Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

We Have Issues: Texas Longhorns Week 3

LUBBOCK TX - SEPTEMBER 18:  Running back Foswhitt Whittaker #28 of the Texas Longhorns runs the ball past Cody Davis #16 of the Texas Tech Red Raiders at Jones AT&T Stadium on September 18 2010 in Lubbock Texas.  (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

 

There were some big steps forward and a few steps back against Texas Tech. It was a sloppy game, but a win nonetheless.

The night belonged to the Texas defense. We found out more about the four key issues that are defining this team. One is a bigger of a concern as ever. Another is way ahead of schedule and was completely dominating against the Red Raiders.

Let's get into this week...

Garrett Gilbert's Progress 

By the end of the season most people won't remember that two of Gilbert's three interceptions were not his fault. He didn't show much progress from last week, but he did seem more decisive. The crowd and the bass boat paint job on the Tech helmets didn't seem to distract him too much, although he had some visible signs of frustration.

The tipped passes we saw in the National Championship Game resurfaced Saturday night. One was just a good play by the Tech defensive lineman, but this issue seems to stem from two places: Gilbert's stance getting too wide, thereby making him dip before he throws; and locking onto a receiver for too long and telegraphing his pass.

His play-action fakes still need some work, but he does do a great job of whipping around and getting his eyes downfield. Speaking of the play-action pass, last I checked, it's supposed to be set up by the run. Seemed to be the other way around Saturday. Why fake the run when there's no threat of the run?

In a close, sloppy game, the young QB kept his head and hit some key passes. But yet again he was unable to sustain a solid rhythm. He gets another warm-up against a struggling UCLA team next week before the biggest tests of the season come against The Land Thieves and those huskers of corn.

Retooling the Running Game

GhostofBigRoy has a detailed, inside-the-numbers look at the game, and in it he notes the 2.2 yards per carry that just leaves a sick feeling in your stomach. It wasn't that long ago when the Tech game rolled around on the schedule and you could easily pin a 200-plus-yard rushing performance. This thing is a looooong way from being threatening to opposing defenses.

Star-divide

At this point, it's safe to say that this running game is worse than last year's. Aside from a lot of single-back sets from under center, there's no measurable improvement. After three games last season, Texas had 525 total rushing yards. This year: 458. The average yards per rush this year is at 4.1 compared to 4.2 last year.

The problem starts with the offensive line, who keeps crumbling instead of getting good push. The holes and running lanes just aren't forming enough. And the defensive lines aren't going to get much easier.

To be fair, it's going to take a lot more than three games for this thing to gain momentum. But what we're trying to do here is examine progress. From what we've seen in the first three weeks, this area of concern gets a solid C. The few bright spots have been Cody Johnson's solid runs early in the Rice game and Fozzy Whittaker's long, strong touchdown run against Wyoming. Tre' Newton has looked quick at times, but his inability to stay on his feet after contact is a momentum killer.

Is it Traylon Shead time yet?

BROC (Big Receiver on Campus)

For the third week in a row, we had a new leader in receiving yards. This week it was senior James Kirkendoll with six catches for 122 yards. He had some terrific grabs but has also disappeared at times this season.

John Chiles was out and freshman Mike Davis got the start. Davis had 45 yards and one touchdown. Marques Goodwin continued to struggle and has been dealing with nagging injuries. Malcolm Williams is always good for a big-time drop, and he certainly had one Saturday that ended up being intercepted. He has the talent to be The Guy, but his inconsistency keeps him being just a guy.

Finding a go-to receiver has proven as elusive as finding a starting running back. But this issue isn't as pressing as the running game. This team may not need a No. 1 receiver to grow in experience and confidence. But young quarterbacks progress better when they have the confidence in a reliable target.

The D-Line Shuffle

Wow, this group was phenomenal! Eddie Jones was a beast. It's so cool to see this guy playing so well in his senior season. He's been through numerous injuries and surgeries through his career, and has never really played at full strength until now. He came in as a five-star recruit and is living up to it so far this year. Jones had two sacks and five tackles against the Red Raiders.

