We’ve Got Issues: Longhorns Week 1
We headed into the season not knowing what to expect in a lot of areas. After Week 1, we're kind of in the same boat.
Last week we identified four key issues that we wanted to see worked out this season. Each week we will examine them and see how they've progressed (or regressed). Week 1 is in the books, so here's what we learned, and didn't learn.
Garrett Gilbert's Progress
Overall I thought the kid looked really good. He can fire it, for sure. The things he did poorly can all be fixed with experience - not stepping up in the pocket, better fakes on the play-action pass, not forcing the ball.
Gilbert showed good poise in an offense that served up three big scoops of vanilla Saturday. As promised, he was under center a ton, but the hurry-up offense was still in effect. Although it seemed to backfire at times, like at the end of the first drive when Texas was stuffed four times before you could blink.
Gilbert had two great passes that stood out to me-a deep middle pass to John Chiles in the second quarter and another deep ball to Malcolm Williams in the third quarter.
As expected for Week 1, Texas showed very little in the passing game. Gilbert rushed the play-action fake the few times it was run. If that is going to be a foundation of this offense, he must get better at that. Once he nails it, Gilbert's arm on the deep ball will be a dangerous weapon.
Gilbert looked good against Rice, but that's not saying much. It really didn't show a whole lot of progression, which is what we're concerned with here.
Retooling the Running Game
Cody Johnson started; Tre' Newton looked better. Uhm, yeah, same story there.
The single-back set dominated the run game, and as expected, it was jammed down our throats. Get used to that as the coaches force this thing to work. Johnson started off with big runs but wore down quickly, getting stuffed at the goal line early. His lack of top-end speed was evident. Newton is clearly the more dynamic back and the best all-around option we have. He gets the start against Wyoming, and we continue on the running back carousel.
Fozzy Whittaker showed some great moves, and had a decent per-carry average. The offensive line struggled at times to get good push against the Rice defensive line. Other times they opened some nice lanes. The lack of a fullback to knock out a linebacker hurts the inside game.
The new running game was stuck in neutral. Both Johnson and Newton had less than 4 yards per carry, and the overall running game tallied less than 200 yards. There will be growing pains for sure, and we're all going to have to fight through them. But I really believe it's a move in the right direction. Texas has the talent to break off 300 rushing yards a game, but the scheme may not be there for a while.
BROC (Big Receiver on Campus)
Hey, Marquise Goodwin is fast. He needs the ball more. He adjusted well on one pass and is electric in the open field, and by "open" I mean with defenders at least five yards away from him. That's all the space he needs.
Malcolm Williams used his size and exceeded expectations. I'm sure Gilbert appreciates his size out there. James Kirkendoll had just one catch for 5 yards. Chiles had the one big catch down the middle. Honestly, if Goodwin and Williams can consistently be the top two receivers on this team, that will be just fantastic.
Freshman Mike Davis got into the game but didn't have any catches. If you're like me, you hit the replay button on your DVR remote a couple times just to get a good look at him. He's a good one.
Again, we just didn't see much Saturday, and don't let that bother you. This thing has a lot of time to play out over the next few months. There will be a lot of ups and downs. The thing to look for is progress, which is the purpose of this column. Week 1 was a good starting point. This is the most talented position on the offense, so expectations for the pass catchers will remain high.
The D-Line Shuffle
Too bad this column doesn't include linebackers or defensive backs, or we'd spend a lot of time talking about Keenan Robinson and Kenny Vaccaro. But this issue is about the state of the D-line.
Two words: Sam Acho!
Sam Achooooooo!!! Yeah, he's really, really good. And he's even a better person. He sure is fun to cheer for. He came up big with four tackles, one sack and one forced fumble turned into a touchdown.
Overall the line showed its speed, but also allowed too many running lanes. And what was up with getting caught with their pants down against the zone read? The ZONE READ!?!? Thankfully they adjusted and pretty much swallowed it up in the second half.
Kheeston Randle looked good after an early injury scare. The freshmen Jackson Jeffcoat and Reggie Wilson both made plays, which was awesome to see. At one point Acho, Jeffcoat and Eddie Jones were on the line together.
Acho played end most of the time, which was comforting. This group still needs to improve against the run. Forget the stats from last year. Oklahoma, Kansas State and Oklahoma State are capable of running it all over the field.
Check back next week as we will have a better measuring stick for identifying progress. For now, leave your comments on how you think each issue progressed.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is Cody J The D-Line Meat Tenderizer?
I agree that Tre was terrific. His eyesight is excellent, and ability to adapt lane selection while still moving forward is great. I agree he looked better than Cody. But one thing struck me after the game: Did a 250lb beefy Cody Johnson help wear down the Rice D Line a bit, making it a tad easier for Tre? Rice was pretty jacked for this game and their D-line was reasonably quick initially. After getting pounded by our O-line plus Cody a few times, the Owls D-line might have been a half-step slower and thus left wider gaps for Tre (not taking anything away from Newton…he was great).
