NCAA Tournament, Title Game: Why I'm Rooting for Connecticut
Tonight marks the end of another college basketball season as the Connecticut Huskies and the Butler Bulldogs hook up in Houston. Tip time is set for 8:23 pm on CBS. Now, many of you have moved on from the NCAA tournament after the Longhorns were bounced much too early. I can respect that and can certainly relate. Most of my basketball fandom was left in Tulsa too. However, there is only one more college basketball game till November, so you might as well take in the sights.
Last year's title game was pegged as David vs. Goliath, Butler vs. Duke. It is much harder to use that symbolism this year as David has returned to the title game for the second year in a row. No, this is just a match-up of two good basketball teams. One will cut down the nets and the other, like 66 other NCAA tournament teams, will end its season with a loss. Finality hurts.
For Longhorn fans, there are no obvious rooting interests in this one. It is easy to say, "root for Butler, the underdog, the little guy." I say no thanks. I'll be rooting for Connecticut. Before you jump up and down and point out that Jim Calhoun's program cheats and is built upon a healthy mix of Kelvin Samson's recruiting methods and Auburn football booster tactics, I agree.
After the jump, I explain why.
1. A Connecticut wins puts to rest these ludicrous "the Big East was overrated" commentaries. I don't think it should, but it will. I've been saying for weeks that tourney success neither proves nor invalidates season long resumes and perceptions of teams or conferences. You cannot say with any more accuracy that the No. 1 seeds were all overrated because none of them reached the Final Four, than you can say that Virginia Commonwealth definitely deserved to be in the tournament because they did reach Houston. Neither makes any sense. The committee slotted teams and awarded bids three weeks ago based on what each team had accomplished all season, not based on what they thought they could accomplish in the tournament. Using facts after a decision has been made to justify said decision makes zero sense to me.
Now, back to my original point, a Huskie national championship does nothing for me in terms of my feelings about the Big East. Coming into the tournament, the Big East was clearly the best and deepest conference in the country and it wasn't close. Win or lose tonight, the Big East will remain so, at least in my mind. But a Connecticut win will at least mute the counter argument.
2. Kemba Walker and Jeremy Lamb. All of you know about Walker, but my favorite player on the court tonight will be Lamb. Kemba has been great all season and should have been national player of the year. With Kemba, UConn is good and dangerous. With Kemba plus a solid supporting cast, UConn is about to be national champions. Connecticut is riding a ten game winning streak. Take a look at the last ten games by Lamb-all double figures in scoring, a ridiculously high field goal percentage, solid rebounding marks, and very few turnovers. It is more than a coincidence that as Lamb as matured, the Huskies have found their rhythm. All the announcer love tonight will be for Kemba, and rightfully so; however, it is Lamb who is the key to the game. Lamb takes the pressure off Kemba, stretches the defense with dagger-like three balls, and uses his length to frustrate smaller guards. Kemba is great now but Lamb is the better NBA prospect and future All-Star. Watch tonight, you'll see what I'm talking about.
3. The pain of the five second call is still real for me, and I'm sure for many of you. It is a very small consolation prize but it would be nice if one of the two Texas home losses this season came to the eventual national champion. The Longhorns had the Huskies beat in Austin in January until the Kemba show arrived in the second half and then again in overtime. If UConn wins, it gives me a little more hope that Texas will someday soon be national champion good.
4. A UConn wins validates everything I believe about the tournament. It takes a team with a great coach to cut down the nets. Check, this would be Calhoun's third title. It takes a team with the ability to score inside and out to win a national title. Check, with Walker and Lamb, the outside scoring threat is deadly. While, Connecticut doesn't have a great post player, the Huskies do excellent work on the offensive glass. It takes good guard play to win it all. Check plus. And it takes a solid combination of talented underclassmen paired with experienced junior and senior leadership. Check. Shabazz Napier, Roscoe Smith, and Lamb are all freshman, while Walker is a junior. Butler has a lot of these same elements but has fewer future pros and a less experienced coach. Maybe it wouldn't invalidate everything I "know" about the tournament but it wouldn't feel as "right."
