Elevated Discourse: A Proposal
Phil Steele is off the press. Without the structure of practices and the watchful eye of coaches, player arrests are mounting. And the low hanging fruit which are Stewart Mandel mailbags are back on our internets. (Wait... savoring that one... Okay.)
Yes, college football is on the horizon. We're not exactly close, but we're getting close to the time when it's close. Fall practices will kick into gear in six weeks. Conference media days won't be far behind. Preseason polls (for 2008) should be available for perusal any day now.
We. Are. Getting. CLOSE! (Sort of.)
Before we get too close, though, and the excitement of it all overwhelms us, Peter Bean and Orson Swindle humbly offer a set of proposals, which we pledge to follow. If you're inspired to join the Movement, there's more than enough room on the train. We note, though, that we are suspicious of any club which would have us as a member, so tread carefully.
Proposed:
1. We will not participate in the Conference Wars. We won't be shy to look closely at schedule strength in talking about our dear sport and the ranking of teams therein, but we solemnly swear to avoid the tired, generic Conference War Chest Thumping.
2. We will actively abstain from 1=1 thinking/writing. Wins are good, losses are bad. You're smart enough to figure this out on your own. We're here for the curly fries, please, and not the standard potatoes you can find anywhere else.
3. We will abstain from constructing an All-American team. Until our requests for film of every game played gets approved by every university, we'll politely decline the temptation to construct such a list. Truth is, we don't know. There are better ways to talk about the keepers.
4. We will not break down a Stewart Mandel mailbag. This was a hard one for us, but damnit, we're drawing the line in the sand. When we fry fish in 2007, we'll be gunning for dolphins, not minnows, dig? Plus Braves and Birds has already perfected this form, anyway.
5. When referring to a team's ranking, we will use the BlogPoll. Two years of Beta Testing were enough to let us know that the bloggin' types pay a lot more attention to their ballots than the jaded, overworked sportswriters. Furthermore, as far as we're concerned, the Harris Poll doesn't exist. And let's not even bring up coaches voting on other coaches except in the name of sporting satire.
If it's up to us, Brian's BlogPoll takes its giant leap forward in year three. Join the revolution, compadres.
6. We will mercilessly ridicule BlogPoll voters who fail to live up to the BlogPoll's ever-improving standards. Wack balloteers who fail to justify their opinions will be openly mocked. Or, pending Brian's approval, banished to Oxford to serve a one-year sentence as Ed Orgeron's translator. LEMMETAIFOOTBAWYAW!
7. We will tirelessly promote the work of Sunday Morning Quarterback until he is rightly crowned College Football Blog King. No explanation needed here. Right?
8. We will focus on the brutal facts of the matter. None of this nancy pants psycho-babble that's best reserved for Reader's Digest. You didn't lose because of some ghostly otherworldly spectre of "intimidation." You lost because your left tackle is not stronger and faster than the man he is facing. Readers are smart enough to accept this. If something silly like this is invoked, it will be in an admittedly silly fashion.
9. We will kneecap the weak-brained, starting with ourselves. And in the spirit of the rule, we'll admit our errors freely. Even proudly. (Because there will be plenty of them, especially for Orson, the Harry Caray of blogging re: accuracy.)
10. We will focus on what is interesting/fun, not on what is traditionally important/powerful. If Hawaii-Boise State is The game... so be it. There's a zillion games a weekend, not one. Find your bliss somewhere between DirectTV channels 305 and 360, because it's a universal slate now. You truly live in golden times, reader.
11. We will challenge the paradigms which govern mainstream football thought, starting with LD's "GameDay Recap." You're all on notice--especially you, um, ourselves.
12. We will never let "Did you play football?" end an argument. That. party. is. over. Surgeons don't cut off the wrong leg and then ask you if you went to med school. They write your lawyer a check for 3 million dollars and quietly slink away to practice medicine in Belize.
13. Unless we inexplicably decide to write a post on the NBA, Bill Simmons name will never appear on this site. We're as tired of the too-easy Simmons bashing as we are of the Simmons columns themselves.
14. We are not serious. If we are, disclaimers will appear. Tuberculosis has the job of being serious. That position is taken and tired.
15. We will limit our complete ad hominem hatred of a coach to one man and one man only. Orson drafts Bobby Bowden. Peter selects Bob Stoops. You may grab your own Free Parking pass on one and one coach only.
16. We couldn't care less about season-end awards. The Heisman Trophy is dead to us. Unless and until they put Kyle in charge, we're indifferent.
17. We are fans of the game, above all else. This is s'posed to be fun, y'hear? Those who try to ruin our sport will be brutalized. Amen.
Signed,
Peter Bean and Orson Swindle
0 recs |
32
comments
Read Related
Comments
I can only pick one??
