Postgame React: Texas Defeats Texas Tech 24-14
The outcome was: Outstanding. It was an ugly football game -- a choppy affair that seemed to last forever, featuring one turnover after another. It was also a football game in Lubbock, the Bermuda Triangle of college football... and Texas won.
Had we been told before the game that Texas would walk out the stadium winners of a 24-14 game, we all would have been delighted for the news. The way it played out, by the end I felt exhausted... and relieved. But I'm also delighted. And excited. And though certain aspects of our performance are worrisome for what's ahead, that's secondary. We won a wild, bizarre game in Lubbock despite turning the ball over 4 times.
Here's what I'm getting at: During Mack Brown's tenure we've lost three South Division championships at the hands of losses in Lubbock. Tonight, we won, and at this point that's what matters. We did it with an inspired defensive performance, something we hadn't had in any of our three previous losses at Tech.
This was an enormously important, gratifying win.
Offensive Quick Thoughts: On the bright side, I actually feel pretty good about our personnel. On the downside, our execution was often lacking and our approach from a play calling perspective was uninspired, to put it charitably. To be sure, this was a weird game without much rhythm, featuring a number of failures that are squarely on the players' shoulders; but as things unwound, so did our offensive coordinator. Our offensive approach for the bulk of the final three quarters of the game was disheartening.
I expected Texas Tech to bring lots of heat at Garrett Gilbert, but they seemed mostly to play things straight up, forcing us to execute, and daring us to make them pay over the top. We did neither.
The single most discouraging thing about the game was our inability to run the ball with any consistency, and it's here that Greg Davis stands out as a culprit. It's not his fault that Malcolm Williams drops a wide open ball that gets intercepted, but it is his fault when his attempt to soften up the defense is ill-timed, ill-conceived reverses on 1st and 10. As the game got wild and woolly, our offensive coordinator lost his bearings. It's not something we didn't know he's prone to do, but it's always disappointing to see it happen, and it hurt my heart to hear a friend I was watching the game with mutter, "Christ almighty, it's the Chris Simms offense all over again."
Is it? If tonight's any indication, it very well might be, with all the wasted offensive plays -- the aforementioned reverses, a half dozen awful wide receiver screens, and a generally random offensive approach that demonstrated no understanding of how to systematically attack and work on a defense. It's clear that we have a lot of talent on offense, but very much unclear that we're able to put together a full-throttle attack. This is a better-coached Texas Tech defense than we're used to, but it's not a deeply talented group.
A few player notes:
Gilbert: There's so much to like, and his talent is undeniable, but I'm waiting to see the light come on for him. He's still young and still inexperienced, so there's no reason for anyone to try to draw any ultimate conclusions about him, but in terms of what to watch for, it's not whether he has the talent to be good -- he easily does, and is already quite good -- but whether he's got a special gear. Vince Young had it, and to a lesser degree Colt McCoy had it. My instinct is that Gilbert has it, too, but we haven't seen it yet. He's still feeling his way around a bit. The good news is that he's making some damn fine plays already, but the bad news is that as far as this year is concerned, he's got just one more week before we'll need him to elevate to a higher gear.
Running Backs: I was thrilled by Fozzy Whittaker's start to the game, but my excitement quickly waned as the running lanes disappeared. He's clearly our best option, but the running game issues are not about the tailbacks. They're systemic, and Fozzy finding himself is exciting insofar as it goes, but as we saw, isn't a silver bullet all its own. After the first quarter, we were miserable running the football, and it didn't matter who was in the game. More on this in a moment.
Receivers: We haven't been the biggest James Kirkendoll fans, but obviously, he came through in a big way tonight, catching 6 balls for 122 yards, critically moving the chains on several occasions. My knock on him has been his performances against elite defenses, and while I don't know that tonight counts in that regard, it certainly did in terms of it being a big game in a high-pressure environment. He got it done, and we desperately needed it -- a ten gallon hat tip to the senior for coming through.
Mike Davis was good once again, and continued to impress with the skills he possesses. He took some of the short junk that would have probably gone to Chiles and handled it fine. I'm glad he didn't get hurt.
Malcolm Williams had a huge drop, but the bigger shame is how poorly we continue to use him. In the passing game, we mostly use him like a possession receiver without big play potential. Our lack of creativity and vision in terms of a systematic attack hurts Williams more than anyone.
We seem to understand that Marquise Goodwin has big play potential, but thus far we mostly seem to think we're likely to get it from running short stuff and letting him go. Of course, he dropped the big play last week against Wyoming, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be going back to it more often.
Greg Smith was Greg Smith.
Barrett Matthews had an up-and-down game, but the play he made on the touchdown reception made his night a success. Watch the tape and note the exceptionally athletic play he makes to leap over a Tech defender to free himself as the receiver on the play. Nine times out of ten, a tight end gets caught up in the mess there and the play breaks down; Matthews managed to escape into space, catching the game-clinching touchdown. Hopefully, that's a turning point for him, because we're underutilizing him. It's been part his fault, and part Gilbert's, but among the signs that point to us having room to get better as an offense, I count Matthews high among them.
Offensive Line: I'll again save commentary until I review the tape, but in terms of first impressions: a disappointing night. Britt Mitchell is a liability. Michael Huey is just not the caliber of lineman I thought he was/would be. Our pass protection is actually fine, but I'll be interested to review the tape to see how and where we broke down on the night overall. Our tailbacks were running into piles of Tech defenders. It'll be interesting to look more closely at the tape tomorrow morning and find out why.
Defensive Quick Thoughts: All Hail William T. Muschamp! I don't know what Muschamp's middle name is, but I'm inclined to praise him with a middle initial, like the distinguished general that he is. In the form of Ulysses S. Grant, but with a tip of the cap to William Tecumseh Sherman, I'm from here forward referring to our fearless leader as William T. Muschamp. All Hail William T. Muschamp!