As sharp as Tre is, we haven’t really seen him take a pounding over the course of 4 quarters the way backs of real running teams do. We might be better served having Cody taking the initial reps to slow down the opponent’s D line and then let Newton come in with his quick feet. (sounds too obvious to actually be a Greg Davis strategy.)
OR
you could look at that idea the other way. Say we tire em out by having them chase Tre and Fozzy for three quarters, then punish them with Cody in the 4th.
"You never lose a game if the opponent doesn't score." - Darrell Royal
by BMC237 on Sep 7, 2010 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions
under 4 yds per carry
is not great IMO. Newton looked like a RB. Johnson did not. I think your best bet for a legit 1000 yd back is Whitaker. Course, I am still of the opinion that your running game will struggle until you change your RB coach.
GG
I don’t think anybody can use the Rice game to judge him. It was probably the furthest thing from what Texas is going to do against Big 12 teams.
I thought Eddie Jones was the best DE against Rice.
I am not a professional analyst or a statistician, but I thought GG looked a little rough.
How many passes did he skip off the turf, a la Steven McGee? How many times did he float that across-the-field lob to a receiver – a pass which will surely be pick-sixed by any semi-competent defense we face? These two things specifically concern me about his arm strength at this point. And the fact that he threw a laser to Chiles at the goal line only confuses me; clearly his arm is strong enough to pull it off – so how is he throwing bounce-passes and lobs?
On the experience and game-speed side of things, he seemed to throw to the wrong receiver a bunch. Either threw it long when guys were open underneath, or tried to force it underneath when guys were all alone downfield. It sure looked like a couple of the receivers were getting aggravated that they were wide open and not getting looks (just going by body language on the field).
I’m sure he’ll get better, but that’s what I saw on Saturday.
If the world was a school, we'd be homecoming king...
In college football, isn't it all about the SECOND game?
With no preseason, you can make few judgements based on the first game. Texas (and Okie and Florida) will be better next week. And it’s likely that others who romped in Week 1 will come back to earth a little.
41-38 !!
Speaking of Florida, did anyone else think Meyer was a total douchebag at the end of that game? They had a 14 point lead with 5 minutes to go and instead of punting they went for it on fourth and long twice to score a couple of meaningless touchdowns. Was he really that scared of dropping a little in the polls? Its not like UF isn’t going to be ranked in the top 5 if they go undefeated (or probably even if they lose in Tuscaloosa) in their first 8 games. Mack by contrast had the whole second string on the field with 10 minutes left in the game with a similarly insurmountable lead.
Yep
And they dropped 3 & 4 spots in each poll. So I think the pollsters noticed too.
"Well, a guy did a Horns down to him. You just shouldn’t do that."
Re:
Gilbert looked good against Rice, but that’s not saying much. It really didn’t show a whole lot of progression, which is what we’re concerned with here.
I think that’s to be expected with him being under center more.
Does anyone know where I can find a site that breaks down the plays by formation? Even a play by play that shows the set they are in would be helpful. I’m interested to know how the passing game faired statistically out of the shotgun vs. under center.
I think PB Is working on a post this week breaking down every play
To my knowledge, I’m not aware of any websites that do so. Greg Davis said yesterday that they were under center 62 or 63 snaps out of the 76 they ran, so I don’t think shotgun passing vs. under center passing will really reveal much this week. I would expect it to in the future, if not this Saturday against Wyoming, then against Texas Tech. From the sound of it, the Horns will probably be pretty vanilla again this week.
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 7, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
The sample size will obviously be small.
GG only threw the ball 23 times. That would likely leave us with close to a 50% split of throws from under center vs. out of the shotgun. It wouldn’t be conclusive, but I suspect that it would confirm what I saw from Reliant; GG was more effective/comfortable in the shotgun formation.
a bit off topic
my biggest concern watching that game was how little emotion Texas showed. With a team as talented as ours, the intangibles will always be key, and I didn’t see very inspired football for four quarters.
I think this is what VY’s team and Colt’s last two years were personified by: talent playing beyond the sum of their parts.
It’s early- I’m not hitting a panic button or anything, but I sure would like to see us drill someone 45-3 (which is what the Rice game score would have been with a little focus and inspiration).
I still can't believe Fred Akers went for the tie...
my biggest concern watching that game was how little emotion Texas showed.
They are young. That will come once everyone settles down.
"Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try."
- Yoda
by ElongatedHorn on Sep 9, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Jackson Jeffcoat
looked better against Rice than he has the past three years of HS.
I think Kirkendoll is a 3rd down, possession type WR. If it was me, I would have Goodwin and the freshmen starting. Shocked you guys did not throw to Matthews more.
Not sure about the JJ comment
But I kind of agree on the other stuff. Right now I like Chiles, Goodwin, and Malcolm, with the caveat that Davis and White actually play. Hales some as well. This is the game where we get to try stuff out with the young receivers, let’s, like, actually do it.

by 





























