Texas Basketball Falls Just Short Once Again, Loses to Baylor 77-72
Nine. That's the total number of points by which Texas lost its three home games to Kansas, Missouri, and Baylor. And that's to say nothing of our 4-point loss at K-State, and 3-point loss at Baylor. And of course we opened the season by losing to Oregon State by 5 in overtime, and NC State by 3.
Following tonight's 77-72 loss to Baylor, this Texas team is an astounding 1-8 in games decided by 6 points or less. Coming in to tonight's game, Texas was ranked 320th in terms of "Luck" as measured by actual wins versus expected wins, a number which should only get worse after tonight's latest heartbreaker.
The Barnes-bashing monoliths will glom on to that number as reflective of our coach-they-love-to-hate. Alas, over the last five seasons, with the same know-nothing head coach, Texas went 30-25 in games decided by 6 points or less. Not that it will stop some of you, but if this team falls short of the NCAA Tournament, it will not be because of Rick Barnes.
It will be because of the players. Some of it's youth, but a lot of it is just dumb, inexcusable, low-IQ basketball. And I regret to say that the biggest reason this team may be on the wrong side of the bubble is its phenomenally talented point guard, Myck Kabongo. Make no mistake: the kid really is phenomenally talented. But he is also a very raw and uncertain player from a mental perspective. The senseless fouls that send him to the bench early in the first half. The senseless foul that sends Pierre Jackson to the free throw line with 12 seconds on the shot clock. The turnover meekly disguised as an entry pass into the post. The failure to execute what the coaches have instructed out of a timeout. The failure to execute what the coaches have instructed at the end of the half. The failure to stick with Brady Heslip.
I could go on, but it's too depressing. We needed Myck Kabongo to be better than he is in terms of his understanding of the game. That's the bottom line, and it's maddeningly frustrating because he is very much as physically talented as advertised. Don't get me wrong: Myck Kabongo is also a hard worker, an eager learner, a bright kid, and a terrific teammate, and he's going to be a great player. And hopefully a great Longhorn player. But this year he's merely been good -- a mixture of impressive talent, and really raw understanding of how to play at this level. And we've needed him to be better than that.
It's not just Myck, of course. The performance tonight of Clint Chapman -- a fifth year senior, no less -- summarized his entire career in one game, and every reason I've never been one of those who thought he could be a strong player: 21 minutes, 6 points on uncontested shots, a missed dunk on his lone contested shot, 4 fouls, and 0 rebounds. Zero. Dean Melchione could have managed a rebound in 21 minutes. So could I, for that matter. Zero.
Sheldon McClellan did his thing: one truly forgettable half, coupled with a half that makes you drool for more. And even J`Covan Brown, who -- God bless him -- has done everything in his power to haul this team on his back to the NCAAs, had an inexplicable brain fart and threw the ball away on our final possession to tie. It's been that kind of season, and when you look at how a team goes 1-8 in close games, that's the kind of thing that's happened over and over again, starting with that heartbreaking turnover at K-State on the botched hand off.
And then there was the second half defense tonight, which was as filled with mental mistakes as the first half in Stillwater. Whether it was Kabongo failing to stick with Brady Heslip -- who buried a trio of three-pointers across five possessions -- or Julien Lewis letting Gary Franklin shoot an uncontested three that gave Baylor the lead, our guards just played terribly unsound defense across the second half, losing track of shooters and struggling to stay in front of penetration. All after a truly excellent first half. The inconsistency is exasperating.
The unfortunate truth is that Baylor out-executed us down the stretch. They made play after play, and left no points on the board. We made a few senseless turnovers, missed three front ends of one-and-ones, and had our power forward get outrebounded by their power forward 16 to 0. Zero.
Good grief.
This season has always been about next year, but this team has teased us with its flashes of great play, and along with falling in love with these kids and how hard they play, I've grown to desperately want them to earn an NCAA Tournament berth. And it just hasn't happened. Not yet, anyway, and time is fast running out. There's lots to be excited about for next year, but it doesn't make this year any less frustrating, or disheartening.
For the record, none of this is to say that Rick Barnes is above criticism. He's made mistakes, and he has weakness to improve upon himself. And those who wish to discuss that in a substantive way are more than welcome to do so here -- indeed, such constructive criticism is encouraged. With that said, those who want to yell for Barnes to be fired will be dismissed as the know-nothing candyasses that they are. And I make no apologies for that.
On that note, I'm going to retreat to three six fingers of scotch, and hope that this young group of fighters has one last rally in them down the stretch. And that for once they don't fall just short.
Hook 'em
236 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am right there with you
This loss stacked on top of the other close ones is just too much.
Have to give the team credit for keeping their head up after each devastating loss. But some scotch is about where I am at as well.
Follow me on twitter @kennylrobertson
gee, imagine how THEY feel
what are we crying about?
Your right...
as a fan this is very frustrating. But, the players have to feel even worse if they really care about their kraft. Course, its 1:40 am and I’m on my second glass of wine. :-)
This team is about where my expectations for them were going in to this season. 6 freshman and only 1 decent experienced player. Keep working and grow fellas.
"Risks Surround everything worth having, hide from risks and you hide from its rewards..............SUCCESS"
That is kind of what I was getting at.
Maybe didn’t come across that way.
Follow me on twitter @kennylrobertson
Myck Kabongo
Hes not a MAN if he doesnt come back to play next year. There is so much unfinished business and this team has so much potential, that if he leaves, I wish him the worse in the NBA. Jordan Hamilton came back and partially redeemed himself. Its time for Kabongo to look at the right thing to do: come back.
Hey now
The kid’s been a terrific Longhorn, an outstanding teammate, and he’s represented himself and this university very well. There’s no need to wish him ill if he doesn’t return. Let’s just hope that he agrees with you that there’s unfinished business.
Hook ’em
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Pretty irrelevant
No way Kabongo has any draft stock at this point. He has to come back for another year at least.
And for the record, there’s no reason to attack him like that. Agree with PB.
But there is undoubtedly unfinished business.
Disagree
He has so much more physical tools than CoJo I cannot see him not going in the first round if he exits this year. Baylor has some NBA talent, and basically Myck could get to the rim whenever he wanted. Admittedly, he doesn’t have a great feel for the game right now, but NBA is more about talent than execution anyway.
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
OVER-RATED
The guy came in with very high praise (kin to John Wall or Kyrie Irving)…and he shows nothing more than sprinter speed and decent touch. Plays piss poor defense – careless with the ball – and has no feel for the game. Let him go…I’d rather Sterling Gibbs run the show
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 12:50 AM CST up reply actions
Really?
Like really?
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
Let him go?
Are you kidding? Not worth a real response.
I still think we get in the big dance barely
assuming we win against OU and TT and can win at least one game (2 would be better) in the Big 12 tourney.
Our RPI is good enough to get us in (barely)
I'll take a bid any way it comes
Hope you’re right. We need to finish strong, that’s for sure.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
I'd like to agree
But conference tourney wins mean NIOTHING if your team does not win the championship game. The committee has their minds made up before the tourney even begins.
I agree with you on some things
Chappy’s 0 boards was inexcusable and shocking.
Still, this team doesn’t seem to practice late game situations. Blame it on low Basketball IQ’s all you want and inexperience but I’ve seen the same thing happen the past couple of seasons. I’m not calling for Barnes’ head after this game, but I do think that this one is on the coach. Not opting for the quick 2 down three was awful. I guess part of that could be screw ups by the players, but I think it comes down to being aware of the situation. None of them seemed to be on that possession and as a result too much time passed and 0 points.
We aren’t in the huddle or practice . We have no idea what the coaches stress or what the team is told to do. When this has happened player to player to player something needs to change. Barnes needs to change something with his style, recruit smarter players or go for more mixed classes or 1 and dones and 4 year guys.
I guess its a difference in philosophy. At least at the collegiate level, I blame the coaches
if the team screw up royally or the team repeatedly loses the same way. They need to practice better with late game situations, or what not. If a team executes and does what it should, then the coach has done its job. If the team pulls an upset the coach gets praise.
I’d blame it on the players if this was a 1 year thing ( Like I’d put 2010 football on the Sr leadership, and some of the OC/DC). But the past 3( you can even say 4) years we have just been difficult to watch, when it matters. Not saying that last season wasn’t fun for the first 25 or 26 games, but the finishes are what gets me.
This team shouldn’t get into the tournament, they really don’t deserve it. Especially if they finish 19-13 after the Big 12 tourney. Believe me I’d love to see them win a game or 3 in the Big 12 tourney, but they just don’t look up to it. The NIT won’t be that bad, as long as we get to NYC
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
Good Article
Until the last two paragraphs. How long have you been a fan of Texas Basketball? And of those years, how many times have you found yourself saying…“wait ’til next year”? My guess is you don’t want to admit it, but all but one or two. This team is young – but who cares? Nobody else does. This team is extremely undisciplined (hello coaching). This team doesn’t make free throws in the clutch (no other Barnes team has…umm coaching?). This team doesn’t know how to execute on offense when the game is on the line (getting old, but RB please come on down).
Point is, the guy wastes talent…plain and simple. Go back over his tenure and tell me how many teams actually improved as the season went on versus how many digressed? You won’t like what you find. Outside of a handful of coaches, we could buy just about any coach out there, but DD and boosters are happy with what we are – and that’s a mediocre team. That’s all we will ever be with Barnes.
I appreciate what he’s done (great recruiting, consistent 20+ win team, tournament entries)…but problem is, he’s done all he can – we need an elite coach to take that next step. Players alone can’t win championships…ask KD and Memphis – you need that extra element of coaching (hello Shaka Smart). He just ain’t it. We are what we are and that’s a program full of talent who underachieves every year. We are a fan base that says “next year will be different” but it will always be “next year”.
I challenge our readership
To try and construct a more ignorant comment than this one. Might make for a fun offseason contest, actually.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
I challenge our ownership
To try and come up with a more underachieving program over the past 15 years? You call me ignorant and raise you naivety. I made the point on the open thread tonight comparing this team to ND (your other alma mater)…substantial difference in coaching here. I have watched just about every big east game this year and i can unequivocally say that Texas has much more talent than Notre Dame – but look at what Brey does compared to Barnes. He gets the absolute most out of his players. What say you now counselor?
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 1:20 AM CST up reply actions
Since you brought it up...
You want a quick comparison of Brey v. Barnes? Sure. Ken Pomeroy’s records go back to 2003, which conveniently gives us a neat 10-year snap shot, if we count this 2011-12 season.
Mike Brey: 211-107 overall (.664), 98-64 Big East (.605), with 0 conference titles and 5 Tournament bids in 9 seasons (Seeds: 2, 6, 5, 6, 5)
Rick Barnes: 245-89 overall (.734), 106-47 Big 12 (.693), with 2 conference titles and 9 Tournament bids in 9 seasons (Seeds: 4, 8, 7, 2, 4, 2, 8, 3, 1)
FYI, I also compiled the average Pomeroy ratings for both conferences for each of those 10 seasons, and the Big 12 comes out slightly ahead at .8530 to .8505, so no “the Big East is harder” nonsense, sir. And probably needless to say given the way Brey often schedules his non-con season, Barnes has faced the tougher strength of schedule, average of 28th toughest overall schedule each year, ahead of Brey’s average of 45th.
Seriously, you have no idea what you’re talking about.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Easy Now
I think you’re taking this a little personal…I know EXACTLY what I’m talking about. I appreciate the stats — what you COMPLETELY discounted was the players Brey has had to work with compared to Barnes It’s not even close. I think most outside the Big 12 would argue that the Big East is much tougher year in and year out (top to bottom) than our Big 12. The guy has won 3 conference coach of the year…and perhaps 1 national coach of the year. My point is that he’s doing it with a decent roster…compared to Barnes, who has rock solid players every year.
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 1:29 AM CST up reply actions
How many graduate early?
Honest question because obviously I don’t follow the Domers of the Hardwood. I’m just wondering.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
Valid Point
Not many leave early – somehow we get these one or two-and done guys. My point is, over the past 15 years you would think that we would have more than 3 elite eights and one final four to show for all this talent.
My opinion is that our coaching is weak – you may disagree…and I can’t change your opinion…I can only hope to try…ha!
My question to you and PB is – if this is as good as it gets (i.e. no championship game or title) with all the talent we bring in every year…will you be satisfied??
I won’t apologize by saying, NO, I’m not satisfied!
