DeLoss Dodds: Continuing Texas-Texas A&M Rivalry "Problematic"
In a meeting with a select group of reporters on Wednesday, Texas athletic director DeLoss Dodds held forth on a variety of topics only hours after the Big 12 managed to avoid dissolution for the second year in a row, including the Longhorn Network, revenue sharing in a league held together by duct tape and elbow grease, and the possible continuation of the historic Texas-Texas A&M rivalry.
Of greatest concern to most Texas fans is whether or not the Longhorns will continue to play the Aggies on Thanksgiving if/when A&M makes the move to the SEC conference. Though the league will likely make last-ditch efforts to keep A&M in the Big 12, Dodds sounded resigned to the possibility of losing the Aggies:
In my mind, they’re in the SEC (already). People feel OK with that. A lot of people wish they were still here, but they’ve moved on.
The comment grabbing the most headlines around the country concerned the continuation of the rivalry:
I think it will be hard to schedule that game.
When news of the Aggies potentially leaving the conference first broke, there were rumors of the SEC allowing A&M to keep that Thanksgiving date open to continue playing Texas. In the end, this is more about Dodds making it extremely clear to the Aggies that if A&M wants to get away from Texas so badly, there will likely be consequences. Threatening the existence of a league that, despite some considerable problems, still makes the most sense for each member institution doesn't come without costs and it looks like at least the short-term existence of the rivalry is in jeopardy as a result. This is the consequence of pledging solidarity and then trying to leave a year later.
Dodds also pointed out that the athletic directors approved equal revenue sharing for the conference's Tier 1 and Tier 2 rights last spring, but the presidents never took action. Expect that to happen soon. Regarding the Longhorn Network, Dodds still sounded willing to make some compromises, which may have to include promises not to televise high school games or highlights.
The best comment of the day from Dodds could rival his famous "We are the Joneses" brilliance:
We are who we are. People say what they say. The outcome is the outcome. We're proud of ourselves.
Haters gonna hate, but excuse us, we have to get back to counting our money.
365 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can't have your cake and eat it too, Ags
You either escape Texas’ shadow or use that shadow for a national exposure game, can’t do both.
by CMDR on Sep 21, 2011 2:01 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Can’t have your cake and eat it too
I’ve never understood this analogy. What’s the point of getting cake and not eating it? Shouldn’t it be more like “can’t have your cake and ice cream too.”
Do not be distracted by what you see, but be transformed by what you believe.
The correct, but rarely used version is
“You can’t eat your cake and have it too.”
So…now does it make more sense? As my signature line suggests, I am often trying to decide whether I want that cake…
Indecision may or may not be my problem.
yeah,
I always thought the better analogy would be “you can’t have your money and spend it too.”
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 22, 2011 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions
The idea is about the duality of both having a cake to eat, and the joy of eating said cake.
The cake looks great, it has been prepared and decorated with the finest appointments. You enjoy having it around. By being present, the cake lets all people know both that you are fancy, and that fun times are going to ensue at some point not too far down the line.
At the same time though, that cake is freakin delicious, and you really want to eat it. But once you stick your face in it or even just cut out a piece, the appearance is broken and ruined. So you can’t have it both ways man. Either appreciate the craftsmanship, or eat the dang cake.
I disagree.
We can eat our cake and have theirs too.
So Good It Must Be Repeated
…if A&M wants to get away from Texas so badly, there will likely be consequences. Threatening the existence of a league that, despite some considerable problems, still makes the most sense for each member institution doesn’t come without costs and it looks like at least the short-term existence of the rivalry is in jeopardy as a result. This is the consequence of pledging solidarity and then trying to leave a year later.
Are you listening, Sooners?
Not all of us.
I’d rather keep BOTH rivalries but, if I had to choose, I’d take the Turkey Day game w/ little brother.
As evidenced from many other comments here & where I live, I'm definitely not alone in that.
But I’ll at least admit that I’m in the vast minority here at BON.
welcome to the minority
always good to see another minority member
Who are you?!
I'm Kick Ass!
by TexasGarcia37 on Sep 21, 2011 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't prefer A&M
but I seem to be one of the few who views both rivalries as equals.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 22, 2011 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Totally agree.
Both rivalries are SO very different in character, flavor, and competitiveness of the actual game. State Fair corny dogs vs. Turkey Day. Evil wicked satans vs. cultish sheep stalkers. Arch-enemy criminals vs. family member jawing. Bitter hate vs. mosquito-ish annoyance. Traitor Texas kids playing out of state vs. home-state lovin’ kids. Texas may or may not end up in a different conference & different schedule but the last thing I want them to do is degrade on the quality level of each independent game. Getting rid of the aggy game would be a huge loss – IMO.
Why would you want the meaningless game?
It’s little more than a lose lose for Texas. A&M is rarely up so if UT loses, there goes the season, but if UT wins, they’re pathetic so it doesn’t gain us anything anyway.
TEXAS FIGHT
well...
I’d rather have the one that is typically higher up in the rankings…
hmm
not playing Texas would be devastating for OU. Not sure if that is also true for A&M at this point.
by honkskillet on Sep 21, 2011 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions
amuT's whole existence is dependent on their infatuation w/ all things UT.
They would be devastated and lose all reason for living.
I don't want that game
If they’re going to wreck the conference, they’re dead to me as far as playing them.
TEXAS FIGHT
I think this is what Dodds is saying.
Follow me on Twitter: @GhostofBigRoy
Burnt Orange Nation
by Wescott Eberts (GoBR) on Sep 22, 2011 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions
He's a very astute man.
I love it that he’s taking that stance w/ aggy. Texas is the alpha-dog here … & he’s letting ’em know it.
Anyone can have a Thanksgiving game
But no one else can have a game in the middle of the Texas State Fair against a consistently quality opponent.
by UPB13 on Sep 21, 2011 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
We got another Joe Parker on our hands.
Do not be distracted by what you see, but be transformed by what you believe.
We've also got another copycat rob.
He may be white … but I’m the FWMA (Fastest White Man Alive).
Looks like you joined BON 1.5 years after me
so I assume you are referring to yourself as the copycat?
I'm not sober.
No offense. There's plenty of room for everyone.
I’ve been around for awhile now and have never seen you post. Maybe we can double the impact of ‘rob’ now. It won’t be near as much as Joe Parker’s aura but at least we can dream.
It was supposed to be a parody of the message typically shown at the end of political ads
I guess I should’ve waited a few months on that attempt.
Believe me: Ihave no interest in keeping the idiotic joe parker meme alive.
I'm not sober.
My Understanding IsThat
Dodds made these statements while simultaneously performing shoulder surgery on Garret Gilbert.
Joe Parker
and trying to respond to the spam texts he keeps getting from Greg Davis about if Deloss misses him yet?
Joe "Effing" Parker
And Go MIZZOU
Not meaning go to the $EC, but meaning, GO, Beat the Hell outta OU!!
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
As much fun as it is to watch OU and aggie lose on national television...
…I’d rather them both be undefeated when/if we beat them.
To err is human...but humans have such low standards.
Missouri will NEVER beat Oklahoma
they save their worst game for the Sooners every year; you can set your watch to it.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 22, 2011 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions
I went to UT. My dad went to OU.
That game is THE game in our home. the a/m game? who cares?
3rd Degree Longhorn
by Ohio Horn on Sep 21, 2011 2:09 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I went to UT, my younger sister went to UT,
And my youngest Sister went to A&M. It is a really important game in our family.
My older sister and older brother went to Purdue. It is kind of like A&M. I am so sick of the aggies I am happy to trade out and play Purdue….which means there are a lot of other schools I wouldn’t mind playing on Thanksgiving as well.
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
by Wrangler86 on Sep 21, 2011 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
One side of my family is Aggie. Meh.