Needless to say, this game was won on the backs of the Longhorns defense, and if it can be harder to celebrate an "ugly" win carried by the defense, we should be no less excited about tonight's defensive triumph than we would have been had the offense carried us through to a 45-42 victory. The wins count all the same, and William T. Muschamp is the reason I'm not anywhere near thinking about the Chris Simms era. Whatever the fate of the offense, things are different. All Hail William T. Muschamp!
Defensive Line: Holt sh** these guys were amazing. Absolutely amazing. My game ball goes to Eddie Jones, who is about to start rocketing up NFL draft boards, if anyone's paying attention. He was absolutely brilliant: powerful, strong, technically superb, and faster-than-ever off the snap. He's been overshadowed by a slow to start to his career, and then the outstanding play of guys like Kindle and Sam Acho, but tonight he was the star of the show.
Tonight was a great example of the futility of getting hung up on the defensive depth chart. With Tech (sensibly) trying to pass their way to success against us, Muschamp heavily leaned on the quicker defensive line groupings, starting Jeffcoat opposite Jones, and using Sam Acho inside alongside Randall, plus heavy doses of Alex Okafor. It was strategically smart and worked exceptionally well. Okafor easily had his best game at his new position, performing well in a way that bodes well for the role we'll need him to play against Nebraska. His quickness is an important asset that Muschamp is going to be able to get a lot out of against the right opponents, and what we saw from Okafor tonight bodes well for his future inside.
Jeffcoat was again impressive, and it's just silly that he's a freshman. The blessing of having him right now is helping us to get the most out of a lot of other guys. Kheeston Randall continues to be an All-Big 12 performer, and is as important a player as any on the team heading forward.
Linebackers: Robinson and Acho played the vast majority of the snaps, and were mostly terrific throughout. Robinson was as good as we've come to expect him to be, and Acho continues to get closer and closer to being truly special. Emmanuel Acho's closing speed is just unfair, and with each passing game he's getting better and better at putting it to productive use. At times, he still gets somewhere too fast, taking himself out of the play, but more and more he's flowing to the right spots, and then finishing. As he perfects the practice, he's going to be exceptional.
Even when our front four isn't so dominant, we're a difficult team to run on because of these two. And the best is yet to come. That's exciting.
Secondary: My read of Tech's game plan was that after watching our first two games they felt their best chance to move the ball on us was through the short and intermediate passing game, spreading us out and forcing us to cover one-on-one, where we sometimes struggled with Chykie Brown and our safeties. Especially in the first half, that strategy found modest success, but on the whole -- and especially as the game wore on -- our secondary got the job done, in impressive fashion.
Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams were utterly phenomenal tonight, and Muschamp wisely used them to smother Potts' favorite targets, forcing Tech's quarterback to beat those two with great play or beat Texas with lesser talents. Overwhelmingly, Curtis Brown and Williams won those battles. Both should be considered for All-American votes.
Chykie was... Chykie. It's frustrating because of plays like the one he made in the fourth quarter, when he executed picture-perfect coverage on a deep ball, turned his hips, ran, looked back for the ball, and broke up the pass. Occam's Razor says it's mental, and hopefully that's a good sign for his ability to give us what we need heading forward; on the list of things that are correctable by a DB, that's surely the easiest.
Christian Scott was better in coverage tonight, playing passes more instinctively, as opposed to trying merely to keep things in front of him. Our safeties are still a point of relative weakness in the passing game, but our upcoming opponents aren't especially well-suited to make us pay for it. The '08 Sooners and Red Raiders would have presented a much tougher challenge.
Conclusion: It's an accident of history, but our defense under Muschamp is at this point still perpetually underrated. During last year's Red River Shootout, an ugly affair in which our defense was every bit as effective -- and probably more so -- than Oklahoma's, as the game wound down all Kirk Herbstret could talk about was the brilliance of the Sooners defense in shutting down the Texas attack. Tonight, Ron Franklin mentioned late in the fourth quarter, almost as an aside, that they hadn't paid much due to the performance of the Texas defense.
In the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really matter, of course, but for various reasons Texas football has been associated with its offense more so than its defense. With Vince Young and Colt McCoy at quarterback, and the defense lagging behind the offense for most of that time, it's understandable that the rest of the world has been slow to recognize the leap forward Texas has made defensively in the past 2.5 years.
In truth, after the brilliant offense of Colt McCoy carried us through the first half of 2008, falling one tragic play in Lubbock short of a national title berth, since the defense hit its stride in the back half of '08, it's been William T. Muschamp's charges that have been the difference between Texas football as it is now, and as it was when Mack Brown was still trying to elevate us to that next level. It was the offense that broke us through to begin with, but it's now the defense that's keeping us at the top.
Outside observers may be slow to realize it, but Texas is fielding the fastest, and overall best, defense in the conference, one that would be hailed as an elite force in the SEC. It's not what we've been known for, but it might start to be, especially if our offense continues to plod along deliberately.
All told, I'm happy. And I'll suggest that you should be, too. While we saw that the offense may not progress fast enough to take us on a title run until 2011, we also saw that this defense may be great enough to get us there right now.
It's hard to divorce our expectations from the progress of the offense....
But maybe we should.
138 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My love of Jeffcoat
Already unhealthy. Watching Jeffcoat and Jones battering back hapless tackles is just plain beautiful.
by CVictoryJoyously on Sep 19, 2010 1:55 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Jeffcoat gives me goose bumps.
All that talent and just a freshman. Imagine him as a sophomore, junior…
by dimecoverage on Sep 19, 2010 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions
I. Love. This. Kid.
And he’s from Plano like Robinson which is a double plus!
Only downside is they went to Plano West and Plano East. No one from Good Ol’ Plano Senior.
I've never been so proud to be from Plano West
I was bragging to everyone about how I went to school with him after his interception yesterday, lol.
Ha!
I’m pretty sure no high school produced more current starters for the Horns than mine!
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Great review
I find myself in agreement with everything. In fact, after the game, I texted out “Hail Will Muschamp” to a bunch of Horns fans I knew. What a defensive performance.
