Understanding Rick Barnes' Texas Basketball Offense: The Flex
A little bit more than a year ago, Rick Barnes worked with Jerry Sloan to revamp his offense. I have now spent some time studying the Texas offense from last season, and will spend several posts attempting to describe it in detail. Jerry Sloan's offenses with the Utah Jazz were popularly associated with the pick and roll, but there was a lot more to his offense than ball screens. Sloan also made heavy use of staggered screens of the sort that I have previously described, as well as an offense known in basketball circles as the Flex.
The Flex has been around for a long time. It is one of the great offenses of basketball. It is simple enough to teach to middle school kids. It also threatens the defense in ways serious enough that it is used throughout high school basketball, college basketball, and the NBA. There are some nice descriptions of how the Flex works on the Internet, but in studying game footage from the 2010-2011 Texas Longhorns season, I noticed that Barnes runs things a bit differently from the "standard" approach to the flex. The Flex forms the basis for most of what Texas ran on offense last year. After the jump, I will dive into explaining the Flex as it has been implemented by Rick Barnes. In a future posts, I will look at other aspects of the Texas offense.
The "standard" approach to the Flex
Before I describe the version of the Flex that Rick Barnes cooked up with Jerry Sloan, I think it is worth taking a bit of time and describing the way that the Flex is typically run. If you are interested in the details of what I am calling the standard Flex, then I highly recommend this post by Sebastian Pruiti of NBA Playbook.com. I won't go into nearly as much depth, and will just cover the single most basic element of this offense.
The standard approach to the Flex creates two really effective threats. The first is termed the "Flex cut." To understand this cut, we start with the diagram below. This diagram shows the position of the five offensive players. The player with the ball is on the right side of the court, off of center and near the three point line. One wing stands near the corner on the ball side. There is another player standing in a position that more or less mirrors the position of the player with the ball. One player stands at the low block, on the off-ball side, and one player stands in the corner on the off-ball side. The player who stands in the corner on the side away from the ball cuts across the lane, using the screen set by the player in the low post. This maneuver is called the "Flex cut."
The Flex cut presents a serous challenge to the defense. While in the diagram above I show the cutter running under the screen, the cutter can actually also go over top of the screen as well. In addition, as described by Pruiti and as I will show below, the cutter also has a third option -- the curl. So with all of these options, the defender has a lot on his plate. He is typically going to need some help from the player defending the person setting the screen.
Flex enthusiasts take advantage of this helping defender by using a tactic known as "picking for the picker." If we were to study basketball plays, including quick hitting set plays and in-bounds plays, and distill them down to basic motifs that work, I suspect that picking for the picker would come up often. In the Flex, the pick for the picker comes from the third player on the weak side of the play. This is shown in the diagram above, as well as the diagram below. This screen is hard to fight through, particularly after the ball has been rotated back and forth several times. The standard Flex is a "continuity" offense, meaning that this basic pattern is repeated over and over until the defense breaks down. After setting the down screen, the screener pops out to the corner, and the whole offense repeats on the opposite side of the court.
There is more to the Flex than what I have described. The ball can also go to the man in the corner, or the man in the corner can come to the wing to catch the ball (which is how Texas runs it most often). But for all intents and purposes, this is the basic pattern.
Understanding the Texas Flex
The approach that Barnes takes with the Flex (likely on the advice of Jerry Sloan), is different from the standard approach in several ways. First, Texas does not use the pick for the picker element that I described above. Additionally, the Texas approach does not follow a simple continuity pattern used by the standard Flex, it is a little bit more complicated. Rather than simply describing it, let's take a look at it, using snapshots taken from last season's home game against Texas Tech, played on February 5, 2011.
Let's set things up with the first shot, shown below. On offense, Texas comes down in transition and looks to post up Gary Johnson. It isn't there, so Texas flows directly into their offense. Balbay (labeled with the yellow arrow) has the ball. He is preparing to reverse the ball to the man at the top, while the man on the opposite side is preparing to cut to the wing. Ultimately, this opposite wing is where the ball is going.
