Upon Further Review: Texas Offense vs Tech, First Half
It took a while -- and a non-trivial piece of my soul -- but last night I finished charting Texas' first-half performance on offense versus Texas Tech. You'll find the gory details beyond the jump, but I'll lead with the conclusions, since I'd imagine most of you just want the upshots. Not that I blame you...
- I'm not going to chart the second half play-by-play. Time permitting, I might type up some notes on my second viewing, but I feel confident in saying that frame-by-framing my way through the first half gave me more than enough to understand what we're doing, where we are, and what the issues are heading forward.
- Moreover, while it's not always the case, in this instance my second viewing of the game revealed that my initial postgame reaction was overwhelmingly on target. Give that a read to fill in any gaps I miss here with the offense, or to look at the defense. There's not much from that write-up that needs editing, on either side of the ball. (Likewise, I highly recommend Scipio Tex's post-mortems on both the offense and defense/special teams.)
- Moving into the specifics: Mac McWhorter has to go. I don't know that a position coach has ever been fired mid-season, and I definitely don't know that doing so would be of any use. And I'm still all for it. We saw on TV Mack Brown tear down the sideline looking for McWhorter after the first interception, and after the jump you'll see this frustrated blogger chart all the other instances that evidenced gross incompetence from our line coach. The line issues run much deeper than McWhorter alone, of course, but if he's coaching this group at all, it's to their detriment.
- At the in-game level, the most frustrating thing about Greg Davis is not that he gets himself into trouble, but how he reacts to the problem presented to him. It's like reacting to your girlfriend telling you that you're losing her for taking her to Chili's every night by taking her to an Outback Steakhouse. "You said you wanted something exotic?"
- Okay, it's also frustrating that Greg Davis keeps taking us to Chili's. The goal line packages on 3rd and short in our own territory were as pathetic as they were stupid. It belies a fundamental misunderstanding of spacing principles, or a misguided sense of priorities, or both.
To the extent you're interested, the following key will be helpful:
Pro Trips: Gilbert under center, single tailback behind QB, TE and 2 WRs strongside, 1 WR down on the weakside.
Spread Trips: Gilbert under center, single tailback behind QB, TE and 1 WR weakside, with 2 WRs split high strongside.
Pro Gun: Gilbert in the shotgun, single back alongside him, TE and single 2 WRs strongside, 1 WRs alone on the weakside.
Spread Gun: Gilbert in the shotgun, single back alongside him, TE and single WR weakside, 2 WRs alone on the strongside.
Five Wide Empty (Gun): Gilbert in the shotgun, with empty backfield and five wide receivers.
Ace Trips: Gilbert under center, single tailback behind QB, twin TEs, and 2 WRs strongside.
Finally, you'll note within the play notes various +/- scores for players. They are inherently arbitrary, but consistent insofar as they're all determined by me and what I think important. Feel free to weight things differently yourself, or ignore the scoring as altogether too vague to be insightful.
FIRST QUARTER
| Line | Dn | Ds | Offensive Formation |
D-Formation | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| KICK | -- | -- | -- |
KICK | -- |
Goodwin | 20 | |
| [Texas 0 Texas Tech 0] Deep kick into the end zone goes for a touchback. |
||||||||
| O20 | 1 | 10 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base | Pass | Bubble Screen | Davis | INC |
| Gilbert takes the snap out of the gun, fakes a handoff to Whittaker standing alongisde him on the right, then immediately throws a bubble screen to Mike Davis, with Malcolm Williams blocking. Davis' man is blitzing, so maybe this was a hot read, but the play fails, and not just because Davis drops the easy catch. Even had he caught it, safety Cody Davis was on top of him as the ball arrived. This has to develop much more quickly to have a chance to succeed. |
||||||||
| O20 | 2 | 10 | Pro Gun | 4-2 Base | Pass | Hitch | Kirkendoll | 8 |
| Davis runs a short out from the slot, while Greg Smith releases to drag across the middle, opening up a window for Kirkendoll, who runs a soft hitch. Gilbert makes the right read, delivers a pass with good velocity, and Kirkendoll makes a solid catch on a ball a little behind him. [Kirkendoll +1] |
||||||||
| O28 | 3 | 2 | Jumbo | Goal Line |
Run | Dive | Johnson | 1 |
| Greg Davis inexplicably calls for the Jumbo package, bookending the line with Greg Smith and Ahmard Howard, with Matthews the motioning H-Back and Roberson at fullback. If Texas needs an inch, or finds itself a yard-to-goal, fine. The Jumbo package has its use there, as the defense is confined by the space on the field anyway. But this? 3rd and 2 from our own 28? It's so conceptually stupid I want to scream, and we help Tech out immensely with the play call. All 11 Red Raiders swarm the line, and we're able to plunge over the left side for only a yard. Time to punt. [Greg Davis -2] |
||||||||
| O29 | 4 | 1 | Punt |
Punt |
Punt | Punt |
Tucker | 44 |
| With Gold struggling, and representing a higher risk of both getting blocked and allowing a return, Mack elects to go with the rugby-style punting of Tucker, who line-drives one that is unreturnable and nets 44 yards. | ||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 3 plays, 9 yards, 1:33. The trotting out of the Jumbo package on 3rd and 2 from our own 28 is exceptionally disheartening, demonstrating some truly awful awareness by Greg Davis. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | Offensive Formation |
D-Formation | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| TT07 | 1 | G | I-Form Tight |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Reverse | Williams | 7 (TD) |
| [Texas 0 Texas Tech 0] Holy crap a real, live, well-executed running play! Taking over after a disastrous high-snap turnover deep in Tech territory, Texas lines up in the I, with Greg Smith playing lead blocker as the H-back. Walters gets a great block on the linebacker, Mitchell occupies his man just long enough, Smith makes an excellent lead block to seal the inside lane, Fozzy follows said lane, and then finishes the run with authority. Touchdown. It was like watching an NFL team. Sadly, I know how this story ends... But for now: [Walters +1 / Smith +1 / Whittaker +1 / O-Line +1 / Greg Davis +1] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 1 plays, 07 yards, Touchdown, 0:06. It was hard not to feel good about things after that run. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| O21 | 1 | 10 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Jet Sweep |
Monroe | 14 |
| [Texas 7 Texas Tech 0] Texas sends Monroe in motion from the weakside, then hands it off to him on the jet sweep towards the strongside. Fozzy makes the key block that springs him, with Goodwin doing a nice job of downfield blocking to give Monroe the edge. [Whittaker +1 / Goodwin +1] |
||||||||
| O35 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base | Pass | Hitch | Goodwin | 12 |
| Taking the snap from under center, Gilbert fakes play action to Whittaker, freezing the LBs and bringing the SS in three steps. Gilbert looks left, before turning right and gunning to Goodwin coming back to the ball. Tech's DB is holding on for dear life, and gets flagged for interference. A very nice play in every regard but one: the pass blocking assignment is screwed up: Against a straight four-man rush, Britt Mitchell winds up humping Walters (literally) instead of blocking anyone, while Greg Smith gets left one-on-one with the freshman DE who killed us all night. Smith does an admirable job holding him off, allowing Gilbert to make the throw, but it could have been a mess. This has been a recurring problem under McWhorter, and it's insane that it still continues. In fact, I'm so pissed to keep seeing it that I'm going to start charting it. [G. Smith +1 / Mitchell -1 / McWhorter -1] |
