Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Africa Cup Of Nations Semifinal: Black Stars Ripe For Upset?

Texas Longhorns Football 2010: The Narrative

Last year, it was simple: "Pasadena or bust." There was so much to win, but just as much to lose. And for a few shocking, paralyzing moments, which saw Bo Pelini's arms raised to the sky in triumph, we tasted the horror. Fortunately, Hunter Lawrence got a chance, the players got to dog pile, and the fans got to take another trip to the Rose Bowl.

Even though the title game didn't turn out as we hoped, the season was a success. Although the way it went down -- losing McCoy five plays into the game -- surely helped ease the burden of defeat, I suspect that even more important to that acceptance were our experiences from the near-misses early in Mack's tenure. The 2001 Big 12 Championship. The 2004 shutout in the Red River Shootout. This time, we got there, to the national title game, and that's all you can really ask for. Sometimes you're going to pull out a 41-38. Sometimes it's all going to go wrong. Someone's gotta lose, but only the two teams who are playing have a chance to win.

Looking back, it can almost feel dirty to think about the disconnect between Mack Brown's successes during his first seven seasons and our discontentment as fans -- as though we were a bunch of entitled brats ungrateful for our comforts. But that's the difference between winning 10 games and winning the conference (at least as far as Texas fans are concerned, that counts 2008, systemic foolishness be damned), and it's only in achieving the latter that Mack Brown could begin to earn credit for the former.

LEGACIES ON THE LINE

At this point, the goals for the program are now the same every year: win the conference, be competitive for a shot at the national title. The only variation is in the degree of urgency attached to achieving them. To fall short last season would have seemed calamitous; this year feels much more like 2008.

Star-divide

Two years ago it was clear that the stars were aligning for a national title run in 2009, making the '08 season as much about preparing to maximize that opportunity as anything else. Thanks to McCoy, we almost got there a year early, while by season's end the defense had taken the big steps forward needed for a Pasadena run.

It looks to me like the stars are once again aligning for a national title run a year from now. The only difference is that this time, it won't be a shock if Texas gets there early. The 'Horns will field a top five defense, and if the offense is above average when it counts the most, this team can run the regular season table.

But that is the story this year -- the offense. The narrative 2010 is about Greg Davis, Mack Brown, and offense. After 2008, Will Muschamp had developed a championship caliber defense, they have one again this year, and will for the foreseeable future. It is the offense that stalled last year, and it is the offense which must develop this year. And if we want to be grand about it, the success or failure of the endeavor will play a defining role in both Mack Brown and Greg Davis's legacies at Texas.

Texas need not get there this year. Garrett Gilbert is a first-year starter. The offensive line is thin, its most promising players young. Next year's receiving corps can be special, but it may take most of this season to sort out. And the scheme is in transition.

On that last count, my Fozzy fantasies are just that. I may love the kid, but this is the year of Cody Johnson, as we prepare for the era of Malcolm Brown. It won't be the end of the world if Texas loses games this year if along the way there's meaningful progress and development on offense to set up next year. Next year, Gilbert will be a junior with a full season of starting experience. The offensive line will start to look like an asset, with better depth. Malcolm Williams, Marquis Goodwin, Mike Davis, DeSean Hales, D.J. Monroe, and Darius White will be a frightening group. If a piano hasn't fallen on his head by then, Barrett Matthews will be a terrific weapon at H-back.

And forget Thunder and Lightning: if Mack Brown and Greg Davis succeed in the challenge before them this year, Texas next season will be hammering opponents with both Cody Johnson and Malcolm Brown. Thunder and Thunder. Good luck in the 4th quarter, defenses. And with stopping Garrett Gilbert on play action.

There's your narrative. Play to win this year, but however things play out, get this offense in gear for next season.

Oh, and retain the Boom. By God, whatever it takes... retain the motherf**ng Boom.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree with your viewpoint on our expectations.

There is a thin fine line between what we say we are expecting and what we are actually expecting in the secret confines of our thoughts. While we truly are satisfied with nothing short of a National Championship each year, you have to admit that our expectations for 2008 paled in comparison to those for last year. It was as you said, “Pasadena or Bust.” I feel that the excitement surrounding our team this year stems from the fact that we have a new captain in GG who is leading a new team in a new direction. Surely there will be a few growing pains along the way, but I rest confident in my belief that despite our achievements this year, the motto plastered across our blog and social networking posts throughout 2011 will be “New Orleans or Bust”.

by ElMariachiLoco on Aug 24, 2010 9:38 AM CDT reply actions  

The Boom

At this point, I’m fairly certain that he’s playing for the promotion. He and Mack clearly have some kind of understanding, or he probably would have jetted for the many mils at other UT. That understanding is probably something along the lines of “I’ll retire after 2016 at the latest, earlier if I feel like it, or whenever we win another title.”

