Snap Shots: Creasing the Solid Cal Rush D
The Context
After a nice improvisational play by Cal quarterback Zach Maynard to loft a short pass to back-up running back CJ Anderson for a 74-yard touchdown that pushed the lead to 10 late in the third quarter, Arizona State needed a strong countering drive to stay within reach entering the final frame.
A 27-yard pass from Brock Osweiler to Gerell Robinson, followed by three consecutive runs from Cameron Marshall, set up the Sun Devils just outside the Golden Bear red zone.
The Play -- 1st and 10 at Cal 24
Arizona State lines up with running backs on either side of the quarterback and three wide receivers, while Cal counters in their nickel looks w three down linemen, three linebackers, and five defensive backs, with the safeties up close to the line of scrimmage and linebackers flanking the defensive ends.
The running back to the left of Osweiler goes in motion, drawing the strong safety outside in pursuit to stop the potential swing pass, while the zero tech nose tackle lined up over the center slants inside on the ASU right guard trying to execute his reach block.
Osweiler holds the linebacker who is the end man on the line of scrimmage and the ASU defender slow plays it to force the give read, while the playside defensive end Trevor Guyton, a real load at 6-3 and 280 pounds, attacks the right tackle head up.
Guyton gets held a bit here, but the real issue is that he's lost his run fit working in concert with the defensive tackle slanting inside and the linebacker responsible for dealing with a quarterback who isn't much of a running threat. Instead of sliding into the A gap, Guyton leaves the crease for Marshall to hit, a pretty significant issue given that the Mike 'backer misses his run fit as well with the slant from the defensive tackle really eliminating both A gaps due to his penetration. The center gets to the second level and walls of the Mike easily.
By the time that Guyton tries to spin off the block, no easy feat for someone that size, Williams has hit the hole hard and is looking at a great deal of green grass in front of him.
The free safety starts running his alley to contest Williams, but breaks down on a little shimmy from the ASU back and gets caught flat-footed.
Williams is faster at top speed than the safety is quick laterally, leaving Williams uncontested for the final 10 yards.
The Takeaway
There are some breakdowns here for the Cal defensive front in handling gap responsibilities and making the proper fits, with Guyton and the Mike 'backer seemingly not aware of how the slant from the defensive tackle impacts where they need to be. It's a pretty fundamental breakdown and one that costs a touchdown at a critical point of the game.
And though the Cal safeties mostly had a solid game, missing open-field tackles as the last line of defense is hardly the hallmark of a successful defense.
Oddly enough, despite a solid Rushing S&P+ ranking of 44th in the country and a similar ranking of 42nd in avoiding giving up rushes of 10 or more yards, the Golden Bears did have some issues giving up runs of 20 or more yards, which accounted for about 40% of all long runs and ranked 92nd in the country, a major statistical outlier for a team that generally performed pretty well defensively.
Almost half of those runs of 20 or more yards went for 30 or more, indicating that when Cal got gashed defensively on the ground, the breakdowns were pretty significant and probably the result of multiple players making mistakes.
What it means for Texas
Since Cal plays three defensive lineman who are all essentially the weight of a defensive tackle, it could be hard for the interior of the Texas offensive line to get consistent movement on the power-running plays like the iso and Power O that make up the backbone of the rushing attack.
Instead, co-offensive coordinator Bryan Harsin and the Texas offensive line may be better served running the zone scheme used here by Arizona State to get the defensive linemen moving laterally and take advantage of any issues in fitting gaps, which isn't stressed to the same extent on man blocking plays. Unfortunately for Texas, the best zone back on the team has a couple shredded ligaments.
Part of what made this play happen, however, is the motion from the running back that vacated the other safety and allowed Williams the opportunity to score a touchdown after making only one defender miss. Expect DJ Monroe to play a significant role for the Longhorns as a decoy with the same type of motion, just coming from a slightly different spot.
The other question is whether Longhorn running backs Malcolm Brown and Joe Bergeron can make the free safety miss in a one-on-one situation. It's not a particular strength for Brown, who has had some issues breaking long runs. Bergeron, on the other hand, has a bit more fluid hips that give him a little more slipperiness in those situations.
In terms of numbers, if Texas does want to use a fair amount of zone blocking, it would make sense to more heavily include David Ash in the gameplan to option off another defender to get better numbers in the box. Not forcing Osweiler to keep the ball doesn't make much sense from the Cal defensive standpoint, but expect a bit more coherent scheme with more preparation time against Ash, who could be given a keep read on those plays -- at least that's the play that makes the most sense for the Golden Bears.
As the Longhorns try to emphasize the running game and take pressure off of the quarterbacks and attempt to generate some opportunities for play-action passes, finding some creases against the stout Cal front and creating explosive running plays will be a key to offensive success for a group that plays poorly behind the chains.
30 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Osweiler is by no means mobile
But the threat alone prevented the playside LB from crashing down on the run. I bet if ASU runs that again, LB crashes for no gain.
We could run a similar look, which we have been out of Pistol with Monroe flanking the QB. We might be able to execute a similar run first, but could come back with it later with a swing pass or option to Monroe, preferably with Ash running the option.
Great stuff. Love the snap shot series.
Hook 'em! @michaelpelech10 on Twitter
by The Audit Horn on Dec 15, 2011 8:26 AM CST via mobile reply actions
One Question
The other question is whether Longhorn running backs Malcolm Brown and Joe Bergeron can make the free safety miss in a one-on-one situation.
Is it correct to assume Bergeron will be healthy by game time?
That's the hope.
