Texas Football 2010: Five Most Important Offensive Players
One month to kickoff, and though we'll of course set aside a day to talk about "My Guys" -- those players we're betting on to break out and have big seasons -- let's first spend a few minutes talking about things as we know them. Below, my take on the five most important players to this year's offense, which is as difficult a unit to project as any since this site launched over five years ago. I'm guessing we'll all agree on the top spot, but I'm curious to hear your thoughts on who you see as critical beyond QB1.
(1) QB Garrett Gilbert - No need to get cute: Gilbert's the most important offensive player on the team. I'm not telling you anything you don't already know. The rest of the offense could be butter and if Gilbert's a mess, the offense will be hamstrung. We don't have a Ricky Williams around which to build an offensive attack, and even if the running game is something fun to watch -- needless to say, a big if -- this offense is going to struggle to punch in sixes if Gilbert's not at least respectable. Obviously, the hopes are much higher, but there's no need to sugarcoat the situation. Gilbert needs to be solid, at a minimum, and no player is more important to the offense as a whole, given everything we know.
(2) G Tray Allen - Okay, now you can get cute. Or at least I'm going to, by suggesting that Tray Allen may be as important as anyone on the offensive roster. Part hunch, part observation, and part bias based on my growing up a Steelers fan watching Alan Faneca, but given what our staff seems committed to trying to accomplish on offense this year, this offense could use a healthy, productive, well-used Tray Allen at left guard as much as anything else we might prescribe. Allen has the size and strength to be effective straightaway, but he also flashed some eyebrow-raising athleticism last year, in ways that suggest he can be pulled and deployed much like the Steelers used to do with the All-Pro Faneca.
Allen missed the latter part of spring workouts with an ankle injury, but appears on track for fall camp, and the big question right now along with his health is whether the coaches intend to deploy him at left or right guard. In theory, it doesn't matter too much, but I'd prefer to see the stronger, less agile Huey on the right, with Allen on the left, where his athleticism is likely better to be put to good use. Yes, you can easily argue I'm overselling his importance, but to the extent that one envisions our staff's strategy of offensive attack as I do, a good argument can be made for Allen as a critical component to this offense executing a running game off of which a passing game can be built.
(3) WR Marquise Goodwin - John Chiles is getting all the rave summer reviews, and don't kid yourself: I'll take it. But I'm from Missouri on Chiles as a go-to receiver, and think at this point any superlatives he earns are house money. Even if your pants are tingling about what you've read about Chiles this summer, let me remind you just how wide is the gap he must close by pointing you back to last year's Red River Shootout, and the substitution of Goodwin for Chiles. Without the true freshman's ability to separate, Texas loses that game.
Or to think about it another way: if Chiles and Malcolm Williams are badasses this fall, Texas is all but assured to field a superior offense -- plenty good enough to outscore the minuscule allowances of this Texas defense. But if we're planning for worst case scenarios, that probably includes assuming Chiles is similarly limited to last year and Williams fails to put it all together. And in that case, we really need to be looking for a realistic option to give Texas' passing offense a consistent threat. For my money, Goodwin is the player to watch.
During Gilbert's mop-up duties during last year's regular season, he seemed to have developed a nice rapport with Goodwin and understood his ability and potential. Whether that means anything heading into this year, who knows. But we barely got by with Shipley-but-no-Cosby last year, and we won't have either of those receivers this fall. Someone needs to step up, and my focus will be on #84. He's an elite athlete, obviously, but he's not masquerading as a football player. The kid's a genuine gamer. We've just scratched the surface of what he's capable of.
(4) OL Thomas Ashcraft & Mason Walters - As of today, Texas appears set on starting, left to right: Kyle Hix, Michael Huey, David Snow, Tray Allen, and Britt Mitchell. I've already spoken to my preference for switching Huey and Allen, but either way, it's highly likely -- tempting to say certain -- that those five won't tell the whole story this fall. At a minimum, it's likely that at least one of them will get injured for at least a short while. Moreover, it's hardly a stretch to wonder whether at least one of them will prove less than acceptable from a performance standpoint. Frame it however you want: Texas is going to call on other offensive linemen to deliver important minutes this fall.
