Taking Stock – 2011 Texas Football: "Lost in Translation"
Bill Murray is a funny guy. We all remember the movie. Famous over-the-hill actor is taking jobs where he can get them. Agent gets him an endorsement gig in Japan, yada yada, gets hooked up with young impressionable girl and finds his "inner youth".
As I watched Mack Brown yesterday during his first ‘media event' to discuss the coaching hiring carousel, effects of changes on current and future players, and the impact on all elements of the Texas Football environment at large, I was mesmerized just how far he has come in a few short months. And just how far he reached down inside to find the youthful enthusiasm that fueled his rise to the top of the CFB coaching rank.
Here's a man who now has publicly admitted to:
- "(Having) to look hard in that mirror and review who you are and what you are and start over."
- "(I am) really reenergized by going out and recruiting and seeing the parents and the high school coaches and the kids, and the fact that all the kids hung in there with us. I also told them (UT players) that I'd never been more excited, and that I was starting over. That's very important for them to know. Thirteen years ago I didn't know what I was doing, and now I've got 13 years of experience with new energy and a restart."
- "I was working really, really hard to try to make sure that we got the right coaches hired, to make sure that we were recruiting the upcoming guys - the seniors - and continuing to recruit the juniors."
- "I have been reenergized by the process. Hearing the positives from the players just as I come back and the excitement about the new start, the excitement about change in the offense, change in the defense and changeup in special teams and moving forward, has really been fun for me to see because it's really about the players. It's not about anybody else."
- "I do know that I felt like I had a hangover after the national championship game, and I don't know if I've ever taken a loss as hard. I think part of it was Colt [McCoy], part of it was it's just too hard to get there. We just barely missed in 2008. We just barely missed in 2009, and I don't think I did a good job of coming back out of it and getting a spark and getting the energy back to where I needed it to be and I didn't realize it. I just pouted for a while, and when you're pouting at 13-1 that's pretty stupid..."
- "It wasn't fun for us off the field, for Sally and I, but I didn't do my job on the field and I'm going to make sure Texas fans and kids know I'm going to go back and do what I'm supposed to do."
- "It was really challenging to hold it together. It was challenging to hire the new staff. It was fun to see how all the pieces fit, and I really enjoyed it. I mean it was funny, you all must have written some awful things about me, and I'd walk out and see people and they'd say, "Are you okay?" And I'd say, "I'm having a blast. What do you mean am I okay?"
- "It is great being out of my comfort zone because I'm back at work. New ideas. Fresh new ideas. It's fun for our fans. It should be fun for you all. I mean to get to know these new guys, and see a new offense, see the new defenses and what we are going to do on special teams. It's fun for the players. It's fun for the recruits. I think it's a great time for Texas football."
- "You got to make sure that you keep your foot on the pedal all the time. I think at one point that I must have thought that because we're Texas and we've won so much, we're just going to win. On bad years we'll win 10. On good years we got a chance to win it all. You can't think that. You have got to make sure that every day you get up there better be a goal to be set, and you better be moving forward to make [sure] that goal is the right one."
- "You have to earn the right every day to play. I don't know why we kept doing it last year. We kept saying it, but I don't know if we did it as much as we said it. You look back and sometimes you get yourself in a funk, and I think you get blinded by some things. And you get mad and stay down. You ended up missing some stuff, and that is my job. And that is some stuff I missed."
- "I think if you've got the edge you're having fun."
Yes, Mack Brown v2.0 appears healthy, refreshed, reinvigorated, rejuvenated, relaxed, focused, and mindful of the incredible delicate balances that are Texas Football. Make no mistake about it, the Mack Brown that DeLoss Dodds hired all those years ago, albeit reluctantly (sorry Gary Barnett), is back. Like a vengeance he's back. And with his leadership there should be no limit to what this organization can accomplish.
13 years ago I asked Coach Royal, I said, "What has been wrong with Texas football?" He said, "People were all over the place, nobody pulled together." I thought we got splintered a little bit as a fan base and a group last year, and it's time for us to pull back together and be like we were in 1998. When everybody - the fans, the alumni, our letterman, the high school coaches - when everybody pulls together for one, this is a powerful place. It's time for us to go back to work and make sure we get back to where we need to be.