Get rid of the game. I won’t miss it.
SEC- Southern Evangelical Cheaters. Since Jesus didn't specifically mention cheating in football in the New Testament, they are good to go.
by dimecoverage on Sep 21, 2011 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Ditto
Mom’s side is all Aggies, my uncle has been involved in the athletic dept. since Bear Bryant took the4 boys to Junction.
Joe Parker
I have family that did not even go there but are as diehard aggy fan as it gets… how does that happen? “Stupid is as stupid does” I guess…
Joe "Effing" Parker
Joe Parker
Would know the answer. Where the hell is that guy when you need him?
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
Joe F Parker

http://50.rainsvillealabama.com/gallery_parkers.htm
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
Joseph F. Parker

http://www.usshancockcv19.com/protestant_devotions.htm
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
I was wondering how long it would take someone to do that.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
She kinda aged into it.
She had no horseface in LA Story. A very pretty gal, nonetheless.
we're related
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 22, 2011 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Parker Stevenson

"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
Parker? I don't even know 'er!!
We're going to play like we're in a bad mood.
by JoeT63 on Sep 21, 2011 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
but wait i thought the aggies didnt have/like "t-shirt" fans
formerly "Horns102591"
by horns1025 on Sep 21, 2011 6:04 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Most of my lineage went to UT. I have an uncle that went to Tech...
Could care less whether we play aggie or not.
Manny Diaz will take your lunch...and eat it too...
My great-grandfather went to Southwestern
But I went to Texas and I don’t care if we play this game either.
by scdavis50 on Sep 21, 2011 4:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
I like this game. Lemme try...
I went to Cal Poly and Texas. Wife went to UCLA twice. Parents went to Seattle U. Brother and sister went to Santa Clara. Other brother went… ah, fuck it.
I'm not sober.
Folks from Purdue are smart enough to go to IU on weekends for fun,
not sure Aggies are that smart.
At least Aggies are usually welcoming in person when you go to a game there
Being an opposing fan at Purdue was possibly the worst opposing fan experience I’ve ever had. Horrible fans.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Maybe they're just horrible to Notre Dame fans then
But I’ve never gotten so much mean-spirited, threatening harassment as I did that night. And I wasn’t even at the game. I walked my fiance and his best friend to Ross-Ade and then walked back to meet my friend at a bar to watch it (she couldn’t go to the game because she didn’t get off work till after kickoff), and I actually felt extremely unsafe on that walk. Maybe it was because I was a young and not-hideous woman walking alone in an ND jersey and so I was an easy target, but that explanation makes it worse behavior, not better.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
The Aggies really hate us
but they are generally welcoming to our fans when we go there to play. I was there in 2005 and they were nothing but friendly and respectful to me, with some mild ribbing. Hatred doesn’t excuse assholishness.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Certainly not - I'm guessing I don't know the ones that were mean to you and I certainly don't know their motives or want to defend them in any way.
I’ve known many a friend that had their cars keyed in College Station on T+1 over the years. I think all fan bases have crazies that take it too far against certain rivals.
Oh yeah, that definitely happens, along with UT decals being ripped off, etc.
I just mean at Kyle individual fans seem to generally be friendly to the faces of individual fans.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Maybe so
Every fanbase has its bad apples. The overall atmosphere at Kyle was friendly in my experience, while the atmosphere I experienced in West Lafayette was hostile and threatening.
But Internet Aggies are a different story, as are the fine specimens of humanity in the Corps.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
2005 was the year that the corp threw shovels of manure on to our band
In my experience (I was there in 2005) it was more than just few bad apples. A middle-aged guy a couple rows in front of me grabbed a UT student and twisted her arm around her back because she put her horns up during the kickoff, while a lady sitting next to him told her she was trash and didn’t deserve to her seats that everyone around them had made significant contributions for. Stadium security showed up and did nothing.
That's horrible
I was in the student section (date) and they were all really nice to me.
And I knew that about the corps guy, which is why I threw in the caveat about the corps. They’re invariably horrible.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I will say
I’ve been to tailgates and games there at other times NOT wearing UT stuff and everyone was very nice. But have run into similar scenes at all 3 of the UT games I’ve been to there.
UT vs. aTm had it's luster back in the day
Growing up in Austin during the 60s and 70s, it was a much bigger deal than it is today. UT vs. OU, not so much back then.
I think it has more to do with the where the programs are.
Since 2000 almost every RRR has had at least one team ranked in the top ten if not both. If that was the same for Turkey Day the frenzy would be the same.
Do not be distracted by what you see, but be transformed by what you believe.
depends on 'back in the day'...
I was in school in the mid-70s, and although aTm was arguably the better team through that period, the game was an afterthought next to OU. OU was the number one rival and it was unquestionable.
After that, the aggies fell in the mix with Arkansas.
Basically, losing the game is largely inconsequential. If you could replace that Thanksgiving spot with someone like Notre Dame, it would be a huge upgrade in terms of interest. And if Kelly gets them back past mediocrity, it’s an exponential upgrade.
Happiest Man In America Today?
I’d say it’s David Ubben.
by DudeAbide on Sep 21, 2011 2:10 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
He leads the nation in interceptions thrown with six.
Whio is Brandon Weeden, Alex?
We are who we are. People say what they say. The outcome is the outcome. We’re proud of ourselves.
I do wish we’d be paying a bit more attention to the PR wars in all of this.
Says you with that poor crying sooner boy
Did you get banned at CCM yet? If not—get back to work!!
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
Heh . . the avatra was especially chosen for the CCM whiners who already hate, and now fear, us
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
They really took one to the gut
And they really don’t like that.
It is one thing for aggies to be put in their place behind Texas, but it is a whole other thing when OU is told to stand at the end of the line.
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
Meh
Aggy Chancelor John Sharp said the following "We are going to the Southeastern Conference to play with the big boys." Will that lead to negative PR? Of course not. Haters gonna hate regardless of what Texas does.
http://www.twitter.com/orlansky_40as
http://www.twitter.com/JayMashBON
so they are gonna start buying players?
formerly "Horns102591"
by horns1025 on Sep 21, 2011 6:10 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
blA&Me
With the news that Pac 12 isn’t rushing to be a superconference, and the Big 10 didn’t quake at the shouts of a nuclear arms race, I’m really wondering if the $EC wants to go through with the ags.
Ags all alone bring them Texas media markets, but if it is just the Ags leaving and that move doesn’t cause the Big XII-II-I to fracture the Big XII can demand their early exit money from Aggies and we know that they don’t have it. Unless $EC is willing to take A&M without waivers (and pray to God the Big XII-ii-i stays together for 4-5 years) so it is long enough to not be sued, then I don’t see $EC wanting to go forward.
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
Then Beebe needs to kick them out of the conference, they need to go.
SEC- Southern Evangelical Cheaters. Since Jesus didn't specifically mention cheating in football in the New Testament, they are good to go.
by dimecoverage on Sep 21, 2011 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Mizzou isn't going near SEC now
Cuz that would creat a whole new problem and they may be liable, so they’d be wise to shut that stuff down and fast.
So, that leaves poor little aggies with the big giant $EC all alone. Little brother done made a big boo boo in all of this.
That would be the ultimate, that aggie comes back again, and like the LHN, Dodds has to tell them NO.
A&M: Ready,Set, Go.....
You should change your signature line, Wrangler
to "A&M: Go, Ready, Set….
We're going to play like we're in a bad mood.
UT vs A&M
This is the best news I’ve heard in awhile. I just hope this includes all sports and not just football. I have no idea what they will do whenever we go to Kyle and win this year. Thanksgiving is a long ways away for this young team.
Sorry, but I f*cking hate this guy.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Yup.
This is the second time he kept us from the Pac-12, only this time he screwed up the entire college football landscape in the process. We should be outraged at him, but strangely most are not.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Why?
