Texas vs Temple: Longhorns Basketball To Battle Experienced Owls Squad
Texas Longhorns basketball (8-2) returns to the hardwood on Saturday for a 1:30 p.m. CT tip with the Temple University Owls (6-2). Heading into this season I was pretty concerned about this match up, but Texas has caught a pretty significant break in catching the Owls without sharpshooting Scootie Randall (lost for the year) and 6-11 center Michael Eric, a force in the paint and rebounding machine who injured his knee in late November and will be out until January.
Losing Randall hurt, but the bigger loss is Eric, without whom the Owls are, thankfully, even more undersized in the frontcourt than Texas, and I like this match up a whole lot better than I did in the preseason. The Longhorns match up well with the Eric-less Owls and I like us to be advantaged in every way but two. But they're important ones: First, this Temple squad is more experienced than Texas, relying on a core of upperclassmen who made the NCAA Tournament last year, where they won a game before losing in double-overtime to No. 2 seed San Diego State. Second, and related, this Owls team is more tested than we are -- not only from last year, but this year, where they've faced a stronger slate of opponents, including three Top 50 squads (Purdue, Wichita State, and Villanova).
Join me after the jump for an introduction to Temple's personnel, and a look at the keys to the game.
Temple Owls Personnel
Even with the loss of Randall, Temple boasts one of the best backcourts we'll see this year, featuring three starters with length who can penetrate, shoot, and dish the rock. You may know the name of the tough and versatile Juan Fernandez (SR, 6-2, 180) following his game-winner at the buzzer to advance Temple to the second round of last year's tourney, but the Owls best playmaker is Ramone Moore, another 6-4, 180-pound senior who can stroke it outside (38% from three) or create offense on the bounce. Moore's their go-to guy, he'll play close to all 40 minutes, and he will school Julien Lewis or Sheldon McClellan if they're not sharp and paying constant attention on the defensive end. Rounding out the starting guards is Khalif Wyatt (JR, 6-4, 205), a physical guard who does a lot of things pretty well, and who like Moore I worry could get us into some foul trouble.
On the inside for Temple, the loss of Michael Eric really hurt, but freshman Anthony Lee (6-9, 205) has really stepped up in the four games he's started in place of Eric, grabbing 9 boards per game while providing some solid inside presence on defense. Starting alongside Lee is Rahlir Hollis-Jefferson (JR, 6-6, 210), who is significantly more developed offensively than Lee, but his lack of size hurts him as a rebounder. Unfortunately for the Owls -- and very helpfully for Texas -- that's literally all Temple's got by way of frontcourt players. If either Lee or Hollis-Jefferson sits, the Owls are playing four guards.
Keys to the Game
1. Which team will do a better job of attacking the rim and not over-settling for threes?
Although both Temple and Texas are good outside shooting teams, both also have length on the perimeter and defend the three well, and both are vulnerable to attacking penetration. Temple is allowing opponents to make a whopping 61% of their two-point shots this year, and they don't have the depth to defend the paint too aggressively to risk fouls. On the flipside, Temple's guards can really take a big bite out of Texas' advantages in this game if they can get Myck Kabongo or J'Covan Brown into foul trouble, and the Owls have the guards to do it.
2. Who will defend penetration better?
This was mostly covered above, but the team that better uses attacking penetration to get buckets at the rim and/or draw fouls will have the edge on Saturday. J'Bongo need to stay out on the floor, but both will be tested on the defensive end.
3. Which team takes better care of the basketball?
Limiting turnovers is a key to every game, of course, but I'll just note that if we take care of the basketball and avoid foul trouble, this match up is pretty favorable to us. We have the two best guards in this game, a deeper and better frontcourt, and home court. If we don't hurt ourselves with fouls and sloppy play, we're solid favorites to win on Saturday. Along with limiting our own ability to score, turnovers create easy opportunities for opponents to pick up a bucket. We handled a big-but-slow UCLA team quite well, but now we'll get tested against a team with more quickness, speed, and athleticism (which is weird to say). This is a big game for Kabongo, who struggled against the lengthy and athletic guards of Oregon State and NC State.
Prediction: Having made clear the factors that will make me start to sweat on Saturday, I like this match up a good bit more than I anticipated I would a couple months ago. I think we stay on a roll: Texas 74 Temple 66
Hook 'em
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
While some fans may overlook this game...
I hope our Young Horns realize how critical this game is to our Tourney hopes. To me this is our most important non-con game left because it is our best chance to get a quality win.
As of yet, we have 0 top 100 wins. If we were to lose to Temple and UNC we would need a hell of a run in Conference to up our resume. The Conference is no joke this year and few guaranteed victories will be available.
I think we get it done because its almost a MUST win at this pt in the year.
by HornsUpInLA on Dec 15, 2011 6:34 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Amen
This is a really important game when it comes to getting into the tournament. And I think you are right on about how tough the Texas schedule is going to be from here on out.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
so would going 9-9 in conference play be enough to get Texas in the tourney?
assuming we finish at 10-3 in non-conference play.
Depends on how those wins and loses come...
If we knock of Baylor, Kansas, and Mizzou that helps, but also a being mid-pack means it will have a ton to do with how the rest of the nation plays.
Indiana and Illinois are both undefeated in the Big 10, Big East will be strong again while hopefully the ACC, SEC and Pac-12 will cannibalize themselves.
Also has been a strong year for mid majors with Long Beach St, Creighton, Harvard and I think Murray State was also in the polls this week.
As of right now I think we need to go 10-8 and advance at least a round in the Conf tourney
9-9 would probably land us solidly on the bubble
Looking back over the last few years, Big 12 teams that have gone 0.500 in conference play sometimes go in, and sometimes do not.
Last year, Missouri made it, but Colorado just missed. Both were 8-8 in the conference.
