Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Previewing the 2011 Texas Longhorns Football Season

BON readers: We have a favor to ask of you. Today we're treated to a preview of 2011 Texas Longhorns football, courtesy of Bill C. of the indispensable Rock M Nation. If you're a regular reader of RMN, as you should be, you already know the exceptional statistical work that Bill does, and in particular how he uses it to preview games, teams, and seasons. Well, Bill is about to begin previewing about 80 of the 120 FBS football teams, and the idea is for the previews to be both informative and accessible.

That's where you come in. Bill has asked to preview Texas here at BON so that he can get your feedback on the content and style of the preview format. Please, if you would, take a minute in the comments section to leave us feedback. Did you read the whole thing? Did you understand it all? Was it accessible? What did you like and dislike about it?  What's missing? What can be cut? Does the style and presentation work? If you encountered this on a website like sbnation.com would you have read it? And been pleased with it?

Any and all thoughts that you have: we want to hear them. Feel free to be critical, but be courteous and respectful. Bill's put in a ton of work on this, and it's a treat to have it to consume. Enjoy.

--PB--

Texas Longhorns 2011 Football Preview

By Bill C., Rock M Nation

For a long time now, Mack Brown has been known as the quintessential CEO coach. Find yourself a bunch of talented people, delegate, and stand back while the wins roll in. In that way, he is perfect for a program like Texas, which has the built-in combination of history and money of which few programs can brag. And clearly CEO Brown has brought home the results recently. Texas made two national title appearances in five seasons and missed out on a third by decimal points.

In 2011, however, Brown will have the unique experience of running a company with a brand new, and much younger, set of top executives. Some of his long-time assistants were put out to pasture, others left for better jobs. Some made horizontal-at-best moves. Gone are offensive coordinator Greg Davis ("resigned") and defensive coordinator Will Muschamp (hired away to be Florida head coach), along with five other assistants – offensive line coach Mac McWhorter (retired), receivers coach Bobby Kennedy (moved/bailed to Colorado), defensive tackles coach Mike Tolleson (retired), secondary coach Duane Akina (moved/bailed to Arizona), and strength-and-conditioning head Mad Dog Madden (slight change of responsibilities).

In their stead? Youth. Precocious, exuberant, new-blood-in-all-its-glory youth. Holdover Major Applewhite (32) and Boise State import Bryan Harsin (34) are the new offensive co-coordinators. Mississippi State’s Manny Diaz (36) is the new defensive coordinator. Coaching alone was not the entire problem with this past season’s Texas squad, but clearly Mack Brown felt he needed a jolt of energy with this new staff … and clearly he got it.

 Read on after the jump...

Star-divide

2010 Schedule & Results

Below is a look at Texas’ 2010 season. The 'Adj. Score' below is a look at how the team's offense and defense would have performed if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers, each given week. It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points, which is strangely satisfying.

Record: 5-7 (2-6) | Adj. Record: 6-6
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
Sept. 4 Rice 34-17 W 25.1 - 18.2 W
Sept. 11 Wyoming 34-7 W 28.1 - 18.9 W
Sept. 18 at Texas Tech 24-14 W 15.8 - (-5.2) W
Sept. 25 UCLA 12-34 L 16.3 - 31.7 L
Oct. 2 vs Oklahoma 20-28 L 31.2 - 17.7 W
Oct. 16 at Nebraska 20-13 W 26.9 - (-1.0) W
Oct. 23 Iowa State 21-28 L 20.9 - 34.0 L
Oct. 30 Baylor 22-30 L 21.5 - 22.7 L
Nov. 6 at Kansas State 14-39 L 15.2 - 30.5 L
Nov. 13 Oklahoma State 16-33 L 23.7 - 26.7 L
Nov. 20 Florida Atlantic 51-17 W 37.4 - 26.5 W
Nov. 25 Texas A&M 17-24 L 17.9 - 25.3 L
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 23.8
88
23.7
49
Adj. Points Per Game 23.3 89 20.5 13

Despite the losses of key players like Colt McCoy, Jordan Shipley and Sergio Kindle, Texas began the season ranked fifth in the preseason AP poll because, well, they're Texas. And from a statistical standpoint, that is actually rather defensible logic. In the oligarchy known as college football, the greatest predictor of future success is past success, and there was little reason to think that the latest batch of four- and five-star studs wouldn't fill in the gaps and lead Texas to another 10- or 11-win season.

Of course ... they didn't. The way the season was set up, Texas was looking at three seemingly easy wins and a dicey trip to Lubbock before the Oklahoma-Nebraska corridor decided their season's fate. It was easy to assume that the Horns' October 2 and 16 games would decide whether they were playing for another national title or 'settling' for a likely BCS bowl bid, and against Oklahoma and Nebraska, they actually played rather well. The problem was, they only truly played well against Oklahoma and Nebraska. They crept by Texas Tech despite an inept offensive performance, they were mauled by mediocre UCLA ... and following their inexplicable upset win in Lincoln, they lost five of six to end the season.

The Nebraska game was seen as both a jolt of energy and verification of what this offense could be capable of over the long haul, but really it was just a great individual gameplan against a Nebraska team psyched for revenge (after seeing this picture every night in their dreams for 315 nights) and vulnerable to overpursuit on every play. They used Garrett Gilbert on a lot of surprising keepers -- something that was really only going to work once -- and left Lincoln with a 20-13 win. Only once in the last half of the season did they score over 24.0 adjusted points or 22 real points. The defense was as solid as always, especially considering it was taking on the typical slate of solid Big 12 offenses, but the offense was putrid.

I am typically not a fan of firing coordinators. I feel blaming offensive coordinators and/or play-calling is both lazy and misguided about 95 percent of the time. It is a cop-out designed for misplaced rage. However...

