Texas Basketball Report 5.4: Longhorns Enter Critical Three-Game Stretch
Click here for previous editions of the Texas Basketball Report.
In my season preview I identified Texas' first three Big 12 games as a potentially defining stretch for this young Texas team and its chances to extend the Longhorns NCAA Tournament streak to 14 seasons, and conference play is now here after the Longhorns closed out their non-conference slate with a win over Rice to improve their record to 10-3 (9-0 at home). Building on Jeff's excellent primer on this year's Big 12, let's look a little closer at these first three conference games (at Iowa State, versus Oklahoma State, and versus Texas A&M) and why they're so important to the team's prospects.
To begin, let me lay out of a few important assumptions. First, let's assume that 10 conference wins is the magic number to feel comfortable on Selection Sunday. A 10-8 Big 12 record would put Texas at 20-11 overall heading into the Big 12 Tournament, with a solid shot at earning a bye into the quarterfinals. Although it's very much plausible that a Big 12 team with a 9-9 conference record could get a bid to the Tournament, a .500 mark would make for a very nervous Selection Sunday for Texas, which possesses a pedestrian non-conference resume.
Second, let's assume for present purposes that Texas goes 1-5 across the brutal six-game stretch at Missouri, at K-State, vs Kansas, vs Iowa St, at Baylor, and vs Missouri. Although the Longhorns have a reasonable chance to steal another win or two in that stretch, it would not be the least bit surprising to see Texas drop all five of those difficult games.
Third, let's also assume that in February Texas is going to lose at Kansas (we're not winning at Allen Fieldhouse) and at home versus Baylor (a particularly difficult match up for this Texas team). If Texas does in fact go 1-5 in its brutal six-game stretch, that's 7 conference losses for Texas, leaving the Longhorns with room for just a single other loss to get to 10-8. Although there are other paths to a 10-win Big 12 season, it's easy to see why opening conference play 3-0 would provide a huge boost to our chances to get there.
One way to measure how likely Texas is to win all three games is through KenPom.com's projection system, which currently gives us a 64% chance to win Wednesday night at Iowa State, an 83% chance to beat OSU at home, and an 86% chance of a home win versus A&M. Although that gives us a 96% chance of going at least 2-1, there's only a 46% chance we win all three.
Another way to look at our chances is to look at Texas' historical performance in home and away games versus Big 12 teams ranked between 50 and 100 in KenPom's ratings. (Iowa State is currently ranked No. 83, OSU is No. 76, and A&M is No. 85.) Since 2006 the Longhorns have played 38 conference games against teams ranked between 50-100, accumulating a 29-9 record (.763). Texas played 18 of those games at home, where they went 17-1 (.944) -- the lone loss coming in 2007 to, who else, No. 50 K-State -- while managing a 12-8 record (.600) on the road. Using those historical percentages, Texas has a 57% chance of going 3-0 and a 99% chance of going at least 2-1.
Either way you look at it, Texas is a very strong bet to win at least two of the three games, but is as likely as not to drop at least one. Again, assuming that Texas loses twice to Missouri, Kansas, and Baylor, plus at Kansas State, in order to get to 10 conference wins the Longhorns would need to pick up either 7 (with a 3-0 start) or 8 (with a 2-1 start) wins from the following 8 games:
Iowa State
Texas Tech
at Texas A&M
Kansas State
at Oklahoma
at Oklahoma State
at Texas Tech
Oklahoma
Texas could get seven wins with three home victories over Tech and the two Oklahomas plus at least three road wins and a K-State home win, or three home wins plus a 4-0 sweep on the road, which doesn't seem likely. Obviously, the odds of winning all 8 games also isn't likely (roughly 7% using KenPom win percentages).
Of course, lest all those low percentages dismay you, it should be noted that the odds that Texas loses all seven of its toughest games is even lower -- just 3% -- so there's likely to be a bit more room for error than in the most pessimistic scenario. Indeed, based on all the projected win percentages on Texas schedule, KenPom's numbers currently project Texas to finish with an 11-7 conference record.