Jackson Jeffcoat can pretty much be considered a starter. He's getting more and more playing time. He had two tackles and a big fumble recovery from Tech's errant shotgun snap to start the game.

The D-line got all four sacks in the game and was huge in allowing Tech just one touchdown and 144 yards of offense. Big, BIG progress for what was one of the top concerns at the beginning of the season. The ability of the younger players (mainly the ends) to step up and show their diversity has eased the concerns over the lack of depth for the D-line.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As long as Muschamp is there your DL is going to be very good.

Without a running game, teams are going to tee off on Gilbert. The real question is, does the Big 12 contain any defenses outside of NU capable of doing that? I think the conference is obviously down this year. Will be interesting to see who takes advantage.

by miketag on Sep 19, 2010 11:44 PM CDT reply actions  

I think it may be a down year for college football, except for Ohio State, Alabama, and Bosie.

It just seems outside of those three teams no one is really dominating but it is still early in the season.

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Add Oregon and Nebraska to that list, they've both impressed

If we could run one game without having a bunch of goofs on offense, we would belong in that list too.

by notsofst on Sep 20, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nebraska and Oregon

Nebraska besides Washington (who is 1 and 2) has not payed anybody. I’ll give a little credit for Oregon whooping up on Tennessee (who is also 1 and 2).

Nebraska’s next opponent is South Dakota State (no contest there). Oregon has a decent opponent in Arizona State.

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think you're giving them enough credit.

Granted, neither have faced stiff competition, but not many teams have this early in the year ( cough Boise State cough ).

Both Oregon and Nebraska have shown some real spark on offense, and Nebraska we know is also sporting a tough defense. There’s no reason either of those teams shouldn’t be in the discussion.

by notsofst on Sep 20, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

I do agree they've shown some spark on O...

but lets wait and see how they fare against some quality opponents before we make judgments.

I think there is a lot of parity this year in college football leaving only a small few at the top. At least that is what I’ve seen so far.

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gilbert seems to be a lot more confident while passing

when he isn’t coming out of a run fake. I think it is partly because it is naturally more difficult (you have to spend a split second looking away from the coverage), but it also seems like every PA pass is a straight drop back. I can hardly remember any rollouts, which would let Gilbert use his athleticism, get him away from the rush, create a nice rhythm, and make the opposing DE’s play a little safer, which would go a long way towards opening the running game, which needs all the help it can get.

I also think we aren’t properly utilizing draw plays. The team is clearly more competent at passing than rushing, the the defense knows this as well. Since that is what the identity is, play off of that and run draws. The shotgun runs have been infuriatingly inefficient for over 2 years now (ever since JC left), and switching to more draws would keep the o-line from trying to do something they can’t (run block) and would play to the strength (field vision) of two of our top backs (Fozzy and Tre).

If Cojo isn’t reduced to jumbo package after the Tech game, then we have to start seriously questioning the analytical capabilities of the coaching staff. In the 4th quarter, the line actually was getting a solid push up front, and Cojo repeatedly kept falling into the pile of bodies in front of him, when a single cut would’ve given him an open field. Simply put, he is not a good running back. Too much lumbering, terrible footwork, and no field vision at all; he just trusts in his ability to barrel over people, so he slams into the line over and over again for 1 yard gains.

Having Boomcoat-Acho-Jones up front (and whoever feels like coming in for the 4th spot) almost seems unfair. The linebackers barely have to think about stopping the run. The more I watch the defense, the more I think that even whatever weakness you want to find in it are in the right places. The experience of the secondary is such a benefit, and really helps when whatever few mental lapses there are do pop up, and the youth up front is mostly neutralized by the sheer athleticism of the group.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Sep 20, 2010 12:25 AM CDT reply actions  

roll out

the TD to M. Davis was a sprint out to the right side. I don’t think they wanted to roll Gilbert out of the pocket bc of the trouble we were having with Smith (tech’s DE) who was extremely athletic and would have chased Gilbert down.

by BMG on Sep 20, 2010 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just got back from Lubbock 4 hours ago and

I was embarrassed to call that gaggle of slow, weak men an offensive line at the stadium. Our running game is the worst its been in a while. I love Fozzy, but I swear you could put Eddie Jones and Sam Acho on the O-Line and we would get more YPC than we did the last 3 games.