Well, what are our options?
| NAME | HT | WT | EXP |
| Thomas Ashcraft | 6-5 | 315 | RS-Fr |
| Dominic Espinosa | 6-4 | 295 | FR |
| Trey Hopkins | 6-4 | 297 | FR |
| Paden Kelley | 6-7 | 285 | RS-Fr |
| Steve Moore | 6-4 | 290 | SR |
| Luke Poehlmann | 6-7 | 275 | SO |
| Garrett Porter | 6-6 | 305 | RS-Fr |
| Mason Walters | 6-6 | 300 | RS-Fr |
Steve Moore is an acceptable gap-filler upperclassman who won't embarrass himself against terrible competition but is -- at best -- an unknown against top flight opponents, and a likely liability. He'll do in a pinch, but if it's quality we're searching for, as opposed to a warm body, Moore ain't it. (As most of you probably do as well, I subscribe to the philosophy that a player who isn't in the rotation by his junior year is highly unlikely to show something special as a senior. Yes, this perhaps makes a Tray Allen breakout year wishful thinking.) Freshmen Espinosa and Hopkins are nice to have around for an emergency, but let's not confuse that for depth you want to be counting upon. Third-year sophomore Luke Poehlmann sports a dew I fully respect, but the dude still can't put on any weight; he's a fourth-quarter guy -- as a player when we're winning, and a cheerleader when the contest is tight.
Really, it comes down to Porter, Ashcraft, and Walters, and my sense is that Porter has potential to be a contributor at tackle next year and beyond, but if we're talking about real quality, in real minutes, this year, the focus is on Walters and Ashcraft. Mason Walters is the name you know, and if he's healthy (he missed this spring injured once again) I'll be glad to see what he's able to give us out there, and I like his versatility. It could prove a very valuable asset, given the overall picture along the line.
But the guy I'm most intrigued by is Thomas Ashcraft, and I'll be watching him closely in the second halves against Rice and Wyoming. I love how he's developing, and though I want to see how he moves his feet against live competition, I think he may be ready now. Keep an eye on these two; assuming they're healthy, one or both is likely to play an important role on this year's line.
(5) RB Tre' Newton - When I get to my annual "My Guys" column later in August, I'll tell you why I'm (still) excited about Fozzy Whittaker (dooming him to fail, of course), but while we're dabbling in realism I'm not so blinded as to overlook the importance of Tre' Newton, who even in the envisioned Fozzy administration would be a critical third down back. In reality, in terms of what's been proven on the field, he's the most dependable and versatile back that we have and whether his role is complementary or featured, he will have an important role to play as long as he's healthy, making him the easy choice on this Most Important list.
The truth of the matter, of course, is that we really don't have any idea what to expect of this Texas offense this year, and while I won't call anyone crazy for envisioning something explosive, if they're not equally open to the possibility that things will be ugly, they're just cheerleading. As with Goodwin, this list is about identifying the guys that the Texas offense will need if things are an uphill battle, and Newton was the best tailback at making chicken fried steak out of lemons in 2009. If yards are difficult to come by against quality defenses this fall, Newton's a proven commodity in terms of making the most out of a bad situation, whether that's grasping for yards, staying in to pass block, or swinging out into the flat as a receiver. And if things are going well, he's a smart, consistent, technically sound player a la Chris Ogbonnaya who we'll be counting on in third down situations.
And I'll leave it at that for now, opening the floor to y'all. Who are you eyeballing as the most important pieces to the offensive puzzle this fall? Save your "he's not necessarily most important but I lurve him" rankings for the annual "My Guys" column. Feel free to get cute and make the case for someone unexpected, but today we're really taking a cold and calculated look at who we think the offense most needs to succeed.
Your thoughts?
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My top five!
1- Garret Gilbert
2- Kyle Hix
3- Tre’ Newton
The top three (QB, LT, and RB) is obvious IMO.
4- DJ Grant. I really have high hopes for him. I’m hoping he’ll get the start before the OU game and flex it out!
5- Mike Davis. I’m torn between Marquise Goodwin and Mike Davis here. Both top notch receivers. For the purpose of being cute, I give the node to Mike Davis!
