Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

Nebraska Football 2010: Week One Review

I'll be tracking the Nebraska Cornhuskers each week of the season leading up to the big game in Lincoln -- and, perhaps, beyond, if a Big 12 Championship Game rematch looks likely. For more on the Huskers, head over to SB Nation's superb Nebraska blog, Corn Nation.

Admittedly, it's a little odd to be devoting so much attention to a single opponent, and one who doesn't even appear on the schedule until mid-October, at that. This is, of course, a Texas Longhorns blog, and we've barely spoken a word about Wyoming, this Saturday's upcoming opponent.

With that said, there are three reasons why I wanted to cover Nebraska on a weekly basis this year:

First, same as Oklahoma and Texas A&M, prior to the season it was easy to identify Nebraska as one of the three most interesting, down-the-road opponents likely to define Texas's 2010 season. The Huskers appear not only at a critical juncture of the schedule, but represent the consensus choice to win the Big 12 North.

Second, as saturated as is the coverage of our beloved Longhorns, there's meaningful value in this exercise. Between what we all see living and dying with every snap, in conjunction with the extensive coverage at BON, Barking Carnival, the Statesman, and message boards... if anything we wind up knowing too much about our own situation. At least in my view, some perspective helps, and in covering an opponent in depth it's not as though anyone's getting shortchanged their Longhorns coverage.  Meanwhile, the exercise not only illuminates an upcoming opponent but helps shed light on the evaluation of our own team.

Third and finally, there's a reasonable chance that Texas' trip to Lincoln will represent the regular season game of the year. Like last season -- when prior to Bradford and Gresham's injuries the Red River Shootout looked like an utterly epic showdown -- circumstances may neuter that possibility, but it is at least foreseeable that Texas and Nebraska could square off in Lincoln undefeated, with both teams ranked in the top five. Combined with everything else related to these two programs, should such a contest take shape, it would be one of the most impossibly exciting, contentious match ups in recent memory.

In other words, at a minimum Nebraska represents our toughest road game of the year and -- it seems likely -- a defining benchmark for the progress of this year's team. And depending what happens between now and then, it's possible that Texas at Nebraska will be the must-see game of the 2010 regular season. Oklahoma is still the most important game on the schedule, but if Texas manages to clear that hurdle along with all the rest in the early going, the trip to Lincoln could be a match up for the ages.

(Also, my DVR wasn't working in time to record the Texas game, but I got Nebraska on film.

Nebraska 49  Western Kentucky 10

For the most part, the Cornhuskers started their season the right way, with a 49-10 thumping of Western Kentucky in Lincoln. The game box score is here. Bo Pelini's post-game quotes are here. Corn Nation's post-game report card is here.

And after the jump, an in depth breakdown of Nebraska's performance in week one.

Star-divide

NEBRASKA OFFENSE

While heading into the game most Nebraska fans voiced their expectations that senior Zac Lee would be named the starter. I explained why I thought it would be the redshirt freshman, Taylor Martinez:

Nebraska's goals this season are, first, to get to 6-0, and second, to beat Texas in Lincoln. And just like Texas is betting the farm on Cody Johnson because of what it needs against the top defenses it will face, I'm wondering whether Nebraska's coaches aren't thinking about giving Taylor Martinez every chance to be the team's quarterback this year because of what they need to play Texas. (Think about why Jerrod Johnson made A&M such a tough out last season and you'll arrive at the same conclusion.)  Nebraska won't sacrifice an early-season loss to get there, but if they can get to 6-0 with Martinez, he may be the better play against the Longhorns. And that could be decisive.

The thing is that Martinez only has to be the equal of Zac Lee as a passer to be more valuable to the offense, because while Lee isn't immobile, he's not a rushing threat. Martinez most certainly is, and would meaningfully boost Nebraska's ground game, which will be the focal point of the offense in any case. That, combined with Lee's inability to win the job outright by now, suggest to me that Martinez will be given every chance to prove himself ready. Don't be surprised if he starts on Saturday.

Bo Pelini apparently agreed, as Martinez did in fact get the starting nod on Saturday. It would have been the right move even had the freshman struggled, but Martinez shone in exactly the ways that make him the Cornhuskers' best play for this season... and for beating Texas.