Also, the fact that Tre Newton gets any carries at tailback infuriates me… he adds nothing to our offense.

Paging Shead and Hills….

"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"

by greenspointexas on Sep 20, 2010 12:26 AM CDT reply actions  

BTW, other than that, I am extremely happy about the win. Our defense played lights out

After we sealed the game with the 4th quarter TD pass, I turned to my fiance and said in a rather loud manner, “Lets rush the field!”

I was met with 3 STFU’s and boos from the entire section. I just laughed and said “Scoreboard”

Aside – My brother went to Tech and was a student there 2 years ago. I went to the game with him and sat in the student section because he got me a free ticket (student ID). I wore neutral colors and had the experience of watching him and 20,000 other Tech students rush the field while I sat in the stands waiting for him to gimme a ride back to his apartment. To this day, it was the worst sporting experience of my life, so naturally, I thoroughly enjoyed this win

"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"

by greenspointexas on Sep 20, 2010 12:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

and for my final burn

does it bother anyone else that when GG doesnt find an open receiver after 1.2 seconds that he scrambles right into oncoming pressure? hes done this about 6-7 times over the past 2 games

"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"

by greenspointexas on Sep 20, 2010 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, how dare he...

he scrambles right into pressure created by a blown blocking assignment, what’s wrong with the kid! c’mon GG you are better than that! ;-)

by longhornJ on Sep 20, 2010 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good point on the play-actions fakes

At the time I remember thinking that’s not fooling anyone and is just a waste of time and motion.

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Sep 20, 2010 8:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Interesting point of the rushing yards...

being even lower than last year. I wonder how much of that was the rushing contributions of McCoy. Thus far, it seems Gilbert can’t, won’t, or is not allowed to run.

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Sep 20, 2010 8:14 AM CDT reply actions  

was thinking the same thing

I bet that if you took out Colt’s running, the YPC is about the same year-over-year.

by BMG on Sep 20, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Traylon Shead

Oh yeah. It’s time.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Sep 20, 2010 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

I think its an oline issue...

Anyway, I read that Mack said he would remove the redshirt off Hills before taking the redshirt off Traylon Shead. So, he’s still pretty far down on the depth chart.

by cj43 on Sep 20, 2010 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

not to mention

the only way Shead or Whaley see the field is if they show they can blitz protect in practice. There is no way you put either of these two in against OU and NU – they would be a liability.

Another thing to keep in mind is that while the RBs aren’t picking up many yards, they are taking care of the football. When you have an offense that capitalizes on fewer opportunities like ours, the last thing you want is a turnover. I’m more comfortable working through our O-line and playcalling issues with the guys we have, instead of asking an inexperienced player to work wonders against the top 2 defenses we will face in the regular season.

by BMG on Sep 20, 2010 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

You guys are right, of course

It’s just so frustrating watching this mess, you want some kind of change.

Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by Caradoc on Sep 20, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

release?

i hate to bring up possible negatives, but does Gilbert have a windup instead of a quick release? it seems like it takes forever to get the ball out of there.
we knew there would be growing pains this year and Tuberville knows how to coach a defense.
our defense will keep us in games this year.

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Sep 20, 2010 8:20 AM CDT reply actions  

I can't believe nobody has metioned.....

our schemes.

Gilbert under center = run.
Gilbert in the shotgun = pass (for the most part).
It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out.

Um….better mix it up GD. I guaratee you opposing defenses (ahem, OU & Neb) are salivating.

Our defense will keep us in every game. Our offense better pick it up and get up to speed. I don’t necessarily see Gilbert as our main problem on offense – I think the receivers need to get better at seeing the ball and catching the ball.

by Go Bevo on Sep 20, 2010 9:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Schemes are terrible

I think we have 3-4 rushing plays in our playbook. My favorite is when you run square into a pile of lineman for no gain. That of course is followed closely by the goal line package. I mean who are they kidding? We couldnt blow a group of 8th grade defensive lineman off ths ball. It’s truly frustrating to watch.