In Mack Brown We Trust!
Don't forget Paden Kelly
I did not see any mention of Paden Kelly. I will put my money on Paden. He is listed as the back up left tackle in Dave Campbell’s . Has anyone seen or heard how he is doing?
Top five
As mentioned above, my top three are:
1. GG
2. Kyle Hix
3. Tre Newton
Obviously, we will only go as far as GG can take us. Kyle HIx gets #2 since he has to protect the blind side. If our running game is going to do anything, you have to look to Newton to carry the load.
After that….
4. Receivers not named Goodwin—everyone seems set, and I agree, that #84 should be “the guy” this year. For my money, I want to know who is going to step up opposite of Marquise. I (maybe foolishly) have high hopes for Malcolm Williams. However, two guys that I really want to see this fall are Mike Davis and DeSean Hales. If one of those two can step into the slot and run some Shipley-esque routes, it’ll be a major boost to the offense. I know that Chiles seems like the logical choice here for the #3, but I really wasn’t impressed with what I saw from him on the field last season. At any rate, someone outside of Goodwin is going to have to step up.
5. Barrett Matthews—I know that conventional wisdom would suggest putting someone else from the O-line in this spot, but given our absolute non-production from the TE position over the last few years, I’d love it if Matthews can put together a solid season. Think about it, the last really dependable TE we had was David Thomas. Jermichael Finley was growing into a stud, but left after his RS sophomore year. Blaine Irby suffered that terrible injury in the second or third game the next year. Let’s not talk about the EBS from last year. I know that a lot of people are excited about D.J. Grant in the flex TE spot, but if we’re committed to a running game, we need a TE who can block as well as catch the ball. Much like the second receiver behind Goodwin, GG (for all his talent) is going to need every option available to him in his first year starting. Having a dependable TE who is a reliable safety valve really brings your offense up to another level. If you don’t believe me, go watch tape from the NCG against USC. David Thomas was an absolute beast in that game. VY heroics aside, we don’t win that game without Thomas.
I'm with you on Matthews as well.
EBS’s spot provides the greatest opportunity for an upgrade to the offense.
I hate to say it this way, but
I think we might as well just go with most important offensive units.
1) Gilbert (cuz there’s no doubt he will be in there). We go as far as Gilbert is able to go.
2) O-line, because well, I just don’t know who’s going to be in there for the long term. I imagine there won’t be a lot of job security for most of our O-line at least in the early part of the season.
3) RB stable. Newton should be the guy, but teams will be game planning for him. It will be interesting to see how he handles the extra attention. There is also about 18 guys waiting for their chance to be “the guy”.
4) Receivers. Similar to O-line. If our “vets” aren’t performing, there is some insane amounts of talent waiting in the wings. Hope fully we won’t HAVE to use our youngins, more like we GET to use our youngins.
5) Return specialists. J-Ship will be missed. It’ll partially be up to these guys to soften the blow of losing him. Who will be back there besides AJ Williams? Marquise? Desean?
Technically not offense
But I am curious to see how Tucker does as our FG kicker. Lawrence and Bailey were very good UT kickers and helped us win many games during their time. It was too bad they were the same year.
by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 4, 2010 8:23 AM CDT reply actions
Safeties
Who will fill in for Earl Thomas is going to be critical for the defense.
The OL is key for the offense.
As far as Tray Allen. Has any player ever not started his first three years and became all conference on the OL? The Faneca comparison had me wondering where the hell has he been the past three years.
Coaching
Will the coaches replace the older WR and OL with the younger guys if they can’t get it going? Will G. Davis stick to the running too long if its not working (MNC).
the O-LINE
1)Kyle Hix
2)Michael Huey
3)David Snow
4)Trey Allen
5)Britt Mitchell
If the O-line “Hugs a fat one” this year, we are done! GG can be a stud but this is a very important time in his developement. If our O-line is Crap he will fail miserably and that could ruin his confidence and ruin our chances of returning to the MNC anytime soon.
by Hookemlc on Aug 4, 2010 8:28 AM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Well put
If he’s scrambling for his life as colt had to do I think we may be in for a tough year for the O.