GD was killing me. We threw away so many first downs I lost count. I try to stay away from the auto-GD hate, but man, he had himself a rough night. The frustrating thing is that while I think our defense has more overall talent than our offense, it isn’t by THAT wide of a margin. The difference is that we’ve figured out how to utilize guys on D to their potential and have no such systematic understanding of our offense.
I thought Gilbert was fine, but he didn’t get a whole lot of help. Unfortunately, his stat line looks a bit bad with three picks, but oh well. He made some good throws and helped us get the win.
Britt Mitchell will be blocking Jeremy Beal. *shudders
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 19, 2010 2:16 AM CDT reply actions
There's not a lot of upside to the Mitchell/Beal matchup
except for hoping that maybe there will be a depth chart change before then. Mason Walters is looking solid and may be a future RT, I think we have some young guys who could fill in at RG. I just don’t see Mitchell matching up against OU, NU or Alabama.
I thought Davis’ game plan was dictated by the flow of the game. If Gilbert doesn’t get picked three times early it’s a different story. At that point you don’t want to risk an all-out turnover fiasco. If Malcolm Williams doesn’t get benched, if all those passes aren’t dropped- then you can step to the next level in play calling. But we weren’t even hitting on the basic stuff.
All in all a great win, Jackson Jeffcoat is gonna be scary good.
"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Sep 19, 2010 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Holding?
I couldn’t see Mitchell’s holding call on the long drive…how the hell can you hold (and get caught holding) while drive blocking?
And, it seems like ABC’s camera work left a lot to be desired.
by MesquiteHorn on Sep 19, 2010 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions
We need to use the UCLA game
to break in a new RT. My God…
Quickly watched the game a second time
as I was way too anxious to pay attention to details the first time through, and without the constant emotional baggage of having to beg the football gods for a win, the narrative of the game emerged a bit more clearly: basically Will Muschamp had his guys well-coached, well-disciplined, and well-prepared, and he had a gameplan, while Greg Davis did none of the above.
For most of the game, the ebb and flow was as follows:
Muschamp would miraculously shut down Tech’s offense [in Lubbock, no less] in just 3 or 4 plays…then our offense has a false start on first down, and then a dropped pass on the next play.
Then…Muschamp would miraculously shut down Tech’s offense [in Lubbock, no less] in just 3 or 4 plays…then our offense has a holding call on the first play, and then a dropped pass on the next.
Then…Muschamp would miraculously shut down Tech’s offense [in Lubbock, no less] in just 3 or 4 plays….and our offense would call an unnecessary reverse on 1st down, and drop a ball on the next play.
You get the idea.
I’ve been pissed at Greg Davis for years, but Will Muschamp should want to punch him in the face. Will actually does his job; his gameplans and adjustments rarely miss, and his players play with emotion. Meanwhile Davis, who has just as many blue-chip recruits at his disposal, continually misses with his scheming, instills no sense of purpose in his players, and can’t adjust to the game. His players are undisciplined, they have no identity, and they never seem to improve.
Its harder and harder to justify GD’s presence here with Muschamp standing as a foil on the other side of the locker room. Here you have a true and equal test: two coordinators are each given top-Texas talent, and one produces consistently, in spades, and the other disappoints…continuously. And if anything, a great defense is more difficult to craft these days than is a great offense. And considering Tech’s defense is not one of the better we’ll face this year, this offensive preparation was particularly embarrassing.
Otherwise, the other thing that stood out to me upon second viewing was Gilbert’s play. The kid is great. Although he hasn’t hit that intangible gear PB’s describing, I think he’s only a step away from playing as well as Ryan Mallet is playing right now. None of the picks was due to a bad decision; he’s made almost no really bad decisions this season. The balls the receivers were dropping were not being thrown too hard, and he made a couple of absolutely spectacular throws. If Gilbert is muffled, I’d say its because the staff is bringing him along too slowly and too conservatively. Rather than use his talent, he seems to be throwing the ball away or taking sacks more often than he needs to so as to avoid catastrophe, which seems more like Mack and Greg talking than it does GG.
I think he’s a year away from being one of the top QB’s in college football.
One other observation from the second viewing
If Leach is on the sidelines tonight, there is a very good chance we lose this game. I’ve grown so used to nightmare games in Lubbock in which any mistake at all spells certain death. But Tech didn’t really capitalize on our mistakes.
In fact, there were about 5 or 6 situations in which Tech faced 4th and 1 or 2 yards, and often in our territory. I remember the anxiety and frustration that against a Leach-coached team, you had to stop them 4 downs, not 3, and a stop on third down was not particularly relieving, because you had to face 4th down as well. It was nerve-racking. I’ll bet in this game tonight Leach goes for a lot of those, and converts one or two. That easily could have been the difference, particularly in terms of momentum.
But Tuberville, on 4th and 1, on our 35 yardline, just gives us the ball back, no questions asked. Wow. Really? Thanks. What a relief.
Tech just got a whole lot less scary.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 19, 2010 2:51 AM CDT up reply actions
I always appreciate your loquaciousness.
I, too get frustrated by the offensive woes this team seems to possess on an annual basis. When the momentum turned on the first pick which wasn’t GG’s fault, the offense lost something and for lack of a better word, we’ll call it mojo. This game was extraordinarily sloppy on the offensive side of the ball. Gobs of penalties were life suckers across the board. The D, like it or not, needs to have the bravado that most games are going to be on them. I’m convinced now more than ever that the NU game is going to be very difficult to win.
"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp
"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose
by Mulliganville on Sep 19, 2010 4:43 AM CDT up reply actions
I had the same thought about Leach.
Although I didn’t see much weakness in our defense ( – Chykie), a pirate-run offense would have scored enough to beat us.
I love boise state
Totally agree re: Tech on 4th down
How do you spell relief? Watching the Raider punt team trot onto the field!
41-38 !!
There are two positions I want replaced.