I don’t know who is hated more among Longhorn fans in Dallas right now – Jason Garrett or Greg Davis. Luckily I’m a Texans fan and finally have something to cheer about in that department.

by Horns82 on Sep 20, 2010 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Standing Ovation from me for the D wow

QB is young and shaky but he’s definately my guy, he wins and I like him. WRs are fantastic when they get a good ball. OL is shaky and we are paying the price for trying to get Colt the Heisman, they must get mean and nastier. Can I get a FB to block? Can I get a look at Traylon Shead or Chris Whaley in there coach? If we can find a run this team has a chance with the big time D. Time to give more pups an opportunity I think before OU. What I have seen so far wont beat OU because they can shut this team down and run the ball. We simply must find a consistent run game, but I do know CJ and FW arent it.

by sam0807 on Sep 20, 2010 10:06 AM CDT reply actions  

From what I've heard is that OU has a young secondary...

I think OU and Texas are close to even. Maybe giving OU a slight edge due to a proven RB (Murray) and WR (Broyles). Jones looked terrible against AFA and OU’s D was struggling at times against players who are 30lbs lighter. The triple option can cause issues but OU said they have been working on that since beginning of camp and the OU D still could not stop it even though they knew it was coming. From what I saw was a QB frustrated and making poor throws and decisions because of that frustration.

  

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Several issues

First, OU did not say they had been working on it since the beginning of camp. What they actually said was that they did work on it “a little bit” during camp just to familiarize themselves with it, but you make it out to sound like they’ve been game planning AFA for a month or something. Even with as stout as your D has proven to be, I’d venture to guess the cadets would have given you guys some trouble as well. I mean they hurt us up the middle and if I’m not mistaken that’s where you’re the weakest as well.

Second, Jones didn’t “look terrible against AFA.” We all know your famous “stats are for losers” quote, but let’s just look for fun.

Jones – 26/42 254 1-0
Gilbert – 21/36 227 2-3

I’m not even going to address the obvious issue and the end of those stat lines as I’ve already read here how great Gilbert played and how none of the INTS were his fault. I’m just saying you might need to re-evaluate your defintion of terrible.

Now if you want to say we should be terribly worried about matching up with your secondary and/or Jeffcoat coming off the edge then I could probably get on board with that definition of terrible.

"Ronnell is a freak of nature. Anybody that big, powerful and fast shouldn't be allowed on the field. That's Ronnell. You saw in the Kansas game when he knocked that guy out, he changed the whole game."

by Jordan Esco on Sep 20, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not the only one who thought that...

The announcers were agreeing with me that he looked frustrated and was making poor decisions. Sorry if I made it seem like yall were scheming for the entire month before opening day in prep for AFA…I’m sure that was not the case.

Jones had an off day…second of the year. Take the blinders off.

Its funny how you harp on the negatives that I mention about OU when I actually said “OU a slight edge due to a proven RB (Murray) and WR (Broyles).”

This is from the examiner “Landry Jones, who struggled with accuracy much of the game, threw three incompletions on the next drive, the third on a 4th-and-8 to give Air Force the ball back.”

Link

Granted our QB did not have a great night but at least I admit it.

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh no, I agree

Not that I would expect you to read our site or listen to our podcast, but I was one of few that were very critical of Landry. I just wouldn’t qualify it as terrible like you did, but make no mistake he will have to improve significantly for me to feel confident about our offense getting more than 14-17 points against you guys in two weeks.

"Ronnell is a freak of nature. Anybody that big, powerful and fast shouldn't be allowed on the field. That's Ronnell. You saw in the Kansas game when he knocked that guy out, he changed the whole game."

by Jordan Esco on Sep 20, 2010 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Landry can be a little of Jekyll and Hyde sometimes I agree

We definitely want to see him be more consistent, but even on a night he struggled 26/42 is about 62%. Not terrible and he didn’t turn the ball over. Now if he can do that against quality defenses (aka Texas & NU in the CCG….hopefully) that would be a major step forward. He does tend to go Broyles or broke at times too, however he’s starting to develop some chemistry/trust with the FR Stills (3rd down throw for a 1st down to seal the victory). I see the same thing happening with GG and Davis as well. Davis has a knack for getting open and looks promising for UT. I don’t know what’s happening with Goodwin as I expected him to be the playmaker this year. Williams is a pretty good volley ball player :-)

by soonerspeak on Sep 20, 2010 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mean and Nasty?

How about competent and blocking? Too many missed assignments. Bad technique. No timing. Standing around.

by Eskimohorn on Sep 20, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd put the tipped passes on Mitchell's inability to cut Scott Smith

GG needs to not dip his throws, but the cut blocks would have helped. I know the Texas OL can’t practice cut blocks because it might injure one the DLs, but hell get some scout team walk ons to practice cut blocks against.

I’ve said it until I am blue in the face; Texas needs to play Roberson at fullback to help get the running game rolling. If Roberson is leading blocking, he pops the first defender to come through the hole instead of our RBs fighting for 2 yards after first contact at the LOS. God forbid we get out of at least a 3 WR set Greg! Roberson lead blocking does more for us out there than one of the wide receivers deciding not to block or volleyball setting a pass.

I think Shead will play against UCLA. Newton likely has a concussion, given his history and watching the play on which Tre was injured; it’s illogical to think otherwise. Mcgee is done, Jeremy Hills badly wants a redshirt, Shead is our third running back until Newton is healthy.

I think Fozzy at TB and Roberson at FB can be a possible solution in the running game. We’re not going to run very effectively against Gooner and Huskers, but maybe we scratch out a couple good runs that set up play action.

Where the hell is the H-back? Has not even been attempted in a game yet.

McWhorter’s recruiting prowess is keeping this guy employed right now. I really hope Mack and Mac had a Come to Jesus talk on Sunday. Mac is running out of chances. I thought after his son graduated, and was no longer on the team McWhorter would retire/resign. Another dream shattered. Most people are asked to leave their jobs after 3 years of not performing. If only we all had Mack Brown staff like job security.

I think Mike Davis is still our best receiver even after Tech. His 2 drops were passes behind or near the LOS, so he didn’t have much business catching them anyway.

Greg needs to Goodwin another chance downfield.

I have never liked how we’ve used Malcolm Williams. Where are the jump balls in the end zone, deep posts and fades? Malcolm can really block. The volleyball sets need to stop though. I’ve seen Malcolm get his mojo and focus going after he catches a long pass. Much like a great scorer in basketball hitting a couple free throws and then going on a tear. Malcolm needs the warm up.

The defense has no issues other than Chykie Brown. Are we resigned to Chykie giving up one big play a game? Chykie looked lost on the Leong touchdown.

A win is a win in Lubbock, Mack certainly understands that, but the salt and peppered one also gets that big time offensive adjustments need to be made.

by billfromlaketravis on Sep 20, 2010 10:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Oline tape

Every offensive linemen on the team needs to watch 4th and 5 and focus on Justin Blalock. Maybe they will learn “Hey, it is ok to knock my man back and on the ground with authority.”

by JohnsonUT on Sep 20, 2010 10:42 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree with Bill

God grant us a FB, HB and an OC who can come up with at least 2 or 3 plays for each set Run/Pass. I know the TBs can run.

Please GD stop with the 3 WR 1 RB sets that yield 2 yd rushing and stop telegraphing run/pass with shotgun and under center.

When WM takes over, its time for Mac and GD to exit finally.

Lastly the team needs to get tougher and pound some folks like I know they can, and its a good time to start with UCLA who embarrassed this team years ago.

by sam0807 on Sep 20, 2010 10:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Amen brother!

Here’s my solution: Alums prevail upon Deloss Dodds to retire. Elevate Muschamp to Head Coach. Send Greg Davis to Sri Lanka or Bulgaria or somwhere that he cannot ruin another football team. Heck, I’m not sure I wouldn’t do all of the above, then hire Mike Leach to serve as OC. Lweach/Muschamp might be a very cool combo. Of course, Mike might offend someone’s tender feelings.

by B.P. WOMANCATCHER on Sep 21, 2010 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

what I see

It’s only a matter of time before GG has a breakout game, maybe UCLA or OU. The defensive can keep the game in hand until the offense puts the game away. The running game isn’t necessarily from o-line blocking but from the RBs taking the play to often from the designed hole that isn’t there instead of seeing the alternate running lanes. I remember atleast one running play against tech where the RB runs into the pile instead of cutting left or right around it.

Nice punt fake from theiir own 30 yard line and guts from Mack to take the game by it’s throat.

There might be a game this season where the defense is off and will need the offense to bail them out. Hopefully not at K-state. (knock on wood)

by Ryan2907 on Sep 20, 2010 10:50 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

GG this year

I think we all just need to brace ourselves for some good things and bad things from Gilbert. He’s young and hasn’t had that many real snaps in real college football games. By the end of the season if he’s not responding to his mistakes…then we might have issues. Get ready for an all out blitz every play by every team we play for now on. We’ve demonstrated that the “new” knock em in the mouth running….is not happening this season. Gilbert better learn to get rid of the ball quick.

by Dawnpatrol on Sep 20, 2010 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

The footbaws

I heart Mike Davis, Jackson Jeffcoat, Dos Achos, Eddie Jones, and still Garrett Gilbert. Despite the lackluster offense, GG worries me none with the possible exception of some timing issues.

Kirkendoll, where the hell have you been? Will you be staying long? Let us know K thx bye.

Old Malcolm Williams, please send for new Malcolm Williams, the one that catches stuff.

Not sure the running game is going to happen this year, and I plan to waste little time losing sleep over it. CoJo is undoubtedly situational and should not be used for versatility. Fozzy… I want so badly to stay behind him, but a swift gust (or maybe just Scott Smith) seems to knock him over, or the ball from his hands. Tre may need to be the guy, but there are no peak strengths with him; merely good all over.

Blake Gideon, I’m still okay with you targeting if that’s what you need to do. But will this be a weekly thing? Just keep us posted so we can account for the penalties ahead of time.

Some pretty shoddy clock mgmt at the close of the half. But 40 mins of possession always a good thing, regardless how ugly it was to watch.

I will steer clear of the GD hate train. I think McWhorter has one going though.

by Infield Elephant on Sep 20, 2010 11:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Quick Reminder

Texas A&M is still undefeated. You had problems beating a lowly Texas Tech team, if I were Mack Brown I would be worried because tu hasn’t played the big boys yet.

by YUMC on Sep 20, 2010 11:43 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

aTm really stunk it up this weekend and has played nobody.

Wins over SFA, LA Tech, and barely winning against FIU is not a good start. This talk is a little premature.

ATX

by Atownatx on Sep 20, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

aTm required a giant 4th quarter to come back and beat FIU at home

GTFO

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Sep 20, 2010 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Is it just me

or does this Aggie need a tox screening. Flushed face and dilated pupils. Maybe one too many trips to the cow pasture harvesting mushrooms?

by soonerspeak on Sep 21, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know,

I just assumed he was with a sheep and that was his O face. But I wouldn’t rule out the mushrooms.

Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.

by LonghornEm on Sep 22, 2010 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

This will be my new standard response to YUMC.

Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma

by pleaseplaykindle on Sep 20, 2010 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dude, seriously, go contribute to the A&M blog

There’s like just two guys over there talking to each other. Help your fellow Ags out, don’t waste your time here.

In-VINCE-able.

by iamjackburton on Sep 20, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Aggie fan

I guess you guys are so bad now…that the only time you could beat us is the Year we are rebuilding after playing for a NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP! One game at a time old boy.

by Dawnpatrol on Sep 20, 2010 1:49 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

huh?

Ok, well, it seems as if I am the only one that was almost completely satisfied with this win…

Gilbert was great the whole game, minus the couple times the ball should have been thrown away, but that will come, its only his third start and hes a true soph. I dont put any blame on him for the int’s. Smith should have been cut down, G-Money was just doing what he was supposed to. (can’t get on GG at all in my eyes, this kids going to be ridiculously good, hes still young.)

Now, the offensive line wasn’t perfect, but really? do you really expect any offensive line to be perfect every weekend? they gave up three sacks, but for the most part, was giving G-Money plenty of time.

defense was incredible… period

The only thing that i’m somewhat confused about is the run game. I dont think it is really as bad as everyone wants to make it out to be… well… ok its been bad, but the thing i dont understand…. All off-season we have been hearing about this “new invention” called the h-back… I am kind of thinking that we are holding that back… Waiting for a later part in the season to blow that out…(OU? NU?) if you remember the first TD by Fuzzy against tech… we had that mysterious thing called an H back in…and it worked.. it blew open a hole for Fuzzy and we were up 7-0… but I didn’t see it very much the rest of the game… not at all really… this makes me wonder if we really have shown all of our cards… I think we need to be patient… Mack isn’t dumb, and everyone can hate me for this, but neither is GD…. I think we have a lot more in our bag…give it time
Hook em

by Jordening3 on Sep 20, 2010 2:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Wishful thinking. We're not holding anything back

If you aren’t bringing it out against the hated Tech, you don’t have it, period.

In-VINCE-able.

by iamjackburton on Sep 20, 2010 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't hate GD, per se

And I think most of us want GD as our OC. However with that said, GD seriously must have some lapses in judgement at times. For example:

…why is it that other teams can run a screen pass/hitch SUCCESSFULLY (positive yards) and yet EVERY SINGLE TIME Texas runs it, the defense is in the receivers face at the same time as the ball?!? Think about all of our screen passes over the years……the success rate for Texas is monumentally small.

…..as I said up above previously…. Gilbert under center = run; Gilbert in shotgun = pass. Better mix it up GD.

…..running plays take way too long to develop. By the time the back gets the ball, the d-line is in the backfield.

If Mack/GD are “holding back” and the Horns offense can suddenly “turn it on” against superior teams, then I’ll never, ever say anything negative about GD again.

by Go Bevo on Sep 20, 2010 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

well said

go bevo i agree with your assessment of the G-money under center = run, shotgun = pass that is definately something they need to fix. i guess the way i look at it, i understand Lubcock is a difficult place to play, but i dont really know, even in a down year, if i thought texas would have problems there… Tech isn’t nearly as good as they have been… maybe its wishful thinking but maybe Mack and GD saw and realized on those first two drives that this wasn’t the Tech teams of old..

also go bevo i think the reason we can’t run those plays is because we have tended to rely on those far too much… that is something any team we play is going to be looking for… as for taking to long for running plays to develop.. that is going to happen when your focusing on misdirection…but at the same time, teams will catch on to that and we need to switch that up as well..

all in all, i do not think we have showed everything we have…i think it will come out against ou and nu… i truley believe we still have the H back in our magical top hat.. i hope i’m not wrong..because if i am, we wont win in dallas and may get handled in nebraska… but i just dont think we have heard, or seen the last of that magical h-back

one thing is for sure… we need to be ready for nebraska… that game scares me more than any other game. I live in nebraska, and i am the lone longhorns fan, in a family of die hard nebraska fans… i’m not sure if everyone knows this…but nebraska HATES texas… they dont just dislike them, they HATE texas…and they will be out of their minds for that game…especially after we “cheated” in the Big XII championship game last year…
Be careful in Lubcock? naaaa
watch out for nebraska

by Jordening3 on Sep 21, 2010 9:04 AM CDT reply actions  

Nebraska fans hate Texas...take a number

Doesn’t everybody we play hate us…Texas is the big emotional adrenaline-pumped game on everyone else’s schedule that they start talking about in camp. As they say, its lonely at the top.

by DavidB64 on Sep 21, 2010 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

well said all

Consensus is we all think GD and the Offense are still holding back. An H Back and FB will appear soon. Ok.

Id set like this and run the ball and find out what we have this Saturday. After we find out we can give GD the keys back to confuse everyone.

WR – Malcom and Mike Davis
TE – who wants to be a star?
HB/FB – who wants to be a star?
TB – Tre Newton/Fozzy/Traylon

by sam0807 on Sep 21, 2010 9:48 AM CDT reply actions  

agreed

that is exactly how i see it…hopefully that is how its going to be…

oh yea does anyone know anything about Blaine Irby?

by Jordening3 on Sep 21, 2010 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn