The Burnt Orange National Tour of Barking Carnivals, Vol. 1.2
Same song as last week, different tune. Be sure to check out Barking Carnival for all sorts of insightful and humorous Longhorn content.
PB: The first month has come and gone, with ups and downs. In today's game, of course, Ws and Ls are all that matters, and Texas sits at 4-0. We don't have any impressive skins on the wall, but win we did.
Last week we spent some time discussing which young players needed to see more action and whether the coaches would give them that opportunity. Muckelroy, Norton, Kindle, McGee, Chiles, Beasley, and several other young CBs actually saw the field for multiple series this week. Part of that was our lowly opponent, but play they did.
The cupcakes are off the schedule, however, and Big 12 play begins. I think we got a good sense of the capabilities of the young talent and how they can immediately improve the team.
So, first question for discussion is this:
You're the coach of the Longhorns. Describe your personnel planning heading into Big 12 play.
![]() |
| If this guy can share carries... |
I'd work Chiles into the game in a meaningful situation. It doesn't even have to be at QB. I'd line him up at receiver or running back just get the ball into his hands. Give Oklahoma something else to have to prepare for.
I'd give McGee some more snaps as well, but I wouldn't be stupid about it. Let's not turn him into a one trick pony like Chris Robertson or Henry Melton.
Hix would get a lot of snaps at tackle because we have no depth. Huey and Burnette would play more so we can see what our running game looks like if the guards don't have to help the center.
Work in Wells and Brown in the secondary. We might need a corner over 5'10" when we face Malcolm Kelly, Adarius Bowman, Michael Crabtree and Maurice Purify.
Our defensive line rotation is fine. Nothing to change there. Same at receiver.
Most of these changes will happen. I just hope it doesn't take another 50 point loss to OU to get them implemented.
Scipio Tex: As HJ wrote, it's really a matter of timelines. I wouldn't touch S, WR, DL, TE.
The LB switch to Muck and Norton for the bulk of the snaps is a no-brainer; it's beyond reasonable
disagreement at this point.
On the OL, we're doing a fair job of integrating everyone on an appropriate time line. You can't just
throw freshmen OL out there sink or swim.
I'd like to see Chiles with a simple package at QB: zone read, direct snap QB lead draw, a play action pass, a bootleg. We don't need him coming in for one play to run some gadget or to run the old Tony Jeffery WR sweep. Give him a series or two. Let's look at him in the red zone.
Vondrell McGee is a major talent, an ideal zone read back, and a nice complement to Charles. I'd like him to play a quarter of our offensive series. No one complains when Felix Jones takes 10-12 carries from Darren McFadden. For good reason.
As for CB, tall and burned is just as bad as short and burned. The young DBs don't represent an immediately identifiable upgrade in the short term (i.e. in time for Dallas) the way that the LBs do. It's quite debatable that Deion Beasley is a substantial upgrade over Brandon Foster. The true freshmen aren't. Over the medium & long haul, they all have a far higher ceiling than our current guys (height joke not intended). Ryan Palmer has been our surest CB to date. In some respects we may just have to play the hand dealt us - there's no magic personnel wand to be waved at this juncture.
PB: I don't disagree with any of that, and have little to add. Instead for our second question, then, let's turn to Kansas State.
The Wildcats have thrown the ball - get ready for this - 132 times through three games. They only attempted 16 rushes against Auburn ( 2.7 ypa), then upped that to 27 against San Jose State (5.7 ypa). I don't really care what they did against Southwest Missouri State.
As fans certainly remember, Texas lost to KSU last season because it couldn't stop the big play over the top. Based on what we've seen so far this season, the Wildcats will come in to Austin with every intention to pass, pass often, and then pass some more.
What's Duane Akina's best move to prep for a team who wants to come out and gun it through the air?
Henry James: His best move is to get pressure on Freeman, but he has to be smart about it. Don't make it obvious from which direction the pressure is going to come. He also has to make sure that the linebackers and secondary tackle well enough behind it to limit yards after catch. Part of that is the correct matchups. I don't want to see Scott Derry chasing a slot receiver. Stop the run with only your front seven and keep the safeties back to help out deep. Don't be Gene Chizik. Make Kansas St beat you with short passes/long drives. The play of the Wildcats is a reflection of their coach. Hard but stupid. They'll shoot themselves in the foot with penalties and turnovers.
Scipio Tex: I have nothing to add there. HJ nails it.
