Texas Longhorns Game Week: Five Things to Watch Against Wyoming
Will the Texas offense continue to be vanilla? In the lead up to the season, much of the talk centered around the "new" Texas running game. Playing under center for all but around 10 snaps against Rice, the 'Horns certainly had part of the downhill equation working, in that the running back had a running start when receiving the handoff, but not so much in terms of any aggressive, man-blocking adjustments -- the main running play remained the inside zone, as it has been for some time.
The thought here is that the Texas coaches will remain stubborn with the running game, wanting to see if the team can execute despite the defense knowing what is coming once again this week. Additionally, as they often do early in the season, the Texas coaches talk a lot about wanting to keep opponents from having film on what they are doing.
So don't expect to see a lot of movement pre snap -- the multiple, Boise State-style offense anticipated for this season. Don't expect to see Barrett Matthews sliding from H-back to fullback to act as a lead blocker. Or DJ Monroe or Marquise Goodwin doing much with the jet sweep series either.
If Texas can wrest control off the game early from what will be an emotional Cowboy football team, this week should be more of the same -- an offensive gameplan as nondescript as a Toyota Corolla and probably a little less exciting.
Can Tre' Newton earn a repeat Flavor of the Week Award? Without a Morning Coffee this week, there wasn't an opportunity to talk about the newest Flavor of the Week for the season, the second winner even though there haven't even been two games played yet. That would be redshirt sophomore running back Tre' Newton, who was the most effective of the three backs in using his vision and patience to hit the proper holes. It's known now that he isn't a home run threat, but the ability to consistently pick up positive yardage and make the right play -- in other words, be the very definition of "steady" -- that has to this point make Newton stand out among the running backs, according to Mack Brown:
Tre’ has a great knack for finding the hole and then he has this burst that he gets through it. We laughed. We didn’t make the third and two, but he scored three times on the goal line and when you guys interview him I try to watch the interviews and see what our kids are saying, and Tre’ said, ‘Boy when I feel that goal line I can just smell it.’ Well I’m going to tell him, ‘When you feel that first-down marker, smell it too because it smells good. It’s the same.’ He’s one of those guys like Cedric Benson that allows the hole to open up and then he finds it. He’s very patient as a runner and I think that’s what makes him so good.
After Cody Johnson missed some open running lanes last week -- whether due to his injured ankle or not -- simply making the most of out every opportunity available will help and it shouldn't come as a surprise that the Texas running game this season will go as far as the offensive line will take it in terms of moving the line of scrimmage or creating holes for whichever running back does happen to be the Flavor of the Week.
One of the keys will be to do a better job on the backside of plays, where EBS had some issues letting defenders cross his face and the backside of the line struggled to open up the cutback lanes that are easier to see and hit with the running back having different aiming points in the zone scheme when the offense is under center.
Can Texas do a better job on special teams? It would be harsh to say that the special teams were a disaster last week -- after all, a disaster would be more like what happened last year against Wyoming with the failed fake punt and the blocked punt returned for a touchdown. No, last week was simply a poor performance, mostly all around, whether it was Justin Tucker being unable to put the ball into the end zone on kickoffs, missing two field goals, or both Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams fielding punts on the bounce dangerously and Williams muffing the punt late in the game.
Mack Brown speculated this week that Tucker may have had a tired leg, a sorry excuse considering how early in the season it is. What will happen after kicking off repeatedly during the season and handling field goals as well? If Brown's statement was true, that would be as bad or worse than the lie after Tucker supposedly was putting the ball deep in the end zone all fall camp, as he did publicly during the open practice. Will Russ looked worse than Tucker at that time, so he doesn't look like an answer right now.
And the tired leg doesn't bode well for field goal kicking, even though Tucker had plenty of distance on both 50-yard attempts, including the made field goal on his first collegiate try that would have been good from more than 55 yards out. Another field goal attempt was partially blocked.
On punt returns, can Brown and Williams show off better decision-making skills? And will the Longhorns be able to block a punt after Mack Brown noted that the Posse should have blocked one last week? As for changing personnel to get faster upmen on the field, Brown simply noted that the team will be happy to take the ball near the 50 every time if opponents continue to kick away from the speedy Monroe/Goodwin tandem.
Will a second defensive tackle flash? Besides Kheeston Randall at nose guard, the defensive tackles were pretty silent last week against Rice. Not unexpected, but certainly not a great sign moving forward. Tyrell Higgins was mostly a non-factor and struggled mightily taking on double teams -- as much work as he has done in the weight room, he's still not capable of taking on two blockers and holding his ground. Calvin Howell didn't show anything. Neither did Alex Okafor, playing for the first time inside in a game situation.
Will anyone besides Randall be able to make some plays this week? Certainly, the expectation isn't for game-changing plays from those players, but can they have some positive impact on the game to build on moving forward?
