Texas Dominates Kansas 43-0, Continues To Improve
There wasn't much doubt that Texas would beat the Jayhawks on Saturday, but fans were eager to see if the Longhorns could assert themselves and control the game for four quarters against an inferior opponent. They most certainly did, obliterating Kansas 43-0, outgaining the Jayhawks 590 to 46 in total yardage. No, that's not a typo.
With the win Texas moves to 5-2 on the season, 2-2 in the Big 12, rebounding from back-to-back losses against the Oklahomas in impressive fashion, on a weekend when we were reminded that anything can happen in perhaps the deepest year in Big 12 history. Oklahoma rebounded from their home loss to Tech to crush previously undefeated Kansas State with 38 unanswered points, while Tech got blown out at home by Iowa State(!), and Texas A&M blew yet another second half lead in an overtime home loss to Missouri. The only thing that could make the A&M GTFO Tour better at this point would be for this young Texas team to pull off a win in College Station.
Even this Kansas team had managed to remain competitive going into halftime of three of their four conference games this year, so while there seemed to be little chance that Kansas would come in to Austin and challenge UT for an upset, it was hardly a given that the Longhorns would dominate the Jayhawks as completely as they did. Consider some of these numbers (after the jump):
* Texas picked up 35 first downs, while allowing Kansas just 3.
* Texas rushed the ball for 441 yards on 72 carries, the most since Vince Young, Cedric Benson, and Selvin Young teamed up for 513 on the ground versus North Texas in the 2004 season opener.
* On the other side of the ball, Texas held Kansas to -2 yards rushing on 20 carries.
* Overall, the Longhorns defense held Kansas to 46 total yards of offense, and before anyone qualifies that with, "Yeah, but Kansas sucks," consider the following: (1) You have to go back to 1944 to find a better defensive performance by the Longhorns defense (37 yards allowed against Southwestern - who?), and (2) the 46 yards allowed Saturday was 359 yards below the Jayhawks season average heading into the game.
* How completely did Texas control the game? They ran 93 plays and had the ball for 44:07, while Kansas managed just 36 plays across 15:53 of game time. The 36 total plays is the fewest allowed in the history of the Big 12 conference.
* All told, Texas outgained Kansas 590 to 46, just the third time in school history that Texas has recorded over 500 yards of total offense while holding the opponent to under 100 total yards. The other two instances came in 2001, when Texas crushed Kansas (606 yards gained versus 67 allowed), and 2009 when the Horns dominated UTEP (639 yards gained versus 53 allowed).
As thorough a whipping as it was, I could go on (and on and on), and if you enjoyed those numbers, go ahead and print out the box score -- it's ridiculous. And to think, this is still a green offense with a freshman quarterback who's learning his way.
So what's the big takeaway from this game? The truth of the matter is, Kansas was so outmatched physically that there's not too much we can say about what this means for the rest of the season, where the competition will be decidedly better, but it was nonetheless a very satisfying and encouraging win that confirmed a lot of the progress this team is making. Above all else, it was a tremendous performance by a very good and steadily improving defense, as well as another encouraging data point that our offense is improving in its blocking and overall execution, the importance of which I'll expound on at the end of this post.
Beating this Kansas team may not be much to brag about, but Texas fans have to like how this team continues to develop and improve. A few specific notes:
Run the damn ball! Those who wished Bryan Harsin would just RUN THE DAMN BALL had to be pleased with Saturday night's performance, as Texas pounded out 441 yards on the ground across 72 carries (6.1 per attempt), including 4 touchdowns from the tailbacks -- 2 each for both Malcolm Brown and Joe Bergeron. The two freshmen each finished with over 100 yards, as Brown methodically picked up 119 yards on 28 carries (4.2 ypc) while Bergeron had a breakout performance dominating the 4th quarter, finishing with 136 yards on 13 impressive carries (10.5), and Fozzy chipped in 68 more on just 9 carries (7.6).
More important than the gaudy stats is the ongoing development amongst the offensive linemen and tight ends. The true freshman Josh Cochran did a fantastic job anchoring the left side of the line, where the left tackle was extremely effective at the point of attack. Harsin also rolled out some new players at tight end, trotting out Luke Poehlmann as a blocking tight end, and giving Traylon Shead some looks at the position as well. An underrated component of Boise State's offense was/is their tight end play and Texas is aggressively trying to find its best options to assist its blossoming running game.
