Texas Open Practice Offensive Quick Hitters
I met up with GoBR at Thursday night's open practice at DKR-TMS and focused mostly on the offense and the competitive passing drills.
I'll just bang these notes out in the order that I took them:
- Malcolm Williams still needs to improve his nerves, specifically the ones between his ears. He's the kind of guy who can turn his body completely around, go up and make a great catch while maintaining body control to drop a foot to the turf before tumbling out of bounds, but somehow becomes an optical illusion when asked to catch a ball in his chest standing still. That said, once the ball is securely in his hands he becomes a good kind of optical illusion - the kind opposing defensive backs dive right through and into the dirt.
- Paden Kelley was working left tackle with the ones today in 11-11 drills. I didn't see Hix yesterday, but I didn't think he was injured. Hopefully there's some competition there, if only to give the OL some reason to keep scraping themselves off the turf.
- Cody Johnson did not look nearly as svelte as I had heard/hoped, but he should be money in his usual role of goal line finisher. I did not see the Jumbo package line up, but I would bet that Randall is our FB in that lineup. CoJo also had a volleyball-set INT on the one play where I saw him asked to try and catch a ball downfield.
- GoBR mentioned Aaron Williams' hit on Mike Davis on a screen. We need to punish screens like that all year, since that's going to be the first place most teams will go to avoid our pass rush. Davis, to his credit, hung on to the ball and popped back up. He also looks polished enough to contribute in spot duty this season. Great hands and attention to detail.
- Darius White (your new #4) looks like Malcolm Williams, Jr. Pure, natural athlete with every tool necessary to stomp some mudholes in opposing defenses, but still needs to learn to focus. One play that stood out had White beat his man by two steps and then slow down to jump for the slightly overthrown ball instead of hitting the jets and diving for it which would have given him a chance. The ball sailed just out of his reach. He had similar (but more pronounced) problems to Malcolm in individual drills with hands. He's young, though, so he's got time.
- I know the defense was GoBR's territory, but I have to mention the fluidity Reggie Wilson showed on his pick 6. I thought he was a linebacker until I caught his number. Me likey.
- DeSean Hales looks good wearing #3. He adjusted beautifully on a deep jump ball and out-jumped A.J. White by almost a foot for a great sideline catch. He may have been out of bounds when he landed but he flashed a lot of true receiver skills and athleticism on that play. Very impressive.
- Chris Jones made an appearance by making a good adjustment on a slightly underthrown sideline pass. He slowed down and slipped the db allowing him to jump and haul it in. Jones also looks speedy.
- I would rate Marquise Goodwin as our best receiver. He's got blazing speed, what-was-that? acceleration, he runs his routes with a purpose, and his hands looked great last night. What more can you say?
- The offensive line was as bad as it was good. Sometimes allowing mass penetration through seemingly every gap, and sometimes forming a perfect pocket around the QB and maintaining for several seconds. Occasionally a few holes opened up, but there was maybe one real break away run on the night (those reporting otherwise weren't paying attention to the number of thuds taken by the ball carrier on his way through the box). The new power play run from under center with the pulling guard I noticed only a few times, and it seemed to have the effect of sliding the entire line of scrimmage towards the sideline without opening anything up. No counters were called today to combat this, but they may not have installed it or may have been focusing on that play. This offense still displays a desperate need for constraint plays to complement our base concepts.
- Kirkendoll made a good adjustment on a back-shoulder throw from Garrett Gilbert that could have been thrown by Drew Brees. Captain Kirk was able to get enough separation while the ball was in flight to elude both his man and the safety help and get a big chunk of YAC.
- Trey Hopkins is still in his stance at left tackle.
- Gilbert looked great overall. His arm is fantastic and he seemed to make smart decisions, though it was tough to follow everyone and he may have been overly conservative. Still, he hit his targets well and the deep balls were usually catchable by either his man or no man. As long as we don't give him the DIY offense that Colt ran the past two seasons, I think he can really develop.