How will Wyoming respond to the tragic death of LB Ruben Narcisse? The Wyoming football family lost a member this week in a car accident, a situation that recalls the death of Texas football Cole Pittman. In the face of such tragedies, sports often provides a welcome respite from the pain and loss. The question for the Wyoming football team is whether or not they can collectively channel that emotion towards a stronger performance on the football field. Regardless, the best wishes of BON go out to the whole Wyoming football team and the Narcisse's grieving family. The hearts of Texas are with you all.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I still don't understand this "not wanting other coaches to know what they are going to".
I don’t want to question coaches bc our their success but what does this really do for us? We need to work on what we think will win us ballgames down the road. And we need to work on these in game situations. How do you know what you have until you actually try to use it?
So what if we tip our hat to our “good” opponents. If we’re really good at what we do, then you will not be able to stop it. And you can also look at it the other way, if opponents are looking at our tape of what we’re really good at, perhaps we can throw in some trickery there.
I understand there might be a few things we might not want to show (like Shipley lining up against OU as our “TE” in 2008), but I really think we should bring our best week in and week out and let our opponents figure out how to stop us.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
by Sunkist on Sep 10, 2010 4:09 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
It's got something to do w/ GD
I think the recent stretch of success against OU has been with this philosophy of playing plain and then introducing a few wrinkles in the OU game.
It’s unlikely they’re going to deviate from the formula.
They know that winning the OU game is the key to winning the Big 12 South, and the hearts and minds of Texas fans.
It worked in 2008 and that's about it. Not sure any other year it really worked.
We were ugly in 2009 so I don’t buy it. I don’t want to hear that Colt was “sick”. Our defense kept us in the game and we would’ve likely lost it had Bradford remained in the game.
I do enjoy our success against OU lately, so maybe I will just have to “buy” it.
I want to be excited about our new weapons on offense but we aren’t even showcasing any of them.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Well to be fair, in 2009 we also stunk at the end of the year against Neb.
So I’m not sure holding things back hurt us at all.
My point is, it’s built into GD’s mindset now that this is a good thing to do. I imagine we’re going to see exactly the same thing against Wyoming as we did against Rice.
GD/Mack don’t think we got it right the first time, so why move on? More reps is the answer right now.
They are really being stubborn about the running game.
Yes, we need to fix it. Yes we need some answers there, but we also have a new QB that needs to throw the ball. When are we going to learn our lesson that throwing the ball is the strength of the team? Against Tech in Lubbock when we are down by a few touchdowns again? We need to let the horses out of the game right now.
We can all agree that when it comes down to a big important play, it’s going to be Gilbert’s arm and not our running game that makes the big plays for us. We all know that. I’m not saying we throw it every time (though that’s where our strengths are), but we need to get Gilbert going as well. We don’t have Shipley out there right now and Gilbert needs to find out who his most reliable WRs are too.
If we are to be an elite team this years, it’s Gilbert that holds the keys..not our running game.
I guess it’ll be another snoozer against Wyoming. I love a great running game but we just don’t have it. I guess we’ll find out against Wyoming and then see what happens in Lubbock.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
*out of the gate right now
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
In 2008
it wasn’t like we were working on Shipley in the TE spot in fall camp. Irby got hurt so they had to make a last minute change. I’m not sure Shipley at TE was a saved lineup for OU.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2010 9:26 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Really
Feel the same about this. Open up the playbook. It’s a game, not a scrimmage. People are paying money to see your team play, not sleepwalk through the game. And why save the more complicated stuff for when we least want to try it out (in Lubbock, OU, Lincoln). I’d rather actually have confidence in the plays instead of using them for the first time in a hostile environment. At least stuff that’s going to be a pivotal part of our offensive plan. I don’t mean show every triple reverse pass, but at least get Matthews, Monroe, and the passing game into some kind of flow within the system. Ugh.
It is frustrating me.
Why can’t they think, “Hey, let’s show off our weapons maybe this will intimidate us?”
I really don’t think Venables & Pelini really fall for our tactics. They are smarter than this.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
okay it's friday and I can't type. ** maybe this will intimidate THEM
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
Intimidation doesn't really accomplish that much
Defense is naturally reactive. Make a read, react. There are elements of pressure, scheme, etc. that defense accomplishes, but the role of defense is to slow, stop, or repel offense, whether we’re talking about football or real battle. Intimidation tips the hand, makes the opponent actually game up even stronger, and makes it harder to win.
A money quote: “A military operation involves deception. Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent. Though effective, appear to be ineffective..”
That comes from this book, which was the basis of an entire semester of my first grad program. Our most accomplished generals, including Gen. Petraeus and my old chief, Gen. Ray Odierno, are students of strategy, and the precepts are apparent in much of their strategy. Coaching football is relatively insignificant compared to the intended applications, but the strategy is adaptable to almost any situation.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 10, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Straight out of the Sun Tzu playbook. Niiiice.