||||||||
| O47 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Up | Pass | Quick Slant |
Davis | 2 |
| Tech brings both LBs up to the LOS and it looks like Gilbert makes the hot call at the line. Gilbert fires the quick slant to Davis in the slot, but the safety Davis is well aware that it's coming and hits Davis as soon as he catches it. Now that he's popped his cherry, we need to give Gilbert a couple more options on these kinds of reads. |
||||||||
| O49 | 2 | 8 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Trap | Whittaker | 6 |
| Another fine block from Greg Smith on the backside, while Texas pulls Walters left, where he delivers a very solid job to spring Whittaker. Goodwin does a poor job of maintaining his block downfield or Whittaker picks up 20. [G. Smith +1 / Walters +1 / Goodwin -1] |
||||||||
| TT45 | 3 | 2 | Pro Gun |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Power | Whittaker | 3 |
| Every lineman except -- guess who -- Mitchell does their job on the play, with Texas' RT all but whiffing the backside DE, almost sinking Whittaker's chance to pick up the first down. It's here that Whittaker separates himself from CoJo and Newton: neither of those two gets to the hole before it disappears. Fozzy does, and he finishes the run strongly to fall across the first-down line. [Whittaker +1] |
||||||||
| TT42 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Power | Kirkendoll | 33 |
| Amazing what happens when you're credibly rushing the ball and can run real play action off of it. Gilbert fakes the hand off to Whittaker, freezing the LBs and, for a crucial moment, Kirkendoll's CB, allowing him to slip by. Gilbert hits him in stride, underneath the safety, for a beautiful, perfectly-executed 33-yd gain. [Gilbert +1 / Kirkendoll + 1 / G. Davis +1] |
||||||||
| TT09 | 1 | G | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Outside Zone? |
Whittaker | 2 |
| What a mess. I've been confused all year when we've gone to the hurry-up, as we do on this snap. Our line doesn't do well with it, our QB is green, etc. This is a perfect example, as Texas goes hurry-up to try and keep a back-up Tech safety on the field. The result is a mess of a running play that I can barely break down. Snow and Smith somehow wind up combining on a block (missed), while Malcolm fails to account for the near CB while sprinting to block the safety. Just ugly, all around. [O-Line -1 / G. Davis -1] |
||||||||
| TT07 | 2 | G | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Power | Davis | 7 (TD) |
| Really nicely designed and executed play here. Kirkendoll motions from underneath the strongside, stopping above Davis in the slot. As Gilbert receives the snap, Texas floods the right side of the field, sending Gilbert rolling right, Fozzy into the short flat, Kirkendoll in a quick out, and Davis in a deeper out. Tech overplays the stuff in front of it, loses track of Davis, and Gilbert hits him on a nice throw from the run. Touchdown, Texas. 14-0. [Gilbert +1 / M. Davis +1 / G. Davis +1] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 7 plays, 79 yards, Touchdown, 3:09. At this point, it looked like we were going to run them out of their own stadium. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| TT22 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Trap |
Johnson | 2 |
|
[Texas 14 Texas Tech 0] NOTE: I accidentally screwed up the live game DVR and had to settle for the replay on ESPNU. In order to fit the game into a three-hour slot, portions are edited out, it appears. We re-join the action at 1st and 10 at the Tech 22, following 5 plays that covered 48 yards for Texas. Kyle Hix loses a one-on-one battle with Colby Whitlock, who makes a nice play to tackle Johnson after a short gain. |
||||||||
| TT20 | 2 | 8 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Up | Pass | Flag | Davis | INC |
| Texas rolls the pocket to the right and blocks Tech's four-man rush reasonably well, but this is one of those plays where Gilbert appears to have his mind made up before the snap where he's going. He trains his eyes on Davis all the way and, with space to slow down, let things develop a little, and step into a throw, guns an uncatchable pass out-of-bounds. [Gilbert -1] |
||||||||
| TT | 3 | 8 | Spread Gun |
3-3-5 | Pass | Screen | Davis | INT |
| What a disaster. It's a called screen to Whittaker all the way, but Mitchell blocks DE Smith like it's a dropback pass like any other, leaving his man upright to tip the pass and then, in a nice athletic play, intercept it. Mack goes tearing down the sideline to scream at McWhorter. [Mitchell -1 / G. Davis -1 / McWhorter -2] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 9 plays, 44 yards, Interception, 3:51. Obviously, the turning point in the game for our offense. After a moderately encouraging start, things are about to go south in a hurry. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| TT20 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Up |
Rush | Trap |
Outside Zone |
-3 |
|
[Texas 14 Texas Tech 0] One of the ugliest run plays you'll ever see. And YET ANOTHER screw up on the assignments. Snow pinches down to double the playside DT with Walters, before releasing to the second level, but Huey takes the backside end and Hix the rushing Will. Notice anything missing? That's right. We leave the weakside DT, who lined up in a 3-technique, completely unblocked. Meanwhile, Mike Davis matadors at the man he's supposed to block, and the Tech SS so easily reads run that he sprints up to help bring down Fozzy for a loss of 3 yards. Just an atrocious play. [G. Davis -1 / McWhorter -2 / O-Line -1 / M. Davis -1] |
||||||||
| TT23 | 2 | 13 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base | Pass | Flag | Whittaker | 4 |
| It's a called screen to Whittaker in the strongside flat, and there's decent green in front of him, but the blocking of both Kirkendoll and M. Davis is feminine, and the room to run is quickly erased. Fozzy gets dinged on the play and heads to the sidelines. [M. Davis -1 / Kirkendoll -1] |
||||||||
| TT19 | 3 | 9 | Spread Gun |
3-3-5 | Pass | Screen | Davis | INT |
| Un.be.lievable. Texas Tech rushes three -- again -- and Texas winds up with Mitchell one-on-one with DE Smith, while three -- THREE -- Longhorns linemen wind up just standing there, looking ahead, blocking nobody. Smith works Mitchell, tips the pass, and the rest you know. [Mitchell -1 / O-Line -1 / G. Davis -2 / McWhorter -2] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 3 plays, 1 yard, Pick 6, 1:42. There are no words for this level of incompetence. I don't know if an offensive line coach has ever been fired mid-week, but if ever there was a time... |
||||||||
SECOND QUARTER
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| O20 | 1 | 10 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Reverse | Goodwin | -10 |
| [Texas 14 Texas Tech 7] NOTE: This drive begins with 1:39 left in Q1. Sigh... This is quickly getting old. Texas lines Goodwin and Davis side-by-side, hands off to Fozzy, who tosses it to Goodwin on the reverse. It's slow to develop, and the blocking is... well, you can probably guess. First off, Hix lets the playside DE charge into the area where Goodwin's about to arrive unimpeded, leaving Gilbert to block him one-on-one. Gilbert manages to push him underneath, but it forces Goodwin waaaaay upfield -- 8 yards behind the LOS to be exact -- as Hix fires out into open space, where he promptly whiffs the man he's to block. Goodwin niftily dodges him, but Michael Huey is bear hugging his man for a holding penalty, and a fortunate-to-gain-five-yards is quick a loss of 10 on the penalty. [Hix -1 / Huey -1 / O-Line -1 / G. Davis -1 / McWhorter -1] | ||||||||
| O10 | 1 | 20 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base | Rush | Power | Whittaker | 6 |