Yee-haw!!!
by UT2001 on Aug 4, 2010 8:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
If
the O-line “Gels” and we get some good TE play, the running game will come and GG will have a season comparable to Bradford’s soph year at ou.
That's the year Bradford won the Heisman
It was Bradford’s second full season of starting, his initial line consisted of five seasoned seniors (one eventually replaced by competent junior Trent Williams, of course), Brown and Murray each 1000-yd. seasons, Gresham had a monster season, and receivers Iglesias, Johnson, and Broyles had terrific seasons. Everything fell perfectly into place, other than 45-35. Bradford had over 4700yds. passing and 55 total touchdowns. You think a little synergy on the OL and some good TE play will result in Gilbert’s having a season that is comparable to that?
Look, I despite the Dirt Thieves as much as the next guy, but I really don’t think that’s even close to realistic.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 4, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions
I think behind OU's line, and with those receivers, GG could rack up close to those numbers
But it’s not realistic because of our line and receivers, not GG.
He’ll be lucky to get 75% of that. And 75% of the time in the pocket that Bradford had.
Behind that line, with those receivers, AND in at least his third year in the system
That’s just my humble opinion, of course.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 4, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Bradford was successful because of his O-line, and the play of his TE. Brown and Murray flourished because of it, 2008 was the only season either one had anything close to a 1000 yards rushing. It all revolves around the O-line and TE’s, if the O-line Gel’s and we have a TE step up, GG and the running game will be on easy street.
Brown and Murray flourished because of it, 2008 was the only season either one had anything close to a 1000 yards rushing.
Part of that was Adrian Peterson and injuries. Actually, a large part of that was injuries, specifically to Murray. But let’s not pretend that their success was due to one magical year of OL play; Adrian Peterson, Quentin Griffin, and others had amazing success in that RB-friendly system.
It all revolves around the O-line and TE’s, if the O-line Gel’s and we have a TE step up, GG and the running game will be on easy street.
That’s unfortunate, because OL and TE are probably UT’s weakest positions.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Aug 5, 2010 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions
O-line
will have a better chance to do well if the scheme really did change.
I was about to chime in with this exact post.
If every member on the offense didn’t improve from last year to this year, and I had to pick 5 people to make it happen, I would pick every damn member I could on the O-Line.
No doubt in my mind that GG, Newton, Chiles, Goodwin and god knows who else could succeed with good blocking and/or time in the pocket.
It's been a while since we've had a duel threat TE so.....
Don’t forget about Barrett Matthews. This time next year, Desean Hales will be a key ingredient going forward.
Fun stuff
Ill chest and my number one is the O Line as a unit. If they don’t gel and barring a VY return, GG and the RB could be in for a rough time.
2) Gilbert
3) a RB threat probably Newton
4) Matthews. Need a flex threat to pull a LB or safety out if the box and to give our young QB an outlet pass when kirkendoll et al fail to achieve separation.
5) Malcolm. Can he finally put it together? If so, I believe he and Marquis on the field our running game has a chance.
Honeranle mention: Greg Davis. Mix it up and keep everyone off balanced buddy.
Yee-haw!!!
by UT2001 on Aug 4, 2010 8:33 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Sorry for typos. I'm on the iPhone and I'm over 30.
Yee-haw!!!
by UT2001 on Aug 4, 2010 8:35 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Waht dose that meen?
I an on iPhone an ovre 30?
Sent via iPhone
by billb on Aug 4, 2010 12:46 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree....
TE play will be very important to our success, and GG developement, Barrett would be # 6)
Agree for the most part
1. GG - People never mention that behind Matt Barkley, he was the #2 QB in his recruiting class, and he’s shown enough hutzpah in the national championship to say to me he’s ready to light it up. Even Ricky needed good blocking, and if these guys are going to gain confidence enough to become animals, they need some holes to squeeze through.
2. O Line
3. Marquise Goodwin- has many of the upsides of the Fozz, (hard worker, not a huge ego, talented kid) but has speed that really isn’t matched on this team- the kid just made academic all american for outdoor track—once he gets his football legs, god help anyone trying to catch him.
