Time to organize
Yes, fellow BONers, it's time to organize. A boycott, that is. Wait, hear me out.
This boycott will not hurt you a bit. All you give up is the chance to watch a very, very boring game. The payoff? Just maybe, the end of this ridiculous BCS system.
At first, like most of you, I was upset by the idea of a rematch for the MNC game. Particularly a rematch of one of the most boring games ever played. Don't give me the story of a defensive battle. The first LSU - Alabama game was more the story of incompetent offense than great defense. Then I realized, this is actually for the best. The resulting lowest ratings ever for any so-called major bowl game, much less the Mythical National Championship game, may finally get the attention of the powers that be. We can only hope.
Actually, we can do more than hope. Join me in not watching this abomination of a game. Your sacrifice (if you can call missing another snoozefest a sacrifice) will be rewarded in the long run.
Boycott the game. Vote with your remote. Hit 'em where it hurts, in the wallet. Spread the word across all of college football fandom. If nobody outside of Louisiana and Alabama watch this crap, change will happen.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
51 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I endorse this message
The BCS is a traveshamockery.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
SECede?....Whoop(s)!!
As do I
Already decided I can give up watching this game (again).
by Longhorn11 on Dec 4, 2011 8:23 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Traveshamockery
is my new word of the day! Thanks
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 4, 2011 8:29 PM CST up reply actions
Anytime
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
SECede?....Whoop(s)!!
Sign me up.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Dec 4, 2011 8:45 PM CST via mobile reply actions
They won't care unless you're a Nielsen household.
I’m still not watching it on principle.
Even if your not a nielsen.they can tell how many people actually watched the game.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Dec 4, 2011 8:49 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
How so?
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"
― Isaac Asimov
by burntorangehorn on Dec 4, 2011 9:12 PM CST up reply actions
Forget how but they can tell if alot of people watch or if it is a low turn out. I do not remember learned it at some point.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Dec 4, 2011 9:15 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
It's all based on the very flawed Nielsen system
Not only don’t they collect metrics on what non-Nielsen people are watching, it would actually be illegal to do so. Plus this game will be on broadcast TV, and TVs don’t send signals back to the originating stations.
"Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'"
― Isaac Asimov
by burntorangehorn on Dec 4, 2011 9:50 PM CST up reply actions
Sounds like the CIA to me.
Big Brother is watching …
So, if you know someone who lives in a Nielsen household
You know what your duty is.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 4, 2011 8:58 PM CST up reply actions
No, no
Don’t blow up their house or their TV, just bribe them to watch something else. If they insist on watching the game, invite them over to your house, after tuning their TV to the History Channel.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 5, 2011 11:02 PM CST up reply actions
This sounds like some kind of Stepford Wives-type neighborhood you live in.
Are there any homes for sale right now? Those babes are hot … and obedient.
More than a boycott, we
should also organize a nationwide petition that registers our disgust with this abomination of a system. Similar to folks trying to get Nickleback off the Thanksgiving halftime show – see if we can actually get some press.
And also boycott the fucking game.
Boycott the Sugar Bowl, too.
WTF were they thinking? Virginia Tech? Seriously?
Clippers // Chargers // Rays // Boise State
"The Lakers do win games. But things can change." - Blake Griffin
I mean really, Va Tech?
The Big 12 got jobbed.
oh hail the Purple and White
All for it.
I’ll watch the Rose and the Fiesta. The title game is absolutely dead to me.
I've got this terrible pain in all the diodes down my left-hand side.
Bradley-Terry rankings for college football and basketball: because there aren't enough computer rankings already.
I have watched every national championship game the last ten years
I usually host a party for the game. I will not be even watching it this year. I plan on throwing a party with a replay of the 2006 Rose Bowl. That actually has a chance of being exciting.
Twitter and Facebook is the answer
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 4, 2011 10:31 PM CST reply actions
Frankly, all I want is the computers to be more prominently featured
and for the BCS bowls to take the top teams with matchups going 1vs2, 3vs4, 5vs6, 7vs8, and 9vs10. That way we have a more objective standard for picking the teams and no one gets screwed.