| Miserable blocking yet again, and we're officially lost. Whatever semblance of order we flashed to begin the game is gone. We're letting Tech shoot gaps, confused on assignments, and getting pantsed up and down the line. Only a nifty bit of athleticism and burst keeps this from being a loss. [Whittaker +1 / O-Line -1] |
||||||||
| O16 | 2 | 14 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | In | Kirkendoll | 15 |
| Texas sends Kirkendoll in motion right to left, and the pass protection is strong. We catch Tech in zone, leaving Kirkendoll matched up with a LB. He actually runs a pretty crappy route, but the LB is crappier, he springs free, turns up field, and is able to pick up the first down before being tackled. Nice job by Gilbert stepping into the pocket and delivering the ball on target. [O-Line +1] |
||||||||
| O31 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Go | Williams | INC |
| A nice play action to Whittaker leaves Gilbert with a great pocket and a beautiful set up in front of him. He's got Williams streaking deep on the Go, the safety out of position due to the play action, but he just outright underthrows it. If it's a good ball with some air under it, Williams catches it for 6. Gilbert fires a laser that comes in well short, and it's broken up as Williams comes back for it. [G. Davis +1 / Gilbert -1] |
||||||||
| O31 | 2 | 10 | Pro Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Sack | Gilbert | -3 |
| We get beat by a four-man rush despite leaving Matthews in to protect? That's six-on-freaking-four. And we lose. Why? Because Matthews winds up one-on-one with the defensive end. Look, Matthews didn't do a great job on the block, but that's a failure in blocking assignments. Again. [Matthews -1 / McWhorter -1] |
||||||||
| O28 | 3 | 13 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | In | Kirkendoll | INC |
| Tech rushes four, we pick it up fine, and Gilbert has a nice pocket to step into. He double clutches a little bit and fires a frozen rope to Kirkendoll who is open at the first down marker underneath pretty soft coverage. But the throw is a little high, and Kirkendoll disappoints by failing to haul in a ball that was tough, but catchable. [Gilber -1 / Kirkendoll -1] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 5 plays, 8 yards, Punt, 2:47. Not a very good drive for Gilbert, who's clearly unnerved by the series of preceding events, which really weren't his fault. Perhaps to be expected from a first-year starting QB in a brutal road environment, but again, the blame for the preceding meltdown predominantly belongs to the staff. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| O16 | 1 | 10 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Inside Zone |
Whittaker | -2 |
| [Texas 14 Texas Tech 14] Astounding. We wind up with Britt Mitchell trying to reach block Colby Whitlock. You can guess how that ended. [G. Davis -1 / McWhorter -1] |
||||||||
| O14 | 2 | 12 | Empty Set (Gun) |
Dime | Pass | Bubble Screen |
Goodwin | 10 |
| We run the quick bubble screen to Goodwin, and with Tech sending a delayed blitz, it's actually set up pretty decently. Walters does a poor job of blocking in open space, however, and Goodwin is forced outside, where his athleticism allows him to make 10 yards out of the play. Since I've been knocking them for poor effort, it's worth mentioning that Kirkendoll does a solid job blocking. [Goodwin +1 / Kirkendoll +1 / Walters -1] |
||||||||
| O24 | 3 | 2 | Pro Gun |
4-2 Base | Penalty | Penalty | Mitchell | -5 |
| The odds of me quitting the charting of this nonsense at halftime are quickly approaching 100 percent. [Mitchell -1] |
||||||||
| O29 | 3 | 7 | Pro Gun |
3-3-5 |
Rush | Inside Zone |
Newton | 2 |
| We actually appear to have the right blocking assignment called here, but both Huey and Whittaker whif on the blitzing Sam, forcing Gilbert to bail out on a scramble, where he throws it away. [Huey -1 / Whittaker -1] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 3 plays, 3 yards, Punt, 1:54. The wheels are off the track. We're a mess right now. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| O01 | 1 | 10 | Ace |
4-3 |
Rush | Dive | Johnson | 2 |
| [Texas 14 Texas Tech 14] Terrifying memories of '08 flash as Texas lines up, but at least we're not in the freaking Jumbo, as I genuinely worried we might be. Our push up front is only decent, but it's good enough to allow CoJo to plunge into the pile for a gain of 2. |
||||||||
| O03 | 2 | 8 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base | Pass | Penalty | Davis | 7 |
| Texas picks up the four-man rush fine, and Gilbert fires a quick pass to Davis on a short out. It's terrifyingly close to a pick six, except that Gilbert throws a perfect ball high and outside. Nice catch by Davis. [Gilbert +1 / M. Davis +1] |
||||||||
| O10 | 3 | 1 | Jumbo |
Goal Tight |
Rush | Dive |
Johnson | 1 |
| I hate the play call, and we're lucky to pick up 1 on a generous spot from the official. The telegraphing of our runs via the goal tight formations is so senseless outside, well, goal-line situations. We're using it on 3rd and short all over the field. A terribly disheartening lack of understanding about spacing principles and strategic attacking of defensive fronts. We're incredibly lucky not to be punting from our end zone after this. [G. Davis -1] |
||||||||
| O11 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Pass | In | Davis | 10 |
| The pass blocking breaks down as Tech gets pressure with four again, thanks to yet another bizarre assignment call on our protection, leaving Smith one-on-one with a DE as Walters blocks... nobody. In any event, Gilbert uses his athleticism to scramble right and fires a nice bullet to M. Davis on the in, who catches it at the first down marker. Or maybe not. For some reason it's not reviewed. [Gilbert +1] |
||||||||
| O21 | 1 | 10 | Empty Set (Gun) |
Dime | Pass | Slant | Kirkendoll | 45 |
| A breakdown by Tech's defense, which was probably expecting an official review of the last play. Gilbert takes the snap and fires a quick strike to Kirkendoll just as he breaks behind the zone. It's a poor scheme by Tech, and Texas neatly takes advantage. Nice play by Gilbert, who makes the right read and delivers a ball that allows Kirkendoll to continue upfield. Tack 15 on for a facemask and Texas is down inside the red zone. Again. What could go wrong? [Gilbert +1 / Kirkendoll +1] |
||||||||
| TT19 | 1 | 10 | Pro Trips |
4-2 Base |
Rush | Trap | Whittaker | 1 |
| More crap blocking as neither Huey nor Walters manage to get a hat on anyone. [O-Line -1] |
||||||||
| TT18 | 2 | 9 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Drag | Matthews | INC |
| This almost worked out for Texas, which had the right play call on but tripped itself up with poor execution once again. A couple things went wrong. First, after Matthews properly chips |
||||||||
| TT18 | 3 | 9 | Pro Gun |
Dime |
Pass | Stop | Williams | INT |
| Rookie mistake by Gilbert, who's understandably jittery by this point and throws the under route to Williams, missing that Davis is streaking past the safety into open territory in the end zone. A year from now, that ball goes to the corner of the end zone for a TD or, at the least, a jump ball. As it turns out, Gilbert's pass -- on target -- goes to Williams, who promptly lets it slide through his fingers, and into those of the Tech defender. Another turnover in the red zone. [Gilbert -1 / Williams -2] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 8 plays, 81 yards, INT, 3:32. As much blame as the coaches deserve for much of the offensive failures, this drive was largely on the players. A meager silver lining in a depressing dark cloud: three trips to the red zone, three turnovers, 7 points, all 7 for the bad guys. |
||||||||
| Line | Dn | Ds | OForm | DForm | Type | Play | Player | Yds |
| O46 | 1 | 10 | Spread Gun |
4-2 Base |
Pass | Sack | Gilbert | -7 |