...Greg Davis just had to go. Colt McCoy's passing downs magic act (we'll come back to this) disguised and bailed out an offense that had otherwise been trending toward underwhelming for quite some time. Standard downs struggles hinted at problems with play-calling and execution long before 2010, and when McCoy left, it was like taking off Vader's helmet.

(So in this analogy, I guess McCoy and "Colt McCoy's roommate™" Jordan Shipley were the badass suit protecting Greg "Anakin" Davis? Is this a great analogy or a horrendous one? I can't decide. Leaning toward horrendous.)

Thanks to inexperience, development, or any number of other issues common when dealing with 18-21 year olds, sometimes offenses are just inconsistent in ways that are somewhat out of an offensive coordinator's control. But in this case, the talent, even if overrated, was just too great for an offense to rank 88th in scoring and 89th in adjusted scoring. Texas' 2010 offense was just plain bad, and a change was gonna come. (Sam Cooke must have been a Texas football fan.)

Offense

What is S&P+? Think of it as an OPS for football. The 'S' stands for success rates, a common Football Outsiders efficiency measure that basically serves as on-base percentage. The 'P' stands for PPP+, an explosiveness measure that stands for EqPts Per Play. The "+" means it has been adjusted for the level of opponent, obviously a key to any good measure in college football.

Category S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 98 95 102
RUSHING 73 66 77 Adj. Line Yards:
PASSING 107 102 110 80th
Standard Downs 86 84 84 Adj. Sack Rate:
Passing Downs 93 61 107 42nd
Redzone 106 97 112
Q1 Rk 83 1st Down Rk 81
Q2 Rk 94 2nd Down Rk 102
Q3 Rk 98 3rd Down Rk 78
Q4 Rk 68

As jarringly bad as Texas' overall stats were, what might have been even more jarring was the complete and total lack of big-play potential. If this were purely a bad-play-calling, bad-coordinator issue, we might have expected the stats to play out like this with the talent Texas' supposedly has on scholarship: poor success rates, poor standard downs success (I often call standard downs the "play-calling downs" or "game-planning downs," since once you get to passing downs, the gameplan goes out the window), often bailed out by big plays or passing downs success. And to be sure, Texas had the success rates and standard downs part down pat. But the big plays never bailed them out. If not for Kansas (oh, poor, pathetic Kansas), Texas would have had the worst PPP+ rankings in the Big 12, and that is both inexcusable and baffling.

Was it youth? Obviously bad things sometimes happen with a first-time starter at quarterback; plus, by the end of the season, Texas was starting a true freshman (Trey Hopkins) at left guard and had plenty of true and redshirt freshmen scattered throughout the depth chart. But at the same time, there was a decent amount of experience, too; the tackles were both three-year lettermen, the running backs were experienced, and receivers like James Kirkendoll and Malcolm Williams have seemingly been around forever. (Amazingly, Williams still has eligibility to use in 2011. No idea how that's possible.)

So if it wasn't experience ... was it talent? Did Texas, TEXAS!, just not have the horses?

We'll see soon enough, of course. A lot of name-brand contributors return for Harsin and Applewhite. Gilbert will be a junior (and if he just isn’t up to snuff, Connor Wood and Colt McCoy’s brother Case are hovering behind him in this "wide open competition"). Unless your name is Carson Palmer, you make your biggest leaps between years one and two, and between years two and three, so whatever Gilbert is going to be, he’ll be most of the way there in 2011. He’ll have the whole stable of running backs of different sizes – big Cody Johnson, fast Fozzy Whittaker and D.J. Monroe – along with a good portion of his receivers (everybody but Kirkendoll and John Chiles, who combined for 81 catches and 1,125 yards but, let’s be honest, were quite replaceable) and the interior of his offensive line. Offenses as bad as Texas' don't bounce back with any major magnitude in just one off-season, but if the Horns can just get back to "decent" in 2011, and (as we'll see below) if they can get a few more bounces, the defense should be more than capable of winning a lot of games.

Defense

Category S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 23
9
38
RUSHING 38
19
52
Adj. Line Yards:
PASSING 11
5
20
27th
Standard Downs 28
15
35
Adj. Sack Rate:
Passing Downs 8
2
15
2nd
Redzone 62
75
64
Q1 Rk 18 1st Down Rk 18
Q2 Rk 35 2nd Down Rk 12
Q3 Rk 33 3rd Down Rk 39
Q4 Rk 6

First things first: Texas' defense was not the problem in 2010. Texas fans got frustrated with the D at times, but that was most likely because they had long since given up on the offense and expected the defense to make all the plays. That said, the Horns gave up more big plays than the typical Texas defense should. The front seven was rock solid, especially when it came to the pass rush, but despite starting nine juniors and seniors, they suffered enough breakdowns to cause problems. Once they had a team leveraged into passing downs, they teed off as well as ever, but they were vulnerable in standard downs, particularly against the run. They must replace both starting ends -- Eddie Jones and Sam Acho -- but ... good lord, they sign about 26 five-star defensive ends in every recruiting class. Some work out better than others, but between soon-to-be sophomores Jackson Jeffcoat and Reggie Wilson, incoming stud Cedric Reed, and whatever other former four- and five-stars they have clattering around on the depth chart, they should be fine in this regard.

In baseball, they say defense matters most up the middle (catcher-2B-SS-CF). If the same could be said in football, Manny Diaz will like what he has to work with in 2011. Tackles Alex Okafor, Kheeston Randall and Calvin Howell return, as do middle linebacker Emmanuel Acho (more like Emmeanuel ... amiright? Anyone?) and safeties Blake Gideon, Christian Scott and Kenny Vaccaro. Corners Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams (early entry) depart, but there are options aplenty, and a great front seven can work wonders for new cornerbacks.