67 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hix
I saw him working at LOT, I am pretty sure he was in when they ran the 5 wide sets with the first 11 on 11 drills.
But, just looking at him he really needs to put on some weight. I am sure he can move with the best of them, but it just does not look like he has a body that is good at getting leverage.
Also, another thought I had about the QBs.
Connor Wood is so much more of a pro prospect then Case is right now. Wood has a very strong arm, he has great hieght and he looks like he could grow up to be a stud. I am little depressed that we only get one season from him if Gilbert stays the next 3 years. He was just impressive from a physical stand point, but when you put him in a 11 on 11 situation its obvious he is a freshman and the speed of the game is just a little to far ahead of him at the moment.
Anyways, good stuff HB. :)
Hook 'em
I also like Connor
His arm looked stronger and his body looks like Colt McCoy sophomore year. I’m sure he’ll be ready if Gilbert steps out after next year.
Thanks, BK.
I wouldn't think that either is a pro prospect right now
But really, I guess there was a time when the same would’ve been said about Snead vis a vis McCoy.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 14, 2010 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Something that impressed me with Gilbert
One of the first plays in 11 on 11 when they were in the 5 wide set.
The defense came with 6 or 7 and the line did not pick it up, Gilber did not panic at all, but he made a quick read and hit either Chiles or Malcom for a little short 3 or 4 yard gain. A very simple idea in theory, but the fact that he was composed and was willing to accept just 3 yards instead of forcing something was huge.
Hook 'em
I didn't catch Gilbert making a mistake
By the end of practice, I’d decided that if any defense gives Gilbert three seconds in the pocket to pick and choose one of our freakish athletes downfield, he’s going to punish them for it.
He made good decisions and was accurate.
Now if I could only be confident that he would get those three seconds…
No mention of John Chiles?
I thought he was BY FAR the most impressive player at practice today. Never bobbled a ball (M. Davis was having some trouble with this, though he always caught them—maybe that’s just how he catches stuff?) and was the security blanket for the second day in a row. He’s also in damn good shape. Plus he looked like he cared for the first time since he’s stepped on campus. I was really impressed!
I agree
Chiles looks like he has a new lease on life, like a new man. I am pretty pumped about the WRS.
Hook 'em
What I know is... that with Chiles, Goodwin, M. Williams, Kirkendoll, and M. Davis on the roster....
SOMEONE’S going to be open.
You couldn’t go back 3-4 years and pick a better set of receivers to recruit.
Chiles looked much improved
But he made a lot of money today by facing Gideon. That long TD was nice, but looked like a blown coverage. As it always is with Chiles, it’s wait and see. He has always had potential.
He's finally in WR shape again (size and speed)
He gained a good bit of weight while trying to be a QB.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Dear Mayan God...
…if you send Texas the Offensive equivalent of Boom I will sacrifice two jaguars, four people, and a shitload of Sooners in your honor.
Por favor and gracias.
by KevinJ on Aug 13, 2010 2:36 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
That would be sick
Undefeated every season IMO. Literally impossible to lose barring something like an epidemic on the team.
Not sure it exists right now
Maybe Gus Malzahn, but I think his playbook is a little too based on trick plays. I used to think Norm Chow was good. Meyer, obviously, but he doesn’t fit the OC position. Sarkisian, but again he’s a HC. Dana Holgerson (sp?) that just went to OSU perhaps?
by GoHornsGo90 on Aug 14, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
thats fine
my point is no matter how much we criticize Greg Davis, at the end of the day/year, we usually have no trouble scoring points. Apart from these last two years, we have had a decent running game and a very good offensive line. And all of a sudden, we want to blame the coaching? They might have made mistakes in recruiting but I think our offensive coaching is on par with our defense’s. People are also quick to point the finger at OL coach Mac McWhorter. This is the same person who coached Kasey Studdard, Lyle Sendlein and Justin Blalock. Given how outstanding Greg Davis has been in developing QBs, I would not ask for any one else.