| [Texas 14 Texas Tech 14] A perfect example of Gilbert's youth, as he simply holds the ball too long. Texas picked up the four-man rush just fine, and Gilbert held the ball too long. That said, I'd like to note that he didn't have anywhere to throw it, and at least part of the blame should go to the OC, which put us in the gun and got away from the play-action, which had been doing well to free Tech's back seven. We left Fozzy in to block here, Tech sat on our underneath passes, and Gilbert took a sack, afraid to make another mistake. Given all the above, this isn't particularly surprising. Is it Davis's fault Gilbert held it too long? Not directly. Did Davis do anything to approach the situation with any understanding of what had come before this? Not at all. That, in a nutshell, is the problem with him. [Gilber -1 / G. Davis -1] |
||||||||
| O39 | 2 | 17 | Pro Gun |
Dime |
Pass | Sack | Gilbert | -9 |
| Another poorly executed screen, and this one's on Mike Davis, who trots aimlessly towards the middle of the field, instead of cracking the DB who winds up causing Gilbert to hold onto the ball instead of throw the screen -- again, for fear of making a costly mistake. Gilbert's terrified, and we're doing nothing to help him. [M. Davis -1] |
||||||||
| O30 | 3 | 26 | Spread Gun |
Dime |
Rush | Draw | Whittaker | 15 |
| On the bright side, we executed the draw reasonably well. That said, we did so against a max prevent defense, so it's not saying much. Whittaker displays poor situational awareness in going out-of-bounds with 30 seconds on the clock and Tech having no timeouts. [Whittaker -1] |
||||||||
| DRIVE NOTES: 3 plays, -1 yards, Punt, 1:12. We were frazzled preceding the drive, heading into the drive, and throughout the drive. And by drive I mean "drive." A fitting capstone to a forgettable 20 minutes of football for the Texas offense. |
||||||||
CHARTIN'
| PLAYER | PLUS | MINUS |
| QB Gilbert |
5 | -6 |
| RB Newton |
0 | 0 |
| RB Whittaker |
3 | -2 |
| TE Smith |
2 | -1 |
| TE Matthews |
0 | -1 |
| LT Hix |
0 | -2 |
| LG Huey | 0 | -2 |
| C Snow |
0 | -1 |
| RG Walters |
1 | -1 |
| RT Mitchell |
0 | -4 |
| WR Davis | 2 | -3 |
| WR Kirkendoll | 4 | -2 |
| WR Williams |
0 | -2 |
| WR Goodwin |
1 | -1 |
| O-Line |
2 | -6 |
| Greg Davis |
4 | -11 |
| McWhorter | 0 | -10 |
| TOTAL | 24 | -55 |
101 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
WR Blocking
Is our WR’s blocking so poor that a dead former Presidential candidate will be able to help us?
"There are three kinds of people in this world: those who are good at math, and those who aren't..."
--GA Horn--
Great stuff once again
I missed a lot of the first quarter playing bar roulette trying to find seating. The second quarter was just an abomination. This will be greatly helpful on my DVR rewatch.
I’d love to see the chartin’ for the 22 play drive. I’d like to commit to doing it, but doubt I have that kind of time. We were definitely aided by the fake punt and 15-yard penalty, but I’d like to see if we were actually doing things right or things just fell in place due to a tired defense.
I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.
Two 15-yard penalties actually
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 21, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
*
A la Bryant Westbrook in the 1995 A&M game, defenders talking smack to players prown on the ground will more likely draw a flag. Moreover, rumor has it that the Tech defender was already warned.
Will Ford
was responsible for 29 yards. Just a few plays earlier put a hit from behind after the play.
by Infield Elephant on Sep 21, 2010 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Also
heard that Ford possibility spit on G Smith (?). I’m not saying he did, but heard such a rumor. I’m not convinced in rewatching though.
by Infield Elephant on Sep 21, 2010 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions
that's what I thought immediately
when I saw it live.
Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.
Pretty sure Kirkendoll holds the team's all-time record
for taunting following a 7 yard catch on 3rd and 10.
"Well, a guy did a Horns down to him. You just shouldn’t do that."
mitchell
Who is the most likely candidate to replace mitchell at the tackle position? We don’t have a ton of depth but I see Mack making the change at tackle before firing a coor., although I 100% agree mac hasn’t earned his paycheck lately
by trueorangeblood on Sep 21, 2010 12:20 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Well, who could we replace Mitchell with? Seriously.
Justin Blalock isn’t available. Adam Ulatoski is out of eligibility.
In a perfect world, Tray Allen is the RG and Mason Walters is available (in August) to train at guard and tackle. And he’d be a major step-up to Mitchell at RT. But Tray hasn’t played, and won’t.
Going down a level, Luke Poehlmann might be an option — if he hadn’t suffered that awful injury. He’s at least experienced.
Kelley? Kid’s been on the field for a half-dozen, or less, scrimmage plays in his career. The rest of the No. 2 line is all freshmen, other than Buchanan (sophomore).
More directly, though — the staff knew the personnel situation last winter/spring. They put Mitchell at RT because he was (sorry; it’s the truth) THE BEST OPTION. That hasn’t changed. Our coaching philosophy insofar as utilizing the backup offensive linemen is WE DON’T USE THEM, unless a starter is on the disabled list or the suspended list. As a result, Mitchell and Allen and Poehlmann got almost no PT last year, despite a half-dozen games in which they could have gotten experience without impacting our chances to win.
I know: Mitchell is limited skill-wise. His best asset is experience. It’s not his fault he hasn’t had the game time (in past seasons) to develop. You can (and I often have) ripped the staff for poor OL recruiting. But given where we are in the season, and who we have in non-starting roles, I don’t think there’s anything to be gained by replacing Mitchell. If we had UCLA and an open date and Iowa State BEFORE the RRS, yeah, Kelley or Walters (with a new right guard) might be an option. At this point, Mitchell is our best option.
PB or GoBR – Any chance we bench Mitchell? I know we are a bit limited and that OL is one of the positions physical maturation takes a bit long, but maybe we could kick out a guard to RT? I know that has been discussed. We will probably see a lot of mistakes, and it would have been better to do it by Wyoming, but maybe we need to change things up on the right side? Didn’t Mack say we’d accept some Fr mistakes to get the best players on the field?
paden?
He is supposedly the next good one at RT but I don’t know if his body is mature/up to playing size, and he might be in Mack’s doghouse for that violation of team rules. I wish we had the option of plugging in tray allen
by trueorangeblood on Sep 21, 2010 12:26 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Well, not against UCLA at least...
Right Tackle 72 Britt Mitchell | 70 Paden Kelley
by Magnificent Bastard on Sep 21, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Like a bad horror movie..
I knew where this link would take me, but I couldn’t help but click on it anyway.
According to the box score
We were 6 of 20 on 3rd down for the whole game. Selecting from the plays charted above, we were 2 of 9 on 3rd down for the first half. We converted a 3rd and 2, and a 3rd and 1, and that’s it for the first half? The other seven 3rd down plays (only one of which came within a yard of conversion) yielded 4 punts and 3 ints.
Get us in third and long, and the ball’s as good as yours.
by Magnificent Bastard on Sep 21, 2010 12:53 PM CDT reply actions
And with the way GD hates 1st downs...
All you really need to do is stop us on our 2nd and 10 or 2nd and 16 or whatever…
Simply Amazing
Man, you won’t find more detailed analysis anywhere else. As soon as I’m done typing this comment, I will stand up and applaud your, Mr. Bean.
“we don’t have a coherent approach on offense.” – That sums it up right there – no identity. We are “trying” to do a lot of things. And “trying” too much. I guess this is the year to figure that out, but it better get sorted by December.