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 1:49 AM CST up reply actions
No need to say you're satisfied with less than wanting a championship
I’m glad that you care. Really, I am. (Like really-really, that’s great. We need more Texas fans who care.)
But I think you’re wrong in how you’re evaluating Barnes. See my last comment below to McLovin. I’ll address y’alls positions in the offseason, but since we’re clearly on the same side here, let’s leave it for later and root on the team for now.
I’ll offer my arguments against the anti-Barnes position at a later time. I think y’all are blinded by only seeing Texas up close, as reflected in — for example — wanting Mike Brey (barf), but I’m glad that your heart is in the right place. I’ll do my best to set your brain straight, and if after I offer my best counter-argument you still disagree, we can take it from there.
I could be wrong, but we’re going to bang this out on the facts.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Clarification
I don’t think Brey is the right fit for Texas but I do think he is a better coach by his consistent output relative to the hand that he’s dealt compared to Barnes. I appreciate what he’s done for the program, however, I think it’s time to upgrade…and yes, I think there are better out there who would want this job.
Factually, RB has done a good job but I think in all of our jobs if we were to produce the output he has, provided with the ammunition he’s had over the past 15 years – we would all be looking for a new job.
It all goes back to my earlier position that our teams seem to digress as the year goes on compared to other teams who get better come March.
The only way this argument will be put to rest is if Barnes takes a team to the title game (doesn’t have to win it necessarily) or if someone else comes in and does it to the Barnes fan chagrin. My firm opinion is that it will never happen in Barne’s tenure at Texas…I just don’t think he’s that caliber of a coach.
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 2:05 AM CST up reply actions
Look, it's not personal at all
In fact, I explicitly published a warning in my post. This isn’t personal, it’s about the facts.
I’d argue against anyone on the wrong side of the facts. You just happen to be the one offering them.
Texas is every bit the football school that Notre Dame is. So I’m sorry, your point is just irrelevant. Both coaches get judged on their actual accomplishments, and yes, that includes getting the best players to your school. Barnes isn’t coaching at Kentucky here. He’s at Texas, which I know I don’t have to tell you is no more a basketball school than Notre Dame is.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Historically
yes, Notre Dame is a rich basketball program, but not over the last 10-15 years. Recruiting does matter and Texas has compared to Kansas, Kentucky and UNC in recruiting over those years…well, at least in the same vicinity. Notre Dame has not. Have they had a top 10 recruiting class since Brey has been there? NO.
You can’t say that this point is irrelevant. It is completely relevant. Brey is just one example…point is he gets the most out of his players as they play above their grade compared to Barnes who consistently gets average results with PTP’ers
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 1:45 AM CST up reply actions
You know, Brey might be the reason they no longer get top recruits
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
or maybe Matt Doherty.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
I would argue
better comparisons are Ohio State and Florida. Two state schools with virtually unlimited resources.
Recruiting is part of a coach's job.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
i will say: stats aside, EXPERIENCE and playing with the same guys for 3 or 4 years
that makes a HUGE difference. if we didn’t play 6 freshmen, you might have a point, but…
(they call it the sophomore leap for a reason)
You have watched about every Big East game this year?
That’s virtually impossible in that league.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:35 AM CST up reply actions
He makes valid points
. Your of the opinion that it is more on the players, and have brought up examples from 03-04 to prove that Barnes in fact can coach late in the game. The thing is though this team is textbook recent Barnes teams. The wait till next year mentality? Check!( 08-09, though 09-10 would be great, then though 10-11 would redeem 09-10). Undisciplined? Check!( that collapse of 2010, the minor collapse of last season, the end of the Zona game!). Not Making Free throws? ( Check! Every season except 06-07 and 05-06 pretty much). Not executing an offense ( Last year vs Zona, 09 vs Dook, a couple others).
He does waste talent I don’t get how you don’t see it. I don’t want to sound ignorant though, Barnes has done a lot for our program. But he’s an awful game coach. Plain and simple
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
You're a Barnes hater, we get it
And this offseason, I’ll spend some time eviscerating your ill-informed arguments. But make no mistake: you are ill-informed. And badly so. This is not the “constructive” criticism I was referring to in my post.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
I really don't want to be seen as a Barnes hater
Can you explain to me ( and all others who think Barnes is a flawed coach) how our arguments are ill informed? Is it because we see things differently? Can you please devote a post to informing us? I think it would save you a lot of time in the long run.
I’ve watched every game that I possibly can for this team since 2004-2005. I I’ve watched enough of his teams to see his flaws of coaching. One can argue that its not him that’s the problem, which I think could be fair this season. But I disagree about the past 2 years. And when mistakes like the ones I see in our current players are being repeated from the past guys, I see it as a coach.
I’m not a Barnes hater, I would much rather him prove me wrong. I don’t know him personally, so I have no reason to dislike the guy at a personal hating level.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
by Mclovin1035 on Feb 21, 2012 1:44 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes, I will engage your arguments
And I will attempt to show why calling for the replacement of Rick Barnes is — in my view, with all the facts I will point to — absolutely unsupportable. You can decide after that whether you still disagree.
Let’s save that for the offseason, though. We’re clearly on the same side here, and I’m probably reacting more harshly than is warranted because there are plenty out there who show up after losses to call for Barnes’ head even though they aren’t really basketball fans. Bevomav comes to mind.
Anyway, I’ve probably been too abrasive to you and LonghornGerry. I think you’re both dead wrong, but I appreciate that y’all want to talk about it substantively. That’s a good thing.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
I don't want to see him fired. But I think it's time to light a fire under his ass.
Based on this:
http://basketball.about.com/od/coaches/a/coach-salaries.htm
I think his pay is out of alignment with his results. We need to make the last, say, $600K of his salary contingent on tournament results.
I think Barnes is a good coach, a good guy and the best basketball coach UT has ever had, but I think we have enough data points to know what to realistically expect from him and maybe a monetary incentive will inspire him to address the weaknesses in his program.
So...
If we yank some money away, he’ll wake up and say, “Gosh, now I’ll get on to addressing my weaknesses.”?
Come on. You can think that Barnes isn’t going to get to the top of the mountain, but the guy’s not suffering from a lack of effort here.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Actually I do sense a lack of effort.
And it’s manifest in the quality of the recruits, for one. As mentioned elsewhere there have been some costly (to the program) recruiting misses. Also, in the lack of development in some of the players, and yes, in some of the resignation he’s shown lately in interviews. As an employer, I wouldn’t want to see someone making $2.4 million a year moping around.
Mack got jolted back into reality by not going to a bowl, maybe Barnes will feel the same shame if he misses the tournament and similarly reignite his program.
But OK, to cede your point. Let’s not take money away, which would be perceived badly, and rightly so. But maybe add another $500K in incentives that are based only on tournament results. That would friggin’ fire me up!
So Bill Self should be considered a largely unsuccessful coach over the past 8 years?
Outside of one outstanding (and lucky) Tournament run, they’ve largely disappointed and often in horrifically embarrassing ways.
If you’re going to put a performance bonus in, it would make much more sense to make it based on conference championships…in which case Barnes would already have cashed in a few.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
Holy shit, dude.
If Barnes get one outstanding and lucky National Championship run, I will shut up for eternity, regardless of pay.
Self has five Big 12 Championships, 7 regular season Big 12 championships, plus other conference championships he’s earned in other conferences I can’t even recall.
Simply not a valid comparison. Barnes hasn’t won a single post-season tournament at UT and only one in his career and that was about 18 years ago.
I think we all feel this way
If Barnes were to get lucky and win a title, everyone who is tired of the way Barnes teams have played since DJ left, would shut up.
I don’t see it ever happening with him, but if it did I would be the first person to say I was wrong and be more than happy to do so. I definitely think he needs to change something to his in game approach, and recruiting strategy
1. Take accountability- Instead of blaming it on his players every time something goes wrong, he needs to take it on himself to take the fault ( at least occasionally) and try to instruct them better
2. Reevaluate Recruiting- Do a better job mixing one and dones with program guys. Recruit smarter players if that’s the problem.
3. Practice- Change up practice. Work on more late game scenarios and execution. Though we don’t know how much he works on this, practice makes perfect. Less boneheaded late plays will happen if the guys are working on the scenarios more. For example the last possession again Mizzou and the 73-70 possession last night. If the players were prepared better for either of those, we could’ve won Mizzou and cut the deficit to 73-72 with 20 seconds left or at least been on the line to do so.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
by Mclovin1035 on Feb 21, 2012 12:49 PM CST up reply actions
I think I've solved this whole thing. We need a new court.
I’m certain the fact that performers like Miley Cyrus and Hannah Montana have performed in the same venue has cursed the program and we won’t see any championship until we purge those demons.
UT needs to build a basketball-focused stadium and the sooner the better. Open up your checkbook, folks.
And, to be clear. I like Barnes and want to keep him, despite
his lack of championships. As I stated, I think he’s the best coach UT has ever had and I think there are only a tiny few potential upgrades available out there.
At the same time, I do think he needs to up HIS game a notch if UT is going to see championship runs in the future. Whether it’s hiring new assistants, reassessing his recruiting practices, learning somehow to connect with his players better, challenging himself to expand his offensive knowledge, or whatever.
Barnes has raised UT basketball to a level it never knew before but I think that if things stay the same, we’ll see the same results. I want to see him improve, not be removed.
Cut His Pay
And Rick would find a new job at a better basketball school for more money in a heartbeat.
Not me but
some would say that this is a good thing…
Because being a Texas fan means never having to say you're sorry.
by dukeoforange on Feb 21, 2012 5:57 PM CST up reply actions
I think you completely miss the point
And of those years, how many times have you found yourself saying…"wait ’til next year"? My guess is you don’t want to admit it, but all but one or two.
This year was ALWAYS about next year. That sort of thing happens when you lose 3 underclassmen to the FIRST ROUND in the NBA draft.
2009-10 was about 2009-2010
2010-11 was about 2010-2011
We are NEVER looking to next year as an excuse, but when the cupboard is bare, you have to build and prepare for the season. You ask PB how long he’s been following basketball. I ask you, how long have you been following PB’s posts on basketball? If you answer longer than 6 months, then you’ll know how he thought out the season would play, and in NO WAY at all, did he ever tend to think that this was a wasted season, and that we should look ahead.
You lose what Rick lost last May, and you have no choice but to rebuild. Was there anyone calling for Roy Williams’ job in 2008(or was it 2009?) when he missed the tournament? No. Because REAL fans knew what he had working. He was brewing up a damn talented young class with some great freshmen coming in. Sounds familiar.
He also happened to cut down the nets the next year.
Giving up on a season or a team because it isn’t living up to the expectation you’ve (not you in particular, but the collective “you”) devised inside your head shows your true colors. And its not burnt orange. Its yellow.
We aren’t waiting for next year. We’re waiting for Rick and this team to marinade and mature. I’m sure you’re (now I am calling YOU out in particular) one of the folks who wanted Mack Brown’s job after a mediocre 8-5 season because that’s just not “Texas’ standard”. Sit back and relax. Things will get better.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
Tough Comparison
with Rick Barnes and Roy Williams. Roy has reloaded and rebuilt, but his teams are consistently in the final four (7 times in the last 20 years)…with two rings to show.
Teams now a days reload with a highly ranked freshmen class all the time and make runs…but I agree..every once in a while it doesn’t happen (UNC is a prime example). Here’s where the RB kool aide drinkers miss my point….the difference is, outside of two seasons we have completely underachieved with the talent on the floor. I point to coaching. I don’t like blaming refs or youth.
Every coach is entitled to having a bad season or two…but the good ones get to the championships. Mack has had lackluster years (not many) – but he’s one on the big stage. And if Colt doesn’t go down in the first I FIRMLY believe that we have two rings and not just one…but that’s another thread
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 1:38 AM CST up reply actions
I wasn't comparing them side by side
I was referring to the constant vagina rubbing by some fans about a sub-par season, and how that its overblown. I completely agree that they are on two completely different tiers of college coaching.
Thing is, we didn’t have a highly ranked class coming in. Kabongo and McClellan were good, but it paled in comparison to the Arizonas and the Kentuckys. Secondly, we knew going into the season we lacked any real offensive big man, or even a good defensive big man outside of the few minutes we could get out of Lexi before he hulks out and starts picking up a foul per possession.