I’m still not watching the title game and the sugar bowl. That Sugar Bowl selection was utterly terrible.
TEXAS FIGHT
Doubt that will happen.
Pretty good read over at “And the Valley Shook” about the whole situation.
This quote really jumped out at me:
How does the BCS ensure it gets the two “top rated” teams? It has invented a formula that is the illusion of objectivity when really it is a fancy way of distracting the rubes that it is simply selecting the top two teams in the human polls.
Only once has the BCS picked a team for the title game that was not in the human polls’ top two, and it was so controversial that the AP crowned the team that missed the title game its champion. Oh, and then the BCS revamped the formula so that would never happen again
Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. - The Boondock Saints
Don't boycott; Occupy!
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
Not a petition. A National Pledge.
Someone needs to set up a Facebook page or a website for people who will pledge not to watch the rematch.
3rd Degree Longhorn
There is a Facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-With-Your-Remote-Boycott-the-BCS/123231487791121
If a man is alone in the woods and he speaks, if no one hears him,,is he still wrong?
51 "likes"
Sounds like the movement is really rolling. Sigh. Unfortunately, I don’t think anything will change. It’s like the people who bitch about the ridiculously high prices for parking, concessions, tickets, et cetera and the ones who complain about how much money pro players make and that they’re entitled. They complain about all those things, but they still go to the games, still buy merchandise, and still tune into the games on Sunday. The powers that be know this. People may complain incessantly, but at the end of the day, not enough are going to boycott to make any real difference, and most will still have their TV’s on the game.
Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. - The Boondock Saints
I have passed the link on to my son who (I shudder) is on the ACC boards as a student
Give it time.
3rd Degree Longhorn
No idea when the page started,,,we have time.
ACC isn’t so bad. Congrats on having one in college. Well done!
If a man is alone in the woods and he speaks, if no one hears him,,is he still wrong?
Thanks.
I am now watching UNC basketball. And cheering for them, except when they play Texas. Apparently they still don’t mention Mack Brown on that campus. My son has posted his Like.
Know anyone in Oklahoma who has an internet connection?
3rd Degree Longhorn
Ummm,,,yeah. Sorta.
Just sent the link to David Boren, Dan Boren, and a member of OSU Alumni Board. Will that help?
If a man is alone in the woods and he speaks, if no one hears him,,is he still wrong?
Two Best Teams
Clearly, I am in the minority, but I look forward to the re-match. Although it was low scoring, it was still an overtime game 1 v. 2. With the system we currently have, I think the 2 best teams are playing in big game.
Who are the 2 best teams?
Can you say definitively that ‘Bama is better than OSU? That’s what the BCS is for. To determine, on the field, who is the best team. LSU and ‘Bama have already played. What’s the point in the regular season if the BCS is just gonna guess who the best two teams are?
The first LSU – Alabama game was more the story of incompetent offense than great defense.
I stopped reading after that line. I’ll just say it: you don’t know anything about football.
Watch the game a few more years, learn something about….then have an opinion.
Well
Since I have been watching football for over 50 years, I guess I’ll never reach your high standards.
Maybe a better line would have been incompetent special teams. In any case, I would not want to watch that game again. I never said that there wasn’t great defense between those 2 teams, just that there wasn’t any offense to write home about.
So glad to have an expert here to correct me.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 6, 2011 11:26 PM CST up reply actions
Its just baffling to me that
college football seems to be one of the few sports in which incredible accomplishments go unrecognized by the hoards of people who claim to love the sport.
Tennis fans respect Nadal’s superhuman ability to put a high spin on his forehand, soccer fans recognize the “most-valuable” nature of a holding midfielder even though he’ll almost certainly not be involved in any goal, but in football, college football especially, if the ball isn’t crossing the goalline, nobody gives even half a damn. Its why no defensive player (or even an offensive player at a non-skill position) will ever win the Heisman.