"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda
DUDE!
This is an AMAZING, THOUGHTFUL analysis. THANK YOU so much for putting so much time and effort into your preparation!!! Hook ’Em!
Major changes won't come until a loss
I think the offense is going to eventually go back to what they were the past few years except when they play inferior teams to show M. Brown they are still trying. The offense just needs to score 14-21 points a game.
If Texas does lose a game in the next few weeks, I see Hopkins playing RG and Walters moving out to RT.
I don't know how much of a problem our "approach" is.... but one thing is obvious
We need simplify things for our O-Line, by an order of magnitude.
I don’t know how we do that.
These guys can’t even find people to block while Tech is tearing up the backfield.
Thanks for doing this PB...much appreciated
This season feels a lot like 2008 where fans were cursing GD all the way up until the OU game. Since that game, fans have kind of backed off.
Well Greg, we’re baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacccccccccck!
PB - couple of questions
Holy crap a real, live, well-executed running play! Taking over after a disastrous high-snap turnover deep in Tech territory, Texas lines up in the I, with Greg Smith playing lead blocker as the H-back. Walters gets a great block on the linebacker, Mitchell occupies his man just long enough, Smith makes an excellent lead block to seal the inside lane, Fozzy follows said lane, and then finishes the run with authority. Touchdown. It was like watching an NFL team.
Was that the only time we saw that play/alignment in the game?
Also, regarding the jumbo package on the last scoring drive – did it look to you like the spacing was too bunched up, with the FB and RB lined up too close to the LOS? It didn’t seem like Roberson or Cody had time to “get downhill” on either of the first 2 running plays in that series.
You know
I should probably chart that incredibly long scoring drive. I don’t think I have it in me to do the entire second half — these things take forever — but I’ll do that drive. For historical preservation, if nothing else. You don’t see too many drives of that magnitude…
You ain't hurt...
long scoring drive
36% of the production was by Ford.. but he plays for TT. Would you please comment on the skill level of our oline players & how highly they were regarded as recruits. Thanks for your fantastic breakdown & analysis.
Figure out a way
to sprinkle that chart with little animated yellow flags here and there.
by Infield Elephant on Sep 21, 2010 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I think we may have used the TE/H-back combo
in a non-Jumbo situation maybe one other time that I remember. In analyzing the use of that personnel grouping, it concerned me that a wide receiver was coming off the field and that neither Smith nor Matthews is proven in the passing game, but with the struggles in the running game, it would make a lot of sense to get another blocker in the game.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 21, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions
What is the word on Mack's acknowledgement of these issues?
Whether by this in depth analysis, or just by the eye test, you can just tell this offense isn’t executing, and the playcalling is terrible. I was happy to play the GD apologist through the Colt McCoy era, but now it is very clear that the man has no idea how to create packages that play to the strengths of the personnel. I’m never a fan of changing things up in the middle of a season, but a competent offensive coordinator (and what the hell, a change at o line coach) combined with coach Boom on the other side of the ball would put Texas in dynasty mode for the next few years. As it is, Muschamp is having to compensate for the other side of the ball, and will continue to be put in that position unless a change is made.
Simply put, Greg Davis is bad at his job. Let’s find an offensive coordinator who is good at his job, the sooner the better. We can’t do that until Mack stops stubbornly refusing to admit that GD is a hinderance to the success of the program. ]
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
Not going to happen
Greg Davis may be encouraged to retire or find another job at the end of this year, but he has been with Brown for years and Brown is loyal to his people, so he is not going to be canned in the middle of the season. Where would we find an experience OC available in the middle of the season? Besides, that would imply that the problem is primarily GD, and the analysis above suggests that much—if not most— of the problem is in the failure of players to block. Unless that is GD’s fault, he should not be singled out as a scapegoat.
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
Excellent read, thanks.
Really paints a picture of how incompetent our run blocking is when we can’t stop 4 guys with 6.
BTW, the full game replay is available on ESPN3.com, just FYI.
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on Sep 21, 2010 2:15 PM CDT reply actions
the sky is falling!!
the third game of a brand new offensive face and we’re the worst team ever. check out Colt’s first year at the helm, and that wasn’t even with a new offensive look. we are waiting for the team’s leaders to step up. who are our leaders? malcolm williams? right… the younger guys just don’t have the experience. in this world of instant gratification, and especially concerning longhorn fans, nothing is going to be fast enough. but i am a realist. this will take time, but in the end, we will be an excellent offense.
p.s. don’t devalue Tuberville’s ability as a defensive schemer. he didn’t make it easy on a very inexperienced team.
p.s.s. we won the damn game.
"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.
OLine
3 Srs, 1 Jr & a 5-star RSFr should play Oline more competently than what we’ve seen thus far. And, we’re seeing the same incompetent line play and inconsistant running scheme that we’ve seen pre-and-post Vince. Gilbert’s generally being cut some slack.
Same excuses since 1999
Without VY, Texas has not been able to run the ball consistently. Frankly we just spent the last 9 months moving to an offense that Greg Davis has never proven he can design and run adequately.
p.s. don’t devalue Tuberville’s ability as a defensive schemer. he didn’t make it easy on a very inexperienced team.
Apparently he made it harder on Texas (an offense full of Jrs. and Srs.) than the other teams they’ve played. Texas had less yards rushing against Tech, despite almost twice as many rushing attempts, as either SMU or New Mexico. Remember, running the ball was THE focus on offense this year.
we are waiting for the team’s leaders to step up. who are our leaders?
Funny how haven’t seemed to want for leaders on the defensive side of the ball for the last 3 years. Our DC molds leaders. Our OC waits for them to appear.
by Horncasting on Sep 21, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
What about Jamal Charles in 06 and 07?
Other Receiving Votes: Oklahoma
by pleaseplaykindle on Sep 21, 2010 8:05 PM CDT up reply actions
With Charles in 06 and 07
In 2006, the offense deserves credit for running the ball well early against some good teams (tOSU, OU, NU). But the inability to run it when we absolutely needed to caused us to lose McCoy against KSU. Against A&M with the Big 12 South on the line, we absolutely could not run the ball – 79 yards on a 2.8 per carry average against a bad defense. In the bowl game, with McCoy still not 100% and needing to run the ball again, we managed 70 yards on a 3.3 YPC average.
In 2007, the running game lived and died by the Charles long, homerun, run. For the most part we could not run the ball when we absolutely wanted to or needed to. Perfect example is the Nebraska first 3 quarters.
by Horncasting on Sep 22, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions
This argument is cyclical
just like our offense. Why is it that the “our coaches/offense suck” argument pops up every time we transition from one scheme to another, or from an experienced offense to a less experienced one?
I’ve got a few issues with your response, horncasting:
1. To say than our offense is full of Jrs and Srs misses the point completely. At critical positions up and down the offense – QB, LT, RT, & WR among others – we are breaking in new players at worst or players with significantly less experience than they people they replaced at best. Our defense was in a similar position a few years ago and we got smoked by K-State and nearly lost to Ark State and Central Florida. This year, our offense has been shaky (so far) but has managed to hold up its end while the defense has put on a clinic. If this is a rebuilding year, most teams across the country would dream to have what we have. Keep your head, and look forward to 2011.