If that’s the case, I don’t worry too much about losing him… Not the kind of dude to back down from a challenge.

by Tackchevy on Aug 24, 2010 9:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Not worried either

As I wrote in this year’s football annual, there are more reasons than not to believe he’s right where he wants to be.

That said, at this point it can’t really be said enough: HE MUST STAY FOREVER AND EVER AMEN.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Aug 24, 2010 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm thinking the "winning another title" scenario is realistic.

I just think Boom has too much fun dominating the other teams’ offenses to want to hit the road. And like you said, if he was gonna leave, he would have done so already.

by ElMariachiLoco on Aug 24, 2010 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Im not so optimistic

UGA will be my second favorite team this year. I will be rooting very hard for them.

Vince Young = Greatness

by PineypointG on Aug 24, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hmm...

Interesting take. Your offense is going to be pretty nasty next year. Who will most likely be gone off the D?

I can’t decide if OU should have higher expectations this year or next…

The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
SB Nation Denver

by Jon Woods on Aug 24, 2010 9:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Higher than last year?

or higher than their current pre-season rank?

by ElMariachiLoco on Aug 24, 2010 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Defense

We’re green on the corners: we lose the Browns (Curtis and Chykie) and likely Aaron Williams. Christian Scott is also a flight risk if he has a monstrous season (see: Earl Thomas).

We lose Sam Acho and Eddie Jones off the ends. However, our 2-deep next year is Alex Okafor, Dravannti Johnson, Jackson Jeffcoat, Reggie Wilson. Scipio thinks this is an upgrade.

Kheeston Randall may bolt with a huge season, but we’re expecting major development from our young DT’s such as Dorsey, Bible, Howell. Plus, Tolleson is the coach, so not too worried here.

At LB, Jared Norton and Dustin Earnest leaves the middle, but that’s not currently a position of extreme importance in our D. Keenan Robinson could also leave after a big year, but we have Jordan Hicks waiting in the wings.

Besides corner, it doesn’t really seem like there’s a big concern about how stout our D will be next year.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not at all

Lot of youth, but a ton of talent. Thanks.

The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
SB Nation Denver

by Jon Woods on Aug 24, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Corners

Hopefully we can get some big leads in games so the young CBs get a lot of playing time this year. Not that they’d be playing against great competition, but I’m sure every little bit helps.

by TxHorns989 on Aug 24, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Aaron Williams is gone

No question about it. Dude is ready to play in the NFL now.

Worried about losing Randall because he is going to have a big season as ong as he stays healthy.

Agree that the major concern is cornerback, but the good news is that Vaccaro looked good in the nickel, Adrian Phillips flashed a bit, and the coaches have said some good things about Carrington Byndom. Adrian White already made his mark in the spring — the cornerback position next year will lack experience, but there is reason for confidence at this point due to the information coming out of camp.

by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Aug 24, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

NFL Lockout

how do you think this will affect our players?

by billb on Aug 24, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I.E.

Peter said that while UT will be good this year, you guys should be even better next year.

We lose DeMarco, most likely Broyles, Stephenson, Beal, Taylor, Carter and Nelson but that’s about it.

Im cant decide if should expect the ’10 Sooners or the ’11 Sooners to be better.

The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
SB Nation Denver

by Jon Woods on Aug 24, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm intrigued by '11 Texas and '11 OU as well

I know it’s early, but just to project. See the skill positions:

QB: I think UT fans are rightly more excited about the potential of Gilbert than OU fans are about Jones. This year is obviously crucial in both of their developments.

RB: It sounds like 5* Calhoun has been a disappointment so far, but fans are excited about Roy Finch. Meanwhile, Texas fans are amped like no other for the arrival of Malcolm Brown.

