Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

Oklahoma Preview: Offense and Place Kicking

With the season just around the corner, it's time to take a brief look at our favorite northern neighbors.  The Land Thieves went into the 2009 season with pretty large expectations, but a questionable offensive line and some unfortunate injuries derailed whatever potential they had and they suffered five losses.  It may be worth noting that they were all close losses save their thumping in Lubbock, but nonetheless, five-loss seasons are hard to swallow for a top program, injuries or not.

35659_aptopix_oklahoma_texas_bradford_hurt_football_medium

Texas fans can actually sympathize with this...

This season, expectations are once again high, with Oklahoma almost universally appearing in the Top 3 of preseason polls and going as high as #1.  Despite the loss of some big named players and their struggles last year, pundits are high on Oklahoma's talent and ability to replace important pieces.

Today, I'll take a quick look at their offensive units and what we can expect out of them.  Tomorrow, I'll tackle their defense.

Star-divide

Quarterback

The starter is obviously Landry Jones, who put in a respectable 2009 season despite being thrown into the fire after Bradford's injury.  When I've seen him, Jones has displayed a good arm and decent accuracy, but he can get jittery in the pocket, not uncommon for a young QB, and in tough situations his overall play can take a significant dip.  He is a bit more mobile than Sam Bradford, but Colt McCoy he is not.  If you look at his statistical splits, he struggled mightily on third and long, where QB's arguably earn their money (so to speak), and he was not very good in tight ball games.  To no one's surprise, he had a rough time against the two best defenses he faced all year, Texas and Nebraska, throwing a combined seven interceptions, and his road games were not nearly as strong as his home performances.  That being said, Jones performed fairly well considering the circumstances, and while I am a homer and prefer Gilbert over him, there's no question Jones at least has some solid production backing him up.  Jones will not be Sam Bradford, but he has the tools to be a good quarterback provided the rest of the offense improves around him. 

He apparently plans to regrow his famous mustache from last year, saying that "Sooner nation needs the stache."  By all means, grow it back.  I'd love to see Sam Acho rip it off of you.

Behind him are Drew Allen and Blake Bell.  Both are young players and have athletic talent, with Blake Bell in particular being quarterback eye candy.  Still, OU is in the same boat as Texas:  If their young starter goes down, their season is in jeopardy.

Wide Receiver

In defense of Landry Jones' struggles, Oklahoma had a pretty inconsistent wide receiver corps. outside of Ryan Broyles (that sounds familiar too...).  Broyles is a legit playmaker and is by far the most proven receiver on the team, hauling in over double the amount of receptions and yards than the next leading receiver (which was RB Demarco Murray) and grabbing 15 touchdown passes.  Another notable is the freshman Kenny Stills, who has drawn positive reviews in camp and looks to be a reliable option.  They will need him to play well, because besides Broyles, it's hard to see where consistent production will come from.  DeJuan Miller looks the part of a big time wide receiver, but similar to our own Malcolm Williams, he can be hit or miss.  Brandon Caleb returns from last season but never impressed me much when I saw him play, and that goes for the senior Cameron Kenney as well.  This could be problematic for OU if they face a team that is capable of covering Broyles (like... Texas), but this may not be an issue against the rest of their Big 12 schedule.

Runningback

Demarco Murray may be injury prone, but unlike Fozzy, the guy has played enough to put up solid numbers.  He is deadly on screen plays, as we have found out, and he has the quickness and speed to break big runs.  Oklahoma's run game has hit a brick wall against Texas the last couple of years, but such a game might very well come down to one big play that is broken by a guy like Murray.  He is not the consistent runner that Chris Brown was, but he can do significant damage on the edge and out of the backfield as a receiver.  He will be one of Landry Jones' biggest assets.

Their backups aren't bad, either.  From what I can tell, Mossis Madu is back as a runningback and he is the second option, while Jermie Calhoun showed some brief flashes last year.  From camp, Jonathon Miller has drawn positive reviews, but the talented Roy Finch, as PB reported, is out 6-8 weeks with an injury.  Not a huge blow as long as Murray stays healthy, but it limits their options a little.

This a solid group overall, but I think there is an appreciable dropoff after Murray.

Tight End

What I recall from last year is Jermaine Gresham missing the season and Brody Eldridge being moved to center, where he was the greatest center in OU history, and then moving back to tight end, where he was the greatest blocking tight end in OU history.  Or something along those lines.  In any case, they have returning experience but it is not elite.  Trent Ratteree and James Hanna saw significant field time last season, but I see both as more blocking tight ends than great receiving threats (Ratteree deserves credit for a nice Sun Bowl, though).  These guys are your projected starters for the season, but from what I hear from camp, guys like top recruit Austin Haywood and Trey Millard are showing greater potential as receiving threats.  No one here is on Gresham's level yet, but it's a bit more pinned down than Texas' situation.