In the next photo, we see what happens when the ball is passed to the top. I have used yellow lines to indicate where everyone is moving. Jordan Hamilton is making the Flex cut, with Gary Johnson setting the screen. Joseph is popping out to catch the pass at the wing, while Balbay is preparing to relocate to a spot near Gary Johnson. I want to draw your attention to the first big difference between the way Texas runs the Flex, and the standard Flex that I described above. The spacing is different. There is no one standing in the corner on the ball side, barely threatening the defense. Instead, this man is flashing to the wing, preparing to receive a pass. The ball is also centered in the middle of the court, which doesn't really ever happen with the spacing of the standard Flex. To be honest, while I grew up with the standard approach, I like the way that Barnes has things spaced here. What often happens is that the man standing in the corner on offense in the standard Flex doesn't do very much, and his defender can sag off a bit and clog up things for the Flex cut, knowing that he is near enough to close out if the pass goes to the man in the corner.
Now we can jump to the next photo. Let's take a look at what has happened. The ball was passed to the wing. Hamilton ran under the screen, and is coming open on the low post. When I previously wrote about staggered screens, I spent some time describing how the offensive player should read the screen on that play. With the Flex cut, it is also necessary to read the screen. In this case, Hamilton's defender followed him under the screen, so Hamilton made the correct read. Later in this post, I will show how the man making the Flex cut reacts if the defender attempts to beat him through the screen. (Pruiti's article also deals with this.)
So far, aside from the spacing, things are looking more or less like the standard Flex. But here is where things get a significantly different. If we were in the standard Flex, Balbay would be setting a screen for Johnson in the photo above. This is not happening. Instead, Tristan Thompson is preparing to screen for Balbay. So the pick for the picker action that is one of the central threats of the standard Flex is missing. What is up with this?
As I said above, the down screen pick for the picker is very hard to defend. But not every Flex coach uses it. In fact, one of the most well-known Flex practitioners, retired Maryland coach Gary Williams, does not really like to use the down screen. This down screen often results in a mid-range shot, whereas Williams prefers to work the ball inside. Additionally, in Texas' case last year, this down screen would have often taken Tristan Thompson or Gary Johnson away from the basket if Texas had been setting this screen. Rick Barnes' has historically gotten much of his offense on rebounds. A down screen in this set would take one of the best offensive rebounders on the court out of good rebounding position. So while Texas gives up the pick for the picker, the rest of this set will look quite nice when we see some of the other options below.
One to what happens next. In the next photo, we see that as Joseph makes the entry pass to Hamilton, Tristan sets a screen for Balbay.
You can watch the whole play here.
Often the entry pass to the post is not available, or for whatever reason the player with the ball on the wing chooses not to make it. In the standard Flex, the ball would reverse and the basic Flex pattern would just restart from the other side of the court. Texas does not do this. Instead, they flow directly into a sequence that uses another of Jerry Sloan's favorite tactics, the staggered screen. Let's reset, and look at a different sequence from the same game. In the photo below, the ball is at the top, labeled with the yellow arrow. The pass is preparing to go to Cory Joseph on the wing, while the Flex cut is also taking place.
In the next photo below, the ball has been passed to Cory Joseph on the wing, and a screen is being set for Balbay. In this case, instead of making the post entry pass, Joseph will reverse the ball to Balbay.
Now is where things start to get interesting. The ball has been reversed to Balbay (labeled with the yellow arrow). The man making the flex cut sets a back screen for Joseph. This back screen isn't really meant to free up Joseph; it is just the first of three screens that his defender will have to run through. Recall from my previous article that Sloan's offensive sets can call for this sort of initial nuisance screen prior to taking the same defender through a nasty staggered screen. And a nasty staggered screen is coming. On the opposite side of the court Wangmene and Johnson are preparing for a staggered screen.
The next image is the critical one. The staggered screen is set, and Joseph is running through it. This time, I have labeled Cory Joseph and his defender with yellow arrows. Joseph is running under the screen, while his defender is fighting over the top. In my staggered screen article, I also wrote about how the offensive player reads this screen. If the defender goes over top the screen, the offensive player pops out towards the the corner. That is where Cory is headed, which is the correct read.
If you watch the entire play, you see that Cory Joseph ends up with a pretty good shot. It just doesn't go down.
In the second half of that game, we see a similar sequence, except that the defender attempts to follow Joseph through the staggered screen, rather than fighting over top. I have again labeled both Joseph and his defender with yellow arrows in the image below. Notice that his defender is following him through the staggered screen. Joseph curls off the screen, which leads to an easy shot at the rim. Unfortunately that shot was missed. You can watch the entire play here.