WR: If Broyles leaves, it’s Kenny Stills and a bunch of flotsam. Meanwhile, Texas has Goodwin, Mal Williams (if he stays), and Mike Davis/Darius White.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think there will be some competition next year

at the QB position from the Bell kid, although Landry could solidify his position this year. At WR Broyles is probably gone, but Stills is for real, Miller and Jaz Reynolds are pretty good and we’ll have the Metoyer kid coming in. RB should be fine after Murry with J. Miller, Finch, Clay and incoming Brandon Williams. This is Calhoun’s make or break year. O-line seems like it’s getting better, but remains to be seen. There is also some talent coming up at TE. On defense our LB should be outstanding for a while. Losing Beal will hurt because he is so consistently good, but some good talent behind him with King and the Kansas FR Grissom. We need to recruit some more talent at DT for the future, but this year and next should be Okay. We’re going to be young in the secondary next year, but Demontre Hurst, Gabe Lynn, Jefferson and FR corner Colvin look solid. UT has definitely recruited talent as well so the RRS should be excellent for years to come. Wouldn’t want it any other way.

by soonerspeak on Aug 24, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Did you see him in the celebrity/pros flag football game? Kid has an arm.

by NeTexHorn on Aug 24, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup

The two quarterbacks were Montana & K. Warner. When a team scored a touchdown, to go for two you had to use a celebrity quarterback. Every time “Landry’s” team scored he was the quarterback for the 2 pt conversion. They said he played qb in high school. You could definitely tell he knew how to throw a ball.

by NeTexHorn on Aug 27, 2010 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Come on now

No Friday Night Lights thread is complete without Minka Kelly.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1000

"We call him The Hammer." - Bob Stoops on Ronnell Lewis

by jtesooner on Aug 24, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

OU should be excited for this year, if only because they have to be… Texas appears to have some weaknesses here and there, and most of those will be gone next time around, with the exception of greenery at CB.

Further, if OU drops this one, that will be five of the last six, well on the way to six of seven. With both schools recruiting strong but Texas getting a little better of it in the last two years, OU would need a “VY Event” to keep some balance between the schools going into the middle of the decade.

So in any case, important game for sure. If I were a gambling man, which I am, I would give the Horns a 55-45 edge or so, but that’s about it.

by Tackchevy on Aug 24, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Plus, its not only Texas taking a slight step back

But the rest of the conference as well. Not a strong year for the conference. I agree, this year’s RRS should be a blast.

The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
SB Nation Denver

by Jon Woods on Aug 24, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not a strong year?

While I agree with you, we do have three teams in the pre-season top 10.

I only see two of them finishing in the top 10.

"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite

by Sunkist on Aug 24, 2010 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love the potential on this team. It’s hard to be “under the radar” at #4/#5 in the polls, but the low expectations you read from a lot of the punditry set the table for an especially surprising year. The only thing standing between this team and a perfect season is their own development, chemistry, and composure.

They really do have a good chance of being a stronger team than last year, a team which, in many ways was the strongest in the land, even if they often refused to show it.

Just a few more days to go now…

by Tackchevy on Aug 24, 2010 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

Expectations are incomplete without an examination

of our opponents. It’s great to understand your points of our new O and signal caller with our thin front line. For me, at least expectations wise, it would depend on our opponents and our schedule and a complete look at our schedule with matchups would be helpful to analyze our narrative.

Should this team beat the 2010 NU or OU teams? Are they having “rebuilding years” as well? Is Aggy on the rise and catching us so to speak, at what should be our weakest point in the next 3-5 years? If we’re talking about expectations it also depends on the opposing teams in relation to ours not just what our team’s expectations should be.

Yee-haw!!!

by UT2001 on Aug 24, 2010 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

I think another part of the narrative is:

Do we want to get there a year early? I mean, obviously we do—anytime you can play for a National Championship, it’s gravy. And this year is a wide-open race.

Maybe a better question is, do we want to get there a year early if we’re not completely prepared to play for the Championship? What happens if we make it and lose? Is there a perception that we’re an “Ohio State” or “Oklahoma”—strong regular seasons followed by continual post-season losses?

When you consider that:

A. IF Muschamp stays, the defense is likely to suffer no significant drop-off (except potentially at the CB position); see my response to Jon above.

B. IF Gilbert develops as expected, 2011 will be “his year.”

C. We likely lose no “skill position” player of significance (with potentially the exception of John Chiles), and would likely have an influx of talent in Malcolm Brown and developing Mike Davis and Darius White
.
D. The offensive line will likely increase in talent and experience, as the Mason Walters, etc. class will have had a chance to develop, and the depth will be built back up with the past two classes (Hopkins, Espinosa, and likely Westerman and/or Greenlea).