2. Look I know you like Muschamp, and I worship the guy too. But to say that the DC “molds” while the OC “waits” is baseless. First, it ignores the simple fact that the unquestioned leader of the team is the QB 99% of the team. Colt McCoy was molded and a raw athlete by the name of Vince Young was molded into a leader. Second, we haven’t wanted for leaders on the offensive side for the last three years either. These leaders just didn’t happen to be on our offensive line. Maybe you believe our o-line needs leadership, that is a legitimate argument and one I would agree with. God knows I would have blocked on the ’05 line if Studdard told me to.
by BMG on Sep 21, 2010 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I've been saying replace McWhorter
since part way through last season when we weren’t going through a change of scheme. If you honestly don’t blame the O-line coach for the o-line absolutely being terribad three years in a row, you must think our players there suck way more than I do. For three years they’ve been showing nothing but an inability to block or hold their assignments. It’s frickin’ pathetic sometimes and I don’t know about you, but I’d blame the teacher, not the students when the whole line is having issues like that.
TEXAS FIGHT
wait on the O-Line
it doesn’t help that there have been some injuries this year as well. i don’t think you can go from a finesse team to a power team in just three games.
we’re used to a top 5 offense almost every single year. i don’t think that the coaches have lost the ability to coach. we’re just raw. we will get there. in the meantime… thank goodness for the defense.
"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.
by drankthewine on Sep 22, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions
HEAR HEAR!!!
McWhorter’s gotta go! I thought it 3 years ago, I mumbled it 2 years ago, i spoke it last year, now it’s time scream! Our guys just aren’t developing like they should be, plain and simple.
Like the chart but question on the commentary
Let’s see, GD is “taking us to chili’s”
But the WRs aren’t blocking well on run plays (as you point out, costing Fozzy a long gain on a screen plus more)
His best “playmaker” is a true freshman WR.
The OL coach has to go and overall, the OL sucked.
The RBs are pedestrian and GG is a work in progress.
I’d say we’ve been spoiled by so many trips to Bob’s (high end Dallas steakhouse) we only think Outback (my favorite ‘cheap’ steak) looks like chili’s.
As Kevin Costner’s character says in “For love of the game”, engage the mechanism, tune out the noise.
PS
the reverse nets GD a -2 grade except you point out it’s poorly blocked but despite that results in a 5 yard gain on 1st down (auto +1 in my book), is reversed due to a holding call?
But 2 “well designed” (your words) TD plays are only a +1?
We get it, you don’t like GD but come on, at least attempt to be objective if you are going to do an objective grade.
agreed in principle
very easy to comment regarding a bad play as horrendous and successful plays as acceptable, but more intriguing is trying to discern what went right and wrong on each play that yielded the end result. (for example, at ttu two years ago, i recall orakpo being held constantly – therefore poor line play for ttu. i don’t recall any/many holding penalities on ttu, therefore great line play for ttu.)
for PB’s analysis, which is greatly appreciated, i’d tweak the numbers a bit, such that it’d resemble more of the +/- in basketball. thereby, the screen would give +5 for all involved, but -15 for the hold (loss of the “gain” plus loss due to penalty yards) for the identified player. all in all, too complex for this already impressive data collection effort. additionally, if mac gets all minuses, shouldn’t his coaching have been deemed worthy on well blocked plays. nitpicking, i know and apologize, but going more for the balance than the emotion (which is still locked on the ’ . . .oh crap . . this is starting to resemble the last time we went to tech . . .’ mode.)
tone of the day is mac has issues. and, while disappointing in some of the play, i might care to look at this in a slightly different light. . . all theorhetical, but something i find at least plausible regarding all of the above:
1. GD talks with GG. he has a feel for how the kid is feeling. he knows from practice what GG is comfortable with. GD is going to do his damdest to put the team in position to excel.
2. GD, in my opinion, is much more comfortable with Tre than COJO or MFC – based on experience in big games and the much applauded blitz pick up. I believe that job #1 for GD is keeping GG in one piece.
3. GD is trying to find SOMETHING to click with this team. this happens often. as much as we demand from the players, they are 18-22 year old yound men/boys. there’s a curve. think back to previous games . . . two NU games come right up – most recently, back with JC in Austin, when it took Colt out of the game for one play to realize that the zone-read was the way to go. before that, NU in Austin again, when GD essentially called an entire series of Benson between the tackles right up the field. . . he’s got a body of work. trying to locate what that IT is can be difficult. plus, i also believe that we’re still playing relatively vanilla.
4. the love of boom has titled the balance to the perception of what GD doesn’t do (fire and brimstone) rather than what has he done (had an offense that has significantly carried the team).
5. mac has brought in the players and some have performed and some haven’t . . meaning that the best lines we’ve had (05 and 06) were, in my opinion, that way based on accountability. the 05 team held each to a higher standard. the 06 line carried that over when breaking in colt. this team . . even with the seniors, i don’t see that yet.
6. while i appreciated as a fan mack getting on mac during the game, that’s not something i care for (still bitter at buddy ryan and gilbride’s nonsense with the oilers). i like that mack keeps team issues within the team. that’s not for the fans to see.
7. i think that mack tears into GD much more than any of us believes. i think we all heard the story from dallas at half of colt’s first OU tilt. status quo isn’t something that mack’s been a believer in. for those that haven’t bought in, there’s a nice for being part of the system letter of support as you resign/take a position elsewhere at the end of the season.
8. i still believe that the intent of the offense is there – safe, cautious and ball-control. i believe that our D will average 4 pts per game and not give up more than 17. therefore, it’s GD’s and GG’s mission to get two scores a game. do that, and we’re all going to sit around like giddy kids talking about something special as the season continues to unfold.
wow . . that got long.
by unknownidiot on Sep 21, 2010 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions
good thoughts.
Jonny Walker posts on 24/7 and commented that he thinks the WR routes don’t do enough to open up spacing. Something I’m going to look for when I re-watch the game.
Funny, I didn’t know PB did this break down, was planning on working on something similar in concept but way less in depth earlier.
Thanks
Appreciate the feedback. Honestly, as I say prior to the chart, the +/- is totally ad hoc, and you shouldn’t treat it as scientific data. It’s in many ways a meter of my feelings; take it for what it’s worth.
You ain't hurt...
yep. just tossing in my two cents. i deal with numbers and minutia all the time, so my brain is just wired that way now.
maybe time to hit up one of the clerks/interns at the law firm to be in charge of tracking all of this for BON? . . . .no? (sorry, how i met your mother was on last night and remembered marshall becoming ‘fantasy football guy’ for job security).
by unknownidiot on Sep 21, 2010 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Hey, make no mistake, overall it’s good work.
Pongetti used to measure plays this way to be a plus play:
1st down, must gain 40% of the yardage to get the 1st
2nd down, must gain 60% of the yardage to get a 1st
3rd down, must gain 1st down
All 1st downs and TDs are obviously plus plays.
bit simplistic, don’t mind the subjective up or down tick on a good/bad call and frankly I’d add an uptick to a plus play and an extra down tick to a negavite play like a sack.
Great format though.
So PB also has an axe to grind? Why does every analyst who does a detailed breakdown of the offense
seem to have one of these?
by jay_84 on Sep 21, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
So what are you saying PB?
The Texas team can’t win with the current players and coaches on the O-line? I think they can, but they must be a passing team until MB gets to campus and a few more run blocking OL are ready.
Who was the O-line coach in 2004-2005? He did a good job whoever it was.
"VY" is right
You could have had 5 blocking dummies and as long as one could snap, VY could cover their flaws.
what?
The O-line in 2004 and 2005 was great. Y’all must re-watch the Rose Bowl and watch the O-line. Watch the RT’s block on VY’s famous run.
