Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

In the Trenches - Mack Brown and the Texas Victory Goats


Alan_goldberg_medium


Dr. Alan Goldberg, famous sports psychologist, is taking his final putt on the seventh hole of a round of Sunday afternoon golf, when, out of the corner of his eye, he sees a herd of goats spilling onto the green from behind. Muttering to himself, "Who let a herd of goats onto the course!" he turns around. Each goat is wearing a white shirt with a burnt orange number on it. Number 7 comes tottering up, "Hey Dr. Goldberg!"
"What now," he thinks, "TALKING goats?"
Figuring that he is in some bad dream, and that he might as well just play it out, the good doctor responds, "Uh what can I do for you?"
"Well," number 7 bleats, "We just won a football game, but, like, as we exited the locker room, we, like, all turned into goats."
Goatherd_medium
A whole new concept in sports - the Texas Longhorns victory goats. You know, players that get criticized severely after wins? Only at the University of Texas, eh?

 

Dr. Goldberg peruses the gangly group, seeing numbers like 1, 9, 83, 64, 28, and 89. One especially scrawny, sickly-looking goat wears number 72. "So how do you think this happened?"


The 7 goat turns his head sideways, "If we knew, we, like, wouldn't be here. I mean, we went up to Lubbock, where Texas has lost 3 of the last six times and lost in 2008, on that, you know, freaky pass at the end of the game. And anyway, like we just WON THE GAME, 24-14, and were feeling pretty good about ourselves, and were headed out to get on the bus to the plane, and blink, we all turned into, like, goats."

"What's your name, son?"

"Garrett."

"Well, Garrett, I have a few questions. Why don't we step over to my golf cart and try to sort this out?"

Bleating louder now in encouragement, the cluster of goats parades over to surround the doctor as he sits in his cart.

" So, were all your teammates turned into goats?"

"Well, sorry, sir, I guess, like, not all of them were. It looks like only some offensive players became goats. It looks like defensive players numbered 3, 21, 32, 44, 91, and even, wow, number 8, headed off on the bus."
"How do you feel about that, Garrett?"

"How d'ya think I feel, I mean, we won the game. I guess I, like, threw three interceptions and got sacked a few times. But hey, I threw for over 200 yards and for two touchdowns. I mean, like, what's up with this goat business? You're only, like, a goat when you lose, right?"

"And I had a great kick-out block to help score the first touchdown," chimed in number 83. " My name is Greg, by the way.

The babble of bleating crescendoed, as each goat tried to get in what they had done well. Dr. Goldberg held up his hands. "OK, OK! Calm down."

He reached into his pants pocket and pulled out his smartphone. "We can figure this out guys," as he peered sideways, still not convinced that he was really surrounded by a herd of talking goats who claimed to be the Texas Longhorn offense.

"All right let's take a look at the play by play here on the internet. Surely we can identify what this is all about... Wait!, Here's an analysis straight off the internet from a couple of wiseguys named ''Peter Bean' and 'burnt in ny.'"

"What would they know? I mean their just fans!" fumed number 64.

"Calm down, 64, maybe they are FOS, but then again, maybe he doesn't have all this baggage and the need to keep up the good PR front like your herder, ah, coach. And by the way, where is your coach anyway?

"Oh, you mean Coach Davis?" The goats all looked at each other. "Uh, he, like, lost us."

"Really? How did that happen? I mean, how does a coach lose his offense?"

"I don't know Dr. Goldberg. He was muttering a lot at the end of the game, and just, like, kept calling the same play over and over." The goats sort of rolled their eyes and stamped their hooves.

Dr. Goldberg pressed his fingers to his temples. This wasn't necessarily going to be easy. I mean it's like the first rule of psych warfare that if you cut off the head, the body will die. But these guys looked like they hadn't been herded properly in awhile. A vision of Greg Davis as Little Bo Peep flashed into his head, and he gulped down a little bile.

"All right goats, er guys, let's get into them." He held up the smartphone.
 

Star-divide

By burnt in ny, Sept 21, 2010

Disappointing Plays

After the Texas A&M loss in 2007, a furious Mack Brown instituted a new framework for accountability called NOS, or "Not Our Standard." Players who fumble, incite penalties, or otherwise screw things up get replaced or otherwise do some extra physical work. The same accountability, though likely without the physical consequences, presumbaly exists for the assistant coaches. With that said, after watching the Longhorns for 3 games, UT fans care clearly crying out, "That offense is Not Our #$%&! Standard!"

So fans looking for accountability were faced with this Mack Brown quote

Well I think it's wrong to say they're not playing as good as they want to. Usually, somebody is. It's usually one guy, and the problem were having is that it's a different guy all the game, so it's really frustrating for us. We should have run the ball better at the end of the game, but at the same time the game was over, so we were more conservative. We weren't going to run counters or reverses . They weren't going to win if we didn't turn the ball over. So I think we put more pressure on Cody when he was in, and we put more pressure on the offensive line when they were in.

