys...

Could have been AJ White jerseys…

I think it’s WR for the reasons edsp listed above. Don’t have a clue of what’s going to happen there. My hope is that by season’s end Malcolm and Goodwin have proven themselves to be dependable playmakers and someone (anyone) else can step up from time to time a la Brandon Collins in 2008.

by andmyster on Jul 6, 2010 5:43 PM CDT reply actions  

QB

There is no way that QB is not the biggest question mark heading into the fall. Yes, Garrett Gilbert had flashes of brilliance in the National Championship Game. Yes, none of us will ever forget those picture perfect TD passes he threw to Jordan Shipley. Yes, we will never forget than with 3 minutes left and on the back of a freshman QB, the Horns had a chance to win the MNC. What we have forgotten, however, is that QB’s not named Vince or Colt have had a turbulent tenure as the starter at Texas.

Sure, Garrett has talent, but does he have the mental make-up to lead this program, with these expectations on day 1? Has he gelled with his receivers? Will he be able to read coverages? Adjust to blitzes? and most importantly, can he stay healthy?

Over the past three seasons we felt pretty comfortable that we knew what there was to know about Colt McCoy based on his performance in prior years. As seasons passed, our confidence in Colt grew. However, we can’t answer any of the above questions in the affirmative based soley on Garrett Gilbert’s performance at the Rose Bowl. QB is the most important position on the field, and Garrett has yet to start a game.

by BMG on Jul 6, 2010 5:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Not that I disagree...

But in watching the Spring Game. Gilbert looked calm, comfortable, accurate and all the things you need in a QB. Will he be Senior Colt McCoy? No, Probably not but I do believe you will see a lot of brilliance from a proven winner at QB. I have a lot of faith in GG’s ability’s and the spring game only affirmed my feelings.

Now Grant it, It was a spring game. Lot’s of dialed down defense, but, he looked like a different QB from what we saw in the NCG. It looked like everything slowed down for him. He was making defensive reads, Choosing hot routes for recievers, and finding the soft spots in the D’s Secondary.

The only thing that I can think of that is going against him are pure experience.

Garrett Gilbert is My hero!

by mccoy12 on Jul 6, 2010 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

He also has a very green OL against him

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Jul 6, 2010 9:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am less worried

About QB than any other position on offense, and it’s not even close. I’m including TE in there as well. That’s how confident I am in GG. BTW I voted for WR after having flashbacks to the Nebraska and Bama games, but I see both Hales and Davis stepping up huge next season next to Goodwin.

Also, put me in the camp with O-Line. I can’t believe that’s not one of the choices.

by GoHornsGo90 on Jul 6, 2010 10:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I voted WR as well

But I think Kirkendoll can step up well enough. This could well be a running team, but I really just think it’s mostly going to be a defensive team. This program has averaged 35+ points per game at least since 2003, but I think this could be the year that breaks that streak.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Jul 7, 2010 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It is the O-Line plain and simple

whether Texas is dedicated to running the ball or not the line must control the line of scrimmage. We see this basic principle again and again and again. Control the line of scrimmage and you control the game. I am a bit dumbfounded anyone who would worry about the height of Gilbert’s release point would not worry about the lack of a proven right tackle. You don’t get that fixed and his release point is below turf level.

by davey o'brien on Jul 6, 2010 6:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Any Chance

We go after S. Henderson to shore up some of the O-line issues?

by TheBlanton on Jul 6, 2010 9:41 PM CDT reply actions  

UT didn't pursue him before he committed to USC

And I doubt that changes after all this.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Jul 6, 2010 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I voted DL and I don't see how or why so many people voted for RB.

We have all of the RB’s returning that started a game. To me it seems that shouldn’t be a question mark. We know what we have and we have to work with what we got, Yes, we don’t have a stud RB that stands out above the rest, but we do know what we have. DL on the other hand has a bunch of question marks. We’re filling in one of our D-tackles with a RS frosh. Combine that with the fact that all our depth on the line is young and unproven then it seems to me that DL should be a no brainer.

Sports is man's joke on God, You see, God says to man, 'I've created a universe where it seems like everything matters, where you'll have to grapple with life and death and in the end you'll die anyway, and it won't really matter.' So man says to God, 'Oh, yeah? Within your universe we're going to create a sub-universe called sports, one that absolutely doesn't matter, and we'll follow everything that happens in it as if it were life and death.'" - Sam Kellerman

by 2Cor12:9 on Jul 6, 2010 9:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes, but Muschamp lives in the DL's dreams...and the LBs...and the DBs.

Defenses gel much quicker than offenses. OLs take a lot more work, instruction and practice to become a cohesive unit.

For instance, I’ll predict right now we’ll run about 60% of the time, if not more, against Rice and Wyoming. We could pass them blind and put up OU-inflated numbers, but the need is to get the OL plenty of repetitions (both first and second string) and to get it all on film. Then we hit Tech, UCLA and OU in weeks 3-4-5. Texas doesn’t have much margin of error to get the OL into mid-season form and to solve any problems/injuries which might occur.

by whills on Jul 6, 2010 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

D-Line has a bunch of question marks

Every single season. What was the last time they weren’t answered?

by GoHornsGo90 on Jul 6, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

I want to say 2006 or 07, when we had transfers

and suddenly our depth disappeared.

The D-Line situation will be tackled in a post in the near future.

As a unit the Defense has less holes than the offense imho.