Who are you rooting for and why?
58 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Who cares if the Big East is validated
Screw the Big Least. Funny how all the east coast commentators wet themselves about how many teams they got in the tourney (new record!) without mentioning how the conference keeps expanding. What are they now — 17 teams?
Yawn..
I think I will watch the Rangers and Mariners rather or maybe replay the Spring game GG interception…
Rooting for Butler but I agree with your point #4
UConn excels at recruiting stud big men and have had a number of quality to star guards enter their program. IMO the two most important positions to recruit in college basketball are point guard and center, and Barnes has unfortunately struggled to consistently recruit elite players at these positions on a consistent basis. Thankfully we have Kabongo coming in and Ridley the next year if he pans out.
And UConn winning wouldn’t make me feel any better about losing to them at home in overtime. They made two total fluke threes (one didn’t even beat the shot clock but there was no review for whatever reason), and we were totally annihilated on the glass. Just being able to win that game alone probably would’ve given us a boost in seeding.
by goingforthecorner on Apr 4, 2011 9:58 AM CDT reply actions
weak arguments
“Connecticut is riding a ten game winning streak”
Butler is riding a fourteen game winning streak.
“Check, this would be Calhoun’s third title.”
Check, Calhoun is a proven cheater who should be sitting out this tournament.
“It takes a team with a great coach to cut down the nets.”
And Stevens has not been “a great coach” these last two seasons?
“And it takes a solid combination of talented underclassmen paired with experienced junior and senior leadership.”
Somehow this is inferior to having more junior and senior experience?
Nothing at all against the Horns, but there must be some major-conference favoritism going on this guy’s head for any of these arguments to make sense.
Thanks for Joining
Yeah, point 4 is not as well worded as it should be.
The point I’m trying to make is the method that Texas would use to win a title is more UConn like than Butler like. Meaning, we are never going to have a team of all upperclassmen or a team with only one future pro.
Under Barnes, Texas will have young NBA worthy talent for their freshman and sophomore years, that is all. And we have to hope for the stars to align for that talent to come at the same time that we have a few, solid senior role players.
And yes, I do favor the major conferences, no question. If you root for a team in a major conference, I’d guess that is the overwhelming opinion.
--AW--
I favor the Big XII - I generally go against other major conference teams (particularly from the SEC/ACC/Big East).
Much rather have Butler win (more likeable coach, seem to be doing in ‘the right way’, won’t feed into the SEC-like hype the Big East got this year – 1 NC in a row!).
If you root for a team in a major conference, I’d guess that is the overwhelming opinion.
Are you saying that fans of Texas are much more likely to root for UConn over Butler tonight due to feeling some greater affinity towards a team in another major conference?
by Hopkins Horn on Apr 4, 2011 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
I’m saying that generally fans of teams from major conferences don’t care much for mid-major/non BCS schools.
See, the way we look down upon Boise State or TCU or Utahs of the world, for “not playing anyone.”
I could be wrong, just my sense.
--AW--
Oops, hit reply too early
My sense is that the pro-Butler sentiment amongst the readership would be at least 2-1.
by Hopkins Horn on Apr 4, 2011 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions
It's not about a single game
My sentiment is about general feeling of big boys vs. the little boys.
In a single game, there may be some affliation for Butler or TCU or whomever or general dislike for UConn in basketball or Ohio State in football. I get that.
My point is that overall, big boy fans root for big boy schools and conferences.
Again, I could be totally wrong. Feel free to poll the readers.
--AW--
I would agree with that sentiment
As a Texas alumn and fan I’m completely aware that Texas has a huge benefit because we’re a powerhouse school. As a school from a power conference and a traditional power, I want other schools in the same boat to take care of business and not get upset by the mid majors. The status quo has aided us, and I like it. It may not be totally logically sound, but when the big schools win, it tells me that things are normal and right with the world, and I like it.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
Both fantastic companies ;-)
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
see what you're saying but...