His deficiencies are definitely in play calling and I think he has a few things to learn from the people mentioned above.
That's a great point
I’ve been saying approximately the same thing, and I really don’t think the echo-chamber of Davis criticism on here and BC has been justified at all. He’s not perfect, but he’s probably among the five most successful OCs over the past ten years, isn’t he? I don’t think the same can even be said of Muschamp at DC…yet.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 14, 2010 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions
lol wat?
looks like we found a sunshine pumper. GD cannot scheme a running game to save his life. The only times our ground attack has ever worked was when a transcendent talent existed in the backfield. GDGD has “no trouble scoring points” against teams who we out-talent by large degrees. When faced with equal talent or against a defense with above average competence, our shit falls apart. Run game success under GD has been and always will be based solely on the pure ability of the runner. It’s the exact opposite of the Denver Broncos.
Complaining that he is “bad” at play calling completely ignores the fact that the play sucked at the moment of inception. I belly laughed at the idea that despite our ground game sucking for the last two years it’s not GD’s fault! Besides, GD is (A) a good enough play caller, and (B) play calling is vastly overrated by fans – in actuality it’s just second guessing. Further reading:
http://smartfootball.com/grab-bag/is-coaching-overrated
http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2007/01/rock-paper-scissors-edgar-allan-poe-and.html
To answer the question, I would say Urban Meyer is Muschamp’s offensive equivalent.
yes but what makes a 'transcendent talent'
So are you saying that a GD running game depends primarily on the RB and no one else? Is that why during those ‘glory’ years of running the football, 3 out of the 5 players on those lines are starters in the NFL right now?
I am not saying that GD should not be blamed about the last two years. He should and rightfully so. But to question his coaching ability and to say that he is worth getting replaced(over just these two years) is absolutely ludicrous. He may have made mistakes in evaluating that talent but I still believe he is an outstanding coach.
If you can sit here and say that we only succeed on offense because of our talent disparity with the other team, why can I not say that Muschamp can only succeed on defense when he has players like Kindle, Orakpo and Thomas in his arsenal? To succeed as a team at this level, you need two things. Good coaching AND good talent for your schemes. If you do not succeed, you can not blame one factor alone. As much as we would like to say we are Texas, I have no qualms about pointing the finger at talent. People say ‘We are Texas’, our talent must be great so it MUST be the coaching, but I ask; why can’t it not be the talent(or lack there of)? We have had so many 5-star players go through our university, yet not all of them were even starters(Eddie Jones and Trey Allen come to mind). I think recruiting is a much bigger guessing game than people think on these boards. They get all dazzled by the HS highlights and automatically assume that if the player does not do well in college it has to be the coaching. Yet when a 2-star or 3-star player does well and makes it big, they just attribute it to “not much video”, small school etc. On these boards, people tend to do that a lot more with offense than defense.
Your post is exactly what Mack likes to point out every off season. When the team does well, it’s because of the talent of the players, but when they do not, it is because of the coaching.
I think Muschamp is still in his honey moon period in these parts. When we have a bad game(against A&M) everybody is quick to console each other by saying,’it’s Muschamp, he will figure it out’; yet for some weird reason, everybody seems to be praying that Greg Davis has his brain in order when the season starts. It seems when Blake Gideon whiffs on Terrelle Pryor during the Fiesta Bowl last year, it’s because Gideon sucks. Why are people not saying that Muschamp called a bad play? Doesn’t he know that Gideon is not good in coverage? Yet when Monroe fumbles the ball during a shovel pass in NCG game, most people are quick to blame Davis’ bad play calling(which I probably agree with) but not many are quick to point the finger at Monroe. Every time our offense does something bad these days, its Greg Davis’ fault yet when Chykie Brown blows a coverage, it’s in his head.
Difference IMO
If you can sit here and say that we only succeed on offense because of our talent disparity with the other team, why can I not say that Muschamp can only succeed on defense when he has players like Kindle, Orakpo and Thomas in his arsenal?