Quarterback -- The freshman finished the game completing 9 of 15 passes for 136 yards (no TDs or INTs), but he was dazzling on the ground, leading the team in rushing with 129 yards on just 7 carries, including 3 scores. We saw against Rice the reason I thought the Cornhuskers would and should go with Martinez, and as you can see, the zone read is his bread and butter:

Overall it was a spectacular debut for a redshirt freshman debut, giving Nebraska precisely what they needed: a rushing threat to diversify and make more dangerous the offensive attack. Martinez didn't look great as a passer, but he didn't need to, and most importantly, he didn't make any mistakes. Again, the bar here is a low one -- Martinez need only equal Lee as a passer to be a clearly better overall option. Martinez showed adequate arm strength, decent accuracy, and solid enough decision-making. He'll improve the latter two as the season progresses, and even though the opponent was truly terrible, after week one it's crystal clear the coaches made the right decision.

Running Backs -- Nebraska didn't feature the tailbacks much, but the top two -- Helu Jr. and Burkhead -- were both solid when they were in. I wrote in the season preview that the coaches would likely try to limit Helu Jr.'s carries against weaker opponents to keep him fresh for games in which he'll be leaned upon more heavily, and that appeared to be the strategy against the Hilltoppers. After all that patting myself on the back, it's only fair that I note that, at least after one week, I was dead wrong about Dontray Robinson perhaps sneaking past Rex Burkhead as the No. 2 tailback. Robinson picked up just 7 yards on 4 carries late in the game, while Burkhead was featured throughout and played well, picking up 57 yards on 5 carries (1 TD) and hauling in a pair of passes for another 47 yards. He's an excellent athlete, gets going in a hurry, and is a versatile threat who can be used in a lot of different ways. A really nice player to have.

Receivers -- I liked Brandon Kinnie to have a breakout season, and he was a factor in game one, hauling in a team-high six receptions for 59 yards. Other than a lost fumble, Niles Paul was typically strong, picking up 92 yards on just 5 catches, including one for a TD. For the most part, Martinez didn't really work through any progressions, targeting his top two receivers when he dropped back to pass, with the exception of a really nice, patient read in which he let Burkhead slip out of the backfield and hit him on a delay over the middle for a nice gain. This is likely to be the story for Nebraska all year, but I like both Paul and Kinnie enough not to see it as a problem. Look for Martinez to start working in the tight ends to the passing game as he gets more comfortable.

Offensive Line -- Western Kentucky's front presented absolutely no threat whatsoever, but there was more to like than not about the Nebraska offensive line. The guards Williams and Henry were good, and both Jones and Hardrick looked promising. It's hard to project too much given the opponent, but I thought the performance was encouraging, especially given the offense Nebraska is going to be running with Martinez. There's a lot of athleticism on this line, and they did an excellent job moving their feet well and giving Martinez time to make plays. Whether they can clear out and move a stout front remains to be seen, but the extra dimension Martinez adds as a rusher means they won't always have to for the Huskers to be successful.

NEBRASKA DEFENSE

If the Nebraska offense was better than expected, the defense was disappointing relative to expectations, giving up 4.8 yards per play and struggling to dominate Western Kentucky up front. That said, if one unit had to struggle while the other shined, better this than the alternative. Bo Pelini's defenses always improve as the year goes on, as will this one; far more important that the offense got off to a good start.

Defensive Line -- It's not saying much to say Jared Crick is no Ndamukong Suh, but... Nebraska fans expecting dominance even in the same zip code need to adjust expectations. Now, let's be clear about this: Crick is a good tackle. He's got great strength and above average quickness. But as I wrote in the preview, the critical questions were (1) how much he benefited from playing alongside Suh, (2) whether Crick could be similarly effective against double teams, and (3) whether his second tackle would be as helpful to him as he was to Ndamukong Suh.  And at least after one game my answers are: (1) a lot, (2) not even close, and (3) not yet.

Crick was his usual excellent self when blocked one-on-one, but he struggled to separate from double teams and become a disruptive presence. He's strong enough that he can power through, and quick enough to avoid getting locked up, but my perception is that he lacks the agility to control double teams as the high-elites do. He's excellent enough to warrant extra attention, but whereas Suh was able to be disruptive even when doubled, Crick's value is tied more to his ability to occupy two blockers.