Both teams have a good shot at a title and it will likely be a close game that hinges on a certain degree of randomness. So, I don’t think one method is objectively better than the other. Therefore, I think whether UConn wins or loses has little to no bearing on how successful we can be with a similar MO. Therefore, I say root out of emotion. Ergo, vis a vi, screw that dirty Calhoun son of a bitch. Go Butler!
"The only sport that should be cried over is tee ball."
- don't remember who said it, but I like it.
by HookTech on Apr 4, 2011 12:09 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Definitely Butler
The thought of Dickie V’s et. al. Big East blathering makes my tummy hurt. That, and the fact that Butler is my (current, though temporary) hometown team makes me root for the Bulldogs.
Really, I don’t know that Texas needs UConn to win for some kind of validation. The consensus seems to be that Texas is a good team, and much better than last year. That same consensus seems to say that the Horns got screwed…both by the seeding committee and by the officiating. (Oh, and UT got screwed against UConn in Austin too. Kemba’s weird 3-point heave was late.)
Anyway, I’ll be at a local sports television viewing establishment this evening. And as the game starts locally at 9:23, please don’t post anything good too early tomorrow…
We're going to play like we're in a bad mood.
Butler.
Even though I agree about the ridiculousness of the “Big East is overrated” theme, I just hate UConn so much. Hopefully this is Butler’s year for redemption.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Can't Agree
We’ve talked about this before to some degree, but I’m with AW, only for different reasons though. I’m a traditionalist, and I like to see the traditional powers do well. As a fan I honestly hate these little mid majors crashing the party (and I realize now that Butler isn’t exactly a cinderella because of last year, but the point remains). Yes, it’s cute when the little guy makes a run, but by about the sweet sixteen or at least the elite eight I want them the hell out of there. I don’t follow these little schools all year, I know nothing about them, and because of a lack of history, I don’t find them interesting at all.
Call me the devil or the problem with college sports because I want the status quo of haves and have nots to stay the same if you will, but I’d much rather watch a UK/KU/UCLA/UNC (once Texas is out of course) Final Four, and I won’t apologize for it. I don’t care about the perception that UConn is running a sleezy program. They’re a power, they recruit well, they have an amazing coach, and they’re interesting -all like AW said. And, dammit, I’m hoping they knock “cinderella” back down to earth.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
You do know...
…that a Butler senior this year will have watched his or her school in the Final Four as many times as seniors at all schools in the Big 10, SEC, Big 12, Pac 10 and Big East combined?
But, yeah, they’re merely crashing the party.
by Hopkins Horn on Apr 4, 2011 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions
See: "I'm aware that Butler isn't exactly a cinderella"
I get that they’re legitimate, and I’m not saying they have no business being there -their track record over the last couple of years proves that. I would just rather watch the big boys more than I want to watch these mid major schools that I don’t watch all year.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
So why should they even be allowed to compete in the tournament, if ESPN doesn't bother showing them during the season?
by Hopkins Horn on Apr 4, 2011 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
You have an astounding ability of exaggeration and hyperbole
It’s impressive really ;-). I never said they shouldn’t be in there. I’m saying that I, personally (emphasis added), don’t care to watch them as much as I like watching the big boys. They’re fun and cute at first, but by the time we get to crunch time UCLA v. UNC excites me. Butler v. VCU does not.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
But UCLA and UNC aren't in the final four!
I guess you could watch them on your xBox tonight while the fun and cute team plays for it all. :)
by Hopkins Horn on Apr 4, 2011 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Only if you add the game to your library
And start playing more than that damn soccer game. ;-)
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
Why?
It’s good to be the king.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
See, I can't understand this at all
I think it’s so boring when the same old dynasty teams are playing for it. In any sport, really, but especially in college basketball. If I don’t have a rooting interest in a Duke or a UK, then I’d much rather see a “little” program who can overcome and beat them. Far, far more interesting to me. I’m guessing you also were rooting for Rudy, the 1980 Olympic hockey team, and Rocky to be knocked back down to earth and cheered when the English executed William Wallace.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Wallace
Shouldn’t have said he wasn’t a subject of King Edward. Just saying.
