Coaching Expectations - Texas Edition
"The only thing that disturbs me about my profession is the fact that people give you too much credit when you win - and too much criticism when you lose. I'll be the same person and do the same things and say the same things when we lose. But people won't believe me then. I won't change, but the people will."
-- Darrell K. Royal in the Alcalde, September 1962 edition
Another year, time to cast my eyes to football with my burnt orange pince-nez.
The Big 3:
Mack Brown - Mack Brown may not have changed, but it certainly seems like he's learned a few new tricks. Recruiting has been amazing of late, Texas remains a BCS sweetheart, and he has steered the program into a position where it can essentially declare ownership of its own conference. Oh, and he also has the best winning percentage in UT's history and there doesn't appear to be a slowdown anywhere on the horizon. Even the future OOC scheduling has picked up - though speculation as to whether Mack will still be helming the ship through the later years abounds. There doesn't seem to be a big storyline surrounding mack this year, just another in the renaissance of Texas football and the generally quiet speculation as to when and if he will turn over the scepter to his chosen successor.
Greg Davis - After a national championship, two other BCS victories and an MNC appearance, Greg Davis seems to have rehabilitated his image. Or, at the very least, the lynch mob has temporarily put out their torches. It's not easy to define what exactly, Greg Davis is, largely because longhorns fans don't conceptualize "very good but not great" very well. (As a thought exercise, think about the average longhorn fans opinion of him if Texas were an equally dynamic running team with an equally flawed passing game, and then tell me how many "Greg Davis sucks" cries we would expect to hear from the student section) Arguably the best QB coach in the game, a good architect, but more of a play-caller than offensive strategist, Greg Davis will inevitably be judged by no more than a handful of drives. I don't know when or against whom, but at some point the offense will have to generate points in a hurry and Davis will turn to his one true love - the passing game. The degree to which Davis maximizes talents of various receivers who don't quite fit his offense (i.e. more physically talented than skillful players like Williams and White) and minimizes deficiencies of a young bunch (e.g. as a true sophomore, there are still concerns about Gilbert in the empty set) will largely determine how loud the murmurs get and how many reignite their torches and prepare to storm Belmont.
Will Muschamp - Coach of the future or the next in a long line of UT defensive coordinators who finds work helming a middling BCS program? There isn't much to be said about Will Muschamp's defensive style that hasn't been more adroitly expressed by PB, Ghost, Scipio or the dozens of other great longhorn writers, so I'll address the other ultimate concern - will he stay or will he go? His salary is competitive with the head coaching position at programs like Clemson, West Virginia and Pitt - and with incentives he's not too far off UCLA and Arizona head coaching positions. Let that soak in a minute - a program that wants to hire away Muschamp would have to start at about the same or worse financial leverage with Muschamp as a Chris Peterson (Boise), Mike Rilely (Oregon State), or Kevin Sumlin - with no head coaching resume. Many programs with the money won't be willing to make an investment on a relative unknown. Teams to cheer for will be Georgia (Mark Richt went from OC to HC with no HC resume), LSU (Some institutional familiarity on both sides). Others Longhorn fans should learn to love (temporarily at least) are Michigan (not necessarily because they would hire Muschamp, but because they could easily hire a leading candidate on LSU or Georgia's board who isn't Muschamp) and the dark horse, T. Boone University. (No I haven't lost my mind, T. Boone only has so many years of watching football left, a nearly bottomless checkbook and could see the advantages of hurting an in conference rival while (likely) upgrading over Gundy). If you don't want Muschamp to receive an offer he has to seriously consider before he inherits Mack's office, cheer for the rich.
Key Assistants:
Mike Tolleson - It seems like every year Tolly is expected to pull a 280lb rabbit (Tyrell Higgins is a great name for a Continental Giant) out his metaphorical hat, meanwhile Oscar Giles has freshmen who could start for 80-90 FBS programs. While Tolly is known for producing guys like Roy Miller or Ben Alexander, players who show fine polish late in their careers, this group is young beyond a redshirt sophomore and true junior. The real questions are how fast he can develop players at a position where the physical demands often outweigh the mental, and whether Alex Okafor, noted fan of My Super Sweet 16, was moved to 5 tech because of the outstanding freshmen (Jeffcoat and Wilson) or whether Tolleson called dibs on the the second coming of Lamarr Houston. Or a combination of the two?