Here is the difference IMO.
Look at the running game stats for games between when Rickly left and VY started. Heck, look at Benson’s individual yards per carry pre-VY. Both stats were average until the exact game VY became the starter, when they suddenly went up dramatically. Between those periods the running game was downright bad against any good teams, and particularly OU (rememeber not being able to run against UNT because they had 1 good DT?) 2006 and 2007 had pretty good stats, but even then there was not a consistent running game (“being able to pick up 3 when you need it” – Mack’s quote) which was a big reason for ending the regular season with losses against KSU and A&M.
Now look at the defense prior to Muschamp. It was pretty good early under Reese (pre-spread) and then for a single season under Robinson. For the most part same quality althetes under all the DC’s (and in 2007 almost the exact same players). Then Muschamp appears and suddenly we have a dominating defense.
One instance coincides with players and the other coincides with the coach.
by Horncasting on Aug 15, 2010 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
you might have made good points about Benson and VY, those were a long time ago and the stats you refer to can not be found in box scores. I will have to trust you on that.
However, when it comes to A&M and KSU I have to say you are wrong. Our running game in those two games was pretty solid(113 and 127 yards rushing respectively and single digit negative rushing yards). In both games we scored two rushing TDs each so I have a hard time believing that we lost those two games because of our rushing attack. I watched both games and in my memory the numerous volleyball interceptions, poor special teams and defensive play(Jordy Nelson burned us a bunch of times in the KSU game) were the reasons we lost those games.
When it comes to Muschamp, one can definitely argue that he had two future first rounders in Thomas and Orakpo during his first year. However, at the end of the day, I know Muschamp is an outstanding coach and I do not want to detract from that. Your response will probably be that these players became elite players because of Muschamp. Why then can we not say the same about all the numerous offensive players that have made it to the NFL? Why don’t we say that it’s because of Davis’ coaching that these players were placed in a position to succeed? It seems when our offensive players make it to the NFL, it’s because of their talent but when it’s defensive players, it’s not only their talent but their coaching.
This is even more evident during the live threads during games. When we score it is because of Player X being a badass and when we do not it’s immediately Greg Davis fault for a bad play call. It must have been years since I have seen people actually say Davis’ has done a good job.
Stats are easy to find on Mack's site
During the Simms era Benson had a 4.4 YPC average (4.2 for his entire soph year) with 12 TD’s in each of those years. In 2003 with Mock as the starter his YPC was 4.2. He finished 2003 with a YPC of 5.6 Through 6 games with Mock as the starter he had 390 yards. Through the next 6 with VY as the starter he had almost 1,000 yards. In 2004 with a full year of VY as the starter his YPC jumped to 5.6.
The point regarding the KSU and A&M games in 2006 was that if there was a running game that could have gotten 1 yard, we wouldn’t have had to QB sneak 3 times in a row, resulting in Colt’s injury. Against KSU the total of 143 yards looks ok, until you see that it took 45 carries to get it (3.2 YPC). Against A&M, with a big emphasis on running the ball, we got 70 yards on 25 carries (2.8 YPC). Both of those were against unranked teams with below average defenses.
Regarding Davis as a coach, I give him FULL credit for changing the offenses to fit the players strengths (and hiding his own weaknesses in the running game) and for doing a fantastic job with the QB’s since he has been at Texas.
You keep making my points for me, so I find it hilarious that you keep fighting about the greatness that is GD.
(1) In the ‘glory years’ (‘04, ’05) of our run game we had VY plus Benson/Ramonce, and then Charles, plus 4 NFL quality linemen. Studdard, Sendlein, Blalock, and Scott are all still in the league and in 2009 they totaled 54 starts among them. We were talented out the ass. So much so that a drunken trained monkey could have designed an effective run game. In fact, we had the simplest run game in all college football. We were just fortunate to have it combined with obscene WMD levels of talent. To pretend that this is somehow a validation of GD’s ability to concoct run schemes is insane. Especially when you consider…
(2) The next 4 years of our run game. 2006-2009 was an abortion. The brief success we had in ‘07 was based SOLELY on Charles’ ability. Everything else was abysmal.