To the extent that's correct, heading into this season Nebraska was looking for sophomore Baker Steinkuhler to take a similarly big step forward as Crick did last year. To be sure, the sheer magnitude of Steinkuhler's physical presence presents problems all its own, but as I wrote in the season preview, "he's got a lot to prove, and the long-armed prospect still played too upright last year."  Based on his week one performance, while his promise is still considerably higher, Steinkuhler still looks to me more physical specimen than effective tackle.

As for the ends, Pierre Allen and Cameron Meredith got the majority of the first team snaps before Meredith left with injury. Both were adequate, but neither stood out as a difference maker, nor did anyone behind them on the depth start. That was the story of the defensive line, really: if the first game is any indication, this unit is solid, but may lack difference-making potential. Good, not great.

Linebackers -- Shifting to more positive news, Lavonte David was every bit as impressive as his hype suggested he could be, showing superior quickness and a tenacious nose for the ball in racking up 13 tackles on the evening. He's definitely still a bit raw around the edges -- his overaggressive play on a 3rd and 1 allowed the WKU tailback to sprint free for a 46 yard gain that should have scored 6 -- but his weaknesses are of the kind that can and will improve in-season under Pelini's tutelage. In any event, he was the most impressive player on the defense.  With Compton and Fisher out injured, sophomore Alonzo Whaley gave the Huskers solid snaps at the Will position, flashing really nice speed that will play well in their scheme as he improves his mental understanding of what's happening in front of him and his role within it.

Secondary -- I flagged the safety position as a question mark heading into the season, and neither Rickey Thenarse nor Eric Hagg impressed me on Saturday. However, converted corner DeJon Gomes very much did (his goal line strip was brilliant), an important development that portends well for the rest of the season. Similar to Texas with Gideon, Scott, and Vaccaro, Nebraska just needs two to emerge as playmakers, and based on what I saw from Gomes, at a minimum I like Nebraska to be fine. 

Remember, thanks to the otherworldly abilities of the Huskers' corners -- Prince Amukumara and Alfonzo Dennard -- the safeties' most important responsibilities relate to playing smart and physical run support defense. That's a far more developable, coachable skill than being a sideline-to-sideline menace to the air game (a la Earl Thomas), making the outlook here bright enough. An injury to one of the star corners changes the dynamics significantly, but so long as they're healthy, the situation at safety looks good enough, and will continue to get better.

CONCLUSION

I suppose total dominance would be preferable, but again: if there had to be disappointment on one side of the ball, Nebraska fans should be happy with the win over Western Kentucky. Yes, the defense looks like it might be a notch below last year's, and has a good deal of work to do, but there are good reasons to think believe in improvement, while disaster on offense would have cast a much more ominous shadow.

In that light, I think the debut of Martinez is the storyline of greatest importance, and while his development will be critical to the Huskers achieving their highest goals, his debut was more than encouraging in terms of validating Nebraska's top-end potential. As for the defense, my sense after one game is that this group has little-to-no chance to be as dominant as last year's, but... with every reason to expect meaningful improvement, it's not unreasonable to believe that the defense "merely" will develop into a very good group.

If that's right, the offense needn't be world-beaters for Nebraska to have a shot at an undefeated season. They'll need only to be potent, and by starting Martinez the coaches have given themselves the best chance of achieving that goal. If things break right, Nebraska is capable of contending for the conference (and possibly national) title. That's all you can really ask for.

Looking ahead, Nebraska hosts the explosive offense of Idaho on Saturday, in a game which should be both interesting and telling on a number of levels. The Vandals are a pass-dependent offense who will face a challenge from the corners unlike anything they've seen before, giving us observers a chance to see whether the rest of Nebraska's defense is capable of taking advantage. It'll be a bad sign for Nebraska if Crick and Steinkuhler struggle to create pressure, if NU's defensive ends don't get at least a half dozen good licks of the quarterback, and if the safeties look bad in coverage. Likewise, it'll be a bad omen if Martinez and Nebraska don't rack up big yardage against another subpar defense.