4. Malcolm Wiliams- Is an incredible athlete, and an upperclassman, and as such, can and should be a leader to the young offense.
5. DJ Monroe- had limited action last year, but has incredible speed, and moves that could make him a top returner in the country.
Picking nits here...
But Goodwin wears #8 now. If he can match last year’s number 8’s production he is my #’s 1-5 on this list.
Greatness lurks within Pookie. His size might keep him from being NFL playable, but his speed, hands, emerging route skills, and intangibles make him eligible to pick up the mantle, IMO. DWhite took 4, I’m perfectly happy with 8.
by Tackchevy on Aug 4, 2010 10:54 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
It's pretty easy.
1. Gilbert
2. Tre Newton
3. Malcolm Williams
4. David Snow
5. Barrett Matthews
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Good stuff PB
Your man crush from Chris O still lives vicariously through Tre, and I think he’s certainly the man for the job. My top 2-5 (come on, we all should have GG at the top)
2.) Give me Kyle Hix. The man has started a plethora of games at RT for the past few years. His health has been stable (not a Sneezy Jinx), and he has the raw power that we need to jump start the running game. I want to see how well he handles smaller but faster DE’s like we’re going to see early in the year. He got schooled 3 times in the game against Wyoming last year to a DE who was 6’5 240. I really expect him to jump up his game in pass protection this year, and he has the potential to be All Big 12.
3.) I’ll take Goodwin, based on his connection and trust he got with GG last year. I think that something that simple will pay huge dividends this year, especially as we start fall practice. By seasons end, Goodwin will have the most touches and the most yards by a WR wearing burnt orange.
4.) I’m going out on a limb here and I’m going to give the 4 spot to DeSean Hales. I may be overreacting and a little trigger happy with this gun, but I feel we may have found the next Ramonce Taylor, without the legal difficulties. The way I’ve seen this kid operate in space is astounding, and he was GG’s favorite target during the spring game which bodes well for his trust level with GG. I think we’ll see amazing things from him this year.
5.) Barrett Matthews. I’m afraid to state anything here about how excited I am about this TE, because everytime someone does, their knee explodes in a gruesome way. So instead, I want everyone to silently think about this kid, and be proud that we have him in burnt orange this year. Special.
Stumpy: It's called the '80s. Ford was president, Nixon was in the White House, and FDR was running this country into the ground. I was bummin' in a hole-in-the-wall town in what is now called "Utah".
My top 3 is same as yours
So to save space, here’s my 4 and 5:
4) Mason Walters. The most athletically gifted specimen on the line, and the lineman with the most upside. If he’s earning the majority of snaps by the end of the season, you’ve got the rock to anchor O-line for the Garrett Gilbert era. If he’s a healthy and valuable contributor early in the season and can get some experience going into the brutal middle of the schedule, look out.
5) Justin Tucker. Oh let us not forget the kicking game. He’s going to have to make some pressure kicks, some from 40+, because an offense with a green QB and no proven running game is going to bog down from time to time. Also because he is nails.
by windycityhorn on Aug 4, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Following suit
2)James Kirkendoll – Possible Quan/Ship security blanket for GG, he has to step up.
3)David Snow – He has to be better than he was last year if he is going to qb the offensive line, otherwise RIP running game and I formation.
4)EBS – Barrett Matthews needs to be a playmaker and not a blocking machine, if EBS can free Barrett up to do those things, win!
5)Sherrod Harris – I have a funny feeling we’re going to need him at times this year. But, for some reason, I trust he’ll be able to get it done.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Aug 4, 2010 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope you're wrong about #5
:-)
Stumpy: It's called the '80s. Ford was president, Nixon was in the White House, and FDR was running this country into the ground. I was bummin' in a hole-in-the-wall town in what is now called "Utah".
Good insight on Harris.
After ‘bama I’d bet they boost the number two person, whether Harris or someone else, with more reps in practice and more game time. It’s a smart investment, a safety play, especially for the long run. Getting #3 in the flow might even be wise.
Again, the gain for having relative back-up experience in a big game is probably much more than a loss in the end like the MNC. In that sense, Texas has really gambled for years – there was no mini-Vince behind VY and aside for Snead, not much behind Colt. You’re usually going to have a fall-off between #1 and #2, but you should have competence and some confidence at the least.