I call Franchione as my designated coach-to-be-dissed.
by SelimSivad on Jun 18, 2007 9:39 AM CDT 0 recs
Absolutely agree
I don't know whether to hope he hangs on just so we can continue to watch him underachieve or whether to pull against Aggy in all things, which is my natural instinct.
by Horntod on
Jun 18, 2007 11:35 AM CDT
up
0 recs
One more
Will you also agree never to use the term 'swagger'?
by Caradoc on Jun 18, 2007 10:12 AM CDT 0 recs
Done
That's included in #8 - none of that mysticism 'round here.
by PB @ BON on
Jun 18, 2007 10:16 AM CDT
up
0 recs
agreed!
man, I hate the way that word is used.
"I do not think that word means what you think it means."
P.S. Did you play football?!??
by SelimSivad on
Jun 18, 2007 10:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Wow, I was inspired...
Stayin' Alive (54-Bee Gees style)
Well, you can tell by the way I like to write,
I'm a football fan: no time to spite.
SMQ's solid and Ladies is warm.
And I been banned from "da club" since I was born.
But now it's all right - it's O.K. -
Cuz PB and Orson made a pledge today.
We can try to understand the blogosphere's effect on man.
Whether you're a blogger or whether you're a hater,
You're stayin alive, stayin' alive.
Feel the BON breakin' when ev'rybody's hatin'
but we're stayin' alive, stayin' alive.
Ah, ha, ha, ha, Stayin' Alive.
Well now, I get low and I get high
If CFB don't start soon, I'm gonna die.
I actually played football, walked in those shoes,
When it comes to arguments, I just can't lose.
And you know it's all right, it's O.K.
I can talk about beauty pageants everyday.
We can try to understand the Blogosphere's effect on man.
Whether you're a blogger or whether you're a hater,
You're stayin alive, stayin' alive.
Feel the BON breakin' when ev'rybody's hatin'
and we're stayin' alive, stayin' alive.
Ah, ha, ha, ha, Stayin' Alive.
Not another Mandel mail-baggggg. Somebody help me.
Somebody help, me, yeah.
by 54b on Jun 18, 2007 10:49 AM CDT 0 recs
40AS is trying to find my...
highlight reel on YouTube right now. It's only 3 seconds, but PB says he can find anything.
He's also looing for the lost footage of Miss Rhode Island spraining her tongue on a cherry stem...riveting.
by 54b on
Jun 18, 2007 11:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Namechecking the Ladies...
will get you everywhere.
by Texas Gal on
Jun 18, 2007 12:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Damn straight
Pretty sure it got me an automatic bye to the finals of the Hottest Blogger Tourney.
Still waiting on my 7x10 autographed glossy from Miss Texas though.
by 54b on
Jun 18, 2007 12:27 PM CDT
up
0 recs
At least
It'll get you an automatic bye to the finals of my own personal Awesomest Texas Fans bracket.
by Texas Gal on
Jun 18, 2007 1:08 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Awesome
And to think the Miss Hawaiian Tropics Pageant disqualified me...I'm sure it was because of over-tanning. Sure enough, I went back to see my board certified tanning technician at Darque Tan to complain and he said, "Once you go black, you can't get your money back." Needless to say, I was robbed.
But this totally makes up for it.
Have a good one,
54b
by 54b on
Jun 18, 2007 2:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Conference War chest thumping.......ahoy!
Has anyone ever seen this?
http://collegefootballsprs.com/
Thompson/rting Major conferences
37.57 Big East
36.30 S E C
36.06 Big 12
33.61 Pac-10
33.11 Big Ten
32.43 A C C
29.61 Mtn West
27.10 Conf USA
24.15 Mid America
23.76 W A C
22.43 Independents
17.80 Sun Belt
"All aspects" refers to 18 game statistical categories
and their respective correlation to winning. Some are
listed below:
Offense: rushing, passing, pass efficiency, scoring
pass yds/attempt, etc.
Defense: Like categories.
Special: punting, kick returns, punt returns.
Other: turnover margin, yds/play (net).
Each category is assigned points, weighted by correlation
to winning, and the total is scaled for each team on a
119 team base.
These numbers allowed Thompson to be the #1 predictive
system in 2006 (Beck). They ranked #4 against the spread.
The conference numbers are specific, measurable and
based on actual performance.
by EYESofBEVO on Jun 18, 2007 11:02 AM CDT 0 recs
Just to be clear
If a surgeon cuts of the wrong leg he may have to write a check for 3 million but instead of going to Belize he will probably cross the either the Brooklyn or Tri-Borough Bridge and set up shop in one of those Boroughs of despair.
At least that's what happens in NYC.
by Paragon SC on Jun 18, 2007 11:46 AM CDT 0 recs
Boroughs of despair?
Ouch.
Apparently you've never been to Fort Greene.
by BrooklynHorn on
Jun 18, 2007 12:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I tease of course...
as I am a Manhattan Snob and don't across the east bridges much.
I have my own cross to bear by living in NJ.