Most interesting to me is the match up of the Nebraska defense against the Idaho offense -- a spread-'em-out, wide-open attack not dissimilar to Texas' last year under Colt McCoy. If the Huskers struggle to slow Idaho down, we'll have an interesting, useful data point with which to compare this and last year's defenses.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

And thats why I love this site

the aggies are braying about beating down a d2 team, while okie is focused solely on Florida st.

This site offers a wyoming preview(out of kindness) and still gives us some perspective on upcoming threats. Thanks for all you do PB.

by GoComets! on Sep 9, 2010 12:54 AM CDT reply actions  

Very well Written!

by miketag on Sep 9, 2010 2:28 AM CDT reply actions  

a Husker friend I talk to

said Nebraska has committed to running the spread option ala Oregon and Chip Kelly.

It will be interesting to see how Martinez develops as a passer in that scheme.

Good review of their defense. What you pointed out echoed the concerns I heard after their game.

by Beergut on Sep 9, 2010 2:37 AM CDT reply actions  

do they really have the personnel to run the spread?

Talent-wise? I have a hard time seeing the Huskers being successful in the spread.

Although I suppose any offense is better than their previous status of no offense.

Never ask a man if he's from Texas. If he is, he'll tell you soon enough. If he's not, don't embarrass him.

by LonghornEm on Sep 9, 2010 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

what personnel

beyond a mobile quarterback are needed to run the spread…. that are really that different from any other offense?

I think we spent too much time thinking about this stuff. The QB has to make the reads (be smart) and be mobile. Everyone else – just needs to do what they’d normally do. Catch the ball when it’s thrown, block when it’s called for, and not make stupid mistakes (holding, hitting after the play, etc).

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Sep 9, 2010 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's a pertinent question

There are real differences between personnel besides a mobile QB. Heck, we’ve spent a lot of time here debating whether or not our O-line was better suited for the schemes we were running last year or the downhill scheme this year. It matters with runningbacks too. Cody Johnson can fit in the latter offense; he seems a tad out of place in the former.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

y'all really didn't have the o-line

for any running scheme last year, downhill or zone

true, part of your problem is the lack of a bonafide star back who can turn some of the OL mistakes into chicken salad, but your OL is the major culprit in the lack of a running game the last two years

this stuff about shotgun vs. under is just window dressing

by Beergut on Sep 9, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree to some extent

My point was not that our O-line would have been world-beaters in a different scheme (I doubt it) but that many people felt it would have been better in another. Regardless if that was actually true, the point is that a lot more matters in running the spread than a mobile QB.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

but

I think the difference is that Texas eliminated themselves from running any kinds of heavy sets, right? (No fullback, no heavy, run-blocking TEs).

Nebraska isn’t going to commit to an Oregon-based spread fully – they’re not going to completely sacrifice being able to line up heavy and run power football, and I think that’s the difference between our schools.

Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com

by Jon Johnston on Sep 9, 2010 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's important

To have RBs who are fast enough to get upfield quickly and quick enough to avoid large TFLs in the backfield. Burkhead…maybe. Helu…not in a million years. Guy was built for the I formation.

by GoHornsGo90 on Sep 9, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

to answer your question

yes

This wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment decision, this was something that I suspect was in the works when Pelini was hired. Never underestimate the love for the option game in Nebraska, and with a passing game already in place because of Callahan error (not a typo), the spread option gives them the best of both worlds.

by Beergut on Sep 9, 2010 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

The best case scenario *IMO*

is if Martinez continues to efficiently run the offense, and Nebraska romps past KSU, giving them a 6-0 record, a top 10 (possibly 5) ranking, and solid momentum. I can’t wait to see what hell is unleashed if Texas is being told that they are the underdog in that game.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Sep 9, 2010 3:01 AM CDT reply actions  

I doubt they jump us unless we notch a loss somewhere

Nebraska’s SoS leading up to the Texas game is laughable, while Texas takes on Wyoming/TT/UCLA/OU all in a row.

by notsofst on Sep 9, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Couple thoughts

1) Terrific write-up. I admit I was wondering where this was going if we were to see a weekly Husker post, but I am now excited.

2) Here’s the Nebraska v. Idaho depth chart. I found it useful in reading through this.