Different reads off of the Flex cut
There are several other reads that can occur off of the Flex cut in the Texas offense. Let's set things up with the photo below. Joseph has the ball on the near side wing (labeled with a yellow arrow). Hamilton is in the opposite corner, preparing to make a Flex cut (also labeled with a yellow arrow).
In the next image, Hamilton is starting to make his cut. I have labeled both Hamilton and his defender. Hamilton's defender is working to beat him through the flex screen. Hamilton will notice this as we see below.
In the next shot, I have only advanced the video by a small amount. Hamilton is not making a Flex cut. Instead he makes a nice fake, and will be working off the naturally occurring staggered screen that is being set by Balbay and Johnson instead. Notice where he is relative to his defender in the photo below.
After Hamilton works off of the screen, we get the image below. Look where Hamilton is relative to his defender now. Another defender will help out to try to pressure his shot, but Hamilton ends up getting a pretty good look from the three point line. The shot just doesn't go down. You can watch the entire play here.
Let's take a look at one more read that can occur off the Flex cut. This time, we will see what happens if the help defender guarding the screener overplays on help. In the photo below, Joseph is the cutter. I have labeled him, as well as his defender (being screened by Tristan) and Tristan's defender (helping). In this case, the screen is very good, and the defender is trying to fight over the top of it. The help defender has effectively switched assignments, at least temporarily, to guard the Flex cut. This won't end well for the defense.
Look out, Pat Knight. In the photo below, you have two guys trying to guard Joseph, and no one on Tristan. This wasn't a straight switch, but even if Joseph's defender had decided to stay with Tristan, it would be quite a mismatch. Although not as much of a mismatch as Tristan vs. the rim. Hamilton sees it all, and throws a nice lob. Watch the whole play here.
Summary
If I wanted to sum this entire post up in five words, those words would be: Flex cuts and staggered screens. Rick Barnes implementation of this Flex set puts significant emphasis on reading screens. It also stacks a couple of serious threats back to back, making it tough on the defense to defend everything at once. In a future post, I will write about another set in the Texas offense, the 1-4 set. It is a mainstay of Jerry Sloan's system, and it also makes heavy use of Flex cuts and staggered screens, but with a few additional wrinkles.
20 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm still trying to figure out
why 3 of our best players declared early for the lockout.
A lot of people were relieved when Barnes implementing an actual offensive system. That’s one down. I hate to speculate on stuff like this because I don’t have any contact with the team, but is there something wrong with Barnes that’s the catalyst for these chemistry issues?
My source close to the program can beat up your source close to the program!
There's nothing to see here.
Really.
Barnes’ record in getting players to fulfill their NBA dreams is at the bottom of the list of criticisms. They may not be playing this year, but they got their high draft positions, likely good money, and a more secure NBA future.
Players making the NBA – even in a lockout – isn’t a chemistry issue, it’s part of Barnes’ job. All 3 going in the first round means they made pretty good choices. TT going 4th means he made a great choice.
by bevosbackside on Oct 5, 2011 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions
Blog porn
Can’t wait to read this more carefully after work. Awesome stuff, Reggieball.
75-37-5. Now GTFO.
Great set up for the season
Just to clear up the terminology, how does this compare to the so-called ‘UCLA’ system?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
A tiny bit about the UCLA cut next week
so probably better to tackle this question then.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Man this is absolutely fantastic stuff Jeff
Thanks for taking the time to put all of this together. Anybody who is dubious of our offensive system (I was one of them before Barnes completely revamped last year, though we reverted to our old ways down the stretch of the season) should relish this kind of analysis and have some hope that Barnes his headed the right way in his offensive ideals.
Connor Lammert and Jon Holmes will be great in this offensive system where they can set solid, tough screens and then be able to sprint to the perimeter for three. Julien Lewis should also thrive in this offense. Guys like Jaylen Bond and hopefully Prince Ibeh will be good in the screen and alley-oop game.
Others like Kabongo, JCB, and McCllelan will thrive more in the one-on-one offense that Barnes used to love.
