Longhorn Offense Still Seeking Big Plays
If the core of Bryan Harsin's offensive philosophy is his commitment to the power running game, the corollary and resulting commitment to throwing play-action passes to hit defenses sending an eighth man into the box is just as important to the overall success of his offense.
In fact, as the Longhorns seek big plays to bolster offensive production in the season's second half, the play-action passing game needs to play a major role as Harsin seeks to develop a vertical passing game that has struggled to produce big plays all season, but especially in the last two games.
The numbers for Texas are distressing offensively. With the inexperience at quarterback, it isn't surprising to see the underwhelming numbers the passing game is putting up, especially in comparison to other conference foes with high-powered aerial attacks like Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Baylor, and Texas Tech. Throw Texas A&M in there as well.
The Longhorns are clearly lagging behind the curve in the pass-happy league, ranking eighth in completion percentage, ninth in total passing yards, eighth in yards per attempt, eighth in quarterback rating, and have thrown the second-fewest touchdown passes. On and on. What's hidden in those numbers is an intense difficulty creating big plays through the vertical passing game. Actually in producing big plays at all.
The Longhorns are eighth in the Big 12 and 75th in the country with only 85 plays of 10 or more yards. Certainly a disappointing stat, but looking past those plays that have gone for between 10 and 20 yards, Harsin's offense is currently producing even fewer of the long-yardage plays that instantly flip field position or result in touchdowns -- the only two plays of more than 50 yards came against Rice in the first game with Garrett Gilbert at quarterback.
Since then, David Ash and Case McCoy have combined for five pass plays longer than 40 yards -- three by McCoy and two by Ash, a stat that runs somewhat contrary to the general perception that McCoy isn't as effective in the downfield passing game. Of course, that general perception exists for a reason, as Ash does have a stronger arm and should also prove to be more accurate on long passes as a result.
Take out McCoy's post to Mike Davis against UCLA that should have been intercepted and the numbers are even. But then the McCoy supporters can surely take out Ash's trick play completion to Jaxon Shipley against Iowa State on the reverse pass if the cherry picking of stats is going to happen.
The overall point remains that the Longhorns are struggling to complete passes over the top of the defense, especially in the last two games against Oklahoma and Oklahoma State, when the longest pass plays by either quarterback were a 23-yard pass from McCoy against OU, a 22-yarder from Ash against OU, and a 20-yard completion for Ash against OSU.
While Oklahoma opted to pressure the Longhorns by bringing a variety of blitzes to overwhelm the offensive line and the young quarterbacks standing behind it, Oklahoma State adopted a different tactic of limiting big plays by keeping two safeties deep and then not worrying about everything going on in front of them in an effort to make Texas move slowly down the field.
In those situations, the Longhorns are struggling to make big plays after the catch. In fact, of all those big plays in the passing game, only DJ Grant's touchdown against UCLA included significant yardage after the catch and that necessitated only a stroll into the end zone. It seems safe to say at this point that Texas simply doesn't have a receiver with the capability of making big yardage post catch. Perhaps Marquise Goodwin on the tunnel screens both Harsin and Greg Davis liked to run for him, but all of that yardage is after the catch and he's never managed to take one of those plays to paydirt.
As defenses use bracket coverage on Jaxon Shipley and refuse to commit a safety to the running game and take away the post routes even if Texas is gaining yards on the ground, producing those big plays remains difficult. It's the classic story of constraint plays and the ability to stretch the resources of a defense, something that Oklahoma and Oklahoma State are doing at an elite level.
Another factor is that two of the other six passes of 30 or more yards since the Garrett Gilbert era ended came as a result of trick plays -- passes from Ash and John Harris to Shipley, who threw another touchdown pass of his own from 23 yards out. Throw in the Statue of Liberty play and the Longhorns have scored four touchdowns on trick plays. Those four touchdowns represent almost 20% of the total touchdowns scored by the offense this season, with another handful coming from Fozzy Whittaker out of the Wildcat. Add it all up and it becomes even more clear that the base offense is struggling mightily to produce scores.