Reading between the lines, and looking at the game evidence, Texas didn't look like they were going to run counters or reverses AT ANY TIME during the game. So "pressure" implies the following: We're more worried about screwing up than making plays, so we'll run the simplest offense possible. That puts "pressure" on the running backs and offensive line to make plays in an offense designed to fail. This, in turn, puts "pressure" on Garrett Gilbert to make plays against a defense with no respect for the run and in too many third and long situations.

081810-cfb-mack-brown-jw_20100819002454_660_320_medium

Mack Brown - self-fulfilling prophet? static.foxsports.com

Which brings the fans to another Mack quote:

We're really proud of Garrett when he did not panic when he had the worst luck I've ever seen with the tipped balls.

Inspection of game tape reveals that Garrett's tipped balls had little to do with Garrett, but also little to do with luck. Scott Smith, hero of the defense for Texas Tech, looks to be a very good defensive end that will give most of the teams he faces fits, but he sure gave Britt Mitchell a lesson in inside moves in the first quarter. It was that release of Smith inside that led to the tipped balls and interceptions. Gilbert didn't help by completely locking in on his intended receiver almost from the snap. Furthermore, as the announcer Ed Cunningham discussed, Mitchell should have cut blocked Smith on the screen pass. Whether that was a failure on Mitchell's or offensive line coach Mac McWhorter's part remains unclear.

To attribute the tipped balls to "luck" is the epitome of Mack Brown press conferences. What is more disturbing is

We score 34 points in the first two weeks and everybody is mad, then we score 24 at Lubbock, which is hard and everyone is mad. So it's not fair for these kids right now. We've all got to keep them positive. We've all got to keep coaching and doing a better job coaching than we are now. But I think our fans also need to pull for our offense. We've had a great offense around here recently, and we've been spoiled. But this one doesn't score as much, but we all need to get behind this offense.

and

I'm a little shocked that people are shocked that we are struggling because it had it written all over coming in. We weren't going to be as consistent.

This to me reeks of self-fulfilling prophecy. The logic goes something like this: "We've got a young quarterback and young guys on offense, so we need to run a simple offense, because these young guys won't be as consistent. We need downhill running to keep pressure off our young quarterback, and its got to be simple because we've got yourng players on the rigt side. If we run a simple offense, though, defenses will have the advantage, which will put "pressure" on the young players and they won't be as consistent. So we have to be more consistent in our execution to win." I just have one question: did it ever occur to Mack that the coaches have created the inconsistency in their players by creating an offensive scheme that is destined to fail at too high a frequency?

By my count, there were 40 "disappointing" plays, or incomplete passes, runs of 2 yards or less, interceptions, sacks, tackles for loss, or penalties out of 84 offensive snaps. Ten plays I attributed to a predictable play call in which everyone in the stadium knew what play was coming and to which position on the field it would be run. Offensive line failures (either physical failures, mental errors or penalties) accounted for 13, with five of these at the feet of Britt Mitchell. Bad decisions or footwork by Garrett Gilbert accounted for 6. Wide receiver drops or failed blocks accounted for another 6, and missed blocks or drops by tight ends or H-backs accounted for 3 bad plays. A 50% failure rate is beyond "inconsistency" by any standard of success, and certainly would seem to qualify as Not Our Standard.

Thus Mack's plea to the fanbase to llower our expectations for this offense is a plea to excuse future losses. Excusing poor play on the basis of "weird things happen in Lubbock," is just what it sounds like - an excuse. What can I say but, "We're Texas," and we're not goig to lower our expectations. This is what got the team in trouble in 2007 - excuses like injuries on the offensive line, inconsistency in executing the running game, Colt taking on "too much," etc. Such excuses to cover poor coaching and poor play in 2010 may yet lead to similar results unless Mack can re-energize accountability on offensive coaches and players in the next two weeks.

The Whitlock Maneuver

2455542_medium

Colby Whitlock celebrates tackling Chris Ogbonnaya for a safety in the  game in 2008. He was similarly disruptive in 2010 grfx.cstv.com

On the first three series, which saw Texas' offense score two touchdowns and rush for 1, 7, 14, 6, 3, and 2 yards (33 yards in six carries, or 5.5 ypc), Colby Whitlock, Texas Tech's all-conference candidate defensive tackle who infamously stuffed a Horns run in the end zone for a safety back in 2008, was lined up at the 3-technique, that is, right in front of guard Michael Huey. On virtually all the ensuing plays, Whitlock lined up at the 3-technique in the gap between Mason Walters and Britt Mitchell. Result? Texas running backs or wide receivers carried 31 times for 56 yards, including three draw plays on obvious passing downs that went for 30 yards. On obvious or potential running downs, Texas therefore rushed 28 times for 26 yards, not counting sacks. Yeah baby, yeah!