Offensive Line

Oklahoma had some bad luck with injuries last year, but some of that bad luck was created by poor offensive line play.  While the line got better as the season progressed, it was a very disappointing season even for first rounder Trent Williams.  This year, it looks to be a lot better for Oklahoma.  Here's the starting five from left to right:

Donald Stephenson
Stephen Good
Ben Habern
Tyler Evans
Eric Mensik

Donald Stephenson missed last year due to academics, and his return should bolster the OU line.  While they lose Trent Williams, OU fans are high on Stephenson.  I don't have personal experience watching him play a whole lot since he only had spot duty in 2008 and missed all of 2009, but he was projected to start last year and is expected to be a solid left tackle. 

Stephen Good did play last year and has good strength, but the guy had his struggles in the interior against quick defensive tackles.  Habern is a good center and Evans is a talented young guard, so the interior line should be decent.  Senior Eric Mensik is a converted tight end and may lack a little size, so he is a project worth keeping an eye on.

The problem with this line is that it's thin.  They have a decent backup center in Brian Lepak, but former LSU Tiger Jarvis Jones is the backup for, well, everyone else, it seems.  Jones is versatile enough to play both guard and tackle, as he did last year with varying degrees of success, but besides him the backups consist of a bunch of freshman or redshirt freshman.  One injury would be problematic; two could be devastating.  The Land Thieves may think they deserve a break from bad injuries, but we've thought for several years we're due a break at tight end and that didn't happen.

Provided Texas does not suffer significant DL injuries, I still like our D-line matched up against this unit. 

Place Kicking

I'll cover the rest of special teams with the defense tomorrow, but I'll lump place kicking with the offense.  Simply put, OU is not in a good situation here.  The projected starter is Patrick O'hara and the backup is Jimmy Stevens, neither of whom has shown a strong, consistent leg.  This will put more pressure on the offense to score points, as Oklahoma cannot afford to get into a defensive slugfest that is settled by field goals.  Maybe they can take a tip from Mike Leach and ask random students to walk on.

Conclusion

This will most certainly not be the 2008 Oklahoma Sooners, but if their defense is as good as advertised, they won't have to be.  A lot will ride on the performance of the offensive line, which was the goat last year.  If they can keep Landry Jones upright and provide running space for Murray, this offense should put up a respectable amount of points against most opponents.  Also, it will be helpful if another receiver or two steps up to help Ryan Broyles.  Otherwise, teams with a strong secondary like Texas or Nebraska (in a possible CCG matchup) can severely limit what Oklahoma can do.  Jones will obviously have to play well for OU to seek the shiny crystal ball, but I feel that if he is asked to gunsling his way to victory, Oklahoma simply will not get there.

Matched up against our defense, I feel fairly confident that we can handle most of what Oklahoma would want to do.  Murray scares me the most, but overall I think we have the tools to counter Oklahoma's strengths.  All evaluations, of course, are subject to change once we actually see some football.

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Fantake has had their say as well

Nickel’s Texas take vs. Nate’s OU take

I’d love to have their complement of running backs. Even if Murray is injured, Calhoun is extremely talented even with fumbleitis. OU fans were also expecting big things from Finch, so we’ll see if he plays this year or not.

They’re also raving about Kenny Stills; I can’t believe the Pac-10 whiffed so badly on him and Tony Jefferson.

Just like Texas, OU is asking for a lot of development from QB & WR. And hoping their line stays intact.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Aug 31, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

I've taken a look at both of those

I’m not as high on OU’s offensive line as those guys seem to be, as I think the unit still has a lot to prove. I agree that their RB group is superior to ours, but nobody at this moment scares me that much other than Murray.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 31, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

There was an article on NewsOK about the o-line. Wilson plans to sub a lot so the line stays fresh. They seem to think they have lots of talent on the depth chart.

Just like last year?

by dimecoverage on Aug 31, 2010 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

We've all learned to take the Oklahoma sunshine pumping with a bucket of salt

I’ll believe it when I see it. Talent? Sure. Productive talent? We’ll see.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 31, 2010 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

After last season, the media has to realize that they’re just being spoon fed whatever Stoops feels like spitting out.

I get the OU general media optimism a little bit now… No one is really claiming that they’re out and out better than the other top contenders, just that they have some decent upside and this could be a year where a one or two loss team makes the title game.