Bobby Kennedy - Jordan Shipley is probably the Greg Davis/Bobby Kennedy archtype, a player who can be the roundest of round pegs for the offense. Now Kennedy is faced with trying to sand the edges off a bunch of rhombi before Davis needs them to save a BCS/MNC season. Like Tolleson, Kennedy reliably produces a few upperclassmen surprises (e.g. Nate Jones), so the odds are good that at least one of Chiles, Williams, and Kirkendoll will reach something resembling their full potential is high. Who will make the leap first, a talented but to date underachieving group of upperclassmen or the the most hyped group of young receivers since Big Roy, B.J. Johnson and Sloan Thomas? I'll take Chiles and Mike Davis, and set the over/under at no less than six different starting wideout lineups before the end of Big 12 play.
Mac McWhorter - Often viewed as a contributor to Greg Davis' flaws, McWhorter is commonly viewed as the weak link in the offensive coaching staff. Regardless of your opinion on McWhorter, please take a moment to be thankful that he replaced Tim Nunez, who now coaches offensive line at eHow.com. Rightly or wrongly, there has been a lot of criticism for the failure of Tray Allen to develop into the kind of bookend he was projected to be out of high school, and expect a firestorm of second guessing with the switch of Hix from right to left Tackle. This line may be more physically imposing, but whether it has the wherewithal to avoid mental mistakes and help a young QB avoid being blindsided has yet to be seen - and probably won't be until OU.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
really...
… is there any question that its Major?
by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 2, 2010 5:20 PM CDT reply actions
McWhorter gives him a run for his money tho
"We'll be baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack!"
by greenspointexas on Sep 2, 2010 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Could not agree more
If the O-Line doesn’t perform, no running backs coach in the world could make a difference. Our O-Line has not been a strength of the team for too long, considering the talent we bring in.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Sep 2, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep, it's McWhorter.
Tough to make a persuasive argument for anyone else. I half expected him to be massaged out of his job after the Nebraska game. The offensive line’s performance all last year was abysmal.
by TKO on Sep 3, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions
I chose McWhorter
Though, admittedly, the one thing Major and Mc have in common is the least talented positions on the team. I know Major’s not to blame for the dearth of talent at RB; does anybody know how much influence McWhorter has in recruiting? I never hear of him as the guy who is on the trail—Major, Champ, Giles, Kennedy, etc.
This
“It seems like every year Tolly is expected to pull a 280lb rabbit (Tyrell Higgins is a great name for a Continental Giant) out his metaphorical hat”
Allsome.
You ain't hurt...
Peter...I cannot recall.
Do you have UT winning RRR?
"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp
"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose
"I'm Colt McCoy and I Am Second." ~ Colt McCoy
by Mulliganville on Sep 2, 2010 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm going to duck after I say this...
…but I think it’s gotta be Muschamp. His “Legion of boom” got absolutely torched by the last two decent offenses they faced. Giving up 80+ points over the last three games wasn’t real encouraging.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
by adt2 on Sep 2, 2010 5:42 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Please tell me you are not serious
Because this is so incredibly wrong I wouldn’t even know where to start.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 2, 2010 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Start with telling me why you think it's wrong, without resorting to calling me stupid.
Because I’m not giving the man a pass for giving up 532 yards to a seven-loss aggie squad, I’m not jumping for joy because he held a Nebraska team ranked #75 in scoring offense to less than two touchdowns, or that he let Alabama score more than their season average against us when our dazed and confused freshman QB most needed him to shut them down.
Is it Muschamp’s fault when things don’t go just right? Nope. But it is my opinion that, in arguably the three games that mattered most to us, our defense wasn’t as stellar as we are all remembering. I think it will improve this year; I think there will be fewer “lapses” than there were last year, if only because the kids are a year deeper into Muschamp’s system, his attitude has continued to rub off on them, and his own recruits are coming into their own. That’s why I think he has the most to prove. The defense is more his this year than any since he’s been here. The offense has the same coaches, same types of players being recruited, same types of misjudged talent; they’ve already proved what they’re going to prove. We know what we’re going to get, minus a few tweaks here and there.