On Rick and his team for being consistent underachievers…I disagree. I think Rick’s biggest problem is getting his stars to stay an extra year or two to develop the rest of their game. I think playing together and learning different facets of the game would make a world of difference. Now obviously, if you’re a Kevin Durant….you go. But a Jordan Hamilton, Cory Joseph, Avery Bradley type of player needs to stay. I understand that when someone flashes 7 figures in front of a 19 year old kid, the whole game changes.
I also believe that his ability to coach FT’s (this year) and improve defense the past 4 years have been great. Our offensive identity requires a big man who can score in the paint at will. We don’t have that. If you want to blame Rick for underachieving, blame him for not having the foresight to recruit another big man. Blame him for not having the foresight to see TT having a monster year last year. But don’t blame him for the team underachieving. This falls on the team. The whole team. Rick Barnes and Assistant Coaches included.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
Let me re-phrase a few things
We didn’t have an incredibly high ranked recruiting class. Very different than football where there isn’t a huge dropoff from 1 to 5. In basketball, it can be night and day.
Also, I’m not trying to berate you for having a differing opinion at all. If I got all riled up in my first post, I apologize. I guess it was the “wait till next year” comment that sent me over the edge. No worries. We’re all mad from the game.
I do believe that we differ on Rick Barnes, and I’m obviously not too thrilled with this season, but I expected it because of what he had to deal with. I think the blame is on the players inability to keep composure and their head in the games. The talent is there, but stupid mistakes have doomed them. Not much Barnes can do but make them run a zillion horses.
Now assistant coaches….I have no idea.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
Another question
is why we seem to get the one-and-done’s moreso than let’s say Duke (as a fore instance). Do other coaches have the foresight to not go after them or do the players realize that Texas isn’t the type of program where winning college titles is their m.o.? I don’t know, what I do know is that it is a problem.
I do think that most years we as Texas fans are left with the “maybe next year” mentality and it’s getting old. Other teams find a way to play to their strengths whether it’s a five-guard lineup or a burn offense…we don’t have an identity that as fans we can point to for future promise…and again I point to coaching.
This year’s class is pretty salty in my opinion and ranks up there with some of the elite – I was simply hoping that Texas would be able to put a better product out on the floor than what they’ve showed this year. I just don’t see it getting much better next year either…unless Myck sticks around and plays much smarter (as the qb).
by LonghornGerry on Feb 21, 2012 2:16 AM CST up reply actions
IMO, you points are all on track PB.
Stupid basketball IQ; no interior defense and one of the worst officiated basketball games I have seen in a while. I can count at least 6 times Baylor wasn’t called for fouls that were blatant. Shoving, holding and bumping. They really played dirty and the refs just let it keep happening. That said, this team deserved to lose for all the things you said PB. I actually would prefer that this team go to the NIT. I believe they will have a better chance at more games and more practice time in the NIT. Right now they’re a one and done team in the NCAA tourney.
"Risks Surround everything worth having, hide from risks and you hide from its rewards..............SUCCESS"
Agree on the officiating
This team can’t catch a break. Thanks for the good thoughts — agreed all around.
Except for one point: I deebated with a friend on the way home from the Drum about whether Texas would be better off going to the NIT (he argued for your position). I get the sentiment, and respect where you’re coming from, but I still think the team’s better off getting that experience of going to the Dance. You can’t replicate that experience, and even if it’s one-and-done, that’s worthwhile for what it adds to next year.
Plus, it’s the NCAA Tournament. Win and advance. And as we’ve seen, this team can play with anyone.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Thank you
Agree completely PB, although you articulate your position better than I am able to.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:16 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I see your point on The Tourney...
but the young players on this team need more practice time under season pressure. More reps… and time together. That’s why I prefer they go to the NIT. Chances for that to happen are better.
Also, Myck Kabongo needs to come back next year. Just not NBA ready yet.
"Risks Surround everything worth having, hide from risks and you hide from its rewards..............SUCCESS"
Agree that Myck should come back
But I’ll stick to my guns on the NCAAs. You take that berth 10 times out of 10. This isn’t the difference between a bad bowl and no bowl. This is the NCAA Tournament. That’s the entire point of the season. It’s what you play for, and once you’re in, you can win. Win six games and you’re champ, whether you’re the No. 1 seed or No. 12.
Given the choice between no post-season and the NIT, I definitely want the NIT. But given the choice between the Tourney and the NIT, there’s no question: NCAA Tournament, every time. No matter what.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Do you think he has a choice?
I don’t think he’s in a position like Joseph last year to surprise us.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:33 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah, he does
He’s a Top 20-30 prospect on most boards right now. The good news is that unlike Joseph, Kabongo can play his way into the lottery with a great sophomore season. So I think that works for us. Fingers crossed, anyway.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Wow
Thats a shocker to me. I like Kabongo, but what makes him a legitimate draft choice right now? His jump shot has been inconsistent, his defense at times has been piss poor, and I don’t think he’s near mentally prepared for the Nba.
All that being said, I am by no means a basketball expert.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:39 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
The NBA drafts on potential
And the kid has tons of it. His weaknesses Right Now are clear enough, but his upside is also very enticing. He could make that upside clearer by coming back, but even if he didn’t, he’d get drafted in the first round just on that clear potential.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Interesting
Definately think it’s in his best interest to come back though.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:43 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
i would humbly suggest
that it would be in anybody’s best interest to become a millionaire ASAP
Unless you can increase your earnings
by roughly 300-500% by coming back one year and developing your game. Terrible injuries aren’t that common in basketball as compared to football. But then again, I completely see where your idea is coming from. If I was 19 and had that much money flashed in front of me, it would be very difficult to pass up, unless I knew for a fact that I could make more by staying.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
i think the only thing that would make me stay
was if my personal goal / dream was to win an NCAA championship. for most kids, and understandably, the goal is to get to the NBA.
Due to the extremely strong draft this year
he would be wise to return another year. With great improvement, he could be a lottery pick next year.
by goingforthecorner on Feb 21, 2012 1:44 AM CST up reply actions
I was genuinely shocked by Joseph leaving last year
Shows how much I know about basketball. Any chance Chapman gets a chance somewhere next year at the next level?
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:50 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Probably D-league or overseas at this point
he has some nice NBA skills for a big like midrange J and occasional rebounding and shot blocking. As we saw today though, he’s not consistently good. Foul trouble continues to haunt him. At this point I’ll be surprised if he’s drafted at all.
by goingforthecorner on Feb 21, 2012 1:52 AM CST up reply actions
That's what I figured
Its been fun to watch his improvement this season though.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:53 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I'm with you on Joseph...
totally unexpected nor deserved.
No way Chapman gets a shot at any next level. No shot, slow and ackward. I like the guy and had hoped for so much more from him.
"Risks Surround everything worth having, hide from risks and you hide from its rewards..............SUCCESS"
Wasn't he pretty highly touted coming out of HS?
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:54 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah if I recall correctly
Think he was out of oregon..
by HookemHouston on Feb 21, 2012 5:49 PM CST up reply actions
Plus,
you have to think that making the Tournament helps with recruiting.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:49 AM CST up reply actions
Interesting.
Despite the final foul disparity, we were quite upset about the foul calls over at ODB. Realize that Baylor was called for 4 fouls on one UT possession.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:48 AM CST up reply actions
On that play, yes.
But Pierre Jackson basically had to get clotheslined by Myck to get a foul call late in the game. I was surprised what the final straw ended up being, but that was quite…physical…defense that he was able to get away with there.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:34 AM CST up reply actions
Without a doubt both teams got away with some stuff.
Happens in every game and seemingly especially in the Big 12. I was just making sure you weren’t pointing to that play as biased in UT’s favor.
I think both teams have valid complaints on calls,
but that there wasn’t anything egregious…especially in light of the no-calls in favor of KState in the game in Waco last Saturday.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:40 AM CST up reply actions
I don't understand how KState's entire team doesn't foul out every game.
Year in and year out they’re just hacktastic.
Yes,
they remind me of football teams that have great defensive reputations…that seem to allow them to get away with being more ‘physical’ than lesser talented defensive teams.
I wish that Baylor could play that aggressively on defense without fouling, but I think that part of the reason that Baylor is able to recruit as well as it does it that it’s a more attractive system to (elite) recruits than one like Kansas State. Well, that and the Scott Drew eats a fresh baboon heart every morning…
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
Why?
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
The thing is,
how long do you have to wait for Rick Barnes to win a title until you aren’t a hater?
If you look at every single coach in the NCAA who has won a title in men’s basketball (and was hired 1980 or later, which covers every title except one in the past 20 years, and that title was Lute Olsen, who was hired prior to 1980), and then look at how long it took them to win, Rick Barnes will have been at texas longer than any of them next season.
He had a consensus top 2 draft pick, and the best player in college basketball by a mile, and couldn’t get out of the second round!
There is no reason texas shouldn’t be competing for final fours and national titles every season or two. Freaking BUTLER made it to two national titles in a row. It it time for texas to get a new coach, and I’m amazed that you think otherwise.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 9:44 AM CST up reply actions
Well
I always thought the standard was championships.
If you want, lets take a look at championship appearances since 1990 then?
Indiana, Mike Davis, 2 Seasons
UCLA, Ben howland, 3 Seasons
Illinois, Bruce Webber, 2 Seasons
Utah, Rick Majerus, 9 Seasons
Ohio State, Thad Matta, 3 Seasons
Georgia Tech, Paul Hewitt, 4 Seasons
Butler, Brad Stevens, 3 Seasons
Kansas, Roy Williams, 3 Seasons
Since 1991 (20 years) there are a total of 17 schools who have appeared in the championship game, or won the title. For coaches first season to first title, the longest gap was 14 years. For a coach to make it to the game, the longest gap was STILL 14 years (same guy).
This was only for coaches hired after 1980, so Syracuse was excluded, but it only took Jim 11 years to make it to his first title game, and it took him 18 years and 3 championship game appearances to win one.
You can make excuses all you want, but for any coach hired in the modern era of recruiting / television, Rick Barnes will have taken the longest time period to get to a championship game, if he does it at texas.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 11:37 AM CST up reply actions
Using Championships as your only data point of merit is completely absurd.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:39 AM CST up reply actions
What is a better data point?
College basketball is HIGHLY dependent on coaching and the ability to get the best out of recruited players. The biggest change now is the length of time the best players spend in school, making the coaching of those players extremely important. Additionally, the recruiting must focus not just on one and dones (who are practically required to make a deep tourney run) but also on players who will provide solid veteran leadership for the team.
Showing how coaches have done since 1991 accurately reflects the changing nature of the game at the college level.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 11:47 AM CST up reply actions
But you didn't show how coaches have done in a very effective way.
Like it or not, the NCAA Tournament is not the best way to find the best team. There is too much randomness involved, which is why we love it so. Yes, good coaches at good spots that have lots of fan support should be expected to do well, but only looking at Championships is an awful way to do that.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
So your thesis is...
that any team that doesn’t win a national championship within 14 years of hiring their coach should fire them and move on.
Just so we are all clear here.
The basic problem that I have with this is that the historical data that you cite is not very likely to have any actual predictive value. At all. You are dealing with extraordinary small samples, and drawing insanely general conclusions, if I am properly understanding what you are going for.
Batshit insane.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
What Prashanth said
Using championships as the evaluative data point is completely absurd. The tournament is a crapshoot, for all intents and purposes. The standard is putting yourself in a position to win a championship. Rick passes that bar, in my opinion. Replacing him for someone other than the 8 or so coaches who are clearly superior is absurd. And those other 8 aren’t coming to Texas.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Yep.
Not that you asked me, but as a Baylor fan, I view Barnes as good coach who doesn’t terrify me. He and Drew will wage recruiting wars and the winner will likely be the better team that season. I don’t see either as being capable of pulling off what Bill Self has done this year.
But your last two sentences represent the key point. There are better coaches out there who could recruit as well as Barnes (or better) and coach up that talent. The issue is that it would be exceedingly difficult to get them to change jobs for Texas. Texas could offer them $TV, but you still have to question if Texas offers the environment for long-term success like UNC, UK, and Kansas do.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 12:04 PM CST up reply actions
What
do you define as putting yourself in a position to win a championship?
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 12:13 PM CST up reply actions
The tournament
is most decidedly not a crapshoot. People call it a crapshoot all the time, but of the past 44 teams to make the final four, 29 of them have been #1 or #2 seeds. There is a reason that of the past 20 title games only 17 teams have gone. The reason is that the best teams win the titles and make it to the championship game.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
29 teams have been amongst the top 8 teams in the country in that year?