Coming out of the SEC West, Diaz has a lot of both recent experience and relative success against the spread. Like Kansas’ defense does in basketball, Texas will attempt to make offenses’ choices for them and force them to call certain plays to certain areas of the field. Diaz's MSU defenses were outstanding in standard downs (seventh in Def. Standard Downs S&P+) and adept at leveraging teams into less-comfortable passing downs. In other words, his defense in Starkville was good in all the ways Texas needed to be good and wasn't last season.

Texas' 2010 Season Set to Music

A Tribe Called Quest's "What?" Because there are no songs entitled "LOL, Whut?" and because "What the F***" by Lil Scrappy is not on my iPod.

And because I have no idea who Lil Scrappy is.

Fun Stat Nerd Tidbit

In 2008 and 2009, Texas' offense was actually better on passing downs (2nd-and-8 or more, 3rd-and-5 or more) than on standard downs. Let that sink in a bit. They succeeded more on 3rd-and-8 than 1st-and-10, better on 2nd-and-9 than 2nd-and-3. Colt McCoy pulled rabbits out of his hat so often on passing downs (thanks in part to magician's assistants Quan Cosby and Jordan Shipley) that the Horns came within decimal points of back-to-back BCS title game appearances despite being only good on standard downs (25th in 2008, an improved 13th in 2009) instead of great.

Heading into 2009, I expected Texas' offense to slide because they were too disproportionately good on passing downs. I compared it to teams being a little too good at hitting with runners in scoring position. (In other words, I compared the 2008 Longhorns to the 2003 Kansas City Royals. Tell me again why I get to write for respectable organizations?) It turns out, disproportionate success on passing downs is tied as much to quarterbacks as to luck. With McCoy gone, Garrett Gilbert couldn't pull off the same tricks. He was Gob Bluth to McCoy's Criss Angel.

Summary and Projection Factors

Below is a small handful of projection and change factors most pertinent to the Football Outsiders' preseason projections you will find in this summer's 2011 Football Outsiders Almanac.

Four-Year F/+ Rk 11th
Five-Year Recruiting Rk 3rd
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* -12 / -1
Approx. Ret. Starters 13
Yds/Pt Margin** +3.4

* Adj. TO Margin is what a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles and unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.

** Phil Steele has long tracked Yards Per Point as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive Yds/Pt Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.

If the coaching staff gels even halfway, signs point to Texas bouncing back like round ball. They recovered only 17 of 56 fumbles that took place in their games, a staggering 30.3 percent; in the previous five seasons, only five teams (2007 Wyoming, 2008 Florida, 2009 Florida, 2007 Western Michigan, 2007 Tennessee) recovered fewer than 30 percent of all fumbles. While it's not a guarantee that Texas will automatically fall on more bouncing balls in 2011 (Florida did, after all, land on this list in 2008 and 2009), odds are still pretty good. If they had recovered 50% of all fumbles, that would have made a staggering difference of almost plus-1 turnovers per game, and in a season where they lost four games by eight points or less, that could have made a significant impact. Meanwhile, the Yds/Pt Margin suggests that Texas' offense was almost comically inefficient and/or unlucky. They are likely to rebound in this category, too, at least a bit.

So if Texas a) brings in another strong recruiting class, b) gets a jolt of energy from a young, hungry group of new assistants, and c) gets a normal number good bounces after a year in which they got none, then there's little reason why they won't be a Top 15 team again in 2011. All the pieces are there. But they might have to settle for improvement defined as "8-4 and an Alamo Bowl bid" if the players don't quickly figure things out under new management, or, of course, if those four-star offensive players just simply aren't as good as their Rivals rankings suggest.

I assume the best for Texas in 2011, but it would be silly not to at least acknowledge the worst. When other talented teams (other Texas teams, for that matter) have a "down season," it means 9-3 and 'only' a Cotton Bowl (or, in other conferences, Outback Bowl or Chick-Fil-A Bowl) bid. Texas' 2010 fall was alarming in its magnitude, no matter what kind of bad coaching and bad breaks were at hand. And no matter how "re-energized" Mack Brown says he is now, there is no guarantee that Texas will simply bounce back in 2011 like nothing happened. FO's 2011 projections will almost certainly have Texas back in at least the Top 20 ... but it will be a high-risk projection, to say the least.

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Three Points?

Mar 2007 from Lion Of Vienna Suite - 4 comments

Quick Post

Sep 2009 from Lion Of Vienna Suite - 1 comment

Comments

Display:

Wow.

There’s a lot here. I must first answer PB’s question with “no,” I have not YET read it all—but I am leaving it open and will finish when I am done with my law school reading. But the main feedback I have is that you too often see statistic-heavy pieces that require you to know what the acronym flavor of the month stands for and understand its significance, and probably have done your own statistics-heavy writing or research in order to follow along or even want to read past the first paragraph.

Not so with you; I love this piece because you weave the stats in with all of the story-lines that the casual (ok, maybe not casual; let’s say story-driven rather than stats-driven) Longhorn fan is already thinking about. How will the new coaching staff work together? Your answer doesn’t assume that the numbers are everything; it assumes that the numbers are helpful tools in analyzing a team, but that there remains an inherently human element in sports that can only be “previewed” with a certain amount of pop psychology.

And then of course you employ the classic “Sports Blogger!” voice—big headlines about the season set to music, link to Youtube of Jay-Z, tangents that are specifically referred to as “nerdy;” all the stuff that many MSM types have decided to steal from many among your ranks.

I give it an A. Please come back soon.

by 40AS on Feb 7, 2011 3:52 PM CST reply actions  

Seconded.

He has a fantastic writing style to boot. Pleasure to read.

Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.

by pleaseplaykindle on Feb 7, 2011 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow, cubed

Fabulous stlye, great stats & explanations. I especially loved:
  “In 2008 and 2009, Texas’ offense was actually better on passing downs (2nd-and-8 or more, 3rd-and-5 or more) than on standard downs. Let that sink in a bit. They succeeded more on 3rd-and-8 than 1st-and-10, better on 2nd-and-9 than 2nd-and-3. Colt McCoy pulled rabbits out of his hat so often…”
  This is something I intuitively believed but couldn’t confirm. In retrospect it explains perfectly how our offense, because of a few remarkable players, functioned at a much higher level than should be expected.
  Really enjoy your work.

by ole tnhorn on Feb 7, 2011 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

I always felt that McCoy completely carried that team that year (and should have won the Heisman, but that’s another post) and now I have numbers! yippee!