Since Harsin executes those trick plays so well and since there is so much room for progress with the offense as a whole, where the touchdowns come from right now isn't as important as whether or not they happen at all. What is a problem is having to rely too heavily on those plays against teams that can take away the reverse passes by having the scheme and player awareness to play contain and turn those potentially game-changing big plays into potentially game-changing negative plays, as Oklahoma did in the Cotton Bowl. Of course, the prevalence of negative plays is a story for another day.
Can Harsin get back to producing big passing plays with the type of trick plays that were working earlier in the season? Doing so could once again take pressure off of the base offense, a pressure release that's certainly needed at the moment.
The need to manufacture big plays in the running game as well casts further light on the once-again underutilized DJ Monroe. Sure, it's nice that he's more often in the game working as a decoy to open things up for Texas other places -- and it's scary to think about what the offense would look like were he not used in that capacity.
Let's just look at the raw numbers with Monroe. He's averaging 7.9 yards per rushing attempt with a median of six yards per carry and 12.8 yards per catch, amounting to 8.6 yards every time he touches the ball. Moreover, despite the fact that defenses have to key on Monroe, his median carry nets six yards and his median touch eight -- so those gaudy per-touch numbers are backed up by consistent success, not just a few long runs or catches.
If Texas has to move the ball slowly down the field, the biggest chunks in the running game are available through Monroe, with the least chance of a negative play or a play that puts the offense behind the chains. Even against Oklahoma and Oklahoma State, Monroe had only one negative play (his only negative play of the season) and two plays of less than six yards -- a five-yard catch against Oklahoma State and a two-yard run against Oklahoma that counts as a successful play because it picked up the first down. On the season, there's basically a one in five chance that a play to Monroe isn't successful and a one in 26 chance that it loses yardage.
To top it off, Monroe has seven explosive plays -- roughly one in every four touches -- and has another five carries (32%) that have gone for eight or nine yards. Basically, 50% of his plays are explosive or extremely close to it. And this guy can't get the ball 7-10 times per game? Really? Don't go Greg Davis on me here, Harsin.
The rest of the running game isn't quite as easy to track with the higher volume of carries for both Malcolm Brown and Fozzy Whittaker, but simply looking at their longest runs provides a similarly distressing story as the passing game. Upon his entrance into school at Texas, the major concern about Malcolm Brown was his ability to break off long runs i college and the answer to that is that he's struggled, with his longest run being 27 yards and his second-longest the Statue of Liberty play last weekend.
Perhaps it's heartening that both of those runs came against Oklahoma State, a possible sign of improvement for both Brown and the offensive line as it seeks to eliminate the individual errors that can negate the strong efforts of five or six other blockers, but until Brown can crack off a run of 40 or 50 yards, the skepticism about his ability to do so will remain as Texas fans wait with bated breath for Johnathan Gray to arrive next season as a running back who mostly certainly projects to turn in those type of efforts even in the college game.
As for Fozzy Whittaker, as impressive as he's been through the season's first half, his longest run is for 36 yards -- a Wildcat play against woeful UCLA and he hasn't had a run over 18 yards since, though it looked like a one of his runs against Oklahoma State may have gone for a touchdown had Cody Johnson peeled off his first block faster and gotten to the third level of the defense to block the final defender who had a shot at slowing Whittaker. With the surprisingly productive senior back working mostly of the Willdcat formation, it's understandable in some ways that he hasn't broken more long runs since defenses are clearly keyed to stop the run in those looks.
In the end, it's impossible to separate the various issues that are also currently plaguing the team like poor pass protection at times, poor pre-snap reads by the quarterbacks who didn't get Texas out of bad plays against the Sooners and Pokes, missed blocking assignments in the run game. Poor evaluation and development for years. Two quarterbacks with one pass attempt before 2011 vying for time several quarters into the season in a new system. On and on. So it goes.