According to MBTF
Mac started in 2002, but didn’t take over full line responsibilities until 2003, making him obviously the coach of the NC line
apparently its silly season already
first our history books, now longhorn folklore. once and for all, the 2005 team won a national championship behind a superb QB, arguably the best o-line in Texas history, two lightning quick tailbacks, a fantastic TE, 3 talented WRs, a nasty D-line, several NFL caliber corners, and not to mention 2 (YES 2) NFL safeties. Did I miss anyone? a solid kicker, a great waterboy, a wonderful trainer. Even the guy that runs out there to grab the kicking tee was top notch. Seriously, VY did not play 22 positions.
What are they going to change next?
by BMG on Sep 21, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Amazing writeups
These detailed write ups that you are doing are amazing. They just blow me away with the detail. They should be used as examples in J schools about how to do sports reporting.
Sincere Thanks PB - Really enjoy the critiques on the negative plays
As an fyi, thank you for the effort. Just so you know, while more frustrating, I learn more from the mistakes than the good plays. I use your write ups to rewatch the game, that makes these posts even more enjoyable.
Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"
My Rants
1. First of all, doesn´t DJ Monroe deserve a 1 for the yardage on the jet sweep? And didn´t it look very similiar to the run against the MNC Bama defense that went for 20? And doesn´t GD deserve a -3 for the failure to integrate this guy into the offense? What evidence do we have that this kid is not unstoppable. Urban Meyer used these kinds of talent to get to a MNC – GD uses him as a decoy or less?
2. I am a little down on Longhorn fans that get down on GG. With all that is going on in those plays – isn´t it amazing how composed he was? Isn´t he the perfect type of QB to deal with this madness? The kid is an assassin. If the defense gives him a window, he is as freaking dangerous as any QB in the nation – right now! I am very pleased with his performance. He will learn from those mistakes on the tips very quickly.
Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"
Yeah, I skipped the play-by-play, sorry.
I may go back later, but watching the game three times now is enough in hoping I see something different.
Great analysis – thanks for doing this again. I agreed 100% with the postgame react and again here. Especially this, with all my heart:
Moving into the specifics: Mac McWhorter has to go. I don’t know that a position coach has ever been fired mid-season, and I definitely don’t know that doing so would be of any use. And I’m still all for it. We saw on TV Mack Brown tear down the sideline looking for McWhorter after the first interception, and after the jump you’ll see this frustrated blogger chart all the other instances that evidenced gross incompetence from our line coach. The line issues run much deeper than McWhorter alone, of course, but if he’s coaching this group at all, it’s to their detriment.
by Infield Elephant on Sep 21, 2010 5:17 PM CDT reply actions
And I'd tell him to get a real job ;)
Seriously, though: I admire what he does. It’s painstaking to go through these things in this level of detail.
You ain't hurt...
Oh, I believe it...
These are fantastic, though. Regardless of how you have to truncate them due to having a real job.
Amazing stuff
Wow, PB. Just terrific analysis. This post shows the power of a blog.
FWIW, yes, Mac McWhorter has to go. Now! Right this minute.
Just imagine
By no means am I advocating the following, I just want to throw something out there to cure the GD offense sucks brain vapor locks.
Just imagine Leach running this thing and we roll out 5 wide with Chiles, Kirk, Davis, Goodwin, and Williams. Then we sub in White, Hales, Fozzy, Fitzhenry, Timmons among others as needed. We can go all tall and roll with Harris, McCrary, Timmons, White, and Williams and throw jump balls over everyone since they’re all 6’3’’ and over. Speed team, Goodwin, Hales, Monroe, Hales, Chiles.
Back to normal programming, lets ground and pound.
"I live in the tower with Coach Brown." -Bevo
"he is running the O that Coach Will and Mack want right now."
Yeah, I’m sure Will just loves the offense GD is running right now. Like he’s known for appreciating ineptitude.
"We're Texas. We're gonna do what we do...we don't copy anybody else..."
~ Will Muschamp
by BurntOrangeBoom on Sep 22, 2010 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Great snark.
Right now, I’d ask the DC what the best offense to run is…what can’t you stop?
goutlonghorns.com
PB, is this one of your other sites? I came across it while googling all things texas. This site seems to have every article from BON on there verbatim with links to the original articles on BON. However, I did not see any of our authors credited for the great work they do.
I’m sure you’re aware of this site. Just wanted to check and make sure that all you guys who do such a wonderful job here are getting the due credit you deserve.
Thanks!
by LonghornForLife on Sep 21, 2010 6:19 PM CDT reply actions
Definitely not affiliated with PB.
Just one of a long list of websites that steal content via RSS feeds or screen scraping, slap ads all over it, and try to use SEO to get pageviews (and thus ad revenue). PB, Esq. should send a nice, long letter to that jerkoff (and a DMCA infringement notice to his host).
Thats what I thought
I agree, send that idiot a letter. He is basically replicating the entire BON website there. Don’t know if there are more sites like this out there.
PB, set this guy straight!
by LonghornForLife on Sep 21, 2010 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I tried...
…and sent an email to the hosting site, HostGator, pointing out what was going on and asking for the sit eto be taken down. I received a legal mumbo jumbo email response detailing all the hoops through which one must jump to actually compel a host to act.
This has served as a good reminder, and I’ve forwarded that email on to someone who might be able to help.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Forget about hosting. He can always get another host in a minute.
Go after him via Google where it’ll hurt. Send a DMCA letter to Google on him and they’ll force him to counter it with proof he’s not infringing. He won’t. Google will take his site off their engines and that’ll do it. Without Google, he can’t get traffic; without traffic, there’s no point in stealing.
In-VINCE-able.
by iamjackburton on Sep 22, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Never thought of this
Great idea
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 22, 2010 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions
Wow Total Copyright INfringement there
I love how he has “read full post at …” at the bottom when he’s already copy/pasted THE WHOLE ARTICLE already. What a joke. You should edit your post and get rid of his link. You just gave him a bunch of free publicity he wouldn’t otherwise get.
In-VINCE-able.
by iamjackburton on Sep 21, 2010 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions
i actually did think about that
Though SBN doesn’t let me edit my comments once I’ve posted them. Sorry!
Site Admins – If y’all can, please take out the URL to that website from my comment. thanks.
by LonghornForLife on Sep 22, 2010 3:17 AM CDT up reply actions
Thank you for the effort PB
I think it might be helpful if you increase the font size of that paragraph between the key and the chart and maybe have it blink in bright neon colors.
I appreciate BON’s willingness to highlight both the positives and the negatives. Turns out you can learn from both.
If you have Mozilla, Ctrl + will enlarge until that goes darker (black).
My eyes hate gray on white.
PB
Maybe you should include a short blurb on Greg Davis’ ill-timed WR pass with Kirkendoll. Truth be told, it was so absurd at the time that I didn’t even get that angry; I just laughed in bitterness.
by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 21, 2010 8:38 PM CDT reply actions
Exactly my response to that absurd call
No sense getting upset over something you can’t change. I’ve grown accustomed to the predictably predictable.
"Well, a guy did a Horns down to him. You just shouldn’t do that."
Fortunately, and Unfortuantely, We're Playing UCLA This Week
Which means a WIN. UCLA is simply atrocious. Forget that they were ghetto’ing up on poor Houston last week by throwing the Cougs around like they were mannequins. They won’t be doing that shit to our guys this week. Unfortunately, UCLA’s offense is utterly incompetent — yes, even more so than ours, so the win will be pretty easy, because they won’t be getting first downs, forget about scoring, these saps couldn’t do that in their sleep. The problem with that is Mack and company will still think they don’t have a problem on their hands, which, leading into the big games against OU and Nebraska, is going to be disastrous for us.