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Are you even half aware of how much Deloss has done for UT?
If you’re a UT fan, you really have to check yourself and get out of the “what have you done for me lately” mentality.
TEXAS FIGHT
I'm tired of that argument.
1. It presupposes that out of the gigantic talent pool in this country, no one could have done similarly well and..
2. That past success trumps current mistakes.
Both are false. Don’t tell me what I have to do if I’m a UT fan.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
There would have been a pod system.
We would have playing every other team every other year. I don’t think it’s that extreme to prefer the Pac-16 over… over what? What do we have now? A horrible, barely-AQ conference.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
You keep repeating the barely-AQ conf. bit, but it doesn't make it true
Top ranked team in the country. 4 teams currently in the top 20, 2 in the top 10. 5 and 3 if you include A&M.
2 teams playing in 6 of the last 10-11 national championship games.
In 2008, Texas faced 4 top 10 conference teams in a row, and not one of them was named Nebraska or A&M.
But do you really think
Baylor is going to ever be as strong as it is right now? They’ll lose a game soon and will drop out of the top 25 in a matter of weeks.
We only have 9 programs. Freaking 9. I’m not convinced BYU will join our conference. Or WVU. Other than them there’s no one worth adding.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Does Texas Tech have great academics?
I’m also told the “WVU has bad academics” meme is actually somewhat baseless.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Comparing additional schools to the worst current schools is not particularly helpful.
Should the SEC compare all additions to Mississippi State? The SEC would never invite Mississippi State if they weren’t already members.
And I think BYU will be added, but I am not sure if we’ll want WVU – and the SEC might have to take them if they want to get to 14.
I think we should add WVU
if they make promises to better their academic standing.
And, again, I’ve been told the "WVU has bad academics" meme is actually somewhat baseless.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Should we add WVU if they make us promise to stay in the Big XII for 10 years?
I thought you think that its indisputable that we should go to the Pac 16?
This time it would have been a pod system - because that was on of Texas' demands.
If we had moved last year, it wouldn’t have been a pod system.
I'm okay with it either way.
I think the Pac-16 East would have been just as strong as a 9 team Big 12.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I want to lose the LHN.
It greatly limits our options and causes strife.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Not really an opinion, though.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
We don't know how much it limits our options, because we got exactly what we were looking for (the Big XII).
While it makes some avenues harder
it also is a good thing in that it makes an easy path to independence. More games on the LHN would make it more of a must have option for carriers and the deals would be reworked to cover more games a season.
TEXAS FIGHT
yes
I can tell from you posts that you posses an extreme aversion to causing or prolonging strife.
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
by UTLawGrad on Sep 21, 2011 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
No justice, no peace.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
wow
Yes, this monumental cause of yours requires you to co-opt a slogan, which your use of in such a casual manner demonstrates your lack of appreciation for it.
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
you want to lose the LHN???
because it limits our options????
if anything it expands our options exponentially. If it turns out to be a huge home run (which is every bit as likely as vaguely successful, and tons more likely than an outright bust), it will allow us to pretty much choose to do whatever we want to do. And in a very few years, who’s to say what that might entail? It might be far, far, far more desirable than being stuck in a Desert Division of a PAC conference whose big cachet right now is a presence in a huge market that actually cares very little for college football. Does anyone really know whether “super-conferences” will turn out to be even workable? Or whether the whole conference model will be reworked in an environment where the biggest schools will be the masters of their own networks? Nobody knows at this point what the cost structures of public universities will be like in even just a few years. And in this brave new world, having your own network in place and making money might be the golden ticket.
And say none of that happens, and it turns out to be a huge bust. Will our options be more constrained if we’re willing to give it up at that point? So what will we have lost?
I’ll give you that it “causes strife”, but frankly, dropping something worth a few hundred millions just to avoid strife seems, well, foolish is the very kindest word I can think of…
So now he is judged not just by what he has done
but what LookinForIt assumes someone else could have done. Ok.
Someone wants to borrow
Abe Lemmons’ glass-bottomed car.
I just him on how sound his decisions are.
And I just don’t care for greed.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I'm okay that he's greedy about getting Texas athletics in the best position to succeed.
In fact, I think that why we pay him.
Depends on your definition of success, I guess.
I think getting us into the Pac-16 would have been putting us in the best position to succeed.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
This is where I am as well
If the PAC is eventually going to expand, which I think it will, what other teams make sense?
Them adding 4 other members before then maybe?
It’s not unlikely.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
What's your real gripe?
Why should UT have to go to the PAC when it isn’t even the best option and Mizzou ‘n A&M can’t escape until they get waivers that they and the SEC won’t get sued. Yeah… that’s not going to happen.
In all likelihood, both of them are stuck in the the Big 12 for the season which should give them time to cool the hell off.
If you’re annoyed about the LHN, well join the club. I think it’s silly to care so highly for the network when it’s barely started anyway and is having issues getting carried.
But taking all that out, he’s helped put us in the position we’re in by making quality decisions throughout the UT athletic department.
TEXAS FIGHT
It is the best option.
A&M is gone. Many lawyers have said that Baylor (and others) don’t have a case.
I’m not saying I don’t value what he’s done in the past. I’m just saying he’s gone too far and he’s too ideological to swallow his pride and deliver us to a better, more stable conference.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
You don't understand
THEY DON’T NEED A CASE. All they have to say is “No, we won’t waive our right to sue” and the transfer is halted. Unless the SEC is willing to risk a huge loss by taking them, nothing ever has to reach a courtroom.
TEXAS FIGHT
I doubt the SEC is going to uphold this ridiculous stipulation.
They want A&M by 2012 or 2013. They’ll “risk” baseless litigation to add them sooner or later.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
the risk...
is a lot more urgent for the SEC than it is for you. If it turns out that the “baseless” litigation is successful (and recent history is littered with examples of much more baseless litigation working out just fine for the plaintiffs), they’ll lose actual money instead of internet legal expert rep.
Once real money is involved, and especially when it contains lots of zeros, the ‘risk/reward’ ratio gets a lot more real. Trust me, they’re going to be looking really hard at the ‘reward’ before they jump all over that ‘risk’.
Ah, another brainwashed tort reformist.
Is that redundant?
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 22, 2011 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions
So we should all be furious with Dodds
Because you think PAC is the best option, and he chose not to do it? That’s all you’ve got? Even if you were right, shouldn’t your anger be more directed at Powers and the BOR? Put another way, do you really think that both Powers and BOR were completely on board with moving to PAC and Dodds single-handedly killed it?
We should all be furious with Dodds
because we should all think the Pac-12 is the best option.
In short, yes, I think Powers was on board to move to the Pac-12, but I think Dodds had the BOR in his back pocket.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
That's a lot of baseless speculation about Dodds.
You’re free to your opinion about what the best conference is – but it seems silly to get so upset because others don’t agree (especially since there’s a reasonable chance we’ll end up in that conference eventually anyway).
There's good reason to believe that.
It’s hardly “baseless”.
It’s not silly to get upset because if more people agreed with me there would be more of a groundswell.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Sure - but I think more people would agree with you if you were likely to be right.
I don’t think you are.
People are often (maybe even usually) wrong.
Just look at election results.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Let's just stop.
That’s a whole other conversation.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Because if you have a different opinion than he does
You’re wrong. Everyone who voted for a different person than LookinForIt in the last election was wrong. His opinions aren’t opinions, they’re fact.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
If more people die as a result of the election of your guy.
Then it is my opinion that you were wrong.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I can't resist
Please explain how you would know that more people died as a result of the election…I would love to have the ability to perceive alternate futures…
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
I already stated that I didn't want to get into this kind of topic
But I’ll answer your question.