Imma go back to my ducking now.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
First of all
Calm down. I didn’t call you stupid. I think your position is pretty indefensible unless you give the qualification 40AS did (that Muschamp has pressure because of his HC-in-waiting status). Judged by the merits of a defensive coordinator, Muschamp has solidified himself. I was honestly wondering if you were just saying that for fun or if you meant it, so I asked if you were joking.
Anyway, on to my reasons. First, your entire approach is flawed. You are breaking down an entire season to three games. Thus, even if we were to agree that Muschamp’s defense underperformed those three games (which is false, I’ll get to that below), you are throwing out the other 11.
To your point about the three games, I think your memory is failing you big time. We will all agree that the defense underperformed against A&M, and Muschamp took responsibility for that. So that’s one game. But Nebraska? Are you freaking kidding me? Nebraska was held to 1.9 yards per play! I’m sure you have some idea how utterly, utterly abysmal that is, and that’s hard to do against almost any opponent. We clowned that offense despite the fact that our own offense absolutely crapped the bed and put our defense in a host of horrible situations. Our O also squandered several short fields given to them by the defense too. That was a game nearly blown by our offense; our defense saved our hides. I cannot believe anyone would think this is not an impressive performance. As crappy as Nebraska’s offense is, a lesser defense would have cracked in that situation.
Against Alabama, the situation is similar except Alabama had a better offense. After Colt went down, our offense was completely inept and left our defense out to dry for the majority of the first half. Where did that backbreaker score come from? Not from our defense… but from Alabama’s defense on the Marcel Dareus interception return. You’re going to count that against the defense too? The defense held Alabama in the second half and allowed the offense to pull itself together for a run. After Gilbert’s fumble, the game was effectively over, so if you’re going to make a big deal out of 13 meaningless points I have to think that your memory of the game is seriously flawed. Goodness me, Gilbert turned the ball over FIVE times and you’re blaming the defense for this?
No one is telling you to give him a pass for that A&M game. What I’m telling you is to take the totality of the season into account and rethink your analysis of the Alabama and Nebraska games. Muschamp has long proven he is a competent defensive coordinator; the only thing left to prove is his ability as a head coach, which we won’t get a definitive answer to until he takes over.
Let me put it this way: You’re holding Muschamp accountable for, primarily, the A&M game. What about Greg Davis? The offense nearly blew the game against Oklahoma and Nebraska, looked terrible for a half against Colorado and Wyoming, and went into hibernation after losing Colt in the NC game. Greg Davis 5, Muschamp 1. Greg Davis should have gotten your vote, then. Or let’s go deeper into the NU, OU, and Alabama games and point to our inability to run the ball effectively or pass block. You don’t think our “dazed and confused” freshman QB could have used a reliable run game? So where is your vote for MacWhorter and Major Applewhite? Not only is your methodology flawed, if we followed its logic it should spit out another name other than Muschamp.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 3, 2010 1:03 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Peter was the one who called him stupid, TES
Another caveat about the Bama game: please remember that our defense was built to stop spread offenses. They were horribly engineered to stop a power running attack (just like the year before against tOSU). I think Muschamp did pretty damn well considering McElroy literally could not drop back a single time without getting sacked. Our offense is solid (i.e. McCoy doesn’t get hurt) and we win that game handily.
Not needed
Let’s be friends, not pile on.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 3, 2010 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions
No one got owned
I should have taken his initial opinion more seriously and respectfully. After thinking about it and hearing his reasons and others, while I still disagree strongly, I can see how people could take it that Muschamp has the most pressure. To me, I viewed the question as this: Who needs to prove themselves the most in the roles they are currently in? I have no questions that Muschamp is good at his job, even though he is not perfect and can make mistakes (A&M game, and I also didn’t like some things he did against Ohio State in the Fiesta). Someone else may not think he’s proven himself quite yet, or maybe they interpreted “pressure” differently.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 3, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Fair enough
I obviously have a very different view of Will Muschamp and what he’s brought to this program, but neither am I interested in shutting out dissenting views. My “Stupid, but cute” quip was just that. It was meant to elicit a chuckle, not offense. Anyway, apologies if it did.
As for the content of your argument, I’m not sold. “In arguably the three games that mattered most to us, our defense wasn’t as stellar as we are all remembering.”