(3) Your Longhorn card should be pulled for comparing Coach Boom to GDGD. As wretched as the run game was, our defensive coaching was even worse in ‘06 and ’07. Coach Boom took over players he didn’t recruit in a system mired in failure, and made them the best D in the conference. Orakpo doubled his career sack total after Muschamp’s arrival. Roy Miller quadrupled his. Henry Melton turned into a valuable contributor. Kindle went from two disappointing years riding the train to bustville to double digit sacks. Muschamp turned Muckelroy into an all conference linebacker. He turned Lamarr Houston into a first day draft pick. These guys were going nowhere until Boom showed up.
Greg Davis’ run offense succeeds in spite of Greg Davis, while Muschamp’s defense succeeds because of his ability to max out talent. Since Boom showed up, we’ve only lost two games. Both of those were due to miserable crap happening on the offensive side of the ball. You can count on one finger the number of times that Muschamp’s D hasn’t shown up. I run out of digits if I try counting up all the times that our run game or offense no showed.
I am not saying that Davis is the greatest coach ever, all I am saying is that he does not deserve the treatment he receives on these boards:
a. The point you try to make is like the chicken and egg conundrum. Is it the scheme(i.e. coaching) that allowed these linemen to succeed or is their talent alone? I think it’s both and I challenge you to prove me otherwise.
2006 and 2007 were not bad in terms of our running game at all. 2008 and 2009 definitely were and can you honestly say it is purely because of coaching and not our talent at those positions. Referring to reply, I believe that there are two factors for a successful team, GOOD coaching AND good ELITE talent. Either of the two is just not enough. You have played right into my argument by blaming everything on coaching and nothing on talent. Can you prove to me that the talent in our running game is just as good as bad coaching/scheme is what is setting them back?c. I completely agree with you when you say that Muschamp is the reason why those players are in the NFL. But why can’t we say the same thing about Chris O, McCoy, Shipley and Cosby being drafted(mind you I have chosen only players where you seem to say that our offense has been crap against good teams). Why can’t we not say GD has maximized their potential?
d. The two times we lost in the past two years is not only because of our running game. In fact in 2008, you can easily argue that we lost because of our defense in the Tech game and our defense at key moments in the Alabama game(the 49 yard rush by Richardson comes to mind). Also, during the Alabama game, we did lose our QB. Maybe that hurt just a teeny weeny bit. Oh wait, in the Tech game in 2008 we lost Orakpo and we lost that game too. Regarding this point you made I think we can go on forever pointing fingers at each game and point to stats to bolster our opinions.
Which comes to my main point: GD oversees the entire offense and not just the RBs or OL alone. Our perceived deficiencies in these two areas can not be directly blamed on bad coaching because there are just way too many factors. When Chykie Brown or Blake Gideon blows a coverage why are we not blaming Muschamp or Akina? But when the OL shits a brick against Suh and Nebraska it is because of Davis. What about our WRs and QBs? Why aren’t their successes not attributed to Davis ‘maxing out their talent’?
2006 and 2007 were not bad in terms of our running game at all
In neither year could we run the ball when we wanted or needed to. It was break a long run on get loss or very small gain. See the 2006 KSU and A&M games for examples of when we need to run and couldn’t.
you can easily argue that we lost because of our defense in the Tech game
I’m not going to say the defense doesn’t shoulder its share of the blame, but not being able to run the ball out of our own end zone to start the game made for a poor start. Also keep in mind that the final point difference was less than the 9 points the offense gave Tech.
defense at key moments in the Alabama game(the 49 yard rush by Richardson comes to mind).
The defense was absolutely stoning Alabama until the lack of faith in Gilbert and total lack of a running game put the defense out there for the entire second quarter. Offense was also directly responsible for 14 Bama points. Defense played well enough to win despite getting very little help in terms of TOP.