Given that the narrative lines up favorably for 2011, would a loss in a 2010 National Championship game make it extremely difficult to build up to a 2011 National Championship win?

My immediate gut reaction is no. I think if we can have the opportunity to play for one this year, it makes much more sense than “hoping and praying” for next year (see: 2008 OU to 2009 OU). Second, the negative perception of Ohio State and OU hasn’t really hurt their pre-season ranks (see: 2010 OSU and OU).

But I’d like to hear some thoughts from the crowd.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 10:06 AM CDT reply actions  

Running out the door

But you answered your own question. The news cycle runs fast and short. Nothing to lose by playing for it all, even if we’re ahead of schedule.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Aug 24, 2010 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks

Thirdly, I expect Year 3 Boom to be fully operational for whatever team he plays. The question is Gilbert’s development and whether the O-line gels. I assume if we’re in the 2010 MNC, both of those will have happened.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't buy the concept that one season leads into another

That there’s a carryover effect. That’s a creation of reporters looking for a storyline — and coaches looking for something to say.

If we play for the MNC this year and lose, it’s a plus for next year. If we should happen to win it all this year, we become the target store for next year. (I’d be fine with either.) I see little value in losing EVER. I think you can learn from losing but you learn more from winning — what got you there and what it takes to do it again.

I’m certain we don’t beat USC if we haven’t had the experience of rallying to beat Ohio State and Oklahome State earlier that season, and Oklahoma State, Aggie, Michigan and Kansas the year before.

by edsp on Aug 24, 2010 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hate to be the parade-pisser,

but flip it upside down. Say we lose three games this year…will that be ok in preparation for “our year” in 2011? I think PB’s thought about the short news cycle applies here too and we should be ok. Assuming, of course, that the losses are ‘constructive’ and the players learn something from them. The scariest thing about youth is the snowball effect that negative results could bring. Damn, I’m just a bucket of sunshine today. Can we please kick the shit out of Rice soon?

41-38 !!

by JoeT63 on Aug 24, 2010 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

2008 Reduex

I see this team nearly as talented as the ’08 squad but with slightly higher expectations the national scene. On a side note I saw a great post earlier that said if we had to lose one game, we should lose at Nebraska and then rematch them again at the Conference Championship Game for old times sake.

by TowerPower on Aug 24, 2010 10:25 AM CDT reply actions  

Facing the trade-offs

Sure, a title run in 2010 would be great, but how much are you willing to invest that could go to 2011? Would you break a critical redshirt? Would you stick with ‘proven’ senior talent at the cost of developing freshmen? Do you spend your practice time developing your system or preparing for key opponents?

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Aug 24, 2010 10:30 AM CDT reply actions  

As I have said before...

You do everything you possibly can to win right here right now.

Same stance I kept having to throw out there in regards to 2008.

If you think that breaking a redshirt gives you a shot at a title this year, by God you better freaking break the redshirt. You never know what will happen in the future, you must do everything you possibly can to win every game, everytime, any other stance imo is flawed.

by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 24, 2010 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I understand this stance entirely

and agree with it, but I’m thinking that sometimes it not that simple. If the decision of breaking a redshirt is in response to failure of the current active player, then yeah. But the line can become a little fuzzy when it’s a matter of preparation or gaining reps with the “just-in-case” mentality. And when you’re introducing a new offense to a new QB and a lot of young guys, the edges will be smoothed out with the intention perfecting this time next year. That doesn’t mean we’re not going for all the marbles this year.

This is also what makes MB & Co. such a great recruiting tank. They invest for years ahead to win every game, every time, which entails not doing certain things right here and now.

by Infield Elephant on Aug 24, 2010 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Jerry Jones probably agrees

Would you trade the Cowboys for the Patriots?

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Aug 24, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I cannot respond

As this question makes no sense to me.

by BoddickerIsClutch on Aug 24, 2010 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

What I meant

I see the Cowboys as the ultimate win-now team and the Pats as the prototype build-for-the-future team. I prefer the Cowboys because I enjoy the drama, but I think the Pats are better at team building.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Aug 25, 2010 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Having a hard time feeling it for 2011

In my view 2010 looks more likely for a title run.