Presumably, that’s OU, Nebraska, and Alabama, right?
Oklahoma: The only reason we won that game was because of the defense, which knocked out Bradford, utterly dominated OU’s rushing game (-28 yards), turned over the ball twice, and held the Sooners to 13 points.
Nebraska: On 55 offensive plays, Nebraska had a grand total of 106 offensive yards.
Alabama: The Crimson Tide averaged a meager 4 yards per play, and were gifted 20 points by the Texas offense.
If you’re referring to the A&M game, well, sometimes you tip your hat to the opponent. Jerrod Johnson was a Heisman-caliber quarterback that night. It happens. Even to the best of ’em.
On the season, Muschamp’s unit led the nation in yards per play, rush yards per attempt, tackles for loss, and turnovers. What more do you want? Absolute and complete perfection? If that’s the standard, no one is good enough.
You ain't hurt...
JJ is very good...not VY good, but very good.
aTm has an arsenal on the offensive side of the ball. I’m discounting the final two TD’s in the MNC as they were very short fields.
"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp
"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose
"I'm Colt McCoy and I Am Second." ~ Colt McCoy
by Mulliganville on Sep 2, 2010 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions
No excuses for the aTm game last year.
We got torched and the D was not good. I totally agree about the MNC game though.
the man, the myth, the legend.
They are just tougher to play there...they executed...perhaps tghe D was tired on the short week...not sure what happened.
"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp
"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose
"I'm Colt McCoy and I Am Second." ~ Colt McCoy
by Mulliganville on Sep 2, 2010 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions
I voted for Muschamp
Other than in the fickle minds of Texas fans, what exactly does Greg Davis have to prove? He has produced elite offenses, three straight NFL QBs, and (eventually) successfully transitioned from VY to Colt. Davis isn’t going anywhere, he’s not being fired and he’s not becoming a head coach. Of all the coaches I feel he has absolutely nothing to prove. Texas fans will hate them because that’s what Texas fans do, but he has nothing else to prove to recruits, the players or his fellow coaches.
While Muschamp has been everything we’d ever hoped he’d be (and more), he has only done it twice. What’s more, Muschamp is going to be the head coach, he has to prove that he is worthy every single year until he takes over or leaves (please no!). There isn’t a single coach with even close to as much to prove (to the fans, to the recruits, to the players and to his fellow coaches).
I could not disagree more if I tried
This is Greg Davis’ legacy season. Make or break.
Doubting Will Muschamp is ignoring all available evidence, for reasons I don’t particularly understand.
You ain't hurt...
Don't get me wrong
I don’t doubt Muschamp at all, I think he’s amazing. But he can’t afford to have a bad year, he’s always going to have more on the line than Davis.
And I don’t see why this is Davis’ legacy season. Next year might be with Gilbert’s second year in the system, but why would we judge Davis on a transition year?
We're probably talking past each other
I see what point you’re making, although Muschamp’s proven everything he needs to, in my book. But more importantly, I just don’t see how the pressure isn’t on the offensive coaches — Davis and McWhorter, in particular. They’re the key to making the most out of what will be a badass defense, and making progress towards a real title run in 2011.
Put it this way: do you doubt the defense will be ready to compete for the national title in 2011? Do you worry that the offense might not be?
The pressure is on Davis and McWhorter. I respect your point about Muschamp as the coach-in-waiting, but setting that aside, that the onus is on the offense seems to me beyond dispute.
You ain't hurt...
The reason is because you've taken the Kool-aid.
Look, I like Muschamp a lot, and I hope he turns out to be everything we’re all hoping he is. But to call me stupid because I think 80+ over a 3-game stretch isn’t all that admirable is just you being a homer/fanboy – which to me is equally stupid.
For every 3-point defensive performance against a UCF, there was a 20-point meltdown against Louisiana-Monroe. Yes, we finished near the top in scoring defense; but holding the patsies to a touchdown or less does that – even though you let the other teams score 20+.
Don’t get me wrong – it’s not like I think Muschamp has to have the #1 scoring defense this year, or the Head-Coach-in-Waiting gig is off. But I do think he’s gotten the benefit of a lot of burnt-orange-colored viewing over the last few years, and I for one will be a whole lot more comfortable when we can lock down everybody - not just the UCF’s and Rice’s of the world.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
ok...then with that logic..