I think that we’ll take it to another level: even if we are infact incompetent, we will fool Venables into thinking that we are competent. Spending all week prepping for the power,
jet sweep, draw, presnap motion, and other shenanigans, OU will be stricken with terror and flee the field after we repeatedly come at them with the inside zone and very basic play action routes.
by Tackchevy on Sep 10, 2010 9:30 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Well we saw last week
against Rice how good a little change of pace can work against a fast aggressive defense. Rice came out in the first few drives and had success running zone read plays. Now eventually we adjusted and shut it down but they were able to move the ball despite being athletically outmatched.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2010 9:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I think it's similar to when DKR was worried about Switzer spying on our practices.
You always want to catch the other team looking for the wrong tendencies.
It's a basic precept of strategy
If you don’t want the other coaches to know what you’re going to do, why not just publish the playbook online? With similarities in terms of talent and depth, the element of surprise is absolutely crucial when facing a team like Oklahoma.
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
by burntorangehorn on Sep 10, 2010 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions
The Dave Cambell Show on the radio
said GG was locking into his WR last week. I’m going to look for that.
I think Texas will be a little more aggressive this week with play calling. Boise plays this team soon and you know everyone will be making comparisons.
I didn't see that much...
What I did see was the coaching staff cut the field in half so that he only has a 2 reads (and possibly a dump off) on any given pass play.
the man, the myth, the legend.
Pretty much what I saw
However there was one third down play where GG watched Malcolm run his entire 10 yard curl and then tried to fire it in there. The linebacker was able to undercut the route from the inside and nearly intercepted it. When I got home and rewatched this play on DVR I noticed Barrett Matthews standing wide open with no one covering him for a first down had Garrett looked to the opposite hash.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2010 9:35 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I hope not
If he is doing that then it might take longer for GG to develope.
I heard the same thing about Mike Davis
Being open, sometimes wide open, on a few occasions and GG not seeing him.
Not unexpected by 1st or 2nd year QBs.
by Horncasting on Sep 10, 2010 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes
On the deep ball GG completed to Malcolm, Mike D had 5 yards on his man for a sure TD on a well thrown ball.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 11, 2010 2:42 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Here's what I learned about Mike Davis
I was at the Rice game and had seats at the goal line just above Bevo. Here’s my take. If Mike Davis comes back to the huddle and says something like…“hey Grapes I’ve got this guy, I’m open man”…believe him.
by orangetower on Sep 11, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps I am missing something
but GoBR, this Corolla has a spoiler, sir.

by Infield Elephant on Sep 10, 2010 4:30 PM CDT reply actions
A Corolla... Really?
You would think a Texas Lexus or a Howdy Audi maybe.
alright i'll say it if noone else will....
SPOILER ALERT!
by dukeoforange on Sep 11, 2010 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions
What's the point of this post?
We need to be focusing on Nebraska
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
by circa1015 on Sep 10, 2010 4:52 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Sarcasm?
Stumpy: It's called the '80s. Ford was president, Nixon was in the White House, and FDR was running this country into the ground. I was bummin' in a hole-in-the-wall town in what is now called "Utah".
Sorry...
didnt read the previous thread about Nebraska. Funny, and noted. :)
Stumpy: It's called the '80s. Ford was president, Nixon was in the White House, and FDR was running this country into the ground. I was bummin' in a hole-in-the-wall town in what is now called "Utah".
Faster upmen on kickoffs?
No, you want guys who can catch the ball (and know when to get out of the way).
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
TIRED LEGS?
Tucker has tired legs in the first game on the first kickoff? Cody Johnson had tired legs before he had a sprained ankle. Somebody needs to rethink our workout strategy or make sure we always play Rice on the first game.
Or come up with better excuses.
I think Colt is still suffering from flu-like symptoms.
by Horncasting on Sep 10, 2010 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Amusing...
It’s always amusing when fans seem to think they know better than Mack Brown. They knew better than John Mackovic, of course. If they were born, they knew better than David McWilliams, and better than Fred Akers. Perhaps they even could out-coach Coach Royal!
I find it highly unlikely. I’m not saying that Coach Davis — who has adapted to the talents of Ricky, the Major, Chris Simms, VY, Colt and is now adjusting to GG — and Mack don’t make mistakes. I’m saying that they’ve dedicated their waking lives to the college athletes and the game of football, and that they’ve been the most consistent pair of coaches at it for the last decade. The classiest, too.
Whom
Are you even talking to? This is a MESSAGE BOARD. People come here TO DISCUSS THE TEAM. Are we all supposed to gather round and sing the praises of said team every single game without ever offering an actual opinion? How boring would that be?
You haven't responded to my critique
People who know little about football, pretending to know more than they know. OK, so they can have fun on a message board, and entertain themselves. Fair enough. It won’t be boring. But you also won’t be coming up with valid critiques of the coaching staff.