I just mean like by an elected leader doing something that led to deaths that the other candidate explicitly came out against; a certain war, for example.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
So
as with you deloss arguments, you base your opinion by comparing known facts with your predicted outcomes…
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
Nope
I’ve said again and again that I don’t take anything away from what DeLoss has done prior to this; just that I disagree with his actions on this issue.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Subtle.
I think he meant how you know for certain that more people would die from the election of Candidate A vs. Candidate B.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
You don't know for certain of course.
But you can reason that if candidate B had not passed the same policies as candidate A then certain peoples’ lives would not have been lost.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
so you don't know for certain
yet you do know for certain that the other side is wrong?
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Direct quote:
“If more people die as a result of the election of your guy. Then it is my opinion that you were wrong.”
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Above that
“People are often…wrong. Just look at election results.” That’s a pretty direct statement.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Good God, I clicked your avatar.
I now have macular degeneration.
by divinebovine on Sep 21, 2011 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions
I did, too.
I thought it was a sexy lady. Then I had to splash bleach in my eyes.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Me?
Then my choice of avatar is having its intended effect.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I knew better. nt whills
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
I figure if it's no problem for certain people
to have pictures of naked women as their avatar, then I should be able to get in on the fun too regardless of how uncomfortable or grossed out it makes teh menz feel.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I was meh on the PAC-12
just for the record.
I still prefer the existing 10 teams and looking to add a couple.
Oh, PShaw
PShaw I say!
First, I completely disagree that PAC-mumble is the best fit for us. I recognize what opinions are like and fully acknowledge that many smart people disagree with me. But it’s an amazing stretch from there to say it fails the giggle test not to join the PAC, just as it would be an amazing stretch for me to claim the opposite. There are risks; there are upsides. If were were in a “Welcome to the PAC-16” thread rather than the thread we’re on, I assure you I would not start a “I fucking hate Dodds” post.
It also gives very, very little credit to our BOR, since it assumes they’re highly dupe-able by Dodds. Again, even if that were true, be mad at them for getting duped. Finally, it’s bad for us (the larger Texas us). Nothing, nothing in the public record suggests that there is even a hair’s breadth of difference between Powers and Dodds. You can be as mad at them for not doing what you wanted them to do, but sowing BS about a disconnect between them is irresponsible.
Why
Why should we all think it was the best option?
I’ve gotten a lot less enthused than I was last year. Remember, we would hardly ever see USC and UCLA.
No, actually, the plan being talked about
this time was a pod system of scheduling. We would have played USC and Oregon, etc. every other year.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
It doesn't matter
The minutiae of pods/no-pods/pods-with-wings is at an utterly different level that what Lookinforit is claiming. He’s claiming that it’s so utterly obvious that PAC-16 is the best move that any monkey could have seen it, were it not for the jedi-mind-trick that Dodds pulled with the BOR:
BOR to Dodds Bill thinks, and we agree, that this PAC-16 thing is a winner.
Dodds to BOR This is not the conference you’re looking for. You should have some cake instead.
BOR to All Let’s have cake!
Thanks for telling me what I'm claiming.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Has LookinForIt ever argued with burntorangehorn?
’Cause that one would never end.
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I've encountered this person.
Never debated them, though. (I like to think of it as debating or conversing, rather than arguing.)
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Someone should put the burntorangehorn bat signal in the sky
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Is there enough bandwidth for that neverending comment thread?
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions
I come from a place with neverending bandwidth.
Is it obvious?
The debates there are glorious.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I didn't
I told bu2 what you’re claiming.
What I’m telling you is that what you’re claiming is stupid.
Doesn't sound like you know what I'm claiming, bro.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Here's the quote
For the scrolling-challenged:
In short, yes, I think Powers was on board to move to the Pac-12, but I think Dodds had the BOR in his back pocket.
That is stupid.
Go with god, brah.
Since we're all using cliched memes.

"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
by LookinForIt on Sep 21, 2011 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
No, it's a fact
that what you said is stupid. Fact.
Shut up
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
2 in 6
Pods only give you a team guaranteed 2 in 6 years. And if it goes like the WAC, in 3 years they will figure out pods are idiotic and we would have been back to 2 8 team divisions and see USC at most 2 times in 8 years. We can do that from the Big 12.
McWilliams and Mackovic
That’s what they said when they fired Akers. Look what we got.
Pretty cliche, don't you think?
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
No, for you, it's pretty right on target
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Something right on target can be cliche.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
So why did he say "no"?
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
a cliche is an expression, idea, or element of an artistic work which has been overused to the point of losing its original meaning
With regard to you, it still has meaning.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Nah.
It usually just means “a trite phrase or expression” as Miriam-Webster defines it; “something that has become overly familiar or commonplace”.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
"a trite phrase or expression": pretty much any comment by LookinForIt
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Good one.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I'm sorry I pulled a definition from a different dictionary than you
That makes me wrong, obviously, just like anything anyone says to disagree with you.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
It doesn't mean you're wrong.
It just means I’m not.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
No, you didn't. Hopkins Horn did.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
No, he didn't. Not in this subthread.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I think
she’s in the middle of a drinking game that we aren’t aware of…
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
I hope she's getting blitzed
It’s the only way this makes sense.
EM: YOU’RE ARGUING WITH A BRICK WALL!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Hehe, he said "no".
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
You asked a question - "don't you think?"
He responded “no.”
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Em, he said "it's right on target"
as a counterargument to the idea that said memetic image was cliche. But it doesn’t matter if it’s right on target; it can still be cliche.
Not only was he arguing that his definition of ‘cliche’ was valid; he was saying that my definition of ‘cliche’ was invalid.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
and apparently right on target
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
I know it's a cliche
But my experience as a woman has led me to believe that the “men” who are the most sure that their opinions are fact and get the most upset at having them challenged are also the ones who are cursed with poor sexual skills and tiny penises.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Abe Lincoln probably had a tiny ding-a-long, then. Along with many other principled people.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Yes, you're exactly like Abe Lincoln
America should put you on a coin for your principled stand against the school you root for making money.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Also
“ding-a-long?” Are you nine years old?
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I don't root for UT to win so it can make money.
Do you really do that?
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I'm not sure whether that was a misread or a strawman,
but no. You seem to have a problem with Texas – the school you root for – making money.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
My opinions are totally, completely fictional
Please challenge that all you want!
by Hopkins Horn on Sep 21, 2011 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Oh well in that case
I’ll totally reconsider the booty call thing.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
I've long since lost track
Of what this argument is actually about, but similar to the 6-degrees-of-kevin-bacon game, I claim that the first one to a dick joke wins.
Ugh, god.
Do you even know where this meme originated? I do. I was there. It’s older than dirt to me. I really resent you, internet, for regurgitating memes ad infinitum.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
O rly?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Most people don't realize
that most of these memes come from a place so vile few mortals can handle it.
Maybe it’s for the best that they get them second hand.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
I'm perfectly aware of where they come from.
I’m a little surprised if you’re someone who is a regular there and someone who claims the moral high ground in relatively trivial discussions. But the more I think about it, the more the overall attitude fits.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Do you even know what I'm talking about?
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Oh my Lord
You have singlehandedly ruined this thread. You. Are. Awesome.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
SECede?....Whoop(s)!!
by kriess on Sep 21, 2011 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Let me guess,
you think you’re special because you spend time in /b/
It’s amusing for five minutes, beyond that, it’s only really useful as a meme generator.
TEXAS FIGHT
Joe Parker
Only Joe Parker would know, but Joe Parker takes our fears away.
You have been issued a warning.
graphic and completely out-of-context lynching photos are completely out-of-bounds
In order to continue participating on Burnt Orange Nation you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.
by run Bevo run on Sep 21, 2011 10:04 PM CDT up reply actions

"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
by UTLawGrad on Sep 21, 2011 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Bitter Sweet...