That being said, I can’t help but like our matchups on both sides of the ball. OU is one of the few teams that can be a Chykie meltdown away from victory though, so I wouldn’t go so as to peg us an any more than a very mild favorite in the CB.

by Tackchevy on Aug 31, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Broyles, Murray, and the UT OL are the differences

When healthy, Broyles and Murray are extremely productive players, while UT lacks any productive receivers or backs. UT has the superior line. Each team has a QB who can be very productive. I think the offenses are relatively even, to be honest.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Aug 31, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

UT has the superior line?

With 3 new starters? That’s a pretty bold statement. Until you see them play I don’t know if that’s something you can count on.

by What_the on Aug 31, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

As long as we quit asking refrigerators to tap dance, we should be good at O-Line.

by Tackchevy on Aug 31, 2010 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good sure...

Never said they wouldn’t be. However, superior to OU before even seeing them play is a bit of a stretch.

by What_the on Aug 31, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

We haven't seen

OU’s line play yet either, so saying they’re NOT better is also a stretch. At least our line didn’t lose a first round left tackle. The three departed seniors not only weren’t first round material, they weren’t ANY round material, which leads me to think that we’ll recover from their absence better than a team that lost what was, according to the NFL draft, the best tackle in the country.

by sessamoid on Aug 31, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most would probably say

Russell Okung was the best tackle, but Trent wasn’t far behind and had a lot of ceiling left in his developement.

by KratosWasASooner on Aug 31, 2010 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Compared to what was an absolutely terrible OU line in 2009...

…and one that lost its only member who was really any good, yes. I’m sure the experience will make some of them a little better, but even the Texas line’s average play was far better than OU’s in 2009.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Aug 31, 2010 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jermie Calhoun is not

extremely talented. He is a bust. Maybe good on special teams but nothing else. Mack was wise to pass on him

by BEW on Aug 31, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

“Maybe they can take a tip from Mike Leach and ask random students to walk on.”

Stoops tried that this week. Lots of people showed up, no winners. Too bad.

by dimecoverage on Aug 31, 2010 11:40 AM CDT reply actions  

the day is here

there was a time when a m.stoops ou defense owned our offense. he is gone, we now have Muschamp, and the worm has turned. intimidate ou. that is now our attitude. i don’t know how many points our offense can score, but our defense will put the fear in them.

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Aug 31, 2010 1:01 PM CDT reply actions  

To Me This Is The Most Intriguing UT OU Matchup Ever

Maybe a slight overstatement, but the way the squads match up with their relative strengths and weaknesses this game just seems like a tossup. OU has more top line talent, and the Horns bringing greater depth of afletes. Seems like the game will hinge on turnovers, game plan, and special teams.

Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"

by realmccoy on Aug 31, 2010 1:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Agreed

This one is looking extremely difficult to predict and I think we have to watch a few football games first from each squad to get a better idea.

I also don’t care much for the comparisons between each team’s QB, each team’s RBs, etc… a better analysis focuses on things like OU’s WRs vs. UT’s CBs, OU’s OL vs. UT’s DL, etc…

I think they did an analysis like that on Barking or Recruitocosm and it is a much more effective way to look at the matchup

by TxHorns989 on Aug 31, 2010 2:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Way to go out on a limb
All evaluations, of course, are subject to change once we actually see some football.

by Eskimohorn on Aug 31, 2010 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Haha, goes without saying, of course

One thing that I wanted to get at, though, is that much of Oklahoma’s optimism, like a bunch of other teams, is based on unproven potential. I find it puzzling that, for example, many people assume that the O-line will be an asset when it is practically rebuilt again. Their fans have every right to be optimistic because a team like OU will always have talented players, but somehow their optimism is reasonable while optimism for Texas seems far-fetched. Not sure why.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 31, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am not sold on the OU OL, or their QB. Murray cannot stay healthy for an entire year, and I think Calhoun is just not that good. I like Utah St +34 in the opener b/c I do not think OU is going to score 40 points.

by miketag on Aug 31, 2010 1:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Jones isn't Sam Bradford

But he doesn’t have to be. He’s definitely more of a gunslinger, but that guy can still throw for 25-30 touchdowns pretty easily.