Why is that surprising? If there were a college football version of this, don’t you think that the a majority of the teams to make it would come from the top 8?
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
Crapshoot
Something ( as a business venture) that has an unpredictable outcome
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crapshoot
Its not surprising at all 29 final 4 teams have been 1 or 2 seeds, generally the NCAA Tournament has not been unpredictable. It is most definitely not a crapshoot ( I get PB didn’t literally mean it)Sure you get a couple upsets here or there ( Ohio 2010, Butler the past 2 seasons, VCU 2011, etc) but in general the best teams are the ones playing for the title.
By Texas failing to reach the Final Four or even the 2nd weekend of the Tournament for that matter ( the past 4 seasons, including this one I presume) means that Rick is most definitely not putting us in position to win championships. Since 07-08 we have been a 7 seed, an 8 and a 4 seed and this year probably a 12/13 or NIT team. When you consider 29 of the past 44 final 4 teams have been 2 or 1, probably another 3-5 a 3 seed etc. It just doesn’t seem to me, that Rick has us in position to win a Championship.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
This is a much better argument.
I’d look at things like average seed in the tournament, average ranking by the various stat sites, and average conference finish to evaluate how good a coach was doing.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 3:41 PM CST up reply actions
I actually agree with ihavethemelody here
The tournament is not a total crapshoot. For most seasons of recent history, it has been won by one the best say 5 or so teams, based on final season SRS ratings. Not always certainly, but most of the time.
But it is not a clear line to go from this and his more general arguments, as they relate to what Rick Barnes’ fate at Texas should be. There is no solid argument to say that he can’t at this point have a future Texas team that will win the national championship.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Oh
and that list excludes memphis, who had their game stripped from them by the NCAA.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 11:40 AM CST up reply actions
Myck seems like such a bright kid
I simply could not believe the foul he committed at the end on Jackson (only Bobby Knight seemed to be more surprised). I’ll say this though. Jackson’s speed is comparable to Kabongo – either that or Myck has bad reactions to his drives.
Also, when we were down 3 at the end with the ball, I thought Rick should’ve called a timeout once it was obvious the play was going nowhere. We were either supposed to get a quick 2 or go for the tie, and instead we looked lost. Instead of Rick recognizing that, he watched JCB throw a terrible pass that was picked off by Baylor. Ugh.
by goingforthecorner on Feb 21, 2012 1:43 AM CST reply actions
Rick talked about that in the post-game
He said that he really thought about it, but that we had botched the last three plays he’d called after timeouts, and he thought that we might benefit from not letting Baylor regroup in a set defense, and if we weren’t going to properly run what he called anyway, then hell, might as well get the benefit of Baylor in transition.
Just sucks that J’Covan farted it away. As soon as he threw it, you could see on his face that he knew he’d blown it.
Heartbreaking.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Even though it didn't work out
I liked the call by Barnes. It sucked to see our best player screw away that possession though.
by Longhorn11 on Feb 21, 2012 1:49 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I think it's pretty sad that Barnes has no hope in his team successfully executing a play during a timeout
by goingforthecorner on Feb 21, 2012 1:53 AM CST up reply actions
He's exasperated
And I don’t blame him. I’ve seen that man draw up plenty of great end-game plays. I’ve also seen him mismanage end-games. (This is true of all coaches, though you only realize it about your coach.)
But this team just gets it wrong every time. It’s not Barnes. We know better. We have historical evidence.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
i generally agree with most all of what you say
is it possible that Barnes is a very very good coach & recruiter, and also just not quite the guy that can take his team all the way?
it is clear that there are better coaches than he in Division I basketball (though, not many)
but no matter what anybody says, there are top-tier programs of grand basketball tradition with unquantifiable advantages (Kansas, UNC, Duke, Syracuse) and then great basketball/sports schools (Ohio St, Michigan St, Texas is beginning to fit in here). But there’s no guarantees for anybody
How many different coaches (and programs) have won a national championship over the last 20 years? It’s special because it is so freakin’ difficult
Well let's look at them
UNC 93, 05, 09 (Smith, Williams—2)
Arkansas 94 (Richardson)
UCLA 95 (Harrick)
Kentucky 96, 98 (Pitino, T. Smith)
Arizona 97 (Olson)
UConn 99, 04, 11 (Calhoun)
Michigan State 00 (Izzo)
Duke 01, 10 (Kryzewski)
Maryland 02 (G. Williams)
Syracuse 03 (Boeheim)
Florida 06, 07 (Donovan)
Kansas 08 (Self)
Arkansas, Arizona, Maryland, and Florida stick out a little bit.
thanks, DoubleB
so there we are – that list obviously has the top coaches in the country on it (and the elite basketball programs)- and in 20 years, nobody won it more than 3 times, and only 4 guys (in total) have won more than ONE championship.
Fun Fact!
Every coach on that list was hired after 1980 and won their first title within 14 seasons except Lute Olsen, who was a pre-1980 hire.
This is Rick Barnes 14th season.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 9:45 AM CST up reply actions
Yep
and he was hired in 1976. And had his first championship game appearance in 11 seasons. I didn’t count coaching hires pre-1980, but he’s the only one that applied too. I actually said that in my comment, that I was only looking at coaching hires post 1980.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
had to laugh
how many times have we all heard an announcer say “i can guarantee you that’s not what coach drew up” ?
What historical evidence?
If you do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result, that’s insanity. For the past 5 or 6 seasons Rick Barnes teams have not lived up to their potential, and it can’t always be the players.
Meat? They're made out of Meat? Meat.
by ihavethemelody on Feb 21, 2012 9:55 AM CST up reply actions
it's based on personal experience
again and again and again this year. i don’t blame him
"I simply could not believe the foul he committed at the end on Jackson"
I could. On that defensive set and the one immediately prior he was overplaying his man, I was chanting at home – “Don’t foul! Don’t foul!” He got away with a bump or two on the first series, but not the second.
Following - I agree
though I would remove the “very’s”….it is tough taking a school that has a “football-first” mentality and building an elite basketball product. Thad Matta has done it at OSU so far, but I don’t see Rick doing it here.
Texas is relevant but they are not elite – I don’t think he is the guy that can take us to that status…even with all of his wins. He just doesn’t seem to be a good “tournament coach”. Good regular season coach…get’s us to the dance but doesn’t do consistent damage in the Big 12 tourney nor the ncaa’s
Does Florida feel that long ago?
4 Final Fours in the last 19 years with two championships.
Only Duke, UNC, Kansas, Kentucky, UCLA, UConn have as many or more Final Fours
Only Duke, UNC, UK, and UConn have the multiple titles in that timeframe.
No kidding?
I figured Michigan State would be in that elite grouping.
Eight Walls a new MMA blog from Fantake
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Eight Walls on Twitter
27-25 Live with it forever.
You're right
MSU is in the Final Four group.
Texas = Football
it will take another ice age to change that.
but Barnes has built UT into one of the top programs in the country. it might be the next guy that takes it to the next level, but if they do, it will be on the foundation that Barnes built.
Thad Matta at OSU.......really are you serious about it more elite than Texas in BB
OSU post season results
04-05 None
05-06 lost in 2nd round
06-07 lost in finals
07-08 NIT champs
08-09 lost in 1st round
09-10 lost in Sweet 16
10-11 lost in Sweet 16
11-12 ??
Comparable to RB but not any better thats for sure
by RQ on Feb 21, 2012 9:31 AM CST up reply actions
Well played.
They were pretty great last year, though.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:16 AM CST up reply actions
OSU > Texas at BB
I think if you factor in Conf titles and the fact that they were serious title contenders the last few years have vaulted them ahead of the Horns. I would guess they will get a 3rd straight sweet 16 appearance this year and will prolly go a step further.
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
I agree
Matta has been a #1 seed twice and #2 seed twice the last 6 years. Rebuilt his team the post-Oden era. 4 Big Ten titles the last 6 years. He hasn’t been on the job as long, but right now the Ohio State program is more elite than Texas.
It takes leadership to win the close games
We don’t have enough of it on the floor.
We ARE The Joneses™ - Burnt Orange Nation
Follow @TXStampede
Mental game
Listening to Bobby Knight point out all the stupid mistakes makes losing close games that much more painful. What makes these guys so dumb? Sure, we’ve got a lot of freshmen but even our seniors play dumb basketball. J’Covan Brown may be the smartest player we’ve had, so why doesn’t that rub off?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
The most frustrating part year in and year out recently....
is the disappointment that keeps occuring down the stretch and in March…….and now we annually sit and wait for key players to leave. I hope Brown and Kabongo return, but given our track record of late…I’m prepared for them to bail. I firmly believe Barnes coaching style needs a team to gel over a two year period, and unfortunately that just isn’t happening with all the turnover.
I have never seen a team not be able to recognize the 3 pt shooters and close out on them as poorly as this team does.
It is no coincidence this team allows nearly every opponent to shoot the 3 at a very high percentage. I don’t understand how you allow Heslip to get that open for his shots, especially when he’s relying on other players to get him open shots. Page has some ability to create his own shot and why we didn’t go box and 1 on OSU I do not know. The defensive rotations are terrible, the inability by the bigs to hedge the screens are killing us on pick and roll. Jackson’s big 3 to put BU up 59-57 came off a high screen from a big and Wangmene was no where close to giving Myck any help. I had to rewind it to see where Alexii was (btw he was in the paint).
Barnes’ last 3 timeouts he called resulted in zero positive plays. The first was the JCB post up play coming out of a time-out. Poor execution to say the least on the entry pass by Kabongo, but why are we going to something we haven’t gone to all game. Second time out was the Kabongo reach around foul. Not on Barnes, but what the heck were you thinking Myck? Even if you get all ball on the reach around, 9 times out of 10 they call the fall on the basis that you are reaching in. Last time out, down 75-72 and Baylor is inbounding the ball beneath its basket with 5 seconds remaining and Barnes does not put a man on the passer. Did he not learn anything from the Arizona game last year? So much easier to make an on target pass without being harassed.
Also heard Barnes post game comments this morning and at least he keeps it real. Basically said he didn’t call timeout before the JCB turnover because if Baylor switches up its defense, team would have been lost and run the wrong play anyway. I would love to see this kind of honesty from Mack.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
To be fair,
Baylor’s last two timeouts resulted in negative plays for them as well.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:19 AM CST up reply actions
Ironic
The only 2 turnovers in the 2nd half for Baylor came after timeouts.
Is it like rain on your wedding day?
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 1:37 PM CST up reply actions
Barnes' recruiting and player development left the cupboard bare this year
Sure, he may be doing a good job of coaching the players he has, but he also should take the blame that the players he has are not good enough to compete for a Big12 title and may not even be good enough to slide into the Dance.
He missed on Chapman; He missed on Lexi – those 2 misses are killing us this year
Something went wrong with Varez Ward and Shawn Wiliams; Jai Lucas was a wasted schollie; Matt Hill was a miss; There have been other 4-5 years players come through who were decent but noticeable limited like Balbay and Gary Johnson (the most highly praised, yet offensively inefficient Longhorn I can ever remember).
When you have that many “misses”, you have to keep your “hits” around longer. Barnes hasn’t.
Fair point
Barnes has to recruit better around the margins, which is one reason I’m so pleased with this class, as well as next year’s.
76-37-5. Now GTFO.
Yes,
it’s been quite apparent for Baylor this year that their success has had at least as much if not more to do with the ‘marginal’ prospects like Pierre Jackson and Brady Heslip than it has with the elite talent in Quincy Miller.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
Give Baylor Some Credit
They exploited a less talented, less experienced team on the road. They are ranked for a reason, we are not ranked for a reason.
Games like this are dlsappointing. If you get blown out by 20 at home you don’t get this sort of a reaction. It’s when you lose all those games by six or less that it’s painful.
Think about this: We are playing six freshmen and rely on rebounding from Wangmene and Chapman and we are three plays per game away from being something like 25-3. Three plays per game. This particular loss we played lousy second half defense and had zero positive inside presence. That will change next year.
I like this team a lot. Sure they make a lot of freshman mistakes but they are growing up before your eyes and they’re a lot better team than I thought they’d be before the season started and I give Barnes credit that we’re even having these discussions. He’s done a great job with the talent we have this year and with the infusion of quality bigs next year we’ll be back in the top 25 with a chance for a run in the big dance.