We lose 3-4 starters on the OL. It may be that the younger players are more talented, but the OL is still going to be primarily manned by lower classmen, including some true freshmen. And it is not like all of the young guys are going to get a ton of PT in 2010, because of the 4 seniors. I agree with HJ’s take on Barking Carnival:

The only thing that makes me feel good about the tackle position this year is comparing it to next year. See? Don’t you feel better already?

How many dominant soph OL have we seen in the Mack Brown era? Blalock and….?

Same issue at CB. Akina does a great job of molding NFL caliber corners, but the learning curve under him has generally been about 2-3 years. Aaron Williams and Aaron Ross are the only ones that have really gotten it in their second years – and Ross was 4 years removed from highschool when he was a true soph at Texas. (Sidenote: maybe we should recruit more DB’s named Aaron?). And again, PT for young guys will be limited by the Browns and Williams.

DL will be primarily underclassmen and true freshmen, though I’m less concerned here if Randall stays and because of the DE recruiting and coaching, but that is still projecting greatness for a ton of unproven guys.

We also lose Justin Tucker and John Gold.

Should see net positives for 2011 over 2010 at QB/WR/TE/S/LB (if both return). RB and the running game in general are true wildcards.

by Horncasting on Aug 24, 2010 10:50 AM CDT reply actions  

We lose Tucker and Gold,

but didn’t we get some stud out of Arkansas?

by ElMariachiLoco on Aug 24, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Will Russ

May be great. Completely unproven right now.

by Horncasting on Aug 24, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Good thoughts

OL: We “lose” some dependability, but it was a lot like “losing” Tanner and Hall—dependable, but not NFL-caliber. Next year, we’re hoping for some development from, chiefly, Mason Walters, but also his compatriots like Paden Kelley and Thomas Ashcraft. David Snow is solid at C. Trey Hopkins sounds ready to take over a spot now. Plus, we add Westerman and Greenlea. I expect one or both to play, with an outside shot of significant reps. Yeah, it’s not an ideal line of all developed juniors and seniors, but it’s one with significant potential.

CB will be interesting. It will be interesting to see how much Muschamp plays Byndom and White. I agree there will be a ramp-up there; that’s the weak spot going into ’11.

Even losing Jones and Acho, DE should be the strongest position going into next year. A lot of the DT’s will have significant reps this year; even if Randall leaves, they’ll have had more game experience inside than Randall, Houston or Alexander had last year. Or Acho, Howell, etc have this year. So I think we’re actually starting out ahead here going into ’11. Especially if Randall stays.

Justin Tucker is a junior and should be returning. Outside shot that Russ punts this year, so we’ll see what he’s about.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 24, 2010 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hoping for development

I agree with pretty much everything you said, but it comes down to making predictions now about how players will pan out when most of them at OL, DL, CB and to some extent WR have never played a down of college football. I just don’t see how anyone can be so bullish on them at this point to think a title run next year is likely.

You are right about Tucker.

by Horncasting on Aug 24, 2010 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

This seems like a pretty healthy perspective.

Nice take on it.

I have found myself repeatedly wavering in my confidence for the 2010 season. Some days, I’m feeling Glendale, others maybe 2 or 3 losses. I don’t really think it matters one way or another coming into the season because 1) my level of confidence most likely plays zero factor in the performance of the Longhorns, and 2) I like the suspense in the unknown, in a sick, semi-masochist kind of way. But this is a healthy way of looking at it. All realms of success are possible this year, but the most important aspect being the preparation for 2011. Good thing about that, is Mack’s general philosophy of winning a National Championship being the goal every year.

by Infield Elephant on Aug 24, 2010 11:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Regarding the Fozzy Fantasy...

what do you make of Mack’s recent comments about protecting Fozzy from too many reps in practice? Is he sincerely trying to keep someone he regards as crucial to his success injury free? Or is he just trying to keep the kid engaged while tacitly acknowledging that he’s not “the guy”?

by llogg on Aug 24, 2010 12:50 PM CDT reply actions  

I think one thing that isn't talked about enough is how the veterans on the team feel about losing that NCG w/out Colt

I think there’s a lot of resentment/anger/determination on the team, that was exercised in the weight room over the summer.

The guys who were at that game are coming into this season hungry, and I think the expectation, from themselves, is to make it back to the NCG this year and to win it.

by notsofst on Aug 24, 2010 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Coach Boom

Does anyone know the story behind Muschamp getting the nickname “Boom?” Does it have anything to do with the fail on the chest bump with Orakpo? Haha…classic.

by Scott Crosby on Aug 28, 2010 12:54 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8