In 2008, an 8-8 A&M team made it.
In 2006, Colorado actually missed with 9-7 in the conference.
In 2005, and 8-8 A&M missed. (With 21 wins and the 31st ranking on SRS. They got screwed.)
In 2004, a 10-6 Colorado (bad out of conference record), a 9-7 Missouri, and an 8-8 OU all missed.
So if we go 9-9 in conference, with a 10-3 out of conference record, we will have 19 wins, which would put us at risk. Our RPI will be pretty good with our schedule, but it is too hard for me to project right now.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Beat me to it
By any reasonable measure the Big 12 is the best or second-best conference this year (with the Big Ten), with a pretty solid gap to third place. We can definitely get in at 9-9, but I don’t know that it happens if we don’t pick up an impressive win or two (Kansas, Baylor, Missouri). Beating Temple would really be nice for resume purposes — spot on HornsUpinLA.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Forgot the Big East, Peter
Follow me on Twitter @GoHornsGo90
by GoHornsGo90 on Dec 16, 2011 3:01 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
The massive number of teams helps the perception of the Big East
The Big East is always going to have some good teams. But it will also have its share of teams that are not very good.
For my money, the Big East looks like it has three really top tier teams. Syracuse, Marquette, and Louisville. After that, you have a fair number of teams that look like they end up in the top 15-35 range. Teams like Georgetown, UConn, Pitt, and West Virginia. And then a lot of crap.
Missouri, Baylor, and Kansas are in the same ballpark as the top 3 in the Big East, if not quite as good, based on stuff like kenpom ratings and SRS.
The only teams in the Big 12 with an SRS right now of less than 10 are Texas A&M and Texas Tech. The Big East has 8 teams with an SRS less than 10. So while the top 3 teams in the Big East are somewhat better than the top Big 12 teams right now (and the difference isn’t that great), your schedule in the Big 12 is much tougher than it is in the Big East. The Big 12 doesn’t have Providence, DePaul, South Florida, Rutgers, and St. Johns to beat up on.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Of course the AP poll doesn't agree with me...
but I will take SRS any day of the week over the AP poll.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Ugh
NO respect for the Big 12 in Lunardi’s bracket there. If that’s national perception, we could have a problem.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Thats what I was going off of when I said we need to go 10-8
Our RPI as it sits right now is awful, in fact probably the worst we have had since Barnes first season on campus.
Still time to turn it around, but I think we need to acquit ourselves very well in conference play.
by HornsUpInLA on Dec 16, 2011 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
I can't imagine an embarrasingly empty Erwin Center for a home NIT game...
please, oh please, don’t let this happen Texas!
Our RPI can only go up
RPI is heavily weighted by strength of schedule. Link with the formula. And yes, the RPI rating is as stupid as it looks, but the selectors use it.
Our strength of schedule is not very good right now. But it will go way up when we start playing good teams. And from here on out, we will play a lot of them. Also, some of our opponents so far, particularly Boston University and UT-Arlington, will start to rack up a lot of wins once they get into conference.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Remember, the Aggies have done nothing...
…and have a nine seed. Lunardi apparently (with ease) targeted them as the most overrated team in the top 25.
If they don’t beat Florida tomorrow, they are in the same boat with Texas — and their n-c schedule is the worst in the nation without that game.
Texas does need to win tomorrow, much more than they need to play competitively at UNC.
Have always felt that they needed 10-8 in the league, but there are going to be about seven teams wanting at least that as well.
by BobInHouston on Dec 16, 2011 4:50 PM CST up reply actions
Defense
Your analysis of Temple’s ability to use attacking penetration which potentially gets our guys into foul trouble sounds like a pretty big concern. I know Rick’s a man-to-man guy but what about mixing in some zone to try to negate this penetration and dish offense? The flip side to this is that you say Temple has good shooters, so that is obviously a risk of a zone. Might be a pick your poison though if they are as good off the dribble as it sounds like they are.
The anti-zone position
Given our struggles on the defensive glass, and our lack of shot blocking on the front line, I just don’t think this team is cut out for zone. I don’t mind zone as a change of pace, but I don’t want to see this team (or most teams, really) playing very much of it. I will trade a bit of foul trouble for fewer offensive rebounds and lower effective field goal percentage.
Zones seem to work best when you have these three conditions:
1) A big front line that can hit the glass and hold there own there even when they don’t have great position. Zones make it hard to alway box everyone out, so you will need this.
2) Big guards who can close out on a few of the three point shots that zone teams tend to give up.
3) A big guy in the middle of the defense who can defend the rim. With a zone, the other team is going to get the ball in the lane. It is only a matter of time.
When we look at a successful zone defensive program, such as Syracuse, we generally find that they meet these three conditions. Syracuse gives up their share of offensive boards, but they at least sort of hold there own there.
From my view, you don’t want to really rely on the zone unless you have a lot of size. This team doesn’t have that.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Scottie Reynolds?
I think you combined Scootie Randall and Scottie Reynolds, the former Villanova guard. Scootie Randall is the guy who plays for Temple.
Ha, yes
I meant Scootie Randall. Must have had that other Philadelphia college guard in my mind when I typed. Thanks for the catch.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Looking forward to this game
As you have all mentioned in the comments and PB noted in the post, this is a big-time game for us. We missed chances as decent wins in New Jersey (Oregon St and NC St) and honestly, don’t have much of a chance in Chapel Hill. Beating Temple would be the only thing of note to point toward in our non-conference.
We have more than taken care of business over the last few weeks. And it has been fun to watch. However, this is where we start to figure out where we really are.
Like PB, I think we’ll have just enough to escape with close victory.
--AW--

by 





