So just chill already. It’s admirable that we even have a shot at the tourney this year.
"One player was lost because he broke his nose. How do you go about getting a nose in condition for football?" -- Darrell K Royal, when asked if the abnormal number of Longhorn injuries that season resulted from poor physical conditioning
by SpiritOfTheFedora on Feb 21, 2012 9:55 AM CST reply actions
Given that UT has gone through something resembling rebuilding years in football and basketball,
which do you think will experience more success in 2012-2013?
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 10:16 AM CST reply actions
Lol..going out on a limb there.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
Too Harsh on Myck BON
I guess I long for the old days when you counted on a freshman PG to be, lemme see – a freshman PG. He made freshman mistakes. I get that. I am more disappointed in guys that have been in the program for years, show no consistency, and disappear in big situations. And Rick is not immune from criticism. I won’t go overboard, but the fact the team offensive chemistry has not become more consistent over the season, and that there continues to be long periods of just ugly, stagnant offensive basketball is on Rick.
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
by realmccoy on Feb 21, 2012 10:47 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Get real bro
This isnt football, there are plenty of kids capable of going into the NBA right out of HS. Look at Kentuckys freshmen the past couple of years. John Wall, Anthony Davis, Terrence Jones, to name a few. For the past couple of years, most of Kentuckys lineup has been freshmen and they’ve made it past the first 3 rounds of the tounrament
Don't Get Your Logic
John Wall was an NBA ready player that had to wait to go to the NBA. Myck Kobongo is a guard who is physically talented that is not mentally ready to play at that level. He is the best PG we got, but he is no John Wall. Why would anyone expect Myck to suddenly play like a Chris Paul or a John Wall?
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
There's a reason Myck was the last 5 star recruit by Rivals
He simply was not ready to play the point at the level he was expected to. If he comes back next year he can work himself into the lottery, and show his true potential. John Wall is an exception. Few freshmen can do what he did, what he or Rose did or dominate like Durant did.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
Well there has been a fairly lengthy list of one and done PG's in the last few years
Rose, Tyreke Evans, John Wall, Brandon Knight, Jrue Holiday, Brandon Jennings, Eric Bledsoe, and would imagine Austin Rivers to join that group this year. If Willie Warren would have left after his freshman season at OU he would have a better draft status. So with that said I don’t think its unreasonable to expect a freshman PG to play at a high level.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
Even Colin feels our pain.
“College basketball is like an apartment complex. No one wants to stay there & anyone with talent is gone after 12 months.” – @ESPN_Colin
I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I am a college football fan.
I feel like the recent trend provides a counter-example.
Jared Sullinger, Perry Jones III…
It sounds like LeBryan Nash is going to stay at OkSt next year.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 11:28 AM CST up reply actions
I think the lockout had a lot to do with that last year.
It may have helped convince those guys to stay. And with those guys staying the class was thin, which pushed non-lottery picks like Joseph and Hamilton because their stock would probably never be higher. Unfortunate for Texas, but that’s how it worked out.
It sure would’ve been nice if the NBA locked out after KD’s freshman year, giving him another possible reason to stay.
I agree with that.
Except the Durant part. =)
I’m sure Kentucky is going to see a crazy exodus, but I also think some players are going to see how loaded the class is and also note how much guys like Thomas Robinson helped their draft stock and decide to stick around. I had assumed Nash was a goner, but OkSt fans are convinced he’s staying. Given their recruiting class, they should be pretty good next year if he stays.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 12:00 PM CST up reply actions
I think they had very good reasons to be, especially with Joseph.
Hey, I was convinced that RG3 was staying at Baylor next year, too…and then he won the Heisman. Circumstances change. You can only project based on available information.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
Robinson isn't a good example here
he only averaged about 12 minutes a game last year
I think that it's fairly clear he developed as a player over that time, though.
OurDailyBears.com
by Prashanth Francis on Feb 21, 2012 1:37 PM CST up reply actions
my point was
he hardly played. scouts barely saw him. he wasn’t an NBA prospect
so...
based on his NBA potential, the chances that Myck is gone are good. don’t think an NBA team will let him sneak out of the first round. that said, i still think we have a great team next year since j’covan should come back, mclellan will be a better fit in the system and our bigs wind up being a step up from what we have now. i can see lewis filling the varez ward/kenton paulino role. a solid PG who understands the game but doesn’t have the athleticism to be a superstar.
i think if we beat tech and OU, play close against kansas and win 1 game in the big 12 tourney, we’re in. know why? “Texas” and a 14 appearance streak. as much as they don’t admit it, that kind of stuff plays into decisions.
our opening round opponent in the big 12 tourney likely will be Baylor....
I guess we’re hoping 3rd time will be the charm.
No
With only ten teams now, the top 2 get byes.
Actually, the way it’s setup, the top 6 get byes. 8/9 and 7/10 play the first day. Then it’s 4 vs 5, 1 vs 8/9, 2 vs 7/10, 3 vs 6.
bracket link
yep...Baylor the #3 and Texas the #6 is likely...
which means we get a shot at redemption…albeit the last game of the first day….9pm tip I bet.
Deja Vu, Sort Of...
Eleven months ago, I wrote about the annual rite of assessing Rick Barnes under a high-powered microscope.
After reading the comments on this thread, I am reluctant to come out on either side of the argument as I feel that the real truth about Rick Barnes as a coach is not quite as good as his fans would suggest nor is it as horrible as his detractors may say.
Last year, one of my big concerns is the standard that we hold Rick to. I don’t feel as if we should have any lower expectations than we do for our football or baseball coaches but assessing the job he’s done is something that’s difficult.
I feel as if in the limited amount that I’ve gotten to see the Horns this year that they have a bit more of an offensive plan but it still doesn’t look great. If JCB isn’t dominating (and even when he is) who else is going to provide the offensive spark? Last night, I longed for the days when we averaged 90+ points a game. If we aren’t going to play sound defense, then we may as well go back to that. I don’t know if it’s fair to say that the players on the defensive end look “lazy” because that would imply that I know what their expended effort or desire is. I think that they look slow and there is a lack of intensity; that is probably more fair.
Regarding personnel, there are two really good points made in this thread that I feel are so true:
1) The misses in recruiting have really hurt as much as (if not more than) the one-and-dones. Clint Chapman and Wangmene don’t look like they’ve been here for five years. They certainly don’t play like it. When guys drive to the hoop and there’s no inside domination on defense, then you are really giving up high percentage buckets to guys who have no business being in the paint. Last night, I was dreaming of what a Damion James might have brought to the defense. Heck, I would have settled for Panama Myers! Lexi Wangmene is averaging UNDER 5 points and 5 boards a game. He has LESS than a block per game. If he’s not scoring, blocking or rebounding then what the HELL is he bringing to this team?
2)The one and dones. I know that the reality of college basketball today is that you get the very top players for a year, perhaps two at the most. What is it about the Texas program though that makes it a veritable turnstyle over the last 5-7 years? We really could have used PJ Tucker the year after he left. I’m sure the Ukrainian League worships him but we needed better rebounding. TJ, DJ and most recently Tristan Thompson and Cory Joseph. I was amazed that Hamilton even came back for a second year but perhaps that was because he stunk it up so bad as a freshman he had no choice. Is a year with Rick Barnes what’s driving these guys to the NBA?
For my liking, I still wonder if Rick Barnes is good as some of you say he is. He has these great recruiting classes that don’t seem to translate into “deep in the tournament” success. I’m not sure what the excuse is this year. There always seems to be one. I will offer that he was due for a real down year (i.e., no NCAA tournament) and perhaps it shouldn’t be a surprise that he has it this year. I think that even in down years, you can see discipline or the suggestion of improving discipline to make you think that the coach is working some of his magic into molding these players. On the other hand, could it be that his players really are this dumb and disorganized? Unmotivated or seemingly so? If it’s on the players then at what point is the man who’s recruited and coached them held accountable?
That’s just my .02.
PJ Tucker
He was the first to leave but I forgot to mention that he did leave after his junior year due to grades. This was just to illustrate the point that we seem to miss the talent as soon as it leaves (e.g., rebounds the year after Tucker, PG play after TJ left, etc).
If you really want Barnes first early entries
You need to go back to guys like Chris Mihm and Maurice Evans.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
I don't know what Barnes relationship is with his former players
but he said last night he had just talked with Cory Joseph about NBA life. I’ve also heard from AJ Abrams that Avery Bradley and Dexter Pittman were both unhappy with Barnes because he didn’t call to congratulate them on getting drafted. So take that for what it is.
I do know a lot of them come back to play here during the summer and Royal Ivey and Chris Mihm were working with team at the beginning of the season. I would imagine him to be like a father who’s tough on you but once you’re out from under his roof you see he did it out of love.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
FWIW
I sat on an airplane next to Gabe Monwecki (sorry sic) for a couple hours. He supposedly was recruited by Penders and the played for Barnes. He has basically played all over the world for a bunch of teams and just wouldn’t shut up about how good of coach Rick Barnes is. Best he ever played for by far.
Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen
my feeling is that maybe
this offense is just too complicated. too many plays (too much detail) to learn. keep it freakin’ simple. spread the floor. take advantage of match-ups. take advantage of your players’ natural talents and instincts.
that doesn’t help with all the mental lapses on defense, though. (not really excusable for 5th year seniors) but yeah, uh, freshmen.
Targetting Opponents in Foul Trouble
I love me some Rick Barnes, but it has frustrated me this season and in the past when I see opposing players get into foul trouble early and yet continue to contribute without fouling out. Every time I see a player like Heslip or Jackson pick up a fourth foul I’m like, “Alright, go after that guy when we are omn offense and foul him out or get an easy bucket.” But it never seems to happen for Rick’s teams.
Barnes talked about this in his post game comments.
Saying that the guys have to know game situations, who is in foul trouble, when to foul and who to get a hand up on defense. It left me wondering however is he reiterating these things during breaks in play and in time-outs?
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
who knows?
Heslip & Jackson had 4 fouls each with 8.32 left in the game. (they both sat for a few minutes, but as soon as their in the game, you attack them). yeah, it may seem obvious to a coach of 30 years, but maybe not to freshmen in the heat of a game? from all Barnes’ comments, it sounds like guys just do not do what they’re supposed to—- he said they “hear” but they don’t “listen”. i think that puts both parties at fault.
for players – don’t you freaking want to win???? do what your coach tells you. for coaches, it’s your job to teach them what they clearly have trouble with. but with so little depth on such a young team, you don’t have the option to sit guys that aren’t getting it. you have no choice but to play them.
That was my biggest problem with the game
I don’t think its all on the players. Barnes uses them as an excuse whenever anything goes wrong. They are freshmen so the excuse is more valid than in other years.
My problem was that J’Covan got to the FT line 1 time the entire game. And that was on a potential 4 point play. That’s it! He needs to be way more aggressive with the ball. There is no excuse for it. But I do think its the coaches’ job to make his players understand what they need to do.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
by Mclovin1035 on Feb 22, 2012 12:41 AM CST up reply actions
i gather that his ankle was actually pretty sketchy all game
and that’s why he didn’t attack with his lethal spin move?
it was mentioned at some point during coverage that they were working on his ankle pre-game
In practice, this is actually a really hard thing to do...
How do you target guys in foul trouble? In the NBA, they run some sort of isolation set. The problem is, how many of the Longhorns (or anyone in college really) do you want to run isolations for? How many bad possessions on offense is it worth to get a guy deeper into foul trouble?
I don’t have an answer to this question, but it is what I think about. On a straight iso, what is the expected points per possession going to look like for a team like Texas?
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Or another way of thinking about it...
how many college teams actually are effective at targeting guys in foul trouble? I can’t answer this, but I would imagine it is a really low number.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
but they are guards that have to guard your guards
your guards handle the ball. the point is not necessarily to TRY to foul them out. the point is that you challenge because either they WILL foul out, or they will have to ease up on defense – giving you the advantage.
Barnes is in Mack Phase circa 2005-2010
He is complacent and drawing a very healthy paycheck. However, at least Mack brought us BCS wins and a NC. The epic collapse was caused by underlying problems with how things were run inside the program. I think the same thing is happening with Barnes.