PB: Thanks again, gentlemen. Here's to another good Saturday.
0 recs |
7
comments
Read Related
Comments
Kindle?
I like the Norton and Muck calls, but what about Kindle? Assuming he's healthy enough to play (any news on that?), how often do we get him in there?
I've seen a lot of criticism in the past for him looking lost on the field, but the kid is an athletic freak. There has to be some way to get him out there.
I have a vision of him running down Bradford up in Dallas and knocking the ball loose from behind, DJ-style. Someone tell me he'll see enough pt to make that happen.
by renfro redux on Sep 25, 2007 9:42 AM CDT 0 recs
great, as usual,
but once again, I have to ask: where is the funny?
Here's another sample from their latest "Post-Mortem" game analysis:
When you play someone reasonably helpless, it’s important not to get too euphoric, but a 35-17 victory with no playing time for the the freshmen would have been an elephant turd in our Froot Loops. Beyond the stats, the score, the rout, the team showed some things that give us hope. And hope is the Chinese food of the college football fan. But now we’re hungry for something that will stick to our bones.
Perhaps something other than what Chef Killebrew can serve up?
by jc25 on Sep 25, 2007 10:16 AM CDT 0 recs
I have to disagree with this:
"The play of the Wildcats is a reflection of their coach. Hard but stupid."
He beat Texas with trick plays last year, took advantage of our known weaknesses to perfection. I wouldn't call him stupid. Also, he's a D-IA head coach, and I'm guessing Henry James is not.
Regarding Wells, did he get suspended along with Gatewood? i.e. is he allowed to play?
by SelimSivad on Sep 25, 2007 12:31 PM CDT 0 recs
I disagree as well...
The play of the Wildcats is a reflection of their coach. Hard but stupid. They'll shoot themselves in the foot with penalties and turnovers.
The comment about K-State being a reflection of their coach was pretty absurd. You must have really forgot which team youre covering, do you know how many yards we give up in penalties? So consider that point null and void if you ask me. K-State beat us last year with a pretty well thought out plan. Those "trick" plays were executed properly. If there was anyone who was coached to play hard but stupid, it was the Texas team last year. (And a lot of times, this year.) Hence the fact that we had a Thorpe award winner and still one of the worst pass defenses in the country. It wasn't like K-State was the only team to try to beat us with trick plays either. (See: Nebraska) I honestly dont believe we would have won that game last year even if we had Colt playing behind center that day. That loss was squarely on the defense. I'd throw deep on that secondary too if I knew they couldn't defend a playaction pass. I really think you should have said more to him after making such a rediculous and arrogant comment like that. Pretty hard to believe someone would call a coach that beat your team stupid. It just shows no respect, which is how upsets happen.
by saveadre on Sep 25, 2007 5:32 PM CDT 0 recs
Couple of things
First of all, I don't think HL and Scipio will argue the point that Texas coaches were bad last year.
Moreover, just because Texas' coaches made mistakes does not excuse Ron Prince from any of his own. The Wildcats are the NCAA's most penalized team. They were 91st last year.
They rank 98th in turnover margin this year. And 75th last year.
You may disagree with his word choice, but the evidence is damning.
I think Kansas State caught lightning in a bottle last year. They did everything right for one evening and we did everything wrong. And they won by 3. More on this in a full post.
by PB @ BON on
Sep 25, 2007 5:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
using Chiles in his own series
I watched the replay of the Rice game Monday morning.
I'm honestly not sure if Chiles knows the offensive plays they were calling.
There was a play down near the goal line where McGee went left at the snap (possibly for a lead block), and Chiles paused for a second, then did a fake handoff to NO ONE, then ran the ball.
I really don't think the Rice game showed much of anything for the team, b/c the same issues that were showing in wins over UCF, Arkie State, and TCU were still showing up.
You still have no clue how to stop a simple zone (dart) read, mainly b/c your LBs are mediocre to terrible.
Your secondary is still atrocious.
Your OL still has major issues.
I just don't see how any of y'all can look at your team, and see a top 10 program.
Now, if y'all really wanted to mess with OU, you should have either Chiles or Jamaal Charles as the QB in a direct snap Wildcat/Wild Hog series ala Arkansas, Pitt, et al. Have Quan Cosby as the slot receiver in the left side coming in motion, and away you go. That might be giving Greg Davis too much credit for creativity, though.
by Beergut on Sep 26, 2007 4:18 PM CDT 0 recs


