Scoring a touchdown in college football is not really a great accomplishment. Yes you have to execute well enough, but in nearly every case a touchdown is scored because of a mistake made by the defense, or under more intriguing circumstances, a touchdown is scored because a clever offensive coordinator exploits a weakness in the opposing defense. But that weakness kind of needs to be there, and in most cases it is. Its why “everyone in Texas is an offensive coordinator” according to Mack Brown, because we all perceive different measures of attack that might be effective on a given day (ex: Damn it Harsin, why did you get away from the run game when it was working?!!) and so we’re agitated when our coaches don’t appear to be doing it.
But give me the offensive scheme that will crack LSU or Bama’s defense? Chip Kelly, Bobby Petrino, Dana Holgorsen, and Mark Richt are all ears. Hell, even Saban and Miles scored 40 points against everybody else, but couldn’t cross the goal-line against each other.
Watching the solid discipline of Alabama’s defense almost never missing an assignment, and watching LSU’s line consistently get enough pressure on the quarterback without blitzing so that the defensive backs can make aggressive game-changing plays gives me the same satisfaction as watching Barcelona pass their opposition to death or watching Michael Jordan frustrate a good perimeter defense.
Consistently frustrating very talented offenses for an entire season is among the highest achievements one can witness in sports. Consider how much we’ve adored Manny Diaz and his young play-makers this year, and yet that extraordinary unit is still capable of handing us a performance like the one we saw in Waco. But neither the Tide nor the Tigers has really had an off day defensively this year. Let that sink in for a moment. Its incredible.
But noooooo! I had to fall in love with the one sport whose fans shun its own greatness in favor of 52-45 overtime crowd-pleasers, which are in almost every case poorly played football games. It generally means there were so many exploitable weaknesses in both defenses that the OC’s had their pick of attacking strategies. But yay!!! Points!!!
Its Ingmar Bergman vs Michael Bay. One’s a work of noteworthy accomplishment, and the other masks its flaws with lots of explosions. But alas, the box office numbers indicate that I’m in the minority on that one as well.
I actually enjoy good defense
Just like you. And I agree that a lot of so-called shootouts can be bad football.
My main point here is that the proponents of the BCS claim that every game matters. Well, I guess they mean every game matters except when it’s inconvenient.
I don’t think we’ll find many people that disagree with LSU being ranked #1. And, while I think Alabama’s name gives them undeserved credibility over Okie State, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to put Bama #2. But if that’s the case, and LSU already beat Alabama on Alabama’s home field, then the issue is decided. Every game counts, so go ahead and crown LSU champions. No need to play another game.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 7, 2011 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
And, by the way
The whole point of this post was that we have a chance to change things. I’m not exactly asking people to skip watching a rematch between Texas and USC after the 2006 Rose Bowl.
I won’t watch the game. You will. That’s just a difference of opinion.
Insulting someone you disagree with? Maybe you should change your name to BrooklynAggie.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 6, 2011 11:33 PM CST up reply actions
Sorry
I just overreacted there. Don’t need to get down in the gutter.
.
by Longhorn in Canada on Dec 6, 2011 11:37 PM CST up reply actions
meh, consider us even.
This has been a bad week for college football fans in my opinion. In addition to my frustration outlined above, I’ve also become tired of people talking out of both sides of their mouths regarding the SEC.
When A&M bolted for the SouthEast we heard a lot of “If they were a middle of the pack team in the Big XII just think how bad they’ll be in the SEC! So long Aggies, have fun getting curb-stomped by all those heavyweights.”
But now that the BCS has dared to match two of those heavyweights in the title game, all I’m hearing is “The SEC isn’t so great!! Really there are only like, one or two good teams in that whole conference!!!!”
Never underestimate peoples’ ability to contradict themselves when it benefits their delusions to do so.
Not necessarily both sides of one's mouth
The SEC is strong. From top to “near” the bottom. They have a lot of solid teams. The Big12 is strong at the top and has some gaps as it goes down. It is not as solid a conference across the board. But is best of the big 12 an the best of the SEC on a par? That is a question that should be settled on the field.
One can really have their cake and eat it too sometimes.
3rd Degree Longhorn

by 




