Talk about OUCH!
by Paragon SC on
Jun 18, 2007 12:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
ooh, tough break there paragon...
jersey? i don't car how convenient it is to manhattan. there's no excuse.
and i'll vouch for brooklyn. i live in manhattan, but i love the idea of brooklyn, if not actually getting on a subway and going there save for the occasional house party.
by billyzane on
Jun 18, 2007 12:30 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So Many Choices
How am I supposed to narrow down my list to ONE coach? At various times, I love to make fun of Stoops, Spurrier, Mangino, Carroll, Tressel and even Leach. I'm still allowed to make fun of the others, as long as I just HATE on one coach?
I proudly support #7.
by Texas Gal on Jun 18, 2007 12:18 PM CDT 0 recs
how could I forget
And FRANCHIONE- the jokes write themselves, there.
by Texas Gal on
Jun 18, 2007 12:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Absolutely
You can poke fun all you like. It's the irrational seething hatred for a coach that we're restricting to one.
Take Stoops!
by PB @ BON on
Jun 18, 2007 12:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Bobby Bowden is a lovable old man
hating him is like raping a puppy.
by Old Tex29 on
Jun 18, 2007 12:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You are one of the few people I have
ever heard that was not a die hard FSU fan actually defend Bowden.
From the few conversations I have had about him with other people, I would say that the general consensus is that he has a reputation of being sleazy and is just slightly better than Miami when it comes to recuriting out of the Florida penal leagues and allowing their players to get away with anything. But I could be off base on that assumption.
by Wells on
Jun 18, 2007 12:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Oh
I'll take Stoops, all right. Take him out back and dirty up that stupid visor of his. Visors are a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, unless you are a hot golfer who is golfing.
Just thinking about his smug face in that dumbass visor pisses me off.
Stoops it is!
by Texas Gal on
Jun 18, 2007 1:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
number 16
I applaud the initiative on this topic...but what if a Longhorn is in the running for the aforementioned "highest" postseason honor? Still no mention?
by Jason Mayer on Jun 18, 2007 2:46 PM CDT 0 recs
After the VY snub
It's lost its meaning.
We'll support any Longhorn who gets recognition, but we won't waste any energy typing up analyses of whether Steve Slaton or Colt Brennan is going to be more media adored.
by PB @ BON on
Jun 18, 2007 2:56 PM CDT
up
0 recs
alternatively...
if the Heisman has to be mentioned, it should always, without exception, come accompanied with the parenthetical: (which, inexplicably, was never awarded to Vince Young...)
by agent orange on
Jun 18, 2007 4:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
re: #8
It will be a happy day for me when I never have to hear about School X's fearsome homefield advantage.
It's funny how that 'advantage' always shows up greatest when you have incredibly talented teams, and disappears when the talent graduates/leaves.
I always prefer Xs and Os breakdowns of wins and losses, anyway.
As for #15, I'd probably have to choose Fran. Probably kinda bad to hate the coach of your own team, but I can't stand him. He is everything I don't want a college coach to be.
Re: #16
Anyone who thinks Vince was robbed obviously didn't watch the 2005 A&M game; he was horrific. Bush, otoh, tore up UCLA after tearing up Fresno State the week before, and the nation was mesmerized.
by Beergut on Jun 19, 2007 3:04 AM CDT 0 recs
This is why the awards are dead to us
Fresno State gave up 200 yards to every back they faced in 2005. UCLA was just plain awful.
Vince had the flu for the A&M game, and lost the Heisman because he didn't play very well.
The Rose Bowl proved who the best in CFB was. Read the linked piece in that rule. It's not the first time the best player hasn't won.
The early voting and the amount it's dependent on lazy sportswriters has killed its value to me.
by PB @ BON on
Jun 19, 2007 9:16 AM CDT
up
0 recs
what never gets much mention
in the 05 heisman race is that both players had phenomenal talent. You wouldve expected the voting to be 49%-51%.... a really close race. I think most Texas fans couldve been okay if Vince barely lost.
That wasnt the case. It was a landslide, which is further proof the award is handed out by media outlets that like to show front flips.
by the other Andrew on
Jun 19, 2007 12:16 PM CDT
up
0 recs
the other Andrew nails it
This was my exact gripe. In reality when you take off the burnt orange glasses or put down that Trojan sword, the Bush vs VY vote was splitting hairs. They both deserve a trophy, even though I believe VY's burden to carry the Horns made his performances even greater, thus more outstanding.
The fact that it was so lopsided is proof positive that Sportscenter ran the campaign for Bush all season long -- and any play by VY was moot. I remember reading that over half the voters had already cast their votes long before the A&M game even took place.
ESPN watchers had spoken. An affirmative for highlight reels. No reason to even pay attention to the other guy.
by EYESofBEVO on
Jun 19, 2007 1:10 PM CDT
up
0 recs