Like many, I certainly was skeptical of his willingness to accept the facts for what they were coming off the abysmal performance last season. Shame on me. We all know Mack Brown for a man of character, honor, humility, and intelligence. There was not going to be any quit in Mack Brown. No sir. He cares to deeply for the institution that has provided him with so many blessings.
And make no mistake critics, this man is not in the game for a legacy. He's in to win!
So listen up everybody. Let's all buy in. Circle the wagons and cover the man on your right. And whatever you do, don't give up on this program, this team, this coach. The future of Texas Football is certainly as bright today as it has ever been.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"I think at one point that I must have thought that because we're Texas and we've won so much, we're just going to win."
Glad to see Mack understands. I’m on board.
See ya later, alligator.
Most important thing to me
is that Mack was able to see some of the not-so-great aspects of his program. And make changes. Some, we’ve griped about and pointed to. Others, we have no clue about.
My only concern, I suppose, is with the fans’ patience. Internal/staff issues weren’t the only issue last season. There were some serious talent deficiencies. Those, along with a mostly new coaching staff, could lead to another difficult season. I just wonder if vocal fans and big-time spenders who make the program ESPN-partner-worthy will howl for a coaching change if the program suffered though another down year.
My expectations have been re-set based on last year
We obviously are in a “re-building” year and we cannot expect them to go from 5-7 to 12-0. However, we do have talent on this team and we should be just fine and back to a bowl.
I think Bennie Wylie may be our best hire. Performance on the field starts with hard work in the gym. That confidence of knowing they have worked their butts off in the gym is going to translate to a competitive advantage on the field. It will give the players a new sense of confidence that they are not only more talented, but have worked harder and “earned” the W. I’m really psyched, but not expecting a MNC or anything crazy.
Agreed. I cannot wait to see the manbeasts that Sir Wylie runs on to the field Sept. 3.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
I believe that will depend on the perceived reasons for any shortcomings.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 1, 2011 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
I think it largely depends on how "down" the year really is.
If we go 5-7 (or worse?) again, I imagine there will be a lot of that.
If we’re 8-5, on the other hand, I think people will be somewhat more patient.
And it will depend on why or where we are deficient
If we have a bunch of injuries it will be ok. If it is GG throwing 2 or more interceptions every game it will get ugly fast.
On the other hand,
It really depends on how bad you think we can plummet. If we assume that we become a "good’ team again, then you ask the question: Do you really think “a good team” will lose to Missouri (without Gabbert), Kansas, Kansas State (always a toss-up), and Iowa State. That’s 4 definite wins from a good team. Then we have 5 more conference battles in TAMU Oklahoma, Oklahoma St. Baylor and TTU. Now Texas Tech is easily the most winnable of those games. Let’s say we are a “Good team again.” Then We should be able to knock off 2 of the remaining 4 teams. This would put us at about 7 wins and 2 losses in conference. That leaves 3 OOC games in BYU, Rice and UCLA. Even if we pencil in UCLA, which a “good team” shouldn’t lose to given their record, that means a 9-3 team, ranked in the top 25 with a nice bowl berth and a chance for a Conference championship berth given just how good Okie St, Baylor, Oklahoma and TAMU are. That’s much better
Tell EVERYONE you can about www.NFLLockout.com and how they can sign the Petition to Block the Lockout.
well their kryptonite last time led to mack brown
hopefully this round turns out as successfully.
Great write-up
It’s amazing to think back on the idiots who thought he should have “moved on” or been fired after the last season. They were a minority, but a vocal and an irritatingly moronic minority. Glad to see that it appears that they have shut up.
To be filled in later.
by Hopkins Horn on Feb 2, 2011 8:53 PM CST via mobile reply actions
It must be difficult being so much smarter than almost everybody else.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 3, 2011 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
It is a burden. I admit.
Oh, wait, were you not referring to me?
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
No, because you aren't smarter than almost everybody else.
You ARE smarter than EVERYBODY else.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 3, 2011 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
Well dang. I was sort of going to enjoy being part of the moronic minority.
I had my crayons out and ready to make my “Stupid” sign and everything.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
Funny how brilliance is a matter of perspective.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 3, 2011 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
It is difficult - heavy is the head, etc.
But I for one think he handles it with aplomb.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Did you mean "with an a-bomb"?