Barnes has underperformed with more imho. I’m honestly tired of the “young” excuse. You don’t see other top programs (losing just as many, if not more players) coming back strong every year. As to Barnes’ post game “throwing his players under the bus” comments…does he not realize it is HIS job to have them ready. The blame goes to the coach as well.
If Barnes stays, things need to change and he should be in a hot seat. Making the tourney numerous times means nothing when we don’t get to the Sweet 16 on a regular basis with killer recruiting classes. Heck, I’d take getting past the first round everytime we make it but that hasn’t happened either.
Just going to throw out some random thoughts to see what sticks
1. I am a pretty solid defender of Barnes. Maybe even an apologist, who knows.
I see his faults, I think, pretty clearly though. Get guys to box out, for crying out loud. It isn’t that hard. If any one flaw of Barnes’ style has cost Texas wins this year, it is probably not boxing out.
2. But anyway, here is the question I always come back to:
What do you expect out of Texas basketball, or any other team you root for?
If your answer is, “championships, God dammit, and nothing else is acceptable,” then you are probably pretty dissatisfied with Barnes. But I have news for you, you are probably setting your self up for some serious disappointment with this attitude. For your own mental health, I hope you don’t apply this sort of thinking broadly across all aspects of your life. Sometimes things go your way, and other things don’t.
I grew up a fan of the Cleveland Browns, and spent my teenage years in Buffalo, NY during the Bills’ super bowl appearances. I think this explains a lot about my attitudes as a sports fan.
I know some of you want “higher standards and accountability,” but how are you actually going to achieve that? If Rick Barnes ends up with a record similar to Lefty Driesell, is that good enough? Or not?
3. There are only just so many championships to go around. In each year, maybe there are 5 teams with a really good chance to get a championship. Coach K, one of the all time greats, builds championship caliber teams nearly every season, and has 5 in 31 seasons.
My feeling is that Barnes has built maybe 3 or 4 championship caliber teams in his 14 seasons at Texas. It might take several more championship caliber teams before he finally gets his championship.
So if you want to replace Barnes to give yourself a better shot to win championships, you need to find a guy who will be able to build championship caliber teams at a higher rate than Barnes. You need someone who will build them 1 out of every 2 or 3 years, rather than 1 out of approximately every 4 years, like Barnes has.
Who is that guy, and how will you find him? Really good and smart programs mess this up all the time. Is Tom Crean that guy for Indiana? Was Roy Williams that guy at Kansas? (Yes, but he never could quite catch a break.) Will Sean Miller do it at Arizona? We know how Billy Clyde did at Kentucky.
4. Up thread, someone brought up Notre Dame. They kind of ran Digger Phelps out of town 20 years ago, and and the program didn’t sniff the NCAA tournament for a decade. Mike Brey has them competing again, although his track record has a lot more in common with Tom Penders than it does with Rick Barnes.
Texas’ current success in basketball is far more tenuous than many of you believe? What puts Texas in better position going forward than Notre Dame, other than the presence of Rick Barnes. Does a Texas program in 2013 minus Barnes look in better position than Notre Dame did in 1991?
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Good post Reggieball.
I think mainly as a fan of Texas my expectations are part process oriented and part results oriented:
1) I expect Rick to revisit our recruiting and player retention philosophies so that Texas Basketball has more stability year-to-year. More players sticking around. More players that I can latch onto and follow through their career. It’s not fun for a fan when the roster turns over 80-100% of its starters every year.
2) Similarly, I expect the constant re-evaluation of staff and processes. The Utah Jazz offensive switch is a welcome move, but something tells me Barnes hasn’t recruited the right players to run that style of offense. It seems like you would need a well-rounded player at the high post who can pass, shoot, and dribble, and I don’t see that on the roster (maybe Holmes becomes that guy). I’m also not sold on Barnes’ surrounding staff (which is enormous based on the number of suits I see standing on the court during timeouts) , Todd Wright excepted, although I can say I haven’t been impressed with the physical development of Chapman, Hill, and Pittman.
3) I expect us to compete for Big12 Titles every year. I think that’s a fair expectation given our resources.
Some agreement, some disagreement
I respect where you are coming from.
1) From the “fun for fans” perspective, 4 year guys that you get attached to is probably better than one and dones. I don’t know if this maximizes wins or not, but it would be more fun. Probably a mix of upperclassmen and one/two and dones is the way to go if you want to max out wins.
2) I basically agree, although it is hard to say anything bad about the work Wright did with Pittman. Also, the Texas program turned Hill into a much better defender than people gave credit for. Hill would be a huge addition to this team, if he still had eligibility left, as in my view interior defense and rebounding presence is this teams biggest problem.
3) In the Big 12, we have a 1000 lb gorilla named Kansas who is a top 5 team nationally even in “down” years like this one.
And I don’t think resources matter very much in basketball. At least financial ones. With a few good players and a good coach, you can build a program out of nothing. College basketball is a sport where tiny private schools (Duke, Georgetown, Villanova) compete head to head with giant state schools, and often win.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
assisstant coaching
Wright excepted, that’s something to look at i think. Like, we really need a great post coach – which might entail getting a guy who was a great post man (as opposed to : didn’t accomplish much in the post in his career). i think a great post player would also have better recruiting instincts.
i think Danny Manning is a big part of Kansas’ success
Lammert is the guy to run the pick n roll with. they changed offenses, and now they’re recruiting the players to make it work (i hope!). doesn’t happen overnight
big man coach
Barnes could use an assistant who works with big men, preferably a former NBA player. Is Chris Mihm free?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
I heard Olajuwan has been working with Dwight Howard
Maybe our guys should spend the summer in Houston.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. If they get mad, you're a mile away AND you have their shoes.
You bring up a lot of good points
Notre Dame’s a poor comparison. The better one’s are Ohio State and Florida: two large flagship schools in large states with unlimited resources and top 10 football programs.
What’s a championship caliber-team? Top 2 seed, top 4 seed? Final Four team?
Matta’s been a top 2 seed 4 times in his 7 years at Ohio State (and is headed towards a 5th this season). He’s been a top 4 seed those same 4 times. He’s won the Big Ten 4 times, the Big Ten Tournament 3 times, and played in the Big Ten Tournament Final 5 times. He has 1 Final Four, 1 national title appearance, and an NIT Championship.
Donovan’s been a top 2 seed 3 times in his 15 years at Florida. He’s been a top 4 seed 6 times (and is probably headed towards a 7th this season). He’s won the SEC 4 times, the SEC Tournament 3 times, and played in the SEC Tournament Final 5 times. He has 3 Final Fours, 3 national title appearances, and 2 championships.
Barnes has been a top 2 seed 3 times in his 15 years at Texas. He’s been a top 4 seed 6 times. He’s won the Big 12 3 times. He’s never won the Big 12 Tournament despite 6 appearances in the final. He has 1 Final Four.
Donovan’s career is odd. Nothing sticks out as that much different from Barnes other than the 2 national championships (which is BIG mind you). Other than that, you’re looking at similar numbers. That being said, those were Donovan’s recruits and he coached them up.
Matta looks like he’s building something special at Ohio State. Other than the fact Ohio State has a little bit more basketball history than Texas, why can’t Texas expect something similar? Not the exact same, but similar.
We will see about Ohio State
If Matta doesn’t win a championship soon, the Ohio State fan base will start viewing him as Texas fans view Barnes (and as Florida fans used to view Donovan).
My definition of a championship caliber team is a team that ends the season with an SRS of about 20 or greater. 20 is not a hard line of course, it could be 18 or 19. But somewhere in there is historically what most championship teams have. More info on why I use this is here and here.
Barnes has 3 teams with an SRS greater than a 20, and 4 other teams that had more than 18.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
I think Texas an Ohio State are pretty close as programs
Maybe Ohio State is better if you only include the last 5 years, because this time scale excludes some of Barnes’ best teams. If you look out over the last decade, I think Texas probably looks about the same (maybe a little better).
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
In half the time
Matta has more conference titles, more top 2 seeds, more conference tournament championships, and more national title appearances than Barnes.
I’ll acknowledge this is somewhat unfair to Barnes as Ohio State could fall off a cliff the next half-decade or so. But if the goal is to consistently build championship caliber teams, Matta seems to have done a damn good job of that even using your criteria: He has 3 teams with an SRS greater than 21 and 4 greater than 19 (again in half the time).
I don't disagree
Matta is doing nice work at OSU. I don’t have a problem saying that OSU is in a better position than Texas is in, and Matta has gotten there faster than Barnes.
But I don’t think the gap is that large. Certainly not large enough to call for Barnes’ head.
How does Texas stack up against the 30 or so other “football schools” not named Ohio State or Florida? Want to switch programs with any of those? I like the Michigan coach, because I used to go to his basketball camp back in the day. Alabama has decent basketball teams, but they aren’t even in Texas’ stratosphere right now. LSU? Georgia? If football schools with lots of financial resources are who we should be measuring the Texas program against, I think Texas comes out looking pretty good.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
FWIW
I’m not saying Barnes should be fired. I am stating Texas fans have a right to expect more. There’s more upside in the Texas program than has been shown with Barnes.
Georgia should probably be in that group as well, Michigan also. I would disagree with LSU and Alabama. They aren’t going to spend the money on hoops or great coaches. I feel Georgia and Michigan could spend that money.
Alabama and LSU are kind of interesting. Alabama recruits quite well and LSU has fielded some really strong teams.
You are right that they are unlikely to make a big coaching hire.
Arkansas is probably a better comparison.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Donovan has 6 teams with an SRS greater than 20
Which brings up something interesting. The one thing where Barnes has been clearly better is in terms of consistency—everyone of his teams have been to the tournament Donovan only has one other team over 17. He’s either had something special or hasn’t put it together. Matta missed the tournament also over the last 6 years.
What do you value more, the consistency Barnes has brought to the table—always in tournament, usually with a seed in the 3-7 range or do you want what Donovan has brought to the table—some frustrating non-tournament seasons, with some all-time great teams/championships as well.
Well, I would of course take the championships...
Flags fly forever, and all of that. (Well, not always in the NCAA.)
But I don’t think you get that choice. Not in actual practice.
I always come back to making that list of coaches who are measurably better than Rick Barnes. It is a short list. Many of the guys on it are pretty old, with more time to win games and championships.
I think that Barnes career going forward most likely will fall somewhere in the range between Lefty Driesell and Jim Calhoun. Driesell was an outstanding coach who never won it all, and Calhoun was late to get his first championship, but then went on a fantastic run. I think it is unlikely for Barnes to reach the Calhoun level, but also think he will end up with a better career than Driesell. When Driesell is what we consider to be the “downside case,” that tells me there is a lot of upside.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Would Thad Matta
have been on that list when he was at Xavier? Probably not. There are a lot of very good coaches out there who don’t get an opportunity like Texas. Doesn’t mean they couldn’t do it if given the chance.
I think Barnes is a good coach, but I would guess there are 10+ “obtainable” coaches that could do a better job with the resources available. Is it worth firing Barnes to find out? Don’t know, but again there’s more upside in this program than Barnes fans seem to want to admit.
No he wouldn't...
but how do you find these guys, knowing that at most out of the hundreds of coaches available, there are only a few that are likely to be better than Barnes?
This is what I think is the crapshoot. We have a certain expectation level with Barnes. The odds are high that changing coaches would lead to worse results.
Don’t believe me? For every Thad Matta, how many Billy Gilespies are there? You might get a guy who will be somewhat (say 5-10% better) than Barnes (which is probably how I view Matta, given what we know and don’t know about him), a guy who is similar, a guy a bit worse (Mike Brey level teams), or a guy who will completely sink your program. If you think the odds are good that you will get a Matta type, then how come so many institutions with similar situations to Texas mess this up so often. Iowa grabbed the Butler coach who followed Matta. Didn’t work out. Sean Miller looks good so far at Arizona (he followed Matta at X), but will he really achieve Matta’s level of success?
This is where I think the Notre Dame analogy is a good one. They ran off Digger Phelps in exactly the same what that some would like to run off Barnes.
Thad Matta is probably an outlier, and hoping to hit big on one is not a good strategy. Odds of a championship seem better to me if we wait Barnes out.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Play it out
Worse case scenario: you hire the wrong guy like Kentucky did with Gillespie, you let him go and try it again—this time with Calipari. Or UNC with Williams.
And frankly it’s Dodds job to interview and find the someone who can take Texas basketball to greater levels.