The coaching staff has been saying that it’s a strained hamstring and while those are notoriously slow to heal, I think the odds are strong that he will be available to play with several weeks to heal after the Baylor game. There has been some speculation about whether he has a slightly torn hamstring, in which case the odds are lower. Considering that the coaching staff called it cramps after the Texas Tech, I wouldn’t rule that out, but that’s stating to get into the conspiracy theory realm.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 9:14 AM CST up reply actions
*starting
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 9:14 AM CST up reply actions
Great Stuff
Always interesting to see what the other side has to say about us.
Cal is very aggressive on D and is susceptible to giving up the big play, particularly on 3rd and long, much to the frustration of Cal fans. After years of the “bend-don’t-break” defense of Bob Gregory, fans had enough and wanted a more aggressive defense. Well, we got it with Clancy Pendergast, but I think most Cal fans would say the results haven’t entirely lived up to their expectations.
Statistically, Cal’s defense looks pretty good. But it has been mostly feast or famine the last couple of years, with a shocking number of blowouts.
Passing Down S&P+
is rather low for Cal ranked 50th in the country compared to some of the other metrics. You believe that to be because of hyper-aggressiveness blitzing in those situations? Has Cal been hit on some screens and draws in those situations to break off big plays?
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
In a word, yes.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 15, 2011 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
Ugh...
…..Stanford’s last drive after we pulled to within 7 (on a play which was like the Maynard pass to CJ Anderson but from the red zone) is particularly noteworthy that way. They burned us on 3rd and 7 three times on completely open screens for first downs.
Screens to the TE, yup. That’s exactly what I had in mind.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 17, 2011 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, we’ve been gashed on screens often this year. The Oregon game comes to mind. We gave up probably 8 plays of over 30 yards in that game, which is a product of oregon being a really high octane offense, and coupled with the referees complete unwillingness to make a holding call against them.
Good observation re that this play broke down when Guyton failed to hold A gap. This was not the only time that he failed to execute his assignment in this game, and asu was able to capitalize multiple times. The inside backer DJ Holt also was misaligned and filled the wrong gaps in this game often, as he did here as well. I don’t know why those two weren’t on the same page as the rest of the guys, but this game it was particularly evident. And our safety Cattouse, while coming into the year seemingly a good player, has regressed and frankly, looks lost out there at times.
Hans, Bubi, I'm your white knight!
Cattouse seemed to be the biggest weakness in the secondary to me.
I think it’s hard to big guys like that to have to fluidity necessary in coverage. If I’m Texas, I try to isolate him in coverage, but given how few receiver-heavy sets Texas runs, I’m not sure how possible that will be.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
I don’t agree exactly, Cattouse can be inconsistent, and is sometimes out of position (hence the looking lost part) but when he reads the play correctly, he’s solid.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
In my opinion it’s his failure to line up properly pre-snap. He sometimes gets too shallow when playing cover 2 for instance, and then gets burned over the top and outside because he’s looking to come up in run support when he’s got the deep half.
Hans, Bubi, I'm your white knight!
…looking to come up in run support on a pass play = not reading the play correctly, no?
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 15, 2011 7:49 PM CST up reply actions
more concerned
about forcing Cal into the nickle defense that is shown here. I do not think we will see much of that on standard downs.
You're probably right
We ran a considerable amount of nickle in that game due to ASU’s tendency to spread out up to four or five receivers. Considering Texas’ struggles in the passing game, I doubt we will run too many nickle packages outside of third and long. We’ll likely stack the box and force McCoy to beat us through the air.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
California Golden Blogs
by Berkelium97 on Dec 15, 2011 12:50 PM CST up reply actions
Does anybody remember the last time we ran a draw ?
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 15, 2011 12:00 PM CST reply actions
I think Jeremy Hills picked up a long first down
against Baylor running a draw. It’s in the playbook.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 12:28 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, that was like 3rd and 18 or something ridiculous. Baylor was totally caught off guard
I believe it lead to either the first or second TD of that game.
I think we ran one in a similar situation against A&M that went for 2-3 yards.
whats the pt
Draw is effective when DL are in a rush to get to the QB. Basically, it is a counter measure to keep the defense honest. In order to execute it you need to have a semblance of a passing game, so do not expect to see many
It would seem, with our less than stellar passing, that more draws would be obvious to Harsin.
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 15, 2011 1:09 PM CST reply actions
Agreed ...
It’s a safe call, too … and with the backs getting healthy I think it’s a good call.
I will change my legal name to "I. M. Harsin" if Texas scores on a Statue of Liberty or Hook-and-Ladder vs. OU."
by Distributor of the Football on Dec 15, 2011 4:19 PM CST up reply actions
I think we qualify for "a semblance of a passing game"
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 15, 2011 1:45 PM CST reply actions
i dont
have you watched or looked at this amount of bitching about our QBs? It is not effective. DL are not overly concerned about getting up field. LBs are not getting yelled at on the sidelines about getting the deeper in their drops. To run mis-direction you need to be able to have success in base plays or those plays will fail a majority of the times.
Have you seen?
The number of pass plays that Harsin has continued to call, without our semblance of a passing threat? I guess it works in practice.
lets disagree
I am of the thought that if you cant run it strong side, the counter is not going to work well. If you can not threaten the secondary and LBs with the pass the draw will not be successful, especially the LBs. If they are not sprinting into their drops the Draw is a wasted play.
Let's try to use the reply feature, folks.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Dec 15, 2011 4:12 PM CST reply actions
How ironic
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
hey come on now, what are you trying to do, put me out of a job?
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Dec 17, 2011 2:44 PM CST up reply actions








