As an old coach told me, “every year a new class steps up – you don’t know how they’ll fit and who will be the ones to excel, but there will be players that will fill the holes.” This is ancient football lore, but usually true.

Remember, these kids come to Texas looking for opportunity. One of the real hidden pleasures of viewing two-a-days and practice is that new players always appear.

I think the defense has more capability – and more players – to cover its flaws than the offense, at least early on when we will need them to stabilize the team.

by whills on Jul 7, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with you on the O-line

but we’re one injury away from starting two RS frosh on the DL. Not to mention that Acho will now be getting the majority of attention from opposing OL’s that Sergio got last season. An injury in the backfield and in comes Fozzy, Cody, Whaley… You get my point. An injury or two on either line and we might be in big trouble.

Sports is man's joke on God, You see, God says to man, 'I've created a universe where it seems like everything matters, where you'll have to grapple with life and death and in the end you'll die anyway, and it won't really matter.' So man says to God, 'Oh, yeah? Within your universe we're going to create a sub-universe called sports, one that absolutely doesn't matter, and we'll follow everything that happens in it as if it were life and death.'" - Sam Kellerman

by 2Cor12:9 on Jul 6, 2010 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Injuries are like fumbles...you can't predict them and you must endure them.

It’s a concern but this falls under the heading of destiny.

The one thing that counters those injury concerns is depth.

Fumbles – what can you say – turnovers are the killer.

by whills on Jul 7, 2010 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Really could go any which way, but....

I think you have to be most concerned about QB/WR. This is not to say that I don’t have confidence that GG can step up and be the man, but if you’re looking at this question purely from the standpoint of where the biggest drop off is going to be, you have to think that the departure of “The Roommates” is going to be the biggest difference this year.

On OL, we have three returning starters in Snow, Huey and Hix, all of which have indicated that the new blocking scheme suits them much better than zone blocking. The RBs are all the same we had last year when we went to the championship game (man I hope we get more productivity out of them this year…a subject for another post).

As for the defense, it’s true that you can’t replace Lamarr Houston and The Predator along the line, but I think that Acho and Randall plus newcomers will certainly be able to pick up where we left off, at least at the beginning of the season and get the new guys some reps. At LB, you lose Muckleroy, but from all accounts Dustin Earnest has been lights out in the spring. Put in guys like Acho II and (possibly) Jordan HIcks, and I feel pretty good about the LBs, at least in the sense they should be able to put it together before the RRR and (shudder) Nebraska in Lincoln. No point in talking about the DBs…everyone knows how solid that group is.

Apologies for the long post, but I was trying to avoid being lampooned as a GG hater before the kid even gets a shot. I have faith in the kid, maybe even more faith than I did in McCoy when he took over as a freshman. GG inherits a similar type of team Colt did in 2006, mainly in the sense that both teams are loaded with returning starters (7 on each side of the ball if my count is right) who are coming off of an undefeated regular season and appearance in the championship game. If GG can establish good report with his WRs, I think this season could be every bit as good as 2009.

by ricekelley on Jul 7, 2010 8:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Snow's not really a starter

I mean, I guess he did in spots, but that was by default.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Jul 8, 2010 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

The importance of the O-line is huge, but until we commit to the run, the status of the O-line just doesn’t worry me right now. If we do start running the ball more consistantly, then the O-line shoots up the list. For now, there are 4 or 5 other areas that concern me more. All this said, I still think we have an incredibly talented team this year – but a young one.

"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda

by ElongatedHorn on Jul 7, 2010 12:12 PM CDT reply actions  

How about a little optimism?

GG is the son of a QB that played 8 years in the NFL. Why is anyone worried about what he can do? Did you watch how he handled the ball in the spring game? How he threw? He was 76.9% in completions and he faked the ball better than I’ve seen in a long time. He just needs to stay healthy and he is a big, tough kid. I think he will.

We have another new weapon this year — a TE! Haven’t seen one of those in a while.

We have running backs. Several proven ones and it is too early to lump Whaley with Henry Melton. We also added Traylon Shead. Go watch his videos.

The OL is showing some improvement. Give them a chance. I think we are going to have a great year.

by Jerry@ on Jul 7, 2010 11:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Who said we weren't?

I don’t think anyone in this room expects to win less than 10 games and a CC.

Sports is man's joke on God, You see, God says to man, 'I've created a universe where it seems like everything matters, where you'll have to grapple with life and death and in the end you'll die anyway, and it won't really matter.' So man says to God, 'Oh, yeah? Within your universe we're going to create a sub-universe called sports, one that absolutely doesn't matter, and we'll follow everything that happens in it as if it were life and death.'" - Sam Kellerman

by 2Cor12:9 on Jul 8, 2010 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure if I'm in the same room....

but 10 wins = 2 losses. Pretty tough to win a CC that way. I’m not sure with the conference schedule OU has they would loose two games and I don’t think UT will loose any of their OOC games. Not trying to be argumentative, I just think more than 1 conference loss puts a team out of the conference race.

by soonerspeak on Jul 8, 2010 9:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

Small
Texas Women's Basketball
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Nike helmet redesign
Horns_small
Rivals 100 released
Small
Don't mess with Texas.
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Defense)
Superman_small
Breakdown of Each Position (Offense)
Small
Big 12 Expansion is Back!
Small
Miles Onyegbule...why not TE?
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Early Predictions for Fall Depth Chart (Defense)
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Follow the Bouncing Ball

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8