I’m not a graph/chart person, so I was intimidated by the charts, but the explanations were great and completely readable. Please continue doing this!

by longhornfan7628 on Feb 8, 2011 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Great read

I think its perfect. Easy to read, and I am a little distracted at work too.

Great statistical analysis as well. I really can’t think of anything to add at all.

Hook 'em

by blazzinken on Feb 7, 2011 4:02 PM CST reply actions  

Great piece, much appreciated.

It’s always nice to read intelligent analysis from outside the burnt orange echo chamber.

by ctex80 on Feb 7, 2011 4:11 PM CST reply actions  

Yes, I read it all.

I find it scathingly on-target, especially as regards the clusterf—- that was our offense last year, and the price the defense paid for that. Some of the metrics make perfect sense. Actually, most do. Some make me work harder than my mental faculties allow. The impact that our passing-down success had on the 2008 and 2009 won-loss records is highly educational. I sorta knew Colt and Co. were better than most, but I had no idea we were so out of the statistical norm. As a former editor, there are 47 places I could cut, trim or tighten. Overall, though, I think this is an accurate and comprehensible account or where we were/are/can be.

Points I’d quibble with:

*Defensive strength up the middle — Gideon’s experience is not the plus you think it is; he’s vulnerable to everything unless he has all-star talent around him . . . the second tackle spot is weak/unsettled/vulnerable . . . Acho is not a true MLB, and there’s not an experienced one in the program . . . Scott had a miserable 2010 season. . . . those close to the program have known Texas could be run against for 3-4 years; until 2010, nobody tried (or we had safe leads and it didn’t matter).

*No mention of the utter inexperience at the critical cornerback position. It’ll be two second-year sophomores, 1 or 2 true freshmen, maybe one third-year sophomore (Barnett) who has barely been on the field because of injuries.

*The hideous weakness that is our offensive tackle situation. Even if reasonably competent players (Walters and Hopkins, if they shift from guard; Kelley; Poehlmann, if he’s healthy; one of the incoming freshmen) man the tackles, we’ll be almost totally without experience at the positions.

**The total unknown that the new offensive staff offers.

**The massive amount of youth that will be in — often at the top of — the depth chart. This is especially true at running back, cornerback, defensive end, and in the O-line (with the exception of David Snow and Tray Allen).

**What we’ll be on special teams after an utterly dreadful performance in that are in 2010.

Leaning toward horrendous. Agreed. Flush it.

If not for Kansas (oh, poor, pathetic Kansas), Texas would have had the worst PPP+ rankings in the Big 12, and that is both inexcusable and baffling. Well, yes . . . but Texas was one of four conference teams not qualifying for a bowl. The ’Horns lost to Iowa State which, by logic, makes UT No. 10 in a 12-team conference (Texas did not play Kansas or Colorado).

… good lord, they sign about 26 five-star defensive ends in every recruiting class. . . .between soon-to-be sophomores Jackson Jeffcoat and Reggie Wilson, incoming stud Cedric Reed, and whatever other former four- and five-stars they have clattering around on the depth chart, they should be fine in this regard. Here’s the problem: This is all the DEs they have on the roster, unless players like Dravannti Johnson (OLB) or Alex Okafor (DT) are moved to end. On quality, I agree.

Sorry. Should have made this a separate post.

by edsp on Feb 7, 2011 4:20 PM CST reply actions  

glad you caught the Kansas line too...

I haven’t finished yet just wanted to make sure someone else caught it.

by TowerPower on Feb 7, 2011 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the responses, everybody...

…will just leave a ton of individual responses instead of trying to summarize in one huge comment at the bottom.

  • I could have sworn I mentioned the iffy offensive line in there somewhere, but alas, I did not. I’ve been hard on them for a couple of years, and I intended to drop a “a nice OL coach could be a very good thing” line.
  • “Texas was one of four conference teams not qualifying for a bowl. The ’Horns lost to Iowa State which, by logic, makes UT No. 10 in a 12-team conference (Texas did not play Kansas or Colorado).” The point was about explosiveness in particular — when breaking things down between efficiency and explosiveness, one would expect UT to have had far too much athleticism to finish 11th in that specific rating. Efficiency is quite a bit about execution, while explosiveness is quite a bit about athleticism, and there’s no reason for Texas to be lacking in athleticism.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Excellent as usual

We’ve been over the wide statistical gap between our offense and defense several times here, and it’s not pretty, to say the least.

One thing I’d ask: Are these stats adjusted for “close games?” Our offense was horrid, but it looks even worse when you discount some of those late, garbage time rallies we saw against K-State, OK State, and UCLA.

We’re actually a little thin at DE at the moment, maybe not so much for this upcoming season but when projecting past that. Our defense wasn’t the main problem last year, but this year’s defense may undergo some growing pains, particularly the secondary.

by TheElusiveShadow on Feb 7, 2011 4:27 PM CST reply actions  

Oh, and thanks for pointing out how good Colt McCoy was

As you will see here, not everyone is rational enough to see that.

by TheElusiveShadow on Feb 7, 2011 4:31 PM CST up reply actions  

That guy is a complete moron.