In-VINCE-able.
That analysis is truly
unbelievable. And i would tend to agree with most of it. Having said that, all this criticism of a staff that has gone to two national championship games, won one of them, won 10 games for how many straight seasons, won how many BCS games over the last 6 years, averaged what ridiculous number of points per year and yet every time i criticize Rick Barnes you’d think the world was collapsing around us.
Lmao kellen. Oh, you're right, no doubt. The irony is rusting a quaint burnt orange.
As great as PB’s breakdown and analysis are [hell, I even love the form], I’m sure Mack has better. He knows.
Mack loves execution on the football field…in the world of football coaches, that is the imperative. You execute, you win. Rarely is it violated.
He can find most any validation he needs.
So, time to get some answers and kick some ass.
‘What in the hell can you execute?’
This was our first serious battle. I expect a jump like from the first game to the second, maybe a little smaller hump…this offense has a lot to learn and will probably go through several phases and refinements the next four games.
++++++
And the world is collapsing around us. You just remind us, dammit. After last year, your floor will be a little wider. Very interesting basketball season coming up.
...You're missing the point
It may be the staff that got us there, but that doesn’t mean it’s the best staff we could have. Not to mention that the game changes quite frequently and sometimes people lag behind the curve and end up looking incompetent.
If you don’t think Macwhorter has to go, you really must think that our QB getting hit all the time and us never getting to run the ball effectively are good things because that’s what you get with McWhorter
TEXAS FIGHT
I rarely chime in...
…on the Xs and Os threads like this — I prefer reading those like PB who can analyze and discuss the intricacies much better than I.
One place I have tended to pop up in threads in the last year or two is as a de facto GD defender (a role which I never, ever suspected I would assume after that 2003 Holiday Bowl loss to Washington freakin’ State), at least in the context of defending him against the less well-articulated criticisms. (You know the type: those who bitch about how awful GD is after any play which results in negative yardage.)
Given that, I have to say that this was the first time in a while I was really scratching my head at whatever the hell we were trying to do on offense. There have certainly been times when our offense hasn’t looked as proficient as we’d hope, but I have usually been able to write them off to seemingly reasonable excuses (intentionally vanilla game-planning; GG’s baptism by fire; the realities of a bunch of college kids with the #1 target on their backs going into Lubbock on that particular night). I can’t write off what I saw this week to any such excuses. That was as puzzlingly disjointed as I’ve seen us in quite some time.
Hungry Hippos, baby! It's on!
Welcome to the Dark Side!
Muahahahahahahahahhaha.
In-VINCE-able.
by iamjackburton on Sep 22, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions
I have a feeling
GD is being wily. Arrogant even. Maybe, just maybe he thinks that on superior talent in key spots on offense and with a top 3 national defense that it is enough to get through the first four games. I’ll worry after the Oklahoma game like someone reminded above.
To me these guys are playing like things should just happen because they’re Texas. GD will have to show way too much of his hand in the RRR and because some of our guys are playing like they deserve it and not earning it we lose a close one in Nebraska. There will be one loss teams in the MNC game this year and Boise or TCU get left out undefeated. It all works out though, we get revenge in the Big XII-2 Championship Game and go on to win Mack’s second NC with our defense 6th-rounding VY lite.
Disclaimer:
Legal use of medicinal substances may have cause the hallucination that was the previous post.
And PB, as always your disection and dedication to this is awesome. Thank you for creating this site and giving me something worthwhile about Texas Football to peruse for about 30 min. a day for free. I don’t get to live in Texas right now so this is my connection, God bless you.
Sometimes, you just gotta do.
Alabama fans
Do Alabam fans b*tch about their passing game being horrible? No. Why? Because they win without it. Texas wins without running the ball well. Greg Davis just needs to be creative and add new wrinkles (DJ at RB).
It's problematic
There’s no reason to leave people in the box to stuff the run when you can just throw all your defense into coverage as was blatantly obvious when we played Nebraska last year. If we don’t get at least the threat of a good run, we lose the ability to do either. What do you expect we do then?
TEXAS FIGHT
From what I've been reading I think you may just see that...
All RBs are banged up (and quiet frankly are doing a poor job) so Texas has been giving DJ reps at RB. I thought we would see more that in the TTech game but we only saw the sweep play they run every time DJ is in (or so it seems). Our OL obviously has difficulty blocking for the run than perhaps Texas should reduce the number of runs up the middle and let DJ get to the edge. I know DJ is small but so is Noel Divine from WV but he seems to get the job done. Not saying DJ is the same caliber Divine is but how would Texas know if they don’t try him out at RB.
Utilizing DJ at RB, at least for part of the game, will take the target off his back because presently opposing defenses key on DJ when he comes in for his one play of the game. Using DJ at RB will also allow for a better play action IMO since opposing defenses are already dialed in on him.
ATX
The answer is in the middle
My take is that we are not as bad as has been evidenced to date. And we are not as good as the talent should be. With that said, specifically in regard to the Tech game plan, Coach Brown confirmed the strategy was to keep the Tech offense off the field. Period. While to us the play calling appeared confusing and illogical, that does jibe with the conservative play calling that occupied the clock.
I think you have to go back and look at the jumbo sets in the first half as possibly too conservative. How do you expect to maintain drives when you show all your cards? But on the other hand, had our offense given up those turnovers on our end of the field instead of theirs, it would have made for a very long night watching the hipster ring that stupid bell.
The critical issue is cohesive execution. The guys are not showing that as a mistake here or there is dooming our potential.
I agree with PB that this is evidence of the NFL style fall camp. And maybe another issue is that our offense was practicing against arguably the best overall defense in the nation and did not have any success at all in camp.
New Depth Chart for UCLA is out
I think they are lining up as we discussed yesterday 2WR, 1TE, HB or FB and TB. We might get a preview this weekend of what the real offense is IMO. That isnt to say we cant go 2 deep at all those positions b/c I think they can and should see what we have soonest. No Traylon this week. Interestingly Fozzy 1, Cody 2, Tre 3. I would have preferred Tre 1, Fozzy 2, Cody 3 but IDK injuries…
I will say also GG isnt VY
but, GG is a remarkable athlete and can move when he has to, but we have yet to see him in a true pro style yet and I think thats going to transform him when the safeties have to come up in run support and the corners are all alone against UT WRs, game over with the cannon GG has. We’ll see if an HB and FB doesnt change things with a TE. Fun time to be a fan and watch this change weekly…
The Greg Davis "Score"
Peter,
Outstanding, pains-taking anaylsis. I know you said to ignore your “scoring” system if it didn’t help, but I am curious about one thing. On a number of plays you point to failure of the O-line (and sometimes receivers) to execute their blocks, yet you give GD a negative number for that play. Are you assuming that the play called was so poor that it wouldn’t have gone anywhere even with perfectly executed blocks, or are you blaming GD for the failure in blocking?
"Only angry people win football games." --DKR
In my best, finger-pointing "Clinton" voice:
“I did not have (a come-to-Jesus meeting) with that (coach), (Mr. McWorter).”
If I’m McWhorter, I’m starting to wonder if this “vote of confidence” is going to go down the same path that so many others have.
rktlaw

by 


