A nice balance. As much and as well as Texas ran the ball, I liked what Harsin did to try and continue to bring along David Ash. Though Texas assuredly could have won the game without attempting a single pass, Harsin wisely involved his freshman quarterback, and Ash did a solid job managing the game. Ash completed 14 of his 18 pass attempts for 145 yards, and made just two freshman mistakes -- taking a bad sack running backwards to try and make a play, and throwing a pick into double coverage on a terrible read. Texas also failed to execute a QB sneak on 4th and Goal from the 1, but the whole offensive unit looked discombobulated on the botched attempt.
Beyond those two mistakes, Ash turned in a steady performance, and scored his first career rushing touchdown on a nice scamper when he couldn't find a receiver in the end zone. All in all, it was a positive performance for the freshman to build on as the team gets ready for a challenging closing stretch to the season.
Dominant defense... Even early in the season when Texas jumped out to a 4-0 record we talked about waiting for four quarters of dominant play from this defense. We certainly saw that on Saturday night, and I liked that Manny Diaz reinserted his starters late in the fourth quarter to preserve the shut out. Kansas has bigger problems, and I thought it was a good way for our defense to finish the game. We may well find ourselves in a situation where we need a stop to preserve a win over one of the teams left on our schedule, and I like that Diaz brought back in our starters to try and preserve the shut out, our first since 2005 (62-0 over Baylor).
You don't want to get too carried away about wins over bad teams, but this was the second straight strong performance from this defense. Yes, we lost to Oklahoma State, but our defense provided the most resistance the Pokes have seen this season, and they followed it up by whipping the Jayhawks offense like no other defense had to date. Coming into the game KU's offense was averaging 5.5 yards per play on the season, and 5.2 per play in Big 12 play. They managed just 1.3 per play against Texas, failing to nudge their total yards gained (46) above total plays run (36) until their final drive of the game, all 28 yards of which was gained against our back ups, until Diaz reinserted his starters to finish off Kansas for good.
Dominance up front. The performance of Texas' defensive line this season has at times been underrated by fans, largely because of the stats it was (or wasn't, as the case may be) recording, but they finally 'got theirs' against Kansas, completely dominating the Jayhawks up front with a performance that didn't leave much else for the rest of the defense to do. Jackson Jeffcoat apparently got tired of hearing that he's struggling and led the way on the stat sheet with a team-high 7 tackles, including 3 for a loss (1 sack), 2 QB hurries, and a pass broken up. Kheeston Randall forced a fumble and had 3 tackles and 2 QB hurries, and both of Alex Okafor's tackles went for losses and he forced two fumbles of his own. Add in Chris Whaley's impressive sack and the Texas' DL combined for 6 tackles for loss, 3 sacks, 3 forced fumbles, and 4 QB hurries. And the Jayhawks only managed to run 36 plays, mind you.
Although this unit has at times struggled to get pressure on the quarterback, a big part of that has simply been a reflection of the choices made by opposing offenses, who have largely fired the ball rapidly. Overall, though, this group has been the primary reason why Texas has largely shut down opponents rushing games, and the three big busts that have gone for long touchdowns (Whaley's 64-yarder in the RRS, and Smith's 30- and 74-yard romps) were failures at the second level.
Manny Diaz's defensive scheme tends to funnel the tackling stats to the linebackers, so it was nice to see Saturday's box score reflect the quality play that this year's D-Line has mostly delivered. We'll certainly need them to play well against the remaining offenses on the schedule, all of which can light up the scoreboard like OU and Oklahoma State.
Other hat tips. Briefly, salutes as well to: Quandre Diggs, who's rebounded exceptionally well from his "Welcome to the big leagues" moment in Dallas, finishing with 5 tackles (2 for loss) and his second pick of the season, showcasing more of his playmaking skills as the game continues to slow down for him.... Chris Whaley, who's coming along nicely at DT, a la Henry Melton, and is starting to look like a likely starter next year.... and Kenny Vaccaro and Carrington Byndom, who are somewhat quietly anchoring what's quickly becoming a difficult secondary to pass on. We'll certainly find out a lot more against the remaining offenses on the schedule, but there's been a whole lot to like about the progress and development of this unit thus far. Hopefully they'll be peaking by Thanksgiving and give us a chance to send off A&M in style.
Final thoughts. The dominant theme of my discussions with fellow fans in the 24 hours since the game ended has been, "Just how terrible is Kansas?" Safe to say they're awful, and perhaps getting worse with every loss in this miserable season, but in any case it was great to see this Texas team clamp down and dominate the game for four full quarters. As fabulously as we ran the ball, given the season-long ineptitude of the KU defense and modestly competent performances by the offense, I think the bigger takeaway from the game was the obliterating performance of our defense.