For example, fans are unaware of almost all of what is truly going on inside the locker room, and so won’t understand many of the decisions made by a coach. It might explain why one player sits, and another plays.
A coach may be thinking long-term, the way the USA basketball coaching staff under Krzyzewski is handling the FIBA tournament. Previously, the USA went all-out, and tried to dominate every game, every minute — and we won early, but got beat eventually. Many fans would rather have had us dominate Rice, and reveal our hand to OU and Nebraska, but Mack chose not to. Would you rather have us win all our games, or come **** close to it, or destroy Rice and Wyoming?
Coaches do a lot of things that the fan just doesn’t get. Do you want 10-14 wins? Or do you want to see a lot of trick plays and watch us humiliate an outmatched opponent? The coach wants to keep his job, and wants to help the players succeed, and learn the game, and for them to graduate, and for some of them to go on to the NFL as players, and some to become coaches. That’s what the coach wants. What the fan wants is different, just as what you want is different, as a message board user.
So, have fun on your message board, but don’t confuse yourself with a coach.
Have you ever read this board?
Because “people who know little about football” is the last way I would describe the editors and writers of BON and the majority of the BON community.
Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.
So...let me get this straight
You whine and complain about how people are questioning the coaches, then you condescendingly tell me (and everybody else) to “have fun on [my] message board” like I am a five-year-old. I believed that necessitates the question, “Why do you even post here?”
To follow up on Em’s point: I can guarantee you, sir, GOBR, PB, and some others here have forgotten more about football than you will ever know.
by GoHornsGo90 on Sep 11, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions
Kick offs into the endzone
One thing people need to realize when it comes to Tucker and Russ kicking off is that they are both capable of kicking the ball 5 yards deep into the endzone. The problem is that their trajectory on those kicks is at let’s say a 30 degree angle which doesn’t allow much time for the coverage team to get down the field. So if the return man runs it out he still has plent of green in front of him before our defenders get there. Our coaches understand this so they ask Tucker to kick the ball with a trajectory of around 45 degrees which allows for more hangtime, and theoretically better coverage.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 10, 2010 9:43 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
"Will the Texas offense continue to be vanilla?"
It seems like we as fans will go through the same phases of frustration as we did last year, after watching a pedestrian offensive performance early in the season:
(1) blame the early offensive struggles on a lack of Greg Davis’ creativity. It’s alright, we’ll throw the kitchen sink at the big boys!
(2) realize that our skilled position players aren’t playing up to the hype as suggested by their star-rating on Rivals
(3) finally arrive to the conclusion that our offensive line is by far the weakest link on the team, and continues to let down our quarterback (not to mention that we once again have no tight end that comes remotely close to replacing the value lost from the Blaine Irby injury)
(4) understand that the only way we’ll get back to the championship game is if once again, Muschamp’s defense and our special teams gift wrap us points that our offense couldn’t generate on its own.
by goingforthecorner on Sep 11, 2010 1:00 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah
Hopefully this isn’t correct, but so far it sounds about right. I’ll give it a few more games, of course. It’s too soon this season IMO. Not discounting the validity of the statement, but I’d definitely like to give it more than one game before basically saying “screw the offense” for the rest of the season.
I sure hope so
That will mean that we win another Big 12 championship.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 11, 2010 2:44 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
#3 remains my biggest concern
When Colt started in 06 he set a freshmen TD record. It’s not as though we just let him off the reins and said “go be Colt McCoy”. He wasn’t really a known quantity that year. But we had a NC caliber O-line, and behind it he mostly kicked ass. Next year, O-Line graduates to the NFL, and Colt’s soph. slump ensues.
I just feel like we could get so much more from GG if the line was solid. So, so much more.
I think we're passing judgment on the line too quickly
There was some stuff they needed to clean up last week, but the coaches basically asked them to line up and beat a team that knew what was coming and that seems to be how the coaches wanted it. Besides the two false starts and the problems on the backside, it was a passable performance. There are certainly concerns, obviously, and in that sense the play-action passing game will be Gilbert’s best friend. Let’s just hold off an excoriating them until they actually have a bad game.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 11, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
I had to Wiki that one...:)
excoriating
For the sake of my fellow BONizers
(transitive) To wear off the skin of; to chafe or flay.
(transitive) To strongly denounce or censure. [quotations ▼]
I agree with GOBR. It’s too early in the season to be excoriating anyone, even our fellow posters, and yes folks this includes Greg Davis, EBS, OL, or any of our other familiar whipping posts.
Not trying to plagiarize, it just helped me to use it in a sentence.
Yeah, it's wait and see at this point.
Show me something, Horns!
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 11, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
