The bottom line, though, is that a 3-0 start will be a very good sign that this Texas team is capable of winning 10 conference games this year. The first test comes Wednesday night in Ames (8 pm CT on ESPNU), where the Longhorns will take on an Iowa State team that shoots the ball very well, controls the defensive glass, and is as good as any team in the country in terms of getting to the line themselves while limiting opponents' free throw opportunities.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
nice quantitative analysis
After the football season I would like something to get excited about, but I think b-ball season will not provide that opportunity. I hope some of these young studs will stay a few years. I know there was a great analysis last season on the length a recruit stayed in school as to his value for the team. I was hoping the new CBA in the NBA would address this issue, but it appears to have not done so.
Thanks for all your contributions over the years. It makes for interesting reading.
Pardon the typos. Where is the splchec?
All new states are infested, more or less, by a class of noisy, second-rate men who are always in favor of rash and extreme measures, but Texas was absolutely overrun by such men. --Sam Houston--
Thanks
Not sure which post you’re referencing on the value of a recruit over time, but I’d love to see it if it’s something I missed.
As for this hoops team, I think if you look at the team in the right context this season can indeed be something to get excited about. Although our ceiling with this group looks to be a good bit lower than in many recent years, it’s really fun and interesting to watch this young team develop, and Barnes has done a really nice job of recruiting a class that features players we should absolutely expect to stay for multiple years.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Isn't the Kansas game in Austin this year?
Watch out, I bite.
by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Jan 3, 2012 12:35 PM CST reply actions
Home-and-Home
With 9 Big 12 teams, everyone plays home-and-home with everyone else.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Ah, thanks for correcting me.
Gotta get used to this new schedule … and then re-get-used to it next year. :)
Watch out, I bite.
by EddieTheAlbinoSquirrel on Jan 3, 2012 12:41 PM CST up reply actions
Bad News Cowboys
Oklahoma State has clearly regressed on the court, and the future doesn’t look much better. Two players (Fred Gulley and Reger Dowell) have left the program in the past two weeks, which means that OSU’s entire 2009 recruiting class — which featured seven players — is no longer on campus.
Looks like we can chalk up a couple of wins here.
by TCB Orange Dino on Jan 3, 2012 12:52 PM CST reply actions
So Much Easier To Do The Math
With everyone playing a home-and-home schedule.
The easy part is the almost-sure wins:
OU x 2
OSU x 2
Tech x 2
That’s six. I think we beat Iowa State tomorrow with superior guard play, and then repeat that victory at home so that gets us to eight.
Split vistories with KSU and Aggie and we are at 10, although I am frankly unimpresed with an Aggie team that lost to Rice at home so let’s count two wins vs. the ESS-EEE-CEE-bound Aggs.
11-7, and a #6 seed in the NCAA tourney.
Away Games Are Never Gimmies in NCAAB
Home court in men’s college basketball is one of the best advantages in all of organized athletics with large fan followings. Much better Longhorn teams have done well to play .500 on the road. I’ll love for your predictions about an OU, OSU, TT & ISU road sweep to come true. But Peter’s got a more realistic outlook imho, those aren’t gimmies with this young squad.
Ten conference wins are going to be tough, no room for error, and will probably need an amazing upset win few if any here will be able to predict along the way to make up for an unexpected loss these kids will probably be learning from. If they can make the tournament after all of the early departures it’ll be one of Barnes’ best coaching jobs ever.
by RMHorn on Jan 3, 2012 2:02 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
True Enough
However, the Horns swept all three last year, swept OSU for the past two, and Tech has not beaten Texas in the past three seasons.
OU is much better than last year
Lon Kruger is a very good coach, and OU won’t necessarily be an easy out this season. They are playing pretty well so far.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Still not much care for the Big 12 by Lunardi...
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology
he gives credit to the top 4 of the conference (KU, Baylor, Mizzou, & K-State), but has Texas in a play-in game……and that’s it. I wonder if this conference beats up each other, will teams outside of the top 4 get their due consideration?
