Understanding Rick Barnes' Texas Basketball Offense: The 1-4
Most Texas basketball fans know by now that Rick Barnes worked with Hall of Fame coach Jerry Sloan to revamp his offense prior to the 2010-2011 season. In a previous post, I started to explain how Barnes' implementation of the Utah Jazz offense works. I focused on a single set that contains many options, the Flex. In the 2010-2011 basketball season, the Texas Longhorns ran this Flex set frequently. But they also ran an additional set quite often. For the purposes of this article, I am calling this set the 1-4. It is a key component of Jerry Sloan's system.
Flex cuts, as well as staggered screens form the core of the 1-4 set. Built on Flex the principles, this 1-4 set is versatile and loaded with options. I am sure there are many elements of it that I have missed in my study. Let's dive in and hit some of the high points after the jump.
This set is called the 1-4 because of the initial configuration of the players on the court. The photo below shows how things start off. The point guard has the ball on top (he is the "1"). There are two players on the wings and two players at the elbows (these are the "4").
While the offense starts out in this 1-4 alignment, it doesn't stay in that alignment for long. The point guard has multiple options, which I will get to in a moment. Before I do that, I want to point out that each of these options is basically taking us to the configuration shown in the diagram below. From the configuration diagrammed below, the play will continue with either a Flex cut followed by a "pick for the picker," or a staggered screen.
From what I can tell studying videos of the team, the point guard has three options at the start of the 1-4 set. The point guard can: (1) pass the ball to the wing, (2) dribble the ball towards one of the wing players, or (3) pass the ball into the high post. Following each option will take the offense down a somewhat different path. Let's break down some of what can happen in each of the three options.
Option 1: pass to the wing
After the point guard makes the pass to the wing, we find ourselves in the position illustrated in the photo below. After passing to the wing, the point guard (Balbay) will cut to the basket while attempting to run his man off of a high post screen. This particular maneuver is famous enough to have its own name -- the UCLA cut. John Wooden used this cut -- along with the Pyramid of Success, a nasty full-court pressing defense, and some of the greatest big men of all time -- to dominate college basketball during the sixties and seventies. It turns out that modern man to man defense has a pretty good answer for this particular back screen and cut. It plays the role here of being a nuisance screen, occupying defenders and giving the defense one more thing to worry about. While this cut is taking place, the two players on the weak side are also repositioning.
In the next photo, a lot is going on. After setting the back screen for the point guard, the high post player (Gary Johnson) pops out to receive a pass. That puts us in the configuration that I diagrammed near the beginning of this article. Texas is following the "Flex cut" path from that diagram. The point guard (Balbay) is preparing to screen across the lane for the wing player (Jordan Hamilton). Hamilton is going to read this screen in a very similar manner to how he reads it in the Flex set that Texas runs, but we will get to his read in a couple of paragraphs. The other post player (Tristan Thompson) is also preparing to set a screen, either for Hamilton (depending on how Hamilton reads the play) or Balbay.
In my previous article on the Flex, I described how Barnes didn't use the pick for the picker down screen element in the set that I analyzed, and tried to rationalize why this was.
As I said above, the down screen pick for the picker is very hard to defend. But not every Flex coach uses it. In fact, one of the most well-known Flex practitioners, retired Maryland coach Gary Williams, does not really like to use the down screen. This down screen often results in a mid-range shot, whereas Williams prefers to work the ball inside. Additionally, in Texas' case last year, this down screen would have often taken Tristan Thompson or Gary Johnson away from the basket if Texas had been setting this screen. Rick Barnes' has historically gotten much of his offense on rebounds. The down screen takes one of the best offensive rebounders on the court out of good rebounding position. And while Texas gives up the pick for the picker, the rest of this set will look quite nice when we see some of the other options below.
It turns out, that while Barnes dropped the pick for the picker in his Flex set, he is keeping it in his 1-4 set. Let's look at the same photo again, shown below. In this case, the big man (Tristan) is setting the down screen, rather than (potentially) receiving it. Setting that down screen isn't going to pull him away from the rim, and the man coming off the down screen (after Hamilton clears the Flex cut) will be a guard. So the pick for the picker is not banished from Barnes' offense, it just isn't in what I am calling his "Flex" set.
Before we continue on with this play, I want you to notice the similarities between the photo above, and what is happening below in the excerpt drawn from my Jazz staggered screen article.
Now, the magic happens. I have drawn yellow lines in the photo below to show where the weak side wing and weak side post players will go to set their staggered screen. Success from this point on will require that all five players on the court read the play properly, and react to each other and the defense. While this sounds hard, it doesn't really have to be, as we will see below.
In the Texas Longhorn play that I am breaking down, the point guard sets a screen for a wing player coming off of the Flex cut. But with a simple adjustment via play call, this set could just as easily be run for the point guard to come off a staggered screen set by the wing and post players, as the Jazz used to run for Deron Williams. In other words, the set could be made to follow the staggered screen path in the diagram from the beginning of this article.