3) Although you called it, I’m surprised to see BP take this approach:

On what a running quarterback brings to the offense and what it does to a defense: “That’s why we’re doing it. We try to be really multiple, make it hard on the defense, make them account for everybody. Obviously to do that in the run game, the quarterback is a big part of it.”

Then again, given the [lack of] offense in ‘09, this makes sense. I’m trying to think of the last time we faced a truly mobile QB threat…

by Infield Elephant on Sep 9, 2010 8:59 AM CDT reply actions  

cool dog

I would have say Colt Mccoy or VY in practice to answer the last question because I’m drawing a blank also on some one that had wheels that we played.

by cpabis on Sep 9, 2010 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

ah

I was sitting here thinking what does he mean by “cool dog”. Was it like “cool, dog”? Was it sarcastic? But thanks, he’s geared up.

by Infield Elephant on Sep 9, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

A couple of QB's

from Husker past would have been Eric Crouch, Jamal Lord, and Tommy Frasier. But (off the top of my head) not sure of years they would have played Texas in our two year on/off schedule. not sure if that answers any questions or is even interesting to you both. As for the article, loved it and can’t wait to see the NU/UT game……regardless of outcome. Just glad we can start competing again! GBR!

by Huskerinthedesert on Sep 10, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just FYI

Infield Elephant’s comments were a reference to getting torn apart by the last true mobile QB UT faced, Jerrod Johnson.

by Horncasting on Sep 10, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Nebraska's going to look good against inferior opponents leading up to the Texas game, but we won't know if they really have teeth until we play them

Compare this ( last year’s wins ):
Western Kentucky (0)
Idaho (7, bowl loss to Clemson)
Washington (5)
South Dakota State ( FCS – 8 )
Kansas State ( 6 )

To this ( last year’s wins ):
Rice (2)
Wyoming (7, bowl win over Fresno State)
Texas Tech (9, bowl win over Michigan State)
UCLA (7, bowl win over Temple)
Oklahoma (8, bowl win over Stanford)

We play 0 FCS teams, 4 bowl winners, and 3 BCS teams.
Nebraska is playing 1 FCS team, 0 bowl winners, and 2 BCS teams.

I think Nebraska’s games against Washington and Kansas State will be telling, so pay close attention to those contests.

by notsofst on Sep 9, 2010 10:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Didn't realize how bad WKU really was

Until watching the replay at lunch today and the announcer said they had lost 20 straight games.

by Horncasting on Sep 9, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, they're basically still an FCS team

So make that two FCS teams, and one potentially winless BCS team, and Kansas State.

by notsofst on Sep 9, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really dont get why we care about Nebraska at this time...

… I understand all the hype by the ESPN guys because its an ABC game, but we as fans need to understand there are a bunch of important games before that. Is the Neb game bigger than the OU game? I think not! is it more important than Tech, not right now!
We need to make sure we dont look out too ahead, and end up falling over something small right in front of us…
Write about Wyoming and give us some real information that other outlets like ESPN cant. What to expect, who to lookout for, what schemes to look at, etc etc? this would be a good contribution to the Horn nation.
This stupid cornhusker obsession has to stop. Just because the idiot huskers are delusional right now, and think they are great, do we have to respond to their fantasies? For god’s sakes, I’ll really start worrying about them when they have actually beaten us a yr or two. Till then, OU is the biggest game, period!

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 9, 2010 10:36 AM CDT reply actions  

Hey... we're fans

We can look ahead all we want. It’s the players that have to concentrate on the next game.

And this:

Second, as saturated as is the coverage of our beloved Longhorns, there’s meaningful value in this exercise. Between what we all see living and dying with every snap, in conjunction with the extensive coverage at BON, Barking Carnival, the Statesman, and message boards… if anything we wind up knowing too much about our own situation. At least in my view, some perspective helps, and in covering an opponent in depth it’s not as though anyone’s getting shortchanged their Longhorns coverage. Meanwhile, the exercise not only illuminates an upcoming opponent but helps shed light on the evaluation of our own team.

by notsofst on Sep 9, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

i would agree with this but...