Why? Whitlock got under and inside Mitchell on almost every play, and Walters was attacking linebackers upfield or pulling to the left on almost every running play. Mitchell had no answer in strength for Whitlock. So Whitlock crashed almost all the inside runs from the backside or penetrated deep into the backfield, freeing up linebackers to attack the only two running lanes Texas used for much of the game. Greg Davis mostly covered Mitchell on the outside with a TE from the second quarter on, but Tech stayed in their 3-4 defense most of the game and forced the TE to block the outside linebacker, and Whitlock's unopposed inside slants put him out of reach of the TE anyway.
.
Mike-myers-austin-powers-4_medium

Yeah, baby, yeah, that Texas running game is just FABULOUS!www.popcrunch.com



My Left Foot

The concerning thing about Britt Mitchell is that he seems to block well when anchoring on his right foot, but seems to have much less leverage when he anchors on his left foot. Two early runs by the Horns, including the touchdown by Fozzy, were greatly aided by good seal blocks by Mitchell. On the other hand, the two tipped passes by Scott Smith both occurred because Smith got Mitchell's weight onto his left foot and then pushed him away. Once Whitlock matched up with Mitchell, Texas' running game literally ground (pun intended) to a halt. Couple that with Scott Smith's motor and quickness matched up on Kyle Hix, and we had a replay of General Erwin Rommel's panzer divisions pulverizing the French flanks in the Ardennes in World War II. Given these physical mismatches and, because of youth and ineffective use, no real TE or H-back help, and less than 1 yard per carry is not surprising at all and has nothing to do with the running backs.

An Inconsistent Truth

As brilliant as some Garrett Gilbert plays have been, including several zipped passes into tight windows, and the off-balance throw to Matthews for the last TD on  in the Tech game, GG is very inconsistent in his pocket footwork. Sometimes he throws with his back leg extended to far back, which causes him to "wind up" on his throws, and these are often too high. Other times, Garrett gets happy feet because of pressure on his right side and throws off his toes, which leads to passes that are too low. The impromptu flip was the sort of pass that Colt McCoy, who couldn't throw a deep out to save his life, could make with high accuracy, and Texas fans may be a bit spoiled. In any case, fans are just going to have to live with Garret Gilbert's inconsistent footwork for 2010 , because if he tries to correct it now, he'll just spend the season thinking about it and being tentative. Given the lack of success so far in the running game, the coaches must just let Gilbert play and not think about how he is playing.

Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Imminent Drug Cocktail

So if we boil it down, here is the Longhorn offense in a nutshell. The offensive line is good in running certain blocking schemes in certain directions, but the combinations of these that have proved effective from either the pro-set or spread with 1 back, 1 TE, and 3 WR is so few and so restricted in space that the defense can focus their attack on just a few gaps and eliminate any advantages the offensive line has in the box on running plays. Playaction has been the most effective type of play for Texas just because Garrett is so good and because teams are over-committing on the run because Texas has tried deep routes only when there is coverage breakdown and a clear receiver advantage. Different formations, such as 1 TE, 1 H-back, 2 WR, have yielded successful plays (such as Fozzy's TD against Tech) when they have been used, but, like the Jumbo package, they scream predictability. In short, Texas  thus far does not have the physical ability or technique along the offensive line to run out of a passing formation (except for draws on obvious passing downs, and the physical ability, experience or technique in TEs and H-backs to pass out of running formations. Trick plays like reverses and options are not likely to work becasue defenses are not overcommitting to stop outside runs ( of which the jet sweep is the only one Greg Davis has used thus far).

So what's possible? One, the fans could take the red pill Mack is offering, revel in our conservative, mistake-avoiding (ha!) offense, celebrate the success of every other play, and be happy when we score more than 17 in this re-building year. Or the fans could take the blue pill and slide down the rabbit hole into the cold world of rebellion against Mack and the establishment for the rest of the season, constantly comparing the Horns to other teams ike Boise State, Oregon, or even, gasp, Nebraska, that seem to get much more out of their offensive talent.

Likewise, the coaches could take the blue pill and start raising expectations, stop worrying about risks, and start running the playbook, including outside zone swweps, toss plays out of the pro-set, a zone read run or two per game with Gilbert,  some TE seam passes out of 2 TE 2 WR sets, or anything that would stop the incessant pinching of the inside 5 gaps of the offensive line by DE's and LB's and would give Britt Mitchell the opportunity to turn his defender off his right foot rather than try to jam inside moves with his left. Or, based on history with Greg Davis and Mack, not until after a loss.

 Morpheus-red-or-blue-pill-the-matrix-1957140-500-568_medium

So Texas coaches, what will it be? Take the red pill and continue to live in your own media-spun self-fulfilling false reality? Or take the blue pill and go down the rabbit hole to an ultimately better team? expoweekly.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***************************************************************************************************************************

Dr. Goldberg looks up from his smartphone. Around him, the sunlight is extingished by the bulk of large men in white football jerseys with burnt orange numbers, looking around each other. "Hey," said one, "We're not goats anymore!"

Dr. Goldberg shakes his head, "You guys never were goats. It would seem you were put into positions that made some mistakes inevitable. But you did make enough plays to win, and for some of you (he glanced at numbers 1 and 9), the mistakes are highly fixable. And for you, number 72, well all I can say is that you seem to be doing the best you can, but you might consider greater attention to your footwork."

The players convulse in high fives and cheers as they jump to their feet and begin to head off the golf course.

"Wait," cries out Dr, Goldberg, "I'm confused. Why do I still hear goats bleating?"

"Oh," says Garrett, "while uou were reading, these three goats, like, showed up."