Those two positions are our offensive coordinator and our offensive line coach. Mcwhorter hasn’t had a good and consistent line in the last three years.
Greg Davis appears to be unable to scheme new things anymore or to make proper use of some of the talents at his disposal.
It frankly pisses me off to watch the offense a lot of the time. Tonight especially with the drops turning into interceptions and the 100+ minimum yard drive including the two holding calls and the false start. We looked pathetic out there tonight and if it weren’t for the defense, we would have our first loss of the season.
TEXAS FIGHT
Last two lines say it all
It’s hard to feel great about this team because of our current offensive production. However, thanks to our defense, it would be foolish to count us out in either (or any, if you buy into UCLA/A&M) of the remaining high-profile showdowns this season.
At this point, I just hope we can throw down a solid offensive game next week against UCLA before the OU game. Need to get the offense—and especially GG—some momentum heading into Dallas.
I don't know
I think it would be easy to say he has too many weapons and he’s trying too much. The first two games were so vanilla and still nothing happened. Like BH says above, it just doesn’t seem he has a concise game plan or feel for the game. We have first down on the 11. He runs Cody for 5 yards, 2nd down her runs Cody for 4 yards, 3rd down and 1 he runs a QB sneak. WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT?!?!?!? At that point the game plan is writing itself. Why would you want to go F it up?
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
I think they were afraid of another int.
As I have said before, it is difficult to criticize GD because we don’t know how many of the decisions are being made by him and how many by Brown. He does seem to be very good with QB’s, as evidence by Young and McCoy and hopefully by Garrett. Isn’t there a principle of business that people tend to be promoted to one level above where they are really competetent? Perhaps GD should be QB coach. I don’t know what the problem is, or who to blame, but it is curious that a university whose name used to synonymous with great running backs hasn’t had a significant running game in several years. Sometimes I think it takes too long for the play to develop, too often they are running east-west rather than downhill, but even when they try to run north/south, there don’t seem to be any holes or the back can’t break any tackles. Finally, as far as the 3 runs inside the 12 go, they had thrown 3 interceptions inside FG range, and I suspect Brown didn’t want to risk again coming away with nothing. .
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
True, but Mack can and does direct GD to run certain things.
He’s made him stop passing or passing at certain times. You might say he directs the flow of the calls without interfering in specific calls…Mack has the benefit of being on the sidelines so he has a direct feel for the game, the state of the players and feedback from the other coaches around him. GD, via headphones, gets some of that, but Mack has more context and obviously grasps the longer term implications that Greg doesn’t necessarily have time to consider in the hectic flow of the game.
So, it’s not like Mack doesn’t have any input…he does. He just doesn’t micromanage GD.
You missed the point
You don’t have to throw. Your beast RB just reeled off 9 yards in two plays, keep the momentum going. Stop running QB sneaks.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions
I can't see any method whatsoever.
I don’t think GD scripts for the early games at all, which he has referenced to the press before.
My statement perhaps should have been expanded…while GG has to know everything in the playbook, GD is restricting access to many of the knives. If he is hiding anything from the likes of OU and NU, it would be blocking assignments and the plays that go with them. It looks like a rope-a-dope to the outside observer, same old stupid shit, bad runs, good short to medium passes with more long bombs thrown in.
Plus, without a cohesive offensive scheme, GD induces a certain chaos and outright illogical conclusions with his calls. I don’t think that fools many experienced OCs but it must make them pause to wonder wtf is he doing, what is he hiding, when in fact he may be hiding nothing.
Mack and GD has seemed to grow somewhat more paranoid about secrecy and outside access over the last several years. Their revelation last year that they do hold things back opens the door to my observation from that point of view and the resultant speculation.
So, I see they are trying a lot of stuff…some of it they will never use…just to confuse the game plans and diminish the practice time opponents have for focusing on the important things.
Image this: the OU LB says he never wants to see that (AF’s) option again. Against UCLA we run a wishbone offense for several plays, a couple of times at mid field, and on the goal line, where there would be a real logic to its usage. If you’re OU’s DC, what do you do? Ignore it completely, spend a little time just to brush up, spend several hours during the week just to get the basics of defending it down?
Not saying we’d do that with the wishbone….but I am saying we would do a comparable thing with some of our play calling. You can chew on this bone a great deal because it is an interesting look at the pre-game chess game.
Since clearly we cannot run the ball at all,
as a team, let’s just abandon the run totally. If I have to watch another running play where our back disappears into a pile of players (where there is, for whatever reason, absolutely nothing resembling a running “lane”) and emerges for a 1-2 yard gain, I’m going to lose it. This is getting comical. How does a team with such highly ranked incoming talent not just run over the opposition? I mean, fine, Tech is talented, but we looked pretty incompetent against Rice and Wyoming too. My brain fails to understand.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on Sep 19, 2010 4:34 AM CDT reply actions
One thing I learned in '08
Muschamp could be the absolute pinnacle when it comes to half time adjustments.
by KratosWasASooner on Sep 19, 2010 5:28 AM CDT reply actions
What happened to DJ Monroe
Comes in and plays one down? Didn’t get a first down? He must me in a major doghouse. Or Greg Davis should is an idiot!
All in all it’s a win. Ugly but it was a win. I think we are going to struggle against stronger Big 12 comp. We will roll UCLA.
I just can’t seem to figure out what the hell Davis is thinking with this offense. It’s official we are not a running team. The O line can pass block but the run blocking is not there.
Monroe
Is a specialty player. He’s too small to be an every down back. We probably just have a handful of plays for him and we’ve got to save some looks for OU.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:07 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Peter..
I do not share your optimism from the linebacker crew. Keenan Robinson showed his (excellent) speed chasing down rushing plays on the outside that gained a large chunk of yadage.
Emanuel acho was constantly out of position on plays that needed to be made. I gues i am guilty of projecting his older brother’s talent onto him regardlesss, e. acho has to hold down the center of the field better. im not a coach :), but i like to think that i have some semblence of whats going on!