On offense, more than the success itself -- seemingly a given for any offense facing KU this year -- I found myself focused on three important storylines. First, we saw Harsin stick with his commitment to David Ash, not only as QB1 but as a passer. After the loss to OSU, not only could the offensive coaches have re-introduced more of a time-share amongst the two quarterbacks, but they could have pounded out a 64-point shredding of Kansas without attempting a single pass. I was pleased with both decisions. Kansas provided a nice confidence builder for Ash, who still made freshman mistakes but was given the chance to throw nearly 20 passes and improve his ability to manage the offense. To the extent the coaches believe he's the long-term guy at QB -- as they clearly do -- this was great to see, and important for Ash's development.
Second, it was interesting to see Harsin's tweaks to our base running sets, where he experimented with new players at tight end -- one bigger and stronger (Poehlmann), one smaller and quicker (Shead). Whether or not those players last in their roles, it was perhaps a message to the incumbents (Grant, Irby, Jones, and Matthews), who have variously struggled to provide the blocking Harsin demands from the position, as well as a pretty strong indication of what this base offense is going to look like the rest of the year. I like it on both counts, and don't much care which personnel gets it done. With our true freshman QB under center, we're going to be an extreme power rushing team that mainly asks our quarterback to keep defenses honest by being an effective manager who can introduce some variety.
Third and most importantly, the very real, observable improvement we're seeing in this offensive unit in terms of blocking and execution is hugely encouraging. Although the offenses in the SEC the last decade have often been underwhelming -- in part because of mediocre quarterback play, and in part a reflection of the superior defenses they face -- the thing that's often overlooked (but is a huge reason why they've won five straight BCS titles) is how much the offenses of the top teams in the conference improve as the season goes on. They're rarely flashy, but year in and year out the offenses of the top teams in the SEC get stronger and steadier as the season goes on, a big reason why offenses with underwhelming quarterbacks have nonetheless been able to combine with elite defense to control title games.
Obviously we're not talking about a championship caliber Texas team this year, but to those of us who are (properly, in my opinion) evaluating this 2011 season not by wins and losses but by the developmental processes the staff employs, it's impossible to overstate how encouraging it is to see the in-season improvement that we are. I think you have to just throw out the OU game -- the first time our youngsters got popped in the mouth, and struggled to respond. What's mattered to me has been the ways we've continued to get demonstrably better in foundational ways. Looking at how strong a rushing team we've become with little passing game to help out, I see a lot of the same kind of development you see in those top SEC teams, and like those teams we won't need our quarterback to be a superhero to compete for championships if we're going to continue to field teams that steadily build and improve, both in-season and season-to-season. From what we're seeing this year, that's looking like what to expect. It's important, and exciting.
So yeah, it was a terrible Kansas team, and yeah, the rest of the season ahead could be pretty damn bumpy. But once again we saw the kinds of things that bode well for our long-term trajectory. Whether we win out or lose each of our next five, that's the standard that really matters.
Hook 'em
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks To The LHN
I didn’t get to see the game.So I had to depend on Craig Way to tell me what was going on.
The thing that impressed was Texas’ ball control ability letting the D stay fresh all game.
I really couldn’t tell if Ash had improved that much but it sure seemed that our D did.
I think KU was getting about 400 yds. on offenses a game and to hold them to 3 first downs was amazing.
by TCB Orange Dino on Oct 31, 2011 2:56 AM CDT reply actions
Not impressed in beating KU
But impressed in HOW we beat them. Don’t care what people say, it’s damn near impossible to get a shut out against anybody, including bad teams. KU’s offense is decent (avg 30 pts/game) so our defensive performance was simply amazing.
Great confidence booster heading against tech.
by jtdoes on Oct 31, 2011 3:54 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Without Question
Joe Bergeron auditioned for and convincingly won the RB closer role!
Don't talk too much...Under promise, over deliver!
--Mike Tomlin, Pittsburgh Steelers Head Coach
"evaluating this 2011 season not by wins and losses but by the developmental processes"
I understand where you’re coming from but as the great orator and statesman Kanye West once rapped “Moral victories is for minor league coaches” (whatever the hell that means). But seriously, I subscribe the Vince Lombardy School of Philosophy: If it doesn’t matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score? But I do have to say I am encouraged by what I’m seeing, to the point where I think we might actually beat a certain nut-squeezing military wannabe school this year, which would erase all the setbacks up to that point for me. Excellent post-mortem on Texas-Kansas Peter.