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
King Edward
Shouldn’t have treated Scotland like his own personal amusement park.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
They. Make. Scotch.
What else was he supposed to do with it?
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
Sample it in an orderly fashion at the Scotch Whisky Heritage Center
Like the rest of us.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Also, I'm sad.
I get up for 15 minutes to go give my fiance the car keys and I come back and I’ve missed this cute little exchange.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Still here! *waves*
"Poetic talent is really easy to fake when thy sentences doth no f***ing sense make." -Bo Burnham
You can respond to my thrown gauntlet above.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
This may be blasphemy,
but I’m rooting for UConn tonight and it’s largely because I’m a fan of Kemba Walker.
Sue me.
I wish I could play little league now... I'd kick some fuckin' ass.
Considering Texas was a 4 seed,
you lost me at:
“The committee slotted teams and awarded bids three weeks ago based on what each team had accomplished all season, not based on what they thought they could accomplish in the tournament.”
"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?" - Vince Lombardi
My comment on this quote:
I’ve been saying for weeks that tourney success neither proves nor invalidates season long resumes and perceptions of teams or conferences. You cannot say with any more accuracy that the No. 1 seeds were all overrated because none of them reached the Final Four, than you can say that Virginia Commonwealth definitely deserved to be in the tournament because they did reach Houston. Neither makes any sense.
This is why I maintain that the NCAA tournament winner is not actually a national champion—and really, just as much a MNC as the BCS winner is.
When the world slips you a jeffrey, stroke the furry wall.
by burntorangehorn on Apr 4, 2011 11:48 AM CDT reply actions
totally agree
March Madness and the World Cup are the greatest sporting events to watch because in any one game the outcome is fairly random and the implications are monumental. It really is win or go home as opposed to NCAA/MLB baseball, NBA, NHL etc where you need to beat a team 2-4 times to advance.
The voted and BCS national champions usually agree but I’d be interested to see what would happen with a post tourney vote in basketball (Do they do that?). Would anyone have VCU in their top 4? Top 10? Top 25? What about Butler? Do they rank above Pitt now? Where does tOSU rank now? If you voted based on a “which team do I think is better” basis then I don’t think you could change your rankings too much after a single elimination tournament. If people can’t agree who the top teams are after a full regular season how can March Madness claim they do it in 3 weeks.
I could be somewhat persuaded by this.
Basketball is really a three-part system: regular season, conference tournament, national tournament. However, this is also true of 30 other NCAA sports, which at the least have conference competition, regional tournaments and the final national tourney (baseball). Track has conference meets and national qualifying times, with a couple of independent Last Time meets to make the qualifying limit. They’re all much the same form. Lower division football teams generally have 32 team playoffs.
So, champions have to have the endurance to make it through it all. So, overall I do think they are the national champion in that respect…they’ve played – and won – over all the competition presented to them. Endurance has always been an essential element in sports.
I do think the conference tournaments are overkill and totally unnecessary at this point.
How In The World Can Anyone Root for a Convicted Cheat and Scumbag?
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
Butler...but will spend most of the evening watching the Rangers continue their winning ways (so awesome to type that)
Other question…what is the date to declare for the draft and when can they pull out if no agent?
I totally agree with your lamb and walker point
Lamb looks like he will be something special. All the pro scouts have been drooling over him with his combination of heigh, length for a 2 guard. He kind of has that wiry frame that kobe had coming out of highschool, although i wouldn’t say he will end up being as good as kobe. He just reminds me of him. Also I love kemba. The combination of his sweet crossover, and the huge heart and toughness he plays with. He plays the game the way it is meant to be played. He has probably been my favourite player to watch since durant and before that melo.
As for the big east- i’m leaning on agreeing with you. People can really only make the argument that nova and maybe marquette did not deserve to be there. All the others had solid resumes. It’s not the big east schools fault that every sports writer and media outlet keep selling this conference as the be all end all of college basketball.