They had -14 yards rushing
I guess I missed those long runs to the outside. Seriously, I think the grades will be pretty high.
"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Sep 19, 2010 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm watching the replay today
I’ll watch the LBs more closely and let you know if there’s reason to revise my opinion. As I said in the review, Acho runs himself out of the play sometimes, but he was more excellent than not last night. At least I think so. Looking forward to watching the replay.
You ain't hurt...
Sacks
account for the majority of the negative rushing yards. I saw E Acho overrun a couple of outside runs but if your going to miss the tackle he did well turning the ball carrier back to the inside.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:10 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Scorched Earth
Your thoughts align perfectly with what we are seeing. While I don’t prescribe to the “lipstick on a pig” euphemism, our offense is mired in hog slop. The outcome tastes good on a BLT, you just don’t want to know how it’s made, what it eats, or where it sleeps. Pee-yew.
The blame is equally shared between coaches and players. However, players have to execute. You can draw up all the plays and schemes in the world but you can’t do anything about the continued NOS penalties, missed assignments, dropped passes, etc, etc. When your team is backed up due to these mistakes, what else is a coordinator to do? For one thing, I say, the players need a do over. A mulligan. There’s no need to abandon a perfectly sound schematic if a particular play does not work here or there. I say keep going back to it because its repetition we need on our basic downfield plays.
Funny you should mention coach Muschamp is middle initial worthy. I had that same thought in the first half. Although your angle is better than mine, the fact is one could argue his schemes and use of personnel are every bit as revolutionary as coach Bellard’s wishbone. Sexy.
And a big shout out to our special teams play. Only one mistake all night, Kenny’s aggressive punt roughing penalty. Other than that, our kickoff and punting defense was consistent, and Justin Tucker pinned their ears back. Not a big fan of the non-traditional rugby punting, but he really rose to the occasion with 3 out of his 4 punts nailed inside their 20.
BS
Gideon hit the guy with his shoulder in his chest. BAD CALL.
by Longhorns84 on Sep 19, 2010 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions
On the other hand...
…could you BELIEVE the football gods gave him another opportunity at a basket-catch interception in Lubbock?!?! I almost fell off my barstool at the coincidence/irony/karma/whatever of that moment.
41-38 !!
Never heard of it?
Wasn’t Gideon quoted last week after being flagged that he never heard of “targeting”? If there is a new rule or something the officials are going to be especially watching for, it seems like the coaches should have informed the team clearly and repeatedly.
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
I think the rule has been around for some time
The term “targeting” is fairly new. Gideon’s play was legit — real close to a penalty, and he got flagged. But . . . if the receiver makes the catch, his hit is perfect because it’s going to jar the ball loose.
It's a horrible change in emphasis
I get that they’re trying to protect players but what is Gideon supposed to do? When you watch the replay in slo-mo it looks like he makes a bonehead play, but if you watch it in real speed he only has a fraction of a second to make the decision of whether he should go for the kill shot to try and force an incompletion or side step the receiver and possibly give up a huge gain if the ball is caught.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:17 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Gilbert
I agree with your assessment that he’s not there yet. It would be hard not to. However, early in the game, I really thought the light was about to come on, and then the two tipped picks happened. And the dropped pick by Malcolm. I really think that sucked his confidence. You could almost see his feet get happier and happier. Now you could easily say if the light had come on he moves past that and injects confidence in his teammates and makes plays, and to a certain extent he sill made some plays, but it’s hard to throw a kid out there in his first road start with a line he doesn’t trust, receivers dropping balls, and no running game to speak of and expect him to make “The Leap.”
That said he does have a ways to go, but as you mentioned the potential is exciting.
'Til Gabriel blows his horn...
O-line
I know this topic has been debated tirelessly, however, as has been said before I think it comes down to recruiting, and for a different reason. As everyone knows, we rely almost solely on in-state players for recruiting, for good reason, and its been greatly successful. However, if you watch high school football around the state, almost everyone (especially the elite teams) runs a version of the spread or zone running scheme and that creates linemen who are used to pass blocking and finesse running. Now, if we’re planning on changing to a pro-style running attack and drive blocking, we are going to have to be very selective on who we select in state and go out of state at a little higher rate.
Now, it does look like Mack is coming to this conclusion (Westerman, Hegarty) so I’m not too worried. It does look like its starting to carry over to the defense too, as we are starting to go a little more out of state for linebackers (Hicks, 2012 target Kwon Alexander) because of the lack of true linebackers in state because of the spread phenomenon. It will be interesting to see if high schools start to change their styles as Texas changes.
'Til Gabriel blows his horn...
Spread is Run in Every State
Watching these high school games on ESPN, it seems teams from other states are running the spread too. I still believe McWhorter is hurting us technically and recruiting wise. For whatever reason he’s not getting it done and is not “coaching up” our line. I finally saw Mack yell at him on the sidelines last night so I hope that’s a sign of things to come…
The slow wave is our best weapon.
I wonder
how much the lack of preparation in fall camp has to do with performance. Cutting was banned. Seems to me you play like you practice. No one wants injuries but how in the hell do you expect lineman to perform if they can’t simulate game technique. Mystery question.
Both great points
Texantt: You’re certainly right about the spread being nationwide, but it has it’s roots in Texas with 7-on-7 I believe. Just seems like a higher percentage of Texas schools run it. But you’re right, it’s everywhere.
TXStampede: Great point. I heard about that and the NFL style camp that’s light on the hitting. No question we practice like we play. It would be hard to just expect someone to execute something in a game that they’ve never practiced.
'Til Gabriel blows his horn...
sorry
but anyone who says zone blocking is ‘finesse’ doesn’t understand what they’re watching
two guys double-teaming one defensive lineman is not ‘finesse’ regardless of whether it is zone blocking or rule-blocking
By definition, defensive linemen are smaller than their OL counterparts because they need to be faster and quicker to react to the offensive play. Let two guys who are bigger than you attack you and shove you around while you try to resist, and tell me how ‘finesse’ you think it is.