Hook Em Horns!
Solid win, somewhat concerned about vertical passing game
No question about it….in a season where Tech can beat a Top ranked OU squad on the road and then lose to an ISU team that had been blown out several times at home, you don’t take any win for granted. (BTW, what is it with ISU playing the spoiler-spoiler…did the same thing to UT last season after big NU win.)
My only knock on Saturday night’s win over KU is what seemed like an inability to get vertical in the passing game. Same thing against OSU. It needs a lot of work and we failed to get any more comfortable with it against KU.
When a team can’t get vertical, it’s usually because the O-Line can’t protect long enough or the receivers can’t get separation. From my vantage point, I thought our line protected great and the receivers were fine…plus, with us pounding the run, the play action should have been there all night.
The one time I did see Ash complete a ball downfield, he had to scramble for an hour first and then lofted up a pass that the receiver could have fair caught like a punt.
I’m sure Ash is tentative after the picks he threw against OU, but he’s going to have to get comfortable fast because I don’t think we can win the last five games without a vertical passing game. If the other teams don’t respect the deep or intermediate routes, they’re going to put 9 in the box and Malcolm’s going to be running into a brick wall the whole time.
@longhorn54b
One step at a time
Eventually, Ash will be going deep after PA. For now, Harsin is limiting Ash to screen and draws when the defense loads up to stop the run.
Remember, Ash is only a true freshman. I know we all want him to be a senior right now, but we have to give him time. That’s what Harsin is doing.
Agreed
But I think 54b’s point is that the result of “giving him time” is going to be a loaded line of scrimmage, against which running will be difficult.
He doesn’t need to throw a lot. But he has to throw off PA occasionally to keep the secondary honest.
"A lot of people look for the easy way to do anything, in swimming there is no easy way." - Eddie Reese
i only remember 1 deep ball
That was Davis and he got his feet tangled up with cb on play so hard to tell if pass was soilid.
by codaxx on Oct 31, 2011 1:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Other Freshman can throw the long ball
Just because they want him to get comfortable doesn’t mean you can’t use it or expect it. Ash surely threw a few bombs in high school, it’s not unreasonable to expect a D1 qb at Texas to throw a ball accurately over 30 yards
i was at the game
I am wondering how many inaccurate deep balls he threw. I only remember one real long ball being thrown and Davis stumbled after getting feet tied up. He was 14-18. Were they any other?
I travelled to the game for two reasons:
1) LHN
2) I wanted to see an ass kicking
I was duly satisfied. As the band was marching out, I told Padre that we got what we paid for: a seal-clubbing that would’ve done Nick Saban proud.
Harsinwhite likely realized that they got too fancy too soon. So after two weeks of getting knocked back by quality defenses, they went all “Mr. T” in a dark, angry gym for two weeks, instilling the kind of dead-eyed focus that leads to a result like we saw.
True Freshman QB...
Two true freshman RBs with most of the carries
True FR LT
RS FR Cetner
True FR leading receiver
Only three upperclassman on the starting offense at all (unless you count FB, H back and TE at the same time and then it’s 4).
About half of the defensive starters + regulars are underclassmen, and some of the seniors who start are unquestionably among the lower performers (Robinson, Gideon/Scott).
Next year our defense has the opportunity to be one of the GOATs if a couple of guys develop. Secondary will be ridiculous if Vacarro sticks around.
by Erasmus Funderburke on Oct 31, 2011 10:14 AM CDT reply actions
Worth noting
Manny Diaz didn’t bring the starters back in after KU crossed the 50. It was Keenan Robinson. He got Acho and some secondary guys and the D-line followed to go out and protect the shutout. Finally, tangible evidence of your captain and MLB wanting to rip out an opponent’s still beating heart. Hopefully this is Robinson’s turning point. Senior has had an unspectacular year.
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Oct 31, 2011 10:24 AM CDT via iPhone app reply actions
Question for the crowd
Who do you think is the Longhorns MVP to this point in the season?
My vote is Malcolm Brown.
Simplicity is always the secret, to a profound truth, to doing things, to writing, to painting. Life is profound in its simplicity. - Charles Bukowski
I'd have to agree
Malcolm has been the most consistent offensive player and has stabilized this offense.
The defense is tough. Byndom got the accolades coming out of OSU, but I’d give it to Vaccaro. Love what he does for this offense.
Special teams? Fozzy, hands down.
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Oct 31, 2011 11:19 AM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Seriously, I'd go with Malcolm Brown too
Easily the most consistent contributor on offense and the threat of a decent running attack has undoubtedly helped allow our offense more options.