2010/11 Final BCS* Standings
1. Auburn 14-0
2. TCU 13-0
*Wasn't this system designed to prevent this from happening?

by Mulliganville on Feb 7, 2011 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

some questions, some suggestions

The “adjusted score” seems a bit counterintuitive or maybe is not explained well enough. Why is it that based on the “adjusted score” Texas would have beaten two of its toughest opponents (OU and NU) but still have lost to BU and KSU? It would seem to me that the close score of the RRR game and the surprise win in Lincoln were anomalies that, if the teams had played together 10 times, would have only occured 2 or 3 times out of those 10. On the flip side, Texas should have had a much better showing against KSU and Baylor aside from a turnover-prone offense.

As a suggestion, would it be possible to provide a benchmark or context for Adjusted Record, S&P+, and PPP+? For instance, how did other teams in the Big 12 fair based on Adjusted Record? Should OU still have won the south? Should A&M have lost 3 more games? For the S&P+ and the PPP+, how did the rest of the Big 12 fair in these rankings? This would put us into the proper context with our conference – i.e. Texas was unlucky and OU extremely fortuitous recovering fumbles. Another way to look at this would be to see these numbers compared to prior years. And, just out of curiousity, how did top teams like Auburn, Oregon, & Stanford perform?

I thought the weakest area of the write-up had to to do with personnel. DE is a weakness going into next year, not a strength. Jeffcoat is a budding star, Wilson and Reed are raw at best and unknown at worst. Our RBs are closer to an “ASPCA shelter” than a “stable”.

Overall, I read the whole thing and enjoyed it and I’d be curious to see similar objective write-ups for other teams of interest.

by BMG on Feb 7, 2011 4:33 PM CST reply actions  

My goal...

…was to provide the most succinct explanations possible so that people didn’t have to follow a bunch of links to understand everything. I actually removed a couple of links at the end, just to see if my explanations could stand by themselves … apparently that wasn’t a smart move, eh?

The “Adjusted Score” concept is asking the question “How would Texas (or anybody else) have done if playing a perfectly average opponent each week instead of whoever they played that week?” So saying they would have beaten OU/NU but still lost to BU/KSU is incorrect. The idea is that if they’d played an average opponent the week they played OU, they’d have won. The way they played against Baylor, they’d have lost an “average” opponent. It’s a way of judging teams in a vacuum, but clearly the quick definition needs a bit more elaboration.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Great Read

We must love punishment….reliving the nightmare that was 2010…one possible disagreement is giving the defense a total pass…this unit gave up far too many big plays ( rushing TD’s of 38, 29, 69, 34, 84, 48 and 20….passing TD’s of 59, 30, 67, 47 and 56 yards)….and these are just the TD’s!…onward to 2011

by rcpcrcpc on Feb 7, 2011 4:42 PM CST reply actions  

The safeties always seemed out of position to make the play.

I was so sick of seeing us just get huge runs up the middle because no one was back there to guard the last level of defense.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Feb 7, 2011 7:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Likewise

but I would say the front seven contributed a lot to that. While I agree with the writer that they were good at times they also had major breakdowns that put pressure on the safeties to make plays, something they didn’t do. Those runs up the middle drove me crazy. That and not being able to run on third and two.

We have a 12th man and he's Bryan Harsin

by SpiritOfTheFedora on Feb 9, 2011 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Offense....
But at the same time, there was a decent amount of experience, too; the tackles were both three-year lettermen, the running backs were experienced, and receivers like James Kirkendoll and Malcolm Williams have seemingly been around forever. (Amazingly, Williams still has eligibility to use in 2011. No idea how that’s possible.)

I have problems with this line, 1st of the OT’s only Hix was really experienced and we all knew how bad Mitchell was and most wanted Paden Kelley to play (I assume on Mitchell he probably saw SR on the depth chart and assumed experience and I don’t think Mitchell was a 3 yr letterman), 2nd we haven’t had a truly experience RB either RB by committee doesn’t allow for much which is an obvious flaw in the old game plan, and finally the old WR have never been very reliable while yes they’ve been here they are no Shipley substitute.

by TowerPower on Feb 7, 2011 4:47 PM CST reply actions  

He’ll have the whole stable of running backs of different sizes – big Cody Johnson, fast Fozzy Whittaker and D.J. Monroe – along with a good portion of his receivers (everybody but Kirkendoll and John Chiles, who combined for 81 catches and 1,125 yards but, let’s be honest, were quite replaceable)

Add in Malcolm Brown coming in next year to the RB’s and a mention of Mike Davis in the WR would be appropriate here, since he’s awesome.

by TowerPower on Feb 7, 2011 4:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Opps missed the questions

Yes read it all and understood it all.

I think when talking about our staff mentioning the average age of them moving from 50’s to 40’s is important. Also I think when talk about Defense mentioning that we had a weak depth chart at DT’s and how poor we did against the rush would help give a better overall approach to our D troubles, also I think it should also be mentioned how the loss of Earl Thomas to the NFL greatly weakened our pass D. Good read I would love to see others like this especially OU/A&M.

by TowerPower on Feb 7, 2011 5:02 PM CST up reply actions  

As a whole, I want to avoid talking about incoming recruits...

…just because a lot of them, even the five-star kids, take a little while to get acclimated. Obviously Malcolm Brown could explode right out of the gates, but he’s as or more likely to be just good, or even average, at first. We typically overestimate the impact of newcomers, or, to put it another way, we tend to guess wrong in picking which newcomers will make a huge impact. Recruiting matters (and plays a role in our projections) because of the depth it provides, not typically because of any one player.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:39 PM CST up reply actions  

read all of it

only part I didn’t understand was the purpose of the adjusted score?

Also, if you’re pointing to Alex Okafor’s return at DT as a strength, you’re looking at stats and ignoring reality on the field. Okafor is too small at DT, and made running up the middle on texas all too easy last season. I would also say that texas needs improved play from their DEs and OLBs; they’re outside contain was slower than I’ve seen in years.

by Beergut on Feb 7, 2011 4:52 PM CST reply actions  

I hate how you do this.

Beergut Argument Template (patent pending):

If you think [opinion Beergut disagrees with] then you [are doing/thinking something clearly ridiculous].

Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.

by pleaseplaykindle on Feb 7, 2011 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

ok, please

defend the position that Alex Okafor, at 6’4, 258 lbs, is not undersized for a 3 tech?

Bill is looking at the stats and number of returning starters, and thinking “strength up the middle”, when it means anything but.

by Beergut on Feb 7, 2011 6:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with Beergut on this one...

I hope he moves to the outside this year.

by TowerPower on Feb 7, 2011 6:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I meant in general.

Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.

by pleaseplaykindle on Feb 7, 2011 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Rather than going after him in general, read his posts first

I’ve noticed he does give some gems, even if he is an aggie.

TEXAS FIGHT

by Darklust on Feb 7, 2011 7:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree completely.

When he’s not talking about Texas he’s pretty legit.

Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.

by pleaseplaykindle on Feb 7, 2011 8:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not a Football Outsider reader...

… so maybe I’m not in the target audience, which would render my feedback less useful. That said,

- “Adjusted” scores needs more explanation. Or perhaps a link to an explanation. Not understanding having more insight into how the adjustments are calculated makes me wonder about their credibility.
- The Vader/Anakin analogy is, in fact, horrendous
- I read it, and read it again, and I still don’t know what S&P+ is. Thinking of S&P+ as an OPS for football might be really helpful if I knew what OPS is. Once again, links to background info would help enormously.

Bottom line is that some of the headier terms/concepts need some more contextual information for the article to be truly accessible for me.

Overall writing was fine (and I write and edit for living).

by dumeril7 on Feb 7, 2011 5:09 PM CST reply actions  

was just about to say the same thing about having a link to a more thorough explanation of some of the stats used (how they were calclated, what they mean, a comparison with some top performers and bottom feeders in those categories to guage where your team stands)

by UTLawGrad on Feb 7, 2011 5:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with that...equations and math.

I’ve read Bill’s work before, but I found myself having to reference back and not having a fluid understanding.

I did read it all and enjoyed it for what it is.

FYI this was the second worst year for TO TDs by Texas. In Mack’s first year they had zero, in 2010 only two. In 2010 they had 11, the high for Mack’s Texas team, and something which disguised the sense of strength of that team. The average over the period is six TDs directly via turnovers.

by whills on Feb 7, 2011 8:42 PM CST up reply actions  

also

I think the true value in the article is its analysis of last season…

Predictions based predominantly on our current roster is just as suspect as it was last year when we were a preseason top 5.

Now, in the specific case of TX, FLA or any program that has new offensive and defensive coordinators, there may be some value in analyzing the previous tendencies of those coaches and how that might translate to the new teams…

by UTLawGrad on Feb 7, 2011 5:26 PM CST reply actions  

I've tried as hard as I can to come up with a way...

…to incorporate individual coach data into the projections in one way or another, but it’s just impossible. All I can do with the ridiculous number of newcomers on the Texas staff is give the disclaimer I gave in the post — on average, here’s where a team like Texas would finish, but who the hell knows…

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Bill, what I would like to see after next season

is your analysis of Texas, Florida and Michigan, all relatively in the same situation going into the 2011 season. That could have a couple of levels of abstraction, from relative change with those individual teams from year-to-year plus the change relative to the other two. Might be better even over a two or three year span.

by whills on Feb 7, 2011 8:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Constructive Criticism

1. Yes, I read the whole thing.
2. After doing so, I have to quote Princess Bride: “Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.” Bill C.:
 “Wait till I get going!”
3. You obviously have a well thought out statistical methodology that not only helps you explain what you see on the field, but also has predictive ability.
4. That being said, your categories are confusing as hell. I suggest giving them more accessible names (something that’s an actual word or phrase, not an acronym). You explain your model, but it’s hard to keep a formula in your head and PPP + Rk doesn’t do anything to clue me in to what you’re talking about.
5. Your analysis is excellent, well thought out, well defended, and extremely thorough. You are obviously a very bright guy, but you need to work on methods to clearly communicate your analysis to your audience.

"Stats are for losers, I like winning games"
". . .switzer is a cracked out bitch . . ."-osu poster

by 98horn on Feb 7, 2011 5:31 PM CST reply actions  

The names are what they are at this point...

…but finding the balance between “explain the measures once and move on” and “hammer home the point too much” is difficult. I try to reference the word “explosiveness” anytime I mention PPP, but I’ll certainly try to do a better job of it.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't want to give the wrong impression

I enjoyed your article, and it confirms my gut: Colt was a supernatural accuracy freak camouflaging an offense that sucked. You asked for feedback, so I gave feedback. I wouldn’t have picked at nits otherwise.

"Stats are for losers, I like winning games"
". . .switzer is a cracked out bitch . . ."-osu poster

by 98horn on Feb 7, 2011 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Fumbles...

Indeed, it was darn right scary how many fumbles didn’t break our way last yr…

the one in particular that comes in mind is at the end of the OU game where the ball is literally bouncing around in the backfield for 5 minutes until we offer course booted the ball out of bounds.

Pretty sums up our season in a nutshell.

by jtdiddy on Feb 7, 2011 5:34 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

yeah, that's one part where I don't quite buy the thesis...

… that fumbles going your way are a 50/50 crap shoot. Sure, the ball shape makes bounces unpredictable. But I believe that old fashion hustle tilts things in one’s favor a little, so you’re more likely to come up with the fumbles that bounce in a way that doesn’t favor one player over another. I think the attitude malaise of our team also contributed to that 30% fumble recovery rate. Of course, you can’t quantify that so its completely speculative…

by dumeril7 on Feb 7, 2011 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Over time...

…every team averages out to about 50%, so if you’re on one extreme or the other, you’re likely coming back to the norm pretty soon. Like I said above, it’s no guarantee (see Florida 2008-09), but from year to year things tend to move back toward 50%.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll go with the hustle to some degree.