I think the major problem for texas is in player evaluation and development on the line; to blame it on the offensive scheme high schools are running is laughable.
Offensive plays
What really infuriated me were the half-assed “trick” plays. Are we really spending precious practice time on this crap?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Agreed.
It seems to me you go to trick plays when you don’t have the personnel, when you are the underdog, and/or you’re behind and have lost the momentum. Especially questionable were the abortive wide-receiver pass and reverses when we were clinging to a 3-point lead and were making mistakes right and left. As the announcers pointed out, that was not what to call when you want to settle your team (and young QB) down.
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
Because
Everyone’s been complaining about the lack of innovation in our offense for the last few seasons. The staff went up to Boise to pick their brains on trickeration and so now we’re running the stuff. There are definitely two camps on this, but I’m not in the trick play one.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:26 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
maybe he can be like DKR ...
…and put his mother’s first name initial as his middle name.
by vy til i die on Sep 19, 2010 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd compare Boom to Stonewall Jackson, come on this is the South
William “Stonewall” Muschamp. Works for me.
The defense was tremendous in this game. Tech had one successful drive. One. Holy s***, I didn’t see that coming. Chykie not being Chykie, and Britt Mitchell cutting Justin Smith and this one was a shut out.
Boom continues to show just how valuable he is to Texas. Best coach on the staff, and it’s not even close. Georgia is now 0-2 in the SEC and I am very worried. The Dawgs get Green back after Mississippi State, but in a year where Richt is coaching for his job, 0-2 in conference is not the way to get started. I think Boom gets a Georgia booster phone call this afternoon. Be leery.
The offense would be wise to use Roberson at fullback much, much more often. He’s a good lead blocker and our backs need somebody to open up holes for them. Getting hit at the line of scrimmage and then fitting for 2 yards is not getting it done.
Any win in the Tech Tards’ hamlet is a good win. Tech will not ruin our season this year and it feels good.
by billfromlaketravis on Sep 19, 2010 8:16 AM CDT reply actions
Stonewall works nicely
As I said below, I like the imagery of Muschamp’s defense slashing and burning everything in their path, but Stonewall has a great ring to it, too.
You ain't hurt...
But Stonewall was killed by his own team
If we call him Stonewall we’re just asking the offensive staff to put the D in horrible situations.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:28 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
So that would have been a good nickname for Bradford last season?
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'd rather see a full back than two Tight ends also..
Atleast give the running back someone to hide behind before he gets demolished so he’s not going into the fight alone.
Apologies to all for my behavior last night
Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.
drunk posting
very drunk posting. Aftermath of ND’s loss.
Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.
I didn't find
any foul language from you. Your civility was there at the very least. Come to think of it, I’m embarrassed and you’re way much better than me :)
You ruled my friend.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions
Your friend is easily subverted
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Our friend, no?
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions
You said that she ruled your friend.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 20, 2010 2:24 AM CDT up reply actions
lol

Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.
You were the highlight of the post game thread, from what I saw this morning
May I suggest a keyboard with bigger keys before the ND-Stanford game?
proud to swim home
by learned hand on Sep 19, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions
with each passing week
I become more and more concerned that we won’t be able to hold on to Muschamp until Mack retires. With Georgia (his alma mater) struggling I think the likelihood that Richt gets fired escalates each week. On top of that, I can tell you that LSU fans are very frustrated with Les Miles and would love to bring Muschamp on board as his replacement. Et’s hope his love of Austin and desire to take over in a few years is enough to override all that temptation.
"But tonight the Superbowl belongs to the City of New Orleans" - Roger Goodell 2/7/2010
Maybe I am idolizing a little or creating an unrealistic pedestal for Muschamp, but I think he likes what he has been building here in Austin. I am praying he stays because of his commitment to the recruits and parents as well as his pride in what is happening in Austin – with the last few recruiting classes he has mustered, we are looking at a defensive dynasty. UT needs to make him the highest paid DC in the country, if he is not already.
Two Games of Vanilla Followed by Abslolute Chaos on Offense
Good grief. Is this what your King and Savior GD has been saving up for, guys? That MESS we call an offense on show in Lubbock last night? Frankly, the sooner we accept this year as a rebuilding year and lose that #6 ranking the better. This is NOT a national championship caliber team. I don’t even think it’s a Big 12 champ team.
In-VINCE-able.
You may want to keep in perspective how poor the majority of the top 25 are playing.
I think we are on par with most of those teams. UT’s offense will get better.
ATX
Good one! nt
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
Damn the PC term
As a DC, William “Stonewall” Muschamp rolls off of the tongue and speaks to the truth he motivates!
It does
Stonewall has a great ring to it. I like the imagery of him slashing and burning, a la Gen. Sherman, but Stonewall works well, too.
You ain't hurt...
No way I am supporting anything to do with Gen. Sherman
Last I checked we are in the South. I will not refer to Boom as William T.
William B. Muschamp
B for Bedford. Pick a favorite. I don’t care which general. Just salute the general, damnit.
You ain't hurt...
Considering the recent Simkins nonsense
Maybe we should avoid the Forrest references.
Jan Žižka was a true defensive genius; thus I propose: William Z. Muschamp!
Your Man In the Balkans
Good...