Several players move aside, revealing three white goats with burnt orange polo shirts with the initials MB, GD, and MM. All three look a little surly and defensive.

"I'm guessing these are your coaches," said Dr. Goldberg.

"Yeah, I thought they looked familiar," remarks number 83. "Are you going to help them, too?"

"I don't think so. I can only help those who want to be helped, and these guys are in complete denial."

The goat labeled GD gazes blankly at Dr. Goldberg, thinking about the probability of success of butting the good doctor in the chin at an attack distance of 10 yards. Too low, forget it, let's just go empty set and throw for 3 yards.

"Why don't you take these goats with you," suggests Dr. Goldberg, "Maybe they'll come around in time."

**********************************************************************************************************************

Mack Brown stirs awake with a pain in his neck from lying his head on his outstretched arm on the table. He glances groggily at a clock that reads 3:23 am. The DVR screen is a blank slate of blue, and all the other lights in the building seem to be off. "Man what a dream," he mutters. "I've got to stop watching film so late."

Comment 57 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

useful AND entertaining

Great stuff, sir.

I wonder at what point we’re going to see fired-up Mack cursing out McWhorter be the standard for our offense.

Let’s just pray 2010 GD against OU has a 2008 GD against OU card left up his sleeve.

I don't always watch football, but when I do, I prefer Dos Achos. Stay thirsty, my friends.

by jc25 on Sep 22, 2010 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

The Whitlock Maneuver

wow.

now that is absolutely indicting on all involved . . how no one noticed and adjusted – FOR 3 QTRS – is absolutely stunning. i hadn’t noticed while watching the game the adjustment. worse case, this should have been fixed at half.

i light of past successes, i’d like to believe that this is some absolute fluke. the question is truly who is responsible. literally, this makes it sound as if the supporting cast utterly failed to assist mitchell. why no chip before releasing to the LBs?

i’m floored. i guarantee that i’ll be watching for this with ucla. if it occurs even once, that will be too many.

odd question, for those much more savvy than myself (well, everyone), where did suh line up in B12 championship game? has this issue been systemic and i’ve just missed it.

by unknownidiot on Sep 22, 2010 10:52 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't have an answer

as to why the Texas coaches didn’t adjust. The most frustrating thing is that a little sweep to the right behind a TE seal on the outside LB would have given more yards than what we were getting. Or, use a formation with an H-back who would combo block Whitlock in the hole between guard and center. Or the Fozzy touchdown, in which Mitchell sealed the 3 technique to his weak foot and H-back Greg Smith kicked out the outside linebacker. Texas never ran that play again the rest of the game, though I could see no difference in formation on Tech’s part.

The whole offense seems stuck in this attitude of I don’t care what tactics the defense is using, we’ll run the @#$%! play. It’s an infectious mindset of low expectations for the players, tightened sphincters, and risk management.

by burnt in ny on Sep 22, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

stellar review

thanks for posting it. great read.

i suppose the next logical question would be – could one believe that this is a front? mack claimed last year that we were playing vanilla until ou. could there be enough arrogance (sorry, but i think that’d be the correct term) of the coaching staff and players to deliberately not adjust in an effort to give false credence to others approach? highly unlikely. but, possible? maybe. probable? not likely.

i guess we find out soon enough . . .

by unknownidiot on Sep 22, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sand bagging

is not necessarily a bad practice. But I usually find that when I presume Mack is holding back, it is just my unwillingness to face the truth.

Excellent article, burnt in ny. I learned a lot and laughed as well.

by bfaut86 on Sep 22, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Autistic Offense

I did not originate the phrase “autistic offense” but it seems on the money. GD is naturally not a real time kind of guy, he does not have a feel for the psychology of his players or the momentum in a game. He can make changes only after he studies film. Being high up in the coaches’ box insulates him even more from understanding the current morale of his players. Having the constant real time responsibility of calling plays, leaves GD no time for analysis.

It would be a huge step forward for GD to come don to the sideline and stop calling the plays. At least he would have a feel for how the players are feeling and would have a little time to think about how to change things up. He could also talk directly to his rookie QB to calm him down when he gets rattled. It would also be addition by subtraction, GD no longer calling the plays has to be an improvement.

Major having to signal the plays in every play is a needless distraction. It would be better for some grad student or player to signal in the plays. Major can focus on understanding when the horns are in a bad call and over riding that bad call with a good call from the sideline.

The horns need some people who don’t have realtime responsibilities to study video during the game to determine opportunities/problems.

by Kafka on Sep 23, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd bet Major recognizes a bad or high risk call...

what I wonder is how much power he has to change it?

I’m sure he is in direct communication via headset with GD and Mack. Recognition of the defense is his forte.

Your alternative plan might be to snip GD’s headphones altogether…and the spares, too.

The pros don’t allow video interpretation on the sideline, if I remember correctly, but that might be going on somewhere upstairs or deep within their home stadium.

When a team scripts 10-15 plays to start the game, you’d like someone smart enough to recognize what play #5 is going to be (for example, after seeing the first three or four) and to figure out the long-term game plan as well.