The one thing to remember is that Barnes is the 1st coach in the history of the Texas program to get the full benefits of being in a BCS type basketball conference with a strong football program. The SWC was C-USA when it came to hoops and Penders was at the tail end of his career when Texas joined the Big XII. Maybe it’s just me, but I firmly believe a special coach could do special things at Texas in basketball.
Kentucky has more of a safety net then Texas
Again, I think we are more like Notre Dame when it comes to basketball, than we are like Kentucky. A single bad hire isn’t quite as big of a setback for a name school like UNC or Kentucky as it is for someone like Texas. Just my take.
If you don’t like the Notre Dame/Digger example, look at the post Fisher period at Michigan (I know he was pushed out for some additional reasons). 1 NCAA tournament appearance in a decade.
How has the post Mike Davis period worked for Indiana?
Or post Nolan Richardson Arkansas?
Louisville did OK with the switch from Crum to Pitino. But Pitino is not normally who you get a shot at.
And these are just examples of programs where there was a huge drop off after the coach was run off. If we look at programs where guys retired or moved on to the NBA, we find some other similar cases. St. Johns has never been the same since Lou retired. Seton Hall has hardly seen the tournament since PJ left. With time, I could make a very long list of these sorts of schools.
These programs have much more in common with Texas than do UNC and Kentucky.
We will never know, but Calipari probably wouldn’t have left Memphis for Texas. He was not an up and comer either. It was simply a case of Kentucky being able to go out and hire who they wanted, like it was when they got Pitino, or when UNC got Williams and Kansas hired Self. These guys were all established with long track records of success.
I agree that being in a major conference is the true structural advantage in college basketball. It isn’t financial advantages like in football; a D-I basketball program is no where near as expensive to run.
I am not one of the guys who thinks being a football school hurts, mind you, but I don’t think the cash cow that is Texas football is much of an asset either. It just doesn’t matter.
It is hard to compare Barnes with other coaches in Texas history, because he does have advantages that his predecessors did not. The biggest one may be that Texas high school basketball is no longer the stinking cesspool that it once was.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Good point re: Kentucky and UNC. As a blue-blood program, there is more resilience with those programs.
There are bad hires and then there is the Kelvin Sampson mess. I don’t think that’s a good example. Fisher at Michigan is a good example. And one of the differences between Michigan and UNC/UK is that the latter dump underachievers. Gillespie lasted 2 years, Dougherty 3. Michigan let Ellerbe hang around for 5 and Amaker for 7.
I don’t like comparing the old Catholic schools of the Northeast like St. John’s and Seton Hall. They are completely different structurally and what most people forget is that the landscape of college basketball is dramatically different that it was even 15-20 years ago. NC State fans still can’t understand why they can’t compete with UNC and Duke. Well, guess what, it’s not 1985 anymore. The exposure of the tournament has turned the game into a national affair and NC State doesn’t have that brand.
In short, you are correct that there are examples of name brand programs falling short on the hardwood. There are also name-brand programs that aren’t blue-bloods that have better track records than Texas.
I think the money helps in the sense that if Texas wanted to offer a hoops coach $5 million, they could do that without breaking a sweat (financially they can do it—I understand there may be issues within the athletic department on a political level). Can these smaller state schools that spend a ton of money on football, the SEC West for instance, afford to do that?
You bring up Calipari, who for my money is the best college coach around (recruiting and coaching). I don’t know if he makes that move to Texas, but money is money. He’s coached three different programs and all three have made it to the Final Four.
I think ultimately it depends on what side of the fence you fall on here. Do you think Barnes gets to a point where 40% of his teams are championship caliber? Or do you believe that only someone else can extract that value from the Texas basketball program?
My question for you and the Barnes supporters is, at what point do you pull the plug? What has to happen for Barnes to lose your support (outside of major violations or something like that)?
I pull the plug on Barnes...
with major violations or something like that. Something that embarrasses the university.
And that is about it. Maybe a serious drop off in performance, but that isn’t what we are talking about. If he sustains where he is at presently, I want him to retire from Texas.
I don’t think that churning through coaches really fast until you find “the one” is a reasonable way to proceed. In the business world, this is what they say is not a “sustainable model.” Let’s imagine that Michigan had adopted this philosophy, and had found their guy (we will assume someone with Beilein’s success is there guy) after 2 changes in 6 years. They seem pretty happy with a guy like John Beilein after churning through several coaches. Now, here is the question:
Do you think Beilein will have more success at Michigan that Texas has had/will have under Barnes? Beilein is the type of guy you might end up with after you churn through several coaches. Or should Michigan fire Beilein (it has been 5 years after all and his teams have hardly done anything in the tournament)?
(And I really like Beilein.)
Churning faster, giving coaches something like 3 years to perform, is definately not a model I want. It will hurt the program, more than likely. Who wants to be the Oakland Raiders of NCAA basketball, and who wants to play or coach there? How much turnover at the coaching spot can a successful NCAA program have?
My point on these old examples is that 1980s St Johns may not apply to today’s Texas basketball in a specific sense, but success for an NCAA basketball program is very coach driven. Don’t get the right coach, you won’t succeed. Even for Blue Bloods. And the right coach can be really hard to find/get if you aren’t a Blue Bloods. When you already have a good one, upgrades seem really rare.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
40%?
But stated above, if we use 18+ SRS as the number for championship caliber, then Barnes is currently at 50% for his career at Texas, with the most recent one being last year.
Since 1986
only 2 teams with an SRS less than 18 have won the tournament: Kansas 1988 and UConn 2011. And only 1 other team less than 20 has won it: Syracuse 2003. I think 20 is the much better number to use.
That being said, SRS believes the better Texas team was 2000’s (seeded 5th) and out in the 2nd round than 2003’s (seeded 1st) and in the Final Four.
I would use the measure of top 2 or top 3 seeds. Almost all of the national champions since the tournament expanded come from that subset.
As aPart of me still prefers seeding: A top 2 seed is a championship-caliber team
The thing is
The last 5 years is college basketball in its current state. Since then the 1 and done rule has totally altered the entire landscape. While I’m glad Rick has gotten us so far as a team and built our program, I’m just wondering that maybe he’s lost his touch from earlier in his career. Partially because of the changing landscape of basketball, which is why I’d weight recent history more ( as well as the fact that the past 4 or 5 seasons directly can relate to this year, like Chappy and Wangmene being from 07-08)
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
Interesting points
1. I agree with, though our biggest problem is late game offense and execution( from the drawing board to the court)
2. The 2nd weekend of the tournament at least 2 times every 4 years. Of which I would like at least one run further than the sweet 16 during that time. I would be satisfied with this, though obviously I want championships.
3.I disagree with him putting us in position to win a title, he has done it 3 times( 02-03, 05-06, 07-08) but hasn’t had us close the last 4 seasons. I find this unacceptable we should be making it to the Sweet 16 at least once every 4 years. The best coaches do that at the very least. I think Buzz williams or Shaka Smart could accomplish just this, albeit the transition year may be painful but I think either of them would be able to deliver more Sweet 16’s than what Barnes is doing right now. Look at our past 4 seedings ( assuming we are a 12/13/NIT this year). We are not at the magical 2/1 threshold that has the serious title contenders. We have clearly not been a top 15 program the past 4 seasons, we were a 7,8,4 and ?. That is not top 15, that may not even be top 20.
Perhaps Barnes is a “Victim of his own success”. He led us to a final 4 in 03, but not enough since. After 2 Elite 8’s in 3 seasons, we grew to expect it. Maybe that’s our problem. But I do think we are Texas though and expecting to compete for titles should always be our mentality.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
funny
Ksu beat mizzou tonight on the road and might slip into the top 25 now.
if KSU stays in the top 25 at selection sunday time then we would then have our sole signature win against a top 25 team.
Funny to be hoping for KSU to win out
by jtdoes on Feb 21, 2012 8:02 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Good Point...we need to cheer for Kansas State & Temple...
if they keep winning, both could turn into quality wins on our resume in the next 2 weeks.
Also, we know Texas has little chance to win at Kansas……the Jayhawks would have to be asleep at the wheel for us to have a shot. Well, that may just happen if they lock up the Big 12 crown and #1 seed prior to the last game of the season against Texas. If Kansas beats Mizzou at home this weekend, that could very well happen.
just sayin….
Speaking of KSU.....
With all the talk on this post about national titles and conference titles, what is more frustrating to me is how we have been getting routinely bounced by the KSU’s (“We Own Texas”) and Baylors of the world over the last few years.
every dog has its day
Its just that for KSU against us it has been going for about 10 yrs
by jtdoes on Feb 21, 2012 10:12 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
What I don't understand
is why so many folks are expecting more from this team. Our best returning player wasn’t even a full-time starter last year. Our other two returnees were foul-prone big men with limited skills and insufficient PT to help improve those skills. Everyone else is a freshman, and the one player who was billed as a Top-15 one-n-done game-changer (Kabongo) should in retrospect probably instead be ranked somewhere like 25-to-35 in his class, having given a performance so far in roughly the same stratosphere as McClellan rather than a level above.
So let’s recap: no experience, no depth and no superstars. For virtually every NCAA program, that spells: NO TOURNEY.
Now, if people want to give Barnes hell for putting the program in this mess, feel free. His refusal to recruit quality four-year players ever since Durantula left is probably the single largest reason this 2012 team is struggling. But pardon me if my eyes roll a bit when people complain that a team full of misfits and unready freshmen can’t win tight games. We should be marveling that they’re competing with experienced and skilled squads like Mizzou and Baylor, if only for 38 minutes at a time.
Really: on paper, this team should suck out loud. And it doesn’t. We should be scrapping for 17 wins and an NIT bid, not the NCAA’s. So while I’m not pleased with Barnes’ roster management, I’ll tip my cap at his job on the hardwood this year. Kabongo’s issues are entirely between his ears, and every other player has been a little better than I expected.
Right there with you
To be honest, going into this season I thought that Texas’ upside was what we are seeing. I didn’t expect to make the tournament with this team.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Chapman
I am very proud of Chapman’s effort this season. But like Manny Diaz tweeted today “Don’t confuse effort with achievement.”
by nojusticenopeaceftp on Feb 21, 2012 11:22 PM CST reply actions
this is entirely subjective
but all these other top tier coaches mentioned here, seem to be better motivators (especially in-game).
i remember from the first few games of the season, that there seemed to be a real lack of intensity during pre-game announcements and the starts of games. Holmes has showed some real intensity in his playing / demeanor – i like that (like i dug JCB’s passion).
Chapman has showed a lot of intensity in games, but he’s limited by his physical gifts
i kinda like the “let’s destroy these motherf***ers” approach. not the “let’s just try to get better each game” approach. if you’re trying to get better, you worry more about making mistakes, and then you make mistakes. if you’re trying to destroy your opposition, you’re gonna play with total intensity
“zip em up” as they used to say at Xavier
by following on Feb 22, 2012 1:16 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Do you think lack of intensity is a problem with this team?
If anything, the problem is lack of experience, talent, and focus. That is my subjective take. Intensity, at least as manifested through physical play, is not lacking. These guys are playing hard. Maybe not always smart, but hard. The defensive breakdowns have been mostly mental, rather than due to a lack of effort. For example, the poor help defense that Knight pointed out during the Baylor game, or Kabongo leaving shooters open.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
i see Focus and Intensity as being very close to the same thing
yes, guys play hard, but the mental lapses kill them (the occasional defensive stupor, really dumb fouls at very bad times, poor decisions on defense), and i see the mental lapses as a lack of sustained focus, where the intensity slips.
clearly, as a team, they haven’t managed to play a full game all year. against Baylor, they played a pretty solid first half, and then got outplayed the 2nd half in a crucially important game.
i can see for the freshmen where a lack of experience can translate into lapses in focus, just because they’re not used to having to play their butts off on both ends of the floor for a sustained 40 minutes (though most are playing less than 30 minutes). but Wangmene leaving guys wide open behind him? poor help defense again and again? When your 5th year guys play like that game after game, something’s lacking.
to some degree, i think focus & intensity can make up for a lack of talent (the Notre Dame argument). Experience on the floor, and with each other, as a team, on the floor, is something you just have to earn (and learn). But focus/intensity will help you learn faster.
Do we have less talent than Iowa St or K St? Heck, do we have less talent than Missouri? or less experience & intensity? (yeah, their post guys are way better than ours, but do you consider Steve Moore a big-time talent or a solid role-player?)