…I challenge all here to find ANYTHING in Texas named for William Tecumseh Sherman.
by MesquiteHorn on Sep 19, 2010 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions
GD routine play call last night several times
1st down – run for 1 yard
2nd down – run for 2 yards
3rd down – we have forced our young QB into a third a long position on the road
I have taken a different approach to GG
than others. By that I mean I have resisted the urge to crown him anything solely on his pedigree or his accomplishments in high school or by how many blue stars came attached to his name. I prefer the qb earn his team and his fans’ confidence and respect with his play on the field. Coming in to last night, there wasn’t much to go on because of our offensive game plans and the fact that we had played home games (Rice was a home game) against inferior opponents. But last night he went a long way in winning me over. I was really impressed. His arm strength and accuracy were fantastic and when he misses he misses in the right places. “3 Int’s” in his stat line couldn’t be more deceiving. More importantly, he looked confident and in charge of his team. That was the one factor that i have been most concerned about. Skills are great and necessary, but as McCoy showed, they are not everything. He was undersized and had average arm strength but made up for it in so many other facets. And i disagree with anyone (including Greg Davis) who thinks he lost confidence after those picks. He realized the “flukey” nature of those just like he should and seemed to get more defiant following the picks and I love that. As for the running game, we just don’t have the personnel to do what we want to. We are trying to transition the game plan and now we are going to have to wait for the types of players we are recruiting to catch up. PB has said a number of times that this is gonna be a damn good football team next year and the year after. And for me, GG went a long way towards cementing that statement last night.
p.s. Mark Richt is going to be fired at the end of this year and yes, I fear the worst.
GD absolutely killed me last night
just asinine play-calling
When hasn't it?
Its been a few years now since I heard kudos to Davis, which he deserved for the play calling in that 22- play touchdown scoring drive. That play-action on 3rd and goal was an excellent call.
Great write-up Peter
I notice an obvious improvement. They finally can scored on the 1st quarter. No more “slow start” . But our OL need to improve. If Tech can block down the pass and get the interception. We can do that from our OL as well. The receivers core need to build up more chemistry with GG(hope they’ll grow as season forward) Stop dropping the pass from him.
OT: So excited about the UCLA game. We haven’t play against UCLA since 98. I can’t believe it was that long ago. We had back to back lost to them on 97 and 98. Oh my I still can’t forget that humiliation experience on 97. We lost to them (3-66). Was that the worst lost we had in school history? I dunno but it’s our payback time next week.
RB's
I’m sick of everyone talking crap after games about the running game. We get it. Texas can’t be predictable when they run the ball. Texas can’t run the ball when teams stack the box and its 3rd and 2 or 4th and 1. Texas can run the ball when the other team doesn’t expect it.
The problem I see
is that we struggle to run the ball out of our base 11 personnel whether we’re in the gun or under center against nickel defenses. When in this formation we have 6 blockers for 6 defenders in the box. We should be able to run more effectively against that front.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:36 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Is there anyone out there that didn't know we were running the ball
with CJ to left side on 3rd and 2 on the 1st drive of the game. If I can look to my father and tell him what’s coming don’t you think the MLB can tell his comrades where the play is going as well?
Later in the game, another 3rd and 2 we’re in the shotgun with Fozzy in the backfield and once again I look to my father and tell him “draw play.” I was right and Fozzy was stopped short and fumbled on the play. I hate our playcalling! I hate that we think we can do what we want, when we want, cause we’re Texas.
I would love next time we have a 3rd and 2 to see a direct snap to Fozzy with Gilbert lined up at wide receiver or even on the sideline for the play. Get creative! Alabama used that play calling for an entire series last year in the game with Auburn. Direct snap to Ingram, run to the left. Direct snap, run to the right.
With this playcalling and inability to open up running lanes, we are looking at a two or three loss season.
Sports is man's joke on God, You see, God says to man, 'I've created a universe where it seems like everything matters, where you'll have to grapple with life and death and in the end you'll die anyway, and it won't really matter.' So man says to God, 'Oh, yeah? Within your universe we're going to create a sub-universe called sports, one that absolutely doesn't matter, and we'll follow everything that happens in it as if it were life and death.'" - Sam Kellerman
by 2Cor12:9 on Sep 19, 2010 10:22 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Lord
I meant to write in the review about the Jumbo package. Holy hell that was frustrating.
You ain't hurt...
Peter, how do you like Austin
since you’ve moved back here? It’s been awhile to get touch with you. How’s your new marriage life? Everything’s good at your end?
Feels amazing to be home
After seven years away, it’s damn great to be back. Couldn’t be happier with things. Thanks for asking.
You ain't hurt...
Peter, glad to know you enjoy everything so far :)
Got a question, do you know if I can find a way to change my profile name. Last night, I got a brother here called me a copycat because my name is so close to him. His name is 98horn. He joined this blog on 4/17/08 and i joined 4/26/08. The difference is I’ve posted more comments than him..haha.
Anyway, let me know if you can help. Appreciated.
I changed my user name last year
I think I emailed the powers that be at SBNation itself, and they took care of it pretty quickly for me.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh you did? Why did you change it?
Did someone call you copycat like someone did to me last night? Anyway, thanks for the heads up :)
Long time ago, Peter helped me on the log in issue and he take care of it right away. That’s why I wonder if he can do the same magic for me..haha
I changed...
…because I was originally posting under a generic user name using my initials and lucky number before I stumbled across a user name which was more identifiably unique for me.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Change is for quitters
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions
And coffee is for closers?
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 20, 2010 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions
agree
I did the same thing. I do the same thing when the Cowboys play. I was wrong when they passed it for the TD on the 1 yard line though. I thought for sure they would run it!
by Longhorns84 on Sep 19, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
I saw plenty of creativity
We tried to run several misdirection plays. Some worked well (Monroe jet sweep) others not so well. Your correct on the predictability of running left. I’d encourage you to go back and watch our runs to the right during the first three games. I’d be willing to be we haven’t had more than a couple runs go for more than two yards in that direction.
by aaronlybrand on Sep 19, 2010 4:42 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Our inability to run the ball confounds me to no end
I watched Duke DUKE move the ball on the ground pretty well against ’Bama’s defense (100 first half yards!). The Duke O-Line was creating holes against that all-american defense. We can’t get 2 yards on a jumbo package against Tech? It’s so clearly coaching, and it’s maddening.
i think every texas fan is baffled to no end with the running game
i have watch tons of football teams run the ball with succes the last 3 weeks now with lesser talent PB whats up with dj monroe, comes in for one play, good gain and thats it.
Not to mention AFA against OU yesterday – 400+ rushing yards. I know AFA runs that funky scheme, but com’on you know its coming. Made me optimistic about facing OU defense in a couple of weeks.