Anyway, let's get back to the Texas set that I am breaking down. In the photo below Balbay is setting a nice screen for Hamilton. Hamilton's defender is following him through the screen rather than attempting to beat him through it, so Hamilton makes the Flex cut. This is exactly the same read that we see in Texas' Flex set. You can watch the entire play here. You will also notice that Tristan is setting a screen for Balbay, creating the pick for the picker action.
As is typical on a Flex cut, the wing player is reading his defender as he prepares to make the cut. The photo below is taken from the same set run at a different point in the game. I have again labeled Hamilton and his defender with yellow arrows as Balbay prepares to set his screen. This time, it appears that Hamilton thinks his defender will be able to fight around Balbay's screen, so instead he uses Tristan Thompson's screen and pops out to the wing. I don't know if Hamilton was quite patient enough here. He doesn't give Balbay much of a chance to set his screen (he never really finds out if the defender will try to beat him through it), and he doesn't really set his defender up all that well for Tristan's pick. But at least this gives us an idea that the options on the Flex cut out of the 1-4 are pretty similar to the Flex set. You can watch the full play here. A lot more happens in that video clip, but we will save breaking down the options after a post entry pass in this offense for another day.
Option 2: dribble the ball towards the wing
Let's reset the 1-4 set, and look at the second option for the point guard. In the photo below, Balbay is the point guard and has the ball. He is dribbling toward J'Covan Brown on the wing, and signaling to him that he is heading his direction.
In the photo below, Balbay has the ball at the wing, and is preparing to pass the ball to the player at the high post. J'Covan is now under the basket, and preparing to work through the staggered screen being set up on the opposite side of the floor. We are now again at the configuration from the diagram near the top of this article. This time, Texas will be following the staggered screen path. Rather than again describing all of the reads possible on this play, you can read my earlier post on the Jazz staggered screen play. J'Covan's man follows him under the screen, J'Covan curls, and he ends up with a wide open three. You can watch the full play here. The play is wonderfully executed. Notice how J'Covan hesitates just a second under the basket and gives the screen time to set up.
Option 3: pass the ball to the high post
If you study video of the Utah Jazz when Sloan was their coach, you will find that they have a great series of cuts and screens that occur after a high post entry pass in the 1-4. Texas does some of this as well. In some cases, such as this clip, the offense sets a staggered screen of the sort I have already described. But I also found an example where the offense played things a bit differently. Let's reset with the 1-4 setup in the image below. The point guard has the ball. He is preparing to make the high post entry pass to Matt Hill.
In the next photo below, Matt Hill now has the ball at the high post (labeled with a yellow arrow). The wing player on the ball side cuts to the basket, while the opposite side post player rolls to the basket and prepares to set a down screen. The point guard moves to the wing. Hamilton on the opposite wing seems to be hanging out, but he is actually getting ready to set his man up and get an open shot.
In the next photo, we see Hamilton breaking for a hand-off from Matt Hill. We also see the down screen. Hamilton does a nice job of setting up his man and using the hand-off to get his shot. You can watch the whole play here.
I am not sure what triggers Hamilton to take this hand-off, rather than screening down with Tristan to set up a staggered screen. He is probably given the option to go either way on this play. Anyway, any play that results in a wide open three for Hamilton is a pretty good play.
Summary
I hope that my last couple of posts have given you a better flavor for the Texas offense. The offense is nice because while it has several different sets, they are based on the same few elements. These elements (the Flex cut and the staggered screen) are rock solid things upon which to base an offense. They can be practiced over and over. And once a player learns how to read the a particular screen in one set, it is easily translated to another set.
15 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice post
As always Reggieball. Looking forward to the start of the season. Coming up soon…
by hornshoops on Oct 12, 2011 6:06 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
I'm the first to admit that I cannot follow basketball playcalling
It all just happens so fast; I suppose this is the idea. Great breakdown, though, it’s nice to see these things slowed down and diagrammed. It seems like basketball commentators don’t do as good a job of this as football ones.
Now, to the action. It seems like one thing that matters a lot is that players learn to use their picks (i.e., what TT failed to do correctly in play 1). Do you think this is a problem endemic to freshman who, in high school, basically were the entire offense? Thompson probably never needed picks to be set for him, and so probably never cared to learn how to use them. I’m extrapolating a lot from a handful of plays, but I’m hoping you’ll be able to throw more insight onto this question.
Beyond that, how do you think our offense changes with a playmaking point guard like Myck Kabongo taking the reins? From the above examples (and from a lot of what I recall last year) the PG position was used more as a beer maid to get the ball safely up the court, after which either Balbay was a slasher or (barring a few select games) Brown was a spot up shooter. Neither really played the classic point guard role particularly well. I’m curious to see what we do with Kabongo.
Great post, by the way; keep em coming.
Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 12, 2011 8:36 AM CDT reply actions
Fire Mack Brown!!11!
Sorry, I thought this was another meltdown thread.