Sweet because I would love to keep the Thanksgiving date for us and….Tech I guess and watch the Aggies whine about it while they get hammered by LSU a few days later will be enjoyable all around.
Bitter because I honestly grew up loving that game, family is a house divided and we went to just about every game over the last 20 years and despite everything that has gone on, deep down inside I really wanted to continue it…yall know its the 2nd longest running continuous series after KU/MU right? Tradition is dead…
All in all maybe a break is in order, let things settle but I would like to see if restarted….like 5 or more years down the road, we have an open spot in 2019 and 2020 how bout then?
I have Aggie family, as well, and one played football there. I still don’t care.
End it.
SEC- Southern Evangelical Cheaters. Since Jesus didn't specifically mention cheating in football in the New Testament, they are good to go.
by dimecoverage on Sep 21, 2011 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
And replace them with who?
The Big 12 is a joke. It’s only a borderline AQ conference now. We need them on our schedule.
"Hey, don't y'all think that's beautiful right there? That crystal is SO beautiful. And it's coming home to Texas." - Vince Young
Big 12 -2 -1 has...
Four teams in the top 20 (not counting the Aggs). Four out of nine is not too shabby.
Joe Parker
Plymouth Rock didn’t land on him, he carved it into Chuck Norris.
You have been issued a warning.
graphic and completely out-of-context lynching photos are completely out-of-bounds
In order to continue participating on Burnt Orange Nation you must acknowledge your warning by pressing the OK button below.
by run Bevo run on Sep 21, 2011 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Joe Parker
once ran a marathon backwards, just to see what second place looks like.
"A&M has had every opportunity over the past 50 years to emerge from Texas' shadow, and failed." - Jean-Jacques Taylor
It would be hilarious if we beat them this year
It’s the first time in a LONG time where they actually have something to lose playing the Turkey Game, whereas in previous years it’s always been us with something to lose and they were playing with house money.
Now it’s the other way around. If we win the game, it would screw them up ten ways to Sunday, then we tell them, “Adios!” and never play them again, thus, no revenge.
Man, that would be friggin’ hilarious.
No so fast, youarejackburton.
We will have something to lose this year. We will be playing for the conference championship and a BCS bid. Hook ’em.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 21, 2011 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions
The glass is always half full for Paleface. :-)
SEC- Southern Evangelical Cheaters. Since Jesus didn't specifically mention cheating in football in the New Testament, they are good to go.
by dimecoverage on Sep 21, 2011 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks, Dime.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 22, 2011 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Half-full since the coaching changes.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 22, 2011 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions
I like it ...
… and raise you a MNC game spot!
Hook ’em hopefully
by BurntOrange&Blue on Sep 21, 2011 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I wanted to say that, but I didn't want to jinx it.
Now, if we aren’t playing in the MNC, it’s your fault and not mine.
See ya later, alligator.
by Paleface Horn on Sep 22, 2011 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh I know plenty of their fans thought they finally had UT
They seemed quite confused and pissed at their team about that loss.
TEXAS FIGHT
even better
What if somehow an unbeaten Longhorn team and unbeaten Bear team met in the 12/3 season finale?
Have Not Figured Out What Mizzou Has To Offer To The SEC
Maybe a boost in academic ratings, that’s about it.
What does Aggy offer the SEC?
Is adding a team (and likely two) without a renegotiated contract with ESPN worth televisions in Houston and Dallas? Do they really want to dilute the best conference in college athletics? Never made sense
http://www.twitter.com/orlansky_40as
http://www.twitter.com/JayMashBON
Aggy brings about 2 million fans
according to an estimated fan thing I saw the other day. That’s actually more than most SEC schools bring to the table.
TEXAS FIGHT
re: Aggy brings about 2 million fans
that’s 2 million fans who just a couple of short years ago could not see their game with their biggest rival on television anywhere… and thus missed seeing their beloved, if not-highly-telegenic aggies finally beat Tech in Lubbock! It’s as though television programmers didn’t know that the aggies “brought the Houston and Dallas markets”…
...I can't stand the Tech fans that go to their games
Frickin’ battery throwers and stadium destroyers (their own stadium even)
TEXAS FIGHT
Yeah, but it was awesome
when they ripped down their goal posts and jammed them in the Aggies section a few years ago.
Don't forget
They’ll rip out the seat they’re sitting in and toss it on up behind them. Though I suppose it shows the spirit that “WE DON’T SIT!!! NOT EVEN FOR A SECOND!!”
TEXAS FIGHT
if the ags have 2 million fans really....
then their entire administration should be axed for not capitalizing on them. Idiots!!
FIFY
then their entire administration should be axed for not capitalizing onthem.those idiots!!
The Houston and southeast Texas Multimedia market (TV especially)
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
And what does the SEC bring to the A&M mission?
That is, where is the academic voice of tamu in all this? You know, the same faculty and distinguished alums that called BS on the anti-intellectual, anti-research zealotry behind the politically inspired changes in academic affairs recently (which resulted in a reprimand from the AAU)? Maybe they do not give a hoot about athletics, but surely a largely contingent of aggies are concerned with academics AND athletics (I have in mind an alum who is concerned about his alma mater’s academic mission and likes sports, not billy-bob who roots for the aggies because he like the corps haircuts). What do those guys/gals have to say? Are they willing to let politically motivated/appointed leadership destroy what they are trying to build?
It does not really matter to me all that much as a Texas-Ex, but as a native Texan I feel like we owe our educationally-disadvantaged fellow Texans an opportunity to save face and save themselves from a move that they will regret for many years. Perhaps DD will offer an olive branch of some sort once the threat of no more elephant walks has fermented in the aggy psyche for a little longer.
by BurntOrange&Blue on Sep 21, 2011 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions
TV's
Its all about money
- St. Louis and Kansas City Markets are far larger than anything in OK, KS or Iowa
- Mizzou does not share the state with any other major or minor college power, meaningful to the networks
- Alright in most sports. Pinkel schedules his way to 10 wins a year and recruits well, basketball has been historically Rick Barnes light (lot’s of NCAA not much progress)
- Decent but not outstanding academics.
<You might not chase her, but after a few drinks you might not chase her off>
Having lived in Columbia for 8 years
I can tell you, MU does not bring the Kansas City or St. Louis markets with them. Kansas City thinks it is in Kansas, and St. Louis is a baseball town with little interest in college football.
this...
it’s one of my pet peeves with the whole realignment saga – someone “bringing” some market. As though Rutgers brought NYC or something. Just because someone is geographically located in/near a market does not mean they “bring” it. Hardly anyone in NYC cares about college football, and it won’t matter to them whether a team they won’t watch is local.
The PAC 12 is kind of the same way. I lived in the Bay Area, and the only people who talked about or cared about college football were the transplants who followed someone from out of state. All they know about locally is the “Big Game” between Cal and Stanford, and they actually think the entire country is waiting with bated breath to see how that comes out. Some markets are huge, but they’re not huge for every sport.
This is why Texas matters so much. They actually do “bring” the Dallas, Houston, San Antonio etc. markets, where people actually watch college games.
Mizzou is a good addition for the SEC, but not a great one.
The problem is that there are not any great candidates for the SEC to add. WVU? Louisville?
Not sure that's the real ?
I think the real question is: what do any of the big east schools have to offer that’s better than mizzou?
They could poach from the ACC
especially now that it just went up to 14 and they’ve got wiggle room to lose teams.
TEXAS FIGHT
That doesn't mean it won't happen or that the fee may be lowered
due to some circumstance or other. Look at A&M. They want to fork over 30mil right now.
TEXAS FIGHT
But who would they take.
They can’t get the NC or VA schools. They basically would have to take one of the schools in a state they already control (FSU, Clemson, Ga Tech) and against their “gentlemen’s agreement.”