This was way too complicated for me. Too many, like, numbers n' shit.
Thanks for including at least one color picture I could enjoy. I guess it’s time to start reading and studying up on the basketball team to start my post-football therapy. But I’ll probably have to read this 10 times to sink in.
I’m still struggling with the fact that Baylor is significantly stronger that us in football and basketball. I just want to win one of those games. But in way it’s nice to watch a super young team because the low expectations make any goodness that they bring a bonus. Just like the football team started more freshman than any other program this year. GO HORNS!
I'm hopeful
And think we will win enough to make the tourney, but i’m starting to think that missing it for the NIT may not be such a bad thing for this squad.
We are not good enough to make it to the 2nd weekend, so getting to maybe make it to the finals of the NIT may be beneficial like with UNC 2009-2010. With Barnes as our head coach it may not matter because we will probably never go to another final 4 with him, but perhaps missing the tournament will A) be a wake we need a new head coach or B) wake up that Barnes needs to stop gettting 1 and dones or C) if he continues to get ones and dones, recruit replacement players
Not just 3 types of players
One or two and dones ( KD), Program guys that need one and dones ( Sexy Dexy, Gary Johnson, Aj Abrams), and Projects that waste scholarships
Maybe I’m not making sense so I’ll sum it up
If we miss the tournament, I’m hoping it will change something about the way Barnes or UT approach recruiting and coaching
Actually
I thought you weren’t making sense.
Barnes is not Izzo-K-Calhoun-Boeheim-Roy, but he is good enough unless you can actually get one of the above.
This team will look better if as and when Kabongo plays up to his press clippings.
I wouldn't say Barnes is
only worse than those 4.
I can name tons of coaches that do a whole lot more with a whole lot less talent and are much better than barnes.
Barnes is the worst late game coach I have ever seen, and has been the next to worst game- coach in Big XII the past few seasons ( the one worse was Jeff Capel, but he’s gone because he was awful). There was a time I thought Barnes was a great coach, back in 03.I thought there was no way Mack would win a national title before Barnes did, the problem is Barnes doesn’t recruit the right pieces. And he can’t seem to get fundamentals through to his players.
Take the way we have lost in the last 2 NCAA tournaments
UP 8 with 2 minutes left in OT, we let them go on a 10-1 or 11-2 run, sparked by the fact that Barnes teams usually can’t shoot FTs. J’Covan gets the ball inbounds and rather than wait to be fouled passes it to Gary Johnson who in turn misses both FTs, Ish smith sinks the shot and we are knocked out
UP 2 with 16 seconds left, Jordan Hamilton inexplicably calls a Time Out. CoJo doesn’t inbound the ball in time giving it to Zona. Derrick williams is fouled hard by Hamilton and makes a 3 point play. J’Covan then takes 7 seconds to get up the floor when there is 9 seconds on the clock , leaving us no time for a potential rebound/foul
These are just 2 of the famous cases of Barnes blowing the end of games due to mental errors by the players. I know Rick isn’t on the floor and making these happen, but the fact it seems to only happen to Texas ( and Pittsburgh, the Texas of the Big East) reflects the coach. We have had 6 players drafted to the NBA the past 2 seasons and have 1 win in the tournament to show for it. Its Pathetic.
Also, watch our games. Notice how many times the other team makes a shot as the shot clock expires, its RIDICULOUS! It hasn’t happened so much this season, but we almost also blow/lose games starting with circus shots by the opponent IE Kemba last year, Boggans ( I think) in the 07 3OT game vs Okie State, and a few more. Again this is not all on Barnes, but does stretch over generations of his players, he’s the only constant.
Barnes is a “great” recruiter. But actually fails at that, since he doesn’t recruit the right guys.
Speaking of the Big 12 tourney
How does that work now? Ten team brackets can be ugly.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.

by 






