1. players read this too, if anything, they are fans too, fans who play! what fans obsess about, they obsess about. thus the logic that we can look ahead and it has no effect on the team is wishful thinking. i really dont mean any disrespect, you can think as you do and most people do, i just think that with a weaker, younger team and lack of experience on key positions, the strategy of looking ahead can be counter productive. if in a perfect world where fan opinion has no effect on the team, i really wouldnt care enough to say what i said
2. i agree its fine to look to future competitions, but every freaking week, come on, thats crazy and just cements my point of looking too far ahead and potentially screwing the job at hand this saturday or the next one…
again, im saying this with respect to people’s opinion.

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 9, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

to reiterate point 2..

..i meant looking every week at the same opponent, thats ridiculous IMHO, thats what i think is counterproductive…

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 9, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the feedback

Obviously, I disagree, but your thoughts are noted and appreciated.

Personally, I view this a lot differently, and I can assure you that this blog has no influence over how the team prepares for each week’s opponents.

As for whether it’s worthwhile for fans to read, the feedback I’ve received in my inbox tells me the series is much appreciated. As others have suggested, you don’t have to read these if they don’t seem worth your time.

Thanks! PB

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Sep 10, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wait, what?
I can assure you that this blog has no influence over how the team prepares for each week’s opponents

[sigh]

by Infield Elephant on Sep 10, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for your effort...

… disagreement aside, I appreciate your effort of working on the column as I do with the whole staff here.
I think its easier to criticize than to step up and do something…I’ll put myself in the category of people who criticize…
I’ll keep my mouth shut in the future :)
Thanks!

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 10, 2010 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see what's wrong

With looking at upcoming opponents, especially ones we know will be big contests. A lot of blogs, for example, even run through the entire schedule during the preseason and discuss each opponent (Rock M Nation is an example). This is not “looking ahead” but “being informed.” We’re Texas fans but we’re also college football fans, so we care about the overall narrative of the season.

Also, we aren’t coaches or players. Even if we are “looking ahead” (and we’re not), that doesn’t make an ounce of difference on the team. As a fan, I’m looking forward to playing USC, but that’s obviously not a concern for the current players. Also, consider this: Do you not think that the coaches don’t know what the important games are? They treated Rice like a glorified scrimmage. They will probably try a little harder against Wyoming but still won’t tip their hand. If they didn’t think some games were more important than others, they wouldn’t do stuff like that.

This is not restricted to Nebraska either. Last year we discussed OU and OSU as potentially big games; this season we’re talking about OU, OSU, and A&M. Tech comes early and we’ll talk about them when the time comes (which will be… next week). This kind of information is great for Horn nation because it gives us a wide perspective of what’s going on in college football, which also helps us evaluate where are team stands in the grand scheme of things.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

More fail on my part

We’re obviously not doing Oklahoma State anymore but Nebraska… which is what this thread is about.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think you addressed 75% of the things I said

However, if you really dislike what we’re doing, that’s fine. Nobody is going to force you to read it. And we’ll take it as a compliment that you think all the players read this blog :). Maybe we can hope Greg Davis does too.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

...

your first paragraph: lots of media looks at whole season outlook/review, whats wrong when we do it?
my answer: its fine to look at whole season outlook, etc. but focusing on one opponent and writing a column on it every week is what i have a problem with (addressed in point 2 above)

your second paragraph: we’re fans, we can do whatever, its the team that matters
my answer: players are affected by fan opinion, esp when they are young. so it can do harm in making team focus at the job at hand (addressed in point 1 above)

your third paragraph: we did it last year so it makes it perfectly fine to do it this year
my answer: im hewer here so dont know the trend from last yr. but i guess things might be a little different to since th team is younger and weaker now so focus is much more important because of lack of experience (maybe i didnt answer this directly, but i mentioned the main point in point 1 again)

by my math (which should be good since i got a degree in theoretical math at UT), my last comment addressed more than 75% of your comments…

I understand you can do whatever, and I can always just not click or read. Perfectly fair and I cant argue with that.
I just left a comment of what my opinion was in the hope it might make you think about this…

by vanterminatorhorn on Sep 9, 2010 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

rec'd

why spend your time on the internet talking about how a completely relevant, well researched and well written post on a sports blog isn’t worth writing/reading? The alternative is that this post simply doesn’t exist, and I don’t see how that is preferable.

If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by circa1015 on Sep 10, 2010 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great post, PB

Certainly put mine on Oklahoma to shame.