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 3, 2011 3:18 PM CST up reply actions
Sweet Niblets. I cringed. Ouch. Yeouch.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
You're right, Em.
Calling people “irritatingly moronic” is hateful.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 8:35 AM CST up reply actions
It would be much easier if certain people didn't refer to other people as moronic.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 9:04 AM CST up reply actions
Damn, Hopkins.
It seems a tad unfair and excessive to attach such insulting labels to those who thought Mack had lost his fire, especially when he admitted the same, and that he should move on. I wasn’t in that camp, but it wouldn’t be completely incomprehensible if I was. What if Mack hadn’t been reinvigorated and thus had continued with his recently self-proclaimed complacency through another one, two, or three years until the “minority” became the majority? Would you then label those among the would be majority “moronic” while proudly categorizing yourself in the intellectually elite minority?
I enjoy being contentious at times, this is no secret to anyone familiar with my history on this site, but that was crossing a line.
I don't want NO PART of yo' tired ass country club, YA FREAK BITCH!
In other words, you’re asking if I’d continue calling the idiots “idiots” if they had been proven right over time instead of being proven wrong so quickly.
Well, sure. And if Mad Dog lost a couple of hundred pounds, I’d label him “thin” instead of “fat.” But he’s not thin, is he? (I guess I’m being hateful again pointing out the obvious about him, I suppose.)
To be filled in later.
by Hopkins Horn on Feb 4, 2011 10:07 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I don't believe anybody has been proven right or wrong, yet.
Just because you say it, doesn’t make it so. The proof will be in the pudding (i.e., on the field). Moreover, I think you misrepresent what most of the Mack detractors were saying. Many said that Mack was slipping, but if he made certain changes (e.g., fired GD), he could regain some measure or all of their respect. I am grateful for most of Mack’s new coaching hires and his success in keeping all but one recruit, but one can certainly make a strong argument that the program would be in better shape now had he made some coaching and accountability changes a few years ago. Do you forget what GD cost us?
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
I am not misrepresenting YOU at all
You wanted Mack gone. Period. Do you need me to go find the link to your comment or are going to continue misrepresenting yourself as someone who merely wanted to see Mack make a few changes?
To be filled in later.
by Hopkins Horn on Feb 4, 2011 10:56 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Aw, hell, here's Paleface merely advocating for some staff changes
You know, at the very top of the staff.
To be filled in later.
by Hopkins Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:09 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Surely you recognize the difference between humor and serious content.
I have posted "I told ya we shoulda fired Mack, and “I told ya Mack could do it.” In my post “You have to have a head coach, before you can hire a new one,” I questioned Mack’s performance up to that point in the year for the purpose of initiating discussion and asked the following questions, "Is Mack on crack or will he bring them back? Can he still coach?" In the comments and replies I said:
making good changes indicates he has started coaching again.
I agree that blaming the coaches is appropriate, and I sincerely and dearly hope he gives reason to rejoice, not be irate.
I am just concerned that he has lost some part of the faculties necessary to be the kind of head coach The University of Texas at Austin deserves. I’m not saying that I know he has, but I have reasons to be concerned. Making proper coaching staff changes in the off season and allowing those talented coaches to do their jobs will go a long way toward demonstrating that Mack still "has it." I hope he does.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:14 AM CST up reply actions
Have a nice day!
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
SPLATTTTT,,That's a snowball from Austin. How's Houston?
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
Interesting exchange going on here.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
you know my heart is always warm for you
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
In my first winter at UT we had snow
at the end of the Christmas/New Year’s break. I remember walking to the movie theater that used to be on the north end of The Drag near The Hole in the Wall. On the way, we went through Eastwoods Park (tvr’11 and Dirty Work were not there) and had a snowball fight. One of my whiney friends claimed I had put gravel in a snowball that I landed in his face. Some people just love to make stuff up.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
Where IS tvr'11. He's MIA.
Was reading through the earlier comments on this thread. I will raise my hand as one of those that questioned Mack’s loyalty to HeWhoShallNotBeNamed. It was so obvious (to me) that he was literally killing the program and not performing even adequately as an OC and yet,,he stayed on. There were so many times I raised both eyebrows and wondered “why?”. I am also one of those that kissed the ground Mack walked on when he pulled us out of the dark place we were mired in prior to his arrival. Like you, I’m cautiously optimistic about the future for the Horns. The proof will be on the field.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
Coach Brown was in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" position
How can he justify “firing” his offensive coordinator of 15 years when 10 of those years were 10 win seasons? THERE WAS NOT FOUNDATION OR JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS ACTION. Only when the results provided justification did he act. As far as anyone knows, Mack may have wanted to make these changes earlier.