Two cents
Maybe Gus Malzahn…Dana Holgerson (sp?) that just went to OSU perhaps? -GoHornsGo90
Gag, and Holgerson has 1 bowl game as an OC to his name
Apart from these last two years, we have had a decent running game and a very good offensive line. -thebrat
You can’t in all honesty believe this
I think our offensive coaching is on par with our defense’s. -the brat
Let’s be honest, head-to-head who would you be more willing to lose?
Now I am no Greg Davis hater, in fact I’m more of an apologist, the team averages a ton of points, yards, etc. I know all the stats. But what about a game-planning for teams you cant “out-talent” or “out-athlete”? Nebraska and OU had no trouble stoning our offense last year.
Obvious retort: “BUT WE WON THOSE GAMES OWEN!”
I don’t like winning games that way.
And btw lets give about 80 pts from last year to defense and special teams if we are going to be fair.
According to Mack's presser...
The offensive line is at a disadvantage during practice because they are not allowed to cut block. The reason for that limitation is the potential for an injury.
So basically the dline can make bolder moves because they have no worry of being cut-block. Word is that our scheme will require LOTS of cut-blocking.
So this is a huge disadvantage. Looks like the jury will be out on our Oline until the season starts.
by Orangechipper on Aug 14, 2010 7:44 AM CDT up reply actions
That makes sense, I guess
And the reasoning is justified. But it sucks that the offensive line could potentially rely heavily on the very cut-blocking technique the linemen don’t actually get to use much, if at all, in practice. That really seems like a disadvantage. It’s like having a great play drawn up and never practicing it before employing it in a game.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 14, 2010 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions
there are drills for cut-blocking
using dummies which obviously is no where close to live people but it’s something.
we could get the greatest offensive mind in the history of the game
And Mack still wouldn’t willing to part with GD
Visit my blog on all things college football, Pigskin Phenom.
something missing
i haven’t read a single comment about an impressive outing by an O-Lineman. not even one lineman stood out? hopefully they can pull it together.
"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.
Line did not look bad...
When Texas lined up under center it seemed the line was a lot better.
Not as much sidways movement, a lot of straight forward blocking.
Hook 'em
I'm still out on the O-line
I couldn’t have counted the “sacks” on one hand, and maybe not even two. For every play they held up well, they let someone through twice. Good news is, when they held up, GG hit them for 20+ yards.
Gilbert was pretty good at recognizing and adjusting for blitzes.
Hard to know if the run game is working, as the LB’s weren’t really tackling which might have made the RB’s look better.
The offense will live and die on that O-Line.
Paden Kelley
Just abused Dustin Earnest on a reverse when he didn’t see it coming. You like to see that kind of maliciousness in the big guys. Stay tuned.
I don't give a crap what he does after the whistle
During the play, I want everyone to be Tevin “I want to kill everybody” Jackson.
Interesting.
So it didn’t bother you in the least to see our O-Line not helping up their own QB when he was losing his anal virginity during the Nebraska game? Got-cha.
Not if he waves as Suh passes by during the play
He’s obviously worthless anyway, what do I care if he has accountability?
Regardless of whether said player is worthless or not
They were all still playing in the game, so you can’t pull that card. You’re right, since they’re already scum we should just make the QB pay for their idiocy and not have them help him up.
by GoHornsGo90 on Aug 14, 2010 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions
Dude
What am I supposed to do about it? Something’s obviously wrong with our OL, but making them pick up Colt after he gets sacked isn’t going to fix anything. Everyone focuses on that but it’s a symptom not a cause. We need to get some more Kasey Studdard types in there with an attitude problem.
Exactly, HB.
After this season, we should have a very clear bead on those mean nasties. There will be no question about scheme (aside from normal static). The general attitude of the team is getting meaner, led by the defense at this point, who, I’m sure, are no fun to go up against every day.
Nothing about RB....