Not feeling it, AW.
I usually do agree with most of your perspectives and arguments, but none of your reasons do it for me personally. Fortunately, we’re talking about who we are rooting for and not something more objective that houses a deep, stingy, personal pain.
Butler for me, and it is not even close. Not so much for the underdog story that it isn’t, or even for redemption from last year. In closely watching these two teams for the last couple months, I simply respect the Butler program too much not to root for them. Yes, it’s Brad Stevens; yes, it’s the small Indy school of < 5k students; it’s Matt Howard, a stand-up guy; it’s the very lack of gleaming future pros you mentioned that also has me pulling for them more. When my dog isn’t in the hunt, I look to the intangibles, the story lines, team cohesion, leadership, etc. Without letting an ESPN All Access special tug at your heart strings, Butler winning is what this tournament is about for me. I have no personal beef with UConn, but absolutely nothing compels me to root for them over the Bulldogs.
by Infield Elephant on Apr 4, 2011 2:31 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
If affinity is a criteria to decide who you are rooting for then ...
I bet Jim Tressel is rooting for UConn tonight.
Hook 'em
what she said.
"Football's so important in Texas. On the West Coast, it's a social. On the East Coast, it's a culture. Here, it's a religion."
-- Major Applewhite
A Butler win is easier to embrace and carries more of the old "thrill of victory."
Arguments about whose conference is the “best” are a waste of time. It’s about each team and its journey. Using your logic, I would have to pull for SEC teams in big fb games – not gonna happen. I have to pull for a school that takes a chance on a guy who took a chance and left a corporate job to do what his heart (and his fiancé) told him he should do before it was too late. I have to pull for a team whose players have paid the price and stayed their whole four years - and not just because that was their only option. And come on, it’s still David vs Goliath until a small school actually wins it all.
Just wondering, AW, were you pulling for the big city team in the movie “Hoosiers?” Interesting footnote that the final game in that movie was filmed in Butler University’s Hinkle Fieldhouse.
Other intangibles: UConn is further north (always a consideration for me).
What time is it?
Go Butler!
I think Kemba Walker should win POY this year. But I do not want to see UConn win tonight. It doesn’t validate anything for me if they do. I’ll be sad – just like last year. I think the Big East is still overrated – no matter how many teams they send to the tournament every year.
I will be pulling for Butler (as I always do). I’d like to see the smaller school win. Who doesn’t love a Cinderella story? I’m with Pat Forde on this one.
My thoughts
you’re one of my favorite authors here awiggo, but I have to respectfully disagree with your opinions:
1. A Connecticut wins puts to rest these ludicrous “the Big East was overrated” commentaries.
Both sides of the argument have their merits. But wouldn’t it be more satisfying to shut up the pundits like Vitale, with his perrenial favorites? I agree with Bilas… may the most deserving team, based on their play tonight, win.
Furtheremore, as a Big XII member, we’d rather dispel the “Big East is the best” argument, for recruiting purposes, if not other reasons.
2. Kemba Walker and Jeremy Lamb.
They are impressive, but both will also get to enjoy lucrative careers in the NBA as top draft picks. The same can’t be said for certainty for Butler’s Mack and Howard. These guys have worked hard and carried their non-4-star team for two seasons. Howard has even gone beyond the BB call of duty by double majoring in Finance and MIS (s.t. to do with computers).
3. Texas loss to UConn
Firstly, we don’t need the sentiment boost, and secondly, NO ONE outside of a few in Texas will remember or care in a year. What’s more important is history being made today for the recordbooks. I want a Butler Cinderella story to come true.
4. A UConn wins validates everything I believe about the tournament.
Sort of, but the validation isn’t really necessary right now. Most years, a 1 or 2 seed wins the tourney.
Biggest point for me: Brad Stevens. You gotta love his class, genius, humility, and selflessness. He has committed to staying loyal to Butler even though he could jump to a bigger program and make much more $$$ elsewhere.

by 