At the least, I think Dravannti Johnson will know not to bite on the zone read by the time we face the Huskers.

by TheElusiveShadow on Sep 9, 2010 11:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Ditto - nice summary

Incidentally,I thought Gomes was the guy that really shut down Texas in the Big12CG last year, despite all the sacks and coverage by the cornerbacks. Nebraska put 6 or 7 DB’s on the field, and Gomes was always the guy in the hole stuffing the run, which allowed Nebraska to stone runs off the edge with just five players in the box. I’ve been amazed at the lack of pre-season press he’s received. After Suh and Amasakare, I thought he was Big Red’s best defensive player.

There are many reasons for the development of downhill running by the Horns this year, but one is to put LB’s back on the field and get safeties like Gomes either off the field or 10 yards behind the line of scrimmage.

by burnt in ny on Sep 9, 2010 1:54 PM CDT reply actions  

you met beyond, right?
10 yards behind the line of scrimmage.

That would be a lotta TFLs.

Alabama also played dime against texas in the BCSCG.

by Beergut on Sep 9, 2010 4:16 PM CDT reply actions  

you meant "meant", right?

…you also meant “Texas” right?

by vy til i die on Sep 9, 2010 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

you shouldn't need a&m after Texas

to be able to capitalize the name of the state you live in. That’s so childish and petty. I know it’s what you think you should do because you’re a big bad aggie, but seriously, it just makes you look like you suck at simple grammar.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Sep 10, 2010 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Cornholers are crybabies!

OMG quit your crying and whining it is so evident you could never win the Big 12 Title so go play in the Big Ten where you will get your corn holer ass kicked there. Still crying about the one second on the clock, we kicked your ass for the first Big 12 title and beat you last year, I hope the horns kick the living crap out of those crybabies in your backyard, go to the Big Ten and good riddance!

by Clint Huffman on Sep 10, 2010 8:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Who is this even directed towards?

It’s posts like this that make all Longhorn fans look bad. You show that you have no idea what the hell you’re talking about here. NU is coming back to being a powerhouse team under Pelini and was dominant for years.

If you can’t be nice or can’t display that you know what you’re talking about, you should hold back on hitting the post button.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Sep 10, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wow.

Stay classy there, Clint Huffman.

by billdo463 on Sep 10, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

On another note

For those of you who read the Nebraska “Corn Nation” take on the game: is that not the most objective fan base you’ve ever seen? Damn those guys know how to put a game in perspective.

by GoHornsGo90 on Sep 10, 2010 11:58 AM CDT reply actions  

Sorry You are Right...

 Sorry I let a CornHusker fan get under my skin, I do have more class than that, my bad. We will be the better person on this one.

by Clint Huffman on Sep 10, 2010 12:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Don't worry,

we have our fair share of fans that get a little heated too (and fair share of bad apples for that matter). I’m just stoked that CFB is back, and that the Huskers are actually a viable threat again……..not “Back” but at least we can compete!

As for the Big 10 move……never really got an invite asking my opinion…lol….but it is what it is. Gotta still love my Huskers (it’s the only thing we got to root for, so can you blame us?) Good luck Horn Nation……no matter the outcome!

Thanks for the Read PB……..just one more thing getting me through my day before a football filled weekend and the Lake.

by Huskerinthedesert on Sep 10, 2010 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wow.

Even when you apologize, you are still arrogant, sir.
“We will be the better person”

{eye roll}

by billdo463 on Sep 10, 2010 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great Article!

This is by far the best Texas blog I have read.
Kudos for the excellent analysis/writing, guys.

by billdo463 on Sep 10, 2010 4:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tabasco-gallon-jugs-9_small
Happy NSD Aggies!!!!
Jersey_front_small
A Recruiting Reminder

Recent FanPosts

Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
Early Predictions for Fall Depth Chart (Offense)
Photo_57_small
Y'all Can Still Call Me GoBR
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
To Shirt or Not to Shirt? (Defense)
Photo_on_11-10-11_at_6
To Shirt or Not to Shirt? (Offense)
Vince_young_small
longhorn network
Small
Quick ? About the JUCO Guys...?
Small
If you were the head coach how would you recruit?
Small
Dear Santa, (re: DGB)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Photo_57_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Whataburger_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8