2005 is the golden number: 35 fumbles, lost 9. Hustle and a little luck.

by whills on Feb 7, 2011 9:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok, here's my thoughts.

Did you read the whole thing? Yes.

Did you understand it all? No.

Was it accessible? Not sure what this question means. I read it all, yes, so it was “accessible,” obviously. But I didn’t get the “Adj Score” and “PPP” stuff, as it was not “spoon-fed” to me. This is a sports story (right?) so I don’t want to learn “sports physics” unless it’s spoon-fed to me. I don’t want to search out the analysis and concentrate on it. Just me. For example, when I read Phil Steele, I understand what he’s saying and his analysis immediately. I don’t feel that way with this piece.

What did you like and dislike about it? Hey, it’s about the ‘Horns so I like that. But’s there a lot I disliked (sorry).

I thought the piece was awfully “familiar” in tone — “dude-ish”, actually. There seems to be a real need to come up with clever comparisons and metaphors. Lots of frosting and not enough cake. Too much “Vader”, “Sam Cooke”, “Emmeanual” stuff. Reminds me of Barking Carnival. Some like that stuff, though.

I also disliked your “wishy-washy” conclusion. Seems like you want to cover your butt if Texas does well or if Texas does badly. I believe you should say what you think . . . and just let go. For example, I think Texas wins at least 10 next year. I think we’re back. I think our OL matures and gets us back in the game. You may disagree with my assessment, you may think I’m a blathering idiot, but you certainly don’t have guess about what my assessment is.

I thought there was way too much focus on Colt McCoy and teams prior to last year’s squad. I just don’t buy what comes across to me as your conclusion that “really” Texas sucked (or creeping towards suckage) in 2009 and maybe even 2008, except that Colt and the WRs “covered it up.” That’s a popular theory right now, but I think it’s too attenuated (which is just a fancy way of saying, BS). Hey, we played in the NC, and were in the midst of incredibly long winning streaks. Focus on last year and years hence, IMO, not ancient history. Ancient history’s not necessary.

Some good stuff, though, like understanding Texas’ atrocious turnover ratio. Like recognizing that NU psyched themselves out (even if their dropped balls were the actual reason for NU’s loss). The passing downs information was interesting, too.

What’s missing? What most guys in the sports writing business miss is simple arithmetic. One of the best ways to predict a teams future success is simply to add up the number of years of experience the team’s OL line brings in. For example, if you’ve got over 20 years experience, look for a great offense. I rarely see this very simple predictor much discussed for some reason. The last famous example was the guy 2 two ago in the preseason who predicted all the OU losses. Last year, Texas’ OL experience was not good, and neither was the season.

What can be cut? The business about Colt McCoy is just stale pudding. We’re talking about 2011 here. Plus, I personally think it’s faulty analysis.

Does the style and presentation work? First, tell me who are you writing for. If you’re writing for a football blog, and that’s it, then your style is just fine. Barking Carnival loves that clever metaphor stuff, “See how smart and how cute I am.” But if you’re practicing for a gig that pays money, get more formal and less cute.

If you encountered this on a website like sbnation.com would you have read it? Yes.

And been pleased with it? I mean, it’s fine for what it is (or for what I think it is). We are told you worked very hard on this piece, and my reading seems to substantiate that claim of hard work. I do not consider it to be a “professional” piece, however, for the reasons set forth above. But it is fine as a blog piece.

by XoverX on Feb 7, 2011 7:13 PM CST reply actions  

Noticed you haven't chimed in tall hat much lately

but I like your style. Very honest, thoughtful, and forthright. We could stand to use more of that around here so don’t be a stranger. I’m sure Bill C. appreciates the candid feedback. It sure made me stop and think more critically of the piece.

- follow me @ http:/twitter.com/TXStampede

by TXStampede on Feb 7, 2011 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

shucks, *all that much...

- follow me @ http:/twitter.com/TXStampede

by TXStampede on Feb 7, 2011 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

This is a fun one...
But I didn’t get the "Adj Score" and "PPP" stuff, as it was not "spoon-fed" to me. This is a sports story (right?) so I don’t want to learn "sports physics" unless it’s spoon-fed to me.

I mentioned this above too, obviously, but the goal was to give you just enough information to understand what you’re reading without a deluge of links. Before this goes live for real, I’ll add some links, the primary one being this one: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/statistics/ncaa-sp-ratings-team/2010. Perhaps a link to the overall FO glossary (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/glossary) wouldn’t be a bad idea either.

I also disliked your "wishy-washy" conclusion. Seems like you want to cover your butt if Texas does well or if Texas does badly. I believe you should say what you think . . . and just let go. For example, I think Texas wins at least 10 next year. I think we’re back. I think our OL matures and gets us back in the game. You may disagree with my assessment, you may think I’m a blathering idiot, but you certainly don’t have guess about what my assessment is.

If I don’t truly believe one conclusion or another, I’m not going to pretend. There is an incredible amount of gray area involving Texas, and I said so. I’m not going to tell you they’re “back” or not back because I have no idea, and neither do “the numbers” (I like speaking about them as if they have feelings and a personality).

I thought there was way too much focus on Colt McCoy and teams prior to last year’s squad. I just don’t buy what comes across to me as your conclusion that "really" Texas sucked (or creeping towards suckage) in 2009 and maybe even 2008, except that Colt and the WRs "covered it up." That’s a popular theory right now, but I think it’s too attenuated (which is just a fancy way of saying, BS).

I stated my opinion and backed it up by explaining why. I didn’t know it was a “popular theory” because I try to draw my own conclusions. I backed up why I think so, and if you disagree, you’re free to do so.

Focus on last year and years hence, IMO, not ancient history. Ancient history’s not necessary.

Believe it or not, from a projections purpose, you can actually come up with better predictions basing them off of four years of data, not just last year. And since I can’t see into the future, I’m going to wring every bit of meaning out of the data I have.