Bottom line is only Coach Brown knows. I say keep it that way.
- follow me @TXStampede on twitter.com
Does anybody think GD was Texas good?
If not, then Mack had both a foundation and a justification for letting him go, but of course, the decision would have been challenged in many circles based on the team’s overall success and the offense’s ability to score points. I agree that Mack was in a difficult situation. But I wonder if he really thought GD was performing to UT expectations or was just relieved that he could point to the players’ success to save his friend’s job. Maybe Cleve will write a tell-all bio.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 1:03 PM CST up reply actions
Who cares if anyone thought GD was good or not
He had ONE boss to satisfy. Sure he had his supporters and detractors. But in Mack’s world, the only thing that mattered were “W’s”, not style points. Greg was producing. Period. As soon as that stopped, Greg was resigned. Period.
As it turned out, I personally think the issue with Will affected Coach Brown more than the Coach Davis situation. Mack staked the University’s future on Will. He did not do that with Greg.
- follow me @TXStampede on twitter.com
What do you mean
by “the issue with Will,” and what kind of effect on Mack are you referring to? Just trying to understand your point.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 3:39 PM CST up reply actions
Something must have been lost in translation.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 7:11 PM CST up reply actions
Definitely. You speak a different language than I.
The issue with Will, if you are paying attention to the last few press conferences, is that it is apparent that Mack regrets the handling of HCIW tag. He now realizes that without definite timeline, the concept really does not bind a coach at all. Further, his attempt at creating continuity was prefaced on the fact that his teams would win 10 games a season in perpetuity. Clearly, without any uncertainty in my meaning, this did not happen.
I also think the manner in which Will left also affected Coach Brown in terms of putting him in an extreme leveraged situation with the recruiting class and the program. Note his comments in sharing the details of the FB banquet evening when the bomb was dropped. I’m sure he is hopeful of meeting up with the protege on the gridiron as soon as possible.
- follow me @TXStampede on twitter.com
thanks for the explanation
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 6, 2011 6:57 PM CST up reply actions
What I'm asking is
do you consider the subject of Mack Brown’s performance as head coach static and definite enough to summarily judge people based on their opinion of it at one point in time?
Since it is icy in Austin today, would you consider people who investigate human influence on global warming stupid?
Also, have “they” been proven wrong? Did I lapse into a coma and miss the Longhorns having 10 win seasons three years in a row?
I don't want NO PART of yo' tired ass country club, YA FREAK BITCH!
ah, the voice of reason
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Feb 4, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
What is this "reason?" I know of no such thing.
I don't want NO PART of yo' tired ass country club, YA FREAK BITCH!
SPLATTTTTT to you too. Isn't it pretty?
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
this one was for HT
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
It is pretty,
but it took me 20 minutes to get up a small hill due to my nearly bald rear tires. I woner why we didn’t have trucks out salting the roads overnight, like we would have had if we were, say, Chicago. Is the cost of dispatching trucks, drivers, and enough salt really more expensive than the lost productivity of all the people who stayed home from work?
I don't want NO PART of yo' tired ass country club, YA FREAK BITCH!
They sprayed some of the roads with something last night
but it was for snow I think. They didn’t plan on ice. They also only spray the major roads not the minor ones. I’m staying home. Beef stew and homemade brew going as we speak. Fire roaring in the fireplace. It’s a grand thing to have a snow day in Austin. I’ll be ready for the lake by Monday.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
Edit,,,homemade BREAD. Not brew.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.
I guess I have the workaholic's curse.
That does sound lovely.
I don't want NO PART of yo' tired ass country club, YA FREAK BITCH!
You'll get over the workaholic thing.
Couple of kidlets, 40th birthday,,it’s not a permanent state of mind.
There is not a situation or individual that cannot be improved by the addition of chocolate.

by 


