Haha, No
If they don’t get hit for at least 20m+, there was absolutely no reason to raise the exit penalty. They’re not getting out for nearly what CU and NU got out for.
TEXAS FIGHT
I don't know one way or the other, but numerous media sources
have said that A&M thinks the real number will be around 15. This may be them assuming the conference won’t be around in a year and therefore they can’t be held responsible for the second year of revenues.
The "M" in "A&M"
Is for Mechanical, not Math.
ESPN just issued a statement on The Longhorn Network and realignment.
“The driving force on realignment lies with the conferences and universities. The Big 12 determined in 2010 to grant each of its schools the ability to create their own networks. As a result, the Big 12 stayed together and University of Texas made the decision to launch its network. ESPN subsequently won a competitive bid to become its media partner. We have since seen Kansas State and Missouri create opportunities while Oklahoma is exploring its media options. The concept of LHN remains the same as it was 15 months ago.”
Everything else is just whining.
Burnt Orange Nation
Follow Along on Twitter @TXStampede
Yes, Texas did what we said back in 2010
The Aggies signed the deal and then went to leave.
However, we are always looking like the bad guys.
A&M: Go, Ready,Set.....
We actually went above and beyond what we agreed to
Offering to split Tier 1 and Tier 2 rights and giving the other 7 schools their equitable portion of the penalties from Nebraska and Colorado, while A&M kept a higher portion.
We really aren’t very good at this bully role.
by Horncasting on Sep 21, 2011 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
The Ags can go to hell
They had their chance with the LHN. Don’t blame us because you sold your Apple stock in 1980
http://www.twitter.com/orlansky_40as
http://www.twitter.com/JayMashBON
by 40AS on Sep 21, 2011 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
What changed?
$300 million. That’s $240 million more than what people expected – nor did they expect it to get national carriage (which it will if ESPN wants it to). This is what caused all the whining and butthurt.
So this all comes down either to:
1) no one at A&M being able to do an undergraduate level valuation; or
2) A&M just not wanting to partner with tu
Frankly I’m torn as to which of these is more likely. Byrne really doesn’t like his “friends from the capitol”, but then again A&M turns a profit somewhere between Baylor and Tech. Hmmm…
Byrne in Europe
I think Byrne wanted to keep it together. He was in Europe when the Aggie board decided to leave.
Or just Directv...
You know the company that people get if they care about football since they have the NFL Ticket thing.
TEXAS FIGHT
Kind of off topic, but
Does anyone have a link for the historical data of TV revenue distribution in the Big12, going back to 1996?
Heh
Pat Forde:
Throughout the Big 12 turmoil, Oklahoma president David Boren appears to have been holding a pair of twos and playing it like a royal flush. We’ll see whether the bluff works now that the cards are hitting the table.
“He’s put his school in a tough position by getting so far out on a limb,” a well-connected college source said of Boren’s power play.
Every indication is that the Sooners have been focused on the Pac-12 for a while now, and Boren has had pointed comments about the leadership of the Big 12. But the above source told me Tuesday afternoon that Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott couldn’t get some of the most powerful members of his league to bring Oklahoma aboard without Texas — and Texas didn’t want to compromise its Longhorn Network television deal to join the league.
“I know that at least two [Pac-12] presidents out there are saying, ‘If Texas isn’t part of the deal, don’t bring that deal to us,’” the source said. “I don’t think Oklahoma has anyplace to go.”
Sure enough, the Pac-12 pulled the plug on expansion Tuesday night.
this entire thread should end with....
PB’s tag line…..
“75-37-5. Now GTFO.”
"Never Been Licked"
A silver screen classic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We%27ve_Never_Been_Licked
Army brat Brad Craig enters A&M with a chip on his shoulder which upperclassmen quickly knock off. Once adjusted, Craig falls in love with a professor’s beautiful daughter, only to find she is in love with his roommate. In the meantime, Craig unwittingly associates with Japanese spies (one played by William Frawley of I Love Lucy) bent on stealing a secret chemical compound developed in the A&M Chemistry Department. Craig is drummed out of the Corps for being a suspected accomplice to the spies, but he then bravely infiltrates the spy network to sabotage the Japanese war effort.4 Many A&M traditions are referenced in this film.
Screw the aggies
Dont let the door hit ya where the sheep you tried to rape bit ya.
Because being a Texas fan means never having to say you're sorry.
Joe Parker
talked with the PAC 12 and the Big 10 about joining and they offered to rename their networks after him.
Looks like bar-b-que Bevo day over there.
I don’t recall ever seeing anything that hateful on Bon.
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
Although we are a little rough with Aggy
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
That handful of geniuses
over there makes Texags look like the Algonquin round table .
That's quite a compliment
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
In the long run....and that may be as early as 2012...I don't think Texas will
have any trouble scheduling aTm….or anybody else for that matter.
If we stick to our LHN guns….as Dodds is doing….we’ll be independent soon enough and have plenty of room on our schedule to accomodate just about anybody.
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
Every time I read conference realignment
I wish Notre Dame would just join the conference. Play them on Thanksgiving.
He said "wish"!
It’s not like he thought it was realistic. Be nice.
if A&M wants the game that badly id be opened to negotiate it
For instance make it a neutral site game. Play it in Arlington or something. That way none of us ever have to go to hells waiting room again aka college station
formerly "Horns102591"
by horns1025 on Sep 21, 2011 6:31 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
How about we agree to play the game
but it has to be in Austin every year.
by BrooklynHorn on Sep 22, 2011 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Hey, it's a central location for the Texas Relays and the HS basketball state finals.
aggy might as well realize that it’s in the best interest of their fans to be in a central location such as Austin.
Go back to 12 with BYU, Boise State, and TCU.
North: BYU, Boise State, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, and Missouri.
South: Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, TCU, and Texas Tech.
Schedule Thanksgiving against Tech.
That would make a great 12 team conference
but could it happen?
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
Why not?
Maybe the specific divisions would be different, but that can be finessed. BYU is already talking Big 12. TCU can’t possibly be happy with the limbo the Big East is in, and the geography is better. AQ conference status has to be tempting to Boise State, and if they didn’t take the chance, how much credibility would people give their claims that they deserve to be treated as an important program? It’s not like the Big 12 is really in a position to poach any major players from the Pac-12 or SEC or B1G that would stop them from taking the three.
The only thing that would stand in the way is if Texas and Oklahoma want to keep hoping and waiting for invitations to the Pac, instead of building up the Big 12. I’d go and build up the Big 12 anyway, though; you don’t lose bargaining position in the long run by being in a strong conference.
There's no way they will EVER put UT & OU in the same division again.
Huge mistake the first time around that will finally be corrected.
Think OU is going to the B-12 north?
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
Okay, West and East
East as the Big Eight-Now-Six: Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State.
From the beginning in '96 (?) ...
I’ve always advocated for the 2 divisions to be “Traditional Big 8” and “Traditional SWC”. It coulda been:
Big 8: NU, OU, OSU, ISU, KU, KSU
SWC: UT, A&M, TT, BU, CU, Mizzou
Colorado woulda fit in well with the SWC teams. Mizzou woulda been the only odd placement – and woulda cheapened the good KU / Mizzou BBall rivalry but, besides that, it would have kept the biggest rivalry in the history of the Big 8 in tact: OU vs Nebraska. In the beginning, NU was the top program in the country but the conference quickly turned into UT & OU being 1A & 1B and the conference championship game was, quite often, anticlimactic. Now that NU is long gone, I don’t know that the Big 8 division would be very necessary. Well, if they are able to add in a couple of teams, it’ll be really interesting to see how they divide ’em up.
Actually...
it probably worked out well. Instead of OU or UT knocking the loser out of the BCS in the conference championship game, the loser has a chance to climb back up the polls in the regular season and take an at-large berth.