This could all be presumptive…perhaps it takes someone in a bubble to call plays well.

Of course, to me, the best play callers could be the experienced QB on the field, if they have the knack and sensibility. They are real time.

I wonder how many plays VY called? Major did well in that regard, too, optioning into many great plays.

by whills on Sep 23, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Suh lined up

At the 3 technique over Michael Huey. Chris Hall spent most of the game trying to double-team him, but Suh almost always split that double team because Hall couldn’t get to the block in time to keep Suh from getting his right arm out in front.

Oklahoma caused major problems with backside contain as well by putting McCoy over Huey and then David Snow (Huey had an ankle injury).

I don’t hink that it;‘s any accident that out most successful jet sweeps are to the right because teams are betting that we’ll run left (we do about 2/3 of the time) and that the best strategy is to blow up the backside containment by slanting, pinching to the left side of the offense. Because that’s the expectation, the right tackle almost always gets a good seal block on the jet sweep.

by burnt in ny on Sep 22, 2010 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

interesting

so, basically, due to the inefficiency in one set, GD maximizes the liklihood of success in the jet sweep.

very, very interesting.

one day, i’d love to sit in on a coach’s meeting as the break down tape and decide how to attack a defense. i understand that we normally have a set idea of the first 10-20 plays for poking and prodding to see what we can get away with. it just didn’t seem to happen at tech, though. not sure if that was the system or player performance.

as shown in your write-up, the running game failure was likely fixable, due to a simple adjustment of technique.

by unknownidiot on Sep 22, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

GG

I have to agree on Garret’s throwing motion. He obviously has much more power than colt, but it seems like it comes at a trade-off for footwork and consistency.

While colt would end each pass in the same compact throwing motion with his body square to the line of scrimmage, it seems like once garret starts moving around he will randomly throw off the front or back foot and lean his whole upper body into the throw to make up for the lack of power from the hips.

by James McCosker on Sep 22, 2010 11:05 AM CDT reply actions  

He's got a cannon

The most enjoyable thing on a hard-to-watch offense for me is the sight of GG’s spirals whizzing through the air. I absolutely love his deep accuracy. What will take work is his footwork — as you point out — and his touch on short passes, screens, etc. Both of those will come with time but the things he does naturally are difficult to teach once a player is out of high school.

All that said, the touchdown to the tight end was a beautifully thrown ball. (When was the last time a sentence like that was written about a Texas team?)

Simplicity is always the secret, to a profound truth, to doing things, to writing, to painting. Life is profound in its simplicity. - Charles Bukowski

by windycityhorn on Sep 22, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

this article is vomit inducing

you are the personification of the holy longhorn with an air of entitlement. your entry to the article about goats was weird. then you go on to throw Mack and company under the bus, i guess because this year’s offense does not meet your noble criteria of football . why the hell don’t you drive down from the Big City and coach the team yourself? everything Mack said was true. it was obvious that this offense was going to be inconsistent this year. get off your throne and have some understanding and patience.

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Sep 22, 2010 11:25 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't think this is the site for you

You’ve reacted to every instance of criticism with contempt. Which is fine. You’re entitled to feel however you please about the team and program.

Your comments demonstrate that you have a single point of view. You have an agenda. What Burnt in NY did here, and I did yesterday, was analysis.

If analysis isn’t your thing — makes you vomit, say — this isn’t going to be a pleasant place to hang out.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Sep 22, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Offense criteria
i guess because this year’s offense does not meet your noble criteria of football

This year’s offense does not meet Mack Brown’s criteria of what he wanted to do this year.

by Horncasting on Sep 22, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

yep

i went over the top a little too much. still, i do get tired of all the negativity. i really like what Mack and company have given us over the years. and i have complete faith that once this offense gets used to the scheme and gets over its growing pains, we’ll be at the top of the heap again. patience.

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Sep 22, 2010 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Constructive Criticism

The constructive criticism on BON & Barking Carnival is amazing and goes beyond the normal bellyaching. It does include some sharp satire, but is head and shoulders above the immature ramblings on some other sites.

by Eskimohorn on Sep 22, 2010 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I love this site!

There is no crime in a very well written and entertaining analysis, be they positive or negative. There can never be sunshine everyday, but there is always hope for a better tomorrow. The offense will improve. I believe know it. You must first admit that there is a problem. Look into a mirror and tell yourself “i’m good enough, i’m smart enough and dogone it people like me!”

Wha...? No Whaley? No Hills?

by Ese-De-SA on Sep 22, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

This offense reminds me of Chris Simms...

without Cedric Benson.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp

"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose

by Mulliganville on Sep 22, 2010 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

three games in?

ya’ll are the kind of folks that rip the team even when we’re top 5 in everything. i guess you just love being negative. bring back mackovic, right?

"you can destroy a man, but you cannot defeat him." - e.h.

by drankthewine on Sep 22, 2010 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

With all due respect

This site has been around a lot longer than you have, and we have never been shy about dishing out the praise. In fact, we love Mack Brown. A lot. I’ve said so many, many times.

The difference between us, it appears, is that you take offense when we’re critical of the staff when they don’t do as good a job.