Having played basketball for a very few really great teaching-coaches and many really terrible ones, I’d say that it’s easy to reach the college level with glaring holes in your fundamentals. Even if you know there are certain basic things you should do, if it isn’t a coaching point of emphasis (often meaning you get pulled and chewed out if you fail to do it in a game) it’s unlikely to change. It’s some combination of lack of knowledge, poor habits, and lack of motivation. That doesn’t mean that TT is unmotivated or lazy, just that his coaches may not have given proper incentive to use his picks better.
Try to count how many times in an NBA – if they ever play again – or college game where an unblocked out man gets an offensive rebound while 2 or 3 defenders stand staring at the ball without ever putting a body on somebody. You’ll run out of fingers and toes before halftime.
In short and in terms of fundamentals of basketball, coaching sucks at all levels.
by bevosbackside on Oct 12, 2011 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions
There was a really nice article in ESPN the magazine a few months ago talking about this.
Namely, the undisciplined nature of the current NBA, and how European players/coaches are shocked by it when they first start playing here. It was written by an anonymous NBA player, and was really interesting to read.
If this (and what you say) is true, does it mean that it just doesn’t matter to have good fundamentals? Because if it did, wouldn’t an NBA team succeed with average players with solid fundamentals? That doesn’t seem to happen.
Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.
by pleaseplaykindle on Oct 12, 2011 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions
The state of fundamentals
My own view on this is that things haven’t really gotten much worse in my basketball watching and playing lifetime. Granted, I am 35, so this doesn’t go way back, but I don’t thing players are less fundamentally sound than they used to be. Guys coming out of high school to D-I don’t seem less sound fundamentally than the guys I played against in high school and AAU 15-20 years ago.
I don’t want to make too much of the one Hamilton play where he didn’t really set up his screen. It was one out of a number of plays that I watched. Hamilton wasn’t always the best at coming off screens, but on the whole he was pretty good in what I watched.
Some of this is possibly the learning curve with this offense for Rick Barnes. It is going to take him some time to learn how to really teach it. Most coaches spend years working with a single system of offense. Over time, they really develop a feel with out to teach it. With any offense, it often comes down to getting the details right, and coming up with the right drills to teach those details. Setting up the screens, where to make the cut to, the timing, etc. Barnes will get this stuff figured out.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Playmaking point guard
I think this offense will do well with a playmaking point guard, simply because it has been field tested with a couple of them (Stockton and Deron Williams). The sets can be tweaked a little to make it work for them. In my study, it seems that most of it last year was really run for Hamilton. But you can emphasize any of the 5 positions from the same basic framework.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Not to sidetrack from the article,
but Sam Gilbert may have been a key to UCLA’s success.
I don't know that I want to go there
You may have a point. I am focused on on the court stuff.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
thanks espn and aau
backside, you’re correct. In the dark ages, you either knew the fundamentls or you sat on the bench. ESPN and AAU took care of that. I have another example. Watch a game at any level and watch how the offensive player uses a screen and how a defender defends against the screen. Its really sad.
Gilbert was a key to UCLA’s success but Wooden knew how to coach.
A modest defense of AAU
When I was learning the game, AAU was not quite as big as it is now, but it was out there. And I really learned to play in AAU. I had a very good coach, so maybe I was lucky, but I wouldn’t have been half the player that I was without AAU ball. (Not that I was anything particularly special, but you get the point.)
And AAU summer ball as a high school player was certainly a higher level of competition than the high school league, if less structured. I seldom went up against D-I caliber opponents on my high school team, but in AAU I regularly did. Had to defend guys who were 7 feet tall and play against players who were much better than me. That teaches you a lot (if nothing else, it makes you pretty fearless, which is valuable.)
Now, there are a lot of AAU coaches who aren’t worth very much. But the same can be said for high school coaches as well. I had a good AAU coach, and a good high school varsity coach, but our JV coach (where you are supposed to learn many of the fundamentals) didn’t know very much about basketball.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Really good stuff as usual Jeff
One thing, at the bottom when you are talking about the handoff for an open three, you say JCB took the handoff instead of Hamilton. Hamilton took the handoff from Hill while JCB was preparing to set a screen for him.
Love these write-ups and it’s great to have the frame by frame breakdown of what’s going on at a nearly incomprehensible rate when it’s live. Also like when you talk about the choices the players have to make in such small time frames.
Thanks as usual!
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
Nov 11, 2011. UT vs: Boston University and the longhorns can officially quit caring about the football season.
Public Service Announcement: 11/01/11, 7:00 p.m., Kansas Jayhawks vs: Pittsburg St. Gorillas. . . Something to take their mind off of 10/15/11, 8:15 p.m.
In the dark ages
the geniuses at the UIL forbid any high school kid from attending any organized summer camps because they felt that it gave kids whose parents could afford the camps an unfair advantage over those kids who couldn’t afford them.
The irony is that you could go to Fonde and learn more in an hour than you could learn at any camp in a week.

by 









