Baylor has ridiculous talent, & much more experience than us, but they lack focus & intensity (see Perry Jones III— Acy being the obvious exception). and i’m sure more than a few people here would put that on their coach.
i was thinking last night, in terms of a coaching culture, that “get your head in the f***in game” is gonna get you a little farther than “what were you thinking?” and maybe that difference between “aggressive” and “passive-aggressive” can translate into that extra oomph that makes a team championship tough.
it seems like through this thread, both “sides” in the coaching debate have sort of dove-tailed. Yes, Barnes is definitely one of the best coaches in the country and he’s built a very solid program here. But maybe he’s missing that little intangible something that would push his team over the top.
Obviously, the make-up of the team this year makes any thought of a championship ridiculous (but it also raises some concerns about recruiting & coaching (especially where the big men are concerned))
Next year will answer a lot of questions. Depending on how many (and which) guys are still around the year after that, it might be enough to say – if we can’t do it with this talent, then there is an issue with coaching that needs to be addressed (unless you’re ok with never playing for a championship).
i can definitely see that some people have already reached their conclusion. And the fact that it’s been 14 years already without a championship game (and with relatively poor showing in the Conference tournament), shouldn’t be swept under the rug of “but we have a top 15 program.” How long can you be satisfied with a top 15 program that never gets to the championship game? I think the next couple of years will (and should) solidify everybody’s opinions.
how that affects the good old boys at the top – who knows? i imagine there’s a LOT more pressure on the football side of things.
There is a lot in that comment...
I can’t address all of it, but there are a lot of interesting things that you have said. I can’t say that I agree with all of it, but who cares, it was interesting.
Talent is a fascinating topic (at least for me). What does it mean to have talent? To focus in more on the topic at hand, what does basketball talent mean? It clearly encompasses a lot of things. Very few players are good at everything in basketball, so everyone has limits to their talent. And it encompasses measurable athletic things (like size, speed, and jumping), less measurable athletic things (like body control), instincts and court awareness, along with a whole host of basketball skills. A rare few guys (like LeBron James) have the whole package. Guys like J’Covan lack the measurable athletic stuff, but have the rest of the package. Others have some of the measurables and not others. Pretty much any combination is possible.
I put this in not because it really addresses your point, but when you are asking which teams are the most talented, you kind of need to consider all of these aspects. But hey, let’s hit the teams:
Iowa State. I don’t know that they are as talented as Texas on the whole, but they are more talented than people give them credit for. Hoiberg has really put something together there. Royce White could (should?) have a longer NBA career than pretty much anyone on the current Texas squad. And a lot of those guys can play. Korie Lucious will be there next year as well, and he is a talented player, too.
K-State. Probably not this year. They are hard to figure out, to be honest, and I haven’t seen them play as much.
Missouri. Across the board more talented than Texas. Who on this Texas team other than J’Covan Brown would start for Missouri?
Baylor. They are as good as anyone when they are defending and not turning the ball over. The problem is they go through these periods where they turn the ball over a lot and don’t defend at a high level. They should can the zone; everytime I have seen them play this season, they play so much better and harder on defense when they are in man-to-man. We pretty clearly saw that Monday night.
How long can you be satisfied with a top 15 program that never gets to the championship game?
How about, forever. Seriously. If you define how you feel about your team in terms of the number of championships that they win, you clearly didn’t grow up rooting for the Indians and the Browns. Top 15 out of 345 isn’t too bad. Texas plays good basketball at a very high level.
And I don’t think we should write off Barnes’ championship chances yet.
But let’s set that aside. Let’s say our plan is in fact to maximize our chance of wining a championship, and we will make whatever coaching move it takes.
If you were in the position to decide, a rational way to decide would be to ask the question, “what coach that is obtainable raises our probability of winning a championship, relative to what it is currently with Rick Barnes?”
I still think our greatest chance of doing this involves keeping Rick Barnes. Whoever you think is the right guy. Or perhaps you are one of those who takes the position that “it is Dodds’ job to know who the right guy; that is what we pay him for.” I don’t buy that argument. No matter how smart or good Dodds is, history suggests that it is very hard to replace a good coach with someone who is better. College basketball is full of programs that have tried, and have failed. Louisville is the only “non-blue blood” success story that I can find.
Someone like Shaka Smart is the flavor of the month (or really, the flavor of last month). Will he recruit well enough to compete in the Big 12? Will his idiosyncratic style of play translate to the Big 12 (probably, if he can get good enough players)? No one knows these things, and it is a pretty big gamble. Honestly, if we are replacing Barnes, I want someone with more of a track record. Someone who has succeeded at more than one place, ideally, but at a minimum someone who has more of a resume than a really good 3 week run.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
And I know...
that you didn’t suggest Shaka Smart (who, by the way, I have nothing against). But I have seen that name slipped into this thread here and there, I think.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
I don't see us as a top 15 program.
The last 4 years including this one ( AKA, when the current seniors have played their careers with Lex,Chappy, and other redshirts being the exceptions)
2008-2009: 7 seed, 2nd round, Unranked
2009-2010: 8 seed, 1st round, unranked
2010-2011: 4 seed, 2nd round, 8
2011-2012: 12/13/NIT, ?, unranked( unless we win out)
Is that a top 15 program to you? I don’t think so
Michigan State
UNC
Dook
Kansas
Kentucky
Butler
UConn
Louisville
West Virginia
Pittsburgh
Ohio State
Syracuse
Arizona
Mizzou
Kstate
Georgetown
Wisconsin
Gonzaga
Have all been better than us over this stretch, there are probably a few more as well but that was off the top of my head. So we are probably in the 20-30 range.
Have we been top 15 over the past decade? I would say so.
If we were a top 15 program, we would’ve made it past the 1st weekend of the tournament in the past 4 years. Or been ranked more than once. Or gotten better seeds. The past 4 years Barnes has not been putting us in a position to win a championship or the final 4 for that matter.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
Last season Texas had a championship caliber team that seemed to run out of gas for whatever reason. In my view, it was among Barnes’ best teams, in a year where the NCAA tournament was winnable. You may disagree, but that is how I see it.
I don’t have the same confidence in my ability to pick out the top 15 programs in a predictive fashion based on 4 seasons worth of data that you apparently have. This is particularly true when you want to weigh tournament results more heavily. This means only a handful of games for each team each year.
You may say, “hey, I am not predicting anything.” But if we are judging Barnes prospects going forward, we are in fact predicting. And I want to use more data for that; I want to look at his whole track record.
And to be honest, 4 years really feels like a selective endpoint that you have chosen to make your argument stronger. What if you instead use the last 5 years? The last 7? The last 10? When your conclusion is so clearly dependant on the endpoint that you use, it isn’t a very robust conclusion.
But I get it. The future is now. It is the era of the “one and done” or some such thing as that. Even though the NBA rule change that people cite as the source of the one and done started 6 years ago, and players have been leaving after one or two years for a fair bit longer than that.
By the way, who is the first “one and done” guy. I am having a hard time thinking of anyone earlier than Lamar Odom, but I am sure he isn’t the first.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
Moses Malone?
didn’t he play one year in jr. high and then go pro?!
+1 on all the elements of talent / athleticism
every player brings a unique blend of ability – the trick is trying to find 5 guys who can play together with good chemistry, while maximizing all of their abilities.
i love JCB, but i’m not sure he would start on Missouri. Matt Pressey’s the only guy he could replace, and he provides them with extra quickness/athleticism that JCB doesn’t have.
my point about Mizzou vs. UT talent (and i should’ve been much more clear) was based more on the idea that – when our freshmen class are juniors/seniors, i think they’d easily stack up as individual athletes/ballers with where Mizzou’s guys are now. (i might be way wrong)
anyway, the future looks pretty bright. we’ll have to wait & see if they can take a rocket all the way to the sun.
ps— if your team can make it to the Final Four, they’ve proven they’re a terrific team who was capable of winning a championship. great to win a championship, but final four is a fantastic accomplishment. there isn’t a program that makes it to the Elite 8 every year (not even to the Sweet 16 – am i right?)
from Smart, i think you get a vibe (or at least i do) that he will eventually prove himself to be a top-notch coach, but it doesn’t look like VCU (or Butler) will make the tourney this year. Buzz Williams and Marquette – yep, with a high seed.
VCU is 2nd in the Colonial Conference
They could win the tournament, and make the NCAA Tourney. Butler also has a chance they started out awfully, but Stevens has helped turn their team around no surprise there. Disagree about J’Covan. He is easily a top 3 guard in the conference right ( with Tyshawn Taylor and Marcus Denmon), but I guess he could come off the bench like he did last season for us. There are programs that make it to the second weekend more often than we have the past few years, and in general the past decade. Then there are some that have made it far less than we have have but have an extra Final 4 or 2. Though I agree if you make the final 4 you are good enough to win a national title, that’s the goal of every team before the season, make the Final 4 and then worry about winning the National Title. Like Omaha is the goal for College baseball teams.
"There's more to it than just winning games" - Rick Barnes
by Mclovin1035 on Feb 24, 2012 12:51 PM CST up reply actions
in some ways JCB is the top guard in the conference
vision, iq, feel. just not sure he’d be a better fit with Flip, Kim, Marcus & Ricardo just purely from a speed/quickness/athleticism perspective (although, hell, JCB might could make em invincible- but i think he would change the way they play). Michael Dixon is also one of the top guards in the conference.
and also, duh, as everyone knows, every year there are teams good enough to win a championship that don’t make it to the Final Four. and vice versa— obviously Connecticut was not the best team in the country last year – but Kemba was the best player at the end of season.
vcu & shaka smart
if they get to the sweet 16, Smart will again be heralded as one of the next great up’n’coming coaches. if they don’t make the tourney, we won’t hear a word about him.
Rec'd for the zip em up line! Why they put a mic in that guy's face I'll never understand.
"If crime was justified by need it would be the occupation of the masses."- Chief Gillespie
PR disaster
Here is a big tip for the Xavier staff. How about not taking a 21 year old guy who was just in a fight and having him talk about it 20 minutes later to the press.
There were some Xavier kids who made “Zip em up” tee shirts, but arena staff wasn’t letting them enter the games with the shirts on.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
one sad thing about that
a month later, Gottlieb and Katz are using the phrase “zip ’em up” on one of their little ESPN bits, and giggling about it. it’s only threatening when black youth talk like that because we’ve been programmed to fear them.
i feel bad for Tu Holloway, that whole situation obviously messed with his mind (and the whole teams’ actually)
I don't know if you are still following this...
But I think the “gansta” line is the one Tu really caught the heat for. I doubt zip em up would have been trouble on its own. And yes, there is a race element in how this was all perceived. Also, our media culture constantly needs something to talk about, and this was a nice thing.
It was blown way out of proportion. Tu wasn’t talking about Vito Corleone. He isn’t a ganster, he is a kid from Nassau County. (OK, so maybe he was talking about Vito, because the Corleone compound was on Long Island.) It is just slang; just like when I was 20 people used to say that someone “was on crack.” But no one cares about putting things into context; that doesn’t keep you watching through the next commercial.
This whole thing really bummed me out, particularly how Xavier just fell apart after all of this. The fight was ugly, but it isn’t the first ugly basketball fight.
I live about 1 mile away from the Xavier campus. I go to some of the games. Tu is an absolute joy to watch play basketball. He is so good at so many things, in such command of the game, and leaves it all out on the floor. This should have been his year to really shine. He should have been this season’s Jimmer; the guy from a mid-major conference who just grabs college hoops by the balls. He was definately on that track prior to the fight and the team’s collapse.
I am on Twitter @jeffchaley
Burnt Orange Nation
Hoop-Math
gangsta, slang, language
i lived the last 15 years in NYC and Jersey City. urban kids of every color call themselves and each other "nigga"s incessantly. “gangsta” rap culture has become teeny bopper culture, & middle class white suburbanites would be horrified (their kids much less so). but if a teenage asian-american kid and a european-american and an african-american kid were all talking smack, most white americans would be more scared of the black kid.
If Tu Holloway was white, his language would have been interpreted for what it was – the colorful language of a pervasive youth counter-culture.
unfortunately, racism (there really isn’t any such thing as “race”) and ethnic hostilities can be found in every culture around the world. it’s the story of “the other”

by 






