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
JCB
I personally think that this stuff works really well for J’Covan. In my study of game footage, J’Covan often ends up wide open coming off of these screens. It seems that he really knows how to set up and use screens, and an offense based on making reads on the fly like this is well-suited for his talents. The guy has a feel for the game, and an offense like this really does well with someone like that.
I am thinking it could be a big year for J’Covan.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Don't really agree
He’s not a great shooter coming off screens, which I think is a huge part of the flex offense. I do agree that he is good coming off curls and setting up his defender because he’s a smart player, but I don’t think he’s athletic enough or a good enough finisher (like Augustin was) to compensate for his small stature in the paint. He misses a lot of layups by always trying to get fouled. Not much of a midrange game either.
His best facet is passing off curl screens to the big guy inside, generally resulting in close to a broken nose if it’s Wangmene.
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
JCB
Is a street player to me and excels when he gets to go manhood-vs-manhood against his defender.
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
My view right now on JCB
I have some nice clips of JCB working off screens. Coming next week.
My opinion is that he is probably a fair bit more precise on his cuts and reads than Hamilton was, at least in the games that I have studied carefully (Tech and K-State). Hamilton was actually sloppy coming off screens some of the time. (Again, we will see some examples next week.)
Agree that JCB is not the type who finishes near the rim. But he is a really good shooter, and seems to have a knack for coming off these screens so as to create space for his shot. An when he is open to shoot, he is very dangerous.
To me, JCB is the classic “gym rat.” The guy who just grew up playing all the time and just feels the game. He isn’t that tall and isn’t that quick. He is totally the guy who you look at and think, “how the hell will this slow, short guy hurt me,” and then he just kills you. Doesn’t hurt that he can shoot the hell out of the ball. And that he is basically without fear of any sort.
I think he can have a monster year this year.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Hmm
Well I agree with basically everything you said, except I’m less bullish on JCB’s shooting. I know he’s a “great shooter,” but I think mentally he doesn’t put himself into every shot like he should. Does that make sense? I felt like Joseph put himself into every shot, and Cove is spacey sometimes. He’s a fucking gamer though and I agree he’ll be around 17-18 PPG and a good deal of assists as well, despite Myck.
Basically, I don’t give a shit about whether Covan becomes a star or not (I mean, I would obviously love it). He is a big game player and I appreciate players with cajones muy largos. That’s what Brown showed against Arizona and I’ll appreciate him forever for that.
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
One comment on Kabongo for Blake, if he is still following this thread
I know basically nothing about his game. But he is pretty good with the ball, right?
This is just a personal thing for me, but guys who are strong off the dribble seem to get even better when they can catch the ball on the move. I don’t know how much of Sloan’s system Barnes has a handle on, but Sloan definately did great things with point guards.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
He's fantastic with the ball
But he’s a guy that works better when he can square up his guy and beat him off the dribble. Not the same player when he has to finish at the rim and use his size inside. And doesn’t need to really catch the ball on the move because he’s probably the quickest player in the country with the ball the moment he steps on a college court. John Wall’s the only player in recent memory (since Paul and T.J.) who has that level of quickness with the ball.
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
agreed
J’Covan’s ascendance this season is my primary hope for 2011-12 Longhorn basketball. I just think the dude could be one of the best players in the conference.
We all kinda turned on him when we found out what how petulant and immature he is but he was the difference maker for us down the stretch.
Great job.
Are you using Paint? If so, I think it would look nice if you used arrows and the line tool instead of the freehand pencil tool, which it looks like you are using. Would just be a little nicer looking. Doesn’t take away from the content though.
Good feedback
I am not using Paint. I am a Linux guy actually. Because I like things to be hard…
Good feedback. I am still figuring out the best way to do these things, and wouldn’t mind making my figures a little bit nicer. The changes won’t be in place for next week (my post is pretty much done), but I will get it worked in eventually.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Hopefully I will keep stuff like this going...
I am trying to mix and match the basketball stats stuff with the on-court tactics stuff. I want to find ways to use both approaches to really dig into this season for Texas. The stats, shot charts, and play-by-play data show us where to look, and then we go to the tape to understand. At least that is the plan as long as the work travel and other aspects of life cooperate. If they don’t then I will just be bombarding people with a bunch of graphs.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley

by 














