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

by burntorangehorn on Aug 31, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty good evaluation and objective as well

Both teams have concerns with the o-line depth and need to create some running lanes for their team to be successful in all aspects. I would give a slight edge to OU because of a QB with a year under his belt, being deeper in the RB position (quality and numbers) and a proven go to receiver. I not saying OU is dominant as far as offense, just that these advantages add up to an edge. Both defenses are quality and will hit you. Ought to be a great game this year!

by soonerspeak on Aug 31, 2010 1:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Gross

Why do I have to look at a big ass picture of this dude when I log on to read about Texas Longhorn sports??

by Dirty Work on Aug 31, 2010 2:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Get used to it. We will see a lot of that mug the next few years. And probably not in a good way.

by dimecoverage on Aug 31, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's gone!!

Guess I’m not the only one who felt that way… :)

by Dirty Work on Aug 31, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

You can never tell with OU........

I never expected to see the Sooners win a Big 12 title with Nate Hybl nor Paul Thompson, but it happened……I expected us to smoke Kansas State in 2003 but we ended up getting smoked……Sure we lost 5 games last year…. on the road to Miami by 1, on the road at Nebraska by 7, we shot ourselves in the foot against BYU and lost by 1, I’m not going to mention Tech because that was just a flat out ace woopin, and hung with and almost beat the national championship runner up horns. With OU, the skies the limit in college football. Not to mention, we now have a team who is experienced. And of course, whether people like to admit it or not, we have an outstfreakinstanding coaching staff. If anything, I’m excited to see how Martinez does with our DB’s and Wright with our D line. This excites me. So does having Josh Heupel as QB coach. Heupel will have Landry ready. I, like every other Sooner, wish a great season for Murray…….. BOOMER!

by EnragedOUfan on Aug 31, 2010 4:01 PM CDT reply actions  

I don't know about outstanding coaching staff

Perhaps 6-7 years ago, but I think the times are a little different now. Even for the coaches that were there before. OU seems to be moving in the wrong direction with their staff, while UT is basically loaded at every position except OL and OC (though I believe Davis is a very good QB coach).

by GoHornsGo90 on Aug 31, 2010 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kevin Wilson is much better than he gets credit for, at least according to last year. The Land Thieves had some very tough breaks. Things could have very different.

But then, if Wilson and Stoops hadn’t blown smoke about that incredible o-line, I doubt the commentary would have been as harsh. They brought it on themselves. Not that Stoops, etc., should have gone out and trashed the line to the media, but they should not have made it sound like last year’s group was the second coming.

by dimecoverage on Aug 31, 2010 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

While I Hate OU

I would say they have a top notch coaching staff. Their Big XII titles and the fact they are a top 5 program is proof enough. What happened to OU is that the Horns upgraded their coaching staff considerably, and used that fact to damage OU recruiting in Texas. OU offers very few advantages to Texas. Chitty University, chitty town, no atmosphere – so it is basically tradition + coaching that keeps them where they are.

Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"

by realmccoy on Sep 1, 2010 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

One little squabble

Oklahoma as a consensus #3 is a little off. Almost every poll I’ve seen has them in the 6-10 range, Phil Steele being the only #1.

by KratosWasASooner on Aug 31, 2010 5:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks, ES

(good initials, BTW) . . . I’m curious about OU’s depth . . . because they’ll be challenged early (Florida State, Air Force, at Cincinnati) in the weeks leading to Oct. 2.

Their ’09 season was flat bizarre. Injuries to the QB and TE and several OL hit them in places where they had no backups.

Despite that, they basically gave away the BYU and Miami games, and some would argue the same with the RRS (remember those 2Q special teams turnovers). They beat Nebraska something like 25-10 in first downs and managed to lose 10-3. And they killed a decent OSU bunch and devoured Stanford (granted, the starting QB missed the game).

by edsp on Aug 31, 2010 5:27 PM CDT reply actions  

When the matchup is this close, it's hard for me not to believe that the kicking game won't be the decider

OU having such a problem at kicker while we’ve got Tucker and Russ both competing for the top spot gives me some real confidence.

I’d take Gilbert over Jones in a heartbeat, but it’s a wash on paper. If either of them prove turnover prone, it’ll cost their team the game. Murray may break a big play that could be a game changer, if he can find a 1×1 with Gideon. If he ends up 1×1 with Scott first though, he might leave the game.

I also believe we’ve got the edge on defense, but I guess there’s another thread coming for that.

by notsofst on Aug 31, 2010 5:39 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Early Predictions for Fall Depth Chart (Offense)
Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
To Shirt or Not to Shirt? (Defense)
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
To Shirt or Not to Shirt? (Offense)
Vince_young_small
longhorn network
Small
Quick ? About the JUCO Guys...?
Small
If you were the head coach how would you recruit?
Small
Dear Santa, (re: DGB)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8