…am I missing something, but I have read nothing about RBs, except the bit about Cody? I was wondering how Tre and the others did…
by vanterminatorhorn on Aug 13, 2010 3:40 PM CDT reply actions
BTW
You can catch the MB-TF video of last night’s practice (with Muschamp’s interview) here:
http://www.texassports.com/allaccess/?media=185335
In it, you can see Muschamp’s much talked about ZROC hood-design-style sweater, as well as a sick hit by A. Williams.
RE: the jumbo package
I’m pretty sure I read somewhere (wish I recalled where) that the jumbo package will NOT have a DT lining up at fullback, like Roy Miller did a few years ago, and I think Lamarr Houston did last season. Don’t know why.
Sad but true.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
That would be a shame
My favorite part of the jumbo scheme was purely to watch the DT. They abeso-freaking-lutely LOVED to blow someone up when they got in there on O.
Roy especially.
I know he was a high motor guy on D, but it was like a whole nother engine when he got to pop defenders in the mouth.
Loved it.
by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 13, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions
If I was making decisions
I would not put my best (only?)DT in danger just to run a play for kicks
And that is why you could not be a coach at Texas
Texas Fans: “We want to see more trick plays! Double reverse pass!”
Owenh: “I’m not making my 5 star future Pro-Bowl QB block for five seconds so my converted WR can chuck the ball into coverage!”
Texas Fans: “You’re too conservative!”
DT as FB
Seems like it started with Lokey, then Miller, then Houston. Lokey caught a TD pass on a goal line play. Miller dropped one on an identical play (OU 2008 maybe?). Was surprised they never called the same play for Houston since he was a RB in highschool and probably has the best hands of the bunch.
Agree with Owenh about not using Randall. Not only is he the only proven DT, but he seems too tall for the job. If you are just looking for a big strong body, why not use one of the young DT’s or gazillion DE’s.
by Horncasting on Aug 14, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
OFFTOPIC
On Ncaa 2011 (ps3) is there a way to look at your online game history, as in the scores of all the games you have played against opponents?
OFFTOPIC
Do you prefer Chinese food or Italian food?
"You never lose a game if the opponent doesn't score." - Darrell Royal
by BMC237 on Aug 13, 2010 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I like both, both since im Chinese (which is what im guessing you were taking a stab at...)
..Ill say Chinese
But seriously. Does anyone know? I didnt want to make a new fanpost/shot and the ps3 threads were buried in new topics.
I don't think he just randomly guessed
That you are Chinese.
by GoHornsGo90 on Aug 14, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
No I wasn't, threw out to random food types
"You never lose a game if the opponent doesn't score." - Darrell Royal
by BMC237 on Aug 14, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions
This sentence has all kinds of fail..
"You never lose a game if the opponent doesn't score." - Darrell Royal
by BMC237 on Aug 14, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions
What kind of food do you think I prefer?
Correct!… Seafood!. Fish Tacos, Crab Burritos and Shrimp Enchiladas
Cause I’m Aquaman!
Wha...? No Whaley? No Hills?
by Ese-De-SA on Aug 14, 2010 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Time Warner!?!
Time warner is threatening to take away my espn channels on sept. 2nd. They have done this in the past and always came to an ageement with the netwoks they are in dispute with. I hope so this year I dont want to miss any football and dont want to cancel because I have the Bevod channel. I am watching the Rice game at my buddies house but the rest of the season I refuse to go without my college football on the espn networks. Why right before the season starts? Why could’nt they do it in the spring and miss bowling and sooner catfish wresting season. I guess I might find myself at the bar alot paying $6 a beer.
That sucks..
Dish Network is having similar issues with Disney. We lost ESPNewsHD a while back. Still haven’t been able to get ESPNUHD. Dish is now tied up in court with Disney so I don’t see us getting those two channels I mentioned above anytime soon. Hopefully you’ll have better luck on Time Warner.

by 
