Basically, the underlying issue is that the offense is still such a work in progress that stretching a defense thin enough with a variety of threats just isn't possible at this time. Until then, no matter how many individual plays are capable of creating major gains, executing those plays against defenses schemed to take them away is difficult at the least and impossible without players and coaches stepping up against opponents capable of gaining significant advantages in a specific area to start forcing opposing defenses to overcommit resources that start opening up other parts of the field.
Harsin and the offense are facing some serious challenges that involve a ton of moving parts. If the Texas offense is going to succeed moving forward, it will have to produce more big plays. And Harsin will have to earn every penny of that paycheck he's receiving from Texas.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I WANT MY RB SCREENS DAMNIT!!!!
That has been a big part of the big play package for Boise in the past.. The last 2 featured backs for BSU average over 10 yards a pass reception and around 3 receptions a game. I still don’t think we are not yet seeing the full arsenal yet…
We had a decent discussion n Twitter over this, but what does everyone else think is the reasoning for the lack of a RB screen game so far?
JD’s like, "you want some f*ing pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, b*#&hes!"- RCCook
LSB: "Oh s#*t, JD. You crazy!"
forgiving the lack of coherence in your 3rd sentence,
I got the gist of it.
I would suspect a few things to be the culprit:
-injuries to our receivers that can actually block
-the I formation isn’t exactly ideal for running the screen game (it can work well if done correctly with experienced players).
-We have clearly stated we want to be a power running team. RB screens don’t fit that description imho.
-For the most part, the running game HAS been working. Sputtery, but it nets us yards.
But far and away the most important reason (I believe) is:
-An unwillingness to remind anyone of GDGD. Think about it. You take the job of someone who was just fired. You know the tendencies that got him fired. Why would you remind anyone of those tendencies? Especially, when you are known as the guy who makes his own tendencies. He has run a few. Perhaps he could run a few more…later in the season. Any GDGD comparison would go out the window if the screen actually works, and doesn’t net us -2 yards. No one hated GD (or at least couldn’t fault him) when we were competing for championships.
It will come. I think a Fozzy inside screen from the I would work very well if our line stops resembling jello (probably late in the season). Replace Fozzy with DJ and you would have an incredibly hard to catch (he’s tiny…you can’t even see him when he’s surrounded by lineman and LB’s) potential gamebreaker if he could shake (or truck, I guess…he’s done it once or twice. Just seems silly to say. Sillier to watch. ) a guy or two.
My very low regarded 2c.
Boise St. not only runs RB screens
they run dual RB screens (left and right) as well, with the QB picking which one isn’t covered. Very sophisticated plays.
These are not like GD’s wide receiver screens, though. And they take precise execution, which is one of the key problems the Horns are trying to solve at this time.
We ran one at OSU...I thought.
The one we threw to DJ had Malcolm on the other side I believe.
Don't remember that but we may well have done so.
Cool plays to bedevil a defense…in the future they will be great fun.
it is amazing
Texas enjoys a nice advantage in recruiting, but in 1.5 yrs I have not seen 1 individual athletic play on offense. Harsin has schemed some very nice plays, but until someone shows the ability to take a run or a 5 yard pass 50 yds it will be tough sledding. The explosiveness of the offense is distressing. It was essentially the difference in OSU game
by codaxx on Oct 21, 2011 12:51 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
not since one Jordan Shipley graced us with his presence...
…I read this site constantly and damn near every single shortcoming we are experiencing is directly related to lack of experience in players and coordinators. I am not worried. I am excited. Every game I watch has so much to new stuff to learn as a fan. Surely there is frustration at times but I like the way things are progressing and I have legitimate hope for a 8 or 9 win season with a trip to some random bowl (which will provide our team with more practice time). This team is trending up, we as fans just need to be patient and enjoy the ride.
Because being a Texas fan means never having to say you're sorry.
by dukeoforange on Oct 21, 2011 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions
where o where has my dj gone
one of the downfalls of greg davis was his inability to get dj monroe the ball.harsin seems to be bitten by the same bug.dj needs 10-12 touches a game.malcolm brown needs 25 carries,fozzy needs 8-10.the qb need to average 20-25 passes but only if the o-line is willing to block.one problem i see is how many plays we have multiple te`s in the game.instead put fozzy,malcolm,dj,jaxon,and mike davis as the skill players and force teams to cover our skill.the defense does not respect our te`s which leaves more defenders to stop our offense.HOOK`EM
I disagree with the Fozzy MB split.
So far….who has our most explosive HB been running (excluding the tiny DJ)? So…the logic would point to…that’s right. Run the shit out of Fozzy.
MB has years. This is Fozzy’s last year.
Fozzy has MAN strength. He has far better shake and wiggle to him. This was evident when MB tried to run outside in almost the same play-call as Fozzy had earlier and completely got shut-down, because he couldn’t shake the outside lb….the commentators even noticed and played Fozzy’s play after, saying, “That right there is the difference between freshman and senior”, or something to that extent. Basically, he is a 4-star recruit who has been hurt for 3 years (and used the time wisely). He has had no one but a pass-block heavy line and a weak-ass S&C program to help him in the past, and is flourishing in our new system. Why would you want to limit that? Or the number of explosive plays?
MB is good. He is especially good at trucking and wiggling in tight quarters. But as far as the rest of the offense, Fozzy should take the remainder of the snaps. He simply has far more potential right now. Furthermore, the last thing we need is to is hurt a proven staple as a Freshman to the extent that he won’t get spring training in at best, or at worst leads to a string of surgeries and plagues his career (ahem Fozzy, Irby), in a year that most fans think “doesn’t count” I think it should be 8-10 DJ, 20-25 Fozzy, 10-15 MB, 2-5 CJ (he is still a FAST FB/H-Back/whatever and could surprise the defense if MB/Ash carried a fake out well. An absolute load to take down…when he’s rolling).
I thought MB ran much better against OSU...more drive, more quickness in the hole
and a better sense of getting down field.
I think Fozzy should be in the 10 or so carry category…we’ve found a great niche for him and we can give him more carries anytime we need it.
Agree with that CJ and Bergeron should get some carries in non-third-and-short situations.
Fozzy is heathy
Fozzy is healthy for the first time in forever, he is a game breaker and has speed and power. i wonder if the coaches are limiting his reps to keep his wind for the kickoff returns? He may bring another one back next week, that would be unheard of.
Fozzy is great but...
He is not great up the middle…good around the corners and great for that short pass across the middle (would actually be perfect for the screen being discussed. But he does not have the same cut back power that MB demonstrates as he pulls through the middle. MB is very young…but he gets better everytime he touches the ball…this year is about next year…give MB the ball!
Just run the damn ball and move the chains, as boring as it will be, until the D loads the box and guess what ?
The passing game just might open up. We seem to do pretty well with DJ,Foz and Brown….why would we not just keep bangin away with these 3?
Seems to be that we would want to keep the decision making and turnover issues in the running game rather than pressuring our “1 start in his career” freshman.
BTW, everything is going to be wonderful when we play Kansas, but will change dramatically against K state and the aggroids.
Run the ball !
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Oct 21, 2011 1:08 PM CDT reply actions
Problem
Texas offense is the prototype Diaz offense. Diaz believes that there are very few teams capable of driving 8-12 plays and scoring in CFB. He believes a negative play or turnover is likely to stall a high play drive. He is dead right. Most CFB offenses cant do it. Yes, there are 5-10 that can and most are in the Big 12. If Texas cant get 1-2 big scoring plays a game it will be a struggle. We have run well, but lets not let one game delude us into thinking this is a dominant rushing team like Nebraska of the 90s.
We'll need quite few.....as an aside
did you see what Arizona did to UCLA last night?
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
we should recruit that streaker
he looked like he had some big play potential as it took them awhile to catch him.
Because being a Texas fan means never having to say you're sorry.
by dukeoforange on Oct 21, 2011 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Honestly I think all of this comes back to blocking
I’ve been watching LonghornScott’s breakdowns over at BC, and it’s amazing to see the number of plays he pulls up with one flaw: “If this blocker gets his head up field, Player X here might break this for a TD.”
I think scheme-wise these guys have big play opportunities all the time. The problem is that our blockers rarely get up to the second level and when they do they don’t always block the right man. That’s if the lead or pulling blockers hit the right hole to begin with.
This is just going to get solved by reps, reps, and more reps. We’ll have to separate those who get the scheme from those who don’t.
A big goat in the OU game was the TE’s. They had a bad day blocking and couldn’t win blocks on DE’s. We may need to recruit some big TE blockers.
Some O-Line reps and a couple large OT and TE recruits and we may see this offense’s production turn around in a hurry.
Whaley is not a walk on...he's a major recruiting mistake by everybody who didn't offer him a schollie,including OU
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Oct 21, 2011 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions
not sure about that
the only play he had worth a damn in the Texas game he was not touched, he was shut completely down anytime he hit traffic.
He is currently the # 2 Rusher in the conference with 627 yds
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Oct 21, 2011 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions
what does that mean?
Wouldn’t see the field at TAMU. I doubt he starts at Texas. Great story, in a great offense, but this is the second coming of apete
by codaxx on Oct 21, 2011 10:36 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Exactly
If you put Shipley/Fozzy/Brown/Monroe/Goodwin or even Ash behind some solid blocking at the line and downfield, you’re going to start seeing 10+ or 20+ yard plays game in and game out.
Right now those guys have to make 1 or 2 defenders miss to make it to 4 yards, when what we really want is those guys in 1 on 1’s with safeties.
Downfield blocking is weak
Long runs are all about either a gambling defense (see UT vs OSU) or great downfield blocking. We know Foz runs great in the open field because he is awesome on kickoff returns. DJ Monroe is also great because he is so fast. Our best hope is to continue to improve our running game and lure a safety into the box and then throw over the top. May be tough since most coaches don’t want to give up the big play so they keep their safeties back.
Don’t know about the other downfield blockers but our WRs that play most of the time are young and physically weak and not great blockers. Cody is still trying to get the hang of blocking. With all the H backs, fullbacks, and TEs we are playing, you would think we would have some awesome down field blocking. It is probably going to take a while to get this sorted out. Hope harsin stays for awhile. y guess is that he is gone in a couple of years. The good, they get promoted young.
Biggest reason for few big plays: rookie QBs who have a lot to learn. Most victories are going to be like pulling teeth.
I’d like to see more wild Foz and more Foz and DJ Monroe slightly split out to get short passes in the flat and run with it. Maybe Foz needs to do less TB just to limit his total carries (between TB, wild Foz, returning kicks, and catching passes as a slot guy) to less than 20 and to reduce the intensity of the hits to him. Definitely don’t decrease his kickoff returns or wild Foz.
I think we missed a golden opportunity
the last couple of weeks by not taking what both OU and OSU defenses were giving us. OU blitzed the hell out of us and Harsin did not adjust with hurry up offense, check downs to the flat, quick drops to underneath routes, etc. OSU hung back and dared us to beat them on penny, nickel, dime short yardage. We almost did that. But like you say, getting our speed in space could have forced the Cowboy defense to draw up tighter.
As I mentioned in my review earlier this week, Harsin has a way to go yet in dialing in the right formula to beat the top conference teams.
Burnt Orange Nation
Follow Along on Twitter @TXStampede


