And like you, I think Harris could manage the offense on the short term, certainly the running offense if it transpires. We’re going to have some elevated risks with anyone we put in there.
Nice to read about actual football again
Thanks PB – juicy goodness.
by Infield Elephant on Aug 4, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions
Thanks for the list, PB. Thoughtful stuff.
I’ll take the other side of the Tray Allen question. I was a big fan of his until about the middle of 2008, when it became clear he was either (1) overrated coming out of high school, or (2) a bad fit, in some way, for UT. Now, I’d be happy if he didn’t get embarrassed by Tech, OU, Nebraska, etc.
To that end, I truly hope (and about halfway expect) that Walters or Ashcraft will take his job. Given the questions about depth at OT, I’d like to see Walters work there, but Walters or Ashcraft at guard, I don’t care. If Allen is 75 percent what you hope he might be, I’d guess this offense will be pretty stout.
My five: GG, Huey, Goodwin, Newton, Matthews. This offense was made for Michael Huey. I’m not sold on Matthews, or the TE or the H-back situation, but this is the athlete who can turn theory into reality. I think RB will continue to be muscial chairs; I don’t see “that” back, so I’d expect the carries to be spread among at least two backs and maybe four.
Reading Fail
Headline: Texas Football 2010: Five Most Important Offensive Players
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Aug 4, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
hahaah. Boom!
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Wha...?
No Whaley, No Hills?
You Ese! You Ese! You Ese!
by Ese-De-SA on Aug 4, 2010 12:25 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
+1, Very well played.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Aug 4, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
No Berryhill?
The humanity!
Stumpy: It's called the '80s. Ford was president, Nixon was in the White House, and FDR was running this country into the ground. I was bummin' in a hole-in-the-wall town in what is now called "Utah".
Great topic and great list, PB.
Seems like most everyone is responding with not the “most important” offensive players but, rather, “who I would like to see do well” based on last season & the spring game. However, your list seems to be the best. Your top 3 out of 5 most important players being offensive linemen really catches the pulse of all of us this year. OL performance & improvement will be huge.
However, I have a fundamental disagreement with pretty much everyone who has listed Marquis Goodwin. He didn’t even start last year. If he is being listed, that means that pretty much everyone is resigned to the fact that Kirkendoll & Williams will be disappointments in 2010. That’s why those 2 guys are the most important receivers, bar none, of anybody. They have the vast experience over all the others and, thus, will be the most important WRs of the whole talented group on the roster. If Marquis, Hales, etc… are on the field and starring, that means that the most important WRs have not met expectations.
I agree Rob with a caveat,
Both Hales and Goodwin could be slot guys while Kirk and Williams are outside guys.
That's true.
I agree that the slot guys are just as important. I just figured we wouldn’t be seein’ ‘em quite so much if we’re trying to run a bit more. Past GG & the OL, it’s hard to pin down anything else in particular that is the most important. It’s really just most important that everyone produce when a true soph QB is runnin’ the show.
With Malcom Williams ...
… I’m thinking this is his year to put it all together. Limas Sweed really wasn’t “all that” until he worked out the kinks from early on. Let’s hope Malcolm has worked on his hands, for GG’s benefit.
Good thoughts, Rob
Your argument about Kirkendoll and Williams is compelling. Maybe best to say that at least one among these guys needs to step up and have a big, wow season.
You ain't hurt...
You speak the truth.
Besides a brief brick-handed moment vs. Nebraska, I think Kirk’s always been a solid producer. But we all know that the ceiling is unlimited for Malcolm. Ala Sweed in his last year, MW needs to become the dominator that we all know he can be.
I'll play
1. GG — no question
2 and 3. Mason Walters and Thomas Ashcraft — Got to have at least seven bodies capable of “starting” to get through the season. The top 5 are pretty well set and these two guys need to prove they belong with that group.
4. Malcolm Williams — He needs to provide the deep threat and win jump balls on some fades to keep the defense honest and open up the underneath stuff for Goodwin and Kirkendoll.