Also, with the teams currently contemplated, the CCG would almost always be a rematch between OU and UT if each team was in a separate division. That would get old. Allowing the second tier a shot at the title every year allows a team other than UT or OU to get some media run.
Not sure I agree with that logic ... but I do see where you're going with it.
Along your logic though, in these recent tiebreakers that decided the Big 12 South representative in the CCG, I think they should have adopted the old SWC tiebreaker rule: The team that hasn’t been there the longest, gets to go. In 2008, it woulda been TTech that went. In 2010, it woulda been OSU that went. It woulda been a nice reward for a comeback season for some of these teams. It was real boring watching the sooners play in those CCG’s when they were actually bested beforehand by the teams that sat home watching. In baseball, a one-game end-of-season division playoff game is always hosted at the park of the team that came-from-behind. Same principle.
What do you mean by "in baseball."
That is not the rule in MLB, and it wasn’t the rule in MLB before they changed it either:
Here is an interesting take on conference re-alignment.
Great players make great coaches, but great coaches make champions." DKR circa 1964
Not even going to read the Forde article below
but I’ll take Larry Scott’s phone time as interesting for sure. I would very much like a commissioner like that.
by Infield Elephant on Sep 21, 2011 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Sooners have absolutely no comprehension of what just happened
Even their headlines are completely a++backwards.
“Pac-12 Decision Not To Expand Could Be Posturing But Was No Doubt A Message To Texas”
wtf?
A&M: Go, Ready,Set.....
Well, they do live in Oklahoma...
OKLAHOMA!!! Who in their right mind lives in Oklahoma if they don’t have to? Yikes.
by iamjackburton on Sep 22, 2011 2:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Texas gives A&M ultimate insult
We no longer pay attention to them and no longer play them. Dead to me, they are. Best of luck to them in the $EC, but we should not help them out by playing them and giving them a recruiting benefit.
A&M: Go, Ready,Set.....
I'll just echo Hopkins Horn and LookinFort a little
and say this guy is a dumbass. His comments do not help us to navigate a rough situation. When you read the book on negotiation (and I have) – unrepetance is a terrible strategy.
I don’t see the risk analysis having been completed prior to the LHN deal. If it had been completed, we sure didn’t prepare any of our league partners for what was coming, or help them see how our trailblazing could benefit them in 5-10 years. That was dumb, IMO.
I understand there may have been a lot of thought put into this that I don’t know about, but it sure doesn’t look that way to an interested observer… much less a casual one.
As for what DeLoss has done for us lately…. I can’t really tell you.
(1) Our partnership with IMG has been lucrative, but I am not sure they understand a cooperative venture like college football as well as they understand entertainment. Entertainment you can do all by yourself if you have an audience. While Texas may have an audience, they’re not going to come if we play St. Mary’s every other week. We need quality partners.
(2) Despite an unlimited checkbook, he is 1/3 in football coaches hired. McWilliams was a mitigated disaster. Mackovic could have been a success had Dodds insisted that he keep the right people around him… add a stellar recruiter and keep a stellar defensive coordinator in Leon Fuller. Instead we got Gary Darnell. The Mack Brown era has been tainted by failing to push Mack to inject some new blood into the coaching staff – partially Dodds’s responsibility.
(3) Basketball continues to underachieve, again despite an open checkbook and great recruiting.
(4) Much of our fundraising success has almost nothing to do with Dodds and very much to do with economic growth in Austin and Texas in general, and raising ticket prices. Woohoo!
Now we’re on the verge of losing a league that has been very beneficial for us in a lot of ways, and all Dodd can say is “screw ’em.”
We give CEOs way too much credit and blame for what happens on their watch. This is just another example. Any semi-intelligent person could have accomplished as much as DeLoss, and maybe more.
I don’t disagree with shutting out A&M – but realize that this strategy could totally backfire. A&M might actually be able to ramp up recruiting and turn the tables on us. Lots of schools have been the top dog and gone on to mediocrity. Do we smoehow think what happened to Notre Dame couldn’t happen to us? It can happen to Texas.
End of rant.
by Erasmus Funderburke on Sep 22, 2011 10:31 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
A rebuttal
I’m not sure I have too much of a dog in this hunt, but I’m highly skeptical of the lack of nuance of the “this guy is a dumbass” line. I’ve a great deal of respect for HH, and I take his general point that Texas has generally not played the PR war as well as it could/should have. However, again, that seems to me to fall well short of calling Dodds a dumbass. Maybe HH can weigh in directly with more specific thoughts. I’ll say also that your post is at least detailed and meaty enough that it can’t qualify as “echoing” Lookingforit.
All that said, in the interest of your post not being the next-to-the-last in this thread, I offer the following rebuttal:
Big Picture
My very first thought reading your post was that you made a very salient point about CEO’s getting too much of the credit when things go well and too much blame when they don’t. My second thought was that it seems like you want to give Mr Dodds none of the credit and all of the blame, which seems counter to the very point you just made.
Under Dodds’s stewardship, The University of Texas has amassed 13 national titles and 100 conference championships. The Texas football program is the most profitable in the nation, with the basketball program coming in 60th overall (link here). Even in the catastrophe that was last year, the Texas athletics program ran a profit of $46.2M, and contributed $4.7 million back to the academic programs. Compare that to the vast majority of programs who are struggling to subsidize their athletic programs (only 14 programs turned a profit in 2009).
I get that UT was an extremely well-run program under Coach Royal so Mr Dodds had big shoes to fill. But I see nothing in any of the big-picture data to suggest that the program is suffering.
Football
The idea that Coach Brown’s hire is “tainted” by Mr Dodds’s “failing to push” Coach Brown into coaching changes sooner is laughable to me. Texas won a national championship in 2005 and played for another in 2008. Far from saying that Mr Dodds should have pushed for coaching changes sooner, I’ll argue that would have been dumbassery for him to push for those changes. You trust your people, as long as your people deliver results. That’s the very first rule of any management post, much less one at Mr Dodds’s level. Those results were delivered, delivered at scale, and delivered consistently, right up until last year.
And speaking of last year, there were people all over this blog last year stating with absolute certainty that there was no way, none mind you, absolutely zero, that Coach Brown would fire Coach Davis. Emphatic. Absolute. No chance. How much of a chance? Zero. Mr Dodds would simply have to fire Coach Brown to get rid of Coach Davis. There was no other way. End of story. Where are those people now? Clearly Coach Brown deserves the bulk of the credit for making the changes he made, and maybe those changes were entirely his (frankly, I hope so), but the idea that pressure from Mr Dodds should have come sooner coming on the heels of a second national championship run in 3 years is, let’s just say, unfair in my view.
Basketball
I’m really not much of a basketball guy, but according to wikipedia, Coach Barnes has led Texas to a school record 11 consecutive 12 consecutive NCAA tournament appearances and a school-best 11 consecutive 20-win seasons. Also, according to this guy, who seems to have spent some time thinking about it, Texas has not under-performed relative to their recruiting classes.
Indeed, as someone who has spent a fair amount of time among Texas “fans,” first as a student, then as an alum and Foundation contributor, I’d argue that there is much more evidence (booing Chris Simms off the field, hoping Texas loses so that Gilbert gets benched, ranting that Coach Brown would have to get fired to get rid of Coach Davis, etc, etc) that the Texas fan base, as a mass, a wad, is overly entitled, spoiled and very close to downright evil, as there is any direct evidence that the basketball team has “under-performed.”
LHN and Conference
I get that LHN is controversial, and I believed it would be from the get-go. And I am not necessarily in the camp that thinks LHN will be the greatest thing ever for UT, but nor am I in the camp of people that think it’s an absolute disaster. What seems more reasonable than either of those two extremes is to recognize that a) Mr Dodds in particular has a fair amount (I’d still argue not all) of his legacy tied to the success or failure of LHN, and that b) the jury is still out. It stands to make a significant contribution back to academics, at a time when that funding is sorely needed; we got a good price for little entrepreneurial risk; few can see it; and there are significant questions as to its long-term viability. Upsides. Risks.
Speaking of risks, the fact that neither you nor I saw a “risk assessment” for LHN doesn’t mean it wasn’t done, and while the specifics are likely better for a different post, a large part of the flesh-tearing we’ve seen and heard over the past few months has not exactly been in good faith.
I agree that a 9 team conference, with its current make-up, is less than ideal and not sustainable over the long term. I’d also argue that, similar to LHN, it’s not done yet. The jury remains out. Mr Dodds has some waters to navigate; it seems reasonable to wait until we see how he navigates them and see the ultimate result before making a conclusion.
by tx2step on Sep 22, 2011 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I agree with pretty much everything you said - just a small correction that we played for the NC in 2009.
We should have played for the NC in 2008, but we all know how that turned out.
Great rebuttal to a ridiculous posting.
You were much more tactful & succinct than about 95% would have been. You were rec’d by me!
Look,there are definitely days I agree with you, tx2step
But let me defend my post a little (as I was only echoing the two previous posters “a little”). First, calling Dodds a dumbass was a bit of hyperbole. I know he’s not a dumbass – he’s a bright guy. But like a lot of CEOs he let overconfidence and enthusiasm get his organization way out in front of his ability to control the situation – at least by all appearances at this point. (Yes, there are arguments to the contrary, but none of the “Big Cigar” talk has held water to this point).
Now rather than express some humility and say “boy we had this great opportunity, we didn’t realize people would get so worked up about it, but we’re really willing to work it out so that we’re all winners.” Instead he escalates is commitment to his previous position, essentially saying “Yeah, we’d like to keep everybody together, but in the end, ya’ll can go to hell, we’re Texas.” (again, this is a little hyperbole, but how it comes across to A&M, OU, and other schools’ fans, and more importantly, their boards of regents; I’d hardly say it’s “ridiculous” as someone else put it).
Second, you’re making a mistake in saying my argument about giving CEOs too much credit and blame for outcomes is inconsistent with some of my criticisms of Dodd. With the exception of basketball, I was talking about his behavior, not his outcomes. Two bad hires, one good hire in football. And yes, I still believe Dodds could have pushed Mack to move Greg Davis along in 2001 – after watching 2000 TX/OU and the 2001 Big 12 Championship disaster (when we blew yeat another shot at the national title!), the writing was on the wall – well before someone convinvced them to rework the offense to suit a superstar. If the notion that canning Davis in 2001 is laughable, well my guess is that sites like this one wouldn’t last long because that was half their content over the last couple of years. Seriously, we could have moonwalked in the 2001 Big 12 Championship and won the game.
In terms of our basketball program, the national perception is that we are one and two and done in the tournament. I read the same article you did. I understand there are counterarguments, but its not the only valid empirical argument. If you look at the number of guys we’ve put in the NBA, we’ve underachived. Being a freshman didn’t stop Melo from winning. I am not sure how some petulant fans relate at all to any of the points I raised. (For the record I never booed Chris Simms and sat through literally every minute of the 2000 TX-OU game… and the 1991 Cotton Bowl… ugh… no booing).
I think we actually agree on the risk assessment but are emphasizing different points. You put a lot of faith in the powers that be that they saw all tis coming and have a plan. I believe they did some sort of risk assessment. But I don’t think they really anticipated the whole thing unraveling as it has, and they seem unprepared to respond in a politically savvy way.
Hell, there’s a proud Texan part of me that loves this stuff.. there’s a more experienced, time wisened professional who has to work with politicians and big-timers who gets worried as hell when people start ditching institutions that have treated us pretty well. I don’t want to see us go the way of Notre Dame. If that’s worthy of ridicule… well, then OK I guess.
by Erasmus Funderburke on Sep 22, 2011 9:11 PM CDT up reply actions
MMMMMM I love me some middle ground
Almost as much as I love posting in 3-ish day-old threads. I’ll say these things, since it’s beer-thirty here and I’m feeling fairly happy.
FWIW, I agree with you on ND serving as a cautionary tale on independence. What’s somewhat befuddling to me is that you give Mr Dodds no credit for his stance wrt independence. Indeed, I would think the people who would have the least patience with Mr Dodds right now are the ones who believe independence is the best option, since that remains the only option he has repeatedly, and pretty emphatically, ruled out.
As for program performance, I’m as disappointed as anyone when we don’t live up to what I hoped for and/or expected, but it’s a big jump to me from there to the AD’s intervening in hiring on individual coaching staffs. Just thinking in my own work realm, it would need to be a pretty extreme event to have me tell someone who works for me that they need to fire someone who works for them. I can certainly think of some, but none of them is really performance related. Likewise, I would not take well to my boss telling me to fire someone who works for me (again, absent some HR, legal, etc reason to do so). Put another way, one doesn’t judge a CEO based on whether the VP of Sales lost a key deal; one judges a CEO based on his/her ability to deliver dividends and/or increased equity to the stockholders. Using that metric, based on data previously linked to, I argue that Mr Dodds has done quite well.
We can argue the politically savvy thing till the cows come home, and I always find it a fun argument to have. I have my own reasons for thinking that Sun Tzu would be pleased overall with how Mr Dodds has navigated the program thus far. I fully accept that otherwise perfectly reasonable people may (a) disagree and/or (b) not be big Sun Tzu fans; that’s all good. My only point throughout this thread has been that the hyperbole of “Dodds is an idiot/should be fired/screwed up the landscape of college football, etc” is, given the actual data we have, premature at the very least and most likely wrongheaded altogether.
How does ND serve as a "cautionary tale on independence?"
They’ve never been in a conference, whether in their successful years or recently, and they’re the 3rd most successful program of all time. If they had been in a conference and then gone independent and then promptly started to decline, I could see making that argument.
Whoever said laughter is the best medicine had clearly never tasted Scotch.
Couple of Problems
First, don’t drag Hopkins Horn into this mess, I really don’t think your post was an echo of anything he has said, but I could be wrong. If you want to associate yourself with LookinForIt though, be my guest.
Second, I also read the book on negotiation (or at least some of it, but I did take the class) and I think you are missing a huge point. You are confusing the public perception of Texas’ negotiation strategy with what their strategy is in the actual negotiation, which we are not a party to. While Texas may seem unrepentant to you, you and I have no idea what they were like in the negotiation. Now from what I remember from my class, one of the most important parts of a negotiation is to earn and keep the trust of the individual or party you are negotiating with. An easy way to lose that trust is to discuss what is happening behind close doors in the general public. Texas remaining quite, which to your perception may have made them seem unrepentant, may just have been Texas honoring the closed door nature of the negotiations.
As to the PR ramifications of remaining quiet, when you read the book on PR, and I have not but have gotten advise from people who might have, the first thing you do is shut the hell up, assess the situation and determine if you actually need to have a public response or not. Going out there and talking your head off without a sound strategy will get you into trouble. A great example of this is Oklahoma. Boren may have been making headlines and seeming to have been winning the PR battle, but now he looks like an idiot.
by Wells on Sep 23, 2011 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Also, I propose establishing a $1000 fund
for anyone who gets on TV at the stadium wearing a shirt that says “JOE PARKER”.
by Erasmus Funderburke on Sep 22, 2011 10:33 AM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Joe Parker
better be careful before Joe Parker gets his identity stolen. I need to shoot PB an email and see if I can get my name changed to Parker Joe.
Do not be distracted by what you see, but be transformed by what you believe.
Wow, that pic at the top of the article is scary.
DeLoss Dodds is so Texas, that even his skin is burnt orange.











