First, tell me who are you writing for. If you’re writing for a football blog, and that’s it, then your style is just fine. Barking Carnival loves that clever metaphor stuff, "See how smart and how cute I am." But if you’re practicing for a gig that pays money, get more formal and less cute.

I feel icky doing this, but I know about formal, not-as-cute writing. (And no, I didn’t pitch for the Giants in the early 1950s.) Knowing that I was going to be throwing a bunch of new terms at people, and knowing that the audience for a bland wonkfest wasn’t high, I tried to keep things looser than I would in other writing. If it was a little too far down that road, that’s certainly something I need to know.

by Bill C. on Feb 7, 2011 8:14 PM CST up reply actions  

A 6-2 record and you quit?!

I thought wins were everything ;)

Greg Davis haikus; a lot like his offenses; always go sideways.

by pleaseplaykindle on Feb 7, 2011 8:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Loved it!

Was very readable. Overall, i don’t disagree with some of the comments about the S&P being hard to understand and the fact that it was a little cheesy at times.

The ‘cheese’ is what gave your stuff character. Without the cheese I might as well be reading something a hack put together in 20 minutes… but it WAS PROFESSIONAL. :) I’d read yours often.

There are other pieces on the net that I enjoy like “jones top ten” and other game recaps…. yours was superior simply because it was so easy to read. I would’ve thought for sure it would take me half an hour to read all that, but i finished in under 10.

92 out of 100

by Orangechipper on Feb 7, 2011 7:24 PM CST reply actions  

Good stuff, Bill C.

However, not sure how you can leave out the +/- for Gideon which I believe hovered at a -89, give or take.

GoBR loves to point out this stat when describing our defensive weakness up the middle. :-)

- follow me @ http:/twitter.com/TXStampede

by TXStampede on Feb 7, 2011 7:43 PM CST reply actions  

I liked it...

I measure this piece by:
1. Did i enjoy reading it? Yes.
2. Was it informative and have a couple new nuggets? Yes
3. Would I rank it in the top 20% of the serious blogs/articles I have read here or elsewhere on sports blogs? Yes.
4. Was it about the Longhorns.? Yes.
5. Would I recommend the read to others.? Heck YES.
6.. Was it perfect? Did I agree with everthing said? NO, but that is good, not bad.

Good job.

Hooking em to a Another National Championship.

by HookemZ06 on Feb 7, 2011 8:53 PM CST reply actions  

The biggest number of all

Loved the article, even if the topic headings were about as clear as a military debriefing following a lost battle.

The biggest question in my mind is whether Garrett Gilbert can ever reverse his horrific career TD to INT ratio that’s right about 1:2 at this moment. GG may have been ruined by the horrendous way he was utilized the last two seasons. By the end of last season, i.e., at the mid-point of his colleagiate career, he still lacked any touch on his short and intermediate passes and seemed to believe he could throw the ball through three and four-man coverage. Admittedly some of his best passes last season were dropped by our inept receiving corps. But I’ve yet to be convinced he can consistently hit receivers who are running toward the end zone, rather than standing still and facing him.

It’s hard to judge an offense as awful as last year’s Texas squad. Was it the coaching staff’s failure to teach basic skills and develop the talent of the players, the players’ lack of motivation, the timid scheme, or a combination of all those factors? I still have no clue. The only thing I am sure of is that, most of the time, it didn’t look like anyone in Burnt Orange was really trying to block anyone. Until we put players on the field who will at least try to block the opposing defense, everything else is secondary.

by Hornucopia on Feb 7, 2011 9:41 PM CST reply actions  

I've read a few of your articles before

and although I agree with the people above who’ve suggested links, I don’t really have to have an in-depth understanding of each statistic to understand the low rankings for the offensive output. Using that kind of statistical data is going to turn some people off immediately, because frankly we’re a spoon-fed society. If people have to think too much during the article, they’ll probably give up and move on because it’s not their cup of tea. I disagree with a few of your roster strength/weakness points, but those have already been addressed in the previous comments. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Keep it up.

by aaronlybrand on Feb 8, 2011 1:35 AM CST reply actions  

Outstanding

Yes, I read the whole thing and understood it except for a couple of the formulas and stats I am going to have to spend more time on. I like how you not only explain the stats but their implications (like yds/points; TO margin/ adj TO margin). The only two things that might be added were a discussion of penalties, especially crucial defensive penalties that kept drives alive and offensive penalties in the red zone, and some analysis of the colossal red zone failure of this team. As has been pointed out, some of the stats (like the by quarter stats) are skewed by the fact we got so far behind in some games that several teams went into “prevent mode” throughout the fourth quarter. Thus it looks like we played better in the fouth quarter when we didn’t.

"Only angry people win football games." --DKR

by OBdoc on Feb 8, 2011 10:35 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Burnt Orange Nation, a blog dedicated to University of Texas athletics. Get BON updates via Twitter.

Site Editors

Pb3_small Peter Bean

Dark_pumpkin_small awiggo

Sbnheadshot_small Wescott Eberts (GoBR)

Contributing Authors

Gse_multipart20834_small 40AS

Pigeons_small billyzane

Zombie_profilepic_small Horn Brain

220px-learnedhand_small learned hand

Jersey_front_small 54b

Small whills

Me_small burnt in ny

600px-lorenz_attractor_ybsvg_small pleaseplaykindle

Small TheElusiveShadow

Rosebowl_small txtwstr7

Silhouette_bull_crop_small TXStampede

Brandedbevo1024x768_small dimecoverage

Hookem_small Hopkins Horn

Pic_small Reggieball

Debonair_pic_small GoHornsGo90

Dkr_small InDKR'sShadow

Profile_pic_small billfromlaketravis

Peterson_small ElongatedHorn

Small Cat8

Harold_small HaroldHill

Michael_pelech_photo_small The Audit Horn