If that’s a problem with you — again, this isn’t the site for you. I’m not trying to be a jerk, but if your only contributions to posts are to cry foul when we’re critical, then you’re probably better off not reading it at all.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Sep 22, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Top 5 in everything

Just some numbers….

National Rankings:

Coaches Poll: 4
AP Poll: 7

Total Offense: 72
Rushing Offense: 65
Passing Offense: 71
Scoring Offense: 50
3rd Down Convertions: 57
Turnovers: 51
Total Defense: 2
Rush Defense: 1
Pass Defense: 34
Scoring Defense: 9
3rd Down: 14
Turnovers: 47

'Til Gabriel blows his horn...

by mattyj on Sep 22, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hilarious stuff

Keep it up…..I needed a good laugh to get ready for the upcoming tough games ahead. I keep hoping and praying that we have some secret offensive plays were are holding secret until needed, but I may just have a bad case of wishful thinking.

by Wrangler86 on Sep 22, 2010 11:49 AM CDT reply actions  

I keep hoping and praying that we have some crafty graduate assistants who read the analysis on this site

and also have access to advanced hypnosis/mind control serums and techniques.

(Really though, I’m curious if anyone close to the program reads BON. Best analysis I see anywhere)

by drbadass on Sep 22, 2010 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Keep it Coming Burnt in NY

As usual, I’m curious what goes on behind closed doors in Mack’s fiefdom. The man’s PR sense and desire to protect his players is too keen for press conferences to provide much insight in times like these, making post mortems all the more essential.

Here’s to fewer cloven-hoofed ungulates next week.

proud to swim home

by learned hand on Sep 22, 2010 11:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Bruce Matthews

I recall that Bruce Matthews had major concerns about our OL and our blocking schemes when we were recruiting his son, Jake Matthews. I don’t know much about the technical Xs and Os…..but I have wondered about what is really going on with our O-Line (and our inability to run the ball) ever since. Maybe we need to hire him to help coach our OL and work out the blocking schemes.

Texas has too much talent to have the problems that are coming to light. Something is wrong somewhere, and that is why I love to come to this site and learn more about the technical aspects of the game. I also enjoy the humor of being able to laugh at our goats. After all, they are our goats and why shouldn’t we as fans get to help herd them too.

by Wrangler86 on Sep 22, 2010 12:10 PM CDT reply actions  

You know it's been almost two years

since we lost a regular season game. That’s a remarkable feat.

Methinks some of us have become a little too used to having a great offense led by an experienced QB. This year the cards don’t fall into place that way but fortunately it’s the Year of the Defense in these parts. I can see the benefits of conservative play calling until GG gets his feet, especially in a road game against TT with the ball dropping on the turf right and left. Things could have been much worse Saturday.

The biggest concern I have is getting the playmakers to step up, somebody needs to make some plays. Maybe Kirk, maybe Davis, maybe Marquise, maybe all three. We need some explosive plays to take some pressure off the OL.

"You've got to think lucky. If you fall into a mudhole, check your back pocket - you might have caught a fish" -- Darrell Royal

by SpiritOfTheFedora on Sep 22, 2010 12:48 PM CDT reply actions  

In Lubbock

We were very close to having a 21-0 lead. That was not bad at all. We finally got off to a decent start. I agree that Coach Boom and the defense is definitely saving us.

We do have a lot of young talent on offense, and hopefully the OLine will start to get it together and give the weapons a chance to make game changing plays.

by Wrangler86 on Sep 22, 2010 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

If we could have taken that 21-0 lead, it would have been all over

I honestly believe we can crush any team in the country if we can get a 2-3 score lead in the first half.

Our defense is far too effective with interceptions and the pass rush to be attacked through the air.

Now, on the other hand, playing from behind may not be our strength. A slow start against OU or Nebraska could be bad news bears unless we see some different stuff out of the offense.

by notsofst on Sep 22, 2010 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

True, but I am jumping out on the limb

Despite our bleating offense, I have enough faith in our D to pick Texas in both games—OU and Nebraska. I can’t believe I said it.

by Wrangler86 on Sep 22, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Our offense was pretty bad last year with an experienced QB

Now it’s just as bad, but we’ve got an inexperienced QB.

by notsofst on Sep 22, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

a lot of great points but...

…im not sure i would blame the coaches for running, what seemed to be, a vanilla scheme all game. you say:

The logic goes something like this: "We’ve got a young quarterback and young guys on offense, so we need to run a simple offense, because these young guys won’t be as consistent. We need downhill running to keep pressure off our young quarterback, and its got to be simple because we’ve got yourng players on the rigt side. If we run a simple offense, though, defenses will have the advantage, which will put “pressure” on the young players and they won’t be as consistent. So we have to be more consistent in our execution to win." I just have one question: did it ever occur to Mack that the coaches have created the inconsistency in their players by creating an offensive scheme that is destined to fail at too high a frequency?