Air Force has a scheme that forces the defense to account for 6 skill players on offense
texas’ scheme forces you to account for only 5
if Gilbert is used more in the run game, even if it is just scrambling on broken plays, that would change
Jumbo package
Some of the play calling, and tipped passes.
The jumbo package was terrible. The play calling was actually better than I thought, with some extremely disappointing exceptions, and you could tell Gilbert is a true soph when he allows them to tip a pass at the line of scrimmage while only rushing 2.
Offense has to get better than this right?
The D was absolutely stellar. even after losing those turnovers when the momentum swings and their O is inspired and pumped, we responded. In the middle of the 4th they had <110 yards of offense. Awesome.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
Great D, and Davis O
With no Colt and no Vince to overcome schemes and play calling, we will go as far as Davis can take us..or IOW as far as our offensive players can take us by overcoming the flawed offensive coaching they receive.
I do appreciate the positives, but after seeing how Davis called this game, my hopes for this year have plummeted.
Check Nebraska on the USA Today Coaches
It’s setting up as a showdown between two voters :)
Peter your analysis is excellent
I get the point in spades about the evolution of the Texas Defense under Muschamp. We are still working under Vince’s shadow and Colt’s as well with the offense. Our defense is gonna win us some games this year… just like last night. The offense just needs to keep improving, run blocking especially. But remember the old adage, “Defense win Championships”… Cause its true.
Play like you mean it...
Gotta go back and watch the game again. But I think GG made alot of mistakes that he really shouldnt be making.
I lost half my voice yelling at the playcalling.
The other half at GG to just throw it away.
There were more than a few plays where he held on to the ball waaaayy to long.
Be smart throw it away. No use in holding on to it for an extended amount of time and taking a sack.
GC has to learn...
…that if he doesn’t see anything he either has to hit a lane and try to run (if it’s open) or throw it away. Waiting forever and then running into a sack just won’t get it done.
First half clock management
Peter,
I didn’t see any comment on Brown’s clock management near the end of the first half. As it worked out, it was a good thing he didn’t call a TO with Tech backed up and about 3 minutes left. But either Brown was a genius who knew the Horns wounldn’t be able to move the ball and would have to give it back, or he made a mistake and got really lucky. Is it that he has no confidence in Gilbert’s running the 2-minute drill?
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
Already posted about it in the other thread
But the clock management was perfect. The commentators were just being clueless, as usual. Had the offense clicked into gear, we had enough time on the clock, enough timeouts, and the ability to stop the clock when necessary, to score. If the offense didn’t click into gear (which it didn’t), then had we called the timeouts early, Tech would have gotten the ball back with a TON of time left and could have easily stolen a FG.
I actually disagree
We should have used a timeout before the punt. I understand why Mack did what he did, but I think it was playing too scared. What it did was restrict the playbook a little bit more. The fact that it happened to work out for us because we went backwards doesn’t mean that the decision was the smartest one.
It wasn’t a big deal, but you want to give your offense time because when you have the ball, you can control the clock and not the defense. That’s even more true since Tech had no timeouts.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 19, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions
I preferred a time out...
…but I was definitely in the “no big deal” camp for the reasons cited above. The decision could have gone either way and didn’t merit the amount of condemnation of the decision from Franklin and Cunningham.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 19, 2010 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Mike Davis was good once again, and continued to impress with the skills he possesses.
He was alright yesterday. I’m pretty sure he led the team in dropped passes.
by goingforthecorner on Sep 19, 2010 2:17 PM CDT reply actions
I can't believe Boomcoat is a freshman
Texas shouldn’t be allowed to have him play football for two more years. Fortunately, he has to :-)
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
I was very happy with the way the game turned out.
Gilbert and the running game started off great, we were on the verge of going up 21-0 (could have been the “moment” for Gilbert) and then a Tech lineman makes a great play a long with Brit Mitchell not cutting his man down and the ball bounced the wrong way. And then another tipped ball is intercepted and returned and you could tell that Gilbert was just not as confident as he was prior to those two events.
You feel he is close, and once he gets it things will be great!
Hook 'em
Congrats on the win BON.
While it was frustrating on both sides of the ball, you came out on top.
" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...
I was hoping you'd post.
I just want to say how relieved I was to learn you don’t have to defend Tech for four downs anymore. The pirate moxie has walked the plank.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 19, 2010 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions
That was a hard game to stomach offensively.
Yes, Leach is soooo gone. It’s hard to watch. I honestly feel he would have capitalized on the turnovers and this would have been a lot closer. I did have the pleasure of watching the game with some damn good company. Former Tech players under Leach came over and we had a good time, aside from the loss.
On a serious note, is Texas’ offense playing that bad, or is Tech’s defense playing that good?
I’m having a hard time with it. I know we were shut down on numerous occasions after Muschamp adjusted. Our OC Brown, however, never seemed to adjust to what the defense was giving us. If you’ll notice, we don’t look like we did last year. The only guy calling the plays is our OC. No more checking down and making a play. The fast tempo they had hoped for was nowhere to be seen last night. I HATE the speed rush. F*** me to tears I hate the speed rush.
Other things I’m not fond of with Texas right now. Jeffcoat. Damn that guy. Vacarro. Damn him too, although he seemed rather quiet last night. Damn your secondary. Screw it, damn your defense!!
Great game guys and gals, it was a battle.
" Answers --Become Resources."
Without Questions, There are limited Resources...
Maybe a dumb question
I assume the Horns caught a plane back to Austin immediately after the game Saturday night? Do they fly commercial (SW, etc.) or do they charter? Is it always the same?
I realize this is random, but my buddies and I were staying at the Holliday Inn in Lubbock (where the team was) and we got into this debate about whether the team left for Austin Saturday vs. stayed until Sunday, and either way, how they traveled.
Gracias

by 






