I for one will be a whole lot more comfortable when we can lock down everybody – not just the UCF’s and Rice’s of the world.
Why aren’t you holding the offense to the same standard? We were crappy on offense against the “elite” teams like OU, Alabama, and Nebraska, but I don’t see you making the same argument for them. Throughout last season, how many games did the offense carry our defense? The A&M game? On the flip side, how many games did our defense win or keep us in the game? More than one for sure.
by vy til i die on Sep 3, 2010 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions
the team's attitude
One might experience difficulty measuring the team’s Muschamp-era attitude, but I think it’s fair to say that most of us have seen a difference.
Would Chizik or Akina/MacDuff have done better in the 2008 and 2009 seasons?
Your 80+ over three games argument annoys me because it doesn’t reflect the TERRIBLE Texas offense in the Nebraska and Alabama games. Even a great defense with excellent fitness will be gassed when, for instance, the offense turns the ball over 5 times, in addition to multiple 3-and-outs. I don’t blame Alabama’s late offensive surge on Muschamp (or not completely on him) because the defense had to take the field too often earlier in the game. I think the difference in time of possession was something like 8 or 9 minutes. They were gassed midway through the fourth quarter. This additional time on the field cannot be attributed to the defensive coordinator. It’s misguided to place all blame at his feet.
I believe a team without Muschamp loses to OU in 2008 and 2009 and loses to Nebraska in 2009 and possibly in others.
I’m almost tempted to believe you’re taking this adversarial position as some sort of blogging debate experiment, a mind game that doesn’t reflect how you actually feel.
PB didn't call you stupid
This is why we can’t have nice things. Not everything has to be a dick measuring contest.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
by run Bevo run on Sep 3, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I think offensive line is our weakest link right now
so I’ll go with McWhorter
by goingforthecorner on Sep 2, 2010 7:26 PM CDT reply actions
Is it fair that this be a make or break year for McWhorter when:
1. The system is different
2. Every starter is at a new position, and three starters are new
3. Almost the entire backup situation is freshmen
4. One starter is sidelined
5. Most critics feel we lack an A-level running back
If all goes awry, Mack may need a fall guy. And it may be McWhorter. But it’s not like the centers, guards and tackles are showing up on NFL Draft lists.
There's the rub
With our ability to recruit, why don’t we have any O Linemen on any draft lists? Is it just bad judgement in recruiting, bad luck with injuries, or is it the coaching they get after they arrive?
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Sep 2, 2010 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions
6 votes for Mack?
Seriously?!
In Mack Brown We Trust!
Was going to make the same comment..
I’m assuming those votes come from readers north of the red river, or perhaps college station.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 2, 2010 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed.
Mack and Major ought to be exempted from this list. Major could be coaching Earl Campbell, and Earl wouldn’t have gained any yardage last year because the O-line sucked balls.
Mack – well, as far as I’m concerned, Mack has proven all he’ll ever need to.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
Tyler Rose
I’m pretty sure Earl Campbell would have gained yardage against 9 in the box last season, dude is a badass.
"Sectional football games have the glory and the despair of war, and when a Texas team takes the field against a foreign state, it is an army with banners."
~John Steinbeck
by HazzardousHorns on Sep 3, 2010 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Yep, he probably coulda.
And last year Earl was fifty-four years old and rode around in a golf cart. Now that’s bad-ass.
by TKO on Sep 3, 2010 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Who?
I’m not a G. Davis hater but after Colt went down in the NC game I bet Davis eyes were bigger than Gilberts. Watching the play selection in the first half reminded me of the old OU waltz when Simms was playing. Run, run, pass, kick, run, run, pass, kick. Play not to lose. He was trying to avoid mistakes but it sure read panick & it certainly set Alabama up with a 45 yard field the whole half. Sorry for the editorial, my question is : If Greg Davis were gone today, aside from Major, who replaces him?
LH
Brilliant:
Regardless of your opinion on McWhorter, please take a moment to be thankful that he replaced Tim Nunez, who now coaches offensive line at eHow.com.
I LOLed a couple of minutes.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo

by 





