if i understand you correctly, you are saying that the simple scheme we are running itself is what is resulting in failure and inconsistency. im not sure if that is true. in fact, there were trick plays and all kinds of complicated handoffs that were tried but they just didnt work. in fact, a bunch went for negative (im purely talking about the Tech game). they had to give those up quickly because of the damage.
i understand what mack and the coaches are doing. they understand as talented as GG is, hes making his mistakes (locking in to receivers for e.g.) and to avoid turnovers, the coaches are looking at an offense will little downside, but also obviously little upside. i think time will heal all. once the coaches have more confidence in GG and the other players, they will start taking a few risks and try a few things. i think the tech game’s outcome is very important in moving towards that thing itself.
I strongly think that this is the coaches approach and its the best given the stage we are at. i can understand this criticism if we were at the end of the season, but not at the start…

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 22, 2010 1:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Offense and trick plays
in fact, there were trick plays and all kinds of complicated handoffs that were tried but they just didnt work. in fact, a bunch went for negative

I think the bigger issue as far at the trick plays, is that they just seem to be called randomly. There was no set up of those plays with prior plays, and they weren’t done in a concious attempt to exploit anything Tech was specifically doing (over pursuit, blitzing, loading the box, etc.).

i think time will heal all. once the coaches have more confidence in GG and the other players, they will start taking a few risks and try a few things. i think the tech game’s outcome is very important in moving towards that thing itself.
I strongly think that this is the coaches approach and its the best given the stage we are at. i can understand this criticism if we were at the end of the season, but not at the start…

Alot people agree that somewhat conservative is the way to go due to Gilbert’s inexperience. The problem I have is that part of that conservative gameplan is to run the ball – something that has been stressed since January – and the running game has been a failure so far. For years we heard that our scheme did not fit our OL and that Hix, Huey and Snow were “maulers” that just wanted to fire off the ball and knock DL on their ass. We heard all offseason that the OL was really taking to the run blocking and it was finally playing to their strengths. The results are a running game that is as bad as what we’ve seen the last two years. Now we get the excuses about a new system and young and/or inexperienced line (which is really only the truth for the right side of the line where even there we have a 5th year senior and a 5-star RS FR).

My biggest frustration is that I’ve felt for a year that we are moving to an offense that does not suit our OC’s strengths – we are about to relive the Chris Simm’s offense. And we are without a QB that can hide a poor offensive scheme or poor offensive execution by making offschedule plays with his feet and/or impossibly accurate throws.

This is Texas, we shouldn’t have to have a once in a lifetime athlete at QB or force our QB to achieve the impossible as far as completion % in order to have a good offense.

by Horncasting on Sep 22, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

the issue is where you want to take risks

My argument is that by having a diversified offense that is not predictable to the defense, you risk having some players miss the play or run the wrong way or block the wrong guy, but most of the time face defenders from advantageous angles or can catch or run the ball in some open space. The current approach is to eliminate the “know the play” mistakes but have to execute the blocking and catching perfectly because the defenders know what is coming. Either approach is valid, but the latter would appear, on the evidence of the first 3 weeks, to not be working as well as everyone would like.

by burnt in ny on Sep 22, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

sure...

… the logic of your argument makes a little more sense to me now.
youre saying that given the vanilla offense now would require almost perfect performance from the offense if they want to do well against defenses since the defenses would expect it all, cuz its all basic stuff.

i sorta see the argument. but i also think that given some of the basic stuff that has gone bad (catching the ball in open space, dropping balls that are in your hand, etc), i really dont strongly believe your approach would bring anything better, maybe more bad because of a more complicated offense results in more potential mistakes. what i am trying to say is that it seems that the inconsistency we see is not because the plays are necessarily too simple, its because receivers are not holding on to the ball. if i was GD seeing receivers spilling balls on simple routes, does it make sense for me to try a more complicated route for the receiver?
now for running game, im not sure if there is specific blame, its blame all around. i think all the pieces are doing poorly. but in the passing game, i think the line is doing fine as is GG, its the receivers that have lacked consistency..

in general, i do agree with the overarching point you make, that the combination of plays is either poor. ive always thought GD is good at making a plan for a game. but he is bad at adjusting that plan based on game time situations. this explains to me that when things dont work well as he had hoped, his game time decisions dont make them better.

good article though. it will be fun (and a little frustrating maybe) to see how this team progresses. Im excited to see all these young guys grow up :)

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 22, 2010 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pistol formation

Could Texas run this formation with success? I say give it a chance with Fozzy and DJ!

by Longhorns84 on Sep 22, 2010 3:53 PM CDT reply actions  

The Pistol

Allows the QB to make quick throws and the RB to run “downhill” and choose holes to the left or right The problems would be the same for the Pistol as for the pro set Plus the Pistol works best if the QB runs Ala Kaepernick at Nevada.

by burnt in ny on Sep 22, 2010 5:27 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Alabama and pistol

Gameday last weekend showed Alabama running the pistol with Ingram (they went to Nevada this summer). Ingram could read the hole and make a sharper cut.

by texascfo on Sep 22, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mack Crazy Like A Fox

He knows the issues with the offense better than we do. His comments are crafted to send subtle messages and not throw his players under the bus. If he overreacted like us, he would not have a pipeline of blue chippers that extends to 2014 or 2015, and he would discourage the team. I heard him say that the players are trying, the players are talented, the coaches need to do better. I think he is right on all 3 counts.