@longhorn54b
of course
See ya later, alligator and sheep-mater.
by Paleface Horn on Oct 31, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions
not
See ya later, alligator and sheep-mater.
by Paleface Horn on Oct 31, 2011 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions
I thought this was a real interesting wrinkle
Harsin also rolled out some new players at tight end, trotting out Luke Poehlmann as a blocking tight end, and giving Traylon Shead some looks at the position as well
Our TE’s haven’t been impressive in blocking, and we need a solution there really fast if we want to grow around our power running.
Been wanting to see both moves
The blocking of the TEs has been inadequate so I suggested in a comment a couple of weeks back that Harsin try out an underutilized (relatively) small OL guy with good hands as a TE. Luke is actually bigger (295 pounds now) and plays more than what I suggested but the main idea is the same. The KU coach said after the game that Luke was very effective as a blocker and that KU simply could not stop the play once Luke came in and blocked for the run game.
It is very unusual for a TE to be a lot bigger than the DE is blocking. A 295 pound TE can run block a DE all by himself, leaving the runside OT free to wreak havoc elsewhere. Since a TE blocks nearly every down but catches only a few passes/game, this trade up to a much bigger TE really made/makes sense to me. The big TE can still catch a short pass to move the chain (heaven help the safety or LB who has to tackle this man mountain).
Yeah, I'm interested to see how this move pans out.
If we’re running the ball 70 times a game, why not put an OT in at TE?
I'll take the win, but...
I’m still not convinced that David Ash is the future. Remember, Garrett Gilbert had some high scoring victories last year. Who are we fooling, it was the running game that won this game on the offense. That’s fine and all if you want to beat Kansas, but we have a long ways to go to beat the likes of OU or OSU. At this point, David Ash looks to me like a more athletic Garrett Gilbert. Far too much is put on physical attributes, but QBs like Aaron Rodgers, Joe Montana…even Major Applewhite have shown that it takes much more than just being a physical specimen. I was highly doubtful of Case McCoy’s abilities in spring practice, but the connection he had with Jaxon Shipley and his game management skills in real game situations showed far more upside than David Ash…despite his physical shortcomings. Only time will tell… Hookem!
I thought David Ash actually played pretty well.
For me, I can actually see the progression in his abilities. He made some nice throws into coverage, then one extremely bad one. I think it’s youth that plagues him at this point.
I’m optimistically cautious. I have faith that Harsin will bring him a long correctly.
Me: "Hunny, how much is our Wedding budget?"
Fiance`"No, You can't have Craig Way call our wedding.."
Me: "Damnit.."
Rodgers 225 is his NFL weight
He was 6’2" and under 200 pounds. He overlooked by all major BCS colleges because of size. Cal took him as a JuCo transfer.
225 is his NFL weight
He was 6’2" and under 200 pounds when he was a senior in high school. He was overlooked by all major BCS colleges because of size. Cal took him as a JuCo transfer.
Does anyone know
when was the last time we had two 100 yard rushers in the same game? I know they are emphasizing that it was the first time ever for 2 Texas freshmen to do that in a game, but I can’t remember the last time ANY 2 players did that for Texas.
Don't know,
but I bet if someone looks it up, one of their initials will be VY.
Also I bet it happened a few times with Ricky Williams as Shon Mitchell was a pretty good RB in his own right at the time.
2004
I know Ced and VY did it a number of times in 2004.
Maybe Colt and Jamal Charles might have done it too in 2007…but if you’re going on net yards, sacks count against rush totals. So maybe not.
I think the last time two running backs did it was also 2004…..Selvin Young and Ced Benson.
@longhorn54b
I think we had three in one game back when the wishbone was in
I think Koy,Woster and Burleson(sp) all had over 100 in one game.
How many plays did Shead get and how did he look?
by TCB Orange Dino on Oct 31, 2011 12:30 PM CDT reply actions
Improvement is the name of the game here
A good bowl game and a stronger 2012 campaign.
Because we're Texas and we're evil. DUH.
Interesting note on the starters returning for the defense
It was actually a decision that Keenan Robinson and Emmanuel Acho decided to make. Mack Brown said after the game that there would have been some issues, but he was happy that they had enough pride to want to preserve the shutout.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Oct 31, 2011 1:45 PM CDT reply actions
*That there would have been some issues if they got hurt...
Burnt Orange Nation
Follow Along on Twitter @TXStampede

by 






