5. Barrett Matthews (only if kicker is strictly Special Teams, if he’s offense, then Tucker) — He must be a reliable safety valve for Gilbert as well as bring value to the running game.
i'll get cute
beyond the obvious, David Snow is key.
If Texas is going to run and pass effectively, an intelligent, composed center who can physically do the job is a necessity.
I still can't believe Fred Akers went for the tie...
My thoughts
1. GG: It’s obvious. This is football and he is our QB.
2. Kyle Hix: LT. no more words are needed
3. Tre’ Newton: With an unexperienced QB we need to get some serious running game.
4. Howell: If he can make it, Acho will be able to spend full time at end, where I think he’ll have a monster year.
4t. Okafor. If Howell can’t make it. He’ll be the key in the Acho’s position.
5. Barrett Matthews: With the new ofense he is key.
My thinking
I’m in the o-line group.thats what’s going to make the season for us because we have superb role players but the big uglies is where it’s gonna be.I hope not to see GG running for his life consistently .
Felt good to read about the upcoming season,thanks PB
My response on OB (didn't know it was PB's thread)
GG is obvious.
- on the list should be: Barrett Matthews, he is more important to both the run game than most realize and to the passing game than Goodwin who I see as more of a “role player” than a feature WR or any other player listed (IMHO of course).
Williams at the WR is more important than Goodwin today.
Allen? Unless he’s improved/healthy/whatever, then either Ashcroft Walters or Porter step in so not sure why he’s there. Not sure there will be much difference this year between any of the three based on the last 3 years and I like the upside of Ashcroft and Porter. (you guys should check out Pat Culpepper’s comments on the subject)
4-???? Makes no sense. If Hix Huey Snow Allen and Mitchell are the starters, walters and Ashcraft are bench sitters. If Ashcroft or Walters plays, it means Allen and/or Mitchell isn’t cutting it.
Wouldn’t be the least suprised to see Tre be our #1 back/lead in carries with a 4.9 to 5.3 average per carry.
I wouldn’t put him in the top 5 most important, but D.J. Monroe might be the most intriguing offensive player for me. I can’t wait to see how Mack/Davis will use him.
"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda
The bullets
If we compiled a list of our top bullets, our blazers, our deep threats, our scoring threats no matter where we are on the field, DJ ought to be on that list. In a sense, it’s not if they start but when and where they play, like Ramonce and Pittman, with a little JC at the end, they’re force multipliers.
1. Goodwin
2, Monroe
3. M. Williams
4. Hales/Fozzy
5. Kirkendoll/Chiles
Speed and scoring ability are the key assets and they become tactical assets to ramp up the pressure on the defense and set up favorable 1-on-1 match-ups.
I do think we’ll have a deep passing game, and more fresh legs will wear out the DBs in the long run.
Unleashed from the totality of a complex passing game, the mission of the receivers will be simpler.
You got better bullets, post ’em. Some of the freshmen may fit into such a scenario even in limited action. To be able to pull a rabbit out of the hat, you gotta have a rabbit hidden away. This year GD should have a few. It bothers me that no one ever calls him an evil genius.
Agree about GD
He’s got a talented young QB in the offense he’s used to coaching. I think this group has a chance to be a great offense. The skill positions are set, so let’s put some beef on the grill…
1. Mason Walters- if he gets and stays healthy his potential is probably the greatest of the unproven guys this year.
2) David Snow- again a lot of potential, he could have really used a redshirt year
3) Tray Allen – I just love what he did to some tacklers last year. Order me up some pancakes.
4) Britt Mitchell- umm, who? He needs to be a huge surprise.
5) Barrett Matthews- Perhaps the key to the offense. How versatile he can be will help in a great way to determine how versatile the offense as a whole can be. I think GD will have some fun with this position this year. An effective TE/H-back has been sorely missed.
"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Aug 5, 2010 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd replace PB's #4 with #3
it’s all about offensive line for our offensive production. I think it’s pretty safe to say that if Gilbert has time, opponents are screwed.
by goingforthecorner on Aug 5, 2010 7:52 PM CDT reply actions

by 





