Note to Bill Byrne "Because you aren´t Texas and you´ll never be Texas"

by realmccoy on Sep 22, 2010 4:25 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Maybe our next....

…OL coach will be able to recognize and adjust to Whitlock’s moves.

Good stuff regarding Mack’s attempts to pull down fan expectations. I hope the kids will have none of it.

--- All roads to the Big-XII Championship lead through OU/RRS. It's not just another game! We're all about championships here. ---

by HornChamps on Sep 22, 2010 4:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Great stuff

I would also add to the self-fulfilling prophecy and the red pill swallowing that when it is expected that the offense will be unsuccessful and the doubt grows stronger in the new schemes, confidence for GG and the rest of the offense will inevitably drop. Playing so conservatively shows Gilbert that we don’t think you’re ready yet. Same for the backs who we continue to be platooned with little resolve. “Get used to it” & “Did you really expect to score more?” become very disheartening to a team with as much talent and little confidence as we’re seeing. It is a snowball effect that can only be broken with gates being opened and trust being restored to take those outside zone sweeps for a ride every now and then.

by Infield Elephant on Sep 22, 2010 5:37 PM CDT reply actions  

Mack says not fair to take his tongue lashing of McWhorter out of context

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5604753

I’m glad Mack was giving him hell. They need to improve and Coach Brown should have been angry and let them know it.

I was annoyed as hell watching Turner Gill stand stone faced on the sidelines while his Jayhawks floundered around at the end of the game last week. He showed no emotion and wasn’t talking in his headset and all the while the clock was ticking away to their embarrassing defeat to Southern Miss. It was like he was watching the game on TV and he was giving no direction or heat to any of the coaches or players. I couldn’t believe the lack of emotion when his ship was sinking.

by Wrangler86 on Sep 22, 2010 5:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Tom Landry didn't show emotions on the sideline

he believed it gave the impression of calm and control, even when things were going poorly

I think Gill is of the same mind.

by Beergut on Sep 25, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great stuff...

I love witty humor intermingled with good, solid analytical data. Excellent work, sir.

"Stats are for losers. I like winning games." ~ Will Muschamp

"I always felt like, and I paid a price for it, that it didn't seem right for one guy to bring me down." ~ The Tyler Rose

by Mulliganville on Sep 22, 2010 7:50 PM CDT reply actions  

I wonder if Texas is stuck with GD for as long as the Mack daddy coaches? Would anyone here trade a mack retirement for a GD firing? Just stirring the pot.

On a GG note, i wonder if he is as ready as we thought after the MNC game. I was thinking about that game and all the big plays he made were to Ship, you know the guy that you could throw a football to as he wizzed by in an airplane, or was it a bass boat?, and he would catch it every time. perhaps ship just made GG look more starter ready than he is right now. that being said i totally believe he will be a stud i am just looking for other explanations for why it isnt happening right now, after all he is a Soph.

by dukeoforange on Sep 22, 2010 9:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Simple terms: too many variables not under control.

GG is just fine; his hot rod is not so hot at the moment. He’s dressed and ready to go downtown, but his rod can barely make it down the street.

WRT MNC, how about the pass to Malcolm? Right there. And that’s where we are in this movie.

by whills on Sep 22, 2010 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or the fans could take the blue pill and slide down the rabbit hole into the cold world of rebellion against Mack and the establishment for the rest of the season, constantly comparing the Horns to other teams ike Boise State, Oregon, or even, gasp, Nebraska, that seem to get much more out of their offensive talent.

The Longhorns offensive has not always been flashy over the last 12 years, but they get it done. I do think we need to come out ready to play and are currently lacking that lockroom leader on offense. On the other hand, I thank the football gods we are not Nebraska, Oregon or even Boise State. Let’s not forget the depths from which the cornhuskers have finally emerged from.

by DavidB64 on Sep 22, 2010 11:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I think Texas had a worse run from...

the second weekend of October 1984 to the end of 1997. Mired in the middle of the conference except for maybe three years of false hope. NEB’s slide was only really, what maybe 4 years? It looked a lot worse because the North sucked so bad when they were down. Could easily be the reason they were close to the top even in the down years. They did play for the MNC in 2001 when we blew it against CO (true they got their arses handed to them). I’d also say the VY offence was kinda flashy. Prior to that going back to Fred A, I agree.

"We are Texas. We always expect to be the best." - Sam Acho

by Bevoboy94 on Sep 23, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gotta agree with Spirit...

I have no problem with Brown and Davis’ conservatism on offense. Defense is going to win games for the ’Horns…at this point the greatest risk is this offense losing games trying to get too cute and giving the D a short field to defend.

The fixable things like execution problems need to be fixed and not excused due to youth/inexperience. That’s where the bad coaching comes in…not with the scheme, but in not correctling bad effort or execution errors. Referring to things like Williams and Davis dropping passes…Mitchell neglecting to cut block on a screen (even high school OTs know you don’t leave a defensive lineman standing in the lane your screen pass is going), those kinds of things.

by dkrandmack on Sep 23, 2010 8:50 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn